Monday 31st October 2016 saw an Antonov 124 russian cargo plane arrive at Glasgow Prestwick and shortly thereafter a US Air Force heavy lift C-5 Galaxy departed for RAF Mildenhall
Both absolutely amazing but the C-5 sells it for me, that sleek shape for such a large aircraft is so visually appealing and the fact it was built in the mid-late 1960s is astonishing. not to mention the spine chilling sound of the original C-5s with the TF39s will always be iconic.
Russian Federation i completely disagree , antonovs are a lot less streamlined in shape, i find C-5s way more interesting and thats just my opinion you’re gonna have to deal with buddy
Its amazing all the hype and fuss about the Airbus A380 and the Lockheed C5M Galaxy lol The fact is the C-5 has been around since the mid-60s (51 years old) and was the largest airplane in the world for over 20 years. Plus it just so happens that it’s a double-decker too lol To me the C-5 will always be the king of skies !! Comparison Antonov An-225 Mriya Length: 275 ft 7 in (84 m) Wingspan: 290 ft 0 in (88.4 m) Height: 59 ft 5 in (18.1 m) Max Takeoff Weight: 1,410,958 lb (640,000 kg) Number Built: 1 First Flight: December 21, 1988 Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch Length: 238 ft (73 m) Wingspan: 385 ft (117 m) Height: 50 ft (15 m) Max Takeoff Weight: 1,300,000 lb (589,670 kg) Number Built: 1 First Flight: April 13, 2019 Airbus A380 Length: 238 ft 7 in Wingspan: 261 ft 8 in (79.75 m) Height: 79 ft 0 in (24.09 m) Max Take-off Weight: 1,234,600lb (560,000kg) Number Built: 235 as of 30 April 2019 First Flight: April 27, 2005 Boeing 747-800F Length: 250.2 ft (76.3 m) Wingspan: 224 ft 7 in (68.4 m) Height: 63 ft 6 in (19.4 m) Max. Take-off Weight: 975,000 lb (442,000 kg) Number Built: 130 as of December 2018 First Flight: February 8, 2010 Lockheed C5M Galaxy Length: 247 ft 1 in (75.31 m) Wingspan: 222 ft 9 in (67.89 m) Height: 65 ft 1 in (19.84 m) Max Payload: 285,000 (142.5 tons) Max. Take-off Weight: 922,000 lb (418,000 kg) Maximum speed: Mach 0.79 (462 kn, 531 mph, 855 km/h) Cruise speed: Mach 0.77 (450 kn, 518 mph, 833 km/h) Service ceiling: 41,000 ft (11,850 m) at 750,000 lb (340,000 kg) gross weight Number Built: 131 C5A 81 C5B First Flight: June 30, 1968 Antonov An -124 Length: 226 ft 3 in Wingspan: 240 ft 5 in (73.3 m) Height: 68 ft 2 in (20.78 m) Max Take-off Weight 893,000 lb (405,000 kg ) Number Built: 55 First Flight: December 24, 1982 Boeing 747-400 Length: 231 ft 10 in (70.66 m) Wingspan: 211 ft 5 in (64.44 m) Height: 63 ft 8 in (19.41 m) Max. Takeoff Weight: 875,000 lb / 396,890 kg Number Built: 694 First Flight: April 29, 1988 Boeing C-17 Globemaster III Length: 174 ft (53 m) Wingspan: 169.8 ft (51.75 m) Height: 55.1 ft (16.8 m) Max. takeoff weight: 585,000 lb (265,350 kg) Number Built: 279 First Flight: September 15, 1991 Boeing B-52 Stratofortress Length: 159 ft 4 in (48.5 m) Wingspan: 185 ft 0 in (56.4 m) Height: 40 ft 8 in (12.4 m) Max. takeoff weight: 488,000 lb (220,000 kg) Number Built: 744 First Flight: April 15, 1952
The C-5M Super Galaxy is a vast improvement over the earlier models, the CF6 engines are way more powerful and efficient than the earlier TF-39's. The sound of the TF-39's were awesome though.
