Why are drug prices so high? Investigating the outdated US patent system | Priti Krishtel

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2020
  • Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized Talk recommendations and more.
    Between 2006 and 2016, the number of drug patents granted in the United States doubled -- but not because there was an explosion in invention or innovation. Drug companies have learned how to game the system, accumulating patents not for new medicines but for small changes to existing ones, which allows them to build monopolies, block competition and drive prices up. Health justice lawyer Priti Krishtel sheds light on how we've lost sight of the patent system's original intent -- and offers five reforms for a redesign that would serve the public and save lives.
    The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), submit a Media Request here: media-requests.TED.com
    Follow TED on Twitter: / tedtalks
    Like TED on Facebook: / ted
    Subscribe to our channel: / ted

КОМЕНТАРІ • 215

  • @konoha1993
    @konoha1993 4 роки тому +54

    This is the sort of thing Ted should host more of

    • @rain_forest_waterx4093
      @rain_forest_waterx4093 4 роки тому

      James Langley Yeah!!

    • @maxtontrevor6094
      @maxtontrevor6094 2 роки тому

      i guess im asking randomly but does someone know a trick to get back into an instagram account?
      I was stupid lost my account password. I would love any assistance you can give me.

    • @davisellis7445
      @davisellis7445 2 роки тому

      @Maxton Trevor Instablaster :)

  • @1gaymofo
    @1gaymofo 4 роки тому +116

    So the solution is for politicians to make changes that won’t happen because they are paid by lobbyists to prevent the changes

    • @tiffanyvalencia8415
      @tiffanyvalencia8415 4 роки тому +3

      Don't forget the do-nothing demonrats in the House. And no, creating bills that have no substance doesn't count so don't think that it's the next Branch's fault for "sitting" on them.

    • @layaqui
      @layaqui 4 роки тому +11

      It’s also repubs in office shooting down anything that will help the American people because they are bought by pharmaceutical companies.

    • @louiscotteta566
      @louiscotteta566 4 роки тому +7

      Look at this comments section. Its the fact that the population has been turned against each other and points to the D’s or the R’s. Martin began with a good statement, now we have a comment crying dems and a comment crying republicans... case in point how the system works.

    • @CheezMonsterCrazy
      @CheezMonsterCrazy 4 роки тому

      @@louiscotteta566 Don't forget the guy claiming it was Satanists.

    • @magottyk
      @magottyk 4 роки тому +1

      Politicians are bought by votes, lobbyists use contributions and other under the table means to sway politicians to their side, including the threat of votes from workers (via jobs) that they don't represent. Grass roots citizen lobbying is based on votes and so lobbyists can be neutralised when there's a threat that they could lose office.

  • @JohnSmith-db1qi
    @JohnSmith-db1qi 4 роки тому +64

    "Because we have failed to adapt this system to fit today's reality". HOW MANY THINGS IN TODAY'S SOCIETY CAN THAT BE SAID ABOUT?

    • @PaulWTaber-zd8ds
      @PaulWTaber-zd8ds 4 роки тому +4

      Our democratic society. Laws and amendments in our constitution. Religion. Columbus day.

    • @mayainverse9429
      @mayainverse9429 4 роки тому

      @@PaulWTaber-zd8ds yea freedom of speech is outdated. and your the first to be sent to gulag.

  • @Oblivion1407
    @Oblivion1407 4 роки тому +21

    Wow, just wow. She is so brave to say it out, and the suggestions she made has great impact on American’s right and democracy.

  • @Kenbomp
    @Kenbomp 4 роки тому +7

    It's just too expensive. It's ridiculousl you need to pay $10k for an invention. It keeps all the public out of invention.

  • @garychristensen8025
    @garychristensen8025 4 роки тому +6

    My doctor told me about another reason for high drug costs. Generic drug manufacturers are bought out by big corporations . The drug prices skyrocket because it costs too much for a "new" generiic masnufacturer to market the drug(s) at a lower price.

