Memento Vs Drytron Post INFO Yu-Gi-Oh!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- DB Grinder Streams Highlights - / @dbgrinderstreams
My Twitch - / thedbgrinder
My Team's UA-cam - / @jnccollectibles
Twitter - / thedbgrinder
Discord Community - / discord
Patreon - / thedbgrinder
If you want to Send Replays in just send them to my discord - thedbgrinder
Get Your DB Grinder Merch here!!!! - shop.spreadshi...
💰💸Affiliate Links + Sponsors 💸💰
🤩 Code ‘dbg10’ For 10% Off - www.imperiumdu...
🤑 Code 'DBG5' for 5% off your order at - cardboardconci...
🤠 Code "DBG" for 5% off SleeveChief - bit.ly/3EvaIbI
⛓️ Code "DBG5" for 5% off ChainLink Products! - www.chainlink-...
😋 Code "DBG5" For 5% off - www.grimoireac...
🤍 Consider Becoming a Channel Member to Help Support the Channel : ) - / @thedbgrinder
👊 Use my TCGplayer Affiliate Link by Simply Clicking the link then shop! - tcgplayer.pxf....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business inquiries (Replays get sent to my discord) - grinderofdb@gmail.com
Please let this be a good Memento replay, deck has been preforming pretty good in the OCG
Nvm that Memento player sold G3 lmao
its a bit tough vs evenly lightning storm no?@@Rhapsodyizz
@@Rhapsodyizz Literally
@@RhapsodyizzG1 was pretty good tho
IP Masqerena is sick in drytron.That new Meteonis can negate 4 times if you can summon him again,so after negating twice you can use IP and Meteonis to link into Dyna mondo shuffle back a card with first effect and then tribute it to summon Meteonis again and you can negate 2 more monsters.
And if you have the continuous, you can get two more negates
drytron is best deck love it so much
DRYTROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON!!!!
Pls let this be a good Drytron replay
that had to be a different Memento player in game 3 lmao. what tf was that lol
Instead of running falco you can run shadoll core and do it with top hat to get a spell trap pop too
ok thats sick , im taking notes
Nu2 and Mewtwo?
Plz let this be a decent drytron player
Momento is so crazy and so cheeks at the same time
Like Heroes
Just saw this, I know it’s late but there was a better play ; otk.
14:28 memento player cl 3 memento fusion using both combined creation and dark blade and falco making guardian chimera.
New chain links cl 1 chimera cl 2 falco in order to chain block ritual eff. Pop both ritual monsters draw a blank, next ss the combined creation and use the trap in grave to reduce the atk of opp monsters by 1k and enter bp. Combined creation plus guardian 8300. Otk plus follow up the fusion in grave to add a bone party or something.
Finally a good replay
Lost to memento at locals the other day. I dislike it. They pop and add and pop and add and have so much gas. Gotta disrupt the graveyard or remove it entirely to beat them. Droll works too. 😂🎉. I’m hating on the deck 😂
Good showcase of both decks too
Finally some memento
Have been enjoying playing memento on MD but in a 15 plus HT format it does struggle a bit. Definitely needs some more extenders. One of the few decks that’s just about all engine
UNBAN ISOLDE
No.
waiting for fiendsmith live-twin replay
“You’re A Stick”
Memento gaming
Feel like the past few Drytron replays not doing deck justice. Can do or of cool things with the new card tbh and I haven’t seen any of it lol I’ve been ending on IP, Fafnir XYZ Monster, DRYTRON DAD AND magikey ritual with trap
That was a common thing in builds around 2022 I think.
Nova alone gets you DAD + Dawn Dragster or any link 2 of your choice. No way those custom hands the player in the vid was opening were ending on barely anything like that
@@ak47dragunov this is what I’m saying lol
Memento clears easy
Unfortunately his opponent oppened 2 boardbreakers
@@truekingofallgeneraiders you mean the memento Player did throw the game
@@CSCH69 that aswell but tbh, i won't criticise him, the deck is hard and it looked he was kinda new to it.
