Bulldozer was pretty much a failure from day one. Almost no improvement to ipc despite the process node shrink, a max temp as low as 57 C on some cpus, and heavy power consumption. All it really had going for it was high clock speeds, core count, and pricing. It was significantly behind sandy bridge.
@@mixedup5858 Yes. She joined in 2014 when Zen and Ryzen were starting and she was the head of Ryzen department. She than become the CEO right before Ryzen launch
Core wars episode 1: The Phenom Menace Core wars episode 2: Attack of the FX Core wars episode 3: Revenge of the Haswells Core wars episode 4: A new AMD Core wars episode 5: Intel Strikes Back Core wars episode 6: Return of the Athlon
Exactly, @@TechTators. Intel even had that industrial espionage thing against AMD for decades. Once that ended AMD came out swinging and did not stop fighting.
Lol. I have seen people asking me where is my Intel Inside processor in my Intel Processor Evolution video comments. They don't even know what Intel processor they have. They just see Intel inside and assume it's good.
As my professor said: "AMD is always going to be a better product because they focus on the product itself, not in the crappy marketing and advertisement".
I feel like an idiot for buying the i9 - 9900k processor for my first rig. If only I had done proper research a month prior and I would end up with a little more money left on the bank account and a better processor.
Frozen Trip i went with a ryzen 5 1600x three yers ago. Never regretted it. Now I’m upgrading to a ryzen 7 3700X. BTW, the i9-9900k isn’t that bad of a product.
@@mukunddhar6657 Yeah it's not, but what frustrates me is that I had the money to buy a really good processor. Instead of doing some research about ehich one is better I let brand loyalty get the better of me. Will definitely consider switching to AMD in a couple of years. Probably will have to buy a new motherboard too but what the heck.
@@spangus1469 and im from Intel user before i use MSI ge63 with i7 8750h 1060 and bought new laptop Legion with AMD Ryzen 5 4600h, damn Ryzen 5 4600h is so better than i7 8750h and its more low Temps than Intel, that the main reason i sell my MSI GE63 8 RE its too damn HOT, oh i forgot to mention with Legion i5 (intel) and Legion 5 Amd AMD legion 5 is less expensive like 100$ and better spec and the other hand Intel Variant legion i5 is i5 gen 10 with 4 cores and i test it on store its performance meh, so i pick Legion AMD. my next Laptop will be AMD CPU better value and specs!
its true, intel always overprice their own processors for no reason, which makes intel a gold digger. meanwhile when amd is always offering competitive perfomance at low prices.
ok in your place intel is cheaper, but in mine its 10x times more expensive, and i saw your other comments saying that intel's cpus were cooler in temps ok ok u rlly want to use the stock cooler of intel, that thing wont cool anything, with my new ryzen build its 30° idle and it can go lower (wraith aspire rgb) note im using the stock cooler
Wait, when did the bring in 7nm. I thought they were on 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
@@KanyeIsKing yeah I know it was a bad joke. I was just itching to say it. It's like AMD will be on 5nm in 2 years(possibly more or less) and Intel delays 7nm again to 2022
impressive to see that amd always was the one introducing new tecnologies. first 1 ghz processor, first 64 bits processor, first 32, 48 and 64 cores, not to mention that they always tried bringing more cores to the mainstream like they are doing today with the first 6, 8, 12 and 16 cores mainstream processors. while intel was keeping the market at a shit dual to quad core processors. thanks amd!
@@JorgetePanete Please, just shut the fuck up. Nobody needs grammar nazis in the internet, you're correcting the person over the simplest mistakes. If you wanna be a grammar nazi, at least look for reasonable mistakes dipshit.
Don't pity Intel Intel been busy Milking the Market dry by any means possible for years I was one of the victim "you don't need more than 4 cores", "Intel wins on Gaming benchmarks", I'm very ashamed i said that, no more.
Don't worry now both AMD and Intel are milking the market and in general, the CPU market has been milked since 2008 and for GPUs both AMD and Nvidia have been milking the market since 2011.
@@rattlehead999 for GPU.. nah.. amd still eating the smoke from Nv.. in cpu department amd does have a lil bit upper hand.. i said a lil bit because the Laptop market is still saturated by Intel
@@5at5una AMD has a vastly superior architecture to Nvidia when it comes to GPUs, CPU-wise it's a bit better than Intel. Also Intel dominates the Laptop market as they have long-lasting contracts with tons of laptop companies and they have a much bigger production volume than AMD. AMD is limited to only a small part of TSMC's production as TSMC has to serve Apple, IBM, along with AMD and a dozen other companies.
@@rattlehead999 even with vast architecture... still cant outperform Nv and still way behind in market.. really wish for better GPU with less issues.. since current GPU still bugged with its Enchanced sync and black screen.. i cant play monster hunter for month on my rx5700 because of the black screen until they patched it out.. really mad about it since there was an event going on... and i miss out a lot when my friend have been farming it
@@5at5una Well keep in mind AMD went greedy last year with the release of the rx 5000 seires and ryzen 3000 series, their profit margins doubled. The RX 5700XT is a SUB-mid range GPU(251mm^2 die size), that should have costed 300$ MSRP at launch, but AMD went for 46% profit margin and sold it at 400$ MSRP. Still can't compare to the sub-mid range gtx 1080(312mm^2 die size) in 2016 for 700$ at 138% profit margin. Otherwise, AMD couldn't beat Pascal with GCN(Polaris/Vega) because Global Foundry's 12/14nm was dog shit compared to TSMC's 12/16nm.
