They said that about Afghanistan, Iraq, and so many other places. When was the last time the US won a war? Machines do not win wars. Determined people do.
That carrier-type landing at the 6:05 mark shows the difference between Navy carrier aircraft and USAF aircraft landings i.e. - high sink rate (controlled crash) vs silky smooth sink rates.
Actually there's no reason for Navy Ac to "Carrier" land an Ac on land as hard as they do. That's just poor training. Yes the Ac is designed to hard hit but again, not necessary.
@@Mr51Caveman I'm not sure where that video was shot, but Navy pilots do a lot of those landings when getting ready to deploy. They have weeks of Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLPs) prior to doing it at the carrier. Once the daytime FCLP minimums are complete, then they do them at night. They have to get a minimum # of landings and are mandatory prior to landing on the ship. This landing could be an FCLP counting towards the minimum.
They know how to land light. But when you see them landing and taking off again… they are training for what would be Aircraft landings. There are lines painted on the runway to represent the arresting cables on the carrier and are monitored to see how well they are completing the task And in all honesty they don’t really do high angle landings anymore, unless it is at a time when things are very rushed with one plane landing right after another. Now it is much closer to a near level approach and then hit down at angle from a few feet above horizontal with the AC. The harder touchdown is when right above the arresting cables as it is a small area
@@jamesh.2271 Unless things changed drastically since I was in the Navy, landing aboard aircraft carriers, they still must do carrier landings the same way. With the ACLS (Automatic Carrier Landing System) the computers can land the plane and catch a #3 wire every time, or a #2 wire on the latest carriers. The angle is set for a constant glideslope. They never varied during my time. The FCLPs (Field Carrier Landing Practices) are done with the lines painted and a Navy pilot can land softly when landing on a normal runway, not a floating one. But it's the same landing angle at the practice field as it is at the carrier if doing FCLPs.
The moment you believe you are superior and cannot be beat, your ass gets kicked. NEVER assume the qualifications or capability of the opponent in any contest.
@@lucouellet6315 It's not frustration by digysdosdiy9113. It's common sense. When you think you're top of the heap, standby cause someone else is looking to knock you off of that hill. The current use of drones in Ukraine is a wakeup call to the U.S. military. We are pursuing drone warfare aided by AI. But so are others. It's always a punch-counterpunch and you cannot rest on your past laurels. And don't forget Russia's strategy is to have MUCH MORE of whatever they have than we do. The saying goes, QUANTITY has a QUALITY all its own. We have the best quality there is, but you can run out of bullets taking down the huge quantity someone else throws at you.
Truely an excellent presentation! My father was a Lt.General aviator in the Marine Corps from 1939 to 1972 and flew the Phantom , all helo's , jets and props in the Corps. He would be impressed by your presentation and the new technology. He served as CG in Vietnam, Korea (Prisoner of War) and WWII, and Special Ops. in Cambodia! Hope we will not give up to the pilotless aircraft in the future!!!! My brother was a Phantom Pilot in the Marine Corps and I was a Battalion Commander of the 1stBn, 10th Marines. (1967-1990). Semper Fi.
For whatever reason, when you sign on the dotted line then place yourself on the yellow bootprints, understand the challenge put in motion upon success is rewarded by a Godlike ability to complete ANY task! MARINES!
In just a little over 100 years air planes have gone from a cloth fabric skin and a top speed of 100 mph to a radar absorbing skin that can go 1550 mph. CRAZY!
nonsense--anything that flys,floats,rolls is nothing more than target----russia,china have invested almost totally in missile,rocket tech-----they have the most advanced jamming and jam proof missiles out there===in the next full on war everything usa,nato has will self destruct in the first hour--anything usa has will stop functioning--usa,all of europe will be ash
The F-22 Raptor is around $134million dollars per copy... The F-35 Lightning was never to fly for the US Army!!! The F-35 was purchased by THE USAF, Marines and the US Navy...
