Mac Studio vs 16" MacBook Pro | M1 Ultra vs M1 Max
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 бер 2022
- If you've been wondering how the top-end Mac Studio compares to the highest-end MacBook Pro, look no further, because we have a real-world usage comparison that doesn't rely solely on benchmarks. Benchmarks do not always paint the true picture of what's going on with each machine. The TLDR of all is that most people will be more than okay with the M1 Max but there are some time saving benefits to the M1 Ultra that do show up in "real world" tests.
Read more - www.macrumors.com/2022/03/25/...
Under desk shelf for MacBook - amzn.to/3tH52Xq
Follow MacRumors -linktr.ee/macrumors
Follow Dan - linktr.ee/danbarbera
#macstudio #m1ultra #m1max - Наука та технологія
Few people have been asking about the under desk shelf mount. Put link in description!
Like the desk shelf mount, but also...what's the desk you've got it attached to? Looks like a sit/stand desk. Love the wood top!
Leg ever come in contact with it?
Thank you! Your workflow and real time examples of your video exports answered the real questions I had. Excellent video!
Thanks for a grounded, real-world Mac Studio assessment! … I went with the base model M1 Max Mac Studio and bumped up storage to 1 TB. I wanted a desktop solution to replace my i7 Mac mini, and I really, REALLY wanted a system that could offer butter-smooth video editing with several clips and effects. Dropped frames that prevent me from previewing a transition is beyond frustrating. I mulled the purchase decision for a day after the March event concluded, so I’m still waiting for it.
beautiful and genuine review! Finally, thanks so much guys for sharing.
Finally - someone who is rationalizing right-size power requirements. I think you answered my question; if the 16" MBP is still relevant as it relates to a workstation for the A&E industry. Thank you.
Honest and genuine review and advice, love your video
Good vid. I have a “base computer” at work that my whole company revolves around, and that will be the Mac Studio, while my Macbook Pro is my out-of-office workhorse that I couldn’t do without. And I have an M1 Mac Mini as a backup machine for when the laptop is getting repaired, if that ever happens.
You also have to consider further optimisations will be applied to native apps.
Great video, but what's the widescreen display shown at 15 seconds int?
(As the 27-in iMac has gone walkabout I'm currently considering a split solution using a widescreen in conjunction with either a Macbook Pro or a Mac Mini)
Do you connect the Studio Display directly to the Macbook Pro or the OWC dock and have noticed a quality difference?
GREAT COMPARISON!!!
Where did you get the stand for the iPad and the one for iPod in the background ?! I need to know please
Thank you. I knew this video wasn't only going to be benchmarks.
Any differences between Max and Ultra for Lightroom/Photoshop use?
Can the Mac Studio function in a hybrid workforce? As an older adult I’m not particularly comfortable with MBP. I’m considering base Max Studio and connecting to a monitor at work/home.
Thanks for the video. The only upgrade that seems reasonable over the base Studio, is the 32 core GPU for another $200. Unless you absolutely need more RAM or Storage, just add the extra GPU cores and enjoy the faster processing/rendering power. Otherwise, There is plenty of fast RAM, and storage is large enough to install Apps and data. Because you can't upgrade the storage easily, it is better to keep important data and backups on external storage or NAS. I do believe the Studio in total is a modular system in a datacenter scenario; can't wait to see how people use it that way. Cheers everyone!!!
@macrumors you show a lot of your Final pro podcast screen with lots of things going on /cuts and stuff. Is there a video where you explain your workflow or do you recommend one?
My videos often involve playing 6 videos on timeline simultaneously (for reference, check the video on my homepage) Is M1 Max powerful enough to playback such timelines without frame drops? THANKS in advance
What puts the Ultra ahead is the ProRes encoding. You can optimize your sourcematerial ALOT faster which then speeds up everything down the workflow!
I’d like to see more people compare only the M1 Max in the 2 different form factors. How does the 24 and 32 core GPUs perform differently in the MacBook vs the Mac Studio real world.
Check the max tech channel. They have almost identical results.
