A big component I feel is overlooked is bonding amongst men in such environments and cohesion breaks down when women are introduced. When I was in Germany (2SCR) we had a female attached to our platoon for her field interrogation MOS. Men started peacocking and getting into squabbles over it. She ended up having sex with a few and egos got the best of them. Instead of focusing on combat training they were distracted by who was going to fuck who with a few butt hurt soldiers over it. Personally I feel the best way for female infantry to best succeed is to be in all female units (or at least their own platoon). I think this will further alleviate to some degree the concern of being able to lift up and carry wounded soldiers. I could go at nauseum but I think this is a sufficient post.
For the tiny number of women who can honestly meet the standards and who want to, you have to weigh any benefit they bring against the disruption and cohesion of the unit. I don't think it makes sense.
100% agreed with you. At the end of the day, you want everyone comes back home safely. As long as an individual can carry out the tasks successfully, that's all that matter. Stick with the standard of training and vigorously enforce it.
If they want to serve in combat roles they can serve in all female combat roles for two reason. 1 they can’t carry me out of a battle field. Or they can’t carry the heaviest man in her unit and she should have to be able to. She can’t say “Hey I know I’m back here a half mile by 250lb Leroy, but I need you to hike back through enemy fire and pick him up” and #2 is this. If women are not capable or confident enough to serve in combat without the protection of men then that In itself proves what we all need to know. However I can not saying that I do not thank them for their service. By all means, thank you. If they are willing to die for the country, no one can say a bad word about that but there WILL NOT BE ANY MAN WHO WILL BE WILLING TO DIE SIMPLY BECAUSE THE PERSON NEXT TO THEM IS A WOMEN. If it’s proven it endangers the lives of men then no man should have to serve in a combat situation beside her. We get 1 life! And I signed up to be picked up and drug out off my death bed by other men, not left to die because you can’t carry me cause you are a woman. Let’s keep it 💯! Yes there are many roles women can serve and do great. But infantry combat & especially special ops is not one of them unless it’s all female units. We all support that! Hell it’s less we get shot at the more that their are. Think about that last sentence because that’s REAL!
I really don't think it's a smart idea to have Women in the infantry. I could maybe see Artillery or something that isn't likely to engage in close combat, but Infantry? It's just not a smart idea. If China, Russia, Pakistan, Venezuela, North Korea, and Iran aren't busy integrating Women in combat units on the scale and speed that we are, then WHY should we do it? There isn't a logical reason. However, I DO think the Marine Corps could do a better job at one, making sure male infantry Marines are in better shape than they are currently required or expected to be, and two, exposing or offering more cool opportunities to female Marines that actually want to do cool shit. I can't speak for the Army, but for the Marine Corps, we already have a freakin' DECENT amount of "cool guy" opportunities that aren't infantry, but they are certainly cool enough to satisfy an individual's personal desires while still making sure the organization is as efficient as possible. For example, we could make male Marines pt everyday in ITB, so that when they graduate and get to the fleet, they're in much better shape than they were in previous ITB cycles because for two months, these Marines were consistently exercising (with respect for ftx's and other situations where they can't pt). We could make the intermediate swim qual a new mandatory requirement, which is not only tougher than the basic swim qual, but it also better replicates conducting a scout swimmer insertion to recon a beach. Then, all your Marines would be able to swim as well as the Marines in a boat company. Now, look at females. Imagine enlisting as a female, and your MOS is MP. You go to PMO, you decide you want to get more hands on with weapons, and so you become a range coach. Later, you decide to become a dog handler, and then you reenlist and go MSG, which deals with weapons and security anyway. After your tour on MSG, say you get picked up by MARSOC because you were such a good dog handler, and now you can say you were in MARSOC as SOCS doing K-9 work. While you were there in MARSOC, you decided you wanted to get better at hand to hand combat, so you became an MAI. You would have all those accomplishments under your belt WHILE possessing an MOS that is nowhere near as "uncool" as kicking boxes in a warehouse. That's more than decent, that's damn good. I would bring back the Law Enforcement Battalions as a model unit for males and females alike that want to do cool stuff while still being a pog. I mean, compared to PMO, LE Bn goes to the field more and just operates in a much more tactical manner than PMO does. From there, besides dog handlers, I would honestly create a Designated Marksman position as a sort of faux sniper, and let males and females alike go through the course, provided they are top shooters and excellent Marines in garrison as well as the field. You could even go so far as to move SRT to the LE Bns and let females try out (if they can't already). Then, everyone wins.
