Three key documents from the newly released JFK assassination records

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 901

  • @ynp1978
    @ynp1978 7 років тому +239

    " To convince the public that Oswald was the real assassin". That one statement pretty much sums up the situation.

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah... It sure does.

    • @codacreator6162
      @codacreator6162 3 роки тому +19

      Especially given the context in which it was written. Immediately following the assassination, nobody had any reason to doubt Oswald's guilt. But Mr. Hoover seems to suspect they will have reason at some point. What was he aware of?

    • @stevebrown8368
      @stevebrown8368 3 роки тому +27

      I never believed the Warren report

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому +22

      @@stevebrown8368 Warren report was fiction.

    • @dreamingrightnow1174
      @dreamingrightnow1174 3 роки тому +2

      Like most things, that comment can be read either way.. It's just another Rorschach's test.

  • @BigDaddy-vr2ut
    @BigDaddy-vr2ut 3 роки тому +45

    I watched an interview with Bush on they New he was is the same area as Kennedy was when he was shot. And he replied I can’t remember.. out of all the people that were still alive when Kennedy was shot unless they were very young , all can remember exactly what they were doing when the heard the news about Kennedy getting shot. Everyone except George hw Bush knows what they was doing on that day. It’s kinda like the same situation, about 9-11. And the trade center bombing.. everyone can remember were they were on that day. It just so happens all the bushes were in Florida that day. No where Near the crime screen. We all know that was an inside job too.

    • @SaadKhan-og9pp
      @SaadKhan-og9pp 2 роки тому +4

      Have you watched "A Richman's trick"?

    • @Elegant_Sausage
      @Elegant_Sausage 2 роки тому +3

      You aren't wrong. I wasn't alive when he was assassinated, but I know where my parents were and my grandparents. I know my grandma was vacuuming when she was stopped with the news. Everyone knows where they were unless they ended up suffering a head injury or other such memory loss. HW is full of it. Well, was.

    • @BigDaddy-vr2ut
      @BigDaddy-vr2ut 2 роки тому +1

      @@SaadKhan-og9pp no I haven’t

    • @SaadKhan-og9pp
      @SaadKhan-og9pp 2 роки тому +1

      @@BigDaddy-vr2ut you should, everyone should, if UA-cam hasn't got it removed yet. Search: "JFK to 9/11, everything is a Richman's trick"
      It most probably starts with the speech, that killed JFK

    • @terryatpi
      @terryatpi 2 роки тому +1

      Everything is a rich man’s trick. Just watched. Really wild. Can find it on UA-cam. 3 1/2 scary hours

  • @melindajones9462
    @melindajones9462 7 років тому +131

    if the doc's are not incriminating - then why have they been sealed for so long- what's the big deal.

    • @ClevelandKaz440
      @ClevelandKaz440 6 років тому +9

      That's the million dollar question Melinda? Obviously there hiding something after all these years, but what is it?? Your guess is as good as mine.

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 5 років тому +8

      Some of those diocs can damage people who are still living people incrimidated by rumors etc but docs exonerating people such as the policeman guarding the entrance to the police station who the conspiracy people said he let ruby pass down that ramp were released showing ruby said he stuck down the ramp when the guard turned his back to let a car out driven by detective pearce this was released after the guard was dead his daughter was so grateful saying that had worried her dad to death and he wiuld be so glad his name was cleared

    • @danield9105
      @danield9105 4 роки тому +4

      National Security....lol

    • @niyomphusopha6613
      @niyomphusopha6613 4 роки тому

      Abiding time for cover-up and destroying the relevant documents. What about the us law/constitution says " Plausible deniability is vested right for the powers that be or for the deep state ?

    • @PHUSHEY
      @PHUSHEY 3 роки тому +1

      @@randyharris3175 Some people would call that negligence and he should have been reprimanded.

  • @yewtewbewser
    @yewtewbewser 6 років тому +63

    Dear journalist ending by "more likely it would have been destroyed", you should have reminded the viewers that many critical documents have been destroyed since the beginning of the investigation. Starting with Oswald's deposition the day he was caught by the Dallas police.

    • @williamweinheimer3930
      @williamweinheimer3930 10 місяців тому

      The FBI does not destroy files, they may hide, they may bury, but they do not destroy.

  • @cliffnote7058
    @cliffnote7058 6 років тому +279

    The name they are still hiding is .... GEORGE H W BUSH!

    • @redjirachi1
      @redjirachi1 6 років тому +3

      How's that possible, Bush wasn't even working with the CIA at the time

    • @southsideman4891
      @southsideman4891 6 років тому +27

      LOL - AWWW NOW, YOURE SUPPOSED TO SAY GOOD THINGS ABOUT HIM NOW - REMEMBER WHEN HE PICKED THE PRETTY DAISEYS IN DALLAS THE DAY JFK DIED????
      NEITHER DID HE - HE DIDNT REMEMBER WHERE HE WAS WHEN JFK DIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @jmhproductions7335
      @jmhproductions7335 6 років тому +7

      John Porteous he worked under LBJ

    • @michaelwalker5102
      @michaelwalker5102 6 років тому +23

      Beat me to it,... the evidence definitely points to him...
      He’s the ONLY PERSON that “can’t remember” where he was when Kennedy was killed,...
      That’s like not remembering 9/11... when we all watched it on tv or were there,..

    • @p_bugs_2644
      @p_bugs_2644 6 років тому +18

      Wtf!? Bush was head of the CIA at that time? He headed the CIA for one year in 1976-77. Kennedy was shot in 1963. Wtf are you talking about?

  • @vernpascal1531
    @vernpascal1531 7 років тому +51

    You have proof right there on 11-24-63, after Ruby killed Oswald( The only major event of the Assassination that is not in doubt) that Hoover closed the case on conspiracy before there was any investigation.