This video is important, not just for what it says, but for what it does not say. Barely mentioned is the M1Pro MacBook Pro. Currently, Apple offers the M1Pro in a laptop form factor only. There are no M1Pro desktop machines. Apple caters to the consumer desktop market with M1-equipped Mac Mini and iMac. For the dedicated professional/industrial market, Apple offers M1Max- and M1Ultra-equipped Mac Studio. But the only "prosumer" space hardware with an M1Pro on board is the MacBook Pro. No desktop machines. That's quite a gaping hole in Apple's product lineup, no? Internet commentators and influencers tend to go chasing after the M1Ultra and wonder what a great "video studio" machine it would be, doing 4K, 5K, 6K or even 8K video projects with this expensive hardware. But what about those of us who might occasionally do 4K or 1080 video projects, along with some photos, desktop publishing, some CAD, PDF generating, and other general office productivity tasks? To that market, even the base M1Max might seem like overkill. So, where's the M1Pro desktop for the rest of us? There is none, and all of you internet personalities seem to miss that.
Agree
Might be a stretch here, but I feel like that’s on purpose. Think about why the iPad Air is missing the 128GB model.
@MacRumors - Thank you for posting this review. This is one of the best review I watched so far. One factor which I do not see on any of the reviews for MacBook Pro's is that under current scenario (where remote/hybrid work flow exist) is the internet connectivity. I know McBook pros do not have an ethernet port and needs to be connected through a ethernet-thunderbolt adapter, if I connect like this will it affect the internet speed? This question comes from assuming a situation where I have only one editing system, which is MacBook Pro.
Thunderbolt is so much faster than any of Internet speed right now that the adapter should increase your internet speed not slow down (jk but seriously, nothing to worry rather then needing of extra stuff to carry)
I have a question regarding using a MacBook Pro connected to a Sudio Display, for example, on a permanent basis. I'm concerned about the longevity of the MacBook Pro permanently connected to a power supply. I would definitely be leaning to getting the 14" MacBook Pro and connect it to a Studio display, rather than Mac Studio, except for my concern about longevity issues. I'd appreciate any advice.
I had the same concern but I'm counting on battery optimization to protect the battery when the MBP is plugged into the Studio Display 24/7. Plus I bought AppleCare for both the MBP and the Studio Display. Here's hoping these two precautions suffice.
I have the same concerns. However, I also think of the life of a computer. Many people are still using their 2015/2016 MBP let alone 2018/2019. In those years the MBP got heavily updated to today with the Pro and Max chips. Even 2015/16 - 2019 was a big jump. I don't know many people who could not use or had issues with their 2015/16 MPB. Even power users (perhaps except for the standard less battery life on battery power as time goes by - which seems to be the major issue - and is also replaceable by Apple - of course at cost). So I think the question is - With the MBP M-Pro and M-Max will it work as a desktop solution for 2-5 years? I think so. Will the battery life being amazing if its plugged in 24/7 after that time frame? No. BUT! I think in similar time frame you are going to see an advancement in tech that will blow away current offerings and/or at a cheaper price point to todays price vs performance and specs. Basically, I'd say this - if yo have ANY need for remote work with a screen the MBP is an excellent choice. If you had always using a desktop solution, then save a bit and go Studio. Both are going to give you similar performance (A first!!!) so I wouldn't go studio vs MBP on that basis. Lastly, it will take software developers at least 2 years from now to catch up with current hardware (and that is at an accerlated bace - which most R&D doesn't have the budget or need for). So in 2-5 years time the AMAZING tech you've spent $$$ will FINALLY be supported - and the question is - at that time what will be available? (Certainly the offerings of today will be found at a MUCHCCCH more affordable price point than todays pricing whether MPB or Studio
@@justinavila1320 Thank you both very much for the very thoughtful advice. I’m still on the fence, as I’m not traveling much these days, as far as justifying the MBP, and so it would be mainly used as a desktop solution.
You’re the first!!! Key line you said: Short term Vs. Long term. Hauling the heavy weight and knowing the Apps will evolve to utilize the hardware… M1 Ultra is the investment for 5 years. I see it as the cheapest option!
Screw benchmarks! Real world testing is the only indicator for what we will see. I don’t run benchmarks in my photography work flow.
Thanks Dan, an honest review again! So ova spec & performance stats videos! Great video 👍🏻
Someone please run the logic pro space designer test. ‘In the box’ music producers want to know.
We’re getting to a point where the horsepower is actually becoming a bit irrelevant past the base tier option of a lot of these machines. Kind of like our iPhones. I still use my 11 Pro Max and I love it.
