The fact that Forbes are getting into them so early on the journey means he may be doing something that threatens the big players? Why wasn’t FTX or Theranos given the same treatment!
It's Forbes. They would sell their own parents if it they could. Of course when the unofficial deal with Midjourney was made they joined the hate campaign on Stable Diffusion.
The written version of this article apparently did not mention that Emad's Bachelor's degree would have converted into a Masters automatically had he applied for it (its automatic from Oxford and Cambridge, a fact well known by anyone from England). I have to confess I thought I had a Masters in Math from Cambridge but I guess i only have a Bachelors! Bummer! This omission in the written version of the article - assuming I have that right - represents embellishment on the part of Forbes IMHO. The authors must have known about this.
he opensource model used by many platform like midjourney which used some of stability ai models. he is promoting decentralized and open source model unlike microsoft and google. lot of people in the industry. Don't like his opensource approach
People questioning Stable Diffusion have to understand that the project is open source. anyone can use it, change it, modify it. it is a public service for the world, all you have to do is be smart enough, which seems to me the old giant 'forbes' is not, and hasn't been for a while... Pitiful, how the mighty have fallen.
@@707kat8 is there any lawsuit against him for open sourcing it? He paid for the computing resources that allowed the model to be as comprehensive and powerful as it has become. So, he is part owner of the model anyway. It was initially started as a university research and now some of the key developers are working for him.
@@707kat8yeah, they should've been one of many closed source proprietary AI services devs that also use data from the web, BUT no one would ever know about it. Praise Sam Altman(OpenAI DALL-E) and David Holz(Midjourney) for not showing people the truth! Edit: also, they didn't make the dataset. LAION did. They trained a model on publicly available open source dataset.
Oh ye luddites 😅 As if anything anyone learns is from within themselves. Learning happens always from the outside inwards. Same goes for AI. Same goes for the artists whose work got included in the training data. It matters not. Or are we to start harassing all artists for the fact that they have learned art from and been influenced by their teachers and other artists?
We all know they are doing Emad like this because he made it open source! Why no press about David at MJ and him not even mentioning he used Stability to train v1? I'm just saying yall don't play fair and its noticeable.
Forbes logic: use public data to train an open source model - straight to jail; use the same public data to train a paid, proprietary AI service - NUMBER ONE PERSON 2023!
Its not open source. The OpenRAIL-M license is open-source-like. Yannic Kilcher explained in his video how deceptive and restrictive the license is. For example they have a clause where you have to "put reasonable efforts" to use the latest version and many other restrictions.
Well, this was a reach. The nature of business is exaggeration. I've heard nothing shady in this interview and after watching a few of Emad's interviews before this, he does not have an overly grandiose personality about him, always seems very calm and attentive, and answers questions in a straightforward and informative manner.
This was a petty attempt. Emad is doing big time stuff - and leading a huge organization - if anyone wants to find some dirt on any organization, they will. None of this info led me to take Emad any less seriously in terms of his message about AI, or what he's creating.
Why does forbes keep pushing this story despite being discredited so many times? You can literally just ask the authors of Stable Diffusion if they feel the same way.
Because people despise crack pot scientists? Dude is a walking talking scam. Remember Theranos? Emad gives out, Elizabeth Holmes vibes when he talks. Why don’t you invest in stability ai, if you feel this way?
Emad's and StabilityAI's value for opensource generative models is one of the biggest in the world, hardly overstated. Even with this "discrepancies" which are exaggerated too (automatic conversion Bachelor's degree into Master's etc.) StabilityAI created a solid base for further open source research, which I am truly thankful for.
@@kshitizaggarwal1 Look at your rfirst comment on this thread - did you explain the ratinale behind it? Notice your own hypocrisy and do something about it. Start with yourself and follow your own advice.
I've listened to the Emad's interview with Tom Bilyeu on YT. He sounded highly knowledgeable on a wide variety of topics. Didn't come off as dumb or a conman.
This guy is taking on Billion Dollar companies by Pushing Open Source for his AI Company which is btw doing so much in the industry to actually do that.
Stable Diffusion, released in 2022, is a product of collaborative effort by researchers from the CompVis Group at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and Runway, with support from Stability AI and non-profit organizations providing training data. The model utilizes a latent diffusion model, a type of deep generative neural network, to generate detailed images based on text descriptions.