One thing I loved to see here - that brand consistency since the 80's. Intel fell for the 90's aesthetic (I call in the "FRIENDS" font - with Intel Inside). It's so awesome to see.
*AMD* Processors Are More PowerFull Then *INTEL* Intel Is Good But AMD Is Best And The Fun Fact Is *AMD is offering compititive perfomance at low price*
@@firkinflamer amd was always crap you stupid prick, if amd was soo good then my friends laptop with a amd a4 quad core would be faster then an i7 m series cpu. amd is a joke... intel is the only way to go...
@@a.v.81 Hey my first cpu amd 486 100mhz i overclocked it to 120mhz ( with jumpers on motherboard ) but it didn't wanted to wakeup on 150mhz lol ... 16 mb ram , 800 mb hdd, cirus logic gpu ( not 3d accelerator just 2d chip ), speakers stereo and 14" monitor 1024x800 43hz lol or 800x600 200hz lol but weeeery dark picture on that color monitor... I miss it now eeeeeh.. If i only had money than i would not sold it but would maxed it out and still have it!!! With turbo high speed button it worked much faster than in low speed mode ( button on mini tower ). My next comp was amd athlon 1600+ if memory serves coz of my father: me - "dad i need i new comp", and my dad - " you have one! you only think to play videogames! What do you want new comp? To play even more videogames?" ...Well... now its God me comp and devil vs the world ( its a joke btw :D )!!! I love computers but that only tryes to fill void which is already there. :D
How they're a bit of an underdog, fighting a war on 2 fronts, fighting Nvidia with their Radeon lineup of GPUs, which are quite competent value/budget GPUs, and Intel with their Zen-based CPU lineup that, while it's not better for solely gaming, very solid value CPUs that do better in everything else compared to Intel processors. You could make the argument that they're beating their competitors, in a way.
@@rickylafleur5823 Hahaah finally you're idiot? Almost all AMD CPUs when got compared with intel prove to be more efficient! I had myself Intel products and also AMD. When Compared AMD always brought me better results! You don't need to be a fanboy to prove that a company was over 30 years better than Intel!
I have had most of their consumer based CPUs since the K6-2, and still have them, AMD has usually had much more competitive prices vs Intel, and much of the time performed as good, or better... except in the FX line, but it wasn't a terrible processor
Yeah.. 2011 to 2017 is best forgotten from AMDs point of view. AMD let Intel gain significant market share from the launch of FX series in 2011 till the Ryzen family is launched. I have always been a Intel fan. I jumped to AMD's bandwagon just a month ago with the Ryzen 3800x and it is one of the best decision I made.
@@theunconventionaldeal3879 I had an overclocked k6-2 that was killing my friend's Intel pentium was even hanging with the pentium 4 non hyperthreaded chips, but was getting quite old by then lol.... I still have that chip
A lot of tech/PC channels have re-tested or benchmarked the FX Piledriver and found that it performs much better these days then it did when it was first released, something to do with more programs these days are multithreaded.
@@TechTators I stopped being a fan of Intel back in the 90's when they wouldn't sell the company I worked for CPU's unless it was an exclusive deal, wasn't one AMD processor used for anything.
1:16 That Kryptonite has Ryzen! Deep! Intel should have seen it coming when they were too busy counting peoples hard earned money.... Ripped the Threads off!
@@jaquan123ism i think below 7nm isnt possible bc of quantum physics, so we probably need to wait for a new invention before processors become even more powerful on the same space.
Woah, woah hold your horses from 2005? Amd never created a cpu that can go at par on any quad core or core 2 duo in terms of performance even some xeon can kick amd turion up to the a-series even if on a very very low price. What the heck are you on? Zen series is the only 1 who save amd to oblivion.
Reality check. AMD started kicking Intel's sometime after the release of the Athlon, so shortly after 1999. With the 2007 release of phenom(1), AMD couldn't complete with Intel's new core. Phenom2 fixed most of the fail, but had to go against core2 (Sandy bridge) and got it's ass kicked as well. Zen (2017, ryzen1xxx) may have achieved desktop parity, with aurpremacy happening with either zen+ or zen2 depending on how you look at it. But this isn't 1999-2007 and the desktop is now an afterthought (not including laptops as "desktop"). Just now with a second generation of powerful and reliable servers and an amazing "ryzen 4000" laptop chip, Intel is finally once again feeling that old boot from behind.
In the early to mid 2000 it was quite competitive against the P4 and Intel was doing shady stuff in the late 90's to prevent amd from gaining more terrain.
My old pc have that Athlon 64 X2, I used that pc from 2008 to 2017, with an gt9500 1gb the first 4 years, and in 2012 I bought an GTX 650, that goddamn pc always performance so damn well, until my motherboard died on 2017. I build an new pc this year with an Ryzen 5 2600 and GTX 1660 Super, I hope I can upgrade to an RTX card in next year. uwu
Been an AMD user since mid 90's . They always had the best price\performance ratio. I never built a system with the latest, most expensive components, always the mid choices.
