Hon. Kamla Persad Bissessar | Debate on Property Tax - March 18, 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 бер 2024
  • Opposition Leader The Hon. Kamla Persad Bissessar Speaking on the Motion brought by the government to amend the Property Tax Act, March 18, 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @indrasingh8478
    @indrasingh8478 4 місяці тому +9

    Ii agree, this tax is definitely' POVERTY TAX'.

  • @moucheali3911
    @moucheali3911 4 місяці тому +13

    Finally some proper ground work with historical facts
    I have never seen a PNM soo hungry n desperate for poor people money while they givin free money to all their friends and family

  • @Balharbor28
    @Balharbor28 4 місяці тому +7

    Property tax must be based only on
    1) the value of the land, not on the house on the property. If it
    based on the house, then that discourages the improvement of buildings.
    2) Land size is usually based on the standard size of 50 by 100 or a prorated quare footage.
    P
    3) property must be valued in relation to distance from the capital city.
    4)The farther from the city, the less expensive it is.
    5) The phone system already has a breakdown according to zone, so half the work is already done as you can attach value to phone zones.
    (6) Land value can be assessed every 20 years.
    7) The regional corporation must be the only assessing agency to deal with land tax and manageing how it is to be allocated to the regional corporations on the basis of one man one vote which means that the population of each corporation determines how the taxes are to be allocated according to the population in each corporation, not on the square footage of the corporation.
    8) One man one vote is among the essence of democracy, but it does not exist in trinidad.
    9) The two seats in tobago must be the basis of the size of all seats in trinidad and tobago.
    10) No seat in trinidad should be larger than the smallest of the two tobago seats.
    11) The difference between seats must not be more than one percent of each other, not five percent as it is today.
    12) Most citizens everywhere support property tax, so it wise to support some form of property tax. Therefore I say property tax must be limited to land value only.
    13) the city of Port of Spain can be the determining factor in calculating land taxes. Furthermore that can be an o centivr for improving the quality of life in pos.
    14) all the government housing in pos and environs must be sold to private development and have them convert these houses into condominiums and sold to the general public.
    15) the first floors of all the multi story houses should be converted to business condominium a d sold as business properties.

  • @Balharbor28
    @Balharbor28 4 місяці тому +6

    Annual rental value can never be the basis of property tax when you are not renting your property and do.not know what the rent is.

  • @deneshboodoo2695
    @deneshboodoo2695 4 місяці тому +4

    I do not support any new tax and neither do i support property tax, i will support land and building tax. I pay too much tax as it is and that is PAYE, VAT etc. i do not make salaries like that of all those government politicians that make sure they dont have to pay taxes like the small man. Politicians in government needs to start paying taxes and make up new taxes for themselves to pay cause they make so much free money for doing nothing.

  • @courtpaul9334
    @courtpaul9334 4 місяці тому +5

    Most of us don't mind the Land & building tax But we certainly don't support this property tax !

    • @mariesunnybere1612
      @mariesunnybere1612 4 місяці тому +1

      That right in the old days people pay land and building tax and only by the year not every month so why should people pay every month for property tax when it is not our faults and also pay so much when it is kamla and the unc that cause this problem in this country in the first places

  • @mohammedali808
    @mohammedali808 4 місяці тому +4

    If you want to collect property tax no government should: 1) DISCRIMINATE BY ONLY TAXING RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES MUST BE INCLUDED.
    Proposed tax rates are grossly overvalued by as much as 80 % especially in the countryside. Cut rates NOW.

  • @Balharbor28
    @Balharbor28 4 місяці тому +3

    Unc constitution calls for internal elections.as outlined in the constution.

    • @mohammedali808
      @mohammedali808 4 місяці тому +1

      What that has to do with property tax.

  • @rhibran5065
    @rhibran5065 4 місяці тому +2

    When the ppl can't pay their tax they would increase it until the government take their house and land. It would be like part of America ppl leaving there homes and making tents out on the streets

  • @lisajones8758
    @lisajones8758 4 місяці тому

    Very pleasing to hear your debate. You get your points over very forcefully without having to shout like Rowdy Rowly. God bless you and the UNC. May you be successful in the next General election.

  • @patriciadumas-simon3348
    @patriciadumas-simon3348 4 місяці тому +2

    I am sure that there are house holders that do not own property but occupying them without a deed.

    • @mariesunnybere1612
      @mariesunnybere1612 4 місяці тому

      Yes that corrected that is why some of them done supports the property tax cause they do not have a deed for the land you are so right just Listerine to them and you will get the answers you want

  • @patriciadumas-simon3348
    @patriciadumas-simon3348 4 місяці тому +1

    What part of the world that does not pay taxes, go America and do not pay your taxes, probably only in Gaza do not pay tax.

  • @patriciadumas-simon3348
    @patriciadumas-simon3348 4 місяці тому +1

    I hope she has solutions for everything

  • @Balharbor28
    @Balharbor28 26 днів тому

    Statistics show that 50 percent of new voters come out to vote. So the unc has a population with whom to gain voters.

  • @deneshboodoo2695
    @deneshboodoo2695 4 місяці тому +1

    Tanty you didnt know to bring a bill to repeal the property tax bit you all left it there on the books for what reason???

    • @mariesunnybere1612
      @mariesunnybere1612 4 місяці тому

      She left it there to bring it back in services but she did not get the chances she lost the election that why she did not removed it

  • @rabinathsamaroo3917
    @rabinathsamaroo3917 4 місяці тому

    In responce to Patricia Damass you vo to America an live if you like their system. This is Trinidad are you living the American life in T&T. Tellus.

  • @djsmoothvibes2562
    @djsmoothvibes2562 3 місяці тому

    This woman
    Wreaks of brilliance

  • @patriciadumas-simon3348
    @patriciadumas-simon3348 4 місяці тому +1

    I hope she can give us a solution instead of property tax

    • @Balharbor28
      @Balharbor28 4 місяці тому

      The solution for a country with a cosmopolitan population is proportional representation at every level of governance.
      It is interesting or even ironic that we have proportional representation only for the dead where cemeteries are sectioned off according to religion.
      We need proportional representation at all levels of governance like there is in India where there are all kinds of minorities that are supported by funding according to their sizes.
      The most obvious need for proportional representation is in the regional corporation where proportional representation in funding is absent, not to mention in the house of representative and in the senate.
      Guyana took a bold step and included proportional representation in its constitution unlike trinidad where it is most needed to minimise tensions among the ethnicities.

  • @patriciadumas-simon3348
    @patriciadumas-simon3348 4 місяці тому

    Property Tax is a new name for Land and building tax. How property does she own in T&T.

  • @alberthasampath1473
    @alberthasampath1473 4 місяці тому +1

    Kamla you lie

    • @Balharbor28
      @Balharbor28 4 місяці тому

      Saying that kamla lied is very far from the truth.
      You have to understand the composition of the partnership with very powerful leaders or representatives, some who may have inadvertently undermined the partnership.
      Mr Dookeran came across as having inadvertently been the cause of the disintegration of the partnership.
      With a constitutional majority, many changes could have been made by amendments to the constitution rather than introducing a new constitution. But sadly, that did not happen even with such a powerful composition of representatives.
      The present call for an amendment to the constitution must address the issue of proportional representation, especially in the area of funding thecregional corporations.

    • @mariesunnybere1612
      @mariesunnybere1612 4 місяці тому

      Kamla always lies and fool people when it already happened and suit her