when I used blheli32 the bot would always twitch backwards after it advances forwards. I run a relatively low reduction and can confidently say how much better AM32 is for drive purposes. I use tekko 45a ESCs. The disadvantage is there's less settings and using an ST link to directly reprogram is hard, but it's made the world of a difference. My bot is built with drive in heavy consideration, so it's cool to see similar results.
Wondering if using a higher pole count motor would give better control at lower speeds, regardless of the firmware. (Assuming such a motor is available in a similar form factor) My line of thinking here is that you'd have more switching per revolution, similar to at higher gear ratio.
Looks amazing
when I used blheli32 the bot would always twitch backwards after it advances forwards. I run a relatively low reduction and can confidently say how much better AM32 is for drive purposes. I use tekko 45a ESCs. The disadvantage is there's less settings and using an ST link to directly reprogram is hard, but it's made the world of a difference. My bot is built with drive in heavy consideration, so it's cool to see similar results.
Luckily more and more ESCs are shipping with AM32 already on them, so you don't have to worry about getting the bootloader on there via STLink.
Nice.... tjat is what I am looking for.... still struggling to flash my first BL Heli to AM32...
feel free to reflash that 160a flycolor to am32 ^__^
Hmm. That would be interesting. I'm not sure if I have that or if Chad does...
Wow Thanks!
Wondering if using a higher pole count motor would give better control at lower speeds, regardless of the firmware. (Assuming such a motor is available in a similar form factor) My line of thinking here is that you'd have more switching per revolution, similar to at higher gear ratio.
It seems logical. The motor would have to move fewer degrees in order to get EMF.
Those motors already have 14 poles? There are higher ones?