Honestly had no idea that AMD had been around for 45 years now; I honestly thought they'd only been around since the Pentium days. Didn't even know they had an 80486 equivalent. I mean, I knew that AMD was one of intel's chief co-producers at one point, but holy crap lol So nice to see my boys in red pullin' ahead in the races nowadays. First modern computer I ever built (thanks to a friend's dad) was an AMD K7 at a whopping 1.05GHz. Prior to that, all the machines my dad and I ever cobbled together from tree belt finds were all intel-based (80386, 80486, Pentium line). But I've been a fan of AMD ever since that little K7 processor. I'm now sitting pretty with an FX-8350-based machine I built myself, and for such an old processor, it still performs surprisingly well for its age.
I picked up a broken OEM computer for 50 bucks, it has a pristine A8-7600. It's no upgrade from my i7-4790 OEM computer that I got from my grandpa, but it's still a great piece of kit. Looking forward to putting it into a non-OEM system at some point.
I'm typing this from an A10-7850K which has served me well for the past 5 years, it can even play Crysis at 18-19 frames on low settings, completed the game 3 times, never bsod on me...
in 45 years we've gone from 6000nm to 7nm. cannot imagine how transistors are going to get much smaller. or how technology will change in another 45 years.
Me lembro de ter um K-6 II, rodava tudo, Photoshop, CorelDraw melhor que o Pentium II, nessa época começou a melhorar muito os processadores da AMD, hoje eles se superaram e estão na frente.
I have an old motherboard from that era. It has an Intel i486DX2 66MHZ now and I'm thinking about an upgrade to the Am5x86 as it's the fastest CPU for that socket.
The Fact AMD went silent between 2011 and 2017 shows they needed to re-do some things and hell they came back smashing.
Maily thinking what the fuck to do with the current CEO
@tonson3mgagamer Jincheng zang - expression I love you.
Bulldozer was pretty much a failure from day one. Almost no improvement to ipc despite the process node shrink, a max temp as low as 57 C on some cpus, and heavy power consumption. All it really had going for it was high clock speeds, core count, and pricing. It was significantly behind sandy bridge.
@@aadisahni someone before Lisa Su right? she start at late 2014
@@mixedup5858 Yes. She joined in 2014 when Zen and Ryzen were starting and she was the head of Ryzen department. She than become the CEO right before Ryzen launch
6,000nm to 7nm
We've come a long way
Count the transistor too
Intel= 10 microns to 14nm..... ah no, 9.99 microns
from 4 Mhz to 4 Ghz
the 100 like is mine ;d
Me regalaron una pc del 2006 con una tarjeta de vídeo NVidia GeForce 7200 de 254mb. Es bueno?
Amd: Moving to 5 nm
Intel: Moving to 22nm... 14nm was too much for them.
Lol
14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ dual core
Only $999!
Only in Intel!! Buy now!!!
Amd contracts their manufacturing to tsmc. Intel makes their own chips.
Edit: LOL Intel might also contract to TSMC soon. Laughable.
Intel: moving to 10nm. Sike that didn't work. Moving to 14nm again.
@@UnrealOG137 dude they still design their own chips, not like they’re just the sellers.
1975 - 1995: The clone wars
1996 - Present: The Empire Strikes Back
Core wars episode 1: The Phenom Menace
Core wars episode 2: Attack of the FX
Core wars episode 3: Revenge of the Haswells
Core wars episode 4: A new AMD
Core wars episode 5: Intel Strikes Back
Core wars episode 6: Return of the Athlon
@@commandertaco1762 wait why episode 6 is cakked return of athlon??
@@ShiroCh_ID cuz AMD is making athlon cpus again, they haven't made any since like 2010
* cough * Athlon 3000G
@@commandertaco1762 athlon x4 750k is from 2013, athlon x4 860k is from 2014, athlon x4 960k is from 2015-16
Nice to see AMD kicking the crap out of Intel with new Ryzen line..
Intel has been a dominant monopoly for too long. It's nice to see AMD raising the bar and beating Intel in its own game with the Ryzen.
intel way too expensive........
Exactly, @@TechTators. Intel even had that industrial espionage thing against AMD for decades. Once that ended AMD came out swinging and did not stop fighting.
sadly intel is still better for gaming no amd processor have beaten the i9 9900k yet
@@klr9839 the only problem is:
Games are still made for intel
INTEL : You'll see my 11th Gen "Tiger Lake" processor!
AMD : Yes, the Tiger will drown in the Lake :)
nooice
Me regalaron una pc del 2006 con una tarjeta de vídeo NVidia GeForce 7200 de 254mb. Es bueno?
*drown*
Rocket lake will land in the.. lake
Zen3 beated it
EPYC : Hold my 128 threads 🍻
Franco visit Intel xeon phi 72 cores 268 threads
@@ЕркеКари-и3ь 14nm
@@ЕркеКари-и3ь Cmon come see the 7nm, is that ok? Intel as been searching for 10nm for years and amd beat their ass with 7nm....
3990x: Finally a worthy opponent
@@ЕркеКари-и3ь Would be nice if you know what we are talking about here. CPUs, not co-op cards.
Intel inside - kidney outside
Hahaahahaha
*Intel Inside - Idiot Outside
Lol. I have seen people asking me where is my Intel Inside processor in my Intel Processor Evolution video comments. They don't even know what Intel processor they have. They just see Intel inside and assume it's good.