Well that was certainly soft hitting! It was almost about nothing. Probs make a good meditation soundtrack, quite soothing. I like how he softly and nicely, almost passively tried to diminish Emad..... like a smiling assassin! I always laugh at these types of pieces, if someone did a deep dive into my life and poured over all that I am in the flesh, I'd be toast lol
I saw a clip of him and he stuck out as abit of a bser. However I don’t know enough about him to have a valid opinion. I think this piece is abit petty but also think it’s great to hold someone accountable for straight up lying. And when y’all in the comments are done making a hero out of this man we can start holding ppl accountable. What would be great would be an exposé on all the tech ‘geniuses’ that have stolen credit. That’s overdue
Are you familiar with AI or generative models? Stability AI's model is open source, so you can actually check if it's BS or not. Too bad, you will never understand. lol, it's ironic a NFT bro would paint an AI researcher as a "fraud"😂
”stuck out as…” what? Listen to what he is saying, man. Watch the Impact Theory interview for example. Pay attention - there is a good reason why Forbes is trying to discredit him
@@blackmamba9950 lol not an NFT bro at all I don't even advocate for it. NFTs taught me to look at my work differently and that's what I share with others becos artists are not taught to value their own work. I didn't say he was a fraud I said my 1st impression was he was abit of a bser. again I don't have a valid opinion cos I haven't taken time to research him. I even said I felt this video was abit petty, so almost defending him actually. Just like NFTs I'm not for or against Ai I just think artists should learn what these technologies are - However Ai models that scrape art without artists consent (open source or not) is something I will always b critical of and I think is leaving a bad taste for the adoption of generative AI. I think models that are trained by the artists and then licensed by the artists is a future I'm looking forward to being a part of.
@@alpha0xide9 will check it out thank you, I have't looked into him enough to be able to have a valid opinion. But I saw an interview with him saying Ai will be a 'creative revolution' and will 'unlock creativity'. Personally I'm tired of tech making bold claims and using core values to placate their products on. That often causes as much harm as they innovate. Diffusion is interesting tech but if it costs the artists then it's not a creative revolution for me. Artists have been doing amazing without Ai and that's why it felt like bs to me. But will look more into him I have no right to judge at this point
@@blackmamba9950 Its not open source. The OpenRAIL-M license is open-source-like. Yannic Kilcher explained in his video how deceptive and restrictive the license is.
This is literally the founder's journey. Try and try... and try again until you succeed. Most give up, some lie (Theranos). And very few actually make it big which is why unicorns are rare. But of you make something tangible that people actually use you can't fake that. SD is a great product that millions use, and it free and better than most of the competition.
Leonardo uses SD. Midjourney is too closed to know, but they all did zero contribution to the world, while Stable Diffusion is a base for thousands of models. Do some research on AI, "Artificial Intellect"
Just watch Emad 2 hours long interview with Tom released couple of hours ago. He sounds like the kind of genius we need, for our future healthcare, education…
not a genius. Kind of a sociopathic type who talks a show. Could lead to all sorts of problems when AI can't deliver even a small percentage of the positives he has no idea how to actually create.
So the presenter speaks at length.....with tension creating marimba accompaniment...... and THE TRUTH is silently presented on white cards people must read ? Biased journalism?
It's called being an entrepreneur who makes things happen. All the naysayers are keyboard warriors who theorize but don't have the qualities Emad has to execute. Emad is opening doors for AI, give him credit
Back then, the art ai that could produce realistic images was only for research. The ai was dall e 2, and you had to get on a waiting list in order to see it because of the risk of the ai generating a highly disturbing image. There was a pdf book that explained possible ways of the ai going wrong from bigotry to what I discussed, highly disturbing imagery. This man in the video is the main reason for the ai art controversy. Stability ai was the FIRST to commercialize art ai. This man takes the credit for the stability ai commercialization. Witch means, HE the one to blame solely for the copyright controversies on art ai. HE wants to exploit artists on a global scale, he is a disgrace for doing such a thing.
Stable Diffusion is leading the way in stolen artwork. The very first time I used it I got a beautiful watercolor with the original artist's signature still clearly visible at the bottom. They are being sued for delivering images clearly sporting Getty images watermark across the image. These are stolen works. Its not genius it is theft.