Its despairing to know that human genius has limitations, while human stupidity (you ) has none. cam you be more specific ) does the truth hurt, the rest of the world will all be laughing when your nation colipases with all its economic Ponzi schemes, (national debt, credit card debt, property market etc. etc) The 2000s United States housing bubble has a real-estate bubble affecting over 1/2 of the U.S. states. It was the impetus for the subprime mortgage crisis. you have a 3rd world infrastructure, (roads bridges, sewers system railways, powerlines, etc. etc.) your police force can't control the crime in most (all.) of you main cities. you have more clowns in jail, more drug addicts, mass killing on a daily basis, A president that's as corrupt as the rest of you YANKs including, your senators. A medical system that most in America says does not work, A education system that’s too expensive for most YANKs. Millions living on the streets because they can’t afford the rent. No real pension backup for the elderly like most developed nations. You squander billions on defence equipment, have 800 bases oversea bases, & basically can't win a war, except maybe the gulf war, please don't count those power nations like Grande & Panama Canal Most YANKS COULD NOT FIND IT ON A MAP/ Oscar Wilde summed it up saying, "America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without (going thru' the process of) civilization.")
Pity you lost most wars. Since 1945, the USA has very rarely achieved meaningful victory. The United States has fought 5 major wars Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan only the Gulf War in 1991 can really be classified as a clear success. Then again its not the equipment its the MAN.
Russia lost to Afghanistan in the 1980's, got it's butt handed to it by little Finland in the Second World War and is currently losing in Ukraine. Without the American lend lease aid and the United States, England and Canada supplying the Soviet Union through the Arctic during the Second World War, the Russian's would have lost that war, and China lost to Vietnam. So what, precisely is your point?
@@donaldwilliammacdougall9866 - "MAN", wasn't that word forbidden in the woke rainbowed US of A military? It's the its, or one of the other 72 (?) LGBTXYZ pronomen.
Try read some history (I know that’s pretty hard for a YANK.) but ¾ of the Germany army, was defending the Eastern front, If not for that, their would never had been a D-day landing. you YANKs are the only ones to run humiliated publicly not once but twice (Vietnam / Afghanistan.) 60 years of losses, 1 win (Gulf war.) ‘O’ will we count Granada & the Panama Canal. a bet most YANKs could not find them on a map, the Canal part might help some.
Even though we cannot count on a retarded government we can count on the incredible men and women of the most dominant military ever to protect the 🇺🇸 from those who would wish harm on the U.S. Thank you so very much those of you that serve, we support you and your efforts! 💪🇺🇸🤘
Then yankee if you are so good WHY do you have to pay UKRANIANS to fight your battles against Russia ? Only COWARDS use PROXIES !!!! USA uses UKRAINE as it's Proxy. There are 7 Billion NON-westerners of the world who Despise your ignorance and hubbris.
Yes, after so many decades of the United States attacking, invading and occuppying scores of countries, stealing their natural resources, installing corrupt puppet political regimes and murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian victims, men, women and children, your pseudopatriotic statements STINK💩.
@@tawanda7257 The USA has never harmed anyone, the retarded gov has harmed everything from the single cell organism to its own people but we the people=USA🇺🇸 has never harmed anything that didn't have it coming but we usually get over it, shake on it, then party🍻 like it's 1999! You can be a hater but we just good folks having a good time being very free!👏🎉😎
The German war machine of the 30’s and 40’s were the most technologically advanced for its time and nothing could beat them . But then came cheap to produce in high numbers machines that German technology couldn’t compete with.
A foot pound is a unit of energy, not to be confused with the pound foot, which is a measure of torque. The foot pound is a measure of a pound of force applied over one foot.
@@teddeebayre3433 Most people (often even engineering students and sometimes book authors) do not seem to know the difference. Many torque specifications are given in ft-lbf, not lbf-ft. This harkens back to the fact that torque is the cross product of the position vector first with the force vector second, thus many prefer ft-lbf for torque and lbf-ft for energy. And since work is force X distance (or better yet, the integral of force over distance) and has dimension of energy, lbf-ft could be argued as proper units of energy rather than ft-lbf. Of course in the metric system Newton-Meters are used for the dimension of torque while Joules replace the same unit, but represent the dimension of energy, work, etc.