The CF6 engines produce 22% more thrust. That is extremely significant for lifting. But I agree. The old TF39 engines probably inspired fear in the hearts of many enemies wondering what horrible weapon the plane had inside it to blow them up.
I just bet the Antonov parked next to the Galaxy just so trolls can start a fight about those hard working birds. Those birds have a job, the move cargo, that's called work, so they work to make money, interesting concept..😉
Muy lindo video, de dos realizaciones asombrosas, tanto de Lockheed como de Antonov... Dos máquinas que continúan haciendo historia... Felicitaciones !!!
The CF6 engines have 22% more thrust but do not have the howl that sent the enemy cringing by wondering what horrible weapon was being delivered to blow them up.
They’re both amazing feats of engineering, I don’t care who built them! The AN looks less threatening with the different tail etc., and of course the pretty paint job! It looks like a commercial aircraft vs the mean military look of the C5....doesn’t mean it is any less badass, just looks “friendlier”!😆
This AN-124 is a commercial aircraft. Volga-Dniepr is a commercial air freight airline. They and Antonov Airlines fly the AN-124. The US Air Force has supplemented its C-5 fleet with AN-124 charter Air lifts.
And its still smaller than the Spruice Goose. Yeup the Goose only flew a short distance, but it did fly, and its still the King of all Aircraft. I bet it could really fly, the world will never know..😎
It’s like when the two biggest football players from rival schools turn up at the same party, both know they could do some serious damage, one decides he’s not about to spend a night in jail and decides to leave the party.. Mr C5M just left to go hit up Taco Hell for some after party munchies, meanwhile Mr An-124 is just getting started!
The C-5M is the exact size, they were not elongated. Its just a regular C-5 with newer, more powerful, and more fuel efficient engines. These are not brand new production planes. They're the same 40 to 50 year old planes with the newer engines and improved avionic, that's it.
A bit differences only like the Antonov 124 longer wingspan, using advantagal engine and tail different... C5 Galaxy had shorter wingspan and using TF39 or Cf6 engines....
N4TE - Infinite Flight Videos I agree with you 100%, even at 10,000-12,000 feet (how high the only C5B galaxy I ever saw in my life was) them 39s are amazingly loud from that far of a distance
C9 and AN124 are both great aircrafts built by ingenious engineers. Only aggressive government politics that insights nations against each other makes people try to compare and find a better (superior) things because of animosity that is unsighted by the corrupt politicians. These airplanes are designed and built to lift great weight and transport to very long distances. They both very well do the job they were designed to do - exactly as it was requested by the clients. I have to say - genius of human engineering deserves applaud, no matter where these engineers live or work. Most of the comments I read below are ill informed and misguided. I can only imagine what combined force of the human genius can do if stupid politics would get out of the way!... We would probably have a regular shuttle passenger service to the moon and mars by now, instead we are still concentrated on creating most effective killing machines intended for each other! Until we get over this - we are doomed in this vicious circle of hateful comparisons!
dave boydell Sit and look pretty?! The C-5 has been flying since the 60s! And proven itself in various combat zones! lol you a comedian? Or badly informed?
Phil Montejano you didn’t even read his fucking comment, C-5s are almost never really used, only time ive actually seen a galaxy in person was at a air show!!
No plane planned to replace his two there... no perspective for a Next gen super cargo. Antonov without the Russians cannot embark on a big project. (with the current Ukrainian problems (the Urenian economy is the Poles of Kief, industry is the Russians from the east, its two ethnic groups hate each other) Boeing has no more cash with its repeated proleme on the 787 and the 737 max (plus the global crisis of the Cohen 19 virus, and the slowdown in sales) OKB, for Sukhoi and IIyochine not the skills and hangars to produce such large planes. The Russians don't have any cash. Only Airbus could do it, but he does not have too much experience in large freighters (except beluga) (The 400m is a half failure in addition) However, taking inspiration from the A380 for a Super freighter, with a mobile ramp, could be a perfect replacement for its two birds while offering a payload close to the AN 225. Imagine an A380 with a nose and a quick tail at Cargo This planes would energize the whole sector. It would allow to bow out to C5 and Year 124/225 and a well-deserved retirement. And the worst is that the openings would be much better than for the A380, The freighter explodes and the super freighter even more. Global development needs this type of plane But go and make this understand to the "broom in the ass" who manage Airbus.
