I think I pissed of other people with this question. I said where does Hailey’s comet go and why have we gone full circle since recorded sky .why doesn’t the scenery change if we’re moving through the stars how are we able to predict..they were globe provers thinking I was flat.i just thought they might know cause there so smart and they like to refer to the sky. I’m just trying to learn but all people say is ask google.i did it says everything is moving same time and direction
It sounds like you're genuinely curious and seeking to understand more about the cosmos. Questions about celestial phenomena like comets and the apparent lack of change in the night sky despite Earth's movement through space can be complex, but they're also fascinating subjects to explore. Keep asking questions and seeking knowledge-it's how we learn and grow. And don't be discouraged by dismissive responses; there are plenty of people who are willing to engage in thoughtful discussions and help others learn.
@@TheCosmicCommute1 yup I’m confused and trying to learn I’m now stuck on how Hubble and web telescopes can get still images if we’re moving so fast along with everything else. But I don’t know shit they don’t provide adequate information other then because of our sophisticated software.the only way my little brain can make sense of it is if that webbs a scanner creating renderings and Hubble is floating under a balloon in the atmosphere.I don’t think I’ll comment anymore anywhere I can hear myself sounding like a dumbass lol
so hubble and webb telescopes generally take pictures of the universe around x light years away which even at our speed that we move through the universe it is still not really moving much where they take pictures. And the pictures close to home such as of other planets from webb and hubble tends to be more blurry due to the movement and the fact that these telescopes are designed for long distance viewing. Basically think of this a magnifying glass seeing your finger really close is blurry but seeing something further away makes it clearer. That is similar to what these telescopes are designed for magnifying the universe so we can see a long way away
![Journey to the Andromeda Galaxy [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-ybiXR2WCFQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Realy I like this video so so much like you can imagine its more than interestyng
I think I pissed of other people with this question. I said where does Hailey’s comet go and why have we gone full circle since recorded sky .why doesn’t the scenery change if we’re moving through the stars how are we able to predict..they were globe provers thinking I was flat.i just thought they might know cause there so smart and they like to refer to the sky. I’m just trying to learn but all people say is ask google.i did it says everything is moving same time and direction
It sounds like you're genuinely curious and seeking to understand more about the cosmos. Questions about celestial phenomena like comets and the apparent lack of change in the night sky despite Earth's movement through space can be complex, but they're also fascinating subjects to explore. Keep asking questions and seeking knowledge-it's how we learn and grow. And don't be discouraged by dismissive responses; there are plenty of people who are willing to engage in thoughtful discussions and help others learn.
@@TheCosmicCommute1 yup I’m confused and trying to learn I’m now stuck on how Hubble and web telescopes can get still images if we’re moving so fast along with everything else. But I don’t know shit they don’t provide adequate information other then because of our sophisticated software.the only way my little brain can make sense of it is if that webbs a scanner creating renderings and Hubble is floating under a balloon in the atmosphere.I don’t think I’ll comment anymore anywhere I can hear myself sounding like a dumbass lol
so hubble and webb telescopes generally take pictures of the universe around x light years away which even at our speed that we move through the universe it is still not really moving much where they take pictures. And the pictures close to home such as of other planets from webb and hubble tends to be more blurry due to the movement and the fact that these telescopes are designed for long distance viewing. Basically think of this a magnifying glass seeing your finger really close is blurry but seeing something further away makes it clearer. That is similar to what these telescopes are designed for magnifying the universe so we can see a long way away
JWST and Hubble do not “take pictures” and it’s irresponsible of you to pass yourself off as a knowledge channel then spew that garbage. Do better.