@@magick1969 ...And engineers in the real world (in the USA) use both English and SI. I want my engineering students to be "bi-lingual". Btw, I was an engineering student between 1995 and 2002 at Purdue University (BS che, MS me) and we learned to use both systems.
Would be cool if you 1) gave credits for the video clips you use, especially when using clips from UA-cam creators and 2) show footage of the aircraft you're talking about. 7:26 that's an F-117, not a B-2. 4:48 that's a MiG-29, not an F-15. 5:43 those are super hornets, not hornets. 6:53 neither of those are F/A-18s either. 7:12 is not an F/A-18, that's an F-15E.
No body is worried there had always been good fighters in USAF yet they lost of lot of battles against ill armed enemies such as Korea, Viet nab, Afghanistan, Could do nothing even in Iraq the the Americans had difficulties holding their place. So no body is afraid of an army that cannot cash its superiority in battle and if a battle in won the War is another matter.
Just like their Bradleys, NLAWS, Abrams, Leopards, Fighter Jets, and Bombers, so will all those fancy jets and bombers be destroyed humiliatingly. Study histories of the proxies between Russia/USSR and the USA and you'll notice the Russians/USSR always has the upper hand; Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam, Sudan, WW1, WW2, etc. The USA has the media and gets to make and show all the hype, but when war tests their weapons against Russia's, they perform below par.
--anything that flys,floats,rolls is nothing more than target----russia,china have invested almost totally in missile,rocket tech-----they have the most advanced jamming and jam proof missiles out there===in the next full on war everything usa,nato has will self destruct in the first hour--anything usa has will stop functioning--usa,all of europe will be ash
Stalin already realized that Russia would not be able to defeat the US in the air. That is why Russia has the world's best anti aircraft systems. As for aircraft carriers, they can be sunk by hypersonic missiles and the US has no way of shooting them down. What use are the planes if the carrier is sunk?
Let's test that theory, ruuski-troll. Let's see if the Gerald Ford can be sunk. Let's see if the hypersonic missles can be intercepted. The USA certainly has a plan, and wouldn't be itching to shitstomp Russia, then China if they were afraid of hypersonic missles and nukes.
If you saw it spoke of we already got multiple units ready to fight. The ones not spoken of it what these other nations are worried about. We got them to.
The most advanced don't mean the most effective. . Right now some old Russian arms are taking down the most advanced NATO arms in Ukraine every single day.
Great video. The "Son Of BlackBird" that is shown at the start - that looks like how the SR-7* planes might look like today is an interesting concept. You could draw a Triangle around the SR-71's - it would have to be on the larger side but it's possible.
I'm sorry but any introduction that starts "Without a doubt, the United States has always had the most advanced military technology." shows a serious lack of historical perspective and calls into question any conclusion of the author. As just a few examples: the Mark 14 torpedo of WWII, the Sherman tank in Korea, the M-14 rifle in Vietnan and the current Littoral Combat Ships.
Well, when discussing modern day technology, without even a shadow of doubt, the U.S. dominates in an extreme way so I'll go ahead and forgive the indiscretion. Lol
No doubt that the US can develop mighty weapons however, you don't know what your adversaries exactly have developed. You can be proud,but remember, underestimate the other party is the start of a defeat.
@@EricSoulliage If they perform like traditional Chinese "junk", we got nothing to worry about. Ever hear of "Quality fade"? China invented and implemented it.
@@SouthernStorm_61 - Ask Americans about the Sears brand tools after they got taken over by B&D. The factory is closing and Craftsman quality tools were history after B&D got their dirty hands on it.
The radar lock has to occur on an RDS the size of a bumblebee. Maybe Putin likes your analysis but it is not true. Low frequency radar has a very wide field of view.... too late. RIP
I hear they breakdown slot because they're electronics are made from scrap. This is why they have to keep making new ones. Lockheed Martin was Scottish firm until about 10 years ago, but Scotland got rid of them for a republic.
Thanks!
An old saying, but very true. Never say never.
Never say never… the ball ⚽️ is round for all players
Look at what Vietnam did. A bully can always get knocked out by a skinny guy if hit with conviction
Never...say never, as regards to war.