Forbes are questionable. Check their headlines on crypto, in particular crypto and you will see they are pushing a consistent theme of doom and gloom for Bitcoin and other themes.
How about openai being a non profit for chairity and raising millions claiming it’s for ai safety then suddenly turning to a private ownership for profit😅😅😅 invastigate that Forbes oh sorry you wouldn’t dare…. so just shush and leave this hipocracy aside
Anyone talking so grand about philanthropy and AI at the same time should be making everyone suspicious… classic BS example and people should be having a better look at him
What about acknowledging the positive impact he's making on disadvantaged kids? It seems Forbes' portrayal lacks substantial evidence to consider the extensive contributions he has made making available the technology for the benefit of others. It's essential to recognize that Forbes' stance might be influenced by bias, which can result in a subjective perspective. Given his intelligence and the transformative nature of his initiatives, it's possible that certain established institutions like Forbes might feel threatened by what he’s doing. It’s a bit rich saying he’s exaggerating. Thank you for sharing an opinion piece, but it's crucial to approach such information with a discerning eye, considering potential biases and the lack of concrete evidence in the provided content. What next for Forbes? Talking about Elon musk and trying to character assassinate him too?? .
As usual, is like all new kid on the block come in and say a lot off things to lure others, like "Ohh I've heard rumors saying that google is building a game platform that you don't need even a video game console at home, they call it Stadia..."
I'm nobody but I own my own company with no real background in higher education but continued my education with free online courses. Getting 40 -120k in debt for a knowledgeable credibility certificate doesn't make you smart. Who owns credibility in crypto or blockchain, someone had a theory on the internet 15 years ago and published a paper on it. Yet people are experts now in the field of blockchain even though it's been around for 15 years and popular for 7? Makes no sense you would get a degree in the field of blockchain tech when the professors didn't even think it was possible. Then you pay 30-60k for that degree when all you had to do was go online download some research papers and look into it yourself? I would say Emad Mostaque is pretty smart for what he's doing, and Forbes trying to take away credibility from him is in fact pretty sad. Why doesn't Forbes look into Blackstone's firm and employees there? - Forbes is a joke!
The fact that Forbes are getting into them so early on the journey means he may be doing something that threatens the big players? Why wasn’t FTX or Theranos given the same treatment!
It's Forbes. They would sell their own parents if it they could. Of course when the unofficial deal with Midjourney was made they joined the hate campaign on Stable Diffusion.
Maybe they learned form FTX and Theranos?
The written version of this article apparently did not mention that Emad's Bachelor's degree would have converted into a Masters automatically had he applied for it (its automatic from Oxford and Cambridge, a fact well known by anyone from England). I have to confess I thought I had a Masters in Math from Cambridge but I guess i only have a Bachelors! Bummer!
This omission in the written version of the article - assuming I have that right - represents embellishment on the part of Forbes IMHO. The authors must have known about this.
he opensource model used by many platform like midjourney which used some of stability ai models. he is promoting decentralized and open source model unlike microsoft and google.
lot of people in the industry. Don't like his opensource approach
People questioning Stable Diffusion have to understand that the project is open source. anyone can use it, change it, modify it. it is a public service for the world, all you have to do is be smart enough, which seems to me the old giant 'forbes' is not, and hasn't been for a while... Pitiful, how the mighty have fallen.
It's open sourced data that wasn't theirs to opensource. And I hope that he goes to jail together with the rest of them.
@@707kat8 is there any lawsuit against him for open sourcing it? He paid for the computing resources that allowed the model to be as comprehensive and powerful as it has become. So, he is part owner of the model anyway. It was initially started as a university research and now some of the key developers are working for him.
@@707kat8 this point right here. everyone applauds it for being open source but who was it trained on and who walks away with the bag
@@707kat8yeah, they should've been one of many closed source proprietary AI services devs that also use data from the web, BUT no one would ever know about it. Praise Sam Altman(OpenAI DALL-E) and David Holz(Midjourney) for not showing people the truth!
Edit: also, they didn't make the dataset. LAION did. They trained a model on publicly available open source dataset.
Oh ye luddites 😅
As if anything anyone learns is from within themselves. Learning happens always from the outside inwards. Same goes for AI. Same goes for the artists whose work got included in the training data. It matters not. Or are we to start harassing all artists for the fact that they have learned art from and been influenced by their teachers and other artists?