@@TechTators When I built my computer, there was no other choice for me, than choosing an Intel CPU. Tody I would count on Ryzen.
ua-cam.com/video/uDdgP6tPpA0/v-deo.html
IBM : *Makes Windows Accessible* *and makes AMD get a x86 license*
Intel 2020 : *Hey. That's illegal.*
@tonson3megagamer
song: "expression I love you".
If you don't know yet.
@Saimon_Roblox always repeating
As my professor said: "AMD is always going to be a better product because they focus on the product itself, not in the crappy marketing and advertisement".
But that wasn’t the case for a veeerry long time sooo....
can't say that for before ryzen era. Amd is better for now but fanboyism made intel lose remember that.
I feel like an idiot for buying the i9 - 9900k processor for my first rig. If only I had done proper research a month prior and I would end up with a little more money left on the bank account and a better processor.
Frozen Trip i went with a ryzen 5 1600x three yers ago. Never regretted it. Now I’m upgrading to a ryzen 7 3700X.
BTW, the i9-9900k isn’t that bad of a product.
@@mukunddhar6657 Yeah it's not, but what frustrates me is that I had the money to buy a really good processor. Instead of doing some research about ehich one is better I let brand loyalty get the better of me. Will definitely consider switching to AMD in a couple of years. Probably will have to buy a new motherboard too but what the heck.
intel: nooo you can't just make 4-core cpus obselete!!
amd: ha core printer goes brrr
and then they went and made the 4-core relevant again lmao
BobRossNTV 6 has to be the minimum, ngl
6 core is fine but not everyone plays games.
Amd with threadipper (64 cores) - yes
Ryzen has 4 core CPUs, even the 3300X could be faster than the 3700 in games
You’ve heard of Ryzen 3,5,7, and 9. Now get ready for:
Ryzen 4,6,8, and 10. The new lineup of Ryzen to destroy intel
Ryzen 3 3000's already destroy Intel, no need to develop a new series
you know, just gotta beat the crap outta competition with innovation
@@spangus1469 and im from Intel user before i use MSI ge63 with i7 8750h 1060 and bought new laptop Legion with AMD Ryzen 5 4600h, damn Ryzen 5 4600h is so better than i7 8750h and its more low Temps than Intel, that the main reason i sell my MSI GE63 8 RE its too damn HOT, oh i forgot to mention with Legion i5 (intel) and Legion 5 Amd
AMD legion 5 is less expensive like 100$ and better spec and the other hand Intel Variant legion i5 is i5 gen 10 with 4 cores and i test it on store its performance meh, so i pick Legion AMD. my next Laptop will be AMD CPU better value and specs!
@@spangus1469 let's just uhhh ignore Ryzen 1 and 2
Does Nvidia make processors?
I love how amd was making computers more affordable since the 90s compare to gold digger Intel
Gold digger lol 🤣
I'm done 🤣
its true, intel always overprice their own processors for no reason, which makes intel a gold digger.
meanwhile when amd is always offering competitive perfomance at low prices.
@@Miskko but why is my AMD Radeon E-300 trash?
@@personwhowatchesyoutube5804 these are old cpus, newer ones are actually better
also update your fucking drivers
AMD : For the people.
Intel : for the gay people
@@Raippiapikka nah more like for the stupid people who spend 3x more money for less power lul
@@seth7762 and pay 1000€ for a lake so they can cool it!
@@Raippiapikka AMD for Brainless idiots..
ok in your place intel is cheaper, but in mine its 10x times more expensive, and i saw your other comments saying that intel's cpus were cooler in temps ok ok u rlly want to use the stock cooler of intel, that thing wont cool anything, with my new ryzen build its 30° idle and it can go lower (wraith aspire rgb) note im using the stock cooler
Intel was the Apple of processors, and we didn't even realize that as kids, too expensive, being late to bring some new things like 1Ghz, 7nm, etc.
Wait, when did the bring in 7nm. I thought they were on 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
thttthhttthth
@@aadisahni so funny it’s not like I haven’t seen that a thousand time 👏👏👏
@@KanyeIsKing yeah I know it was a bad joke. I was just itching to say it. It's like AMD will be on 5nm in 2 years(possibly more or less) and Intel delays 7nm again to 2022
@@aadisahni 2022? Jesus that’s almost half way until NASA next mars mission, plus I’m over here with that i9 10900k lol
0:23 So we need to thank IBM for these CPUs.
Alguien me puede explicar por qué dice INTEL en ese procesador?
@@franciscobernal1606 huh?
@@breadinapan8902 He asked if someone could explain him why this cpu has INTEL written in it. (Idk)
@@franciscobernal1606 Porque funcionaban en sockets intel (enserio)
@@rolandozarate9315 gracias
impressive to see that amd always was the one introducing new tecnologies. first 1 ghz processor, first 64 bits processor, first 32, 48 and 64 cores, not to mention that they always tried bringing more cores to the mainstream like they are doing today with the first 6, 8, 12 and 16 cores mainstream processors. while intel was keeping the market at a shit dual to quad core processors. thanks amd!
@Filipe dos Reis I thought Pentium D uses hyperthreading to achieve "dual core"
First monolithic quad-core processor (phenom), the core2quad are two core2duo "glued" in same CPU and linked via FSB.
