China's 7nm Semiconductor Breakthrough

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @Gemarica
    @Gemarica Рік тому +1427

    Like the CEO of ASML, Peter Wennink said when reacting to American pressure on China : “The rules of physics are the same in China as they are in the US or the Netherlands”.

    • @santhoshsridhar5887
      @santhoshsridhar5887 Рік тому +97

      The rules of physics are same enough that China probably won't be able to go further than 7N without EUV without it being extremely ineffective cost wise.

    • @Wasengenyie
      @Wasengenyie Рік тому +173

      @@santhoshsridhar5887 It really does not matter

    • @dan-bz7dz
      @dan-bz7dz Рік тому +337

      @@santhoshsridhar5887 And when they do, you'l say the exact same thing for the newer version

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 Рік тому +306

      @@santhoshsridhar5887 next year when SMIC breaks 5nm, you'll come back and say that's their limit and back again @ 3nm.. etc etc technology isn't exclusive, some may hold patents for some but never all.... there're always many routes from A-B

    • @humpydumpy2432
      @humpydumpy2432 Рік тому +88

      ​​@@santhoshsridhar5887who know china already has EUV prototype

  • @hai-duynguyen8429
    @hai-duynguyen8429 Рік тому +457

    Man.. I remember find this channel back in 2020 when it had 15K subscribers. How far you’ve come along.

    • @Loseinpoker
      @Loseinpoker Рік тому +8

      Same ! I think he had like a few thousand only

    • @DavidTrejo
      @DavidTrejo Рік тому +11

      Yeah the channel blew up once they went to the 8nm process 😎

    • @j562gee0hdeewestsdegethemuLa
      @j562gee0hdeewestsdegethemuLa Рік тому +3

      Ya when I caught on was around 200k ish he doubled up in like a year or so

    • @mna7308
      @mna7308 Рік тому +1

      When the mainstream media constantly spout fake news , these types of platforms grow further

    • @daniel_960_
      @daniel_960_ Рік тому +7

      When I found the channel it made absolutely no sense. The discrepancy between subs and quality. Few thousand subs and the best content on diverse subjects.
      I have a talent for finding great channels early that later blow up. Unlucky I can't invest in them lol.

  • @kennyyodune1727
    @kennyyodune1727 Рік тому +65

    I just noticed you referenced Jordan Schneider. Wasn't this the clown that's currently being trolled about how China's chip industry is totally dead a year or so ago? He also works in an industry that has an agenda and axe to grind. Not sure I'd be listening to what he had to say.

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 Рік тому +34

      I hope Asianometry guy isn't a closet-Falungong supporter.

    • @kennyyodune1727
      @kennyyodune1727 Рік тому +2

      @@peekaboopeekaboo1165 I doubt it at the moment but he should at least perform some background checks. Schneider is clearly biased and almost all his content is ridiculing China and anything they do. If he's not ridiculing, he's attacking. A large amount of his work background revolves around attacking China. In that tweet people are now trolling him with, he was damn near giddy with happiness with how the West is attempting to hobble China's personal development. This is not the actions of someone who is on the level.

    • @mod4rchive
      @mod4rchive Рік тому +1

      @@peekaboopeekaboo1165 I dont think so. He just follows western media which is mostly anti-China because of US which props falun gong stuff and it shows

    • @UnChannelDuVulpineX
      @UnChannelDuVulpineX Рік тому

      @@peekaboopeekaboo1165 OK, wumao.

    • @Luvurenemy
      @Luvurenemy Рік тому

      Who would you listen to?

  • @tommy2cents492
    @tommy2cents492 Рік тому +71

    The drive for EUV was based on economics: with multiple patterning you can make the same chips but at a higher cost.

    • @TheSolidsnake2001
      @TheSolidsnake2001 Рік тому +7

      Qualcomm 8 gen 2 made of 5nm tech is said to be $160 and Kirin 9000s 7nm tech is using this 'higher cost' say it's +50% more than 8Gen2. So, the Kirin phone will be $80 more and most consumer especially the Chinese will have no problem paying $1080 for a $1000 Huawei phone and now it's a "satellite communication device".

    • @zenlei8258
      @zenlei8258 Рік тому

      @@TheSolidsnake2001
      This Huawei Mate Pro 60 have satellite communication mode by installing an subscription App. So you can get internet service in remote areas which is not reached by mobile network.

  • @alexlo7708
    @alexlo7708 Рік тому +269

    Korea is different from China. Korea gets the US's back up in winning against Japan semiconductor industry.
    American has feud on Japan's consumer electronics overwhelmed its market , so it struck back Japan by assisting Korea.

    • @delavan9141
      @delavan9141 Рік тому +12

      LOL.

    • @eltonho09
      @eltonho09 Рік тому +54

      You are right.

    • @সুমন্তনাগ
      @সুমন্তনাগ Рік тому +6

      Right

    • @Peizxcv
      @Peizxcv Рік тому +100

      The US have been playing Japan vs Korea, Taiwan, the Netherlands against each other for the last 40 years. Japanese semiconductor industry is pretty behind the leaders now but the US picked Japan to collaborate on next generation semiconductor instead of Korea and Taiwan

    • @jeffhicks8428
      @jeffhicks8428 Рік тому

      oh it's even worse. The US forced it's Japanese vassal to assist in industrializing Japan's own rival, Korea. And Japan does as it's told, like a good boy. Who's your daddy Japan? That's right. Daddy USA.
      What's more it's the US that mandated Japan's economy get stuck at 5T and stagnate for over a decade. it's only now that we have decided to let Japan become our antiChina counter balance that we agreed to let Japan reverse a bit of what was done with the plaza accords and grow beyond 5T. Anything bigger than 5T makes USA nervous.

  • @keitatsutsumi
    @keitatsutsumi Рік тому +367

    This video made me re-watch the "can you do 7nm without euv?" video you posted an year ago. It speaks to your in-depthness regarding semiconductors, and i can't overstate how much i respect your hard work and dedication. thank you.
    Edit: hey jon. Sorry for this stupid ass argument in the replies to this comment. I have no idea how it started.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Рік тому +9

      no, all he said is NS

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX Рік тому +28

      @@xinyiquan666he is heavily biased since he is taiwanese dpp supporter but he has some points

    • @johndoh5182
      @johndoh5182 Рік тому +28

      There IS no good way to get to the transistor density of the likes of Samsung 7N, Intel 7, or TSMC N7 without EUV. There are only unprofitable ways. This is still the case. SMIC has been able to make something they SAY is equivalent (once again these are names) to the other companies' products they attach a "7" to and they have similar transistor densities, with their LOW DENSITY library, which is also important to understand and he didn't cover I don't think.
      There are different types of transistors that can be produced, and you can have the same transistor be in a low density and high density library. The name of the libraries should be self explanatory. If you clock something above a certain speed then the transistor would most likely come from the low density library and clocking something slow means it can be in a high density library. This is all part of the specs of a process node.
      It is almost certainly the case that SMIC can make something about the same as the other companies' low density library set for what they call their 7nm node, but they would have to use it for slower clock speed use cases, like a smart phone where clock speeds are much slower than a desktop or laptop computer with desktop being faster. You could also use it for AI training and many other use cases where you don't need the speed of a data server or desktop computer.
      Since Huawei is controlled by the CCP regardless of their lies (this phone launched without any warning, on the day the U.S. Secretary of Commerce arrived and was advertised on THAT day mostly with CCP members and one or two celebrities that use Apple phones, kind of laughable really), the CCP will subsidize it so even though it's not profitable to make a 7nm node without EUV using the same techniques ICs have been made for a few decades now, it will be made to look like they've done something great.
      But this has been the CCP's operating procedure for about 15 years now and has led to many noticeable failures. Make it look like they can do something great but the quality is always sub par.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Рік тому +39

      @@johndoh5182 another pile of NS, all you said is about US companies, not huawei, there are only 3 companies in this world can do 7nm chip, TSMC, samsung and chinse SMIC, no others, US can not even do 48nm , let alone 7nm , all advanced chips in US are bought from taiwan, also samsung chips are taiwanese technology, their 5nm is only equal to 7nm , so far, only taiwan can make most advanced chip, followed by china

    • @kelanzhi7269
      @kelanzhi7269 Рік тому

      @@johndoh5182傻比

  • @pwu8194
    @pwu8194 Рік тому +122

    Very few talked about SMIC hiring away some of the smartest engineers at TSMC, more than 250 of them in fact. So, with the people that know how, they have the breakthrough.

    • @meegz149
      @meegz149 Рік тому +22

      @pwu8194 As someone who has worked for vendors in the chip industry for almost a decade, it amazes me that chip manufacturers simply don't just offer our best guys a half a million a year. Most of the knowledge to repair and troubleshoot equipment is only in a few people's heads.

    • @coldspring22
      @coldspring22 Рік тому

      Why would anyone with any brain want to live under CCP dictatorship and corruption? CCP can lock you up anytime under any pretense. Long live CCP! LOL

    • @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh
      @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh Рік тому +29

      @@coldspring22Taiwanese speak mandarin so it’s easy to work in mainland unlike any other country .