We all know they are doing Emad like this because he made it open source! Why no press about David at MJ and him not even mentioning he used Stability to train v1? I'm just saying yall don't play fair and its noticeable.
Forbes logic: use public data to train an open source model - straight to jail; use the same public data to train a paid, proprietary AI service - NUMBER ONE PERSON 2023!
Its not open source. The OpenRAIL-M license is open-source-like. Yannic Kilcher explained in his video how deceptive and restrictive the license is. For example they have a clause where you have to "put reasonable efforts" to use the latest version and many other restrictions.
Well, this was a reach. The nature of business is exaggeration. I've heard nothing shady in this interview and after watching a few of Emad's interviews before this, he does not have an overly grandiose personality about him, always seems very calm and attentive, and answers questions in a straightforward and informative manner.
This was a petty attempt. Emad is doing big time stuff - and leading a huge organization - if anyone wants to find some dirt on any organization, they will. None of this info led me to take Emad any less seriously in terms of his message about AI, or what he's creating.
People don't seem to understand that *startups are messy*, if it were easy, everyone would do it
Indeed.
Who doesn’t have a history of exaggeration. Elon , Bill, Zuck. This is a Smear campaign because Emad is probably not the right Shade
How is Elon's Hyperloop going by the way?
This will age like milk. People are questioning forbes 30 under 30 instead
He's going to get his degree in July..... and that's the core allegation of this desperate hitpiece ?
"He didn't get it yet"
Geez Forbes.
If he is willing to lie about his credentials, what else is he lying about?
Interesting how the tech is never questioned. One could write an article such as this about Musk as well
lol exactly.
Of course he does, he talks like a typical BSer, but these days all AI news sound like pure exaggeration, it's madness.
that's all I'm saying🙌
You think the possibilities of AI is exaggeration? lol
Why does forbes keep pushing this story despite being discredited so many times? You can literally just ask the authors of Stable Diffusion if they feel the same way.
Because people despise crack pot scientists? Dude is a walking talking scam. Remember Theranos? Emad gives out, Elizabeth Holmes vibes when he talks. Why don’t you invest in stability ai, if you feel this way?
Absolutely : biased and flimsy.
There are many people who don’t want real open source product. Such products are tread for their business!
Can’t have these visionaries out here pushing for open source and shaking up the established power structure within industry.
@@Myke664
Disruptive Technologies = the focus of Silicon Valley
Emad's and StabilityAI's value for opensource generative models is one of the biggest in the world, hardly overstated. Even with this "discrepancies" which are exaggerated too (automatic conversion Bachelor's degree into Master's etc.) StabilityAI created a solid base for further open source research, which I am truly thankful for.
Forbes always has an agenda. My guess is because Mostaque has been making the rounds promoting open source AI.
This is a weak biased hitpiece.
Comes across more as a hit-piece than an unbiased examination. I wonder why
Nope it doesn't
@@kshitizaggarwal1 Looks like it. And intelligent people can see it clearly. But if you disagree, explain away or keep yourr head in the sand.
@Corteum you posted your opinion on a public forum, without explanation/rationale behind it. Someone else did the same...why worked up
@@kshitizaggarwal1 Look at your rfirst comment on this thread - did you explain the ratinale behind it? Notice your own hypocrisy and do something about it. Start with yourself and follow your own advice.
@@Corteum haha yours was the first comment here, not mine.
I've listened to the Emad's interview with Tom Bilyeu on YT. He sounded highly knowledgeable on a wide variety of topics. Didn't come off as dumb or a conman.
if the media is attacking him he must be doing something right
Flawless logic 😩
Your a genius Prithviye. Congratulations to you
This flimsy smear has an agenda.
Didn’t Forbes prop up ftx? Yeah will pass in their judgement.
This guy is taking on Billion Dollar companies by Pushing Open Source for his AI Company which is btw doing so much in the industry to actually do that.
As Forbes cannot see any red flag, it needed to makeup a yellow flag and produced BS! Now we need a real story how Forbes made money out of it.
I don’t even like the guy, but how is he any different than all other BS CEOs? Forbes is making is this dramatic. Why?
There must be something behind this character assassination attempt.
@@AG-et6jp It's failed attempt. The majority wont buy this hit piece bs
its the Dateline NBC background music lol
he is probably making people with big pockets mad.