  • @roberthurley3941
    @roberthurley3941 4 роки тому +12

    Everything she said was so accurate she is probably a corporate target now. I said stuff like that in high school a week later there were federal agents knocking at my door calling me a Russian spy.

  • @hindsightpov4218
    @hindsightpov4218 4 роки тому +9

    Why are pharmaceutical drugs so expensive? Human greed, you say? 🤯

  • @Kogal4life
    @Kogal4life 4 роки тому +6

    I used to take Imitrex, when the patent expired they wanted to make a new one so they added RX strength naproxen, slightly altered the dose of the imitrex and changed the name. I also used to get free samples of Zipsor (diclofenac in liquid gel cap form.) I get some of my meds through the county where most of the patients are poor and on state insurance and the doctors I have had generally pay little attention the the fact I need cheaper generic drugs. (The state insurance covers these name brands no problem.) Last year I went without a lot of things even generics till I hit my OOP max because a single trip to the pharmacy could cost me $500+

  • @aliezhasa9490
    @aliezhasa9490 3 роки тому +3

    Section 3(d) of the Indian patent act.
    Patent eligibility to a new use or new form of known molecules is denied, unless they contribute to higher therapeutic efficacy over the previous form.
    Derivative of existing substance is considered to be identical to the existing substance except for significance difference in properties in consonance with efficacy

    • @AryanKumar-jr3md
      @AryanKumar-jr3md 2 роки тому

      The Constitution of India does recognize the Right to Health as a fundamental right under Part III of the Constitution (Fundamental Rights). ... Right to life.

  • @koolerpure
    @koolerpure 4 роки тому +4

    it should be globally shamed to put a patent on medicine that could save lives and prevent a single company to determine how greedy they can be and get away with

    • @mayainverse9429
      @mayainverse9429 4 роки тому

      then all of these pharma companies would quit and go make video games instead. but then again what you dont know cant hurt you. all of the drugs they could make but wont will never cause public outrage. 300 years ago when simple illnesses could kill you not a single person complained about drug companies.

  • @black1ight
    @black1ight 4 роки тому +1

    Glad to see people were actually taking note.

  • @kathleenreyes4345
    @kathleenreyes4345 4 роки тому +12

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge! It’s great to understand how the “system” works! This explains a lot!!

  • @iliakaplan
    @iliakaplan 4 роки тому

    Brilliant presentation and content

  • @elinope4745
    @elinope4745 4 роки тому +2

    Some medications cost a ton to fabricate, most do not and are simply overpriced. Some medications cost a lot in research and development, most do not and are simply old drugs rebranded as treating a new symptom. We need to be able to differentiate between these. Some drugs are naturally expensive, but most are just unethically artificially priced high for profit.
    We do need copyright reform.

  • @brokenwizards9122
    @brokenwizards9122 4 роки тому +1

    Best Ted talk I’ve seen in a while. Smart lady.

  • @Cecil381
    @Cecil381 4 роки тому

    Thank you for being you.

  • @wetokebitcoins1769
    @wetokebitcoins1769 4 роки тому +6

    This is a good one

  • @DorthyVonDotz
    @DorthyVonDotz 4 роки тому +2

    Amazing , truly amazing

  • @susiebenson
    @susiebenson 2 роки тому

    Wow and thank you.

  • @inzagwa
    @inzagwa 4 роки тому +2

    We also need to be able to categorize and sub-categorize different patents to have different rule sets. To separate out things like literature from character or mascot designs, or a pharmaceutical's chemical formula from new packaging or delivery methods. Aspirin is still Aspirin regardless of if it's a tablet, gel-cap or some pressure injecting shot from a scifi. The difference between a regular gelcap and a time release one, I can see there being a large enough difference between them for a patent; but not for using a slightly different type of gel or design with marginal improvements.

  • @dnguyen787
    @dnguyen787 4 роки тому +4

    It seems like a big problem! How come US legislators haven't done anything about it???