    • @wedmunds
      @wedmunds Рік тому

      ​@@ScoobieDoo-zy1rhnot to mention a lot of Taiwanese are still pro-china, unlike what the media suggests

    • @aglis_
      @aglis_ Рік тому

      @@meegz149
      In a oligarch capitalist society, only the top wealthiest continue to get raises see increases in profit while everyone else just has to deal with the consequences of inflation, bubbles, recessions.
      Don't like it? Try suggesting that CEOs should get paid less you'll just get ignored and get seen as a "commie". LOL

  • @bockcui5740
    @bockcui5740 Рік тому +214

    LMAO Jordan Schneider. You mean the guy that said every single Chinese American researcher in the Chinese semiconductor industry resigned, annihilating it overnight? Mate, you sure you're credible?

    • @webboy998
      @webboy998 Рік тому +118

      quote: "This is what annihilation looks like: China’s semiconductor manufacturing industry was reduced to zero overnight. Complete collapse. No chance of survival."

    • @bockcui5740
      @bockcui5740 Рік тому +72

      @@webboy998 My guy was high on his own supply.

    • @jeffhicks8428
      @jeffhicks8428 Рік тому

      The entire US elite is high on it's own supply at this point. What started out as narrative that was meant for public consumption, for the plebs has become ingested by the very elite. This is called a snake eating it's own tail and it's how you get a dark age. The US is in the early, emergent stages of a new dark age. Take that to the bank. Generations of cynical opportunism has birthed new generations of actual true believer nutjob. That's how this works. The elite is high on their own supply of made for public consumption lies. @@bockcui5740

    • @lylewarren4391
      @lylewarren4391 Рік тому +14

      yes im sure he's credible, jordan is a 50/50

    •  Рік тому

      What a clown 🤡

  • @StephenYuan
    @StephenYuan Рік тому +20

    I suppose the main question here is whether Huawei's chiplet tech is able to produce results such that the lack of EUV ceases to become an insurmountable problem. I don't know how the physics will work out, but their engineers are clever, their motivation to bypass sanctions strong, and the resources they have to invest virtually unlimited. If the laws of physics allow for it, they're going to get results.
    Honestly, I wonder if the prohibitive cost (300 million US per machine) makes EUV all it's cracked up to be.

  • @noirsociety
    @noirsociety Рік тому +339

    "Big breakthroughs happen when what is suddenly possible meets what is desperately needed."
    -- Thomas Friedman

    • @johndoh5182
      @johndoh5182 Рік тому

      They didn't have a breakthrough and this is pure propaganda. It won't be known about until the phone is dissected. We don't know who made the chips. The Chinese GOVT. announced this phone when the US secretary of state was there. HUAWEI DIDN'T announce it before it launched.
      Huawei has NEVER made anything original. They've stolen everything from Samsung or Apple or CISCO or Google or a handful of other companies.
      IF by chance a fab in China made these chips, very unlikely regardless of who says what, they made it using old tech. But it was already KNOWN one Chinese fab can do this. What they CAN'T do is make 7nm with a low defect rate, so it would typically be restricted to military applications because it won't be profitable to sell, but since the Chinese govt. is behind Huawei they'll subsidize it.
      China is the largest propaganda machine in the world.

    • @treeinafield5022
      @treeinafield5022 Рік тому +73

      ​@@thelastofthehitachi972we're talking about semiconductors here lil bro

    • @Ilovecruise
      @Ilovecruise Рік тому +35

      @@thelastofthehitachi972you know you are sick af when u bring non relevant topic here

    • @dfinlen
      @dfinlen Рік тому

      ​@@Ilovecruiseah who cares about the sick af genocide of the Uyghers as long as I have my shiny new phone.

    • @Anonymous------
      @Anonymous------ Рік тому

      @@thelastofthehitachi972
      There's more freedom and human rights under CCP than under your crazy "democratic" mafia "government".

  • @rowanhaigh8782
    @rowanhaigh8782 Рік тому +23

    Thank you for the video, excellent work, as usual. ❤

    • @hg2.
      @hg2. Рік тому

      Why does he say "we" when speaking of advances that benefit the Chinese Communist Party?

    • @fredfunn5413
      @fredfunn5413 Рік тому

      Because he is secretly a CCP member? Is that what you want to hear? Or maybe he is just anti-American, anti-hegemony, anti-bullying? @@hg2.

  • @omgnowairly
    @omgnowairly Рік тому +8

    We've had many issues with the OpenGL drivers on the Mate. They used the desktop reference drivers so it reports the wrong values. It has 16 texture units but reports 256... etc.

  • @ErikWalle
    @ErikWalle Рік тому +470

    Fabulous coverage, so respectably balanced. Appreciate your work.

    • @freemanol
      @freemanol Рік тому +12

      So hard to see truth out there. Everything is propaganda

    • @ellowell8160
      @ellowell8160 Рік тому +1

      I just like that he doesn't say WAHwei. Is it that hard to start a word with an H

    • @jeffjohnson5053
      @jeffjohnson5053 Рік тому +5

      I have actually been to china several times. And purchasing some of the electronics, sadly to say they are inferior. I kid you not. You are all free to go to Guangzhou, Shenzhen to their computer districts and buy products for yourself. As for this new china made phone, from South korean news, it is a copy of South Korean computer chips. How this china chip and phone will last compared to other nation's phones, only time will tell. Other china chip companies like Oppo failed, ZTE failed as well. So again, only time will tell is this new chip coped from 'South Korea will be a good product or not.

    • @johnsmith-cw3wo
      @johnsmith-cw3wo Рік тому +31

      @@jeffjohnson5053 you know iPhone is made in China... also Xiaomi.

    • @chickenfishhybrid44
      @chickenfishhybrid44 Рік тому +5

      ​@johnsmith-cw3wo they don't design any of it.

  • @doniherald7745
    @doniherald7745 Рік тому +25

    I read news back then they say it takes 5 years to catch up 7nm, well it's just arround 3 years now.
    I hope this will be a good competitor.

    • @kinglee8160
      @kinglee8160 Рік тому

      China will never let you feel disapointed as a competitor

    • @metagen77
      @metagen77 Місяць тому

      @@kinglee8160 *always

  • @cherubin7th
    @cherubin7th Рік тому +10

    People don't understand the real breakthrough is the possible supply chain independence China gains from that. And how fast gaps can close.

    • @marcos-ll2yr
      @marcos-ll2yr Рік тому +4

      China is freeing themselves from U.S and this is amazing I wish Brazil do the same thing but we are far behind

  • @jamesho8820
    @jamesho8820 Рік тому +168

    Harvard Business review: "China cannot innovate"? Thank-you for clarifying my understanding of the Kirin 9000s. I always understood that one could produce a 7nm chip using DUV a process which I thought that TSMC had developed. But I thought that this process was not cost effective. Kudos to SMIC for making it economically feasible for their latest phone. .But this depends on DUV which, after 1/1/2024 will no longer be available per ASML. I suppose China will have to either manufacture their own DUV lithography or another process to come up with high performance chips. As it has said been before, "mother is the necessity of invention."

    • @edfhobbies556
      @edfhobbies556 Рік тому +19

      "innovate" meaning they mostly designed the chips inside and out, I've heard no one answer this question. Of course they can copy well, design most of the chip inside to out? .... nnnnn

    • @briancase6180
      @briancase6180 Рік тому +45

      Did anyone verify that these chips are being produced at a profit to smic? No? Then why are you presuming they can make a profit? I think it's unlikely that they are making money now. That doesn't mean they won't find a way, but it also doesn't guarantee that this process will ever be profitable.

    • @alexhajnal107
      @alexhajnal107 Рік тому +67

      @@edfhobbies556 China understands that they need to develop indigenous technology. Simply copying (as the Soviets did) or rebadging (as Russia is doing) leaves one vulnerable; developing the tech oneself is critical for tech independence even if that means taking rather longer to get to a similar level of technology.

    • @dex6316
      @dex6316 Рік тому +29

      TSMC is using DUV on their N6 node. TSMC N7 and N7P were DUV while N7+ was EUV. It’s EUV that’s not very cost effective, so if you can make a node function well without it then you don’t want to use it. EUV becomes mandatory on 5nm class nodes and smaller.

    • @TheFirebird123456
      @TheFirebird123456 Рік тому +55

      ​@@briancase6180in many ways for this tech i dont think china cares if it is ever profitable.

  • @raycomeau6866
    @raycomeau6866 Рік тому +134

    TechInsights, an Ottawa-based information platform on the semiconductor industry, said in a report that it had analyzed the new phone and found evidence of a made-in-China design and the use of a 7-nanometer technology that is a milestone for the Chinese chip industry.

    • @hyy3657
      @hyy3657 Рік тому +4

      that's faster then we expected!

    • @sean70729
      @sean70729 Рік тому +2

      Damn my 2020 Xbox has a 7nnm CPU.😂

    • @dekumutant
      @dekumutant Рік тому +10

      Boy this reads like a bot comment

    • @hyy3657
      @hyy3657 Рік тому

      @anglohan5428 those has nothing to do with tech.