@@alexanderpooh4015 Brother was a C-5 pilot and have spent many hours around C-5. I even know where the antenna is and have even seen C5 engines naked.
Tienen que corregir el titulo ese no es un c5 normal ese en un C5M super galaxi, esos no son los motores originales de un c5 normal....el titulo debe ser C5M vs An 124
stanislav savonin C-5 has been in service in the 60s ana only operates in combat zones and military operations. AN 224 was made late 80s with a lesser flying history and only 55 in service. You’re an idiot to compare them both in service and what they do operationally.
No, that Antonov is a civilian model and purely a cargo plane. The C-5 is a military version and designed for the rugged combat zones with more powerful engines and heavier loads than the Russian vodka burner. You’re an idiot.
@@eliesercepeda686 But the Russian vodka burner cool factor is greater. Lol the an-124 was never meant to be compared to the c-5m which is a much more advanced aircraft and considering the fact that the c-5m released way after the an-124 it is of course even unfair to compare the two....
@@eliesercepeda686 You don't know anything do you? The civilian version lacks a few military avionics items but has the same engines, landing gear and structure. The civilian version is just as tough as any military version. Sorry to burst your bubble but you're just ignorant and everybody who knows anything about aircraft knows you are plain wrong and why
Turbotroll NOT the same engines! Even the engines sound different! The sound you hear is from the OLD high compression engines from the 80s and 70s and evening late 90s. Newer engines don’t use high compression and are high pass types (which allows more air around the turbine) to produce more power and are significantly MORE powerful! I do know for I work in the Air Force lol
@mtrujillo1973 The C-5 is longer, but the An-124 has a wider and taller cargo compartment and a longer wingspan. No the C-5 is not larger overall. These measurements are freely available, so it may be you who is on drugs or just stupid
StrongEnough78 What exactly is copied? Wheels on the ground? Cockpit in front of the plane? Cargo bay formed like a big hole? It seems you have some politically caused eye sickness.
StrongEnough78 I never found an american guy joking when he tried to blame russians or chinese to have copied something of US origin. They always consider it an expression of american superoirity - was it justified or not. And, by the way, your kind of sarcasm needs a brand to be identified. Not so convincing, really.
Well considering that the CEO of Antonov basically admitted to coming up with the idea after the C5 was already in production, can be seen in a video on Netflix about the Antonov 225. Search for it and you will find it. He made it clear that they were competing with the U.S. with large aircraft and was surprised that the U.S. didn't try to come up with a bigger plane than the Antonov 225. So with his comment mixed with my sarcasm is how I came up with my post. Also, his comment expressed a lot of superiority as well with the 225 being the largest plane in the world. Frankly we don't need anything bigger and if we did, we would come up with it.
CHRISTIANITY 33 you just insulted ukrainians lol, and your channel is named christianity... Yeah I’m sure you are gonna have to explain God when you get to heaven why you insulted so many people!! You are not Christian and you never were, if you were, you wouldn’t be saying that racist shit
Antonov is Russian .. but Soviet style of economy was ..you know ..Soviets.. Moscow Kremlin says that .. you wouldn't says no Decided to set the plant in Ukraine... and become Ukrainian now.. on this time they never thought that Soviet union could collapses .. for them in Ukraine or in Kazakhstan its was Soviet union ...
They didn't even make 60 124s and only 1 225 They copy the appearance of other manufacturers airplanes but are inferior airplanes. Their economy can't afford anymore
![C-5 Galaxy vs Antonov An-225 [4K/UHD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KdXE4OQebMk/mqdefault.jpg)
![C-5 Galaxy vs Antonov An-225 [4K/UHD]](/img/tr.png)
that's really wonderful thanks to the plane spotters who recorded this moment
Thanks!!
Both absolutely amazing but the C-5 sells it for me, that sleek shape for such a large aircraft is so visually appealing and the fact it was built in the mid-late 1960s is astonishing. not to mention the spine chilling sound of the original C-5s with the TF39s will always be iconic.
