Відео

looks like Jesus is a false prophet according to Mark

16:12 😂🎉

Fabulous video!

You said many words. I completely lost you. Let me put a wager forward, when you have to do cartwheels to prove your point. Is it really a good point?

(1) God cannot err (2) The Bible is the word of God (3) The Bible cannot err This syllogism is "technically" invalid. There's an implicit premise, namely, that "God" and the "word of God" in this context are identical. (3) does not follow. To make the syllogism valid it would have to say something like the following: (1) The word of God cannot err (2) The Bible is the word of God (3) The Bible cannot err Just a petty observation :)

If Jesus still has a brain he's in time.😮not outside

Worship one God only!

Have an open mind. We understand that if you were on the wrong path, it is difficult to accept the truth and instead you will justify your flawed belief in believing Jesus is God. There's only one God. No lesser God. Just one! Believe in what God tells you to believe in!!!

Read the books of Apostle Paul. He had declared who Jesus is. Be knowledgeable about the bible. Pray to God Almighty that you seek the truth, in the name/with the help mediation of JesusChrist.

God sent Jesus to teach man to know the one true God. Understand that Jesus was sent to make mankind know the one true and God Almighty, has the name YWH, JEHOVA mentioned in the bible.

Know the truth that Jesus is not the Almighty God. In your lie of reasoning, if you see Jesus as God, then Virgin Mary, being the mother of God is also God. See the you become polytheism. That means you are engaging in idolatry, by 32:22 having multiple God's. Know the truth! Not many will be saved because you didn't love and worship the one true God that Jesus wanted you to know and believe in. Let Jesus save you!

God is a spirit and has no material substance. Jesus prayed to God who is greater than him. The devil wants you to see Jesus as God, so that you will not be worshiping the real and true God the Almighty, the God who Jesus, Moses, Jacob, Abraham, and King David prayed to. Don't be deceived by the devil!

Fact check: Jesus didn't pray yo himself. Trinity is a concept/theory fabricated by Roman politicians in collaboration with the prevailing church in the 4th century. Do your research to find the truth. The bible teaches us to know God in spirit and in truth. Be saved!

Probably the best video on youtube re the parousia. Ive never heard the conditional prophesy argument explained so well. Verses like 1 John 2 it is the final hour...beware of antichrists etc, ive always been a partial preterist but realising we dont think like the apostles did often needs hammering home. In the modern world something either is or is not, we dont like to think of ourselves participating in prophesy.

Doesn't the Christian God make morality based on suffering impossible? What does suffering have to do with anything? You just do what God thinks you should do, what does it have to do with evil or suffering. Why is the problem of evil even a problem at all for Christians? It's only a problem from a humanist perspective. Humanist morality is based on limited suffering. Christian morality is based on following God's law, and that has nothing to do with suffering.

Ascension after 40 days - 2 Baruch 76:4, 4 Ezra 14:23, 49 cf. Acts 1:3. Romulus ascended to heaven in a cloud like Jesus in Acts 1:9 as attested in Ovid Metamorphosis 14.805-28, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 2.56.2 and Livy 1.16. More parallels with Romulus. Romulus received "worship" προσκυνέω (proskynesis) and his followers "rejoice" directly after his Ascension: "during which the multitude dispersed and fled, but the nobles gathered closely together; and when the storm had ceased, and the sun shone out, and the multitude, now gathered together again in the same place as before, anxiously sought for their king, the nobles would not suffer them to inquire into his disappearance nor busy themselves about it, but exhorted them all to honour and revere Romulus, since he had been caught up into heaven*, and was to be a benevolent god for them instead of a good king.* The multitude, accordingly, believing this and rejoicing (χαίροντας) in it, went away to worship (προσκυνοῦντας) him with good hopes of his favour; but there were some, it is said, who tested the matter in a bitter and hostile spirit, and confounded the patricians with the accusation of imposing a silly tale upon the people, and of being themselves the murderers of the king." - Plutarch Rom. 27.8 just like Jesus in Lk. 24:51-52: "While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. Then they worshiped (προσκυνήσαντες) him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy (χαρᾶς)." Compare Romulus' great commission speech: "And the shrewd device of one man is also said to have gained new credit for the story. This was Proculus Julius, who, when the people were distracted with the loss of their king and in no friendly mood towards the senate, being, as tradition tells, weighty in council, were the matter never so important, addressed the assembly as follows: “Quirites, the Father of this City, Romulus, descended suddenly from the sky at dawn this morning and appeared to me. Covered with confusion, I stood reverently before him, praying that it might be vouchsafed me to look upon his face without sin. 'Go,' said he, 'and declare to the Romans the will of Heaven that my Rome shall be the capital of the world; so let them cherish the art of war, and let them know and teach their children that no human strength can resist Roman arms.' So saying,” he concluded, “Romulus departed on high.” It is wonderful what credence the people placed in that man's tale, and how the grief for the loss of Romulus, which the plebeians and the army felt, was quieted by the assurance of his immortality." - Livy 1.16.6-7 to Jesus' commission in Mt. 28:16-20: "Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