So basically soviets in space race
Underrated, cheap but innovative
You dont need that much cores for most of the stuff
@@bubhome9901 Now you do with games like Apex using upwards of 8 threads if it has them
I legit paused this like every time it switched to a new CPU so I could read everything lol
"Intel was forced by IBM to license its technology to AMD because IBM wanted at least two CPU suppliers" so, thats the dawn of Intel.
that's*
Although they have grow apart in every aspect, because an Intel I 3,5,7,9 has nothing in common with AMD Ryzen architecture.
@@JorgetePanete Please, just shut the fuck up. Nobody needs grammar nazis in the internet, you're correcting the person over the simplest mistakes. If you wanna be a grammar nazi, at least look for reasonable mistakes dipshit.
@@JorgetePanete you must be fucking fun at parties
haha haters go longparagraph
4.500 transistors: good
40B transistors: massive EPYC
The less transistors you need for the same the better the design, more transistors are not a good thing, but a necessary thing.
No tnt
6000nm vs "7nm"
@@rattlehead999 quite impressive
@@happygimp0No the more transistors the better. Transistors are the main.
2011 - 2017 were dark times indeed, it's good AMD came back and made that magic they always do.
@KMac nothing to do with CPU or GPU! the chipset on motherboard.
GPU you need driver
They never do
@KMac I have had wayyy more trouble with intel igpu drivers than i ever have had with amd, Can't even play a game from 2008 without it crashing.
@Saimon_Roblox
This music is pixel-roblox
@@duncanlandman1428 OK.. But crashing has nothing to do with cpu's rather its the softwares
the Ryzen series was not the competitor of i Series The Ryzen was the killer of Intel Processors
Agreed
Damn, the music did give amd an badass look tbh
It did. It actually felt like fcuk you Intel but I am the boss now..
What music was that??
@@onenutmonster The music is Expression I love you (instrumental)
The music sucks
@@mememanfresh Can you compose your own music?
from 6,000Nm to 7Nm.. thats beautiful
5nm soon
@@rndmbs and 1pn in 20years
@@ruben._.paiaia949 you would hope
but 7Nm is the top
down more thant 7Nm is very hard.
@@kame9 1Nm is the top. Going down from that is eh
Don't pity Intel
Intel been busy Milking the Market dry by any means possible for years
I was one of the victim
"you don't need more than 4 cores",
"Intel wins on Gaming benchmarks",
I'm very ashamed i said that,
no more.
Don't worry now both AMD and Intel are milking the market and in general, the CPU market has been milked since 2008 and for GPUs both AMD and Nvidia have been milking the market since 2011.
@@rattlehead999 for GPU.. nah.. amd still eating the smoke from Nv.. in cpu department amd does have a lil bit upper hand.. i said a lil bit because the Laptop market is still saturated by Intel
@@5at5una AMD has a vastly superior architecture to Nvidia when it comes to GPUs, CPU-wise it's a bit better than Intel.
Also Intel dominates the Laptop market as they have long-lasting contracts with tons of laptop companies and they have a much bigger production volume than AMD. AMD is limited to only a small part of TSMC's production as TSMC has to serve Apple, IBM, along with AMD and a dozen other companies.
@@rattlehead999 even with vast architecture... still cant outperform Nv and still way behind in market.. really wish for better GPU with less issues.. since current GPU still bugged with its Enchanced sync and black screen.. i cant play monster hunter for month on my rx5700 because of the black screen until they patched it out.. really mad about it since there was an event going on... and i miss out a lot when my friend have been farming it
@@5at5una Well keep in mind AMD went greedy last year with the release of the rx 5000 seires and ryzen 3000 series, their profit margins doubled.
The RX 5700XT is a SUB-mid range GPU(251mm^2 die size), that should have costed 300$ MSRP at launch, but AMD went for 46% profit margin and sold it at 400$ MSRP. Still can't compare to the sub-mid range gtx 1080(312mm^2 die size) in 2016 for 700$ at 138% profit margin.
Otherwise, AMD couldn't beat Pascal with GCN(Polaris/Vega) because Global Foundry's 12/14nm was dog shit compared to TSMC's 12/16nm.
1:27 how happy I am to see my first CPU there! The memories!
One thing I loved to see here - that brand consistency since the 80's. Intel fell for the 90's aesthetic (I call in the "FRIENDS" font - with Intel Inside). It's so awesome to see.
THis editing, animation was very smooth and good.
Thanks...
YEah your right.
Sponsored by *AMD*
Why would they sponser me? I am very small UA-camr.
Besides I already have a video about Intel too which I made a long time back
@@TechTators dude im just joking
*AMD* Processors Are More PowerFull Then *INTEL* Intel Is Good But AMD Is Best And The Fun Fact Is
*AMD is offering compititive perfomance at low price*
Agreed...
tell this joke to i9 9900ks in gaming .... ' More PowerFull' even your ryzen 9 3950x is slower than that in games
no, amd is crap, intel is a god to them.
no, intel is crap, amd is a god to them.
@@firkinflamer amd was always crap you stupid prick, if amd was soo good then my friends laptop with a amd a4 quad core would be faster then an i7 m series cpu. amd is a joke... intel is the only way to go...
Always had a huge sentiment to AMD since first athlon series
2:31 thats my Actual processor :(
Mine is at 4:34 (2920x)
Mine at 3:59
mine 3:53
Mine at 4:42.
