These comments are largely very VERY cold takes of people on copium. The specialists thing looks very cringe, like Battlefield 2042. A game “just” working should be the bare minimum and not something to be cheered on like an achievement. People lowered their game standards so much. It’s like swiping right on Tinder on someone who is not at all your type, because you have been swiping all week and you are getting beyond desperate
People's standards are more fried than their attention span lmao. People here heard me say "the game is okay" and took it as if I cursed their entire family
@ it’s because they really put all their hope and hurt feelings after Battlefield 2042 and Battlefield 5 into cheering this game on. Now that it has been releases as a 2042 clone they just have to fight any opinion which doesn’t confirm their bias. Really fighting through those tears telling themselves “no, this is a good game! A Battlefield killer!”
thanks so much for this so hard to come by just a "review for casuals" type of thing without that bias there was a lot more hype than what it looks like I also hate the "Cant talk in all chat", I feel like that should be my choice, most likely I will opt out of all chat but I dont like how there is just no option I cant remember what game it is but the game basically Defaults you to not be able to talk in All chat, which is probably League of Legends and then will warn you when you try to enable it just seems like a chill battlefield game
@@wisprs_gaming yeah no problem! I hate the all chat thing too. I know bf2042 has it off by default and so did xdefiant. 2 games with great results lol. But yeah just a chill battlefield game for the most part
Extraction IS still multiplayer. It's just a different kind of multiplayer. Think of the PvP like DOTA2 or LoL. The bots are mainly there to engage you, and players engage you based on how you engage the bots. It's really fun!
Yeah I'm down to try out the extraction mode. I've never played any games with that mode so it would definitely be different. I mainly included that statement because the majority of people advertising the game don't mention the extraction lol
Terrible take, the game is free, not P2W, competent anti cheat, that alone makes it a fantastic game when u consider the gaming market, grow up LOL. Game looks good, its optimized, no lag, don't know what else do these entitled zoomers want nowdays. CoD=P2W garbo full of cheaters, Tarkov=P2W garbo full of cheaters, PUBG= full of cheaters, Battlefield=decent although not free. Consider what's out there and tell me which game offers any similar value outside maybe super sweaty games like Counter strike, but which shooters that are free are actually casual friendly?
Please tell me where in this video I said the game was bad. I keep getting comments from people who are the reason people put ads in the first 30 seconds of the video acting like I just took a dump on their bowl of cereal lmao. I never said it was P2W. The game is absolutely not optimized. Multiple people complain about low fps or stutters throughout. If you're complaining so much about cheaters in every game I think that says something about you than the game. Battlefield goes on sale at least once a month for less than $5. I just bought the entire franchise post bfbc2 for less than $12. But fine, you want free. Here's a list Apex legends Marvel Rivals Destiny 2 The finals Warzone Overwatch Enlisted Halo infinite Planetside 2 Warframe Warface Spectre divide Tf2 Valorant Ironsight Black Squad World War 3 No more room in hell There's literally thousands of games that are free and fun. This is just another one in the pile. Again, I never said the game was bad. At the end I literally say it'll be a fun game to load up and play. But sure, it's a terrible take because I said the game was okay
I have. And I agree, games sucking at launch is way too common. It's good that it works but I feel like we shouldn't give it so much leeway just because of that. I agree it's something to look forward to but paid content creators are telling everyone that it is really good. "Delta Force is the FPS Game We Needed" - Handler "Delta Force has got me HOOKED" - Tomographic "The Delta Force Game is now the biggest Competitor" - OperatorDrewski "Battlefield finally has some good competition" - Jackfrags etc. People who are getting paid by the devs of this game are calling this game amazing. I wanted to share what the actual experience is like for a casual gamer who isn't getting paid to play this game is like.
I don't think anyone has said it's the next "best game since sliced bread". I haven't seen anyone say it's that good. I've seen people say it's highly derivative of battlefield but nonetheless it's something to look forward to because it has a large player base rn and it's free to play
I have never touched the multiplayer of Battlefield or CoD in my life and I only started playing Delta Force because 2 of my friends started playing it. I am absolute shit when it comes to PvP, especially when it comes to fast PvP shooters (average 8 to 15 kills per match.) BUT I have fun and I think that's what counts most. I don't care if it tries to copy any game, as long as it's not P2W (like the extraction mode, which I don't play for that reason) and I have fun, that's enough for me.
Oh so you're talking about the warfare mode... This game is all about extraction bro, it's 100% the best extraction shooter up there with tarkov and ABI ... Warfare is just for the battlefield widows
Warfare feels like you’re in a lobby with bots. Everyone bunches up, there’s no coordination, there’s no strategy, just group up and die. Spam wall hacks and smoke from 64 players is stupid.
So it's not good because it moderates chat, has classes defined by a persona, and has microtransactions as a F2P game? I don't agree with that take. More time is spent seeing what's similar to BF than what's seeing what's interesting about DF. It feels like your mind was made up before even trying the game. And that's okay. Just didn't find the explanation to be grounded.