_"In light of numerous legendary stories about disappearing bodies in antiquity, such as the ascensions of Enoch (Gen. 5.24; Heb. 11.5; 1 En. 70.1-3; 3 En. 6.1; 7.1) and Elijah (2 Kgs 2.11-12, 15-18; Josephus, Ant. 9.28), the disappearance of Moses (Josephus, Ant. 4.323-326), the unsuccessful search for the bodies of Job’s children (T. Job 39.8-40.4), the assumptions of Ezra (4 Ezra 14.9, 48 Syr) and Baruch (2 Bar. 76.1-5), and the disappearances of Romulus (Ovid, Metam. 14.805-851; Plutarch, Rom. 27.7-28.3), Aristeas of Proconnesus (Plutarch, Rom. 28.4; Herodotus, Hist. 4.14-15), and Cleomedes of Astypaleia (Plutarch, Rom. 28.4-5; Pausanias, Descr. 6.9.6-9), the possibility that Mark’s account could be a Christian legend cannot be easily dismissed. While many of these stories concern persons from the distant past or legendary figures, the Dialogues of Gregory the Great (540-640) contain an account about Gregory’s contemporary, a Roman craftsman, who died and was buried in the Church of St Januarius the Martyr. Gregory reports that on the first night after the burial the sacristan heard loud shouting from the burial place. When the dead men’s friends opened the grave, they found his clothes untouched but his body disappeared (Dial. 4.56). Pope Gregory assumes the accuracy of this story and even adds that anyone interested to check its veracity could do so, either by speaking with the witnesses or by examining the site of the burial. This is not just a medieval tale that could be simply brushed away. Matthew’s accounts of the resurrected saints who exited their graves and appeared in Jerusalem after Jesus’ resurrection (Mt. 27.52-53) or the guard at Jesus’ tomb (Mt. 27.62-66; 28.4, 11-15) show that early Christians were capable of inventing stories for theological and apologetic purposes."_ - Lidija Novakovic, Resurrection A Guide for the Perplexed, p. 138 _"The seventh argument impresses me as even more formidable. It will give skeptics some assurance. Some will indeed find it all by itself enough to brand Mark 16 and its parallels as probable fiction. Not only have people constructed fables about missing bodies, but the Greek and Roman legends, added together, establish that, before and after the turn of the era, a missing body was a not uncommon topos for gods and heroes in the Mediterranean world. Some of those myths, moreover, appear in the historiographical literature, where they are presented as worthy of belief. This undeniable fact merits much pondering."_ - Dale Allison, The Resurrection of Jesus Apologetics, Polemics, History p. 140 Compare Mark 16:6 "He is not here. See the place where they laid him." And Luke 24:3 but when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. To Gen. 5:24 LXX "And Enoch was well-pleasing to God, and was not found, because God translated him." Hebrews 11:5 "By faith Enoch was taken so that he did not experience death; and “he was not found, because God had taken him.” Philo Questions and Answers on Genesis 1.86 'What is the meaning of the expression, "He was not found because God translated him?" (#Ge 5:24). In the first place, the end of virtuous and holy men is not death but a translation and migration, and an approach to some other place of abode.' A search party is sent for Elijah in 2 Kings 2:16-17 but they do not find him. "And they sent fifty men, who searched for three days but did not find him." "This passage from the novel Chaereas and Callirhoe, written by the Greek author Chariton of Aphrodisias sometime in the first half of the first century ce, describes the discovery of an empty tomb and illustrates how such a discovery would be interpreted....But Chaereas does not know Callirhoe is alive, so the religious conclusions he draws from the missing body are very important. In fact, Sjef van Tilborg has recently observed that this 'is a text which prototypically determines how . . . the disappearance of a body from a grave was interpreted religiously.'...The similarities between this story and the empty tomb stories in the canonical Gospels are immediately striking: an early morning visit to the tomb, a stone moved away from the mouth of the tomb, a reaction of fear, a hesitant entry, an unsuccessful search for the body, and a reason given for its absence.... In the Gospels, the reader is led to the conclusion that God has raised Jesus from the dead-led, of course, by Jesus’ own predictions and by the interpretive help of those encountered at the tomb. In Chariton’s novel, the conclusion is “assumption,” the bodily removal of a human being (living or dead) directly into the divine realm, as (or at) the end of that person’s earthly life." - Daniel Smith, Revisiting the Empty Tomb, pg. 47-48 Since there is no verifiable independent witness of the empty tomb (all gospels follow the same basic burial sequence and discovery that derives from the Markan narrative), it's just as likely that the gospels would be employing the theme of the "miraculous missing body" as it is that they are reporting a historical fact. Thus, the story by itself is not sufficient to serve as evidence for its own historicity.

