Specifically why the Woodleigh ITH and Punggol Coast bus routes are designed like that

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @zbkvolgren
    @zbkvolgren  9 днів тому

    5:55 correction
    is via hougang avenue 3, hougang street 12, hougang avenue 13

  • @fabianchiok9575
    @fabianchiok9575 11 днів тому +1

    82 often sees significant pax demand at the loop point stop, so it's good that they are retaining that sector on the returning trip when extended

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  11 днів тому +1

      forest woods bus stop can just skip
      so it's better to retain both s'goon central and boundary road for both 81 and 82
      you make it go straight it's gonna duplicate 107 lol

  • @TRANSLASLionsCityMovia
    @TRANSLASLionsCityMovia 11 днів тому +1

    Upper Serangoon Road tbh, too many bus services..... Hence, one service can liao.
    But if 104 go full SD, later 43 will cry again 😂
    Will 115 be cut/merge with 146 or 115 stay?

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  11 днів тому +2

      146 doesn't even touch Hougang Avenue 3 so why would 115 even be cut in the first place
      43 alr got SD downgrades anyway so I don't see how 104 SD is a big deal

  • @TIB1106EProductions
    @TIB1106EProductions 10 днів тому +2

    Whats the point of having 34e? I requested for 858e and 969e and both got rejected with reason being both alr ply mostly express routes but isnt having 34e having another 858 but with express fares? Sounds dumb

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  10 днів тому +2

      CRLe interim service that is going into the bin if demand isn't sustainable after MRT opening
      they don't want to intro 858e and 969e (like as permanent services) cos they're super particular about farebox recovery rate
      express sectors are considered dead mileage according to them so they worsen the FRR
      the only expressway service with over 100% FRR (profiting in other words) is 89e, even if you take into account that 89's FRR is often under reported and 89e being over reported - since 89e's fleet is like "subcon" from 89

  • @TravelTransport985
    @TravelTransport985 9 днів тому +1

    what program are you using to draw on the map, I want to try something similar to this

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  9 днів тому

      Nothing special I'm just very very very low budget 😂
      Microsoft powerpoint and Draw tool and I record directly from my phone

    • @thetampinesbusenthusiast
      @thetampinesbusenthusiast 8 днів тому

      @@zbkvolgren😂

  • @WLTransit100
    @WLTransit100 11 днів тому

    34 skip Punggol MRT? what about the Punggol Road sector served only by 34? residents need to take Punggol Central bus service instead?

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  11 днів тому +1

      cos it's highly unlikely that they make 34 go teck lee or northshore (any amendment to 34 would affect 34e too)
      if you do that you have to push 104 to cover new punggol road instead of northshore
      i'm only sure of 117 and 383's routes

  • @YaoboyProd2K15
    @YaoboyProd2K15 11 днів тому +1

    43M to 104?

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  11 днів тому

      i alr mentioned many times lol

  • @ababalalalaui9792
    @ababalalalaui9792 9 днів тому

    uk what good informational vid'

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  9 днів тому +1

      Is there anything else in particular regarding route amendments or history of SG bus that you'd like to know (if any)

    • @ababalalalaui9792
      @ababalalalaui9792 9 днів тому

      @ honestly i just found yr channel so itsokay~
      keep up the informational videos btw!!! i rly enjoy it so far

  • @ikywTROUBLE
    @ikywTROUBLE 10 днів тому +1

    This are predictions?

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  10 днів тому +1

      how many times do i have to say it omg 😂
      all of these are already internally confirmed just that i don't know the exact routings
      i NEVER predict stuff

  • @ltz1437
    @ltz1437 10 днів тому

    113 should extend to serangoon central... can withdraw 53M

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  10 днів тому +1

      Only possible if you make drastic road configurations to Hougang St 11 and Upper Paya Lebar Road junction (it's left in left out)
      otherwise you can only serve St 11 towards Hougang

    • @zbkvolgren
      @zbkvolgren  10 днів тому

      Since Hougang St 11 is both double decker and bendy bus restricted
      You have to run single deckers at super high frequencies if you combine 53M and 113 - if you have the resources and demand to sustain it (just like svc142 and 238) then i think it's worth a go

    • @ltz1437
      @ltz1437 10 днів тому

      @ oh yes cannot make right turn.. then extend 119