Now that I’m getting a 14” M1 Max I’m hoping for five years of usage.
What's really wild is that if you compare a 10CPU/32GPU M1 Max MacBook Pro and a Mac Studio with the same SoC, RAM, and Storage, the prices are only $1,100 apart. Add the Magic Keyboard and Magic Trackpad, and you're only left with $752 to pay for a display--and you can't get a display of the quality of the MBP's screen for that kind of money. The new Studio Display doesn't even meet that quality (let alone that price target)!
Aside from the above differences, you're left with the Mac Studio having 4 instead of 3 TB4 ports, a 10Gb Ethernet jack, and two extra of each of USB-A and USB-C ports--with the MacBook Pro having a battery, webcam, and a microphone.
M1 max is definitely enough for me
Love that under desk laptop holder.. what is it and where can I get one?
Check description!
Good comparison with useful, actionable information. Thanks. Also, is there a configuration you find to be best regarding pairing the MacBook Pro w/an external display in terms of scaling on the external display. I’ve tried connecting the 16” MBP Max w/a 27” 5K iMac using the new SharePlay feature but find that the MBP screen doesn’t translate to the iMac screen in a way that isn’t some trade off between screen content appearing too small but things have that retina screen resolution vs scaling it so content is large enough but resolution suffers greatly. That aside I’ve also noticed that even when connecting the two via Thunderbolt there’s still noticeable latency/smearing(?) when moving the mouse curser around the iMac screen which I find frustrating as addressing this issue so that it’s a non-issue for end users by enabling the sort of functionality/compatibility I’m sure we all are wanting seems to me to be reasonable/doable, and not allowing that (at least currently) seems more a decision to push users to purchase the studio display, etc, despite my 2020 27” iMac essentially being the same screen. Guess I just wish we had the “it just works” functionality/reliability of target display mode again, and if that was possible a decade ago I find it hard to believe it’s anything but a choice currently to limit it now. So my ranting aside I guess I’m just wondering what the best external display for the 16” MBP Max is (does Pro Display XDR) provide a 1:1 mirroring or extension of the MBP Liquid Retina XDR screen? Does any other monitor provide that ?) as well as any advice for optimizing the SharePlay to the 27” 5K iMac screen in terms of retaining the retina resolution while also having content on the screen appear at a reasonable size. Thanks for reading this far & again thanks for the review.
I don’t think connecting them via Thunderbolt is even possible? In the sense as a native video connection. I believe it will always be a network aka compressed video stream, hence the lag. This used to be possible on older iMacs (target display mode), but not since the 5k I believe.
Guess you’re better off buying a Studio Display 😉
PS If you would connect a real display, you can just use the native resolution of said display and would not be mirroring but extending the display
@@madthijsgames 👍
@@madthijsgames Yeah, connecting via Thunderbolt cable is possible, I've connected to it both using wifi and thunderbolt to use the airplay feature to use it as an external display. After searching for any details I saw that Apple themselves made brief mention of using a wired connection to potentially achieve less latency, etc., so I connected the two computers with a Thunderbolt 3/4 cable and turned wifi off on the iMac to ensure if/when it showed up as a source for airplay, that it wasn't showing up via a wifi connection, but in my personal experience with both methods of connecting (wired and via wifi) the resolution as well as latency were noticeable. Thanks for the reply by the way 👍
Video editing (playback, transcoding, rendering, and exporting) is pretty much handled by the Media Engine. That's why there is no much difference between the M1 Pro, Max, and Ultra. Programs such as Photoshop and After Effects will benefit more by increasing the RAM.
Well there’s double the media engine on an ultra so there is a difference in some of that.
@@macrumors You are right, but only if your project calls for 18 streams of 8k ProRes 422 video.😊
I need one of these two for a photography studio for tethering shoots. It's so annoying that I can't decide...cause at the end they cost the same when you add the keyboard, mouse, screen..
Well then at that point, your choice should come down to whether you need to take it away from your desk. If the answer to that question is yes, go MBP. If you never need to take it from your desk, get the studio and a mouse/keyboard/monitor and you'll be much happier with the larger screen.