I said it's "Just ok" didn't say it isn't good. Moderates chat puts it loosely. If they censor "Gtfo" that's just sad. Not being able to talk in an all chat makes games feel hollow. Might as well be playing against bots on console at that point. Classes defined by a persona suck because it's a cheap way to sell skins. More time is spent seeing what's similar to BF because 50% of videos by sponsored creators are talking about how it's the next Battlefield or how it's about time that Battlefield has some competition. Make a Battlefield clone, get compared to Battlefield.
I don't really see the problem with SBMM. If youve been playing the game for 18 minutes and are killing it that hard than you should be playing against much better players. The only people that would call that a problem are cowards that only want to play against those who will not give them any challlange. If you only want to play on easy mode go play something with just bots.
@@NO-MAD-CLAD in theory it sounds like a good idea. In practice it's a terrible experience. Yes, if you go 30-0 in your first match you should be put up against better players. However, in all cases of sbmm, there's hardly anything in between 0 and 100. In theory, if you're level 1, stomping other level 1s, you should be against maybe level 10s, then level 20s. In practice however, you're put up against level 150s and doing bad in those games not only make the game horribly un fun, but they don't put you back to where you belong. You stay there pretty much permanently. The people who call that a problem are people who are sick of non location based matchmaking. There used to be a time when you loaded up a game and just the nearest 12 people got into a lobby regardless of skill. It was a fun time, sometimes you got stomped sometimes you stomped sometimes it was a close game. It was a good time that is getting removed from modern gaming for no reason other than to get abused and exploited by content creators farming clips.
See now I don't wanna say that because that's just an ignorant thing to say. We could say every game is a data mining game. How often have we received an ad for a game that's similar to what we play? I could say that since it's developed by TiMi studio which is a subsidiary of Tencent Games that I don't trust them to not be monetization heavy but just dumbing it down to "Chinese data mine game" doesn't add much to the conversation.
These comments are largely very VERY cold takes of people on copium. The specialists thing looks very cringe, like Battlefield 2042. A game “just” working should be the bare minimum and not something to be cheered on like an achievement.
People lowered their game standards so much. It’s like swiping right on Tinder on someone who is not at all your type, because you have been swiping all week and you are getting beyond desperate
People's standards are more fried than their attention span lmao. People here heard me say "the game is okay" and took it as if I cursed their entire family
@ it’s because they really put all their hope and hurt feelings after Battlefield 2042 and Battlefield 5 into cheering this game on. Now that it has been releases as a 2042 clone they just have to fight any opinion which doesn’t confirm their bias.
Really fighting through those tears telling themselves “no, this is a good game! A Battlefield killer!”
1:16 shark teeth
Gotta love sucky lighting
thanks so much for this
so hard to come by just a "review for casuals" type of thing without that bias
there was a lot more hype than what it looks like
I also hate the "Cant talk in all chat", I feel like that should be my choice, most likely I will opt out of all chat but I dont like how there is just no option
I cant remember what game it is but the game basically Defaults you to not be able to talk in All chat, which is probably League of Legends and then will warn you when you try to enable it
just seems like a chill battlefield game
@@wisprs_gaming yeah no problem! I hate the all chat thing too. I know bf2042 has it off by default and so did xdefiant. 2 games with great results lol. But yeah just a chill battlefield game for the most part
Extraction IS still multiplayer. It's just a different kind of multiplayer.
Think of the PvP like DOTA2 or LoL. The bots are mainly there to engage you, and players engage you based on how you engage the bots. It's really fun!
Yeah I'm down to try out the extraction mode. I've never played any games with that mode so it would definitely be different. I mainly included that statement because the majority of people advertising the game don't mention the extraction lol
Terrible take, the game is free, not P2W, competent anti cheat, that alone makes it a fantastic game when u consider the gaming market, grow up LOL. Game looks good, its optimized, no lag, don't know what else do these entitled zoomers want nowdays. CoD=P2W garbo full of cheaters, Tarkov=P2W garbo full of cheaters, PUBG= full of cheaters, Battlefield=decent although not free. Consider what's out there and tell me which game offers any similar value outside maybe super sweaty games like Counter strike, but which shooters that are free are actually casual friendly?
Please tell me where in this video I said the game was bad. I keep getting comments from people who are the reason people put ads in the first 30 seconds of the video acting like I just took a dump on their bowl of cereal lmao.
I never said it was P2W. The game is absolutely not optimized. Multiple people complain about low fps or stutters throughout. If you're complaining so much about cheaters in every game I think that says something about you than the game.
Battlefield goes on sale at least once a month for less than $5. I just bought the entire franchise post bfbc2 for less than $12. But fine, you want free. Here's a list
Apex legends
Marvel Rivals
Destiny 2
The finals
Warzone
Overwatch
Enlisted
Halo infinite
Planetside 2
Warframe
Warface
Spectre divide
Tf2
Valorant
Ironsight
Black Squad
World War 3
No more room in hell
There's literally thousands of games that are free and fun. This is just another one in the pile. Again, I never said the game was bad. At the end I literally say it'll be a fun game to load up and play. But sure, it's a terrible take because I said the game was okay
have you played games lately? of course people are excited about a multiplayer shooter that works on launch
I have. And I agree, games sucking at launch is way too common. It's good that it works but I feel like we shouldn't give it so much leeway just because of that.