    • @christiansoldier77
      @christiansoldier77 7 років тому +5

      Vern Pascal actually Ruby didnt kill Oswald they just pinned it on him

    • @rebar33
      @rebar33 6 років тому +3

      Sort of like Kavenaugh

    • @BodaciousBob66
      @BodaciousBob66 4 роки тому +5

      Christian Soldier pinned it on him? But he shot him on live tv lol.

    • @ronaldbarnes1746
      @ronaldbarnes1746 3 роки тому

      Its so obvious that its a cover up with the FBI that the public cannot believe how obvious it is. The bigger the lie, the more people cannot believe its a lie. Single Magic Bullet theory is actually hilarious and mathematically impossible. The american people with the help of the media is totally blind on this case.

    • @mrambassador114
      @mrambassador114 2 роки тому +1

      Hoover "closed" the case as soon as he received the news from Dallas that Lee Oswald had been arrested and was being interrogated.

  • @gunofapreacherman1340
    @gunofapreacherman1340 7 років тому +55

    “Back and to the left” - there was more than one shooter. Case closed.

    • @cammontreuil7509
      @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому +6

      Certainly 2 different kinds of bullets used would indicate 2 different guns.

    • @ericrose3877
      @ericrose3877 3 роки тому

      Case not closed.

    • @aliciacoble7854
      @aliciacoble7854 2 роки тому +1

      That head shot and throat shot both came from the front , the shots I'm the back and Connolly wrist came from the book depository ...the shots missed were from the book depository as well ..at least 10 shots were fired 6 hitting 4 missing or not documented to cover up the lone assassin one shooter

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      Kennedy's head goes slightly forward at the instant of impact. Case open.

    • @easyenetwork2023
      @easyenetwork2023 2 роки тому

      Garrison was a liar too. He and Hoover both are carnival barkers, but Hoover at least ran the FBI well.

  • @carolusmartellus6552
    @carolusmartellus6552 6 років тому +16

    Why J. Edgar was concerned was because he was behind the assassination. He had the best opportunity and motive to do that

    • @canofbeer2397
      @canofbeer2397 3 роки тому +1

      Bush sr did it. Hoover had nothing to do with it. And left a paper trail leading to bush

  • @davidd1395
    @davidd1395 4 роки тому +27

    The Government doesn’t believe Oswald is the lone assassin, they want us to believe it.

    • @gbennett58
      @gbennett58 2 роки тому +14

      I remember Walter Cronkite saying Oswald was the lone assassin within days of the event, before there had been any investigation. So the media was in on it too. Just like it is today.

    • @frederickloucks4865
      @frederickloucks4865 2 роки тому

      @@gbennett58 Yes ...and it continues with the liberal press ' ignoring that sterling role model and citizen, Hunter Biden and his totally incoherent , incompetent father Joe .

    • @rio.escobo
      @rio.escobo Рік тому +2

      @@gbennett58like a rehearsal script heard or leaked over radio or news back than, how was so heard and what was sketchy that it sounded like a rehearsal before the asssssination even happened right?

  • @dannelson2364
    @dannelson2364 6 років тому +41

    "...the US govt has long believed Oswald was a lone gunman..." WTF? What about the special senate commitee in 1979 that said he probably wasn't the only
    gunman? The lies keep piling up...

    • @ivana_333
      @ivana_333 4 роки тому +4

      Trusting our US Government is like trusting a pedophile with your child

    • @ag4allgood
      @ag4allgood 4 роки тому +3

      They won't release the information on this event in Dallas & its almost 60 YEARS later ! The ONLY reason the government won't release the info is because they are HIDING the TRUTH ! The Secret Service had a job that day & they blew it. SS Agent Roy Kellerman was in charge of the detail to protect JFK that day & his actions that day show a clear cover up ! WHY ? There is a documentary with a seasoned detective Colin McLaren that goes into Dealy Plaza & does a crime scene investigation. He uncovers evidence leading to the person who fired that fatal head shot. Why did it happened explained clearly ? WHY was it covered up ? The evidence he uncovers & all the facts line up to one conclusion ! The name of the documentary is " JFK The Smoking Gun ". The FULL UNCUT version is the one to see. The UA-cam cut version leaves out so much info & evidence. Well worth the time to see it !

    • @alexdenault10101
      @alexdenault10101 4 роки тому

      The driver on the vehicle took the shot

    • @ag4allgood
      @ag4allgood 4 роки тому +4

      @@alexdenault10101 Lay off the drugs Alex !

    • @alexdenault10101
      @alexdenault10101 4 роки тому

      @@ag4allgood watch the video in slow motion . Right after the sign after jfk grabs his throat .

  • @raymondroberts8709
    @raymondroberts8709 2 роки тому +17

    Every shot that hit JFK came from a different direction. He was made to know in his final seconds of consciousness what was really happening; hit in the back, then throat, then head shots.

    • @DizzyDollars
      @DizzyDollars 2 роки тому +2

      Scary 😧

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +2

      Rubbish.

    • @CityBoy5705
      @CityBoy5705 2 роки тому +2

      Absolutely Agreed.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +2

      @@CityBoy5705 Victims' wounds all line up on a perfect trajectory straight back to Oswald's window. Witnesses under that window firmly heard 3 shots, all from directly overhead. Kennedy had one cratered entrance wound on the back of the skull, an impossible shot from the knoll but a clear one for Oswald, and a massive outward explosion at the right temple, also inconsistent with a shot from the knoll. A knoll shooter would have had every witness nearby (eg. Zapruder, who had no idea where the shots came from) flat on their faces when he started firing. A shot into his throat would also be inconsistent with a shot from the knoll.

    • @raymondroberts8709
      @raymondroberts8709 2 роки тому +3

      @@aaronz7056 😆 Fed says what?