I'll have both thanks 😀👍
I appreciate you taking a diff approach with this video to other creators. Q: what is that cool under desk shelf for the MBP you're using? 👀
Put it in description!
@@macrumors ty!
M1 max 32gpu with 64gb ram is blowing my mind. Editing 4K 10bit 422 in Premiere Pro has been amazing 👍
Is a 16 mini led really that good as it is mostly in clamshell mode and so will be heated up and the screen will never really be used in spite you paying for it plus another screen! Sounds like a bad deal for you, as you also do not travel….
If you are a programmer and you are testing multiple micro services interacting, each in their own VW on your local machine, then the M1 Ultra will really do you good. So basically if you are simulating 10 computers on that one computer ... also for compiling - do a test of how fast Safari or Chrome compiles on the Notebook or the M1 Max or the M1 Ultra that will show you a difference ;-)
I’m thinking about a Mac Mini M1 with a LG 5K monitor mainly because I understand I can also plug in my iPad into the monitor and my windows work laptop. To give me more versatility and options. Comments welcome
I have both M1 Max MacBook 64 gig and Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128 gig. I like being mobile and having a desktop.
I guess the new MacBook Pro with M2 Pro processor would be similar or even better that this M1 Max? that should be good for Audio? Mixing with lost of plugins and 100 tracks?
Current PC user but thinking of going to Apple. I'm a motion designer. Thoughts on getting the most powerful MBP and also using it as a desktop by connecting it to two monitors?! I like the idea of being able to work on a desk w/ two monitors but also being able to create content while sitting on the couch on one screen. These are expensive hardware and am undecided. Ideally I want 512 storage and 64GB RAM thought 128 would be a dream machine!
I'm using a maxed out M1 Max MacBook Pro for 4k 16 Bit Open EXR video through after effects, with LOTS of denoise, renoise, transforms, heavy color adjustments of dozens and dozens of layers, Glows, etc etc + 3d production in Modo and I bring this machine to it's knees with regularity. I am basically hammering at it with about as much abuse as one can. I am also running two 4k displays, and two 2k displays simultaneously. My only gripe is the restart process... I have to disconnect ALL peripherals before restarting, or the machine crashes with. some kind of video error. I've contacted apple multiple times and they always just chalk it up to software conflicts. One tech even tried to convince me that I was out of spec by asking the laptop to run 4 displays. So, I'm a little disappointed at that aspect.
@Dan: Can you point me to your under-table laptop holder? I honestly had never considered this option as I didn't know it existed!
Here you go! amzn.to/3DawhwF
@@macrumors Thanks so much!
Agree, the ultra is overkill now but it is a good investment with respect to longevity as programs will become more power hungry over time. It’s a bit “pay now play later”. But for most people the max will totally do. If you’re working with videos 20 minutes or less then I think max is enough. For me the max is still an awesome upgrade coming from an iMac with i9. It kills the i9.
Wrong … better buy a new entry level in 3 years … the expensive models loose the most in resell value.. look at the current 2019 mac pros … dont sell even at 1/2 price. It is only good if your accountants can agressively depreciate it
@@Alperic27 New hardware every 3 years? Seems excessive to me. My IMac from 2012 is still in use as my second computer, but running Linux now. My main computer is about 3,5 years old.
@@lucius1976 i think it is in fact 2 different questions… for private owners, no doubts that they can be kept a long time for just web browsing. For professional use, it is imo a bad idea to keep them that long… better replace them after 3 years… because they dont age all too well… and the m1 has a design flaw that will become very apearant when m2 comes out. So the perf delta for pro useage will be very visible… the M1 ultra is a bad investment for most users, including most pro users today and tomorrow. M2 ultra will be a different story.
Your comment is pointless. By the time things get powerful enough you will be getting a new computer.
@@Alperic27 what design flaw?
Already listened to the podcast
A maxed out 16 inch plus a base model Studio is virtually the same price as a maxed out studio. 2 Mac’s is always better than one. Especially if you use the 16 inch xdr display as the screen for the studio with continuity.
Why would you use the 16 inch display with the studio? Wtf that’s a joke right?
Rene is great, one of the best tech UA-camrs.
No he’s not. He’s a Apple schill.