    • @CheezMonsterCrazy
      @CheezMonsterCrazy 4 роки тому

      They generally benefit from it, as most politicians rely on corporate donors to fund their election campaigns.

    • @neen42
      @neen42 4 роки тому +1

      Pharmaceutical companies are major contributors to their campaigns. $$$

    • @dnguyen787
      @dnguyen787 4 роки тому

      @@neen42 Maybe we should find out which lawmakers accepting their contributions, then vote them out.

  • @TheDarivan
    @TheDarivan 4 роки тому +3

    Bravo!!!

  • @theapplefallk.1377
    @theapplefallk.1377 4 роки тому

    Well said

  • @SimpleTek
    @SimpleTek 4 роки тому

    great ted talk.

  • @Siinestro
    @Siinestro 4 роки тому +2

    Changes in patent system are not the only way to ensure treatment for everyone. Look at GB or Germany for example. Everyone gets the medicine they need, even it is expensive. People matter not money.

  • @craigkesner3904
    @craigkesner3904 4 роки тому +1

    Please address the Insurance companies and Tort Reform in driving up costs.

  • @Vihanva
    @Vihanva 4 роки тому +5

    Greed is the problem. Economy is focusing on money, not wealth. Health is wealth. Politics is a problem. Corruption. Greed. Shortsighted ruthless people. Bah..

    • @BenTheThird
      @BenTheThird 4 роки тому

      @Super Saber This is the stupidest thing I've read all month.

  • @PaulSmith-pf2uq
    @PaulSmith-pf2uq 4 роки тому +3

    Big pharmas should be exterminated. What a cruel monstrosity a big pharmaceutical company is.

  • @ebentee
    @ebentee 4 роки тому +6

    I love how she first smile

  • @yourmajesty3569
    @yourmajesty3569 4 роки тому +2

    There's so many good TED talks that have great ideas and concepts, but it assumes that there isn't a company wanting to make more money. For themselves, or shareholders. Greed will always exist. That's the real problem here.

    • @mayainverse9429
      @mayainverse9429 4 роки тому

      yes. it is called humanity. and that is why capitalism is so great. in the old days to gain wealth and power you just stole stuff from others. now in order to gain wealth and power you create a factory or invent a new product that makes everyones lives better.

  • @vilesh8543
    @vilesh8543 4 роки тому +4

    Feels brave for Ted for allowing her to speak mystery in pharma world. Almost everyone burns themselves to top medical exams. Once they become pro they fell prey to wealth fame at the cost of patients. Solution is meditation for soul awareness. Just try for once. Best wishes.

  • @smithymcsmithface
    @smithymcsmithface 4 роки тому +5

    Need a 'love' instead of a thumbs up. So glad we have the NHS in UK and the Drug Tariff.
    During the financial crisis, I served an American chap who said it was insane that his private prescription for antibiotics cost him £5 instead of over £100. He wanted to rant, but we fund five patients for the cost the Americans fund one.

  • @miraakibaakib6774
    @miraakibaakib6774 4 роки тому

    She is so so good, I wish I was like her

  • @albertfeyen5872
    @albertfeyen5872 4 роки тому +2

    The problem is NOT with the patent laws, the problem is with the GREDY pharmaceutical corporations. We need to make laws that limit the costs of pharmaceuticals to give the companies reasonable profits.

  • @Pharmacychecker
    @Pharmacychecker 3 роки тому

    Vetted international online pharmacies are just as safe as domestic ones - but a lot cheaper. In many cases, the exact same medicine sold here, such as those you may find at a local Walgreens or CVS, costs 90% less from an international online pharmacy.

  • @Wardracing19
    @Wardracing19 3 роки тому

    Does anyone have a link to her study she talks about @ 4:06

  • @whatsupdate
    @whatsupdate 4 роки тому +5

    If you want a lower Rx cost, go to a single payer system where rates are negotiated, and approved drugs are limited to those proven effective in a cost effective manner. Then you don’t need to reform patents at all.