    • @bjorn1583
      @bjorn1583 Рік тому

      @anglohan5428 free the world from US aggression

  • @SiroccoSeven
    @SiroccoSeven Рік тому +36

    By far the most comprehensive,unbiased journalism. Not picking any sides just pure hard facts. Keep up your good work. Been your avid subscribers for years. Always the best documentary coverage

    • @araujofi
      @araujofi Рік тому +4

      There is no such thing as unbiased journalism, all journalism has a side, even if it doesn't seem like it

    • @SiroccoSeven
      @SiroccoSeven Рік тому +2

      @@araujofi factual reporting. Shares both sides of personal comment. No defamation. You will notice the difference in experience watching news and pure documentary. One brews sensation. The later reports what happens.

    • @araujofi
      @araujofi Рік тому +3

      Putting American sanctions as something "hmm, that's just a detail" is literally choosing a side... like I said, everyone chooses a side, even if the person doesn't know, it's always subtle. Just as HSJ made a playlist of videos like "the trade war between China and the US", it's completely documentary and factual? yes, but they put up narratives as if China wanted a war or that the US didn't start with the sanctions and trying to boycott them. This is choosing a side, the narrative hides this.@@SiroccoSeven

    • @tweedy4sg
      @tweedy4sg Рік тому

      @@SiroccoSeven may be factual but with inaccurate fact.

    • @SiroccoSeven
      @SiroccoSeven Рік тому

      well, you've got to give him the benefit of a doubt@@tweedy4sg

  • @Clark-Mills
    @Clark-Mills Рік тому +2

    Great work as usual, thanks!
    Nice to see your sub's growing; much deserved.

  • @applesb3507
    @applesb3507 Рік тому +39

    Fun fact, the picture that you showed at 09:48 is the front gate of SMIC fab1 and fab8 and you can see the northeast hall on the left, which is not allowed to enter for lower league employees, any engineer does that gets a HL.

    • @yensteel
      @yensteel Рік тому +6

      HL? Half life?

    • @armyofninjas9055
      @armyofninjas9055 Рік тому

      ​@@yensteelhand-lick

    • @applesb3507
      @applesb3507 Рік тому +6

      @@yensteel Highlights. If you get enough of these, your expected career life will be reduced by half

    • @MouliSankarS
      @MouliSankarS Рік тому +11

      ​@@applesb3507 It is Half Life then, for thier career.

  • @mikeca2749
    @mikeca2749 Рік тому +77

    It’s a mature SMIC N+2 node with performance at least on par with Snapdragon 888 (Samsung 5nm) and the original Kirin 9000 (TSMC 5 nm) with GPU function appears locked on AnTuTu. I would have guessed using DUV SAQD but there are rumors they benefited from some early EUV elements. China has close to 100 1980Dxi’s with a domesticated part supply. Another rumor is SMEE will deliver its own DUV machine by year end that is equivalent to the 2000Di. The yield on the Kirin 9000s is now thought to be at least 80% if not 90% - if you FIB enough of them you can get statistics on CD and overlay. You need to adjust your timeline for “China speed”.

    • @gahnyun2016
      @gahnyun2016 Рік тому

      N+2 is just what they want you to believe, something they hide behind. A crude EUV is far better than N+2, which is likely what is really used.

  • @ccctube5721
    @ccctube5721 Рік тому +4

    This almost feels like a direct message to the government imploring them to take action

  • @marcclarence2260
    @marcclarence2260 Рік тому +108

    Speaking of LAM, I would love to see a video on them (I work on LAM equipment). There history, achievements and so on. Great video as always, keep up the good work.

    • @zr2ee1
      @zr2ee1 Рік тому +6

      You could do a history of novellus before LAM bought them out

    • @hyy3657
      @hyy3657 Рік тому +3

      I prefer KLA

    • @JohnDorian-j7x
      @JohnDorian-j7x Рік тому

      lam always poached all the guys from my friend's/our dept's plasma lab back when i was in grad school. They definitely have direct picks from most of the us's research labs and fund like half of their plasma research efforts

  • @ic7481
    @ic7481 Рік тому +65

    My neighbour owns an orchard, and sells me apples. One day he tells me that he won't sell them to me anymore, because I've made a successful business selling apple pies that are better than his. I then go and take the seeds from the apples, and grow my own orchard. My neighbour then throws a tantrum and accuses be of stealing his apple seeds. He then refuses to sells me his strawberries...

    • @kulkrafts3143
      @kulkrafts3143 Рік тому

      You do sound like a Chinese thief. If your neighbor’s Apple seed was patented or had a contract restricting your use of his seeds then your neighbor has rights, thieves don’t care about patents or contracts. But in Huawei’s case, even your apple pie used his recipe and his packaging. So your neighbor was kind to you for not suing you to stop selling his apple pie recipes. Only reason your neighbor doesn’t sue you in China is because Chinese judges like stealing technologies from other country and dismiss all IP theft cases against Chinese.
      I do understand it is hard to conceptualize what IP theft is coming from third world country with Bronze Age technology, but being stubborn about theft was taught to be unwise and punishable act by a confused sage 2500 years ago. Just because Chinese government says IP theft from foreign country is patriotic acts doesn’t make it so.

    • @tobiasrietveld3819
      @tobiasrietveld3819 Рік тому +3

      A cutting-edge 200 million dollar lithography machine isn't the same as some apple seeds. Also China's orchard seems to have flooding issues lately.

    • @ascra1693
      @ascra1693 Рік тому +3

      Growing an apple tree from a seed can take 20 years before you get apples.. this makes no sense

    • @ic7481
      @ic7481 Рік тому +10

      @@ascra1693 Allegory isn't to be taken absolutely literally - it is an illustration.

    • @parttimethinker7611
      @parttimethinker7611 Рік тому +1

      Hahaha, Is this a real story?

  • @owenstv
    @owenstv Рік тому +245

    As always, amazing information for us mortals. I work at the gas plants that supply the chip plants. Amazing to be involed in anyway I can.

    • @ntabile
      @ntabile Рік тому +3

      I guess: SoxalAir Liquid or...?

    • @tonglu3699
      @tonglu3699 Рік тому +3

      God's honest work, it is.

    • @trobinson14kc
      @trobinson14kc Рік тому +1

      Linde?

    • @kulkrafts3143
      @kulkrafts3143 Рік тому

      ChatGPT, Bard, OpenAI or any others can give you better non-biased information than Asianometry. The information here are easy to understand but stained with slight CCP propaganda.
      Asianometry make it seems like evil America is controlling all corporations to punish hardworking China, but Japan, South Korea, Netherlands, England, Australia, France, Germany are all agreeing with America on China policy. That is why ASML, SK Hynix, Lam, SVG, Google, etc can not do business with China on some strategic equipments and materials. Australia reported another spying scheme by Huawei last month. Most technology journalists don’t report these because of CCP retaliation. Even Google doesn’t allow anti China UA-camrs to be monetized in many democratic countries due to CCP retaliation to their countries.

  • @roc7880
    @roc7880 Рік тому +3

    I love the style and content. Did you ever contemplate having also a regular podcast with interviews?

  • @CarlZha
    @CarlZha Рік тому +19

    Jordan Schneider tweeted on Oct 14 2022 "This is what annihilation looks like: China’s semiconductor manufacturing industry was reduced to zero overnight. Complete collapse. No chance of survival." LMAO

    •  Рік тому

      He's a total clown 🤡😅

    • @genbond7459
      @genbond7459 Рік тому +1

      Fancy meeting you here Sultan Carl Zhah🤣

    • @MithunOnTheNet
      @MithunOnTheNet Рік тому +1

      Oh look, a CCP propaganda 🐕on a platform banned in Mainland China by his own employers.

  • @shizuku00tw
    @shizuku00tw Рік тому +27

    It’s no secret that China is almost done building their EUV.

    • @metagen77
      @metagen77 Місяць тому

      So, where is it? L O L

    • @台湾总督
      @台湾总督 Місяць тому

      中国是最大的芯片出口国,虽然不是最先进的芯片。
      遗憾的告诉你这是百分之90以上国产的。

  • @alexhu7939
    @alexhu7939 Рік тому +1

    what a no nonsense, straight talk channel! 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @RayMak
    @RayMak Рік тому +3

    Not so quietly

  • @alexanderducat5618
    @alexanderducat5618 Рік тому +91

    Thanks for your videos, man. They are well-researched pieces which tell complex and detailed stories in an accessible way, and I don't see another channel in this field maintaining this balance of depth, detail and accessibility. It's criminal that the algorithm hasn't sent them stratospheric yet, but it's surely only a matter of time.

    • @dice138
      @dice138 Рік тому

      @Dr.Lev_Luminesk You are pretty accurate about the Gen Z kids🤣🤣🤣

    • @alexanderducat5618
      @alexanderducat5618 Рік тому

      @Dr.Lev_Luminesk The reaction to Perun's videos gives me hope though

  • @drtracking
    @drtracking Рік тому +6

    I wonder what software they used to design the semiconductor. And did someone said it's an ARM based processor? I thought that was licensed .

    • @botdcypher
      @botdcypher Рік тому +1

      RISC-V

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 Рік тому +4

      Yeah Huawei wrote their own EDA software for this too. And ARM is licensed by ARM-China, which is legally forbidden on creation to have any American shareholders.