PLEASE tell me what monitor that is lol
So relieved they didn't update the 14&16" Macbook Pro with this chip, since my 16" Max arrived late last month (after ordering it in November 🙃)
The M1 Ultra chip may be too physically large for the MacBook Pro
I got a M1 Mac mini last year and truly regretted it barely 1 month after buying it. The graphics performance left me disappointed, just for old games... When I increased the resolution it couldn't produce smooth graphics. Even worse the bluetooth can't really handle more than the keyboard and mouse, and even often with those two I'd have the trackpad not following or a key being super delayed. So now my desk is a cable jungle. I tried everything Apple support said, completely erased and reinstalled the OS but the thing is just unreliable. Known issue with the Mac mini, hope they fixed it with the studio...
Your point? This video is not about that
Mac mini is a whole world different from Mac studio 😉
An embarrassment of riches ... 😄
I replaced a 2019 16" MBP with a 2020 16" M1 Max, but my main driver is still a 2020 iMac 5K.
I _know_ the MBP more powerful, but it's my portable and the iMac does just fine for me - and the 5K display is just too good to supplant.
When the iMac gets too long in the tooth, I'll probably replace it with a later generation Mac Studio, but for now I'm fat and happy although transcodes _do_ take a bit longer than I like. Can't beat the 27" display and real physical keyboard though.
I can't believe that people aren't showing where the other power it possesses lies... simulation. A few VFX videos and VFX studio artists are showing that it's a lot faster than the 12900k in blender which also filters to XParticles which involves a LOT of memory and disk interfacing. Nothing else comes close.
Where are these videos, I would be very curious to see them.
@@p3rrypmHere's the best one: ua-cam.com/video/2OXUoPsQ2p4/v-deo.html
On a sidenote you should edit podcasts in multicam. That looks messy here
Based on what I've seen the past week plus, I'm going to wait for the Mac Studio + Display 2.0 and Macbook Pro 2.0 of the M1 or M2.
Here's why...
There is a lot of speculation and rumors that have been floating around about the Mac Studio most likely getting a performance enhancement in the next couple of month. Additionally, with the M1 Ultra still being super new, it's bound to run into some pretty major issues in the next year or so. Compound this with the fact that the Studio Display may end up being the next iMac in some capacity, not to mention the hazardous cord situation, there is plenty of reasons to wait for Apple to improve on these elements.
Plus it would be nice if the "Apple Tax" on these things was cut in half as appose to the typical price gouging.
The Macbook pro seems pretty solid, but that notch... That notch is just infuriating. I would honestly take the touch bar back to get rid of the notch.
I prefer Mac computers and intend to invest for the next decade of my career with something stable, but right now these products feel like stand-ins for something better that is soon to come and all the early adopters will be mad when all their feedback is made a reality. It's kind of like with the Maschine Plus where a lot of people bought into the Maschine Mk3, and not even a few years later find out the M+ is coming.
So those are my thoughts. Too much needs to be revised to make these reflect what customers want, and they're so close to making i happen. Cut the "Apple Tax" on the prices, at least for upgrades, and more people will be happy, and bank accounts too (yes I'm aware of the monthly payment plans, but no thanks).
By the way, what are your thoughts on Apple being even more open to Right to Repair?
So ridiculous how these people say “it finished in 15 minutes wow that’s amazing” as if their life is so important they are always in a rush or don’t know how to multitask while their video is downloading.
I appreciate the real world but how about do minimal learning or get help. How about some video, a large project compiled and for a heavy intensive do a project in astrophotography tool Pixinsight (lots of i/o and graphical filtering). In other words a small gamut of intense real world applications
Since the product cycle is so long when it comes to any new Apple product feel that originally the Mac Studio was built, and designed with the Intel processor line in mind. That is why in any of the reviews where people are trying to cause the M series SOC's to throttle it just never happens. Would like someone to be able to have the CPU / GPU going full blast for a week, and record the temperature data.
A few days with my new setup that replaced my iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014). I now have a MacBook Air M1 chip with 8‑core CPU, 7‑core GPU, and 16‑core Neural Engine, 16GB unified memory, 2TB SSD storage, CalDigit TS4 Thunderbolt 4 Dock, and a LG Ultra HD 5K Ultra Slim 27MD5KA-B Monitor on a desk VESA arm. Only thing I have noticed via iStat Menus monitor program is that even with 16GB unified memory with the programs I normally leave open memory is still being swapped out to the SSD storage. This is the reason I purchased 2TB storage is that even with the read/write of swap memory the MacBook Air should last me a very long time.