Nothing interesting about the C-5 it’s literally the same nose shape as the antonovs
Russian Federation i completely disagree , antonovs are a lot less streamlined in shape, i find C-5s way more interesting and thats just my opinion you’re gonna have to deal with buddy
@@SlavicUnionGaming C-5 is vastly superior to the AN-124. In looks, engines, landing gear and avionics. Deal with it!!
Tom Fabri stop replying
@@83zillafan That's not tf39 that's c-5m
Its amazing all the hype and fuss about the Airbus A380 and the Lockheed C5M Galaxy lol
The fact is the C-5 has been around since the mid-60s (51 years old) and was the largest airplane in the world for over 20 years. Plus it just so happens that it’s a double-decker too lol
To me the C-5 will always be the king of skies !!
Comparison
Antonov An-225 Mriya
Length: 275 ft 7 in (84 m)
Wingspan: 290 ft 0 in (88.4 m)
Height: 59 ft 5 in (18.1 m)
Max Takeoff Weight: 1,410,958 lb (640,000 kg)
Number Built: 1
First Flight: December 21, 1988
Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch
Length: 238 ft (73 m)
Wingspan: 385 ft (117 m)
Height: 50 ft (15 m)
Max Takeoff Weight: 1,300,000 lb (589,670 kg)
Number Built: 1
First Flight: April 13, 2019
Airbus A380
Length: 238 ft 7 in
Wingspan: 261 ft 8 in (79.75 m)
Height: 79 ft 0 in (24.09 m)
Max Take-off Weight: 1,234,600lb (560,000kg)
Number Built: 235 as of 30 April 2019
First Flight: April 27, 2005
Boeing 747-800F
Length: 250.2 ft (76.3 m)
Wingspan: 224 ft 7 in (68.4 m)
Height: 63 ft 6 in (19.4 m)
Max. Take-off Weight: 975,000 lb (442,000 kg)
Number Built: 130 as of December 2018
First Flight: February 8, 2010
Lockheed C5M Galaxy
Length: 247 ft 1 in (75.31 m)
Wingspan: 222 ft 9 in (67.89 m)
Height: 65 ft 1 in (19.84 m)
Max Payload: 285,000 (142.5 tons)
Max. Take-off Weight: 922,000 lb (418,000 kg)
Maximum speed: Mach 0.79 (462 kn, 531 mph, 855 km/h)
Cruise speed: Mach 0.77 (450 kn, 518 mph, 833 km/h)
Service ceiling: 41,000 ft (11,850 m) at 750,000 lb (340,000 kg) gross weight
Number Built: 131 C5A 81 C5B
First Flight: June 30, 1968
Antonov An -124
Length: 226 ft 3 in
Wingspan: 240 ft 5 in (73.3 m)
Height: 68 ft 2 in (20.78 m)
Max Take-off Weight 893,000 lb (405,000 kg )
Number Built: 55
First Flight: December 24, 1982
Boeing 747-400
Length: 231 ft 10 in (70.66 m)
Wingspan: 211 ft 5 in (64.44 m)
Height: 63 ft 8 in (19.41 m)
Max. Takeoff Weight: 875,000 lb / 396,890 kg
Number Built: 694
First Flight: April 29, 1988
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Length: 174 ft (53 m)
Wingspan: 169.8 ft (51.75 m)
Height: 55.1 ft (16.8 m)
Max. takeoff weight: 585,000 lb (265,350 kg)
Number Built: 279
First Flight: September 15, 1991
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Length: 159 ft 4 in (48.5 m)
Wingspan: 185 ft 0 in (56.4 m)
Height: 40 ft 8 in (12.4 m)
Max. takeoff weight: 488,000 lb (220,000 kg)
Number Built: 744
First Flight: April 15, 1952
Obviously I found out only for Galaxy the payload.. weird
Of course the c5 is a legend .
The two aircraft are indeed very impressive! For me, I find Antonov more attractive, a personal taste, but both are magnificent!
