He doesnt want the polygraph, but he initially agrees with it just so she will take his case. The fact that he pushed his wife through a plate glass panel (he says he brushed her arm ) psychopath
Not just a wife killer, a time waster too! I cannot believe they will release someone who won't confess and reveal where the body is, bringing closure for the family!
another concern for me, is that Glynn, when talking about DV, specifically putting a woman through a glass sliding door (and then complaining that he had been cut by a shard of glass), still talks of this as though it was nothing and just a movement of his arm moving her out of the way! Also stating that she provoked him by saying he was 'pathetic'. I'm sure a man would accept the same, being beaten for having called someone 'pathetic'. Having such a disgusting attitude to DV after 14 years in prison, shows he hasn't changed at all and would still be a danger to women
Two things that changed my perception from sceptical about his guilt to fairly certain of it. 1- He seemed very deceptive about throwing his wife through a plate glass door. His language made it seem like he was lying and the point that he was acquitted of that particular crime has no actual bearing on whether he was violent towards her on that occasion or not, as he tries to suggest. 2- Why the sudden change on the polygraph? If I were wrongly imprisoned I'd absolutely jump at the chance to take a polygraph and clear my name and no amount of preparation or warning would be needed. It seems to me that only someone who intended on deceiving the test would be worried about being forewarned. His assertion that polygraphs are tantamount to astrology are absolutely incorrect and I'm sure he's aware of that. It's virtually impossible for a regular person to cheat a correctly conducted polygraph. Polygraphs absolutely can't get inside somebody's mind but that can very accurately detect the normal physical reactions to somebody being deceitful and lying. If he's as innocent as he claims then he shouldn't be worried about a "false positive", he should be ready and willing to clear his name.
Polygraphs are junk science. It's why they aren't allowed in court. And phsychopaths are able to pass them. Innocent people fail them. Might as well flip a coin.
I fully disagree with you regarding polygraphs if it were virtually impossible to cheat a polygraph then they would be admissible in court, I personally would never take a polygraph whether innocent or guilty
@@anitagoodman9002 I’m with you on that, I’d never ever take a polygraph test, wether innocent or guilty. You’re putting your case in the hands of somebody’s judgement, based on your physical reactions and people do not react the same. You gain nothing if they deem you telling the truth and you gain nothing but guilty fingers pointing back at you, if you fail.
When he said he was worried about falling the lie test is when I knew he has to be guilty. If you’re not guilty you wouldn’t be afraid of failing the lie detector test . Plus the way he got angry when she said they can do the test unnerved me. I hope he rots in that prison
The ridiculous notion that his wife planted the blood in the car several days later was enough for me; the investigation would end right there! The stuff about interrupting his day, that was priceless; his prison diary full to the end of the year, apparently! 🤣
Not necessarily. You can be innocent, but nervous, and fail that test. That’s why it can’t be used as evidence in a court of law. 😊I think he’s guilty.
It would interrupt his day in prison??? He checked his appointment diary and it was full until the end of the year!!! Hard to believe this guy managed to pull off a murder in broad daylight and then make the body disappear out of thin air, he sounds like he doesn't have two brain cells to rub together. And then that ridiculous theory of his that the blood was planted in the car by his wife several days later; if it were me investigating this case the investigation would end right there, too stupid for words!
Because in prison you get very little free time or time doing the things you might enjoy and you wouldn't want to give up that small amount of time to do something that has no way of helping your case
@@anitagoodman9002 he should’ve just been up front from the beginning and said he’d never do a test, based on the science that seems polygraph as not viable. You can’t look down on a person who sticks to their convictions. You only look at them as untrustworthy when they start to shake and change at the drop of a dime. He looked bad for constant changing.
He sounds like a very manipulative controlling person. Blames wife for being shoved thru a glass panel. arrogant statements that he knows more than police, no way to alibi, change of clothing, driving a car not his as his wife would recognize his vehicle...too many little things. I left my rel after 17 yrs, i made a secret transfer so that i had funds. I never left my children and never would. She does not sound like a mom that would...
Christopher Halliwell said something very revealing in one of his police interviews after he was already in custody. It was something like, I will give you an admission of murder to the second girl if you promise not to come back to bothering me year after year asking if I was responsible for this one or that one or the other one, and the police agreed. How has this evaded the eyes of Inside Justice. It is available on UA-cam.
So how could Halliwell have gotten Linda's blood into Glyn's friend's car? Even if he wanted to go to the trouble of attempting to frame Glyn -- why? -- how would he have known that Glyn would have been using that particular friend's car at that time? I don't understand why the Inside Justice team didn't consider all of this and dismiss Halliwell as being a false trail much more quickly. Unless the friend who owned the car had somehow obtained a sample of Linda's blood, along with a motive to splash it around inside his own car, how could the blood have arrived there apart from Linda's injured body being present there at some point? It's quite possible that the forensic techs missed it on their first two examinations. Sometimes the most mundane explanation is the best one.