    • @saahan-nn1fe
      @saahan-nn1fe Рік тому +1

      Huawei subsidiary SMIC apparently already has the ability to design its own chips

    • @fredfunn5413
      @fredfunn5413 Рік тому

      SMIC is not a Huawei subsidiary@@saahan-nn1fe

    • @drtracking
      @drtracking Рік тому +3

      @@botdcypher HiSilicon, who manufactures tells it's ARM v8.2A based. Huawei used Synopsys.
      Using RISC V ( Open Platform ) would involved a total redesign of the operating system and all the libraries. Therefore Huawei has to give the code to the public, and they are not very "Open" about it.

  • @vlhc4642
    @vlhc4642 Рік тому +56

    Nobody seem to realized the real implication: Mate 60 doesn't just use Kirin 9000s, every other chip in it, from amplifiers to modems to power regulators are ALL Chinese, the only except is SK's memory which China can already make and why Huawei was wiling to use SK.
    With this phone, and SMEE's DUV machine, China became the only country in history to control the entire semiconductor supply chain, this doesn't just mean China no longer need any foreign chipmakers to make their phones, this means China doesn't need any foreign makers to exist, especially TSMC.
    This isn't about money anymore, the moment US government stepped in, it stopped being a commercial competition about who can make the best phone/chip, it became a cold war about who can make ANY phone/chip.
    On China's side in this cold war, Huawei just demonstrated China CAN make phones and chips despite US attempt to stop them, now the question is can the US make chips or phones if China tries to stop them.
    The entire US tech industry now relies on TSMC, China is now the only country that don't need TSMC to exist, Chinese navy and airforce already encircle the island daily, and as far as Beijing is concerned, Taiwan is a Chinese province that must comply with Chinese export controls.
    America just fired everything they have at the monster, the smoke has cleared, the monster is still there, and it's now looking at you.

    • @MonoPrime
      @MonoPrime Рік тому

      Open it up baby. Enjoy running up against 10 carriers with almost 100 years of experience in carrier operations. Using your what? Destroyers? You’re one actual aircraft carrier that’s not even nuclear? Don’t overestimate yourselves - war would destroy China, especially given almost every nation that has a meaningful military and economy is going to be siding against China.

    • @yudhistio1653
      @yudhistio1653 Рік тому

      Well the monster also making enemy of her neighbors and prospective market. As long that monster stay harassing her neighbors. US eventually will gain more allies to face the monster. No matter how big you are, it’s impossible to win against the world.

    • @surroundgatari
      @surroundgatari Рік тому +14

      Alright XI

    • @surroundgatari
      @surroundgatari Рік тому +9

      Are you aware Asianometry's country of operations is Taiwan? Maybe consider being a bit more civil toward this lovely man and his excellent content? You can hurl this insightful commentary at someone in the twitter replies instead

    • @MichaelMantion
      @MichaelMantion Рік тому

      Once they take control of the Fabs in Formosa things will get really interesting.

  • @karthur3421
    @karthur3421 Рік тому +4

    Love your bit at 13:21 South Korean catching up to Japan and eventually decimating them at their own industry.
    And history will repeat itself if the rabbit becomes too lazy, the turtle catches up eventually.
    Why western world thinks science works differently in China is beyond me, with how much China has been throwing into R&D for the past decades, I am not surprised they have caught up and also forged ahead in certain sectors.

    • @MrSpiritmonger
      @MrSpiritmonger Рік тому +1

      It's policy wonks that don't understand how technology works.

  • @bobsmith3983
    @bobsmith3983 Рік тому +2

    The 7nM refers to the smallest feature size or trace size.

    • @cuifrank5905
      @cuifrank5905 Рік тому +1

      no, in finfet era this nm represents none of that

  • @michae1601
    @michae1601 Рік тому +7

    Come back and do a follow up when you have more information.

  • @rebym
    @rebym Рік тому +19

    While everyone has covered this, it was your video I've been waiting for. Thank you.

  • @AlexSchendel
    @AlexSchendel Рік тому +25

    I would be very surprised if EUV gets to the point where it can obviate the need for 193i litho on current and future nodes. The best way that EUV is being used currently is to reduce the number of masks needed in the densest, most complex patterns. Intel detailed that use in their VLSI paper on Intel 4, where they noted that without EUV, Intel 4 would have required ~30% more masks than Intel 7. However with EUV, it requires ~20% fewer masks than Intel 7. So at Intel 4, that's a 50% mask count savings by using EUV.
    Of course, the limiting factor is the power of the EUV laser, and while ASML is working hard to increase the power of the laser, as you've covered in previous videos, but I still have my doubts regarding how much they'll be able to increase the power of the laser given how intricate their process of shooting a tin droplets 50000 times per second is. And with EUV, it seems to always be a trade-off between stochastic defects and throughput. Increase the exposure time and you'll decrease the stochastic defects, but your throughput will tank. Or do the opposite. Even as the EUV source increases in power, between the potential for increased mirror count (with the current count of 11, ~98% of the EUV light is absorbed before it even hits the wafer...) and the potential for a required increase in dose due to future nodes requiring tighter features, I can imagine a future where throughput barely (if ever) increases due to all the factors working against it.
    That said, I have very little knowledge depth in the field overall, so maybe there are big changes in the works to increase uptime, increase power, and increase reflection or the like to dramatically increase throughput.

    • @ЖанибекБекхожин
      @ЖанибекБекхожин Рік тому +9

      Mirror design is probably already limited by the laws of physics. It was brought once on the channel, a free electron laser generating EUV might be the next big thing (or maybe not)

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 Рік тому

      this the shit niggas saying in the youtube comment sections followed by "I have little knowledge depth in the field"
      No other platform is on the same level.

  • @MikiSuzuki2000
    @MikiSuzuki2000 Рік тому +1

    Didn't Arm terminate the license agreement between Huawei and Hisilicon?

  • @lucysluckyday
    @lucysluckyday Рік тому

    What's the image at 11:03 showing? Clearly they are FinFETs using the classic gate on 3 sides of the fins, which of course is pumping current through the channel via 6 fins (with all the usual benefits of surface area, electrostatic control and other characteristics), but where are the interconnects? Oh, I think I just answered my own question. That surface the gates are sitting on is actually NOT the wafer surface (i.e. not a semiconducting layer), it's actually an insulation layer (whether dioxide, PSG, or whatever), which means the interconnects are buried/hidden underneath that insulation layer, which is why the interconnects are not visible? LOL, yeah I think that's the answer to my own question ... about how the FETs were powered.

  • @VioletPrism
    @VioletPrism Рік тому +46

    I had a Huawei phone 5 years ago and it was absolutely amazing for 200 dollars and i still miss many of its features going back to Samsung.

    • @Sniperboy5551
      @Sniperboy5551 Рік тому +8

      Do you also miss being spied on?

    • @fullmetaltheorist
      @fullmetaltheorist Рік тому +11

      I had a 200 dollar Huawei and it was horrible. The screen died very fast and the battery lost its charge relatively quick. My brother's phone did the same. Now we are using Samsung again and we are happy with them.

    • @VioletPrism
      @VioletPrism Рік тому +45

      ​@Sniperboy5551 now I get spied on by the NSA instead what's the difference?

    • @VioletPrism
      @VioletPrism Рік тому +15

      @Sniperboy5551 worth it for how good the camera was really lol

    • @OccultDemonCassette
      @OccultDemonCassette Рік тому +1

      ​@@Sniperboy5551you're being spied on no matter who produces the communication device. Remember that whole Edward Snowden document leak thing? It doesn't matter what country you're in - American tech is spying on you.

  • @512Berlinetta
    @512Berlinetta Рік тому +4

    Thank you for the balanced analysis.

  • @vanowen3976
    @vanowen3976 Рік тому +65

    Asianometry isn't about furthering ideology, its furthering facts as they present themselves at the time. You'd be hard pressed to find an equal media content with such attention to technology, as a computer scientist, Asianometry is the best source of information free from bias. This is much appreciated!

    • @mod4rchive
      @mod4rchive Рік тому +6

      Asianometry is definetly biased; just look at non technology videos

    • @xblade11230
      @xblade11230 Рік тому

      Asianometry is biased, he is pro taiwan and anti china, and lives in Taiwan he makes his anti china bias very clear

    • @xblade11230
      @xblade11230 Рік тому +2

      ​@Anonymous------ Lol he is biased he was a silicon valley engineer, family is taiwan descended and now works in taiwan

    • @cryptocsguy9282
      @cryptocsguy9282 Рік тому

      @@xblade11230 really ? I thought he was just a random tech guy on the internet ngl

    • @xblade11230
      @xblade11230 Рік тому +3

      @cryptocsguy9282 look at his older videos, you can go to his channel and sort by older videos , it's all antichina , he has done interviews, podcasts, zoom discussions, guest speaking where once in awhile he can't help but let his anti china bias slip and has revealed his identity.
      It's only recently in the last couple of years did he start pretending to be unbiased and impartial as his youtube channel started taking off and he changed from being a anti china youtuber to a semi youtuber

  • @vilaintrolltrollinsky8007
    @vilaintrolltrollinsky8007 Рік тому +63

    If China Can really make a 7nm chips.
    They can supply 99 % of the chips market by themselves.