  • @Judge_Judy
    @Judge_Judy 4 роки тому +7

    oswald new something ..he realised he was the patsy and beelined it to the movie theater hoping he would have plenty of witness protection

    • @jacobjones5269
      @jacobjones5269 7 днів тому

      Or, he just murdered a cop, discarded his jacket to change his appearance, hid from cops near a shoe store, then snuck into a theatre, because it’s a great place to hide when half the city is looking for you?..
      And when none of that worked, he tried to commit suicide by cop when he was surrounded in a theatre?.. lol..
      There’s a pattern there..

  • @therebrand9018
    @therebrand9018 3 роки тому +11

    Plausible deniability is literally what keeps all these crooks for ever being held liable. The law and figure heads work fro the CIA not the other way around.

  • @mizzyroro
    @mizzyroro 2 роки тому +2

    If Helms denied it, why has his answer remained classified?

  • @justinmartinez680
    @justinmartinez680 7 років тому +5

    Oswald was in on the assassination but he wasn't the shooter. The Fbi cia and the mob were all involved in the shooting there were 3 shooters

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      No evidence for this rubbish.

  • @umbertoongaban2892
    @umbertoongaban2892 4 роки тому +1

    And now we know that Hoover and LBJ where in the house of Clint. Murchison the night before the assasenation
    To talk about the assasenation, they with other TRAITORS. The misttres of LBJ brought it all to light.
    Also these men like NIXON, FORD AND BUSH SR they all are TRAITORS.

  • @lolawalsh9187
    @lolawalsh9187 3 роки тому +6

    No one believes Oswald was the lone gunman

    • @cammontreuil7509
      @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому

      The only reason Oswald left after the shooting because he did some of it.
      3 spent shells at the window. 3 shots heard. But head shot was explosive bullet. So 4 shots ?
      The number of bullets shot doesn't match the sound everyone heard.

    • @mikelldaley9078
      @mikelldaley9078 2 роки тому

      amen

    • @davidwilliams4498
      @davidwilliams4498 Рік тому

      Actually I have read countless comments an there is still many more than a few who believe Oswald was a lone wolf. Everything uncovered since that awful day pretty much proves he was not only 1 involved an only 1 who shot at jfk

  • @chrisjacks2599
    @chrisjacks2599 2 роки тому +9

    The "government" knew from day one that Oswald was not "the" gunman, he wasn't even "one" of the gunmen.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      All credible evidence points at Oswald.

    • @chrisjacks2599
      @chrisjacks2599 2 роки тому

      @@aaronz7056 You watch way too much propaganda, what about the hole in the upper windshield of the pres limo that Frank Sturgis (Bay of pigs) claims he fired from the front, said "he missed". The witness reports of the grassy knoll, and we know who that shooter was too, and the rifle that was used, and the round that was used, and the FBI recovered the shell casing on the top of that fence. A CIA officer named G Gordon Liddy (look him up) is said to have killed officer Tippet to help Oswald escape. Wake up kid. It was CIA from start to end.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      @@chrisjacks2599 You warn me about watching too much propaganda as you champion Frank Sturgis and G. Gordon Liddy with such ironclad terms as "Sturgis claims" and "is said to have..." LOL

  • @lisar3006
    @lisar3006 7 років тому +112

    My bet is Oswalt never fired a gun at anyone that day. Like he told the press"i am just a patsy"

    • @atlormerjo8830
      @atlormerjo8830 7 років тому +2

      lisar3006 why wasn't his rifle there at house when they got there

    • @jfknumbers1345
      @jfknumbers1345 7 років тому

      Lisa R: Lee probably killed officer Tippit.

    • @dallasbrubaker6054
      @dallasbrubaker6054 6 років тому +6

      Because the ones who made him a patsy made sure it looked like he did it; thus, taking the rifle.

    • @dallasbrubaker6054
      @dallasbrubaker6054 6 років тому +2

      Probably not

    • @kayejeyeracer
      @kayejeyeracer 6 років тому +10

      Correct, how would he know he was a patsy unless he knew of and was aware or part of the conspiracy and an agent.

  • @marcuswelby2644
    @marcuswelby2644 2 роки тому

    If our government wasn't involved they would release more of the files. We can forgive the former U.S.S.R/The Mafia/Cuba etc. but could we ever trust our government again if they were involved?

  • @jamesboaz4787
    @jamesboaz4787 5 років тому +7

    Did you really just say the government believes Oswald was a lone gunman? Wtf is wrong with you?

  • @glennhopkins2643
    @glennhopkins2643 Місяць тому +1

    If there was a conspiracy - then what was the reason for the assassination ?

  • @aaronpaterson1615
    @aaronpaterson1615 3 роки тому +6

    I truly believe Oswald cintacted the FBI, or they him, and learnt from him that he was engaged by the CIA to do things such as pass himself off as a Cuban sympathizer when Guy Bannister paid Oswald to hand out leaflets for the Fair Play For Cuba Committee.
    We now know VT Lee national jead of the FPFC committee and a secretary for that organisation who was chief editor of FPFC publishing that was distributed claimed there was never a Dallas, Cleveland or New Orleans chapter of the Fair Play For Cuba committee in 1963.
    Oswald was really tasked with spying on American-based anti-Cubans such as Carlos Bringuier, Antonio Valencia and others who were pissed off with Kennedy not invading Cuba.
    Oswald was exactly as he said, a Patsy.
    J Edgar Hoover had a file on him since he returned from Russia.
    Jack Ruby was a gun-runner storing arms in Dallas for shipment to Israel and anti-Cubans.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      Beliefs are not evidence.

    • @johndonovan5752
      @johndonovan5752 2 роки тому

      See former FBI agent James Hosty's book "Assignment Oswald." Hosty had tried to interview Oswald's wife Marina. He said that Oswald did stop by the FBI office in Dallas and left a note, but the note only said that he (Hosty) should stay away from Oswald's wife.

  • @bebo5558
    @bebo5558 3 роки тому +4

    President Trump didn't delay the release of the files, he was told NO, to a total release!