Especially David Holz and Sam Altman
Many SV start ups had been overvalued and more so failed. Why unnecessary reporting Forbes.
This is a hit piece. If someone has a Bachelors from Oxford but not Masters & then suddenly he's exaggerating ? LoL !!
This dude is drama queen.
Stable Diffusion, released in 2022, is a product of collaborative effort by researchers from the CompVis Group at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and Runway, with support from Stability AI and non-profit organizations providing training data. The model utilizes a latent diffusion model, a type of deep generative neural network, to generate detailed images based on text descriptions.
Well that was certainly soft hitting! It was almost about nothing. Probs make a good meditation soundtrack, quite soothing. I like how he softly and nicely, almost passively tried to diminish Emad..... like a smiling assassin! I always laugh at these types of pieces, if someone did a deep dive into my life and poured over all that I am in the flesh, I'd be toast lol
This is a hit-piece! Why go through all this to harm a man's reputation?
Because in the era of Elizabeth Holmes and George Santos there needs to be investigations.
True. 100% jealousy.
@@Essentia-Channel Why go for some people only though?
@@Essentia-ChannelTrue, but by whom? By forbes ? 😂
@@Essentia-ChannelE Holmes and G Santos didn't open source their stuff.
So much for VC "due diligence". They should hire this guy.
Black Rock already did. This is just a piece to try to discredit Stability.
I wonder the agenda of this entire pieace. Classical BS.
To be honest, it is better to exaggerate in this field to higher the expectations in case of the dangers.
Very interesting, but a little short on the OpenSource part of what is Stability AI, wich I found very democratic to the Jon Do.
I had this feeling after ten minutes of watching him talk
Same here.
100% grandiose talk, 0% proof.
But these days, who knows anymore...
Feelings?
This is biased journalism.
I saw a clip of him and he stuck out as abit of a bser. However I don’t know enough about him to have a valid opinion. I think this piece is abit petty but also think it’s great to hold someone accountable for straight up lying. And when y’all in the comments are done making a hero out of this man we can start holding ppl accountable.
What would be great would be an exposé on all the tech ‘geniuses’ that have stolen credit. That’s overdue
Are you familiar with AI or generative models? Stability AI's model is open source, so you can actually check if it's BS or not. Too bad, you will never understand. lol, it's ironic a NFT bro would paint an AI researcher as a "fraud"😂
”stuck out as…” what? Listen to what he is saying, man. Watch the Impact Theory interview for example. Pay attention - there is a good reason why Forbes is trying to discredit him
@@blackmamba9950 lol not an NFT bro at all I don't even advocate for it. NFTs taught me to look at my work differently and that's what I share with others becos artists are not taught to value their own work.
I didn't say he was a fraud I said my 1st impression was he was abit of a bser. again I don't have a valid opinion cos I haven't taken time to research him. I even said I felt this video was abit petty, so almost defending him actually.
Just like NFTs I'm not for or against Ai I just think artists should learn what these technologies are - However Ai models that scrape art without artists consent (open source or not) is something I will always b critical of and I think is leaving a bad taste for the adoption of generative AI.
I think models that are trained by the artists and then licensed by the artists is a future I'm looking forward to being a part of.
@@alpha0xide9 will check it out thank you, I have't looked into him enough to be able to have a valid opinion. But I saw an interview with him saying Ai will be a 'creative revolution' and will 'unlock creativity'.
Personally I'm tired of tech making bold claims and using core values to placate their products on. That often causes as much harm as they innovate.
Diffusion is interesting tech but if it costs the artists then it's not a creative revolution for me.
Artists have been doing amazing without Ai and that's why it felt like bs to me.
But will look more into him I have no right to judge at this point
@@blackmamba9950 Its not open source. The OpenRAIL-M license is open-source-like. Yannic Kilcher explained in his video how deceptive and restrictive the license is.
Is this the same Forbes magazine who had Elizabeth Holmes on its front page ?
These kinds of reports are going to get fact checked by AI's much smarter than this reporter. lol
WHY SHOULD WE TRUST YOUR VERSION OF THE SOTRY? YOU NEED MORE STRONG REASONS THAN HE SAID SHE SAID. I DON'T TRUST YOU EITHER
This is literally the founder's journey. Try and try... and try again until you succeed. Most give up, some lie (Theranos). And very few actually make it big which is why unicorns are rare. But of you make something tangible that people actually use you can't fake that. SD is a great product that millions use, and it free and better than most of the competition.