Mine at 3:29
I still remember upgrading the 486/66 DX2 with 8mb RAM in my first computer to an AMD "5x86 133 MHz" with 64mb RAM when I was 16 years old.
I had both cpus :), dx4 100mhz as well
@@a.v.81 Hey my first cpu amd 486 100mhz i overclocked it to 120mhz ( with jumpers on motherboard ) but it didn't wanted to wakeup on 150mhz lol ... 16 mb ram , 800 mb hdd, cirus logic gpu ( not 3d accelerator just 2d chip ), speakers stereo and 14" monitor 1024x800 43hz lol or 800x600 200hz lol but weeeery dark picture on that color monitor... I miss it now eeeeeh.. If i only had money than i would not sold it but would maxed it out and still have it!!! With turbo high speed button it worked much faster than in low speed mode ( button on mini tower ). My next comp was amd athlon 1600+ if memory serves coz of my father: me - "dad i need i new comp", and my dad - " you have one! you only think to play videogames! What do you want new comp? To play even more videogames?" ...Well... now its God me comp and devil vs the world ( its a joke btw :D )!!! I love computers but that only tryes to fill void which is already there. :D
my first CPU was Z80. so bow to me!
I upgradet the pentium MMX 233 with the AMD K6-II 333-500 it was Awesome 😍👍
And I upgraded from an i5 which was as fast as an i286 to a threadripper 2920x. Now, my computer can finally handle "minecraft".
Something about AMD just makes me proud owner
How they're a bit of an underdog, fighting a war on 2 fronts, fighting Nvidia with their Radeon lineup of GPUs, which are quite competent value/budget GPUs, and Intel with their Zen-based CPU lineup that, while it's not better for solely gaming, very solid value CPUs that do better in everything else compared to Intel processors. You could make the argument that they're beating their competitors, in a way.
I though AMD is so shit...but damn my 65$ A8 7600 was kicking 130$ Intel Core i3 6100 ass the whole time when it comes to gaming
I have an AMD A10-7890k and works perfect.
Thank you AMD for making building a pc affordable😊
Edit: thank god AMD never gave up
AMD EPYC : Hold my 128 threads 🍻
Intel: I can't :(
Don't steal comments
Man, i'm seeing the original comment. This one is copied
Xeon has entered the chat
Adkatka's Channel what is a consumer task
Adkatka's Channel makes sense, that means those cpus could be full of un known mysteries specially because of China
Song : expression I love you
Thank me later.
Thx so much
*Thank you very much :)))))))))))))*
You are a holy man. Thank you :)))
Thanks a lot XD
I was looking for the song name in comment section 😂😂❤😉
Thanks
My Phenom II X4 is still running nice (:
My too
My phenom II X6 is still very nice bro))
@@ghostraccoon7698 mine to
My Athlon II X4 620
@@Montazeran8 My Ryzen 5 1600 still working ok on a Windows 7 x64
Intel: i have advanced processors
AMD: which one passed 20 threads?
Intel: ...
Xeon: first time?
@@geometrikselfelsefesi EPYC/OPTERON: Nahhh i'll be just playing till you reach me! Don't worry though dreams eventually come true!!
Ryzen 9 3950X has 16 core and 32 threads
@@TEO-jo4xm god amd finally catches up with some good cpu's and people lose their shit lol. must of been hard fanboying amd all those years.
@@rickylafleur5823 Hahaah finally you're idiot? Almost all AMD CPUs when got compared with intel prove to be more efficient! I had myself Intel products and also AMD. When Compared AMD always brought me better results! You don't need to be a fanboy to prove that a company was over 30 years better than Intel!
Amd in 2000: S T R O N K
Amd in 2010: I am weak
Amd in 2020: UNLIMITED POWER REEEEE!
amd in 1980: microscope go brrrr
Amd still weak
@@Honeyflower132 no, Intel fanboy
@@cooldownboi3890 no amd cpu is faster than i9 10900k
@@Honeyflower132 have fun with your 4 cores lmao
@@ladripper47874 shut up i have 8 cores
I have had most of their consumer based CPUs since the K6-2, and still have them, AMD has usually had much more competitive prices vs Intel, and much of the time performed as good, or better... except in the FX line, but it wasn't a terrible processor
Yeah.. 2011 to 2017 is best forgotten from AMDs point of view. AMD let Intel gain significant market share from the launch of FX series in 2011 till the Ryzen family is launched.
I have always been a Intel fan. I jumped to AMD's bandwagon just a month ago with the Ryzen 3800x and it is one of the best decision I made.
My first self build computer I used an AMD k5, it was pretty badass for the time. 🤣
@@theunconventionaldeal3879 I had an overclocked k6-2 that was killing my friend's Intel pentium was even hanging with the pentium 4 non hyperthreaded chips, but was getting quite old by then lol.... I still have that chip
A lot of tech/PC channels have re-tested or benchmarked the FX Piledriver and found that it performs much better these days then it did when it was first released, something to do with more programs these days are multithreaded.
@@TechTators I stopped being a fan of Intel back in the 90's when they wouldn't sell the company I worked for CPU's unless it was an exclusive deal, wasn't one AMD processor used for anything.
1:16
That Kryptonite has Ryzen!
