Відео

film already

LCS u got video alr so i not falm

106 972M 190 963/966

@@zbkvolgren oh

H is for hospital not harris ment

This is a history lesson right here, this 146 ain't the current iteration.

@@andrewsim7132 my friend is just playing with me 😂

the old route not interesting i not going to do it

952 doesn't even go petir pending

960 goes woodlands road 952 doesn't that's 182

@@zbkvolgren then it is 960e?

i didn't ride 960e

ええ 😮 常に このバスは他のドア式 使ってる? どの式?

@@zbkvolgren ドア式は詳しくないけど 多分普通のエルガのドア式ですね エアロスター式は両側にドアが開くけど エルガ式は片方にドアがまとまる

@@To-buBus ああ気になった 新しいエアロスター全てアクリル板付いてる エルガ何台かアクリルあり何台かなし

there are no plans to remove bus svcs from sbw int

i was told will touch 103 and 117 will touch melody springs but idk which road will offload 117 if you want the correct route you can try spotting the 861 TRG cos TRG alr started idk if terminate at bus int or deadhead somewhere

@@zbkvolgren Oh must be why I keep seeing TTS bus in Ave 4, it always been DD tho. hmm then maybe Sembawang still hv space after all (its better to terminate at an interchange than outside MRT station)

sry i wrong is actually st 41 ave 1 st 42 ave 6 ave 7 canberra mrt then copy 883 without going sbw mrt louzy svc never serve ave 4

@@zbkvolgren oh no… but i hope 802 will, if not what those TTS TRG buses?

“Some svc will be cut from Sembawang” Oh boy I’m willing to bet it’s either 167 or 980 getting the boot; 859 can’t probably because of the YITH issue

no there are no plans to remove bus svc from sbw int

861 alr got TTS TRG

@@zbkvolgren Huat ah

@@sgstuff1152 sry i wrong is actually via st 41 st 42 ave 6 ave 7

850E 960 187 960e never spawn wright

@@zbkvolgren oh ok

快速急行180

232 57 159

@@zbkvolgren oh ok

173 elizabeth drive (hillview) - new bridge 205 clementi - jalan anak bukit merger

@@zbkvolgren oh ok

that building TOP jan 2025

one motoring vaguely say the road finish by Q4 2024

@@zbkvolgren oh i see…

285 282

cos lta thinks r151 is better and SIE KNS spare part availability becomes ahem 😂

@@zbkvolgren 15 years later we might end up with the same conversation 😂😂

oh noer c151a no more spare parts ! ! ! ! !

@@zbkvolgren Maybe C151B first, C151A did return to China for C S then rebuild

73 231

yes

it's still quite inaccessible lol 😂

@@zbkvolgren lol yea!

did you watch the video

pay close attention to the video 😂 i did this in one attempt

@@zbkvolgren I can't tell where you switched buses, but I'm sure it's only possible if it's done on 3 services today.

506 -> 59 -> 21 -> jumpcut cos 228 no DD -> any bus that goes to Bedok North Avenue 3 -> 45 -> 25 there was a jumpcut at bedok reservoir rd -> nth ave 3 and i skipped a sector in between stops along bedok nth ave 3 cos i alighted from 46 and ran to the bus stop in front in order to get a 45 wright before my phone battery C S

the real challenge is camping for wright on every service for consistency the wrights just refused to spawn on 28, 67, 69, 168 so i had no choice but to take 46 and skip one bus stop (cos 46 goes bedok north road) 😂 AAAAA I ALMOST SUCCEEDED if only my phone could last a little longer but i didn't want to risk not getting a 45 wright

@@zbkvolgren That's tough!

now 282 285 333 334 335 801 882 941 947 have them 😂 the DDs on 335 have to turn really slowly from JW St 51 to 52, roads are so narrow

@@zbkvolgren Yes, those that used to not have them had relatively tight turns. 285 did have DDs even when it was with SBS Transit, famous 9889U ran one trip before.

195 871 945 are bendy approved but not DD approved 😂 cos some roads bendy turns better than DD in fact for the feeders only 285 and 334 are actually suited for DD 222 225 241 (243?) use DD cos no choice those turns DD can clear but not bendy

@@zbkvolgren The mindset was quite rigid in the TIBS/SBS days. They did not really think that far beyond what they already have on hand. The most apparent of this was 190.

now NEL is struggling cos SBS Transit cut way too many svcs in 2003 😂 sbst made 506 express for no good reason LOL 190 thankfully 972/M relieved most of its demand

actually for voices people tend to not care about it a lot of the front view filmers leave the voice unfiltered but yes it's only a big issue if name/ID are exposed without their consent

on a good note most of the young people in Japan and SG give me hope cos they actually understand all the nuances of it ironically the 肖像権 thing was started by the older millennials