The C-5M Super Galaxy is a vast improvement over the earlier models, the CF6 engines are way more powerful and efficient than the earlier TF-39's. The sound of the TF-39's were awesome though.
The CF6 engines produce 22% more thrust. That is extremely significant for lifting. But I agree. The old TF39 engines probably inspired fear in the hearts of many enemies wondering what horrible weapon the plane had inside it to blow them up.
love to see both together. Thanks. Both great planes.
I just bet the Antonov parked next to the Galaxy just so trolls can start a fight about those hard working birds. Those birds have a job, the move cargo, that's called work, so they work to make money, interesting concept..😉
Muy lindo video, de dos realizaciones asombrosas, tanto de Lockheed como de Antonov... Dos máquinas que continúan haciendo historia... Felicitaciones !!!
both amazing
Jim, preciate you finding this image for us real plane experts...
The C5 has been around since 1968-69 lol that should say something in of itself !!!
C 5 us American built and not Commie built
@@philmontejano5971 and?
@@philmontejano5971 Last i checked they both fly.C5 American built,who gives a fuck? What a damn ass.
Phil Montejano you keep calling us communist and we ain’t communist anymore loser!!!
@@philmontejano5971 и что с того?
Without the TF39's, the C5 just isn't a C5!
using C-5M SUPER GALAXY with CF6 engines
The CF6 engines have 22% more thrust but do not have the howl that sent the enemy cringing by wondering what horrible weapon was being delivered to blow them up.
New engines are better but I do miss that low growl of the old TF39s when they throttle up.
I agree!!
rredhawk
Nostalgia WINS Over sense
Unbelievable coexistence!
just amazing to see something that many tons in the air.
6:45 for the comparison
Оба самолёта красивы и величественны
They’re both amazing feats of engineering, I don’t care who built them! The AN looks less threatening with the different tail etc., and of course the pretty paint job! It looks like a commercial aircraft vs the mean military look of the C5....doesn’t mean it is any less badass, just looks “friendlier”!😆
This AN-124 is a commercial aircraft. Volga-Dniepr is a commercial air freight airline. They and Antonov Airlines fly the AN-124. The US Air Force has supplemented its C-5 fleet with AN-124 charter Air lifts.
And even bigger An-225 to compare ))
Galaxy is longer. Antonov has a wider wingspan.
@@free-birdrocker8809 no, An-225 has length of 84 m, Galaxy C-5 has 75 m.
(Probably you meant An-124 as in the video, it has 69 m.)
@@gja822 10-4! old man brain fog....😀
And its still smaller than the Spruice Goose. Yeup the Goose only flew a short distance, but it did fly, and its still the King of all Aircraft. I bet it could really fly, the world will never know..😎
i just compared the specs on wiki and the AN beats the c5B hands down in every respect of range and load carrying
and im a usa person...
Why are you comparing it to the B model? Its outdated. We only use C-5M now
We still have some B models but yeah. If you are going to compare. It should be with the M model.
Pat L we do not use C-5B's anymore. The last C-5B was flown in 2017 and has since been upgraded to a C-5M
@@brockcherry5303 Because the An still beats the M.
@mtrujillo1973 well I mean it does it can carry more weight than the C5 can, but the c-5 has the range
Nice, Camera work 👌
Thanks Emmanuel!
The C5 is sitting there like "Bitch, you ain't shit! You wanna be, you wanna be, you wanna be like me!"
its like hey you you wanna go im better than you!!!! so i see you wanna be like me but im way better than you!!
LOL. That C5 looking at that plane like "you lookin at me?" "I'll kick your butt up and down this runway"
С-5 не нравится присутствие Ан-124.
Monsters meeting
They are two amazing jets.
Progress-D18 Sounds like Lyulka-AL41/AL31
Parabéns!! Seu vídeo ficou muito SHOW, sou fã dos Antonov e tem um cargueiro da Força Aérea nesse , ficou muito Top seu vídeo!!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏👏👏👏
You mean the C-5 and the C-5ski. I miss the sound of the old T39 engines. It just screamed, get the hell out of the way.