Deep! Intel should have seen it coming when they were too busy counting peoples hard earned money....
Ripped the Threads off!
@tonson3mgagamer text music?
(・o・)
This is my first time with an AMD CPU, I used to be Intel but now I'm gonna love this Ryzen 9 5950x way too much!
@enrique amaya wait what?
That's easily one of the best examples of competitivity in the market and how it pushes forward development
@enrique amaya are you sure this is the appropriate place for that?
The song is perfect for this kind of video.
*When you use EPYC, a massive server grade CPU, for gaming.*
Almost as stupid as using an off-road to go shopping 👍
That really doesn't do much
@@parkman29 Or a Ryzen 9, if you don't need that much CPU power.
@@ChloekabanOfficial intel is better
@@SMG4andDanTDMfan6906 Why did you drag Intel into the conversation. We're talking about what AMD processors to use for gaming.
wow from 6000 nm to 7 nm big evolution in last 45 years
Roman Pipkin who knows someday we may laugh at 7nm and 4.2ghz
@@romanpipkin5573 but the core count jump significantly
@@jaquan123ism i think below 7nm isnt possible bc of quantum physics, so we probably need to wait for a new invention before processors become even more powerful on the same space.
@@Whatamood Nope there will be lower soon. Future AMD CPUs will be 5nm with new Zen architectures in a few years or so.
@@アカシア-w7b holy sht
"Evolution of AMD processors (1975-2019)"
More like-
"How Intel got kicked in the ass (2005-2019)"
Woah, woah hold your horses from 2005? Amd never created a cpu that can go at par on any quad core or core 2 duo in terms of performance even some xeon can kick amd turion up to the a-series even if on a very very low price. What the heck are you on? Zen series is the only 1 who save amd to oblivion.
Reality check. AMD started kicking Intel's sometime after the release of the Athlon, so shortly after 1999. With the 2007 release of phenom(1), AMD couldn't complete with Intel's new core. Phenom2 fixed most of the fail, but had to go against core2 (Sandy bridge) and got it's ass kicked as well.
Zen (2017, ryzen1xxx) may have achieved desktop parity, with aurpremacy happening with either zen+ or zen2 depending on how you look at it. But this isn't 1999-2007 and the desktop is now an afterthought (not including laptops as "desktop"). Just now with a second generation of powerful and reliable servers and an amazing "ryzen 4000" laptop chip, Intel is finally once again feeling that old boot from behind.
Except the part from 2011 to 2017... so literally half the time frame you mentioned...
*2000-2005, 2017-present.
@@Zero.Requiem amd always have been better if compared realisticaly not intel cpu slightly faster multiple times more expensive
Ahh brings back such great memories of unlocking my T-bird with a pencil and then carefully trying not to crush it as I strap on a crazy loud FOP38.
Buen video chabón! :D Saludos desde Arg.
Gracias..
Yo tambien soy de Arg!
@@CocoMark ya somos 3 ja
4
This intro is just flawless !
thank you
@tonson3mgagamer expression - I love you
@@UNITED_STATES thankksss
It was amazing to see how AMD have the Ryzen from the death.
I really liked the video, love infographics like these! Good job! The music is on point for something like these.
Thank you..
1990-Amd is just like a parasite to intel than
2020- evolved to dragon to burn intel down
@@matrioz Intel was/is overpriced, they deserve it lol.
@@dragonlord3504 joke 🤣 Amd
In the early to mid 2000 it was quite competitive against the P4 and Intel was doing shady stuff in the late 90's to prevent amd from gaining more terrain.
I watched this video many times because feels soooo smooth
Thank you ❤️
@@TechTators ✌
Informative video👍
Thank you..
0:12 finally my gaming CPU is being reviewed.
💀💀💀
Quick update i got a new laptop that has a i5 11400h
Proud to be a part of an amazing history 🇲🇾
2:10 Sorry to be the one to say it but, there's a typo. Duran & Duron.
So AMD is short version of
Advance
Micro
Device
How fool i am i didn't know this.
how... thats. LITTERLY on every single AMD Box, motherboard for AMD Sockets, etc
@@weberman173 not everyone reads the box that thoroughly
Advanced Micro Devices? more like, Affordable Micro Devices
Advance micro device?
I always thought it was Alien made device.
That K in the K5 really took its effects in recent years too
2:30 my processor XD
Me too
My old pc have that Athlon 64 X2, I used that pc from 2008 to 2017, with an gt9500 1gb the first 4 years, and in 2012 I bought an GTX 650, that goddamn pc always performance so damn well, until my motherboard died on 2017. I build an new pc this year with an Ryzen 5 2600 and GTX 1660 Super, I hope I can upgrade to an RTX card in next year. uwu
:O
I have a ryzen 7 I sound spoiled XD
Me too
Amd now working on 5 nm amd then was 6000 nm wow now this is improvement
This editing is beyond smooth wow
It's nice seeing them being marginalized and then climbing towards being serious competition against the ones they aspired to be in the past.
1:36 - My first processor! K6-II 500Mhz ^^
@ 560Mhz (112Mhz * 5)
first time using AMD on my PC build
after always using intel before
it's already 2 weeks and i started to love this amd
Nice 👍
3:08 my first AMD cpu, pentium 4 was my first desktop cpu
Been an AMD user since mid 90's . They always had the best price\performance ratio. I never built a system with the latest, most expensive components, always the mid choices.