The guy should get another life sentences for rank stupidity, his wife planted the blood several days later, he checked his prison diary and taking a polygraph would disrupt his day, he gently pushed through a glass door! What I can't understand is, how a guy who sounds like he doesn't have two brain cells to rub together managed to dispose of the body so efficiently! And shame on the legal system, preparing a wife killer for release who has never confessed, no guilt, no remorse, and never revealed the whereabouts of the body!!!
Great content. He very much forgot he was not running the investigation . None of the results were as he expected and I was surprised, as an ex government employee that it was so easy to mislay articles of evidence. Very poor record keeping. He never came across as an innocent person, probably because he was so entitled. So sad for his wife and her relatives, no where to mourn. Jolly hard work in unpicking the cases. Well done.
I wanted to hear him out but the wife going through a glass door was a red flag. Then he changed his mind on the polygraph test. Then the blood in his trunk. Psychos are very good at pretending to be since. He did it.
It's the way he described her going through the glass door; he gently pushed passed her; anyone who minimise his abuse to that extent is a born liar, minimising all his vile actions, never accepting responsibility for anything. He is a danger to the public, insane to release him, especially as he still won't confess, still won't reveal the whereabouts of the body. So he's been moved to an open prison in preparation for release, that's disgusting, shame on the legal system. Of course, if he had been prosecuted in the past for battery his wife would likely still be alive, so this is another case of the justice system being ultimately responsible for her death, just as it has been for all those women who were murdered by stalkers!
I like Louise, she talks nice and straight forward to the people, and this guy showed us who he really is, just talking, women to him it seems aren't as smart as he, the way he described hitting his wife's face through a glass door, he noted that he got cut also, and it was dismissed in court, the only, to me, obvious reason he won't take the lie detector test is because of what he finally said 'I still have appeals so I, I, I.. Don't want anything to hinder any of that, ' your a psychopath you'll pass it. I feel bad for his kids and the friend who loaned him his car.
Yes, on the one hand, she has a great approach, but on the other, the alarm bells were ringing right from the very start! If I could tell, from the moment he uttered his theory that the blood was planted BY HIS WIFE several days later, that the man was is guilty as hell, surely Louise knew it too; the investigation was a waste of valuable time and resources, which could have been spent on a case where the killer wasn't also a blithering idiot! Shame on the legal system preparing a wife killer for release who still won't confess, still won't reveal the whereabouts of the body!
I feel sorry for Glyn's sister. She so wants to believe in her brother's innocence. I'm not sorry for Glyn at all - he used up valuable time and resources just to maintain his charade.
I'm not sorry for her, why would you? I'm sure she know her brother well. If he was violent with his wife, his sister most likely know it. If she doesn't know, then she's stupid.
I'm no blood spatter analyst, but speaking as an artist, I use ink all of the time coming from a dropper bottle, and those blood spots look exactly like it looks when I drop ink and then drag the dropper, which produces a sperm-like shape (hence the tail). Also if her body was in that boot or trunk, why wasn't the blood pressed down? Why are there droplets? We need Dexter up in here!
Lol yep! What would Dexter do?!? I don't understand how it's only on the trunk hood... gravity would have produced more on the bottom of the trunk than the top, right? Also, just because the spatter looks legit doesn't mean much, if assuming it's planted professionally. If police decided to go so far as planting evidence, they'd better make it believable! (research & practice first) Police would be one of the best from prior blood evidence cases. He seems guilty. I wish they would have given him another chance at doing the lie detector (he sounded like he was willing when they spoke after backing out) so they could say they had more solid evidence showing his guilt.
The up-side of him doing it and him passing is that it may alleviate some of the doubts that people may still have that are trying to help Glyn. Now I would just drop him for not wanting to do it, because he knows it will be negative. He did it.
What an excellent programme. I must say that for a while I thought his innocence was probable, but as the investigation continued, the expert opinions and the conversations with the man himself had me swaying in the other direction .For me the nonsense in refusing the polygraph counted against him even before the blood evidence was examined . I am not convinced the polygraph is irrefutable evidence , even so I believe an innocent person would not be as determinedly resistant.Another entirely emotional response , I didn’t actually like him or trust in his integrity.
Yes, Linda agree, too smooth a talker, when it came to action, up went the excuses: *FACT*: He stopped paying maintenance to the children just weeks before her murder, she took that to court, and the law froze his bank account: then later she disappeared. I did not like him also: l noticed rage in his demeanour from his photo:
How do you "gently" move someone aside and they somehow go through a glass door AND you cut your hand? I have never heard such nonsense. And how does being called pathetic make any difference? It makes a difference to HIM, that's why. I doubt he meticulously planned this. I think something set him off and he went to confront her, he probably didn't plan to kill her, and he got lucky by not getting caught by a witness that morning.
I doubt the blood evidence - there are numerous cases worldwide in regards to fraudulent or sloppy lab work on forensic samples. For one example, look up 'Queensland forensic inquiry' with regards to DNA forensic testing. Queensland, Australia.