It’s like when the two biggest football players from rival schools turn up at the same party, both know they could do some serious damage, one decides he’s not about to spend a night in jail and decides to leave the party.. Mr C5M just left to go hit up Taco Hell for some after party munchies, meanwhile Mr An-124 is just getting started!
I read the C5M is now longer and more powerful with a longer range
The C-5M is the exact size, they were not elongated. Its just a regular C-5 with newer, more powerful, and more fuel efficient engines. These are not brand new production planes. They're the same 40 to 50 year old planes with the newer engines and improved avionic, that's it.
The C5M, CF6 engines produce 22% more thrust than the old TF39 engines that made an amazing howling sound.
С 5 из за хвоста на ил 76 похож
I thought that was IL76
A bit differences only like the Antonov 124 longer wingspan, using advantagal engine and tail different... C5 Galaxy had shorter wingspan and using TF39 or Cf6 engines....
У Руслана хвост высотой с 7 этажный дом.
In terms of sound, a TF-39 beats all
N4TE - Infinite Flight Videos I agree with you 100%, even at 10,000-12,000 feet (how high the only C5B galaxy I ever saw in my life was) them 39s are amazingly loud from that far of a distance
Perfect size for the job. Mid/huge!
C9 and AN124 are both great aircrafts built by ingenious engineers. Only aggressive government politics that insights nations against each other makes people try to compare and find a better (superior) things because of animosity that is unsighted by the corrupt politicians. These airplanes are designed and built to lift great weight and transport to very long distances. They both very well do the job they were designed to do - exactly as it was requested by the clients. I have to say - genius of human engineering deserves applaud, no matter where these engineers live or work. Most of the comments I read below are ill informed and misguided. I can only imagine what combined force of the human genius can do if stupid politics would get out of the way!... We would probably have a regular shuttle passenger service to the moon and mars by now, instead we are still concentrated on creating most effective killing machines intended for each other! Until we get over this - we are doomed in this vicious circle of hateful comparisons!
Could also see another Giant Plane Brother - B747
Holy shit they’re so similar in size
The Russians build things to actually use not just sit and look pretty.
They can't even afford to built more
Only 55 AN 225s were built
dave boydell Sit and look pretty?! The C-5 has been flying since the 60s! And proven itself in various combat zones! lol you a comedian? Or badly informed?
@@philmontejano5971 study more b4 posting a comment man there were 55 an-124's built not an-225's
Phil Montejano you didn’t even read his fucking comment, C-5s are almost never really used, only time ive actually seen a galaxy in person was at a air show!!
AN124 entered the chat
C5 Galaxy has left the chat
No
@@eliesercepeda686 yes
They both look the same.
Naavia how blind are you?
Are you an aviation enthusiast?
You need glasses.
Antonov an 124
No plane planned to replace his two there... no perspective for a Next gen super cargo.
Antonov without the Russians cannot embark on a big project. (with the current Ukrainian problems (the Urenian economy is the Poles of Kief, industry is the Russians from the east, its two ethnic groups hate each other)
Boeing has no more cash with its repeated proleme on the 787 and the 737 max (plus the global crisis of the Cohen 19 virus, and the slowdown in sales)
OKB, for Sukhoi and IIyochine not the skills and hangars to produce such large planes. The Russians don't have any cash.
Only Airbus could do it, but he does not have too much experience in large freighters (except beluga) (The 400m is a half failure in addition)
However, taking inspiration from the A380 for a Super freighter, with a mobile ramp, could be a perfect replacement for its two birds while offering a payload close to the AN 225.
Imagine an A380 with a nose and a quick tail at Cargo
This planes would energize the whole sector.
It would allow to bow out to C5 and Year 124/225 and a well-deserved retirement.
And the worst is that the openings would be much better than for the A380, The freighter explodes and the super freighter even more.
Global development needs this type of plane
But go and make this understand to the "broom in the ass" who manage Airbus.
well we can throw all those plans in the trash now, cant we?
Vergaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....el galaxi c5 ya lo conocia que era lago pero el antonov es como mas masivo...cual es mas grande o carga mas peso?
Thje C-5 can be unloaded and loaded quicker than the An-124 as the C-5 can be loaded and un;oaded from both front and rear and the An-124 can't.