  • @benajmingrasic
    @benajmingrasic 4 роки тому +2

    Im not sure but I dont feel like we have those problems in my country in the EU. But of curse I could be wrong.

  • @FredoCorleone
    @FredoCorleone 4 роки тому

    The fact that the new technology has to be an order of magnitude better for adption is a law of the market due to the cost of transition from the old to the new. I think the idea that to issue a new patent on something it has to be significantly better makes a huge sense.

  • @ramank777
    @ramank777 4 роки тому

    How should significantly better be defined when it comes to patents? Do you think patents should be based on the foundations of HTA? (Eg cost effectiveness) as a society we don’t align on the definition for magnitude of benefit (eg 1 month vs yrs).

  • @1gaymofo
    @1gaymofo 4 роки тому +6

    I hope this system changes to an open source system and rejects the belief system in money

  • @7mirokuff
    @7mirokuff 4 роки тому

    i love selfless acts for the people by the people... thanks for fighting for good

  • @fardinmun8130
    @fardinmun8130 4 роки тому

    Why there are not any competition if there are too many patents ?

  • @dsjanc
    @dsjanc 4 роки тому +16

    Greed

  • @joydipghosh4516
    @joydipghosh4516 2 роки тому

    Love it

  • @aspookyfox
    @aspookyfox 3 роки тому

    So glad I clicked on this.

  • @Stephen981cs
    @Stephen981cs Рік тому

    PBMs are the main drivers for high drug prices. Ask any congressmen. These middlemen are gouging the consumers. If they were representing the patients they could negotiate lower prices. But due to their rebate kickbacks, they are incentivized to promote higher drug prices.

  • @rabinniroula5201
    @rabinniroula5201 4 роки тому +4

    came here to learn why the cocaine I bought last night was expensive
    learned about the outdated patent system and other things

  • @SR-di1qr
    @SR-di1qr 4 роки тому

    Andrew Yang is the best candidate to tackle this problem. His policy of $100 Democracy Dollars for voters to use to donate to any candidate they want will wash out the lobbyists money. She sounds like Andrew Yang. 🙏

  • @Lonoty
    @Lonoty 4 роки тому

    Ok, good. I'm sold on this. Now what? We know what we want, but what can we do? I'm not a US citizen so it would be even harder for me to change US laws, but still. What can me or other people do to change this? This is a good cause, but I would like concrete propositions about what can be done to help. I have a limited amount of time I can spend thinking about this. Can someone with more time, think about this and propose ideas? There are to many wars to fight and not enough time.

  • @DeDraconis
    @DeDraconis 4 роки тому +3

    Good ideas, but one needs to be careful with "more oversight." Fortunately what she described was more about additional transparency, which is good.

  • @jesusanchorofmysoulkatheri3648
    @jesusanchorofmysoulkatheri3648 4 роки тому

    Yikes so unjust!!

  • @mayainverse9429
    @mayainverse9429 4 роки тому

    ..... she proved herself in her own speech it is not outdated its just not being enforced properly. although it is a bit more complicated than that also. originally when our patent system was designed inventors were really just small scale innovators you made a new drug in a tiny lab or you made a new device in your garage. nowadays the level of investment required for new things is in the billions and that only counts for a success what about the nearly limitless number of failed projects that also cost many hundreds of millions of dollars.

  • @yoppindia
    @yoppindia 4 роки тому

    Compulsory licencing for all the critical drugs.

  • @mrmike2119
    @mrmike2119 4 роки тому +9

    Interesting thoughts, and I'm sure truly sincere. Unfortunately sincerely simplistic. The heads of pharmacy corporations should face criminal charges just like a back alley crack dealer.

    • @CheezMonsterCrazy
      @CheezMonsterCrazy 4 роки тому

      That is an even less realistic idea.

