The Steps of a Systematic Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @educationandtravelbsectors3045
    @educationandtravelbsectors3045 3 роки тому +18

    Simplicity at its best. Thanks to make it so simple and understandable.

  • @zahidhussain7136
    @zahidhussain7136 10 місяців тому

    very well explained in short time. great and thank you for making such kind of videos.

  • @thesocialintercourse8068
    @thesocialintercourse8068 5 років тому +6

    Plz made a video on meta analysis too... I have a exam on 22 nd Friday... Nov, 2019

  • @christineroa6120
    @christineroa6120 3 роки тому +3

    May I ask what is the research instrument when I rely on internet searches?

  • @janey3292
    @janey3292 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks for this. What is your perspective on a single person attemtping to do a systematic review, as opposed to a team with double coding, etc?

    • @kingsanalytics2193
      @kingsanalytics2193 2 роки тому +1

      For a large study, this may pose a challenge. However, if you have a firm understanding of the PRISMA you developed, then one can do it alone, irrespective of study size.

    • @Fletchery29
      @Fletchery29 Місяць тому

      A systematic review is a defined study design, meaning a particular methodology should be followed when completing a review. According to the Cochrane Collaboration, the leading evidence synthesis experts, a review must be completed by a team of researchers. A review completed by a single person is not a systematic review and should not be named or published as such. A single-person review would be considered a systematized review (one where methodological cuts were taken).
      If you have questions about completing a systematic review, you should contact an academic librarian, medical librarian, or methodological expert.

  • @thulanizwane1409
    @thulanizwane1409 4 роки тому +5

    Really helpful. Thanks a million

  • @irsh941988
    @irsh941988 2 роки тому +2

    Most journals do not provide the full texts of articles. What to do then ?

    • @cowboycatranch
      @cowboycatranch Рік тому

      That is never a reason to exclude articles. Get in touch with a librarian at a university nearby. I bet they would be happy to help you.

  • @galdossari3012
    @galdossari3012 3 роки тому +6

    My problem is in analyzing & synthesizing data 😔🥺

  • @StaryzHelios
    @StaryzHelios 4 роки тому +8

    TQS for making this vid, i ask my lecturer, fail to explain what is systematic question. super frust. I pay them for nthing

  • @Tobystoysneca
    @Tobystoysneca 3 роки тому +1

    Anyone know a scientific method attached to this? Ie gathering data to display proof of a theory

  • @joybaker9164
    @joybaker9164 5 років тому +2

    Really helpful video

  • @alkhansasalih7374
    @alkhansasalih7374 2 місяці тому

    Reliability is it important step in systemic review or not?, if yes what the method?

  • @mariamyacoub3400
    @mariamyacoub3400 3 роки тому

    Thanks so much 😍
    It's really helpful 🌹

    • @emilycarter8922
      @emilycarter8922 2 роки тому

      You might want to check this out ua-cam.com/video/y6lgxTomWdM/v-deo.html

  • @meshalbassam4895
    @meshalbassam4895 4 місяці тому

    That's great 👏🏼👏🏼

  • @joiejay141
    @joiejay141 3 роки тому

    Really helpful. Thank you.

  • @missbhoir
    @missbhoir 2 роки тому

    A systematic review must contain Meta analysis? Can be it still be called a systematic review if Meta analysis is not conducted?

    • @jenniferluck6794
      @jenniferluck6794 2 роки тому

      I think if you do a qualitative systematic review , you don't need a meta analysis

    • @missbhoir
      @missbhoir 2 роки тому

      @@jenniferluck6794 that is if using only qualitative research papers, meta analysis is not needed ?

    • @sherryhere8498
      @sherryhere8498 2 роки тому +1

      I think this will answer your question:
      "All meta analyses are systematic reviews, but all systematic reviews are not meta analyses".

  • @sstutorials2956
    @sstutorials2956 4 роки тому +1

    It was very helpful

  • @M-Bella-Trix
    @M-Bella-Trix 4 роки тому

    Is it the same as systematic literature review?

    • @xyzdpd
      @xyzdpd 4 роки тому +1

      You should watch this for systematic literature review, it was very helpful for me! ua-cam.com/video/gAEDxKWSGTs/v-deo.html

    • @laxmanbisht2638
      @laxmanbisht2638 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah. Systematic reveiw is the reviewing of literature in scientific manner.

  • @yohannestekalegn6740
    @yohannestekalegn6740 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @planet_A2Z
    @planet_A2Z 2 роки тому

    Very informative

  •  4 роки тому

    Awesome!

  • @manishkc133
    @manishkc133 6 років тому +2

    awesum

  • @ramyamurugan489
    @ramyamurugan489 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @ajitsamaddar7158
    @ajitsamaddar7158 Рік тому

    90th and

  • @ebenezersam5040
    @ebenezersam5040 3 роки тому

    The lacking accountant biosynthetically warm because sphere acutely fool pro a quick plier. ill-informed, hot huge balinese

  • @shaneatkinson8933
    @shaneatkinson8933 3 роки тому

    i hate this shit i failed lol

  • @md.zahidhassan3208
    @md.zahidhassan3208 2 роки тому

    thank you

  • @Dentherapy
    @Dentherapy 6 місяців тому

    Thanks