They said that about Afghanistan, Iraq, and so many other places. When was the last time the US won a war? Machines do not win wars. Determined people do.
That carrier-type landing at the 6:05 mark shows the difference between Navy carrier aircraft and USAF aircraft landings i.e. - high sink rate (controlled crash) vs silky smooth sink rates.
Actually there's no reason for Navy Ac to "Carrier" land an Ac on land as hard as they do. That's just poor training. Yes the Ac is designed to hard hit but again, not necessary.
@@Mr51Caveman I'm not sure where that video was shot, but Navy pilots do a lot of those landings when getting ready to deploy. They have weeks of Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLPs) prior to doing it at the carrier. Once the daytime FCLP minimums are complete, then they do them at night. They have to get a minimum # of landings and are mandatory prior to landing on the ship. This landing could be an FCLP counting towards the minimum.
They know how to land light. But when you see them landing and taking off again… they are training for what would be Aircraft landings.
There are lines painted on the runway to represent the arresting cables on the carrier and are monitored to see how well they are completing the task
And in all honesty they don’t really do high angle landings anymore, unless it is at a time when things are very rushed with one plane landing right after another.
Now it is much closer to a near level approach and then hit down at angle from a few feet above horizontal with the AC.
The harder touchdown is when right above the arresting cables as it is a small area
@@jamesh.2271 Unless things changed drastically since I was in the Navy, landing aboard aircraft carriers, they still must do carrier landings the same way. With the ACLS (Automatic Carrier Landing System) the computers can land the plane and catch a #3 wire every time, or a #2 wire on the latest carriers. The angle is set for a constant glideslope. They never varied during my time. The FCLPs (Field Carrier Landing Practices) are done with the lines painted and a Navy pilot can land softly when landing on a normal runway, not a floating one. But it's the same landing angle at the practice field as it is at the carrier if doing FCLPs.
And how many carrier landing have you performed to be an expert in this field?
The moment you believe you are superior and cannot be beat, your ass gets kicked. NEVER assume the qualifications or capability of the opponent in any contest.
😂😂😂 u r frustrated ?!
@lucouellet6315 No, not frustrated, but honest. We've had our ass kicked for this before and know what we're talking about.
No one in the United States military underestimates or overestimates any potential enemy.
just cause some people randomly do there own videos like this doesn't automatically make it an official statement or mindset of our great country
@@lucouellet6315 It's not frustration by digysdosdiy9113. It's common sense. When you think you're top of the heap, standby cause someone else is looking to knock you off of that hill. The current use of drones in Ukraine is a wakeup call to the U.S. military. We are pursuing drone warfare aided by AI. But so are others. It's always a punch-counterpunch and you cannot rest on your past laurels. And don't forget Russia's strategy is to have MUCH MORE of whatever they have than we do. The saying goes, QUANTITY has a QUALITY all its own. We have the best quality there is, but you can run out of bullets taking down the huge quantity someone else throws at you.
Truely an excellent presentation! My father was a Lt.General aviator in the Marine Corps from 1939 to 1972 and flew the Phantom , all helo's , jets and props in the Corps. He would be impressed by your presentation and the new technology. He served as CG in Vietnam, Korea (Prisoner of War) and WWII, and Special Ops. in Cambodia! Hope we will not give up to the pilotless aircraft in the future!!!! My brother was a Phantom Pilot in the Marine Corps and I was a Battalion Commander of the 1stBn, 10th Marines. (1967-1990). Semper Fi.
What are you trying to say.
you r family managed to fight in many losing wars,
Personally I would keep that quite.
I put my comments above.hat would
Were you drunk when you typed this, Boris?
This type of comment I'd expect from a 5 year old. (or YANK,)
Try back-up your comments.
Semper Fi
For whatever reason, when you sign on the dotted line then place yourself on the yellow bootprints, understand the challenge put in motion upon success is rewarded by a Godlike ability to complete ANY task! MARINES!
THANKS TO OUR AIR FORCE!... YOU ARE AWSOME!
I feel Better Already!
Having more than one contingency plan I know the US has, I'm more worried about the people supposedly in charge.
