International Community CALL-OUT CHINA to Abide the 2016 Arbitral Ruling
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- The Philippines, together with the United States, European Union, and allies call on China to abide by the 2016 Arbitral Ruling of the South China Sea
The Philippines celebrated on Friday, the eighth anniversary of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 2016 ruling, that the nation has exclusive sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea, and that China’s nine-dash line is invalid. With pouring support globally, international community led by the United States and European Union, called out China to abide the 2016 Arbitral Ruling.
On July 12, marks the eighth anniversary of the award issued by the tribunal, constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, in the arbitration instituted by the Republic of the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China, concerning the South China Sea.
This award represents a significant milestone in the peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea. Dispute settlement mechanisms provided under UN Convention on the Law of the Sea contribute to the maintenance, and furthering of the international legal order, based on the rule of law.
While the Philippines' 2016 Arbitral Award victory, gains more international support every year, China continues to defies and will never accept the ruling. It is far too dug in, on its discredited maritime claims, over nearly all of the South China Sea.
Beijing refused to join the arbitral proceedings back in 2013, is itself an undeniable fact, that it got no solid case to secure a legal victory. So, it went on to attack the tribunal, the award, and the Unclos itself, while China is pretending to champion for international law.
The international community, led by the United States, reaffirms there unwavering support for the Philippines right in the West Philippine Sea, in upholding international law particularly Unclos.
In a statement released by US Secretary of State, The United States joins the Philippines in marking the 8th anniversary of the final and legally binding Arbitral Ruling. U.S. State Secretary Antony Blinken affirms the Arbitral Tribunal's determination that China's expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea are inconsistent with international law.
“We continue to call on the People’s Republic of China to abide by the 2016 arbitral ruling, to cease its dangerous and destabilizing conduct, and to comport its conduct as well as its territorial and maritime claims in the South China Sea to the international law of the sea.
US Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Carlson also posted on X to support their unwavering support to the Philippines in marking the Victory of the 2016 Arbitral Ruling.
In a statement Published by Australian Ambassador to The Philippines, the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral Award, which is final and binding, all parties involved must respect and honor the award. Australia has consistently called for the decision to be respected. Adherence to Unclos is vital for an open, stable and prosperous region.
Over the years, the Philippines has continued to demonstrate this commitment to peace even in the face of the unlawful actions which have caused serious incidents in the South China Sea. Without ever diminishing their resolve, to protect and promote their people’s interest, and the full and responsible enjoyment of its legally settled maritime entitlements and its accompanying rights and jurisdictions, the DFA said in a statement.
The Award is a reaffirmation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and protects their rights as a coastal state and a seafaring people. Every effort to secure their legitimate interests in its maritime domain is a testament to the determination and courage of the Filipino people, while showcasing the Philippines’ vision of peace and stability that inspires and resonates beyond the waters of the South China Sea.
China’s aggression is borne out of its sweeping claim over most of the South China Sea. In 2016, however, the arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of the Philippines and invalidated China’s nine-dash, now ten-dash line claims.
China expresses strong dissatisfaction, with firm opposition to the United States and European Union’s statement on the 8th anniversary of the South China Sea arbitration and has lodged solemn representations. According to China, the US and EU are not party to the South China Sea issue and their statement, disregarding the history and facts of the South China Sea issue, openly endorses the Philippines’ infringement on China’s sovereignty.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @aseananalytics
![[UA] Team Vitality проти NAVI | IEM Cologne 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wttO1zVRTC0/mqdefault.jpg)
under Article 2, UNclos Annex VII
Article 2: List of arbitrators
l. A list of arbitrators shall be drawn up and maintained by the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Every State Party shall be entitled to nominate four arbitrators, each of whom shall be a person experienced in maritime affairs and enjoying the highest reputation for fairness, competence and integrity. The names of the persons so nominated shall constitute the list.