This 2 parter blew my mind. At first i thought ok, maybe some shady sh*t went on but then this video made it pretty clear. My whole indecisive nature was built on that his prison term was to end in a year....why would he still be fighting if he alrdy served the time. I thought cause he felt he had to prove himself so he could go on. But maybe it was something else....
The grieving mother made up LIES about Halliwell because he got off on his daughters murder, Glen is guilty as hell, an innocent man would jump at a polygraph, yet he was rattled.
The grieving mother made up LIES about Halliwell because he got off on his daughters murder, Glen is guilty as hell, an innocent man would jump at a polygraph, yet he was rattled. Mother... His daughter? If you had actually watched the program properly you would have noticed that he was convicted of "her daughters" murder. He is a double murderer and one of his victims was "her" daughter. You do not seem very intelligent to me to be coming to conclusions and posting on these programs.
In these investigations, I always hope the person can be found innocent, but from pretty early on, I didn't believe him. I think he is guilty and quite capable of doing it.
oh now he is claiming that if a serial killer killed her that she "must have willingly donated a syringeful of blood and had it planted" if that was the case (?????????????????)
I don't think the hooverings mattered, because Glynn had an answer both ways. He claimed blood could still have been planted even though he was the only one with the car!
Inside Justice is similar to America's Innocents Project, etc., which include various believers, retired or successful defense attorneys, investigators... It initially seemed Inside Justice would exonerate Rozzell, but their investigation, his own words, history, actions, attitudes, narcissism... reaffirmed his guilt. He is not cooperative with these people who have set out to prove him innocent. He doesn't even present his own history of analysis of the case that sets out why & how he didn't harm his wife. He dismisses his prior bad questionable behavior, prior assault & conviction for smashing his wife through a glass door & plays the victim. He should be honest w/ his family & stop hurting them, especially stop hurting his children. His lack of remorse & sense of entitlement demonstrates he should not be paroled & he has selfishly wasted energy, time & funds that could have gone for other worthy causes. PS. British police & investigators were marvelous, cooperating & providing IJ access to their investigation, opinions, interviews & potential ODDI (Other Dude Did It) alternative scenario.
Well if I was told the same police I fear planted evidence that convicted me was not allowing testing on possible evidence that could prove my innocence on the day of,much less right before , I was taking a lie detector test knowing that me failing would be as easy as be being highly sens6itive and nervous
He has everything to lose. He was trying to get released. I haven't seen the rest of the video, but I believe he is guilty. No way, this woman would have left her 4 kids and family with no contact. He also has a history of murders. Come one now. Look at the DNA. The blood has told the story. He won't because he has a lot more to lose and doesn't want to be exposed as a serial killer and liar who has wasted so much of that country's financial resources. He is a typical, pathological liar and his tears are genuine because he is such a practiced liar.
He was denied release because he wouldn't tell them where his wife's body is. If he's innocent he has no way of knowing where the body is hidden,so he's screwed. He's not a likable guy,too controlling for my taste,but that doesn't make him a murderer. Maybe Halliwell did drive down that alley way and picked her up because she was running late.Blood evidence could've easily planted by the cops and why won't they let the hoover evidence get tested? There is a lot of reasonable doubt here.
How would the cops get her blood to plant as evidence in the car? They've never found her body and I don't think they have everyones blood just sitting around on the off chance that they might need it someday to frame someone. If it was his car he might be able to explain the blood away as being there already since she most likely used his car at some point but the fact that he had his friends car is a lot harder to explain away.
I don’t know if id take the polygraph, if you look into the research they depend heavily on the interpretation of results so if the examiner doesn’t like you he could say ypure lying
Wait….what is this chick up to? He was not super agitated when he asked about the polygraph. His asking for notice was reasonable and most people(a crime reporter??) are aware that the polygraph is inadmissible and does not detect “lies”. The music playing during the call was intentionally creepy and pregnant with suspicion. Ok…did I get fished into some BS?
Refusing polygraph after 14 years..... I call BS. I'd drop him. Let him stay in prison. This couldn't have hurt his appeal. Polygraphs aren't allowed in court. He's a l**r and m**derer..... IMHO
If this serial killer has a certain place to bury his victims....then it's probably known to all in area & surrounding. Or whoever watches the news & true crime. So who's to say a man couldn't put items, if not a victim in same area....making look to be another's/conv killers fault? Or something in that line?
Why didn't Police seize the vehicle from the outset it allowed contamination of the vehicle, in particular the boot and why wasn't there a full examination of the alleged friend who lent him the vehicle. There are too many flaws in the case and a decent defence counsel would have picked it up. And whether he is guilty of the offence is not the point on the balance of probabilities he would have been found not guilty. The vehicle was subject to contamination once it left the custody of police also there is no dating of the blood which was found in the vehicle. It could suggest the alleged friend or another was involved. Poor policing.