In just a little over 100 years air planes have gone from a cloth fabric skin and a top speed of 100 mph to a radar absorbing skin that can go 1550 mph. CRAZY!
Even faster than that , the Black Bird was going over 2000 mph in the 60s, it could out run most missiles…
well said... "Never say never... Those raptors are some badash machines though
Why do you not feature the most lethal Air superiority fighter of them all, the stealthy F19 ??
Because he’s flexing that we don’t need our most dangerous when we have so many GOOD OPTIONS haha
The ultimate modern combat aircraft.
nonsense--anything that flys,floats,rolls is nothing more than target----russia,china have invested almost totally in missile,rocket tech-----they have the most advanced jamming and jam proof missiles out there===in the next full on war everything usa,nato has will self destruct in the first hour--anything usa has will stop functioning--usa,all of europe will be ash
Great channel ❤
Confidence is one thing, arrogance is another . . . Never say never!
Have u ever met an American Soldier? All arrogance.
@@archenemy439 Yes. I have family members who have served in the United States military and none of them are arrogant.
Pride may kill .but airagince gets anvie, don't be haters or leave.
1976 Rocks n jc 2
I too have family in the military and are not arrogant.
Well said friend
All great empires though they’re invincible!
The U.S. can beat anyone in a computer war game. In reality, they always get their "bums" kicked!!! Case in point, U.S. and NATO against Russia!!!
The F-22 Raptor is around $134million dollars per copy... The F-35 Lightning was never to fly for the US Army!!! The F-35 was purchased by THE USAF, Marines and the US Navy...
F-22 Raptor is around $134million dollars per copy...
That is why they refused to let Tom Cruise, a competent pilot, fly one.
@@WorldPeace-1 Ha Ha Ha Tom would have bought his own if they would have sold him one.
Im proud to be an American 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Damn proud!👍🏽
Its despairing to know that human genius has limitations,
while human stupidity (you ) has none.
cam you be more specific )
does the truth hurt,
the rest of the world will all be laughing when your nation colipases
with all its economic Ponzi schemes, (national debt, credit card debt, property market etc. etc)
The 2000s United States housing bubble has a real-estate bubble affecting over 1/2 of the U.S. states.
It was the impetus for the subprime mortgage crisis. you have a 3rd world infrastructure,
(roads bridges, sewers system railways, powerlines, etc. etc.)
your police force can't control the crime in most (all.) of you main cities.
you have more clowns in jail, more drug addicts, mass killing on a daily basis,
A president that's as corrupt as the rest of you YANKs including, your senators.
A medical system that most in America says does not work,
A education system that’s too expensive for most YANKs.
Millions living on the streets because they can’t afford the rent.
No real pension backup for the elderly like most developed nations.
You squander billions on defence equipment, have 800 bases oversea bases,
& basically can't win a war, except maybe the gulf war,
please don't count those power nations like Grande & Panama Canal
Most YANKS COULD NOT FIND IT ON A MAP/
Oscar Wilde summed it up saying,
"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without (going thru' the process of) civilization.")
God Bless USA ..... Trust In God.🙏❤️👍
The people and the machines are incredible.
Keep up the good work. Stay safe
NEVER SAY NEVER!
Not just best quality, but better pilots, better tactician and will power to fight are important as well.
Pity you lost most wars.
Since 1945, the USA has very rarely achieved meaningful victory.
The United States has fought 5 major wars Korea, Vietnam,
the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan only the Gulf War in 1991
can really be classified as a clear success.
Then again its not the equipment its the MAN.
Russia lost to Afghanistan in the 1980's, got it's butt handed to it by little Finland in the Second World War and is currently losing in Ukraine. Without the American lend lease aid and the United States, England and Canada supplying the Soviet Union through the Arctic during the Second World War, the Russian's would have lost that war, and China lost to Vietnam. So what, precisely is your point?
@@donaldwilliammacdougall9866 - "MAN", wasn't that word forbidden in the woke rainbowed US of A military? It's the its, or one of the other 72 (?) LGBTXYZ pronomen.