The Arbitration was approved by United nation general Assembly make this proceeding legal and bindings to all parties Involved
And US don’t recognise UNCLOS and not member either. 😮😮😮😮
@@seekersoul3439US is not part of the convention but it does not mean US is against on it. Meanwhile China is a signatory of UNCLOS but defy to the convention😅
Permanent COURT OF ARBITRATION PCA is not an UN agency and all the 5 Judges are from NATOs countries? 😮
Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an UN agency. ALL THE 5 JUDGES ARE FROM NATOs countries 😅😂😅😂
@@aseananalyticsofficial1894 well, action speak louder than word and key board. If international community and US support it as you say, then MDT should invoke already on last June incident, as it is consider as intruding Philippine territory. That mean US and NATO which inclusiveness those international community countries that mention in this video should already activated MDT. Why wasn’t it done so. Because that decision was not recognise. China already say up front not agreeable to the UNCLOS before the arbitration discussion start and didn’t participate in that UNClos at all. By the way, there is no such thing as West Philippines Sea to even start with on EEZ. No country map has a location call west Philippines sea. And even Philippines own national map archive don’t have that location. In short, by fact of actual action and evident this clip is delusion
No one is above the Law.
The decision has been fully studied and agreed by the international body.
This is an excellent fact-based video. Thank you!
CHINA....RESPECT THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW.....NO TROUBLE!!!
Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an UN agency. ALL THE 5 JUDGES ARE FROM NATOs countries 😅😂😅😂
@@wionporky9937No one come up and agree with China even your allies. Just keep your opinion to yourself.
@@wionporky9937 lol chinese even thought your taking so much sea china is not a country it is a pirate
Yes but remember 1982 UNCLOS reward to PH.
International law is important to all reclamation.
Atlist PHILLIPINES support international community.
Unlike china territorial ambition only know all nation what's truth in the past few years😂😂😂@@wionporky9937
Not only 2016
1982 convention has decision...
Whats next reason???😂😂😂@@wionporky9937
China should follow the international law of the Sea.
0bey, laws. Obey UNCLOS.
Nice factually laid out video for the International community😊
These greedy Chinese felt that they own everything in Asia.
Just Asia? Have you seen what they're doing in Africa and in the Caribbean?
@@ThePHCentrist oh yeah but i am only referring to the South Seas which lots of countries are being deprive of their own territories.
The Scarborough Shoal is Chinese.
Excerpt from a USIP article - It is worth recalling that in 2012, the United States chose to persuade the Philippines to withdraw from Scarborough Shoal (a separate set of features north of the Spratlys) while making no effort to compel the PRC to do the same. In effect, Washington forced Manila to cede that set of features to the PRC.
@@wangchung7599 you are inventing stories just like your CCP. Please read the historical facts since the time of the Spanish colonization the original published maps by Velarde which was the basis of the UN Internationsl tribunal in 2016 that establish the legitimacy of the Philippines claims on West Philippine Sea.
@@wangchung7599 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
Thanks to the UNCLOS FOR SUPPORTING THE TRUTH NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.MORE POWER TO UN.
#west philippine sea #atin ito....
pirates do not abide laws.. they only abide pirates code.. 😂😂😂😂
Thank you very much EU, USA ASEAN, ASIA, Friends, and All like Minded Country for Supporting 2016 Arbitration.. More Power to you God bless you you All 🙏🙏🙏💚💚💚👍🇵🇭💪
Pagpalain ka ng Diyos ang Pilipinas 🇺🇲💖🇵🇭
Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an UN agency. ALL THE 5 JUDGES ARE FROM NATOs countries 😅😂😅😂
Di kayo tumatangap Ng katwiran, Ng Tama at katotohanan, ang alam nyo mang agaw, manakaw. Dahil malaki Malakas at makapangyarihan kayo. Bagay inabot at naranasan na nyo ang
@@wionporky9937 read annex 7 of the UNCLOS
@@wionporky9937 excuses, excuses and the never ending excuses of china.🤣
Mr Lin Jian, UNCLOS was created to avoid misunderstanding between countries when it comes to their maritime boundaries. It was signed and approved by almost all nations to include China. If all nations follow International law their will be no war.
Haha are pilipinos all so naive? If really every country agreed to so called international law why do countries still need to keep a military? Hahaha
nope. it was not recognized by majority of countries because it does not solve territorial disputes and actually made more conflicts. the first thing that need to be fixed is the credibility of the UN as it is influenced by special interest groups and mostly dominated by the rich western countries. it is not a proper representation of the world and being used as a tool for world geopolitics.
@@user-mx1ye3ne3o pure naive statement...if every country really follow so called international law what need is there for a country to spend so much money on military?
The United States makes no territorial claim in the SCS and takes no position on sovereignty over any of the geographic features in the SCS.
we are calling the United Nation to have re-mapping and recognized which is west Philippine sea and the boundaries of south china sea to avoid scalation prompted by china as the UNCLOS specified in 2016 ruling in favor to the Philippines...