    • @adaslesniak
      @adaslesniak Рік тому +15

      Limited amount of lithography machines, so no, they can't do it all. But then yes - except supercomputers, phones and cloud servers, desktop workstation, top gaming machines everything else is in their reach. As soon as they develop their own tools so they need not to import them for scaling up.
      And they do control output for most chips. Consumer doesn't care if his toy uses Chinese chip or Korean one, or Japanese, or American - consumer is barely aware that there are chips in products he buys - toys, fridges, washing machines, car sensors, abs controllers, light controllers, headphones, bluetooth speakers... millions and millions of stuff. They produce it, they decide what they will put inside.

    • @olibeau7955
      @olibeau7955 Рік тому +21

      @@adaslesniak SMEE makes SMIC's DUV machines, they don't even depend on ASML anymore for lithography machines. So the amount of lithography machines will be meaningless soon since SMEE is funded by the Chinese government to produce as many machines as they can the soonest possible.

    • @timloo6191
      @timloo6191 Рік тому +3

      They will. Its a matter of time unless ang mohs wanna do gunboat diplomacy again. A repeat of what happen in 1848. Perhaps history will repeat again as ang mohs are the chosen one

    • @MichaelMantion
      @MichaelMantion Рік тому +1

      Once they take control of the fabs on Formosa then they can make anything they want. Until the US bombs the fabs.. LOL

    • @johnsmith-cw3wo
      @johnsmith-cw3wo Рік тому +1

      soon they will make 28nm with 100% chinese machines. - no need for ASML and other equipment.

  • @kennethli8
    @kennethli8 Рік тому +2

    Late December 2023 information finally have proven that SMIC were able to stockpile EUV machines from ASML before the sanctions went into effect and that Huawei received intellectual property know-how through multiple subsidiaries incorporated in the USA that receive US know-how.

  • @soldiersvejk2053
    @soldiersvejk2053 Рік тому +124

    When even Asianometry acknowledges that mainland China has a breakthrough, you had better believe it does.
    Edit: I am from mainland China and was not fully convinced until this video...

    • @traderboi2662
      @traderboi2662 Рік тому +27

      Must have been painful! 😂

    • @iszotope
      @iszotope Рік тому

      Wondering if this would signal to the US that their tech sanctions against China would go hardcore mode..

    • @Unforseenak
      @Unforseenak Рік тому

      Its CCP CCCP alliance propaganda, they either stole the technology, put a 7nm sticker on 14 nm or it doesn't exist.

    • @Jake-om9no
      @Jake-om9no Рік тому +9

      @@traderboi2662 I do not agree. I think Asianometry has been quite fair about China's progress

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 Рік тому

      ​@@Jake-om9no
      Asianometry guy is a Nip-phile .

  • @appl2597
    @appl2597 Рік тому +82

    Thanks for your unbiased review of China's new 7nm chip. Aside from Bloomberg, Nikkei, and CNA, there hasn't been much coverage of it outside China and Taiwan. It feels weird for a supposedly breakthrough achievement.

    • @kennyyodune1727
      @kennyyodune1727 Рік тому +73

      That's how you know it's 100% legit. That and all the lower channel Sinophobes are saying it's garbage PLUS mainstream media not covering it. Once it hits both of these criteria, you know the report is accurate.

    • @vueport99
      @vueport99 Рік тому +8

      Well there's one thing we're now certain of, the chip was made using imported tech.
      This was a very good show of force to the Americans. In showing that despite all the sanctions, money talks. They were still able to find ways around getting the machines and buying productions.

    • @kennyyodune1727
      @kennyyodune1727 Рік тому +29

      @@vueport99 Like the Grand Canyon, good things always take time. In a little bit, China will be fully domestically produced. A bit after that, 2nm. A bit further and...

    • @SmileyBMM
      @SmileyBMM Рік тому +25

      ​@@vueport99sanctions are ineffective? Wow, who could've guessed...

    • @HeroDai2448
      @HeroDai2448 Рік тому +13

      it’s not that big of a deal. They are years behind and they can’t produce EUV machines and even if they make them ASML is decades ahead of them since they will already start shipping high-NA machines

  • @dosgos
    @dosgos Рік тому +56

    China has such a strong electronics industry, it will be interesting to see how far they can go "in-house". Perhaps exports out of China would be challenged by trade barriers and intellectual property challenges.
    Regardless, international tech businesses may lose their share in the Chinese market. You can bet the chip, equipment, and consumer goods companies around the world are in some level of panic.
    I hope this all sorts itself out and everyone wins.

    • @delavan9141
      @delavan9141 Рік тому

      LOL China hasn't made any chip breakthroughs (they steal others' intellectual property as they do in every other field) and is currently 5 years behind. They aren't making 7nm chips.

    • @嘻嘻大好人
      @嘻嘻大好人 Рік тому +17

      I bet we can see a redefinition of "international" in near future.

    • @stefanodadamo6809
      @stefanodadamo6809 Рік тому +17

      Keeping markets reasonably open, instead of closing them histerically, might do the trick.

    • @VaioletteWestover
      @VaioletteWestover Рік тому

      I think it will become increasingly more and more difficult for the U.S. to justify its racist sanctions because we tolerated their "national defense" angle because okay whatever, but if they keep trying to block China outside their own country after China has proven that they can and will overcome U.S. sanctions, it becomes undeniable that the U.S. just doesn't want China to succeed which becomes morally untenable for anyone with a conscience to justify.
      Like how is the U.S. going to justify blocking other countries from buying SMIC products for example? They can't because it's stupid and I hope countries justifiable laugh in their faces.

    • @seiyachan
      @seiyachan Рік тому

      The US doesn't want everyone to win, they just want China to lose and they win (scrap national security, it's big corp lobbying), at the cost of loss to everyone else.

  • @rubadub79
    @rubadub79 Рік тому +8

    How ridiculous is it that China has to make every single part of the phone themselves?

    • @Fei_Ge
      @Fei_Ge Рік тому +8

      It is also absurd that the United States banned TSMC from making chips for Huawei

    • @戚文玮
      @戚文玮 Рік тому +3

      😂When you reach the critical point, you will find that you are omnipotent and no one can stop you from doing anything

    • @russelfang7434
      @russelfang7434 Рік тому +3

      You should be curious about why US always gets so much hysteria on China's tech progression.

  • @catonpillow
    @catonpillow Рік тому +49

    On Oct 14 2022 Jordan Schneider said: "This is what annihilation looks like: China’s semiconductor manufacturing industry was reduced to zero overnight. Complete collapse. No chance of survival."
    Asianometry: 'Thanks Jordan for your thoughts'.

    • @catonpillow
      @catonpillow Рік тому +26

      @anglohan5428 Indeed, Tibet, Hong Kong and Xinjiang are free. You are correct! :)

    • @yoyolim538
      @yoyolim538 Рік тому

      @anglohan5428 Free Yourself - stop torturing yourself

    • @umarjongi3590
      @umarjongi3590 Рік тому

      @anglohan5428Free Puerto Rico, Free Hawaii, Free Guam

    • @unifieddynasty
      @unifieddynasty Рік тому

      @anglohan5428 go liberate all your Anglo colonies, troll.

    • @CircuitCoreAI
      @CircuitCoreAI Рік тому

      ​@anglohan5428Anglo propagandist

  • @erictayet
    @erictayet Рік тому +17

    Very interesting! From your previous videos, we know it's possible to use multimasking techniques for DUV lithography to get to these nodes. So SMIC has brute force the process then. And it seems they still have the license to use the software for silicon layout. But they are then restricted to the current Arm cores and cannot get the latest core architecture. Question is performance wise, can they keep up even if they can go down to 5nm.

    • @rabbitazteca23
      @rabbitazteca23 Рік тому +18

      only time will tell. I am betting on their innovation. When the world is against you, you can only go up

    • @Grak70
      @Grak70 Рік тому +8

      You can brute force a lot of things. We still don’t know what their yield or cost is. I expect it’s pretty poor. Not particularly problematic for SMIC, they can just dip into public money to make up for it until those things improve.

    • @ZxZ239
      @ZxZ239 Рік тому +7

      @@Grak70 And what do you think they will be stuck with the tools they have forever? It is only matter of time they produce their own DUV and EUV. Then what? Even more sanctions?

    • @Grak70
      @Grak70 Рік тому +2

      @@ZxZ239 I never said any such thing. Stop being so defensive.

    • @TheReferrer72
      @TheReferrer72 Рік тому +1

      @@ZxZ239 Its not a matter of time if they have only there own market to sell into.

  • @OccultDemonCassette
    @OccultDemonCassette Рік тому +34

    It's just sad that these ridiculous sanctions are preventing a level competitive playing field. Congrats to SMIC and Huawei for being able to provide technology for their citizens despite the unreasonable hostility from the World Police.

    • @Gilberto90
      @Gilberto90 Рік тому

      Unreasonable hostility? So China isn't making unlawful territorial claims on its neighbors (against UNCLOS which the PRC signed) and making threats of war against a democracy and strategic supplier of semiconductors for America?

    • @PEK-97
      @PEK-97 Рік тому +16

      It's not too bad. For the last two decades the mentality of "Why make when you can buy, why buy when you can rent" was rampant among Chinese minds. The world's factory simply manufactured, it did not innovate. The US sanctions helped to shatter this mentality, for an industry in China to not innovate is to cease to exist.

    • @OccultDemonCassette
      @OccultDemonCassette Рік тому +9

      @@PEK-97 silver linings.