Ok, part one I thought Christopher Halliwell murdered Linda. (possibly Glyn? ). The blood (not planted) in the boot of the car (and why not the polygraph test? ) , I believe Glyn killed Linda.
I bet it was the same lady that claimed her 3 year old was walking on the wall and came across him. I bet it's Glynn's sister trying to make it look like its the serial killer, not her brother
16:30 - "My daughter was three years old...I think" - if she can't remember how old her daughter was then how credible is her witness testimony? What a load of bollocks.
I know that polygraphs aren't always accurate and we may still have to give the benefit of the doubt about his weariness of taking it. It lives in a constant stressful environment in prison. It leaves you on constant edge and uneasy in such a violent place. I never have been there, thank God, but I have been in abusive situations I could not get out of and at an early age. I learned to be tense as a norm. Glyn may be very aware that he is not a relaxed person anymore. He had been in prison for 14 years. How would you be? Do you think you could pass a polygraph under such circumstances without a head-ups. He needs time to decompress and calm himself. He needs not to let anything rattle him that day in hopes to get a positive result on the polygraph. I don't trust the things. I would never allow them. As for Glyn, I am undecided about his innocents. It is possible this cereal killer did it, especially if he knew her and if he had been watching them, but it is highly unlikely.
You don't understand how polygraph works. The gentleman who was about to perform the trst explains it in the documentary. Anxiety created by stress because people are afraid of it, and anxiety created by being deceiving are two different things. Body has different reactions to eac, and polygraph can distinguish between the two. Glynn is a psychopath and very smart. He knows it and that's the reason he declined the test. He's guilty as hell.
@@natalianakoriakova8084 I don't trust scientist opinions in this matter on how it works. Too many false results proven in the past and thank God they are not allowed in the courts. I would never submit to them.
@zarahofshiloh7537 exactly how many? Give me a link to the official information on "how many" or keep quiet. There are false tests everywhere you go: false x-Rays, mammograms, blood and urine tests and so on. But unless you're a complete idiot, you're doing it. And you know what, when you get behind the wheel, no one guarantees you, you're gonna get alive from point A to point B. This moron is guilty as hell hence the reason he didn't go through polygraph. Period.
This Linda Woman is missing, there is No Body, and the Husband is protesting his innocence. Who's to say that this Linda Woman didn't plant the Blood to incriminate him, and ran off with her Fancy Man?
Information, memory and eye witnesses are truly fascinating. As humans there are so many elements to motivation. What people knew, what people say in order to be 'seen' to be helping to be the 'one' special person that links his/her connection to a crime that has notoriety as it is in the public space. So far I've seen in this documentary nothing substantial, not a single incident could be substantiated and his experience to being told the lie detector text is coming up also to me demonstrates a lack of real sincerity. I do believe that lie detector tests in the media can make a person seem guilty, but the again if they are found not guilty as through a lie detector they will scream their innocence from the rooftops. The bloke to me seems from the case guilty as was found in the trial. I'm writing this before I knew what happened with the lie detector result. He is guilty and there is a weak case that the lie detector case has proven his ambiguity because he never actually thought a lie detector case experience would fail. The bloke is scared that all his work to be proven innocent is a scam to bring about nothing other than his fear of being 'proven' guilty. He is a murderer and he can't accept that he got caught.
He doesn’t want his day interrupted by a polygraph? He’s rotting in prison 😂
Polygraph tests cannot detect lies, they are complete pseudo science. Why would you voluntarily take a fake test which may show a false positive?
He doesnt want the polygraph, but he initially agrees with it just so she will take his case. The fact that he pushed his wife through a plate glass panel (he says he brushed her arm ) psychopath
Not just a wife killer, a time waster too! I cannot believe they will release someone who won't confess and reveal where the body is, bringing closure for the family!
another concern for me, is that Glynn, when talking about DV, specifically putting a woman through a glass sliding door (and then complaining that he had been cut by a shard of glass), still talks of this as though it was nothing and just a movement of his arm moving her out of the way! Also stating that she provoked him by saying he was 'pathetic'. I'm sure a man would accept the same, being beaten for having called someone 'pathetic'. Having such a disgusting attitude to DV after 14 years in prison, shows he hasn't changed at all and would still be a danger to women
He's guilty, that's why the police haven't reopened the case.
Two things that changed my perception from sceptical about his guilt to fairly certain of it.
1- He seemed very deceptive about throwing his wife through a plate glass door. His language made it seem like he was lying and the point that he was acquitted of that particular crime has no actual bearing on whether he was violent towards her on that occasion or not, as he tries to suggest.
2- Why the sudden change on the polygraph? If I were wrongly imprisoned I'd absolutely jump at the chance to take a polygraph and clear my name and no amount of preparation or warning would be needed. It seems to me that only someone who intended on deceiving the test would be worried about being forewarned. His assertion that polygraphs are tantamount to astrology are absolutely incorrect and I'm sure he's aware of that. It's virtually impossible for a regular person to cheat a correctly conducted polygraph. Polygraphs absolutely can't get inside somebody's mind but that can very accurately detect the normal physical reactions to somebody being deceitful and lying. If he's as innocent as he claims then he shouldn't be worried about a "false positive", he should be ready and willing to clear his name.