    • @LoreLeclerc
      @LoreLeclerc 4 роки тому

      I agree that they should be held responsible for the deaths their decisions directly caused- however, I don't think prison is the answer. The only reason to physically isolate someone from society is if they are a physical danger to others. They are only a moral danger, for being absolute psychopaths. Reparations to the families of the deceased should be made from the decision maker's personal accounts, even if it bankrupts them, and they should absolutely be forced to resign and barred from any positions which hold power over other human beings from then on. They do not care enough about others for that kind of responsibility. Sadly, this is a pipe dream as well, because money is power.

  • @pondholloworchards
    @pondholloworchards 4 роки тому +1

    Because we consent that's why and the only reason why

  • @AndyArthurArts
    @AndyArthurArts 4 роки тому +3

    Somethings are just so confusing in life,but we need to be wise.💝

  • @Mattstiless
    @Mattstiless 4 роки тому +3

    Cuz legalize Colorado that’s why

  • @aarondevon8144
    @aarondevon8144 4 роки тому

    If someone invents something even if it’s vital shouldn’t they be able to have a patent for life?
    Or no patents what so ever , but no compromises!

  • @codacreator6162
    @codacreator6162 4 роки тому

    We used to fund medical research thru taxes supporting university medical centers. But since, we've privatized the research in the false belief that doing so would both encourage efficiency and streamline costs, we've ended up where we are. What's worse is we're still providing government money for research only now it goes into private hands for the development of drugs they feel will have the greatest potential for profit rather than those treatments that we need most as a society. Stop with the no more taxes BS, people. The pittance you pay is not the thing killing your financial security. Your employer underpaying you is the problem.

  • @fauzanadzimi2453
    @fauzanadzimi2453 4 роки тому

    please add Indonesian subtitles

  • @halo8783
    @halo8783 4 роки тому

    Private healthcare instead of public healthcare is why.

  • @DavidBStedman
    @DavidBStedman 4 роки тому

    ummm...no. Its the threee L's....Liability, litigation and lawyers

  • @jdice6868
    @jdice6868 3 роки тому +1

    The pharmaceutical industry is influencing people who believe in capitalism to believe that if it is good for the company, it is good for capitalism. That's not true when what is good for the company is a new patent approval for an old drug that allows them to avoid competing with the generic production of a drug like insulin. Capitalism depends on competition keeping prices down. You used to get 7 years to recuperate costs and make profits by controlling prices before competing with generic production to make profits with increased sales vs. increased prices per sale. Then it was 14 years, 20 years, and so on. Now there's no firm end date. Don't be fooled because they say it's socialism to make them work to deserve increased prices and patent extensions. In fact, it is capitalism to ensure they work for profits. They just hope you won't think about it.

  • @Finger85
    @Finger85 4 роки тому +1

    not in this world

  • @AzEagletarian
    @AzEagletarian 4 роки тому

    Monopolies SUCK!

  • @mikedonnarumma5337
    @mikedonnarumma5337 4 роки тому

    people are second to profit,

  • @jedics1
    @jedics1 4 роки тому

    Another story of corporations paying the right people to make even more money at the expense of the very lives of billions.... And I bet they still make their mothers proud how well they have done for themselves.

  • @petervajda1864
    @petervajda1864 4 роки тому +1

    If you put it 1.25 faster she talks normal

  • @viorelbirsan7487
    @viorelbirsan7487 4 роки тому +1

    Drug or Drugs, I am confuse...🤔
    Could somebody help me, please?

  • @traptown2585
    @traptown2585 4 роки тому +1

    TED

  • @jesseg9088
    @jesseg9088 4 роки тому +1

    Allopathic medicine. Genesis. J. P. Morgan. 😳

  • @1gaymofo
    @1gaymofo 4 роки тому +4

    Have to watch the whole thing to be the first view

  • @mayainverse9429
    @mayainverse9429 4 роки тому

    she got some things right. and some things wrong.