Love it when young people talk about the cost. Apple Mac Studio, Studio Monitor in my configuration would've cost me $4,198.00 which is less than my original Macintosh purchased in 1984 at $2,500 when adjusted for inflation would be $6,764.87 on the introduction date of the Apple Studio lineup.
If I was still in the world of professional production I would have no problem spending the maximum of $7,999.00 on the Apple Mac Studio M1 Ultra with 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 32-core Neural Engine, 128GB unified memory, 8TB SSD storage. We use to rent lens for some of our equipment because the cost of purchase versus the limited times that we need to use them for production projects. Some lenses can be very expensive however if you need them all of the time you need to purchase them.
Thing is as a normal just do not need all that Mac Studio power, and I live in the consumer desktop part of the grid.
Those render times seem really slow.
The videos that I create for my UA-cam channel (in 4K) are edited in Premiere Pro on a Windows PC. I'm used to render times about 15-20% of the duration of the timeline, if not faster -- a 40 minute video, for example, will render in about 9-10 minutes or less, even with multiple layers, color grading, scaling, After Effects lower thirds, etc. Simpler videos render even faster, even having to transcode the footage from ProRes to h.264.
My computer is nice, but not overly impressive... a 3950X CPU with 2080 GPU. Good, but certainly far from top-of-the-line or state-of-the-art. And it cost a lot less than any Mac Studio M1 Ultra.
If the render times mentioned in this video are typical, those aren't very impressive. Kind of embarrassingly slow for a machine that is advertised as being appropriate for video editing, honestly.
Rendering and exporting are two different things
@@macrumors On Premiere they're not... they're one and the same. Export times in Final Cut should be comparable to Render times in Premiere.
which exact pc do you have. sounds interesting.
Just buy the best machine you can afford. Since I am older portability is really not that important, but a large monitor is more important than a laptop.
Just upgrade the Mac Studio and remote access into it with a regular notebook.
This dude still refuses to travel. lol
How many of your really know how to utilise the ultra fully
I love macbook
So basically in order to sell more Macbook Pro Max Apple limited intentionally the Studio..., i mean why to pay 4 grands for a Max Mac book pro when i can have a max at home for half the price ,ok ok, you can't move it ...
Disney may sue Apple for the power port shape.
hahaha! GOLD
I really think you missed a massive community of creators who might buy an Ultra, Music makers!! 1. Fan noise! The Studio Max has fan noise , a less efficient heat sink increases the noise, as this could be sitting on a desktop that will be a big problem, even an external hard drive is too loud for my studio desktop. 2. The thousands of Mac Pro 2010 owners who have waited years for this machine! That Mac Pro was overkill then!
Have you used it actually? I haven’t heard anyone say this about the Mac Studio.
Yeah both mac studios have the same internal thermal management so not sure I follow this
@@macrumors doesn’t the ultra have copper heat sink and the max has aluminum?
Funny how the guy tries to defend Apple. They lied about the Ultra being seen as one chip. Until they optimize for the chip not worth it.
How do you figure they lied? Did you watch any of the videos, they show 20 cpu cores and 64 gpu cores.
What I hate about laptops are how vulnerable they are.. if I drop my coffee into the keyboard Its $3500 gone.. with a desktop Its just a new keyboard, and also if just one thing breaks(display, keyboard, speaker etc) I will have to get the entire system repaired costing money and time.. with a desktop you can just replace whatever broke and get on with working right away. And then there is the battery.. it will loose performance from the day you start using it, and after 4 years of use Its just half the battery performance (if that much)
If you’re that concerned, pay for AppleCare. It covers accidents. If you pour coffee into the inside of your desktop power supply, it will be completely dead, too.
@@mbvglider yes I know. But Apple care is like 10-15% of the purchase price. I will usually put my desktop pc out of harms way.. but thanks! :)
@@Franky75ify Only for a base model. If you're actually paying $3500 for a laptop, AppleCare+ represents a much smaller percentage of your purchase price.
Go Bobcats!