Delusion 😂😂😂😂
😅😅😅UN didn't even accept the ruling. The peramnernt arbitary court in Hague is not even afflicited with UN😅😅😅
@@RichMidasPapathe tribunal was instituted under the annex VII of UNCLOS, approved by the UN General Secretary. The proceeding was approved by UN general assembly.
Under article 2, paragraph 1. FYI
@@RichMidasPapa don't spread stupidity
@@travelpinas9696 No， it is not. There is no official statement from UN yet states this court is under UN organization. Unfortunately， this permanent court is just rent in the same building of UN court.
Talking about history, Pre-colonial Filipinos were also seafarers and most likely fished in that area considering its proximity to our coastal lands. So, it doesn't justify PRC claims. It's a common fishing ground and no one took control of it. PRC is really not that bright! hahahahaha
China's illegal presence and creeping expansion within the Philippine Exclusive. Economic Zone is a blatant disregard to international law of UNCLOS.
China's nine-dash line claim was invalidated by the UNCLOS Permanent
Court of arbitration at the Hague in 2016...
China is among the first countries who signed the UNCLOS in 1982 and ratified it in 1994. But now China refuses to follow the rules based order of UNCLOS and rejects the arbitral court's' ruling, to assert nine-dash line claim of sovereignty on the WPS and the south china sea.
To deter/counter China's expansionism in Philippine EEZ,
The PCG and USCG must continue joint patrol of the WPS, the Scarborough, Ayungin, and Escoda shoals.
US Japan deploy troops, missiles and Typhon launchers systems, thru EDCA and RAA.
The philippines boost defense military capability - more ships, aircrafts, anti-ship missiles and anti-ship drones.
Oh God please in the name of Jesus now save the Philippines 🇺🇲💖🇵🇭
who is trouble maker . china
Nope its Philippines
That is correct. THERE IS NO SEAFARER FROM CHINA CROSSING ACROSS THE SOUTH CHINA SEA. EXPLORER LIKE MAGELLAN HAD SHIPS WHICH SANK IN THE THEN SOUTH CHINA SEA CARRYING PORCELAIN ITEMS, COINS SEEN IN THE AREA AND WERE NOT FROM CHINESE/CHINA.
The Potsdam and Cairo declaration doesn’t list Paracels, Scarborough and Spratlys as territories to be restored to China. Both declarations only said that Japan shall be expelled from said territories. Instead, it mentions that “all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, including Manchuria, Formosa, and the Pescadores shall be restored to the Republic of China”. All other islands outside the ones explicitly mentioned to be restored to China are instead managed by the league of nations at the time. In fact, in the 1951 San Francisco Peace conference, there was a motion by the Soviet Union to award the Spratlys and Paracels to China which was defeated 46 to 3 and 1 abstention. And thus the Treaty of Taipei between Japan and China merely reiterates what Japan has agreed upon in the San Francisco peace treaty resulting from the 1951 conference.
Congrats PBBM 🎉Philippines ❤Ikaw lang ang na kapag-ayos nyan 😮
Magula Ang bawat bansa Kong Walang international law...
It should be called as Asian Sea!
Delusion 😂😂😂Lol
@@seekersoul3439 better than fake history of what you called "Ancient times" that even International doesn't recognize . invalid. Null and void. 🤣🤣🤣
@@aldyarcala2679 ya. Right. Even wonder who is fake. Philippine own national map archives don’t have anything call West Philippines sea. As for international community back Philippines on this, was a delusion ? Does any of ASEAN country back up Philippines on last June incident ? Not a single country speak up for Philippines. Few more day will be a month since the incident. That’s goes on countries like Australia, NZ and South Korea. Now let’s move to far distance country, if indeed international community supports Philippine claim, then in particular US, France etc country that mentioned by this video who are NATO should invoke MDT already since Philippines claim it was Philippines territory, and does MDT been invoke ? China still physically at the location as China claim. Action speak louder than keyboard sound. Period.
@@aldyarcala2679 except for pilopinos puppet master all other nations are laughing at pilopinos hahaha
IF CCHN Choosed the other side of the coin , not the Court of Arbitration or unclos , pls be reminded that almost all of US allies has nuclear missile too . besides the US 12 Super Aircraft Carrier were almost all deployed nearby China ounce intelligience reports changes into positive mode .