Try read some history (I know that’s pretty hard for a YANK.)
but ¾ of the Germany army, was defending the Eastern front,
If not for that, their would never had been a D-day landing.
you YANKs are the only ones to run humiliated publicly
not once but twice (Vietnam / Afghanistan.) 60 years of losses,
1 win (Gulf war.) ‘O’ will we count Granada & the Panama Canal.
a bet most YANKs could not find them on a map,
the Canal part might help some.
@@donaldwilliammacdougall9866 The one engagement I was part of, first Gulf War...we pitched a F'ing shutout!
Um
Which war have we won since the revolution
Spanish American and the war of 1812
our debt will be our failing, and our leaders don't see it.
That's an F-15 Eagle @6:29, not a Hornet. @7:12 and @7:15 are also F-15 Eagles.
I know the power I feel wotting a 5.7 Hemi -
However pushing an engine to "Mach 2"
Is on a whole nother level 🛩
That aircraft at the 6:28 and 7:11 marks is the F-15 Eagle, not the F/A-18 being discussed at those times.
Even though we cannot count on a retarded government we can count on the incredible men and women of the most dominant military ever to protect the 🇺🇸 from those who would wish harm on the U.S. Thank you so very much those of you that serve, we support you and your efforts! 💪🇺🇸🤘
Isn't it Americans harming other nations
Then yankee if you are so good WHY do you have to pay UKRANIANS to fight your battles against Russia ?
Only COWARDS use PROXIES !!!!
USA uses UKRAINE as it's Proxy.
There are 7 Billion NON-westerners of the world who Despise your ignorance and hubbris.
@@tawanda7257They don't count. USA USA USA
Yes, after so many decades of the United States attacking, invading and occuppying scores of countries, stealing their natural resources, installing corrupt puppet political regimes and murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian victims, men, women and children, your pseudopatriotic statements STINK💩.
@@tawanda7257 The USA has never harmed anyone, the retarded gov has harmed everything from the single cell organism to its own people but we the people=USA🇺🇸 has never harmed anything that didn't have it coming but we usually get over it, shake on it, then party🍻 like it's 1999! You can be a hater but we just good folks having a good time being very free!👏🎉😎
The German war machine of the 30’s and 40’s were the most technologically advanced for its time and nothing could beat them . But then came cheap to produce in high numbers machines that German technology couldn’t compete with.
Pound force (lbf) of thrust, not pound-feet (ft-lbf) which is torque (or energy, depending on the context)
A foot pound is a unit of energy, not to be confused with the pound foot, which is a measure of torque. The foot pound is a measure of a pound of force applied over one foot.
@@teddeebayre3433 Most people (often even
engineering students and sometimes book authors) do not seem to know the difference. Many torque specifications are given in ft-lbf, not lbf-ft. This harkens back to the fact that torque is the cross product of the position vector first with the force vector second, thus many prefer ft-lbf for torque and lbf-ft for energy. And since work is force X distance (or better yet, the integral of force over distance) and has dimension of energy, lbf-ft could be argued as proper units of energy rather than ft-lbf. Of course in the metric system Newton-Meters are used for the dimension of torque while Joules replace the same unit, but represent the dimension of energy, work, etc.
@@damonsisk4270 Engineering students deal with SI standards since the late 80s.
@@magick1969 ...And engineers in the real world (in the USA) use both English and SI. I want my engineering students to be "bi-lingual". Btw, I was an engineering student between 1995 and 2002 at Purdue University (BS che, MS me) and we learned to use both systems.
B2 spirit is the most beautiful of them all.
God bless our service members 🙏🏻
Yeah, they lost every war after WWII.
LOve you work❤❤❤❤😂, Paul Martin Decattur Ga.
This why I like being American
YES!!!!!!!!!GO USA111111111111111111111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Should have made a Navy aircraft video, as the F-18 doesn't belong in a video about the Air Force fighters and bombers
Would be cool if you 1) gave credits for the video clips you use, especially when using clips from UA-cam creators and 2) show footage of the aircraft you're talking about. 7:26 that's an F-117, not a B-2. 4:48 that's a MiG-29, not an F-15. 5:43 those are super hornets, not hornets. 6:53 neither of those are F/A-18s either. 7:12 is not an F/A-18, that's an F-15E.