The Animation is smooth af
thanks
It's because, it was made on Ryzen 5 1600 af.
1:59 this is one of most heat processors in the world
i had that processor..
Loved this video, i had to slow it down to .75 so i can read everything.
I'm still using an FX 8 core today and it handles everything perfectly, great piece of engineering
My fx 4 core is still awesome
Still rocking an FX 6100 and it servers great hope to get an FX 8320
Good effort ...nice depiction
Thank you...
Honestly had no idea that AMD had been around for 45 years now; I honestly thought they'd only been around since the Pentium days. Didn't even know they had an 80486 equivalent. I mean, I knew that AMD was one of intel's chief co-producers at one point, but holy crap lol So nice to see my boys in red pullin' ahead in the races nowadays. First modern computer I ever built (thanks to a friend's dad) was an AMD K7 at a whopping 1.05GHz. Prior to that, all the machines my dad and I ever cobbled together from tree belt finds were all intel-based (80386, 80486, Pentium line). But I've been a fan of AMD ever since that little K7 processor. I'm now sitting pretty with an FX-8350-based machine I built myself, and for such an old processor, it still performs surprisingly well for its age.
The DX series has aged very well. I have had FX 6300 and i5 2400 machines. The FX machine gets higher framerates in modern games.
i can still remember i had AMD 486 at 133MHz because Intel did only 100MHz. And that was without overclocking.
Me: I use an AMD Ryzen Core 7 Lmao
AMD: Congrats! wanna watch us beat the hell out of intel?
Me: I guess lmao.
'AMD ryzen core 7'
I love non-tech-savvy people
@@quandaledinglegaming4218 yeah he didnt even specify the other things like it could be a 4700u or a 3700x like thats not specific at all
@@quandaledinglegaming4218 Yeah, I changed from Intel ryzen 7 2600K to an Amd core i5 3600
0:23 like how it says Intel on the CPU😂
this amd procecors licenced by intel, thay time amd just small company
2011-2017's AMD's dark ages 😁 Honestly i like to use and trade that age AMD A series 😎
Согл
@@ДаниилКротов-ж3ч Согл¿
Which song you use in this video pls answer
1 out of 10, Intro is too good
Amd: creates Ryzen
Intel: ight imma head out
Sorry for ask, What music are you using in this video
2:57 it s my proccessor!
2:10 on the left it says duron but on the right it says Duran
From cloning intel to achieving new levels before intel AMD has come a long way...
When you see 140 nm is too large, You've gotten very much ahead in technology
Back when they used the term micrometers
I’m still stuck at pre-ryzen A10 processor
I picked up a broken OEM computer for 50 bucks, it has a pristine A8-7600. It's no upgrade from my i7-4790 OEM computer that I got from my grandpa, but it's still a great piece of kit. Looking forward to putting it into a non-OEM system at some point.
I still have my a10... working like a champ!
I'm typing this from an A10-7850K which has served me well for the past 5 years, it can even play Crysis at 18-19 frames on low settings, completed the game 3 times, never bsod on me...
in 45 years we've gone from 6000nm to 7nm. cannot imagine how transistors are going to get much smaller. or how technology will change in another 45 years.
Me lembro de ter um K-6 II, rodava tudo, Photoshop, CorelDraw melhor que o Pentium II, nessa época começou a melhorar muito os processadores da AMD, hoje eles se superaram e estão na frente.
my AMD FX 8350 is going strong today. :)
What's the BGM？I would like to know!
I know this is a month late, but...
Haytki - Teili Im Glas
WHY IS NOBODY TALKING ABOUT HOW FRICKING SMOOTH THOSE TRANSITIONS WERE WHAT
Because the video is 60 fps and even 4K
1:05 i have this CPU stored in my Drawer, along with my Vintage CPU's collection
nice
I have an old motherboard from that era. It has an Intel i486DX2 66MHZ now and I'm thinking about an upgrade to the Am5x86 as it's the fastest CPU for that socket.
@@Tom2404 nice
You deserve a subscription for this vedio
If AMD can step up their games with their CPUs, they should do the same for the GPU market. Give some love to those guys too 💪
It’s weird to think that most cheap processors match the 2004-2009 ones.
I3 10100f is equal to i7 7700k
Appreciate the editing :)
3:57 My processor 👌🔥
Lmao 1600
@@goldfishtaco8248 Still decent, I have the version with the 12nm process that i got for 85 dollars new
I have ryzen 7 2700😏
My procesor too
Me with ryzen 3 3100
I am still having AMD sempron 145 lol
I still have Intel Pentium Dual Core (I will buy an AMD Ryzen 3, AMD FX 8300, or Intel i3 2100)
@@raphaeloko7478 buy a Ryzen 3, no hesitation
@@raphaeloko7478 go ryzen its beter for upgrade later b450 mb... :)
@@raphaeloko7478 I'd get a Ryzen or wait for Ryzen 5000. I think it's time for a new socket.
@@raphaeloko7478 - my Laptop is still a core 2 Duo ... my PC is at least an AMD FX 8xxx
Thanks to dis person now I can vibe while seeing the presentation :v
I've been looking for a video like this. Great video! Thanks for sharing --> Looking forward to watching your next video
Thank you.