Sekelompok bandit dari Filipina, izinkan saya bertanya, apakah wilayah ayah Anda yang Amerika adalah milik siapa pun yang mendudukinya terlebih dahulu? ? ?
Ask/write in english?😂😂😂
Hello, China pirates.
Eh bakit Hindi mapaalis ang mga chikwa n barko, Kung Tayo ang maykarapatan....WHY?
simple lang weak tayo militarily, kanya kanya kasing bulsa mga senators at congressman natin kung yung bilyon bilyon nilang ninanakaw ginamit nlng pambili ng mga barko natin nabantayan sana teritoryo natin datapat dyan binabala sa kanyon si Napoles at Iba pa.
Di nila tinatanggap yung Arbitral Ruling, papel lng daw yun
Dahil na spoiled ni duterte, kaya ngaun akala nila kanila na pti Pilipinas. Db sbi nya, mabuti pa dw maging province tau ng China. Sa knya nagcmula yan.
gusto mo gira? kaya ng phil?
What land or country they stole?
Noooo, 2016 are sponsored by you know whose rule of law 😅
2016 Unclos Was voted by majority of Its country members and China is one of its members thst should abide the Law . Dont be ignorant
To deter/counter China's expansionism in Philippine EEZ,
The PCG and USCG must continue joint patrol of the WPS,
The philippines boost defense military capability - more ships, aircrafts, anti-ship missiles and anti-ship drones,
and
file another arbitration cases to UNCLOS arbitration court on China's marine environmental damages in building artificial islands, violations of UNCLOS and the 2016 arbitral ruling, and preventing fishermen from Scarborough shoal.
What is more powerful international law or chinese intamadation law?
Scour the web and discover new news.
Time to comprehend PD 1596.
On 11 June 1978, President Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines issued Presidential decree No. 1596, declaring the Spratly Islands (referred to therein as the Kalayaan Island Group) as Philippine territory.
Chinese government is such a proud, arrogant assembly who doesn't even respect and abide by the rules of the result from the Tribunal Court, which favors the Philippines.. well, I'm not surprise either with the Filipinos attitude who doesn't even show gratitude to the United States after all the Americans have done for them.. does it sounds like a Karma, isn't it?.. 🤔🙄
What does the Philippines expect on the eight anniversary?
The Philippines expected the World to support our rightful claims
@@BisayangdakoVlogz The usual supporters have been doing it since 2016. What else?
@@BisayangdakoVlogzthe world is laughing at Philippines hahaha
PCS is not the ICJ. I think the 2016 ruling is not valid, not legally binding.
China already unknowingly recognized the Philippines' claims to the Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal when it referenced the *1900 Treaty of Washington* in its Position Paper to the 2013 Arbitral Tribunal in the Permanent Court of Arbitration:
"Prior to the 1970s, Philippine law had set clear limits to the territory of the Philippines, which did not involve any of China's maritime features in the South China Sea. Article 1 of the 1935 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines entitled "The National Territory", provided that the Philippines comprises all the territory ceded to the United States by the Treaty of Paris concluded between the United States and Spain on the tenth day of December, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, the limits which are set forth in Article III of the said treaty, *together with all the islands embraced in the treaty concluded at Washington between the United States and Spain on the seventh day of November, nineteen hundred,* and the treaty concluded between the United States and Great Britain on the second day of January, nineteen hundred and thirty, and all all territory over which the present Government of the Philippine Islands exercise jurisdiction."
Over night.
Philippine is an archepelago so the philippines is qualified for an extended EEZ.
The law of the sea is one sided, the brics country should form another alternatives court with wider composition of its judges.
Malaysia.
international community? More like Filipino community !
are you blind? deaf? LOL!
Isn't UNCLOS an International community? Or you in denial like the CCP bots 😅😊
Morw like you dont accept the reality even if you already watched the european news and others 😂😅
Vietnamese, Indian, Korean, American, European and Japanese communities are not part of the Filipino community. Please don’t expand our territory without our permission.
who supports China's claim? literally 0 🤣🤣. even North Korea cant say anything about it
Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an UN agency. ALL THE 5 JUDGES ARE FROM NATOs countries 😅😂😅😂
Why did China sign UNCLOS? hide your stupidity
Kayo Lang ang naniniwala sa gusto nyo., bagay, naranasan na nyo ang apihin at kayang kayanan. Pero di pilipino ang may gawa sa inyo nun.