You are not informed enough!
@@alexanderpooh4015 Brother was a C-5 pilot and have spent many hours around C-5. I even know where the antenna is and have even seen C5 engines naked.
@@abelgarcia5432 And what about an-124. Was your brother a pilot of an-124?
@@alexanderpooh4015 C-5
@@abelgarcia5432 and why you so sure that an124 cant be uloaded from both front and back? It can. I work for airlines that use an124
А Руслан то красивее !))
Чем что?
Ruslan is the only one of the two available for commercial charter. IS Air Force has supplemented it's C-5 fleet with AN-124 airlift charters.
Да
Tf39の同じ推力 d-18t
Руслан 124 лучши мире самалёт
Russia AN --- 10 x C5 ---- 0 haha
Tienen que corregir el titulo ese no es un c5 normal ese en un C5M super galaxi, esos no son los motores originales de un c5 normal....el titulo debe ser C5M vs An 124
Cierto. Es un súper galaxy.
Também não é um AN-124 normal. É um AN-124-100.
Parked next to a C5M. Yeah. No contest at all. The AN 224 doesnt hold a match to the C5M. The C5M has broken dozens of World records already.
You mean crash landings ?
stanislav savonin C-5 has been in service in the 60s ana only operates in combat zones and military operations. AN 224 was made late 80s with a lesser flying history and only 55 in service. You’re an idiot to compare them both in service and what they do operationally.
@@eliesercepeda686 who's comparing them idiot?
@@eliesercepeda686 It is not AN 224, but AN 124... At least get right...
There's no aircraft called the an-224 and the c-5 cannot carry as much loads as the antonov. I wonder what records u are talking about.....
21
Great vídeo, next time try to cut some parts, like long no action parts and zooming and camera movings
AN-124🇷🇺❤️👍💪💪💪
Dat love
C 5
Сила пташка
ese.avion.y.el.hermano.mayor.no.son.rusos.son.ucranianos.si.no.lo.sabian.
От оце пташка
Antonov 124 is the real deal.
I'm sure the Antonov is a hell of a lot more rugged than the C5.
No, that Antonov is a civilian model and purely a cargo plane. The C-5 is a military version and designed for the rugged combat zones with more powerful engines and heavier loads than the Russian vodka burner. You’re an idiot.
@@eliesercepeda686 But the Russian vodka burner cool factor is greater. Lol the an-124 was never meant to be compared to the c-5m which is a much more advanced aircraft and considering the fact that the c-5m released way after the an-124 it is of course even unfair to compare the two....
@@eliesercepeda686 You don't know anything do you? The civilian version lacks a few military avionics items but has the same engines, landing gear and structure. The civilian version is just as tough as any military version. Sorry to burst your bubble but you're just ignorant and everybody who knows anything about aircraft knows you are plain wrong and why
Turbotroll NOT the same engines! Even the engines sound different! The sound you hear is from the OLD high compression engines from the 80s and 70s and evening late 90s. Newer engines don’t use high compression and are high pass types (which allows more air around the turbine) to produce more power and are significantly MORE powerful! I do know for I work in the Air Force lol
Turbotroll What’s your job? What background do you have?
Слава героям яки продовжують захищати украинську державу вид окупантив
The C 5 looks like a C 17 parked next to the AN 124. Having said that I like U S aviation tech better
That's because the Soviets copy their inferior airplanes
C 5 is much better
@@philmontejano5971 Russians don't give a fuck about what you think.
Phil Montejano same way we copy their rockets for space ? 😂
@mtrujillo1973 yeah but the an-124 can carry a much greater load.
Been larger in size is useless if all you could carry is less.
@mtrujillo1973 The C-5 is longer, but the An-124 has a wider and taller cargo compartment and a longer wingspan. No the C-5 is not larger overall. These measurements are freely available, so it may be you who is on drugs or just stupid
This is just a copy of the C5 galaxy. What, the Russians can't design a plane for themselves?
You mean just like America copied German rockets.