I'm a little guy, I would struggle to keep up with special forces but I would make a good soldier. I've been humbled by tough women in physical work but never a fight.
Men sacrifice there lives, women create the new generation to sacrifice for the idea, if women take on men’s roles and men cannot create a new generation we ultimately lose due to attrition. It’s not a matter of can they as if your invaded it’s all hands to the pump and all fight, but it is a matter of should they, especially with our low birth rates.
Yes cause women in military and police are too selfish false accusers evil they are and man haters i don't know why they hire them it's like a self righteous little kid see this and wants the great white throne to magnify over men it's happening women military and cops are more worshipped like angels than we are and regard them as true warriors than men and as this called first and second wave now extinct it's now third and fourth wave in eighties first and second were bad enough their third and fourth wave cousins but worse they bombed post offices and stuff in 1800s and before WW1 causing war and versallies by Wilson but now still around but going extinct or evolving into third wave like German empire some of them became the wemire republic to national socialist right first and second some of them to third and fourth wave like they got our jobs to be equal but dropping our population down making civilian and others becoming third and fourth wave my sister dancing ape doing o say okay like homurous apes animation computerized on video singing and dancing to that song well if there were no men around and just fake joose and their women cousins they would be dancing apes we got to stop this even gynocentrism they caused and false accusation by getting at root of problem by signing change .org name ban and stop feminism all together cause like little kids let in doing gods work acting like Satan to prove who can marry damage their kids if single etc dropping population etc yes population is too independent on bothsides it should stop they dropping populations mgtow going their own and women magnifying men for that manifocation of women even these called feminent dumb and Stupids and cuck and simp instead of mutual women like civilian mutual not simps but thinking were dumping they got it wrong yes some men simp out there but not all of us though but damage done i singed petition next censorship petition and 19 admendment which is not really part of the constitution of 1700s it was 1900s versallies Wilson that put that there as part of Versailles we need to change constitution back to original with no added errors like happened in 1900s it's like adding and taking away from bible we need constitution back to original
*"Ruthlessly hold the standards."*
Therein lies the problem -- the standards won't be held.
A big component I feel is overlooked is bonding amongst men in such environments and cohesion breaks down when women are introduced.
When I was in Germany (2SCR) we had a female attached to our platoon for her field interrogation MOS.
Men started peacocking and getting into squabbles over it. She ended up having sex with a few and egos got the best of them. Instead of focusing on combat training they were distracted by who was going to fuck who with a few butt hurt soldiers over it.
Personally I feel the best way for female infantry to best succeed is to be in all female units (or at least their own platoon). I think this will further alleviate to some degree the concern of being able to lift up and carry wounded soldiers.
I could go at nauseum but I think this is a sufficient post.
great comment, agreed.
as a women, I appreciate your video
For the tiny number of women who can honestly meet the standards and who want to, you have to weigh any benefit they bring against the disruption and cohesion of the unit. I don't think it makes sense.
100% agreed with you. At the end of the day, you want everyone comes back home safely. As long as an individual can carry out the tasks successfully, that's all that matter. Stick with the standard of training and vigorously enforce it.
It's the only thing that makes sense.
excellent thorough exposition.
If they want to serve in combat roles they can serve in all female combat roles for two reason. 1 they can’t carry me out of a battle field. Or they can’t carry the heaviest man in her unit and she should have to be able to. She can’t say “Hey I know I’m back here a half mile by 250lb Leroy, but I need you to hike back through enemy fire and pick him up” and #2 is this. If women are not capable or confident enough to serve in combat without the protection of men then that In itself proves what we all need to know. However I can not saying that I do not thank them for their service. By all means, thank you. If they are willing to die for the country, no one can say a bad word about that but there WILL NOT BE ANY MAN WHO WILL BE WILLING TO DIE SIMPLY BECAUSE THE PERSON NEXT TO THEM IS A WOMEN. If it’s proven it endangers the lives of men then no man should have to serve in a combat situation beside her. We get 1 life! And I signed up to be picked up and drug out off my death bed by other men, not left to die because you can’t carry me cause you are a woman. Let’s keep it 💯! Yes there are many roles women can serve and do great. But infantry combat & especially special ops is not one of them unless it’s all female units. We all support that! Hell it’s less we get shot at the more that their are. Think about that last sentence because that’s REAL!
What about a woman who can carry you?
@@TierThreeTactical women carry mankind as a whole through there ability to create others, a more important task than being part of the warrior class.