Polygraphs are junk science. It's why they aren't allowed in court. And phsychopaths are able to pass them. Innocent people fail them. Might as well flip a coin.
Polygraphs also give false positives on lying. They're not reliable, which is why they're not permissible as evidence in the US and Canada.
I fully disagree with you regarding polygraphs if it were virtually impossible to cheat a polygraph then they would be admissible in court, I personally would never take a polygraph whether innocent or guilty
He wants to clear his name for some financial gain. But he looks Guilty as fuck
@@anitagoodman9002 I’m with you on that, I’d never ever take a polygraph test, wether innocent or guilty. You’re putting your case in the hands of somebody’s judgement, based on your physical reactions and people do not react the same. You gain nothing if they deem you telling the truth and you gain nothing but guilty fingers pointing back at you, if you fail.
What I think strange is when he was asked why he wanted to do this he stated he'd had enough of prison, not that he wanted to clear his name.
I don't find that strange at all.
He's had 14 years to think about all this and he ends up saying some of the dumbest things I have heard any convicted killer say!
I think she noticed too because she paused when he said that
Good point!
When he said he was worried about falling the lie test is when I knew he has to be guilty. If you’re not guilty you wouldn’t be afraid of failing the lie detector test . Plus the way he got angry when she said they can do the test unnerved me. I hope he rots in that prison
The ridiculous notion that his wife planted the blood in the car several days later was enough for me; the investigation would end right there! The stuff about interrupting his day, that was priceless; his prison diary full to the end of the year, apparently! 🤣
Not necessarily. You can be innocent, but nervous, and fail that test. That’s why it can’t be used as evidence in a court of law. 😊I think he’s guilty.
@@pjay951 Sounds like you have something to hide too!
@@pjay951 Your point applies in some cases but certainly not in this one, so making it here only confuses the issue!
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Why ask for advance notice of the polygraph? Why is he concerned about interrupting his day when he is in prison?
It would interrupt his day in prison??? He checked his appointment diary and it was full until the end of the year!!!
Hard to believe this guy managed to pull off a murder in broad daylight and then make the body disappear out of thin air, he sounds like he doesn't have two brain cells to rub together. And then that ridiculous theory of his that the blood was planted in the car by his wife several days later; if it were me investigating this case the investigation would end right there, too stupid for words!
Because in prison you get very little free time or time doing the things you might enjoy and you wouldn't want to give up that small amount of time to do something that has no way of helping your case
@@anitagoodman9002 he should’ve just been up front from the beginning and said he’d never do a test, based on the science that seems polygraph as not viable. You can’t look down on a person who sticks to their convictions. You only look at them as untrustworthy when they start to shake and change at the drop of a dime. He looked bad for constant changing.
He sounds like a very manipulative controlling person. Blames wife for being shoved thru a glass panel. arrogant statements that he knows more than police, no way to alibi, change of clothing, driving a car not his as his wife would recognize his vehicle...too many little things. I left my rel after 17 yrs, i made a secret transfer so that i had funds. I never left my children and never would. She does not sound like a mom that would...
Sadly, he's manipulated this group.
Christopher Halliwell said something very revealing in one of his police interviews after he was already in custody. It was something like, I will give you an admission of murder to the second girl if you promise not to come back to bothering me year after year asking if I was responsible for this one or that one or the other one, and the police agreed. How has this evaded the eyes of Inside Justice. It is available on UA-cam.
So how could Halliwell have gotten Linda's blood into Glyn's friend's car? Even if he wanted to go to the trouble of attempting to frame Glyn -- why? -- how would he have known that Glyn would have been using that particular friend's car at that time? I don't understand why the Inside Justice team didn't consider all of this and dismiss Halliwell as being a false trail much more quickly.
Unless the friend who owned the car had somehow obtained a sample of Linda's blood, along with a motive to splash it around inside his own car, how could the blood have arrived there apart from Linda's injured body being present there at some point? It's quite possible that the forensic techs missed it on their first two examinations. Sometimes the most mundane explanation is the best one.
The guy should get another life sentences for rank stupidity, his wife planted the blood several days later, he checked his prison diary and taking a polygraph would disrupt his day, he gently pushed through a glass door! What I can't understand is, how a guy who sounds like he doesn't have two brain cells to rub together managed to dispose of the body so efficiently!
And shame on the legal system, preparing a wife killer for release who has never confessed, no guilt, no remorse, and never revealed the whereabouts of the body!!!
Great content. He very much forgot he was not running the investigation . None of the results were as he expected and I was surprised, as an ex government employee that it was so easy to mislay articles of evidence. Very poor record keeping. He never came across as an innocent person, probably because he was so entitled. So sad for his wife and her relatives, no where to mourn. Jolly hard work in unpicking the cases. Well done.