    • @davidwilliams4498
      @davidwilliams4498 Рік тому

      Trump himself probably realize he didn't want to be like Kennedy an left it alone. Mafia CIA any of Texas big wigs from the day could had Trump taken out. No doubt about that. Trump pretty smart. He knew he had to leave this alone.

  • @peternewman3487
    @peternewman3487 3 роки тому +11

    As I understand a nitrate test was carried out on Lee Oswald. No nitrates we’re found on Lee Oswald.

    • @Caeruleo
      @Caeruleo 3 роки тому +1

      "As I understand a nitrate test was carried out on Lee Oswald. No nitrates we’re found on Lee Oswald."
      You understand incorrectly. Nitrates were found on one or both of his hands. None were found on his cheek. However, it is a well known fact that the tests for nitrates are not always reliable, and do not always prove either way whether or not a person has recently fired a gun.

    • @peternewman3487
      @peternewman3487 3 роки тому +2

      @@Caeruleo Not true. There is so much evidence proving that L H O did not fire that rifle nor was it possible that he could have fired so many shots from an awful poor quality rifle. But you will only believe what you want to believe.

    • @Caeruleo
      @Caeruleo 3 роки тому

      @@peternewman3487 "There is so much evidence proving that L H O did not fire that rifle nor was it possible that he could have fired so many shots from an awful poor quality rifle."
      Oh? Perhaps you can outline in detail what that "evidence" is then. Just "saying" there is "so much evidence" isn't good enough. Anybody can just "say" there's a lot of evidence. I've long ago lost count of how many times I've heard or seen a person make a statement like that, and then it turned out later that they were merely repeating proven myths about the assassination and/or repeating unproven allegations. I will be happy to discuss this evidence with an open mind, as I have done many times in the past on the internet, not just here on UA-cam, but in thousands of newsgroup articles since 2002. But of course I have to first know what the evidence is that you think you have before I will know what to discuss. ;-)
      I can already see that you might possibly be repeating a myth about the assassination by saying the rifle was of "poor quality." That has been said by some authors, but not by nearly all.
      "But you will only believe what you want to believe."
      You do not have nearly enough evidence about me to know with anything even remotely approaching certainty that I am such a person. You've so far only read a few comments by me posted on UA-cam. I doubt very much that you have read more than a tiny, tiny percentage of what I have written about the assassination in the past 19 years. As a matter of fact I have changed my mind several times about the assassination as, over the years, I came across information that was new to me at the time. That is the mark of an open-minded person, not a closed minded one.
      Since you're so quick to jump an unfounded conclusion about me personally, how do the rest of us know that you're not equally quick to unfounded conclusions about the JFK assassination? ;-)
      Let's just stick to the known facts, shall we? What is this evidence that proves LHO did not fire a rifle? Please describe it in detail. Thanks.

    • @peternewman3487
      @peternewman3487 3 роки тому +1

      @@Caeruleo. I’m not coping out of answering you but I have read over and over Jim Garrisons book called on the trail of the assassins and a book called the Kennedy conspiracy by Anthony Summers and I have drawn my own conclusions about it. Have you read any of these books ? I was just fourteen and living in England when a news flash came on evening tv telling us the JFK had been shot. The film JFK really got me into being interested in JFK’s death and then I found Jim Garrisons book which I find fascinating.

    • @cammontreuil7509
      @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому

      @@peternewman3487 Then why did Lee flee ?

  • @kayakbandits9894
    @kayakbandits9894 7 років тому +23

    The reason he doesn’t mention the surgeons report on 2 shooter is because it’s not in the script.

    • @aliciacoble7854
      @aliciacoble7854 2 роки тому

      The autopsy report is actually released ,it's like 8 pages

  • @shadowdance4666
    @shadowdance4666 6 років тому +2

    There’s no way trump is ever going to release all the rest of those because he’s part of the establishment deep state. They are destroyed or just won’t be released. He’s not going to get arrested or impeached. It’s a sideshow profession wrestling

    • @verdis23rdoperaunballoinma39
      @verdis23rdoperaunballoinma39 4 роки тому +1

      So sad, the tag team going on today is a disgrace to humanity --how many deluded and "buying it"....

  • @shihyuchu6753
    @shihyuchu6753 2 роки тому +7

    The most dishonest guy I've known is a guy named WARREN COMMISSION

    • @jb-vb8un
      @jb-vb8un 2 роки тому

      have to contact the 3rd person in the car @ CHAPPAQUIDDICK

    • @shihyuchu6753
      @shihyuchu6753 2 роки тому

      @@jb-vb8un Could you explain please?

  • @MattMaloneMD
    @MattMaloneMD 2 роки тому +3

    I think they had to convince the public that Oswald was the lone assassin, because if anyone else was accused (the Mafia, the Cubans, the Russians, the military) there would have been all out war against that faction. Every Italian restaurant would have been fire bombed (leading to further retaliations from the mafia). War would have erupted against Cuba or Russia. They needed someone who they could blame, and then dispose of. With this in mind, I've always thought that Oswald was set up to be exactly what he said he was: a "patsy", to take the blame. Someone pulled the strings, found him that job, put him in that building (if not that window) on the right day, so he could be arrested and blamed. So who had the power to do that? Who knew the parade route? Who could make sure the car was open topped? Who had links to the Mafia, so that Jack Ruby could be called in to end Oswald? Don't mess with the C.I.A!

    • @MarkHewitt
      @MarkHewitt 5 місяців тому

      Who was the man who was running Oswald in Dallas. The answer was George de Mohrenschildt.
      De Mohrenschildt committed suicide in 1977, after an investigator from the House Select Committee On Assassinations contacted him for an interview.
      It seems that De Mohrenschildt was under pressure so he wrote to a close friend in Washington asking for help - George H Bush.