I really don't think it's a smart idea to have Women in the infantry. I could maybe see Artillery or something that isn't likely to engage in close combat, but Infantry? It's just not a smart idea. If China, Russia, Pakistan, Venezuela, North Korea, and Iran aren't busy integrating Women in combat units on the scale and speed that we are, then WHY should we do it? There isn't a logical reason.
However, I DO think the Marine Corps could do a better job at one, making sure male infantry Marines are in better shape than they are currently required or expected to be, and two, exposing or offering more cool opportunities to female Marines that actually want to do cool shit. I can't speak for the Army, but for the Marine Corps, we already have a freakin' DECENT amount of "cool guy" opportunities that aren't infantry, but they are certainly cool enough to satisfy an individual's personal desires while still making sure the organization is as efficient as possible. For example, we could make male Marines pt everyday in ITB, so that when they graduate and get to the fleet, they're in much better shape than they were in previous ITB cycles because for two months, these Marines were consistently exercising (with respect for ftx's and other situations where they can't pt). We could make the intermediate swim qual a new mandatory requirement, which is not only tougher than the basic swim qual, but it also better replicates conducting a scout swimmer insertion to recon a beach. Then, all your Marines would be able to swim as well as the Marines in a boat company. Now, look at females. Imagine enlisting as a female, and your MOS is MP. You go to PMO, you decide you want to get more hands on with weapons, and so you become a range coach. Later, you decide to become a dog handler, and then you reenlist and go MSG, which deals with weapons and security anyway. After your tour on MSG, say you get picked up by MARSOC because you were such a good dog handler, and now you can say you were in MARSOC as SOCS doing K-9 work. While you were there in MARSOC, you decided you wanted to get better at hand to hand combat, so you became an MAI. You would have all those accomplishments under your belt WHILE possessing an MOS that is nowhere near as "uncool" as kicking boxes in a warehouse. That's more than decent, that's damn good.
I would bring back the Law Enforcement Battalions as a model unit for males and females alike that want to do cool stuff while still being a pog. I mean, compared to PMO, LE Bn goes to the field more and just operates in a much more tactical manner than PMO does. From there, besides dog handlers, I would honestly create a Designated Marksman position as a sort of faux sniper, and let males and females alike go through the course, provided they are top shooters and excellent Marines in garrison as well as the field. You could even go so far as to move SRT to the LE Bns and let females try out (if they can't already). Then, everyone wins.
I'm a little guy, I would struggle to keep up with special forces but I would make a good soldier. I've been humbled by tough women in physical work but never a fight.
How many women have you fought and why did you fight them?
@fokkerfilms560 I said never in a fight. Do you understand what "never" means? I'm sorry for your struggle with the English language.
gona have to lighten everything
Men sacrifice there lives, women create the new generation to sacrifice for the idea, if women take on men’s roles and men cannot create a new generation we ultimately lose due to attrition.
It’s not a matter of can they as if your invaded it’s all hands to the pump and all fight, but it is a matter of should they, especially with our low birth rates.
Bruh I like how even on a video comment section where you'd think people would agree with you apparently nobody does.
Yes cause women in military and police are too selfish false accusers evil they are and man haters i don't know why they hire them it's like a self righteous little kid see this and wants the great white throne to magnify over men it's happening women military and cops are more worshipped like angels than we are and regard them as true warriors than men and as this called first and second wave now extinct it's now third and fourth wave in eighties first and second were bad enough their third and fourth wave cousins but worse they bombed post offices and stuff in 1800s and before WW1 causing war and versallies by Wilson but now still around but going extinct or evolving into third wave like German empire some of them became the wemire republic to national socialist right first and second some of them to third and fourth wave like they got our jobs to be equal but dropping our population down making civilian and others becoming third and fourth wave my sister dancing ape doing o say okay like homurous apes animation computerized on video singing and dancing to that song well if there were no men around and just fake joose and their women cousins they would be dancing apes we got to stop this even gynocentrism they caused and false accusation by getting at root of problem by signing change .org name ban and stop feminism all together cause like little kids let in doing gods work acting like Satan to prove who can marry damage their kids if single etc dropping population etc yes population is too independent on bothsides it should stop they dropping populations mgtow going their own and women magnifying men for that manifocation of women even these called feminent dumb and Stupids and cuck and simp instead of mutual women like civilian mutual not simps but thinking were dumping they got it wrong yes some men simp out there but not all of us though but damage done i singed petition next censorship petition and 19 admendment which is not really part of the constitution of 1700s it was 1900s versallies Wilson that put that there as part of Versailles we need to change constitution back to original with no added errors like happened in 1900s it's like adding and taking away from bible we need constitution back to original