I wanted to hear him out but the wife going through a glass door was a red flag. Then he changed his mind on the polygraph test. Then the blood in his trunk. Psychos are very good at pretending to be since. He did it.
It's the way he described her going through the glass door; he gently pushed passed her; anyone who minimise his abuse to that extent is a born liar, minimising all his vile actions, never accepting responsibility for anything. He is a danger to the public, insane to release him, especially as he still won't confess, still won't reveal the whereabouts of the body. So he's been moved to an open prison in preparation for release, that's disgusting, shame on the legal system. Of course, if he had been prosecuted in the past for battery his wife would likely still be alive, so this is another case of the justice system being ultimately responsible for her death, just as it has been for all those women who were murdered by stalkers!
To be "since"?
To be nice?
Great content as usual. Been a huge fan of this series. Thank you for sharing this particular story.
a man was sitting on a wall so it was the serial killer who was supposed to be always there drawing her, but he had nothing with him. absurd
Brilliant work, now his kids can get even more answers, when they get older!
He has such a busy day that he might be annoyed to be interrupted for a polygraph...😂
Couldn’t her body been in the boot before the second or final examination? The car was not in his possession after the first examination.
I like Louise, she talks nice and straight forward to the people, and this guy showed us who he really is, just talking, women to him it seems aren't as smart as he, the way he described hitting his wife's face through a glass door, he noted that he got cut also, and it was dismissed in court, the only, to me, obvious reason he won't take the lie detector test is because of what he finally said 'I still have appeals so I, I, I.. Don't want anything to hinder any of that, ' your a psychopath you'll pass it. I feel bad for his kids and the friend who loaned him his car.
Yes, on the one hand, she has a great approach, but on the other, the alarm bells were ringing right from the very start! If I could tell, from the moment he uttered his theory that the blood was planted BY HIS WIFE several days later, that the man was is guilty as hell, surely Louise knew it too; the investigation was a waste of valuable time and resources, which could have been spent on a case where the killer wasn't also a blithering idiot!
Shame on the legal system preparing a wife killer for release who still won't confess, still won't reveal the whereabouts of the body!
I feel sorry for Glyn's sister. She so wants to believe in her brother's innocence. I'm not sorry for Glyn at all - he used up valuable time and resources just to maintain his charade.
I'm not sorry for her, why would you? I'm sure she know her brother well. If he was violent with his wife, his sister most likely know it. If she doesn't know, then she's stupid.
If they say that police tampered with blood found in the boot, then from where did they get that blood of a person who is missing.
I'm no blood spatter analyst, but speaking as an artist, I use ink all of the time coming from a dropper bottle, and those blood spots look exactly like it looks when I drop ink and then drag the dropper, which produces a sperm-like shape (hence the tail). Also if her body was in that boot or trunk, why wasn't the blood pressed down? Why are there droplets? We need Dexter up in here!
Lol yep! What would Dexter do?!?
I don't understand how it's only on the trunk hood... gravity would have produced more on the bottom of the trunk than the top, right?
Also, just because the spatter looks legit doesn't mean much, if assuming it's planted professionally. If police decided to go so far as planting evidence, they'd better make it believable! (research & practice first) Police would be one of the best from prior blood evidence cases.
He seems guilty. I wish they would have given him another chance at doing the lie detector (he sounded like he was willing when they spoke after backing out) so they could say they had more solid evidence showing his guilt.
Steve Fulcher is a great man.
The up-side of him doing it and him passing is that it may alleviate some of the doubts that people may still have that are trying to help Glyn. Now I would just drop him for not wanting to do it, because he knows it will be negative. He did it.
Extremely Interesting ✔️
Glad you enjoyed it
@@AbsoluteCrime I sure did✔️
What an excellent programme. I must say that for a while I thought his innocence was probable, but as the investigation continued, the expert opinions and the conversations with the man himself had me swaying in the other direction .For me the nonsense in refusing the polygraph counted against him even before the blood evidence was examined . I am not convinced the polygraph is irrefutable evidence , even so I believe an innocent person would not be as determinedly resistant.Another entirely emotional response , I didn’t actually like him or trust in his integrity.
Yes, Linda agree, too smooth a talker, when it came to action, up went the excuses:
*FACT*:
He stopped paying maintenance to the children just weeks before her murder, she took that to court, and the law froze his bank account: then later she disappeared. I did not like him also: l noticed rage in his demeanour from his photo:
Wish was more episodes x
How do you "gently" move someone aside and they somehow go through a glass door AND you cut your hand? I have never heard such nonsense. And how does being called pathetic make any difference? It makes a difference to HIM, that's why.
I doubt he meticulously planned this. I think something set him off and he went to confront her, he probably didn't plan to kill her, and he got lucky by not getting caught by a witness that morning.
16 years for murder?
they found her blood in the car he was using LOL
I doubt the blood evidence - there are numerous cases worldwide in regards to fraudulent or sloppy lab work on forensic samples. For one example, look up 'Queensland forensic inquiry' with regards to DNA forensic testing. Queensland, Australia.