Exactly . Fucken exactly. Anyone who doesn’t understand this has never ran a startup.
Fact
Still stable diffusion is not close to lenardo or midjourney
SD is probably more professional.
?
SDXL literally dwarfs Midjourney. If it doesn't, you just need to learn how to use it :)
Leonardo uses SD. Midjourney is too closed to know, but they all did zero contribution to the world, while Stable Diffusion is a base for thousands of models. Do some research on AI, "Artificial Intellect"
Just watch Emad 2 hours long interview with Tom released couple of hours ago. He sounds like the kind of genius we need, for our future healthcare, education…
not a genius. Kind of a sociopathic type who talks a show. Could lead to all sorts of problems when AI can't deliver even a small percentage of the positives he has no idea how to actually create.
It’s nice that you announce in the video title that this is a hit piece
So the presenter speaks at length.....with tension creating marimba accompaniment...... and THE TRUTH is silently presented on white cards people must read ?
Biased journalism?
I have PhD degree and what Emad said just proof how arrogant and desperate entrepreneurs can get to promote their product by spreading fears.😂😂😂
It's called being an entrepreneur who makes things happen. All the naysayers are keyboard warriors who theorize but don't have the qualities Emad has to execute. Emad is opening doors for AI, give him credit
By stealing unlicensed and private data from human creatives. Terrible person.
@@707kat8 there is no stealing if you understand AI
Back then, the art ai that could produce realistic images was only for research. The ai was dall e 2, and you had to get on a waiting list in order to see it because of the risk of the ai generating a highly disturbing image. There was a pdf book that explained possible ways of the ai going wrong from bigotry to what I discussed, highly disturbing imagery.
This man in the video is the main reason for the ai art controversy. Stability ai was the FIRST to commercialize art ai. This man takes the credit for the stability ai commercialization. Witch means, HE the one to blame solely for the copyright controversies on art ai. HE
wants to exploit artists on a global scale, he is a disgrace for doing such a thing.
so basically this is the one guy who didn't pay Forbes for good publicity
Guess who else has a history of exaggeration... Fobes! :) and that's putting things very nicely
This belongs in the E-channel archives. A guy babbling about what ifs and i think this or that.
Okay say what you want about this guy but stable diffusion is leading the way right in AI generated images
Stable Diffusion is leading the way in stolen artwork. The very first time I used it I got a beautiful watercolor with the original artist's signature still clearly visible at the bottom. They are being sued for delivering images clearly sporting Getty images watermark across the image. These are stolen works. Its not genius it is theft.
@@mercedesb2299is there some kind of hate campaign on Stable Diffusion organized by OpenAI, Midjourney and Adobe?
We know why Forbes are doing this! #nottherightshade
Forbes are questionable. Check their headlines on crypto, in particular crypto and you will see they are pushing a consistent theme of doom and gloom for Bitcoin and other themes.
Thank you for the insightful report!
This is a terrible piece.
Dudeeeee, what are you saying ???? He made the product work didn’t he ?? Anything besides that is water under the bridge.
They're gonna be eating their words soon enough. Go woke, get broke! 🤣
Here to comment on his smug af face in the thumbnail
P.S. Rich coming from the people who make the 30 under 30 list
2. This video is so sneaky and is an obvious campaign to black smear the credibility of stability which is an open source platform.
Even better it only has 35k views from 9 months ago lol,, I think people know it’s a hit piece before they even click on it
Wow this is really eye opening. He fooled me. He seemed so pure and genuine to me.
A Bangladeshi guy pulling a fast one on everyone
Forbes has become a joke. Lol.
i had to do a double take like does that say "Forbes" at the bottom of the screen ...intersting , so this is what there doing now lol
He is just like every politician today
No politician ever didn't anger large corporations so much that they started spending billions on social media hate campaigns and bribing mass media.
Based on these comments I can tell this video is BS. Not gonna waste any time watching it.
The BS is that he had a BS from Oxford, not an MS like his linkedin once said. *gasp*
What’s the point for calling his past but he’s create something that never existed
Who is not exagerating . It is called marketing and promotion.