    • @commie5211
      @commie5211 Рік тому +3

      I mean, all Chinese engineers thx the US for that, otherwise they would never get the funding to do it by themselves, lots of jobs created.😂

    • @snarfity
      @snarfity Рік тому

      The playing field is not level if the Chinese government does not protect outside companies intellectual property in the internal market while taking advantage of western copyright and IP law

  • @jonathanseagraves8140
    @jonathanseagraves8140 Рік тому +17

    The most obvious form of western propaganda I've seen on UA-cam are those "china insider" videos. I like that you are dipping into current events, it gives me a better perspective from someone that has a history of being generally trustworthy/nonbias. Don't let the haters get to you.

    • @NotASeriousMoose
      @NotASeriousMoose Рік тому

      Western propaganda?! They are literally Chinese people in exile.

  • @billlodhia5640
    @billlodhia5640 Рік тому +1

    I met with Huawei at GITEX a few weeks ago, and they're now touting they have their own NAND flash and DRAM chips and controllers, no longer being sanctionable. Any news on this?

  • @Funktastico
    @Funktastico Рік тому

    7:00 I think your past video mentioned about Japan is the only supplier of silicon wafers for advance nodes chip manufacturing ?

  • @JimFeig
    @JimFeig Рік тому +3

    It’s probably an Imagination derived gpu. I also don’t understand why this is a surprise. What might be surprising is if they are using newer arm ip.

    • @Guywith2usernames
      @Guywith2usernames Рік тому +6

      The real surprise will come from china's homegrown risc-v ISA, OpenXiangshan. Probably the last generation of huawei phones with any arm IP at all.

    • @JimFeig
      @JimFeig Рік тому +2

      @@Guywith2usernames That's not really homegrown when someone else came up with the base IP. And the software isn't fully fleshed out yet. It's getting there bit by bit they add more to the Linux kernel.

  • @bozo5632
    @bozo5632 Рік тому +8

    Here we go. I was ignoring the headlines, waiting for this.

  • @fallout560
    @fallout560 Рік тому +59

    It's going to be interesting moving forward. The EUV wall will always exist, unless they find a way to make a brand new way of making sub 5 or 7nm chips with a completely new type of machine. Either that or they might decide 5nm is good enough and go for a potential paradigm shift in the same way China did with electric cars.
    I think the surprise was mainly from the mainstream press. The people whose interest extends beyond the front page of Bloomberg knew about this already.

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 Рік тому +7

      If you neatly scrutinize the EUV machine , you'll find it has far less set on lenses in the proless than DUV. Only some critical parts have to be broken in. So it is not so hard or so easy to build in near future.

    • @duyataksis5210
      @duyataksis5210 Рік тому

      China just makes its own EUV lithography machine. What connections is your brain failing to make here?

    • @ihmpall
      @ihmpall Рік тому +22

      “Will always exist” yeah give it a few years

    • @delavan9141
      @delavan9141 Рік тому +7

      What "paradigm shift?" You mean the one that features spontaneous combustion?

    • @mujur9101
      @mujur9101 Рік тому

      Huawei had filed an EUV patent last year.
      I think the main different between EUV and DUV is the light source. Using DUV source light for smaller node resulting in low yield rate due to something with the light. But if you read Huawei EUV patent, they actually hacked how the source light works. So it can be used at smaller node with high yield rate.
      You can search Huawei EUV Patent.

  • @Dude-yo5ec
    @Dude-yo5ec 11 місяців тому

    Can you explain more about why “Xnm” doesn’t equal to how small transistors are?

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 8 місяців тому

      More like how many transistors you can fit on a 400mm^2 plate. If you check the transistor density for Intel 4 which is 7nm, it has 123 million transistor per mm^2, Intel 7 has 106 million. TSMC is leading because their latest have 215 million transistor per mm^2. Samsung is a bit left behind, their 7nm has 106 million, but their latest is 150. SMIC transistor density is 113, as of now TSMC is 90% higher, Samsung 32%, Intel 8%.

  • @mourady5588
    @mourady5588 4 місяці тому

    8:43 AGED LIKE FINE WINE! Ascend 910C is already here less than a year later.

  • @cerealkiller69420
    @cerealkiller69420 Рік тому +22

    The "P" cores are custom as well, not just the gpu. They are repurposed server cpu cores designed by huawei with smt enabled

    • @johndoh5182
      @johndoh5182 Рік тому +7

      You mean like the P cores from Intel CPUs? I mean months ago they said they made a new CPU. It was an Intel CPU where lasers erased the markings and new markings added.
      Huawei has never designed anything, they've copied everything. They're the worst offender of IP theft of ANY company in electronics EVER.

    • @aa-hb3tg
      @aa-hb3tg Рік тому +6

      @@johndoh5182u r what it’s exhibit A of cries for dying American empire and the dying Anglo Saxon race.
      Rest assure, the future is a world without west in it

    • @nastronomical
      @nastronomical Рік тому +8

      @@aa-hb3tg Aww found the chinshill fellas.

    • @alexhajnal107
      @alexhajnal107 Рік тому +3

      @@johndoh5182 To be specific, the Chinese Powerstar CPUs are rebadged Intel Comet Lake chips. I believe there was also a Russian company that released Intel CPUs remarked to appear domestically-produced.

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 Рік тому +2

      @@alexhajnal107 If they use Intel IP core , they surely have an IP license allowed. Because Intel still has business in China. There are Taiwan business that has its own X86 licenses from taken over the US X86 defuncted company , and they corporate with China in making their own X86 chip.

  • @neverletmego6414
    @neverletmego6414 Рік тому +31

    US: bans China from international space cooperation
    China: fine, I'll do it myself
    US: bans China from buying advanced chips
    China: fine, I'll do it myself

    • @ThePowerLover
      @ThePowerLover Рік тому +6

      Sure buddy.

    • @GenSecWPNM
      @GenSecWPNM Рік тому +1

      China has their own versions of every American stuffs. I wonder when will they their own version of P-hub.

    • @Ai-in-Ai
      @Ai-in-Ai Рік тому +1

      hey budy, it is really super hard to get the porn hub in China..lol@@GenSecWPNM

  • @eastyyx
    @eastyyx Рік тому +38

    Loved my Huawei P20 pro, it kept up with the competition for over 5 years. Never got slower, battery life stayed good and camera was amazing. I would've stayed with Huawei if they still had Google. For now I have switched to Samsung S23 Ultra, which is impressive.

    • @KuangTu
      @KuangTu Рік тому +8

      I hope one day Huawei can have android on their phones again. They are good phones, it's just almost unusable outside of China with their own system at the moment.

    • @mactep1
      @mactep1 Рік тому +14

      @@KuangTu They still have android, just their own flavor of it based on the android open source project, where they cant include google services due to sanctions, though there are workarounds for this if you really want to.

    • @KuangTu
      @KuangTu Рік тому +3

      ​@@mactep1 Thanks for the info. It's just very inconvenient or difficult for less tech savvy consumer to go through to get the phone with the google services they need.

    • @jesperburns
      @jesperburns Рік тому +3

      I stopped buying Chinese brands for geopolitical reasons.
      Are there Chinese parts in other phones? Sure.

    • @matneu27
      @matneu27 Рік тому +1

      Unfortunately it's not only Google, some China only phones also can't handle security systems for banking and /or can't play western streaming services like Netflix in full resolution iv heard in case of actual Huawei phones. At least unusable if you want more than taking good pictures and do some random calls.

  • @bbbl67
    @bbbl67 Рік тому +11

    Thanks, I was looking forward to your analysis on this. I knew a lot of it, did find out a few things I didn't know before too. So glad to see that my own internal analysis agreed with yours.

  • @Cadallin
    @Cadallin Рік тому +17

    Further, I have to ask, why on earth would China care what Qualcomm's patent lawyers think? All of the relevant companies involved are already sanctioned backwards, forwards, and sideways by the US government.
    And I have a highly unpopular opinion: IP in any technology that is "strategic" is already worthless. ASML is toast, because the USA decided their tech was strategic and forced them to not sell. So China has every incentive to tell their companies to copy or beat the tech, and the Chinese Government itself will have their back. ASML and Qualcomm can both be told to go pound sand. The USA will have about as much luck pushing this as they would have had suing the Soviet Union (or China for that matter) for "stealing" nuclear weapons tech.
    Physics is physics, and China can and is throwing more money and people at the problem than the West can collectively put together, so its over. There will be Chinese lithography machines and chip design tools, and the cat will be completely out of the bag.

    • @smoke5985
      @smoke5985 Рік тому

      precisely. this tech war on china is a fools errand and everyone but chinese citizens are going to lose out because of ill advised american policy

  • @Guywith2usernames
    @Guywith2usernames Рік тому +9

    Extremely strange to cite china talk, a project from the american defense industry bankrolled and US government backed thinktank Center for a New American Security. Going to start including raytheon ads and cia recruitment links in your videos?

    • @steelplasma256
      @steelplasma256 Рік тому +2

      Conspiracy theorist found!
      Make sure your tin foil hat doesn't fall off

    • @Guywith2usernames
      @Guywith2usernames Рік тому +1

      @@steelplasma256 CNAS doesn't hide it, you can find a list of their principal funders (northrop grumman, lockheed martin, raytheon, etc) and US government grants (over $500,000 from the US DoD in the last reported year) on their wikipedia page and list of donors.