I think, seriously, the police were just slack and missed the blood. He did it
This 2 parter blew my mind. At first i thought ok, maybe some shady sh*t went on but then this video made it pretty clear. My whole indecisive nature was built on that his prison term was to end in a year....why would he still be fighting if he alrdy served the time. I thought cause he felt he had to prove himself so he could go on. But maybe it was something else....
Good grief.Another room full of report writers who have solved nothing.
That’s what the comment section is for. Loosen up there buddy.
one minute shes having an affair with him, then she's being stalked by him and said he is a "pest"
The grieving mother made up LIES about Halliwell because he got off on his daughters murder, Glen is guilty as hell, an innocent man would jump at a polygraph, yet he was rattled.
The grieving mother made up LIES about Halliwell because he got off on his daughters murder, Glen is guilty as hell, an innocent man would jump at a polygraph, yet he was rattled. Mother... His daughter? If you had actually watched the program properly you would have noticed that he was convicted of "her daughters" murder. He is a double murderer and one of his victims was "her" daughter. You do not seem very intelligent to me to be coming to conclusions and posting on these programs.
Polygraphs are so unreliable that their use as evidence is not permissible in court in both the US and Canada.
In these investigations, I always hope the person can be found innocent, but from pretty early on, I didn't believe him. I think he is guilty and quite capable of doing it.
oh now he is claiming that if a serial killer killed her that she "must have willingly donated a syringeful of blood and had it planted" if that was the case (?????????????????)
I don't think the hooverings mattered, because Glynn had an answer both ways. He claimed blood could still have been planted even though he was the only one with the car!
Beyond belief that the serial killer, Haliwell,would keep a sample of Linda's blood and have access to the car to plant blood splatter in the boot.
He’s guilty.
Inside Justice is similar to America's Innocents Project, etc., which include various believers, retired or successful defense attorneys, investigators... It initially seemed Inside Justice would exonerate Rozzell, but their investigation, his own words, history, actions, attitudes, narcissism... reaffirmed his guilt.
He is not cooperative with these people who have set out to prove him innocent. He doesn't even present his own history of analysis of the case that sets out why & how he didn't harm his wife. He dismisses his prior bad questionable behavior, prior assault & conviction for smashing his wife through a glass door & plays the victim. He should be honest w/ his family & stop hurting them, especially stop hurting his children. His lack of remorse & sense of entitlement demonstrates he should not be paroled & he has selfishly wasted energy, time & funds that could have gone for other worthy causes.
PS. British police & investigators were marvelous, cooperating & providing IJ access to their investigation, opinions, interviews & potential ODDI (Other Dude Did It) alternative scenario.
Absolutely zero potential MENSA candidates were featured in this video.
Well if I was told the same police I fear planted evidence that convicted me was not allowing testing on possible evidence that could prove my innocence on the day of,much less right before , I was taking a lie detector test knowing that me failing would be as easy as be being highly sens6itive and nervous
Lie detector test is not full proof but he has nothing to lose
He has everything to lose. He was trying to get released. I haven't seen the rest of the video, but I believe he is guilty. No way, this woman would have left her 4 kids and family with no contact. He also has a history of murders. Come one now. Look at the DNA. The blood has told the story. He won't because he has a lot more to lose and doesn't want to be exposed as a serial killer and liar who has wasted so much of that country's financial resources. He is a typical, pathological liar and his tears are genuine because he is such a practiced liar.
If I was innocent I would do anything to prove it, including a polygraph without notice
He was denied release because he wouldn't tell them where his wife's body is. If he's innocent he has no way of knowing where the body is hidden,so he's screwed. He's not a likable guy,too controlling for my taste,but that doesn't make him a murderer. Maybe Halliwell did drive down that alley way and picked her up because she was running late.Blood evidence could've easily planted by the cops and why won't they let the hoover evidence get tested? There is a lot of reasonable doubt here.
How would the cops get her blood to plant as evidence in the car? They've never found her body and I don't think they have everyones blood just sitting around on the off chance that they might need it someday to frame someone. If it was his car he might be able to explain the blood away as being there already since she most likely used his car at some point but the fact that he had his friends car is a lot harder to explain away.
I don’t know if id take the polygraph, if you look into the research they depend heavily on the interpretation of results so if the examiner doesn’t like you he could say ypure lying
why would it matter if Linda and Halliwell knew each other anyway? doesn't mean he killed her
*"Polygraph expert"! LOL!*
*It's like saying the tarot reading expert...*
🙄🤦🤦♂🤦♀
Wait….what is this chick up to? He was not super agitated when he asked about the polygraph. His asking for notice was reasonable and most people(a crime reporter??) are aware that the polygraph is inadmissible and does not detect “lies”. The music playing during the call was intentionally creepy and pregnant with suspicion. Ok…did I get fished into some BS?