Ahem......You forgot about the SR72 Darkstar.
American Fighter Pilots and their planes are number one in the World!
Ok let's try with Russia and China then world will decide who is the best 😊
never be over confident, what we in the US should be is grateful to God! for what we have! and not show off!!!!!!!!
That aircraft at the 6:15 mark is the A-6 Intruder, not the F/A-18 being discussed at that time.
Are you kidding me? Are you that arrogant that you think only the US possess aircraft of this calibre?
We develop it and politicians sell it to our enemies.
No body is worried there had always been good fighters in USAF yet they lost of lot of battles against ill armed enemies such as Korea, Viet nab, Afghanistan, Could do nothing even in Iraq the the Americans had difficulties holding their place. So no body is afraid of an army that cannot cash its superiority in battle and if a battle in won the War is another matter.
Just think, we've had F-22s since 2005. That makes it almost 20 years old already, and we are just starting to see them in the theater for use!
Just like their Bradleys, NLAWS, Abrams, Leopards, Fighter Jets, and Bombers, so will all those fancy jets and bombers be destroyed humiliatingly.
Study histories of the proxies between Russia/USSR and the USA and you'll notice the Russians/USSR always has the upper hand; Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam, Sudan, WW1, WW2, etc.
The USA has the media and gets to make and show all the hype, but when war tests their weapons against Russia's, they perform below par.
--anything that flys,floats,rolls is nothing more than target----russia,china have invested almost totally in missile,rocket tech-----they have the most advanced jamming and jam proof missiles out there===in the next full on war everything usa,nato has will self destruct in the first hour--anything usa has will stop functioning--usa,all of europe will be ash
Tks.
Stalin already realized that Russia would not be able to defeat the US in the air. That is why Russia has the world's best anti aircraft systems. As for aircraft carriers, they can be sunk by hypersonic missiles and the US has no way of shooting them down. What use are the planes if the carrier is sunk?
You mean the Kinzhal ? Please, spare me the bullshit.
Let's test that theory, ruuski-troll. Let's see if the Gerald Ford can be sunk. Let's see if the hypersonic missles can be intercepted. The USA certainly has a plan, and wouldn't be itching to shitstomp Russia, then China if they were afraid of hypersonic missles and nukes.
Your delusional keep thinking they got the best anti aircraft system
Wait a year, Russia. You are in for some horrible times.
@@gregchristopher1961 what will be happening a year from now ?
We the willing, led by the unknowing are constantly doing the impossible for the ungrateful.
Well put.....
Welcome to America.
In the US Army it's "The unwilling led by the incompetent to do the impossible for the ungrateful".
At the 3:45 mark the ARMY has ZERO F-35s. The F-35A belongs to the U.S. Air Force.
Chalk it up to just another one of "THEM" videos.
If you saw it spoke of we already got multiple units ready to fight. The ones not spoken of it what these other nations are worried about. We got them to.
SELF Praise is NO Praise. One never worries about Boasters but Only the quiet ones.
they don't have to defeat the airforce, just their ability to deliver that airforce where needed.
God Bless America❤❤❤
Where is the A-10 WARTHOG
The f22 raptor is wanting to be fed some meat 😂😂😂😂
Rattling of her tail, showing the fangs of rage😅❤😊🎉
I think it unwise that videos are posted detailing the specs
for show and boosting how powerful is usefull to engage is another.matter that the difference
Scramble the Software and there's no Airforce.
We are over 30 trillion in debt and climbing. Glad we have something that is great!
No mention of the TR3B or Aroara.
Until you find out we arm both sides.
Design a space craft more into an Alien technology space craft better technology faster quiet.. this awesome..
and these fighters are only the ones we know about.....
Does anyone know how many engineers are building these aircraft's??
LBf is “pounds force” of thrust…not lb-ft as the narrator voices
Russia has a superior military, but thank goodness that Russia prefers Peace. 😊
The most advanced don't mean the most effective. .