    • @mod4rchive
      @mod4rchive Рік тому +5

      Its not that strange CIA funded articles are treated as trusted sources in Wikipedia too. Its just invisible to the english speaking audience

    • @480darkshadow
      @480darkshadow Рік тому

      Do you also not trust Chinese gov funded think tanks and news sites? Government provided info is superior to private ones. It is only primitive westerners that distrust their governments to such an extent.

  • @BradBo1140
    @BradBo1140 Рік тому +4

    Then what’s the point of using nanometers as a selling point if it doesn’t actually represent size.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 Рік тому +12

      marketing.
      the real measure is density. 9000s is said to be between TSMC 7 and 7+ nm. so behind but still pretty good.

    • @oggilein1
      @oggilein1 Рік тому +4

      there are some other videos on this channel (mainly the ones about EUV) that explain when and why the decoupling between name and actual size happened

    • @BradBo1140
      @BradBo1140 Рік тому

      @@mxn1948 ok, then what is the real nanometer measurements of the various chip transistor’s?

    • @OccultDemonCassette
      @OccultDemonCassette Рік тому +1

      ​@@BradBo11409000s is something closer to 5.8 or 6 nm I believe.

    • @BradBo1140
      @BradBo1140 Рік тому

      @@oggilein1 thanks, Ill take a look. Im sure its compicated.

  • @davidgunther8428
    @davidgunther8428 Рік тому +28

    Since the sanctions started I was wondering how much time this news would take and how much the eventual product would cost.
    One of your earlier videos made clear that EUV isn't required for 7nm. Maybe for 5nm, we'll see what happens.

    • @VaioletteWestover
      @VaioletteWestover Рік тому +21

      SMIC made a statement that DUV can certainly make 5nm at scale. I think the context is that 5nm with DUV was not possible with our previous understanding since no one was seriously trying to innovate on that front when EUV was available. I think it would be very interesting that a completely new branch of semiconductor engineering may emerge from China as a result of the U.S.'s blunderous sanctions.

    • @RustyWells2
      @RustyWells2 Рік тому +7

      ​@@VaioletteWestoverKeep drinking the cool aid lmfao 🤣

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 Рік тому +11

      Below 14NNM are more than enough to power modern Techs and military so yeah it's a huge win for china and chinese People Army..Hope they March on more for Getting their Hands in 5nn

    • @VaioletteWestover
      @VaioletteWestover Рік тому +12

      @@RustyWells2 Please rewatch the opening of the video. It was made for you~

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 Рік тому +9

      @@VaioletteWestover Why bother, he is drinking the cool aid

  • @irjensen
    @irjensen Рік тому

    4:31 Are repetitive structures easier to manufacture? What makes it easier?

  • @ashtonv418
    @ashtonv418 Рік тому

    +1 for your re-introduction of the ancient word "kerfluffle" in the first 30-seconds of the vid.

  • @reetankarbanerjee4394
    @reetankarbanerjee4394 Рік тому +8

    You said in South Korean vedio, the amount of equipment import(over 80%) and patent deal that they made while doing catch up to Japan. How big of a problem that part would be for China. And there is some, how much a delay lack of equipment import might cause??

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 Рік тому

      I suspect the equipment that goes into chinese semiconductors other than the lithography machines themselves is alot easier to substitute

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 Рік тому +2

      Not much i think...China Does have capacity to create its homemade things and like he said it will just be matter of weeks beofre usa impose another sanctions and china develops another way tonit😂😂😂

  • @asmael666
    @asmael666 Рік тому +21

    Reminder: Please make a video about the technical challenges of multi-patterning or, in general, aligning multiple exposures with each other...

  • @孫振新
    @孫振新 Рік тому

    Well said. Your audio sounded echoed initially, got better later.

  • @imno_xyz
    @imno_xyz Рік тому

    so that thing on the thumbnail is not an iPod

  • @ALZlper
    @ALZlper Рік тому +17

    I have a video idea: How does TSMC predict when their new nodes will be ready? It seems to me like an insane accuracy for something that is this complex. How correct are they usually?

    • @JameBlack
      @JameBlack Рік тому +1

      They dont predict they announce

    • @ALZlper
      @ALZlper Рік тому

      @@JameBlack But still, two years ahead?

    • @davidgunther8428
      @davidgunther8428 Рік тому

      Forecasting based on how the development is going and comparisons to previous process histories. I mean, they don't always get it right: 3N was too late to be used for the apple A16.

    • @GenSecWPNM
      @GenSecWPNM Рік тому +1

      India is already working on making 1 picometer chips for the world. Now! that's marvelous.

    • @steveskyyz
      @steveskyyz Рік тому

      you might be on to somthing there , because they might be even lying to us the nanometres all along, they might be just overclocking chips. i wonder how they predict too.

  • @jonpattison
    @jonpattison Рік тому +40

    Excellent information! I like your disclaimers at the beginning. Thanks!

  • @jay23cr
    @jay23cr Рік тому +3

    The insidiousness of thinking NO ONE can do it without you or that they need your permission to do something. Trying to block others from succeeding and then getting shocked when, against all odds, they succeed on their own, without any need of your help and in fact, despite your best efforts to make them fail…
    That in every day life we call a HATER!

  • @flashgameking
    @flashgameking Рік тому

    SMIC may have helped Huawei during the production process, but the 9000S is definitely not made by SMIC. These large-scale high-end equipment or IDEs will send coordinates and part of the production data to the parent company during production.

  • @berndkemmereit8252
    @berndkemmereit8252 Рік тому +2

    Huawai is almost gone from phone shops in Europe, China technology is done in the west, Spy software and no Google are the main reasons, no matter how good the technical specs are

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 Рік тому +1

      If I were you I'd worry more about Apple being gone from phone shops in China.
      And after you're done worrying about that, worry about how many phones will still be in shops in Europe after China puts a single missile into TSMC

    • @berndkemmereit8252
      @berndkemmereit8252 Рік тому

      @@vlhc4642 jaysus what di you smoke this morning. I don't by Apple so I couldn't care less. Even if they put a missle in TSMC, I have currently a Phone, I don't need a new one for at least 5 years, and by then all the new TSMC fabriks in Europe and US will be ready anyway.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 Рік тому +1

      @@berndkemmereit8252 Heh, are you under the impression those TSMC fabs in Europe or US can function without TSMC in Taiwan? Or that their capacity is even remotely close to relevant for anything other than military use?
      When China plays their sanction card, the entire western technology industry gets annihilated, period.

  • @diegoantoniorosariopalomin9979
    @diegoantoniorosariopalomin9979 Рік тому +37

    Huawei designed both cpu Cores and GPU cores for this phone. Later down the líne they could license the GPUs for chinese graphics cards

    • @WaterZer0
      @WaterZer0 Рік тому +7

      Probably won't impact the gaming market, but they can definitely use em for AI. I'm assuming that's what you had in mind here as the US would just ban the import of those if they were a threat to current companies.

    • @Sammyli99
      @Sammyli99 Рік тому +6

      bye bye Nivada.

    • @williamyf
      @williamyf Рік тому +5

      Nah, most likely licensed the IP from PowerVR, like Innosilicon and MooreThreads did with their "Chinese Graphics Cards" a while ago.
      Still, no small feat from Huawei to get that iGPU stack working.

    • @diegoantoniorosariopalomin9979
      @diegoantoniorosariopalomin9979 Рік тому +7

      ​@@williamyfAs far as we know, this particular GPU was designed by Huawei

    • @williamyf
      @williamyf Рік тому

      @@diegoantoniorosariopalomin9979 tranquilo papaaá, tan solo deja que pase un tiempito y veras... fuerte a puya a que ese GPU es, bien sea PowerVR, o una variacion de Mali pichada con esterioides por parte de Huawei....

  • @elchippe
    @elchippe Рік тому +38

    Mr. Jordan is absolutely wrong and a bigger surprise than the Kirin SOC is in store.

    • @livedem0
      @livedem0 Рік тому +2

      EUV low rate production trial in 2024 is what I heard from sdf

    • @elchippe
      @elchippe Рік тому

      @@livedem0 what is sdf?

    • @PhiloSurfer
      @PhiloSurfer Рік тому

      @@elchippe some dumb fella

    • @xBlackWind
      @xBlackWind Рік тому

      ​@@livedem0Prototype by 2024, not production

  • @NonsenseChatGPT
    @NonsenseChatGPT Рік тому +14

    The last huawei phone consist of less than 30% of home made part and 0 control over its OS… but now it’s 90% and they own their OS in 3 years… wonder which smart aleck help to push them

    • @danosdotnl
      @danosdotnl Рік тому +3

      necessity, motivation and culture?

    • @Aistlander
      @Aistlander Рік тому

      A lot of copy-paste was used

    • @danosdotnl
      @danosdotnl Рік тому

      That is basically the definition of mass production? I suggest you all look into technological developments, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2000 and 5000 years ago. This is just another cycle, cycle yes.

  • @you2be839
    @you2be839 Рік тому +2

    The Kitty 9000S sure seems to purr quite nicely!...

  • @Kenbomp
    @Kenbomp Рік тому +1

    Question is can they meet the demand and be profitable. And can they convince to maintain progress. They are most likely eating the costs.