Chick? wow
Refusing polygraph after 14 years..... I call BS. I'd drop him. Let him stay in prison. This couldn't have hurt his appeal. Polygraphs aren't allowed in court. He's a l**r and m**derer..... IMHO
This was the second I saw in this series. I hope that other episodes are not about trying to help woman beaters or cheating husbands...
If this serial killer has a certain place to bury his victims....then it's probably known to all in area & surrounding. Or whoever watches the news & true crime. So who's to say a man couldn't put items, if not a victim in same area....making look to be another's/conv killers fault? Or something in that line?
Why didn't Police seize the vehicle from the outset it allowed contamination of the vehicle, in particular the boot and why wasn't there a full examination of the alleged friend who lent him the vehicle. There are too many flaws in the case and a decent defence counsel would have picked it up. And whether he is guilty of the offence is not the point on the balance of probabilities he would have been found not guilty. The vehicle was subject to contamination once it left the custody of police also there is no dating of the blood which was found in the vehicle. It could suggest the alleged friend or another was involved. Poor policing.
Ok, part one I thought Christopher Halliwell murdered Linda. (possibly Glyn? ). The blood (not planted) in the boot of the car (and why not the polygraph test? ) , I believe Glyn killed Linda.
Boring story with no ending
I bet it was the same lady that claimed her 3 year old was walking on the wall and came across him. I bet it's Glynn's sister trying to make it look like its the serial killer, not her brother
It ounces fer sli
Same old video.
Whose blood does it belong to linda ?? Basic analysis you would think !!
16:30 - "My daughter was three years old...I think" - if she can't remember how old her daughter was then how credible is her witness testimony? What a load of bollocks.
I know that polygraphs aren't always accurate and we may still have to give the benefit of the doubt about his weariness of taking it. It lives in a constant stressful environment in prison. It leaves you on constant edge and uneasy in such a violent place. I never have been there, thank God, but I have been in abusive situations I could not get out of and at an early age. I learned to be tense as a norm. Glyn may be very aware that he is not a relaxed person anymore. He had been in prison for 14 years. How would you be? Do you think you could pass a polygraph under such circumstances without a head-ups. He needs time to decompress and calm himself. He needs not to let anything rattle him that day in hopes to get a positive result on the polygraph. I don't trust the things. I would never allow them. As for Glyn, I am undecided about his innocents. It is possible this cereal killer did it, especially if he knew her and if he had been watching them, but it is highly unlikely.
You don't understand how polygraph works. The gentleman who was about to perform the trst explains it in the documentary. Anxiety created by stress because people are afraid of it, and anxiety created by being deceiving are two different things. Body has different reactions to eac, and polygraph can distinguish between the two. Glynn is a psychopath and very smart. He knows it and that's the reason he declined the test. He's guilty as hell.
@@natalianakoriakova8084 I don't trust scientist opinions in this matter on how it works. Too many false results proven in the past and thank God they are not allowed in the courts. I would never submit to them.
@zarahofshiloh7537 exactly how many? Give me a link to the official information on "how many" or keep quiet. There are false tests everywhere you go: false x-Rays, mammograms, blood and urine tests and so on. But unless you're a complete idiot, you're doing it. And you know what, when you get behind the wheel, no one guarantees you, you're gonna get alive from point A to point B. This moron is guilty as hell hence the reason he didn't go through polygraph. Period.
@@natalianakoriakova8084 "Polygraphs" are utter pseudo-scientific crap.
Is you don't get that, that's sad for you.
Do you believe in fairies too?
@@natalianakoriakova8084 Go finish you tarot reading and give us a break, fool!
i hope there is no Episode 3, had enough of this crap
BOARING....
You shouldn’t refer to yourself in a negative way.
Hahahaha,brilliant retort
Use spell-check
What does that even mean? Is that like a pig doing pig stuff or what?
🐷Boar ing？
This Linda Woman is missing, there is No Body, and the Husband is protesting his innocence.
Who's to say that this Linda Woman didn't plant the Blood to incriminate him, and ran off with her Fancy Man?
Information, memory and eye witnesses are truly fascinating. As humans there are so many elements to motivation. What people knew, what people say in order to be 'seen' to be helping to be the 'one' special person that links his/her connection to a crime that has notoriety as it is in the public space. So far I've seen in this documentary nothing substantial, not a single incident could be substantiated and his experience to being told the lie detector text is coming up also to me demonstrates a lack of real sincerity. I do believe that lie detector tests in the media can make a person seem guilty, but the again if they are found not guilty as through a lie detector they will scream their innocence from the rooftops. The bloke to me seems from the case guilty as was found in the trial. I'm writing this before I knew what happened with the lie detector result. He is guilty and there is a weak case that the lie detector case has proven his ambiguity because he never actually thought a lie detector case experience would fail. The bloke is scared that all his work to be proven innocent is a scam to bring about nothing other than his fear of being 'proven' guilty. He is a murderer and he can't accept that he got caught.