International community? It is the NATO nations, US, Japan, S Korea and Philippines. It hardly adds up to 15% of global population!!!
How can it be an arbitration when there is only 1 party?
This is do much a western concept, Ukraine peace Summit, but Russia is not invited!!!!
UNCLOS has no jurisdiction on issues of sovereignty. It only covers navigation of the seas.
China has no Jurisdiction in the spratly islands and Scarborough shoals and other part of East Sea of Japan and West Philippine Sea and Taiwan. So China should leave its Pathetic claims
@@easternrazor3749 OverviewUsage examplesSimilar and opposite words
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
adjective
existing, occurring, or carried on between two or more nations.
"international trade"
@@easternrazor3749
What is the role of the UNCLOS?
In general, the UNCLOS defines the rights and responsibilities of nations with respect to their use of the world's oceans. It establishes guidelines for businesses, the environment and the management of marine natural resources
@@easternrazor3749
Has China signed up to UNCLOS?
The People's Republic of China became a full member of the United Nations in 1971, just in time to play a full part in the negotiations that resulted in UNCLOS.
@@goodvibes-do6ud For your limited information. UNCLOS only had jurisdiction on navigation of the seas. It is like a traffice policeman.
It has no jurisdiction on sovereignty.
Another question you fail to comprehend....before your EEZ, it already belongs to China. PH is using UNCLOS as an excuse to take something that does not belong to them.
Not it doesn't, the NATO Tribunal doesn't have the Statutory Authority to decide on any Territorial Sovereignty.
ua-cam.com/video/yXkqgDDIVeE/v-deo.htmlsi=7b90uRiAWUzZWSE1
Luckily there are recordings of the Agreement made between China and the Philippines allowing for Supplies to Troops aboard the Wreck.
what do you want china law? you lack nurturing and education.
The evidence is noy true becuase they came in the philippines for barter change in thay area there is native filipino living in the small islands and that was also recorded in the philippines
Buti p c Pinoy, my naiwan n legacy, at ngmarka s mga intsik. 1, standoff s panatag shoal. 2 mga FA50 aircraft at ika-3 2016 arbitral ruling. C PBBM Kya?. Hanggang ngaun wla PNG mapatunayan. Halos kalahati n cya s pwesto. Mukhang wla nmn tlaga magiging legacy o mgmamarka s kadaysayan
So we are celebrating the fact that for 8 years we are begging China to please follow the international orbital ruling and we are calling this big news question mark and we are proud of it ? This is absolutely baliw ! Oh God In The Name of Jesus please save the Philippines now 🇺🇲💖🇵🇭
Apakah Anda ingin Tiongkok menyerahkan kedaulatannya? ? ? Mintalah ayah Amerikamu untuk menyerahkan tanah yang dia rampas dari luar negeri sampai ke Alaska dan Hawaii? ? ?
if you want to know, you should ask America.😂😂😂
Stop spreading miss leading information on Taiwan. 9 dash line were from Republic of China (Taiwan) and been recognise by Taiwan. And those Island dispute with Japan were part of Taiwan that Japan don’t dispute with but only to PRC (China). So please don’t drag Taiwan into the 9 dash line with China. As Taiwan stand same stand with China on this. And so is other claim on islands with Japan. Any attempt not to agree with that is consider traitor be it from blue camp or green camp.
The dash line was original 11 dash line was drawn by Taiwan. The ROC government.
@@wionporky9937 exactly. But that time is 9 dash line at the time. And it was recognise by UN by that time back in 1947
@@seekersoul3439Nope, the UN didn’t recognized that Chinese fictitious Historical Bullshit Claims in South China Sea. Don’t spread Falsehoods and Fake Chinese Information here.
the decision was made by the admin office... not the judicial court... it never made it to court... only the philippines selected the jurors... these was the main reason why china refused to accept the outcome of the tentative ruling.
also if you go the usa, uk, etc. public records... it clearly states china have the right to the 9 dash line. the new 10th line was part of taiwan and taiwan is a province of china...taiwan is not a country... this is also in the usa, uk, etc. public records...
the map by the spanish cartographer shows the island is not part of the phillipines...
irish professor carty actually wrote a book based on these facts...
so philippines cant claim the islands...
wow, bunch of lies
@@veerand7038
so you dont have the courage to do your own research?! it is super simple...since it is public records!
if you dont wanna do your own research...just go read the book by irish professor carty!
next time please read and understand what you read before replying back so you dont embarrass yourself in the public to become public records!