  • @RaspySquares
    @RaspySquares 4 роки тому +17

    "George"...JKF jr magazine...he knows.

    • @ag4allgood
      @ag4allgood 4 роки тому +3

      You mean Secret Service Agent George Hickey who stood up in the car behind JFK with an AR 15 loaded ready to go after hearing the 1st 2 shots ? That George is who JFK Jr named the magazine after ? Now that is interesting that he knew ! If that is true he probably knew Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman & his crew pushed the gurney with JFK's body past a screaming Dr Earl Rose Dallas County Medical Examiner who was trying to stop him because Texas Law states the autopsy of a death in Texas gets DONE in Texas ! JFK Jr would know that Agent Roy Kellerman at Bethesda Naval Hospital confiscated all pictures / notes / un developed rolls of film during that autopsy never to be seen again !
      JFK Jr would know X-ray Technician Jerol Custer was told by his boss to tape 6.5 mm bullet fragments to his father's skull & take X-Rays soon after the autopsy was done ! JFK Jr would know Jerol Custer & many other key people was forced to sign a GAG ORDERS threatening LONG Prison terms if they talked about what happened there at Bethesda ! JFK Jr had to know that key witnesses were NEVER called by the Warren Commission purposefully to cover up the facts ! JFK Jr would have to know the Ballistic analysis done by Howard Donahue led right back to the follow up car back left seat by the trajectory of that fatal head shot ! Want more answers read the book or see the FULL UNCUT version of " JFK The Smoking Gun " which has a detective doing a crime scene analysis of that whole event & beyond. Absolutely the BEST explanation of what happened that day in Dealy Plaza by far !

    • @estelleb1587
      @estelleb1587 4 роки тому +1

      @@ag4allgood
      George Bush Jr, who killed President Kennedy. It's out there, a pic of him at the Dallas rally, as a 17 yr old.

  • @mrFalconlem
    @mrFalconlem 5 років тому +10

    I really think it telling. That his testimony was redacted. Pitiful that it hasn’t been released.

  • @jimpalmer4916
    @jimpalmer4916 Рік тому

    The truth of who was really involved disappeared a long time ago. And so did everyone else involved by now.

  • @robertwilcock7112
    @robertwilcock7112 3 роки тому +4

    The U.S. Marines stated that Oswald only just cleared his rifle test on the firing range by 2 points, he was not a good shot. Had he not cleared those 2 points he would have been kicked out of the Marines as unfit for combat, yet expert state that the shots from the book depositary were extremely difficult.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +2

      His marine scorebook alone demonstrates he could score 48 out of 50 multiple times with rapid fire on a target twice as far away as JFK was from Oswald's window.

    • @jb-vb8un
      @jb-vb8un 2 роки тому

      and thats when Oswald still had the HOOK ON HIS FOOT

  • @Rocky-xx2zg
    @Rocky-xx2zg 3 роки тому +4

    I find it interesting that some records were held back to protect George H. W. Bush. JMO

  • @jasonhenry5by5
    @jasonhenry5by5 7 років тому +14

    The Washington compost wants to makes a stand on this issue ?
    Since we're talking about the new releases how about the report from the surgeon general staying Kennedy was shot from the front

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому +1

      Unless there are people out there who just enjoy living in a fantasy, most smart people know the head shot was from the front...

  • @4fundays
    @4fundays Місяць тому +1

    Still lying to the people...ridiculous.

  • @theliberalelitist
    @theliberalelitist 7 років тому +30

    so much more info than what you discuss. the reason is clear why your readers are leaving.

  • @benjamindover4471
    @benjamindover4471 4 роки тому +2

    IT'S 2021. GEORGE BUSH SR. IS DEAD. FILES CAN BE RELEASED NOW. THANK YOU.

    • @aliciacoble7854
      @aliciacoble7854 2 роки тому

      There's still people who are alive that were involved that were under orders so ,it's protecting them

  • @hurricanemaude795
    @hurricanemaude795 3 роки тому +3

    Why Trump did not release all the documents? Who are the people they still protect? May be some very wealth family from Texas? 🤔

  • @charlesbennett7688
    @charlesbennett7688 2 роки тому +1

    Cover up crook C I A like today crooks cover up

  • @ElZappata
    @ElZappata 3 роки тому +6

    Thank God for the Washington post and other “news outlets“, to interpret these hard truths for us… Speaking for the rest of the sheep we appreciate the Moses

    • @easyenetwork2023
      @easyenetwork2023 2 роки тому

      Would you rather them bury it and not talk about it at all?

    • @arcanondrum6543
      @arcanondrum6543 Рік тому

      @@easyenetwork2023 That would look suspicious. Better to massage the story to a narrative.
      It surprises me that Woodward and Bernstein weren't thrown off their story but maybe Ben Bradlee was given some leeway and Carl and Bob shocked the managing editors with something that suddenly couldn't be ignored.

  • @cjalexanderjr8811
    @cjalexanderjr8811 3 місяці тому

    What’s the deal with Jack Ruby?

  • @jamesexploringonline872
    @jamesexploringonline872 4 роки тому +4

    Come on Trump hasn't the balls to do anything related to JFK, I mean ...

  • @cammontreuil7509
    @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому +4

    Head shot was an explosive bullet. So are we to believe Oswald had 2 bullets that were not and 1 that was ?

  • @larrylindsey1497
    @larrylindsey1497 3 роки тому +2

    If Oswald was CIA, then the CIA would have gotten Oswald a job at the Book Depositary and planned the parade route.

  • @robotpanda77
    @robotpanda77 7 років тому +42

    Can somebody get this guy a cup of coffee or something? He sounds like he went the last three days without sleep and then recorded this.

    • @SenderBudYerGood
      @SenderBudYerGood 7 років тому +1

      He's not the only one. I wasn't even a thought in my father tissues in the bathroom when this happened and yet so much of what needs to be answered here would explain everything I've ever been taught to know as the truth. This shit is bigger than anyone can suggest.