  • @ripto2964
    @ripto2964 3 роки тому

    if you put her on 1.5 speed she sounds normal

  • @GoodBoy-qf5ui
    @GoodBoy-qf5ui 4 роки тому

    She is a bright and good looking girl.

  • @zerojee6236
    @zerojee6236 4 роки тому

    Answer, "Because people are innately greedy assholes."

  • @mmokhtabad
    @mmokhtabad 4 роки тому

    You can't do it. The riches they do lobby to even remove this video

  • @rickster100100
    @rickster100100 4 роки тому +2

    Four people came on first. How is that possible? Hey you Grand Four!!!! Did you each want a cookie? 🤣🤣

    • @tiffanyvalencia8415
      @tiffanyvalencia8415 4 роки тому

      You might have received notification of this video a little later than they did.

    • @rickster100100
      @rickster100100 4 роки тому

      Tiffany Valencia That’s probably true. I meant my Carmen has a bit of humor. So thank you for commenting. Take care.

  • @philipmcginty9708
    @philipmcginty9708 4 роки тому

    Nuts

  • @jayd.o.t
    @jayd.o.t 4 роки тому +7

    Weed on the cheap anyone

  • @georgeburns1058
    @georgeburns1058 4 роки тому +1

    Drug prices so high because they are Illegal..hence M13 and Cartels controls..¿ IDK. jokes for sale. ;)

  • @stevedeweysmith
    @stevedeweysmith 4 роки тому +2

    Drug price are expensive because of Government interference in the free market. The same is true with College education. The more centralized control by Government where it does not belong, the more harm is done to our society.

  • @bkfromtherockies
    @bkfromtherockies 4 роки тому +2

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but last I checked the US Patent Office has no control over what a patent owner(s) and the free market does to the price of an invention after it has been patented. Her speech is nice and inspirational, but I can't see how the US patent system can control the price of an invention brought to the free market for sale. BK

    • @fionafiona1146
      @fionafiona1146 4 роки тому +1

      Enforcing injustice is injustice, look at the UK, they only offer pattern protection when it is assumed to be to public benifit.
      Bullying other countries into the same is even worse... American empire be like.

    • @billlondon6414
      @billlondon6414 4 роки тому

      I do hope that China has the same idea too! Unfortunately,it will be a long way to go…药物价格虚高真的让好多家庭放弃了治疗!

    • @jarrodbrecht7002
      @jarrodbrecht7002 4 роки тому

      Patent office has a huge impact on prices.

    • @DestroIABM
      @DestroIABM 4 роки тому

      The USPTO doesn't test for efficacy only novelty or non obviousness. There are no labs or facilities to do so. The Office generally believes the inventor that they invented a thing. The FDA tests for efficacy. Go talk to them

  • @jrusselison
    @jrusselison 2 роки тому

    Though I think she is a good person, I think she does not really know about the invention process or business.

  • @crankyfox
    @crankyfox 6 місяців тому

    Abolish patents.

  • @patmorley4396
    @patmorley4396 4 роки тому +1

    5:25: "The pharmaceutical industry isn't the bad guy."
    6:41 until 7.03: "O rly?"
    No good telling people to blame the laws and not the companies when the companies are the reason those laws are in place because of their lobbying.

  • @alfarouqaminufor3892
    @alfarouqaminufor3892 3 роки тому

    Everytime someone says "back in the Kennedys administration"
    Me: oh so that's why he was killed.

  • @TheMrfrodough
    @TheMrfrodough 4 роки тому

    Nice ideas but our political system is completely corrupt, those ideas won't happen.

  • @tiffanyvalencia8415
    @tiffanyvalencia8415 4 роки тому +2

    It's not just the patent system, it's that the U.S. is paying more to make up for all the discounts other nations get that Americans don't get.

    • @MadMax-ye2ye
      @MadMax-ye2ye 4 роки тому

      She is talking only about patents because her agenda is to co sign Americans by accepting the idea of buying generic exported drugs from India, so her indian relatives can export non patented drugs to US and put peoples lives at risk and become rich

    • @starventure
      @starventure 4 роки тому

      Tiffany Valencia You have no idea how correct you are. For all intensive purposes, Americans are subsidizing the rest of the world by paying so much.