I'm definitely disappointed with the Ultra benchmark performance we've seen so far. The advantages of the Ultra should be obvious, I mean, it's a $2,000 upgrade. But if nothing else, it just shows that the power of the Ultra won't be realized for many creators, but reserved for those operating at the fringes, doing heavy duty scientific work, fluid dynamics, or have 8k workflows.
Agree. Even for software developers, M1 Ultra only offers significant advantages for those who use Swift, but not other programming languages.
hey ya'lllll
@@jay_cruz 💎💎😂
nice peanut butter?
Only I love stevejobs I love apple 🍎 but u really good awesome men 💕👍🔥
I prefer to major editing at my desk with a large display. On the go I probably am fine with a M1 laptop.
They went super pleb/layman on the content 👀🤣
I think a lot of reviewers that are always suggesting the max instead of the ultra are missing people who need the extra CPU power. For us audio guys the gpu doesn’t help us out at all and neither do the encoders and decoders and so we need the 20 cores to get the most out of plugins and vsts.
I said it in the beginning but also have done music production tests with the max when it came out and it was more than capable. The max is most likely good enough
@@macrumors 100 percent and this wasn’t just directed towards you. For me running a professional recording studio and having waited for 6 years at this point for a new computer to come out (almost bought the Mac Pro but stopped when I realized apple silicon was taking over) I need all the cpu power I can get. PCIE is no longer needed for most interfaces so this is going to work great if maybe a bit more messy with all the drives having to be external. Also sure would be nice for us audio guys to access the gpu power for plugins etc, I was reading about a company that was working on that. Thanks for the video!
Ultra vs Max... really.
What’s so frustrating about expensive Apple products is you buy the top of the line best laptop or computer and then 12 months later they come out with something twice as powerful and you no longer have the best product available.
it's why the stock price keeps going up and up
I had to close the video when you said that 1 minute and 50 seconds of time saved between the M1 Max MBP and the M1 Ultra Mac Studio was "A quiet a bit of time, helpful for when you're on a hurry". Like I can't take such a foolish person seriously.
What's the real purpose of this post, except for creating clickbait?
Lets just face the truth guys, all those who bought Ultra got dooped
What the fuck was going on with that guy’s beard.
I could have spec’d out the Mac Studio M1 Max for less and more power than the MacBook Pro M1 Max I ordered, but I see a benefit to having the optional portability. I have been using a Mid 2010 Mac Pro for 15+ years. The MacBook Pro will be perfect as a second monitor for graphic design while working from home or taking to the office. Having the option to take it to a coffee shop or the couch and have true desktop performance is a game changer for me.
Why are you lying? You think people here are that stupid? A macpro from 2010 for 15+ years??? Is 2022 right now so you cannot used it more than 11 years +…. So stupid to bluntly lie like that, your credibility is already out of the window no matter what you say after this!
Bong
Final cut is literally garbage. It's BY FAR the worst NLE on the market. You're insane to waste your time working with it.
I have made my living editing video for nearly 40 years. I started using FCPX as soon as it was released. You are sadly mistaken.
It’s not the best but it certainly works really well with apple silicon and it works for my needs and the needs of many others
@@macrumors it’s the best I’ve ever used. Premiere likes to crash and lose work. FCP crashes maybe once every month or two. Never lost any work though. When you learn the magnetic timeline going back to Premiere or Resolve is is just slow and tedious. You don’t “need” Resolve for color correction. You can do most of it in FCP and if you need a little more there’s Color Finale. I could keep going and I know everyone is different of course. Just IMHO.
I’m convinced the main reason people don’t like FCP is because they’ve never had proper training on it. I’ve heard many say “I didn’t know it could do that” about something they would’ve learned in the first hour of a proper training program. 😎👍🏼
Which NLE is the best for UA-camrs starting out? And how do you rate Resolve? (It's free)
@@bradbell4022 FCP IMHO but you need proper training to use it effectively. I like Ripple Training. Their FCP and Motion courses are well worth the cost if you’re serious about learning how to edit. They also have good stuff on UA-cam but an actual training course is a better place to start because it will take you sequentially through the use of the software. If you’re looking for free training there’s plenty on UA-cam but I can’t recommend most of it. The best IMHO is from Ripple or Izzy Video (even though Izzy training is getting old). Both of these sources of training are from people who use FCP/Motion in real world situations. Most of what other “training” I see (especially on YT) is not.