Doesn’t mean it’s ok or they shouldn’t be held accountable
The best innovator on AI are open source collaboration
So you are framing him because he want to build a open source AI which threatens big players, well done Forbes 😂
Forbes can't be trusted. They embellished most of his bio. I have known about him for years. This is the only time he has been bashed.
I know con men when I see it and boy is my spider senses are firing
lol what an obvious hit piece, they just outed themselves, now I can’t believe anything coming out of this channel
Have listened to a few talks with this guy. All sorts of flags for me , can't stand listening to him actually. This explains it all.
this is the Cuevana of AI.
How about openai being a non profit for chairity and raising millions claiming it’s for ai safety then suddenly turning to a private ownership for profit😅😅😅 invastigate that Forbes oh sorry you wouldn’t dare…. so just shush and leave this hipocracy aside
Craptastic piece grasping at straws, are we trying to make up for missing Elizabeth Holmes?
Anyone talking so grand about philanthropy and AI at the same time should be making everyone suspicious… classic BS example and people should be having a better look at him
well, I'm sure this guy boosted his VC to get into Forbes just like 99% of most people
Another Super Genius Level 2. Another one!
Can I also get the 80% standard discount please 😂🎉
it is having trouble raising next round in a very hot time, not a good sign...going down....
0:49 Forbes didn't even bother to local install Stable Diffusion. Peak journalism. Amazing. I'm impressed.
Emad Mostaque turned me into a newt!
Exactly. Specious allegations and silent white card facts
@@MilesBellas I actually know several employees of his, and I think he is a scam artist, and I constantly make fun of him.
@@MilesBellas Emad blocked me after I asked him about his claims that he is feeing 6 million african children
@@MilesBellas He literally got sued for fraud by both his co-founders, its a matter of public record.
@@barberb
Maybe because the "feeing" comment was inaccurate and misquoted?
Emad Mostaque sounds like an incredible guy!
What about acknowledging the positive impact he's making on disadvantaged kids? It seems Forbes' portrayal lacks substantial evidence to consider the extensive contributions he has made making available the technology for the benefit of others. It's essential to recognize that Forbes' stance might be influenced by bias, which can result in a subjective perspective. Given his intelligence and the transformative nature of his initiatives, it's possible that certain established institutions like Forbes might feel threatened by what he’s doing. It’s a bit rich saying he’s exaggerating. Thank you for sharing an opinion piece, but it's crucial to approach such information with a discerning eye, considering potential biases and the lack of concrete evidence in the provided content. What next for Forbes? Talking about Elon musk and trying to character assassinate him too??
.
Oh wait, maybe not him, some other non white tech CEO will be your target!!
Grasping at straws?
Empower Progress.
Ah, another nothing burger! Nom! Nom! Nom!
As usual, is like all new kid on the block come in and say a lot off things to lure others, like "Ohh I've heard rumors saying that google is building a game platform that you don't need even a video game console at home, they call it Stadia..."
What a great way to be sell out to the big players forbes.…🎉
1. How did kenrick conduct his fact check?
Exaggeration??? Why do say that??? Because he is Asian??
Well the reporter is Asian. It's because Emad is South Asian (Bangladeshi)
Whew is he from?
321 hot piece lol 😂
I'm nobody but I own my own company with no real background in higher education but continued my education with free online courses. Getting 40 -120k in debt for a knowledgeable credibility certificate doesn't make you smart.
Who owns credibility in crypto or blockchain, someone had a theory on the internet 15 years ago and published a paper on it. Yet people are experts now in the field of blockchain even though it's been around for 15 years and popular for 7? Makes no sense you would get a degree in the field of blockchain tech when the professors didn't even think it was possible. Then you pay 30-60k for that degree when all you had to do was go online download some research papers and look into it yourself?
I would say Emad Mostaque is pretty smart for what he's doing, and Forbes trying to take away credibility from him is in fact pretty sad.
Why doesn't Forbes look into Blackstone's firm and employees there? - Forbes is a joke!
Just wow
Who is kenrick cai???? Has he started a business before???
Good journalism
Fictional allegations and factual quotes on white cards stating the simple truth isn't good journalism.
How?
Jourrnalism huh? that's a laugh 🤣
Emad = Amazing
Don’t hate the player hate the game
How about hating both?
boooring , also how was this helpfull smh,
:)
forbes
will always be
for boomers by boomers