    • @boxlessthinking
      @boxlessthinking 5 років тому

      the CIA had just wiped his mind.

    • @SomeoneHasToSayIt2525
      @SomeoneHasToSayIt2525 5 років тому +1

      You’d be groggy too after a 36 hour marathon of cruising DuPont Circle.

    • @kathrynfauble9053
      @kathrynfauble9053 4 роки тому

      @Cultural Marxist Watch What evidence do you have for narrator Ian Shapira favoring the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, DC? The “p” in Dupont is lower case BTW. The neighborhood’s LGBTQ status is well-known. Mr. Shapira’s private life isn’t.

  • @benruffo1197
    @benruffo1197 3 роки тому +3

    A security camera in Mexico City shows a man claiming to be Oswald was NOT Oswald. An Oswald impersonator.

    • @jb-vb8un
      @jb-vb8un 2 роки тому

      security camera in 1962 MX ?? .... was Senor Wences playing Acapulo or Jose Jiminez in Chiuawhawha

  • @willmiles100
    @willmiles100 7 років тому +4

    All documents will not be released as long as the real conspirators are still alive.

    • @aliciacoble7854
      @aliciacoble7854 2 роки тому

      And the actual innocent ppl that were under orders

    • @davidwilliams4498
      @davidwilliams4498 Рік тому

      I'd bet any video or pics that showed who was shooting has been destroyed long time ago. I have no doubt. Any employee who was disgruntled at the gov could have seen the pics or video. I just bet they are gone. Only classified left is talk from gov officials why this an why that. Only way my option is if somehow someone finds a pic or video from that day that shows a face an gun as motorcade comes by. If that don't happen we go on an not know

  • @chriswolney5002
    @chriswolney5002 5 років тому +8

    The first memo that is discussed in this video, written by Hoover, is also referenced in a documentary that I saw over a decade ago. I believe it may have been in the special features DVD that came with the JFK movie DVD. The statement in that memo that this video points to is not a recent discovery. However, the other 2 parts of documents discussed in this video are intriguing and I've not seen or heard of these. I was in junior high when 'JFK' came out. I've always been skeptical of the government's actions following the assassination after that movie sparked my interest.

  • @graemeosborne584
    @graemeosborne584 2 роки тому

    Freedom will not be lived when those that are free are silent

  • @7070Lauren1
    @7070Lauren1 7 років тому +11

    well now i know clearly, where some cia money goes, washington compost!

  • @thelmatucker7598
    @thelmatucker7598 2 роки тому +1

    The only way to ever know the truth in this matter is to ask God face to face without the government being present.

  • @kareemsc9913
    @kareemsc9913 6 років тому +5

    Also in the document that No one is talking about: the fact that in the documents someone tipped off the FBI (I believe) that Police officer JD Tippet was one of the shooters. And honestly it makes sense. He was the one to find Oswald first based off of a very generic description and was killed. If it was Oswald that killed tippet why would Oswald empty his shells from his revolver next to the body of tippet?

    • @PANCHOVILLAMATO
      @PANCHOVILLAMATO 3 роки тому +2

      And how is it that LHO's gun was fully loaded when arrested at the theatre?

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      @@PANCHOVILLAMATO He was seen reloading it.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      J.D. Tippit was a police officer with a wife and three children who was decorated for bravery, gave his life in the cause of his duty and was laid to rest with full honors from his department. Your irresponsible rubbish "theory" is obscene and a middle finger to his family.

    • @portugal5698
      @portugal5698 Рік тому +1

      @@aaronz7056Tippit was more than likely involved, but in the words of the great, wise Robert DeNiro, *”He was involved alright, but stupidly!!”* What does that mean exactly?? Well, facts and history seem to prove he was one of Jack Ruby’s closest customers and friends and was also close to fellow officer, Roscoe White who more than likely used him as a gettaway driver for Oswald as many witnesses stated they saw the police car stop and Oswald GETTING OUT and running away from the two officers. At that point, either White did the deed or both White and LHO put him in a crossfire upon Tippet either refusing to cooperate or putting pieces together!! Reguardless, hidden, burried evidence shows that Tippet did indeed pick Oswald up at some point as LHO’s roommate testified that she saw a police car w/ two officers pull up to the house and beep twice minutes after the assassination???

    • @bold58
      @bold58 Рік тому

      From what I learned Tippet was a Dallas police officer who had financial troubles and was taking money from the mob through Jack Ruby therefore Ruby had some degree of control over him.
      Tippets mission that day was to find Oswald at his rooming house and eliminate him.
      Unfortunately for J D. Tippet Oswald had already left for the theatre to supposedly meet his CIA handler..
      So Tippit saw a man in the neighborhood he thought might be Oswald and called the man over to his car . What was really unfortunate for Tippet was the man he called over was a government hitman who was also sent to take out Oswald . This is the one area where the mob and the CIA failed to coordinate .
      The hitman fearing he was going to be found out then shot Tippet .
      Tippet was one of those police officers who did not start his career intending to be evil he just fell into a trap.