Here's an argument Mike cannot refute. The only way to verify a resurrection actually took place is by actually seeing the resurrected person. So the appearances need to be shown to have actually been empirically verified encounters with a formerly dead body that everyone could see and touch. If the nature of the appearances ends up being ambiguous, then Mike's case has failed. Paul's testimony is the earliest and only account we have written by someone who claims to have seen Jesus firsthand. He is also the only person in the entire New Testament who claims to have met Peter and James. This makes his testimony more important than anyone else's in the New Testament because if they actually inspected an empty tomb, touched the Risen Jesus or watched him physically ascend to heaven then they surely would have told Paul that! These details are conspicuous in their absence given the context of convincing the doubting Corinthians in 1 Cor 15:12-20 and would also have been helpful in explaining the type of body - v. 35. Paul only speaks of seeing/experiencing Jesus in 1 Cor 9:1, Gal. 1:16, and 1 Cor 15:8. Now the verb used in 1 Cor 15:5-8 is ophthe which was the same verb used in the Septuagint for when God "appeared" to the Patriarchs in non-physical ways - making the term ambiguous. 1 Cor 9:1 is just a form of horao but he doesn't describe what he saw and so it's ambiguous. Gal. 1:16 refers to a revelatory experience so that's ambiguous as well. So I will argue on the basis of the evidence, Paul's testimony is ambiguous and precludes any apologist from claiming it is more probable that Paul was referring to normal sensory experiences. 1. The testimony of 1 Cor 9:1, Gal. 1:16, and 1 Cor 15:5-8 is either evidence of really seeing Jesus or it isn't. 2. In order to be considered evidence of really seeing Jesus, the testimony of 1 Cor 9:1, Gal. 1:16, and 1 Cor 15:5-8 cannot be ambiguous. 3. The testimony of 1 Cor 9:1, Gal. 1:16, and 1 Cor 15:5-8 *is* ambiguous. 4. Therefore, the testimony of 1 Cor 9:1, Gal. 1:16 and 1 Cor 15:5-8 is not evidence of really seeing Jesus. Since the burden of proof is on the one claiming it is more probable these were veridical sightings of a resurrected person, but the evidence from the earliest and only firsthand testimony is ambiguous, then the case for the resurrection fails to be convincing to a neutral/objective observer. Any attempt to read in the later gospel narratives is a tacit admission that the earliest source is ambiguous/insufficient. Appealing to the gospels doesn't work anyway because once you compare the stories in chronological order, it's apparent they all exhibit signs of legendary growth. So that causes problems for historicity of the narratives.

Biggest plague and heresy in Christianity is calling Jesus divine. I've never heard such rabbit-trail hermeneutics ever, for any other Christian tenet. I've never heard such utterly demented and defamatory conclusions drawn, especially from such irresponsible and incompetent exegetics. There is no such thing as a god-man - two entirely incompatible ontologies. And no one is saved by a god-man, as God did not die in order to obey and placate Himself, and then raise Himself from the grave - utterly devilish.

1:02:23 cuz particles started at a point in time its almost like they arnt minds with wills but they are made with intent from a mind by utilizing their will

I remember when I was a young boy, and I was learning in school about how to read and write, something my teacher told me bothered me a bit when I read the Bible. I had been told that whenever quotation marks are used, what is within those quotation marks must be a verbatim record of what someone said. Then, when I looked at the Bible, I thought that there were some issues with that. For example, people quoting people who had lived a long time before them. I wondered how they could be so confident that they had all of the words exactly right. It took a long time for me to unlearn display of reading the Bible.

I wholeheartedly agree with understanding the Bible in its historical context, warts and all. However, with regard to Biblical inspiration, we run into the problem of Divine Hiddenness: Why would God use errant means to produce an inerrant message? After all, if we cannot trust the Bible authors to get small details right, we also cannot trust the bug details. In particular, there are a lot of contradictions in the story of the women at the tomb and ensuing events. The other appearances are not corroborated between gospels. This is the only information we have about the resurrection itself. I am left to conclude that whatever happened after Jesus’s death, it is not discernible from the evidence we have available. If you wish to believe Jesus resurrected, do so knowing that it is an assumption made prior to looking at any evidence.