    • @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh
      @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh Рік тому

      Nope😂

    • @haiwang2857
      @haiwang2857 Рік тому

      Of course it can be profitable. Huawei's new 5G mobile phones can sell for US$100 billion within a year. China's market is huge.

  • @nexusyang4832
    @nexusyang4832 Рік тому +14

    3:53 - I wasn’t surprised. Innovation like life will find a way. It’s just a matter of time.

  • @catonpillow
    @catonpillow Рік тому +13

    Every single attempt of the U$ to curb Сhina's progress and development has not only failed but also massively backfired. In fact, the more the U$ is trying to contain Сhina, the stronger, more resilient and self-sufficient Сhina is becoming. By placing such restrictions on the Сhinese companies, as well as on its own companies to do business with Сhina, the U$ has given all the incentives for Сhina to accelerate its own innovation. After such restrictions/bans went into effect, China has build the first reactor to ever use the third-generation nuclear power technology, became the world leader in 5G, photovoltaics, drone, fintech and EV(cars and batteries) sectors, came at the forefront of quantum computing, created their BeiDou Navigation Satellite System, developed its homemade Sunway TaihuLight supercomputer chips, build the Tiangong Space Station, sent a rover on the dark side of the Moon and on Mars etc. etc. etc. As the saying goes, what doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.

    • @VaioletteWestover
      @VaioletteWestover Рік тому

      At this point the Chinese should beg the US to continue the sanctions permanently. xD

  • @jkuang
    @jkuang Рік тому +3

    Update: it might be 5nm chips. On 9/25, Huawei released a system software displays Huawei Mate 60 Pro specs. And it shows 5nm chip set in the system status. But Huawei is quiet about it. No official confirmation. It creates a lot of buzz last week. Let's see how it plays out in coming days.
    If it is really 5nm, that means China is ON PAR with Western chip technology. The so called 3nm chip that Apple claims to use for iPhone 15 is only using 3nm technology for a small portion of the chip. 5nm chip is the really leading-edge production at scale.

    • @strigoiu13
      @strigoiu13 Рік тому +1

      i think it is a 0nm chip. how about that :))

  • @toiletfx5679
    @toiletfx5679 Рік тому +1

    Impressive that they managed to accomplish this in the first place, however as we have learned from intel, you can only squeze so much performance out of the same process node so it's only a matter of time until they can't push their silicon any further without EUV. Also isn't the Mate 60 / pro notorious for overheating while not even beeing in use?
    Also only time will tell how the realestate collapse going on in china is gonna affect the domestic semiconductor industry since many semiconductor manufacturers in china are relying on funds from the ccp to keep expanding.

    • @MrSpiritmonger
      @MrSpiritmonger Рік тому

      I am using a Mate 60 pro now, no overheating issues. And you can go down to 5nm with DUV lithography, there is no magic cut off.

    • @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh
      @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh Рік тому

      I thought overheating was iPhone 15 issue ?

    • @toiletfx5679
      @toiletfx5679 Рік тому

      @@ScoobieDoo-zy1rh Really? I heard that the new Iphones get warm pretty fast but I never heard anything about overheating. Well now that I think about it, it wouldn't be Apple's first time creating a product that overheats.

    • @smoke5985
      @smoke5985 Рік тому

      @@toiletfx5679 every iphone ive owned has had overheating problems

  • @esterparis1190
    @esterparis1190 6 місяців тому

    You never indicate WHO supplies the photoresists for engraving.

  • @yoshyoka
    @yoshyoka Рік тому +4

    Forgive me the ignorance, but using DUV does not intail that you have to use double patterning at every step and thus having your chips taking longer and being way more expensive? Or is the higher yield enough to compensate for it?

    • @lubricustheslippery5028
      @lubricustheslippery5028 Рік тому

      It's definitely pros and cons with DUV and EUV. Double patterning for DUV. Then the EUV machines is very expensive and probably also very expensive to run. The EUV will probably win out the smaller the process gets.
      So smaller cheaper and slower machines or bigger more expensive and faster machines.

    • @yoshyoka
      @yoshyoka Рік тому

      @dalangwudalang2596 Last I checked (today) all Chinese fabs are still using ASML units. Not only that, what you say makes no sense: you cannot scale up a litography machine and still print the same wafers.

    • @nickl5658
      @nickl5658 Рік тому +1

      @@yoshyoka What the guy is saying is China has cracked the EUV light source issue. Rather than irradiating tin droplets with high-energy CO2-laser to generate EUV light, the chinese are using a synchrotron to generate the co-laminar EUV light. They intend to build a facility that runs multiple lithography machines (hence factory) using the EUV light generated by a 0.5km to 1km snchroton (hence giant).

    • @yoshyoka
      @yoshyoka Рік тому

      @@nickl5658 Well, no, that is not what he is saying at all, at least, it was not mentioned anywhere in the video.

  • @888YangJi
    @888YangJi Рік тому +3

    How did Huawei survived 6 rounds of US sanctions and not die? Is huawei just too powerful? Or is US not as powerful as it claims?

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 Рік тому

      US was going at a half measure, if they restricted all lithography machine beyond 90nm, all epitaxy, photoresist, etc it could work. However, LAM research, Intel, Applied Materials all have business in China. Last month Intel just opened some AI center in China. Given the enormous pressure USG put on ASML to ban EUV, a very extensive/serious restrictions on chip making tools is very difficult. But yeah, Huawei is too resilient, a half measure like that would have crippled any companies (which I think USG was hoping to happen)

    • @Rex-ww4cw
      @Rex-ww4cw Рік тому

      You're talking about a company where 80% of it's employee are scientists and engineers.

    • @projecttitanium-slowishdriver
      @projecttitanium-slowishdriver Рік тому

      The Chinese goverment pumps money, it keeps the company floating

  • @ryanj.3102
    @ryanj.3102 Рік тому +26

    I find it extremely troubling that one nation is going out of their way to ensure they put a metal rod in the spokes of a bicycle of another country to cripple them all under the guise of national security. I certainly hope that China can develop in house the entire infrastructure for chip manufacturing within the next decade or two and to surpass north america.

    • @RustyWells2
      @RustyWells2 Рік тому +4

      😂

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 Рік тому

      Not as troubling as Afghanistan or Iraq, which did not really trouble most people. So, not really troubling at all.

    • @ghosthunter0950
      @ghosthunter0950 Рік тому

      Tell that to Taiwan that china keeps harassing.
      Their current official map of china includes Taiwan.

  • @combat.wombat
    @combat.wombat Рік тому +1

    Why no details about the chips performance vs the 5nm chip on the old phones or vs other 7nm phone chips?

  • @Grak70
    @Grak70 Рік тому

    Aside from not knowing the yield, not knowing the cost is just as important. MP lithography for layers that should use EUV is stupidly expensive.

  • @DeepLyricist
    @DeepLyricist Рік тому +4

    "whole thing has turned into a real kerfuffle" you're the first person I think I've ever heard actually say that word out loud

  • @stevenng5238
    @stevenng5238 Рік тому +16

    Thank you Jon for another enlightening video. About a year ago, you predicted that SMIC will come up with a 7n+ 2 chip. As we all know by now, your prediction has come to pass, and you are vindicated absolutely. Please keep up the good work. Take care.

  • @ryanb1659
    @ryanb1659 Рік тому +8

    This is still unclear to me: did SMIC use existing DUV tech from ASML for the 7nm node, or have they used some new unknown method. Or does nobody know the answer to this?

    • @UnChannelDuVulpineX
      @UnChannelDuVulpineX Рік тому

      The chips are old stock, from before the US sanctions. This ccp-written article is a lie.

    • @lharsay
      @lharsay Рік тому

      Thay bought DUV from ASML because it won't be sanctioned until 2024.

    • @directxxxx71
      @directxxxx71 Рік тому

      It's still a mystery

    • @hi4806
      @hi4806 Рік тому

      Duv made by China itself is said to have been tested, and it is also possible that smic has already used it. No one knows.

    • @ryanb1659
      @ryanb1659 Рік тому

      Xinnie the Pooh knows

  • @Ateshtesh
    @Ateshtesh Рік тому +1

    My gosh! now Huawei release a notebook with 5nm chips... it is their own one, or the one made by TSMC?

    • @afuyan
      @afuyan 7 місяців тому

      The Kirin 9000E is an old stock from TSMC, it was designed for tablet but if they released into phone and tablet then it will compete to their own 7nm chips so they repurpose that for laptop. The new chips are Kirin 9000S and Kirin 9010. There are also few Kirin 900/800 midrange series.

  • @tstager1978
    @tstager1978 Рік тому +2

    China might get to 5nm but euv is required after that. They can't recreate euv.

    • @douginorlando6260
      @douginorlando6260 Рік тому

      They might skip euv and go straight to direct write on wafer with massively parallel e-beam technology (1 e-beam per die, or 1 per 9 die to leave more space between beams).

    • @tstager1978
      @tstager1978 Рік тому

      @@douginorlando6260 There are way too many obstacles to over come for ebeam. It will work one day but not this decade or even the next.

  • @py8554
    @py8554 Рік тому +6

    Mater artium necessitas
    Necessity is the mother of invention
    需要乃發明之母