  • @manishagangawala3921
    @manishagangawala3921 3 роки тому +2

    If it absolves ones conscience to label LHO as the assassin just go ahead and do it why contort yourself to fit a square peg in a round hole? If it facts you wish to prove or disprove LHOs guilt then reiterate the facts. No one planning the assassination of a head of State would purchase a weapon traceable through mail order when he could have used a false identity & purchased a real sniper weapon. The Carcano was a carbine from WWI of poor construction and accuracy. A known defect was its chamber exploding from jamming of a round. Every round had to be loaded independently making it impossible to fire rapidly.The rifle went out of production between 1918 & 1920. Ammunition for this rifle was no longer available as evidenced by the company, licensed to make this ammunition, to the Warren Commission. The 6th floor had plenty of workers fixing the flooring that day. A black worker gave evidence that the partly eaten chicken sandwich & empty soda can was his. He denied seeing Oswald at or near that window on the 6th floor. immediately after the shooting a policeman & LHO's supervisor saw him at the soda dispenser on the 2nd floor. A news reporter riding in the press bus as part of the Presidential motorcade had asked LHO at the entrance of TSBD, shortly after the shooting, as to where he could find a phone. LHO's finger prints were never found on the weapon alleged to have been used in the assassination. A palm print of little significance was found. LHO never tested pos for gun powder residue on his hands or face. The acoustic analysis indicated at least 4 shots 1st 3 were fired in under 8 sec to be clear it was 6.8 sec. 3 sharpshooters were unable to replicate LHO's feat or hit a stationary target 30 feet away with the rifle he alleged used. LHO shot no one on Nov 22nd 1963 he was a patsy because the person he was supposed to have picked him up immediately after the shooting never showed that is when it dawned on LHO he was the fall guy.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      The dictabelt acoustic recording was discredited and found invalid 40 years ago. There is no evidence for the more paranoid parts of this rubbish.

  • @hawkfall
    @hawkfall 3 роки тому +2

    The key is the radio audio record from the police motorcycle, showing more than 3 shoots.

    • @jb-vb8un
      @jb-vb8un 2 роки тому

      NO no no - IT it it - IS is is - NOT not not - THE the KEY key

  • @wunderdoggy
    @wunderdoggy 7 років тому +5

    The Katzenbach memo was already public knowledge.

  • @moobrien1747
    @moobrien1747 2 роки тому +1

    To convince the American public that
    I am not a polesmoker

  • @shadowdance4666
    @shadowdance4666 6 років тому +2

    Oswald was a D+ shooter in the marines. No way he made that shot once

    • @johnadams5489
      @johnadams5489 6 років тому

      shadowdance4666
      Baloney. Oswald was a good shot. He qualified as a Sharpshooter in Marine Basic Training and a Marksman right before he got out. I am a US Army veteran and no military gives out qualifications they have not earned. He was a good enough shot to pull it off and he did. All the rest is BS.

    • @michaelivey1087
      @michaelivey1087 5 років тому +1

      @@johnadams5489 Keep living the lie. Oswald did not shoot anyone that day. Just no evidence to suppport it. ALL the so called evidence was fabricated. Chain of evidence was never followed. An honest jury would never have convicted Oswald at trial. The prosecutors would have been laughed out of court.

    • @d.b.1858
      @d.b.1858 5 років тому

      @@michaelivey1087 John Adam's, is a lurking troll on all of the JFK videos. He has many aliases. He only lurks in replies to comments. To attack people who don't believe the, "Official Version".

    • @michaelivey1087
      @michaelivey1087 5 років тому

      @@d.b.1858 yes. And he is vicious! Tough guy he is. As well as stupid!!! LOL

  • @cammontreuil7509
    @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому +1

    Hoover. Don't forget he wanted to get rid of JFK too.

  • @williamrush841
    @williamrush841 7 років тому +1

    EVERY ONE KNOWS WHO DID IT BUT THEY KEEP STICKING TO THE OFFICIAL STORY!!

  • @inyourgenes
    @inyourgenes 4 роки тому +1

    Any updates??? It is now May 2020......

  • @jordan390a
    @jordan390a 7 років тому +3

    Another Mockingbird operative......

  • @easyenetwork2023
    @easyenetwork2023 2 роки тому +1

    When it is safe, every document not sensitive needs to be released. I understand not every document can be safely released, but most of these files should be declassified.

  • @philmackraken2084
    @philmackraken2084 6 років тому +3

    What 'entity' gave Jack Ruby the way's and means to get close to Oswald at the Dallas Police Department? WHo came down from New York City to give Jack his cover to get close to take out the informant? WHo was Jack protecting? If you can answer these questions then you might find out what it was really all about.

    • @aliciacoble7854
      @aliciacoble7854 2 роки тому

      That doc won't be released ,due to the fact who did that was ordered by a higher up so it's to protect the innocent one

    • @mrambassador114
      @mrambassador114 2 роки тому

      Good questions.

  • @fieldlanguagerecords7041
    @fieldlanguagerecords7041 4 роки тому +1

    This was the most lackluster effort by a reporter to suppress the gravity of a document that I've ever seen

  • @JenScarbrough
    @JenScarbrough 2 роки тому

    TRUST NO ONE 👀

  • @jamesboaz4787
    @jamesboaz4787 5 років тому +4

    Oh I just realized where this information is coming from.

  • @cathynistico4158
    @cathynistico4158 3 роки тому +1

    Of Oswald is the lone assassin why not release the documents

  • @charlesbennett7688
    @charlesbennett7688 2 роки тому +2

    They knew about it or killed him themself

  • @douglasmcintyre3297
    @douglasmcintyre3297 6 років тому +1

    Not so much destroyed as sanitized I expect. Today is is early December 2018, some 14 months after this video was posted and the Donald has yet to release all of the documents.

  • @alrifr5786
    @alrifr5786 2 роки тому

    The CIA and FBI doesn't believe Oswald was alone assassin because they know they were the assassins.

  • @junepickering4493
    @junepickering4493 4 роки тому +1

    The Mafia was well involved.

  • @CyberValerie
    @CyberValerie 2 роки тому

    The most incriminating documents were destroyed. Not archived. They always are. Would be stupid to archive them.

  • @MobileToA
    @MobileToA 7 років тому +2

    This is why I’m formulating a bill I want everyone to have the link to & share with everyone they’d convince to simply THINK about the importance of preserving hard copies of shit like this & mKing it illegal to tamper. Destroy. EDIT. Bleep. Or blatantly censoring crucial evidence.
    For jfk himself even said that this would bring an uproar BUT ultimately a mutual understanding.
    That saying ‘it’s gotta get worse before it gets better’ it’s only natural that nature is beautiful after a storm. With dirt (power) piling up. It’s inevitable this storms gonna bring beauty.
    It’s time we make our mark on history

  • @anotherjoshua
    @anotherjoshua 7 років тому +2

    if helms denied it, why would it have been expunged?