@@yehuo2825 who's cartographer your talking about? if its Velarde then you are talking lies. Ofcourse, Carty who is being fed by China is the best source of yours. you're the one that needs to stop embarrassing yourself, the 2016 arbitral ruling is final and legally binding. Carty also talked about pursuing China's legality in SCS but China never went to a Court, I wonder why? Probably because it knows it will lose everytime.
blabla bullshit
China's sovereignty and historic rights in the South China Sea are based on its long-term history of management and administration of the islands in the sea and the adjacent waters. They are also consistent with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Successive dynasties or governments since the Tang Dynasty (618-907) effectively controlled and administered the South China Sea islands and the related waters. Successive Chinese governments asserted sovereignty over the islands and reefs within the nine-dash line of the South China Sea, as well as developed and managed resources within the line, which constituted exclusive rights to the waters of the South China Sea
The Chinese have long engaged in fishing and other productive activities in the South China Sea, which is an important waterway for Chinese ships. Since the Han Dynasty (202BC-220AD), they began to make use of the resources of the sea, passing through it. These practices constitute the basic facts of China's long-term administration and passage in the South China Sea.
The sovereignty has also been recognized by other countries. For a long time after World War II, Vietnam, the Philippines and other neighboring countries did not object to China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and the nine-dash line. Many other countries and international organizations also recognized or acquiesced to it. This is supported by a large number of foreign official documents and publications, as well as government archives, including those of Vietnam, the Philippines, the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan.
Since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the Chinese government has exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over the South China Sea by issuing government documents and diplomatic statements, promulgating domestic laws, asserting sovereignty over the South China Sea with abundant evidence.
On the other hand, as an illegal claimant in the South China Sea dispute, the Philippines' position has been based on a completely wrong foundation from the beginning. The information provided by the Philippines on the islands and reefs and its claims are full of false information and false descriptions, and there are many inconsistent and self-contradictory statements. The Philippines had never raised territorial claims on the Nansha Islands before the 1970s.
The nine-dash line, a heritage, is frequently questioned and attacked by the Philippines. In China, the drawing of dotted lines in the South China Sea began in the early 20th century. At that time, the maps compiled by private individuals first used dotted or continuous lines to show China's territory scope in the sea.
In the 1930s, the government of the Republic of China began to standardize and manage map publishing. They established the Land and Waters Map Review Committee to examine the maps. In January 1935, the committee published the Map of Islands in the South China Sea, standardizing the names of 132 islands, reefs, sands and beaches. This was the first case of the Chinese government officially mapping the South China Sea islands in modern history.
After World War II, in accordance with the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and other international legal documents, China resumed the exercise of sovereignty of islands in the South China Sea. In February 1948, the Interior Ministry of the Republic of China publicly issued the Location Map of South China Sea Islands. It was the first time that the Chinese government drew a U-shaped line in the South China Sea on an officially published map, demonstrating to the international community its sovereignty over the sea.
After 1949, the new Chinese government inherited this line and made appropriate adjustments to make it the nine-dash line we know today.
From then until the 1970s, the neighboring countries, including the Philippines, and the international community did not raise any objections to China's territorial sovereignty.
All official maps published by China after 1949 show this line, which clearly defines China's territorial sovereignty over the South China Sea islands within the line and its historic rights in the waters within the line.
it is not the law of china that will be obeyed
UNCLOS Article 89 : No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its soverignty. End of discussion.
Who are you to invalidate the UN ruling
Beberapa tanah ayah Anda yang orang Amerika berjarak ribuan kilometer jauhnya. Apakah Anda keberatan dengan kenyataan bahwa tanah yang ia curi dari luar negeri berjarak ribuan kilometer? ?
Sekelompok bandit dari Filipina ingin merampok tanah Tiongkok. Jika Anda memiliki keterampilan, datang dan rampok mereka dan lihat apa yang dapat Anda lakukan.
Apakah ini komunitas internasional? ? Kekuatan kolonial Barat adalah gelar mereka?
Atin ang west Philippines 🇵🇭 sea,
Filipina itu orangnya paling banyak bicara. Hahaha, masih berani mengeluh kalau sudah menggantikan posisi orang lain? ? ? ?
Another bot