Like Americans can’t design a space rocket. But supposedly they reach the moon 😂
@@havanascp9602 Are you jealous?Nobody said America can't design a shuttle or go to the moon.
Its not, Is just the Overall Design works well for the type of cargo they're carrying
An-124 always best ! C-5 is white elephant!
C-5M are better why more heavyweight payload
@@iginiobluevest9259 it isn’t it’s longer but the an-124 is physically larger and wider and has a larger cargo hold so can carry more weight and cargo
@@bigchungus6478 look faced for C-5M i like it, look faced for An-124 but maybe
@@iginiobluevest9259 huh that makes no sense
nic vedo 6.11.2019 jordan
Similar size . both amazing . i prefer Little bit ... Mmm C5 galaxy
antonov 124👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
And did Russia ever thank us for letting them copy the C5 to make the AN 124?
StrongEnough78 What exactly is copied? Wheels on the ground? Cockpit in front of the plane? Cargo bay formed like a big hole? It seems you have some politically caused eye sickness.
Yeah it's called sarcasm and a joke. Maybe you've heard of those?
StrongEnough78 I never found an american guy joking when he tried to blame russians or chinese to have copied something of US origin. They always consider it an expression of american superoirity - was it justified or not. And, by the way, your kind of sarcasm needs a brand to be identified. Not so convincing, really.
Well considering that the CEO of Antonov basically admitted to coming up with the idea after the C5 was already in production, can be seen in a video on Netflix about the Antonov 225. Search for it and you will find it. He made it clear that they were competing with the U.S. with large aircraft and was surprised that the U.S. didn't try to come up with a bigger plane than the Antonov 225. So with his comment mixed with my sarcasm is how I came up with my post. Also, his comment expressed a lot of superiority as well with the 225 being the largest plane in the world. Frankly we don't need anything bigger and if we did, we would come up with it.
So it is no longer on Netflix but it is on here. National Geographic Megastructures Antonov 225.
viva rusia saludes desde mexico
Build the wall!
The Russians called mexicanos - "dirty fucking black jackals" Nothing personal.
'
C 5 very powerful 🐘🐘🐘
Shut up.Stop showing your ignorance.
Antonov is king! You compare horse(Antonov) with a donkey!!!
@@oneproblemcanttrustanyone.9489
You understand that budget of army is you tax?
Proud for what?
Proud : Vietnam, Iran, Syria, Korea, Afghanistan?
@@oneproblemcanttrustanyone.9489 must be some stupid jelous idiot.
@@oneproblemcanttrustanyone.9489 Well considering antonov is based in Ukraine that means Ukrain builds shit right?
CHRISTIANITY 33 you just insulted ukrainians lol, and your channel is named christianity... Yeah I’m sure you are gonna have to explain God when you get to heaven why you insulted so many people!! You are not Christian and you never were, if you were, you wouldn’t be saying that racist shit
C-5 is best
Rusia el mejor país del mundo y al mas extenso solo por deseo me casare con una rusa cuando cresca
Hello to Ukrain designers /AN 124 /
Antonov is Russian .. but Soviet style of economy was ..you know ..Soviets..
Moscow Kremlin says that .. you wouldn't says no
Decided to set the plant in Ukraine... and become Ukrainian now.. on this time they never thought that Soviet union could collapses .. for them in Ukraine or in Kazakhstan its was Soviet union ...
Soviet not Ukraine be more precise it's Russian
🇺🇸USA vs 🇷🇺Russia
Russian wins an 124
The Antonov an 124 was made by the Ukrainians 🇺🇦
really?
The 747-8F out lifts both the C-5M and AN-124.
AN 124 BEATIFUL plane C5 galaxy UGLY plane ! haha
They didn't even make 60 124s and only 1 225
They copy the appearance of other manufacturers airplanes but are inferior airplanes.
Their economy can't afford anymore
The Russians build them big, BUT, not better. C5 rules!
Built by Ukrainians, not built-in Russia
an124
СССР строил самолеты для дела.
USA - только что поиметь и этого денег.
Слава героям яки продовжують захищати украинську державу вид окупантив
Слава героям яки продовжують захищати украинську державу вид окупантив