  • @r.l.strange1897
    @r.l.strange1897 7 років тому +2

    Did the guy in this video have a lobotomy? XD

  • @chrismcguinness1908
    @chrismcguinness1908 6 років тому +2

    In the Paragraph he speaks that Hoover wrote he leaves out the name Mr Katzenbach
    Why? Mr Katzenbach was a united. States attorney!

  • @pub1iuz
    @pub1iuz 2 роки тому

    You are assuming the government clearly believed that Oswald was alone responsible.

  • @SuperKaloyan
    @SuperKaloyan 3 роки тому +1

    Mac Wallace from the window, James Files from the fence.

  • @ivana_333
    @ivana_333 4 роки тому

    CIA and Mossad are responsible!

  • @steveloafe
    @steveloafe Рік тому

    If the document showed that he denied it why not include it?

  • @meo1960
    @meo1960 6 років тому +1

    Luke Eight:Seventeen(NIV)
    For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.

  • @drguffey
    @drguffey 3 роки тому +1

    Time for ALL documents by released unredacted !

    • @mikelldaley9078
      @mikelldaley9078 2 роки тому

      lol like thats gonna happen ?

    • @drguffey
      @drguffey 2 роки тому

      @@mikelldaley9078 It should happen.

  • @richardfinlayson1524
    @richardfinlayson1524 3 роки тому

    I don't think the majority of people think Oswald had anything to do with it

  • @joseaamorosalicea6783
    @joseaamorosalicea6783 Рік тому

    The Washing Post doing what it does best. 0:53

  • @rishitriukha8018
    @rishitriukha8018 5 років тому +1

    its march 2019; were they released yet?

  • @robg71
    @robg71 4 роки тому

    Why didn't Obama release the documents? He was close to Ted Kennedy.

    • @davidwilliams4498
      @davidwilliams4498 Рік тому

      Mafia same with Trump Mafia was clearly part of jfk hit. They don't want to end up like jfk like RFK did by exposing an or going after mafia

  • @stephaniemontor1567
    @stephaniemontor1567 2 роки тому

    It’s not done until it’s properly done. The truth will come out.

  • @burkeherrick3580
    @burkeherrick3580 Рік тому

    The government might think that but thr people think the government did it. The journalist certainly knows what side he is on.

  • @zoologicalmilitia2241
    @zoologicalmilitia2241 7 років тому +1

    BALLISTICS MATTER NO BLOOD SPLATTTER AND NO HUMAN REACTION TO BALLISTIC IMPACTS!

    • @SomeoneHasToSayIt2525
      @SomeoneHasToSayIt2525 5 років тому

      Not to mention ZERO forensic evidence of blood, tissue, bone and/or fabric was found on the MAGIC BULLET that allegedly passed through multiple body parts and several layers of clothing of two (2) large men. SINGLE BULLET THEORY IS THE BIGGEST CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THE JFK COUP D’STAT.

  • @jayseonb7498
    @jayseonb7498 3 роки тому +2

    It’s a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside a enigma. You’ll never figure it out. The shooters don’t even know.

    • @cammontreuil7509
      @cammontreuil7509 3 роки тому

      All done in plain sight and across from a police station and no one knows what happened ? Doesn't seem possible.

  • @johncasciello4123
    @johncasciello4123 3 роки тому +1

    No mention of the bullets and where they came from that is if OSWALD bought them at a gun shop or when at the firing range in the armed services took a few home every now and then? And as time went on the age/wear caught on to a few unfired bullets (everthing oxcidizes over the years especially metals) so it is possible that the first shot was what is called a 'bad round' because of the age of that bullet so it sounded like a FIRECRACKER to most people by JFK,S LIMO! or it is possible that bullet was fired from ONE RIFLE and the other 2 shots (did not sound like a firecracker) fired from a SECOND RIFLE:2 SHOOTER RIFLES? (located from where ever and if there were 2 SHOOTERS on the site-again where ever positioned if this is possible at all on that fateful day-all these scenarios because no one can really say for sure if THEY ACTUALLY COULD IDENTIFY THE MAN UP IN THE WINDOW INSIDE THE TSBD BUILDING) though some say they SAW WHAT APPEARED TO BE A RIFLE PROTRUDING OUT THE WINDOW and what appeared to be a light skinned man possibly holding that rifle-and this type of witness not being ABSOLUTLY SURE OF IDENTIFYING THE SUSPECT will always lead to all this 60 YEARS OF SPECULATION*

  • @julianciahaconsulting8663
    @julianciahaconsulting8663 3 роки тому

    What of the "Hitler in Argentina" FBI document showing up in the 2017 batch of assassination records? Whats with that?

  • @IamEnygma
    @IamEnygma 2 роки тому

    20 hundred records?
    Why not just say two thousand?

  • @ronaldholmes8525
    @ronaldholmes8525 3 роки тому

    EXACTLY! ....Any smoking gun stopped smoking a long time ago.

  • @paulg11552
    @paulg11552 5 років тому

    Ancient Alien theorists said Aliens did it

  • @saskoilersfan
    @saskoilersfan 5 років тому

    Everything associated with this assasination can be found on Disney property... Including Camelot... And Kathleen Kennedy.

  • @WatchTashi
    @WatchTashi 5 років тому

    Why is the WaPo incapable of leaving Trump out of any story, video, etc. that they put out? Seriously, it’s not a good look.

  • @GogglesPaesano
    @GogglesPaesano 6 років тому

    She did the messy headshot .. so obvious

  • @henrywhh
    @henrywhh 4 роки тому

    If the answer to CIA question was NO what would it have been redacted???