Right now some old Russian arms are taking down the most advanced NATO arms in Ukraine every single day.
Great.
That's what British said before the rise of the US.
Since the aircraft carry such powerful explosive, I wonder how huge the damage will be when it's been shot. 😂
BIG
Do you know what scares me as we use the United States if we were losing in a war a world war? I think United States would resort to nuclear.
I was unaware that the us army flew fighter jets
Right?! 😂
One third of a billion bucks for one jet? What a scam...now we know the reason behind our soaring deficits
Great video. The "Son Of BlackBird" that is shown at the start - that looks like how the SR-7* planes might look like today is an interesting concept. You could draw a Triangle around the SR-71's - it would have to be on the larger side but it's possible.
Dispite of all this wephn at the end USA turnout as looser
They should be the best since we grossly overpay for them by a factor of 10X
.
I'm sorry but any introduction that starts "Without a doubt, the United States has always had the most advanced military technology." shows a serious lack of historical perspective and calls into question any conclusion of the author. As just a few examples: the Mark 14 torpedo of WWII, the Sherman tank in Korea, the M-14 rifle in Vietnan and the current Littoral Combat Ships.
That open reveals this as nothing more than a commercial for the U.S. military/industrial complex...😒
This is what is called Yankee ‘GUFF’!
Well, when discussing modern day technology, without even a shadow of doubt, the U.S. dominates in an extreme way so I'll go ahead and forgive the indiscretion. Lol
@@mikejacob3536 🙄🤦🏻♂️
@@jeffpollard7304 Jealousy isn't becoming of you. 🤨
No doubt that the US can develop mighty weapons however, you don't know what your adversaries exactly have developed. You can be proud,but remember, underestimate the other party is the start of a defeat.
Drones most lethal...60 g turns
Still haven't seen anything to replace the A-10
F22 very special bird 🐦 😊
Shes a bad bad bird not to be messed with at all ! 😮
The SU75 and Mig41 currently in Test phase Outclasses these US jets by a long way...no worries for Russia Russia here at all
ruzzia does not have an air force, unless you count 35 planes as an air force.
I want one 😍
Awesome
Served 70-76. We were badass then badass now!
I know it’s irrelevant, but has the US secured a hypersonic missle of its own yet?
👍👍🤣🤣
Nope , neither did they secure a functional rail gun , China did both
@@EricSoulliage If they perform like traditional Chinese "junk", we got nothing to worry about. Ever hear of "Quality fade"? China invented and implemented it.
@@SouthernStorm_61 - Ask Americans about the Sears brand tools after they got taken over by B&D. The factory is closing and Craftsman quality tools were history after B&D got their dirty hands on it.
Check out US Laser Power, its the future. Reach out and touch ya
Great planes!
The only thing that could defeat the F-22 and F-35 is Superman, Man of Steel, and UFOs.
480 rounds of 20mm?? Is that all?
Simple. They don't need more than 480 rounds of 20mm because in any close encounter they will be shot down before they run out of this ammo.
Blow your own trumpet 🎉🎉🎉🎉 toot..toot...toot...toot..
The Raptor is amazing. However, ground to air missles can cover huge areas and they'd take it down and anything else with ease.
they cannot get a lock good enough to hit it.
That’s why they’re destroyed first
The radar lock has to occur on an RDS the size of a bumblebee. Maybe Putin likes your analysis but it is not true. Low frequency radar has a very wide field of view.... too late. RIP
@@teddeebayre3433 let them believe that 🤮 it’ll make things a lot easier when 💩 hits the fan
If you can not track it, you can not target it genius.
with all the best weapons, never win any war in Vietnam, Iran, Afganstan !
The F-15 Eagle never even came close to being beaten 😮..
Yeah,,ok there Murica ;-)
You mean to say why the US can not beat China and Russia... 😅😅😅😅🎉
You can also say most priced aircraft of the world which is correct
I hear they breakdown slot because they're electronics are made from scrap. This is why they have to keep making new ones. Lockheed Martin was Scottish firm until about 10 years ago, but Scotland got rid of them for a republic.
@@Darren-fm3pe waw, incredible