    • @tiffanyvalencia8415
      @tiffanyvalencia8415 4 роки тому

      @@starventure yep, thank you. And thankfully President Trump is in the works trying to deregulate and "transparentize" this industry...just waiting on the House full of idiots to do their jobs.

  • @milosveljkovic4720
    @milosveljkovic4720 4 роки тому

    Not the talk I thought it'd be. Clickbait

  • @jamesmoriarty9433
    @jamesmoriarty9433 4 роки тому +1

    "34 million Americans lost a family member or a friend"
    Right, so these aren't the people who are actually affected. Way to tug at the heartstrings to support your claim. Couldn't be less relevant.
    "Rising drug costs are pushing families into homelessness, seniors into bankruptcy, and parents to crowdfunding treatment for their critically-ill children"
    Well, it's a good thing these people you say can't afford their drugs are able to take advantage of existing healthcare and financial handouts. No one in this country is homeless unless they choose to be. Yes, if you make poor decisions that lead to you not being able to leech off of the system anymore, that's on you. As for the seniors? They, like all Americans, should make responsible financial decisions, instead of relying on the government to hand them social security checks because they couldn't be bothered to save for retirement.
    As far as your point on the patents being extended beyond their limits, yes, this seems wrong when you don't take into account the costs in making these drugs. Often times, they will not be approved, resulting in hundreds of millions to billions of dollars in losses for these companies. If there is no motivation to make these drugs, then it won't happen. The companies everyone likes to hate, the pharmaceutical companies, are not in the business of making medicine out of the kindness of their hearts, and wasting their money that they earned from the businesses they built.
    "In *India,* my organization worked with patient advocates to challenge, legally, unjust drug patents."
    The HIV problem in India doesn't even compare to the United States, where people do in fact have social safety nets that allow people to live. Not if they have cancer and some other diseases, but that's what health insurance is for.
    Not liking the cost of health insurance does not entitle you to get it for free. You should have been more responsible. Instead of going to Starbuck's and McDonald's every day, getting name brand clothes, and "needing" the new iPhone every year, buy health insurance. You get to live like a rich person/Z/They/Apache Attack Helicopter or whatever pronoun you decide to use that day, when you can afford it. Time to grow up.
    Try me, Bernie bros.

  • @1gaymofo
    @1gaymofo 4 роки тому +4

    It’s about capitalists and protecting the belief system in money

    • @dupolot55
      @dupolot55 4 роки тому

      No my friend. Dont you try to put any politocall discourse in here. Especially if you do t know what you ar talking about. Reed more my friend. Theres no capitalism in USA. Honk kong and singapur are probably only countries in world close to capitalism. Read a little bit more. Capitalism in USA finished 60 years ago.

  • @mmokhtabad
    @mmokhtabad 4 роки тому +2

    Bernie 2020 is the solution.

  • @godsperfectfailures796
    @godsperfectfailures796 4 роки тому +1

    1st

  • @cadehall6464
    @cadehall6464 4 роки тому +1

    First

  • @StephanieElizabethMann
    @StephanieElizabethMann 4 роки тому

    The story of capitalism and greed. People and companies scrabbling after the money they can make from.... Not their inventiveness but their lawyers skillful manipulation of a system. The love of money and the power over others. What a sad little world we have become.

  • @emreturunc457
    @emreturunc457 4 роки тому +2

    Çöp

  • @sankettalvekar3890
    @sankettalvekar3890 4 роки тому

    She looks like Indian, doesn't she? I am from India...btw

    • @PrathamZ
      @PrathamZ 4 роки тому

      her name is priti..i dont think its chinese or american name...or does it????

    • @sankettalvekar3890
      @sankettalvekar3890 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah.. That's what i think... She might be american borned of Indian Origin...