I agree it's something to look forward to but paid content creators are telling everyone that it is really good. "Delta Force is the FPS Game We Needed" - Handler "Delta Force has got me HOOKED" - Tomographic "The Delta Force Game is now the biggest Competitor" - OperatorDrewski "Battlefield finally has some good competition" - Jackfrags etc.
People who are getting paid by the devs of this game are calling this game amazing. I wanted to share what the actual experience is like for a casual gamer who isn't getting paid to play this game is like.
I don't think anyone has said it's the next "best game since sliced bread". I haven't seen anyone say it's that good. I've seen people say it's highly derivative of battlefield but nonetheless it's something to look forward to because it has a large player base rn and it's free to play
I have never touched the multiplayer of Battlefield or CoD in my life and I only started playing Delta Force because 2 of my friends started playing it.
I am absolute shit when it comes to PvP, especially when it comes to fast PvP shooters (average 8 to 15 kills per match.) BUT I have fun and I think that's what counts most.
I don't care if it tries to copy any game, as long as it's not P2W (like the extraction mode, which I don't play for that reason) and I have fun, that's enough for me.
Yeah I mean really that's all that matters is whether or not it's fun. I bet it's way more fun with friends too
The game is great. Just wish the health was reduced by 20%
Sometimes for enemies it's like I can shoot 50 bullets and only get hit markers. Then I get sprayed down through smoke 3 bullets from an lmg like what
You have 2 of the same optics why? And a flashlight playing outside in day time. Why?
I only had 2 optics unlocked. You can't change the attachments until you're out of the game so I can't take the flashlight off.
Oh so you're talking about the warfare mode... This game is all about extraction bro, it's 100% the best extraction shooter up there with tarkov and ABI ... Warfare is just for the battlefield widows
@@DiselSun maybe I'll have to give the extraction mode a try
2042 from TEMU, HOT THRASH... NO bf KILLER. nICE VIDEO BRO, CONTENT CREATORS ARE JUST SHILLS
@@misterwubz3757 It does get a little old hearing big names saying how good this game is while pocketing 14k lol
dawg did you play 2042? it is very much temu battlefield man
Warfare feels like you’re in a lobby with bots. Everyone bunches up, there’s no coordination, there’s no strategy, just group up and die. Spam wall hacks and smoke from 64 players is stupid.
So it's not good because it moderates chat, has classes defined by a persona, and has microtransactions as a F2P game? I don't agree with that take. More time is spent seeing what's similar to BF than what's seeing what's interesting about DF. It feels like your mind was made up before even trying the game. And that's okay. Just didn't find the explanation to be grounded.
I said it's "Just ok" didn't say it isn't good.
Moderates chat puts it loosely. If they censor "Gtfo" that's just sad. Not being able to talk in an all chat makes games feel hollow. Might as well be playing against bots on console at that point.
Classes defined by a persona suck because it's a cheap way to sell skins.
More time is spent seeing what's similar to BF because 50% of videos by sponsored creators are talking about how it's the next Battlefield or how it's about time that Battlefield has some competition. Make a Battlefield clone, get compared to Battlefield.
The game is cool,but solo - duo gameplay is terrible,they need to make solo mode.
You mean like in extraction mode?
I don't really see the problem with SBMM. If youve been playing the game for 18 minutes and are killing it that hard than you should be playing against much better players. The only people that would call that a problem are cowards that only want to play against those who will not give them any challlange. If you only want to play on easy mode go play something with just bots.
@@NO-MAD-CLAD in theory it sounds like a good idea. In practice it's a terrible experience. Yes, if you go 30-0 in your first match you should be put up against better players. However, in all cases of sbmm, there's hardly anything in between 0 and 100. In theory, if you're level 1, stomping other level 1s, you should be against maybe level 10s, then level 20s. In practice however, you're put up against level 150s and doing bad in those games not only make the game horribly un fun, but they don't put you back to where you belong. You stay there pretty much permanently.
The people who call that a problem are people who are sick of non location based matchmaking. There used to be a time when you loaded up a game and just the nearest 12 people got into a lobby regardless of skill. It was a fun time, sometimes you got stomped sometimes you stomped sometimes it was a close game. It was a good time that is getting removed from modern gaming for no reason other than to get abused and exploited by content creators farming clips.
You just want to be different my friend and want attention 😂😂
Pfft if that's what you think. A guy making a vid on a game saying it's fine is different and attention seeking lmao thanks for the comment
another chinese data mine game
See now I don't wanna say that because that's just an ignorant thing to say. We could say every game is a data mining game. How often have we received an ad for a game that's similar to what we play?
I could say that since it's developed by TiMi studio which is a subsidiary of Tencent Games that I don't trust them to not be monetization heavy but just dumbing it down to "Chinese data mine game" doesn't add much to the conversation.