I studied under Dr. Rota, and I will say you absolutely crushed explaining his arguments! Thanks so much for these helpful and insightful videos🙏🏼

50% chance of saving your friend will live if you were willing to believe lord ram 😅😅 so hinduism is what you should go for because you shouldnt be a bad person.. but if we are talking about the better religion in which one religion that has an faction that diddles kids or ones who kill in the name of their religion sounds like the good one because youre saving your friends life..

if you're making the universe and you're making the inhabitants, why do you need to fine tune? "gosh, i forgot the add oxygen, oh, never mind, i'll make them breath hydrogen instead" whose laws of physics is god following?

What are some good responses to the divine deceiver objection?

Leftow's summary of Swinburne's position sounds like a brazen strawman. Richard doesn't claim the Trinity is distinguished by function primarily but that by sharing in the same divine essence(particularly omniscience and ultimate goodness) the persons of the trinity invariably operate in perfect harmony, as for any of them to do otherwise would constitute a deficit in one or more of the persons. Any alternate resolution seems to imply some sort of latency or distance in their respective knowledge and will which creates real separation and is therefore no longer a trinitarian view.

THIS IS SO CRAZY!! I just said something like this on a post from CC, but I also put a comment under one of Trent Horn’s videos a while ago asking why John 3:16 became the summary of what the Gospel is. I visited Italy back in February and visited the basilicas of Paul and Francis and several other historical sites like the Museum in Florence where the statue of David is… and I saw Jesus on the cross everywhere, but I never saw any depictions of Jesus as King… and I got this weird feeling like that imagery was used to suppress people, while seeing Jesus as King actually seems to elevate people and bring hope. Wild thing.

There is no room for philosophy in Bible truth or Christianity. It just doesn't work. Open Theism is indeed a product of philosophy where you create a god based on perception.

Found you to have the same view of the bible regarding this subject as me, great content.

Hey, how about we say Jesus is divine and human, and his one will is also divine and human? One Son of God, divine and human, with one divine and human will? No two sons worry, no denial of the incarnation worry. Sounds good?

Believing stories made up by superstitious savages that didn't know where the sun went at night is self defeating.

Are these scholars preterists??

Jesus being the Messiah has to go along with an explanation of why we need a Messiah, what the Messiah does for us, or it is meaningless. God is King without the Gospel, God is King if he never came to be punished for our sins to deliver us from his wrath, King is not equal to Gospel, WRONG.

Any type of limiting Gods knowledge of all things is heresy. Proof is fulfilled prophesies in the OT. How can God know some and not all is absurd. A system to accommodate pagan libertarian freewill philosophy and decrease Sovereignty in the spectrum is heresy and human philosophy.

I reject your premise 1.

Related video: ua-cam.com/video/ftU1w5GbE4Y/v-deo.html

the idea that the evolutionary process is unguided by blind forces is funny to me. There is not explanation what so ever as to what physical systems makes our experience of reality happen Allow me to point out to the fact that from the physical physic-chemical perspective there is not experience (it is taken as a given by materialist scientists, however dined as such by materialism) So yes… it is true that we observed there is thrived for survival in nature and effort to avoid pain ( surprisingly at times, a trade of survival for the avoidance of pain ) So again… there is not a coherent let alone complete explanation by unguided evolution as to why there exists something called pain and pleasure and much less how those are synchronise with survival out comes. It seems more as if we were pleasure seeking entities rather than survival hunkers. And pleasure is used in the whole phenomenological enterprise as a tool to survive. There for… Unguided evolution, is incoherent from its core, lacks explanatory power( therefore useless ), and is none parsimonious

First you need to ask the question why is there suffering ? If its original sin then we need to be really pissed of at Adam and Eve !

Why, I wonder, didn't Jesus preach the Gospel instead of announcing the coming of the kingdom of God? He declares the forgiveness of sins long before he's put to death. That old line about the religion of Jesus being at odds with the religion about him seems truer than ever.

I have been looking for a video like this. You two did a really good job.

Well I’m relieved that everything is now clear. 😂

Too many commercials

I like this. It fits very well with a Christus Victor view of the atonement and a corporate view of election. To be saved is to be "in Christ", the eternal King who has conquered sin, death, and the devil.

LOVE THIS. Excellent content. Just got Why the Gospel a week ago

A perversion of the Gospel.

1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; [2] By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. [3] For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; [4] And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

Commenting to boost the reach of your videos!

God exists. God is omnipotent and benevolent. As forced will is tyranical and malevolent, God gave us free will to rebel against him. Evil is rebellion against Gods laws. Evil doesn't exist under naturalism, only under God.