6 views in 1 m- hey wait a second
my 2 fave decks
hey
Drytron without the support feels way stronger
Because it kinda is. Hand traps hurt without the support more though
@@HaruKodama I mean depends what do want to do.
It has higher ceiling but is much less consistent. Also ppl still have to familiarise with the new cards and lines, give it a couple weeks
Depends on how you play the drytron player in the replay isn’t good
@@consoleunkn3152 I'd argue the strongest build is MOBCM. Maybe MOBCM+Vanity
feel like the memento player focused waaay to much on follow-up g3. couldve summoned winda to keep them out of the game, or searched key mace with angwitch to snatch steal mu beta. maybe they were scared of imperm, but even the line they chose would've lost to it regardless.
That game 3 really showed memento followup turns are very clumsy and generic monster negates just hose you. This drytron deck doesn’t seem to do anything special. It’s just some negates.
That Memento player g3 played really poorly, wasn't really the deck's fault there
If youre not impressed that the followup after evenly lightining storm could have beaten a pop 2 + 2 monster negates with destruction...
Deck have follow up to almost beat 2 negate monster and 2 send and having 3 pop on last turn while getting hit by both evenly and lightning storm somehow having clumsy follow up lmao, also he playing rather poorly that game 3
@@Rhapsodyizzdid they miss time their pop 3 off the fusion on turn 3, or did they not add correct follow-up? I know SP could've helped if they made her turn 1 instead of IP
@@mess6818what could they have done differently? better end board/usage of interruption?
I’m super disappointed with memento’s design. Had such cool potential to be an interactive deck, but every card needs to be proactively destroyed, you get nothing back if your opponent interacts with you. Also they have no good extenders and aren’t really rewarded for playing a lot of engine at all, you just play a bunch of starters and then single names. The only sort-of exception being the fusion spell.
At the end of the day It’s just another one card 37-minute turn combo deck that sets up a ton of interruptions and loses to a single interruption itself most of the time. Terrible dynamic.
Lmao memento doesn't lose to 1 interruption. Horse is full combo and axtender, fusion and bone party are the same.
It's definitely a thirty-minute combo deck, but it needing proactive destruction rather than getting free plusses when your opponent outs your board is a good thing. Otherwise you get the most frustrating aspect of playing against tearlament.
@@lulunisha that’s one of the best things about tearlament imo. Why would it be interesting if you just lose the game to a raigeki? Hyper proactive decks are the main problem with modern yugioh, and this archetype took a mechanic, destruction, and just turned it into a different way to just do the same thing as every other deck. Do you think the new fire king cards are frustrating to play against? Do you prefer playing against tenpai where they just fold to air if they draw no hand traps going first? What sort of dynamic do you want out of the game if you think floating effects are frustrating to play against?
@@robertbauerle5592You must understand that this is a 2 player game, there's nothing fun about breaking a board and feeling that the opponent is not losing.
@@d.e.g.e.3061 That comes down to how powerful the floating effects are. Tear was obviously ahead of it's time in terms of power level, but the design of floating effects as a negative feedback loop is good for creating a back and forth. Board breakers create a very unhealthy dynamic in two out of three possible scenarios - 1, the board is broken and you immediately win the game due to the swing in advantage or just flat out killing your opponent. 2, breaking the board is negated/stopped and nothing is achieved, so you simply lose the game. 3, the board breaker succeeds, but doesn't completely counteract your opponents board or potential interruptions. Your opponent could have follow up in their hand or GY, or their cards float into follow up - the game continues.
1 and 2 do not fall in line with a back and forth dynamic, and unfortunately that's what most decks in the modern meta fall into. To be clear, I'm not saying that 3 should happen every single time a board is attempted to be broken, but I do think that 1 & 2 should happen a lot less often, especially on the second turn of the game.
The fact that it's a two player game goes both ways, not just one way. Having your board entirely broken with no possibility of follow up or chance of winning after the fact is just as bad a feeling as not being able to break the board in the first place - somewhere halfway is where the sweet spot is.