RANT Strategies
RANT Strategies
  • 35
  • 38 050
UHF - VHF Marine Enviroment Comms
A comparison of standard length antennas tested on both VHF and UHF.
Переглядів: 319

Відео

This WILL KILL your dog
Переглядів 8216 годин тому
Emergency Medical / Pre-Veterinary Care treatemt of K9s
Battle of the Bay Part I - Stubby Antennas
Переглядів 493День тому
UHF & VHF testing of stubby antennas in the maritime enviroment
Wildland Paramedic Gear Update for 2024
Переглядів 11614 днів тому
Wildfire, Wildland, REMS, Paramedic, WildfireMedic, EMS, Paramedic, EMT,
Is this the best EDC organizer for your vehicle
Переглядів 32914 днів тому
magnetic vehicle stroage devices from @Tactote
UHF vs. VHF PART III
Переглядів 3,5 тис.21 день тому
Testing of UHF and VHF Comms in the woodland enviroment
LIVE RAFFLE June 30, 2024 @AndersonRescueSolutions @PHL_Knives @Medicineinbadplaces
Переглядів 3621 день тому
Spin the wheel drawing for prizes
Tactical Comms Part II
Переглядів 48128 днів тому
Headset based tactical communication discussion. Part 2
Tactical Comms Part I
Переглядів 599Місяць тому
Headset based tactical communication discussion.
UHF vs VHF Tactical Comms PART 2
Переглядів 7 тис.Місяць тому
Range testing analog VHF radios in comparison to UHF
UHF vs VHF Tactical Comms
Переглядів 10 тис.Місяць тому
Range testing analog VHF radios in comparison to UHF
Rope Rescue in the Tactical Enviroment
Переглядів 94Місяць тому
Rope Access / Egress / Rescue during tactical operations
Budget Comms
Переглядів 3,6 тис.Місяць тому
A discussion and demonstration of the best budgetish friendly radios we have utilized.
K-9 Emergency IO Access
Переглядів 472 місяці тому
A discussion and demonstration of K-9 IO access techniques
XPR7550 vs. XTS5000
Переглядів 1 тис.3 місяці тому
A range test of the Motorola XTS5000 vs. an XPR7550
Motorola Saber III vs. XTS5000
Переглядів 2,1 тис.4 місяці тому
Motorola Saber III vs. XTS5000
Bloat Emergencies
Переглядів 465 місяців тому
Bloat Emergencies
Reconnaissance Tactics
Переглядів 1,1 тис.6 місяців тому
Reconnaissance Tactics
K9MedOp1of24
Переглядів 486 місяців тому
K9MedOp1of24
UHF Whip vs APEX Style Antenna
Переглядів 7006 місяців тому
UHF Whip vs APEX Style Antenna
Standard vs. Stubby Antenna Range Test
Переглядів 1,8 тис.7 місяців тому
Standard vs. Stubby Antenna Range Test
TECC
Переглядів 1168 місяців тому
TECC
Suspension Syndrome
Переглядів 949 місяців тому
Suspension Syndrome
Immersion Foot
Переглядів 1269 місяців тому
Immersion Foot
BURN EMERGENCIES
Переглядів 6710 місяців тому
BURN EMERGENCIES
Heat Emergencies Part 2
Переглядів 3910 місяців тому
Heat Emergencies Part 2
Heat Emergencies Part I
Переглядів 11310 місяців тому
Heat Emergencies Part I
We got an Assignment
Переглядів 7810 місяців тому
We got an Assignment
Rope Access with RANT, ARS and CMCT Operational Development Solutions
Переглядів 133Рік тому
Rope Access with RANT, ARS and CMCT Operational Development Solutions
Austere Medical - Snake Bite Emergencies
Переглядів 83Рік тому
Austere Medical - Snake Bite Emergencies

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @VE9ASN
    @VE9ASN День тому

    Apples to apples, you get more distance from vhf per watt, just the facts.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 20 годин тому

      While I don’t disagree with you…. The results are what they are. So 🤷‍♂️

  • @seanhill68
    @seanhill68 День тому

    Great video, like to see a video on your thoughts and ideas about radio prepping for natural catastrophes

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 21 годину тому

      I will absolutely get into that! Just may take a little bit of time. Thanks for the comment

  • @baronedipiemonte3990
    @baronedipiemonte3990 День тому

    Another top test. I have used Smiley Antennas, tuned for a specific frequency e.g. an antenna tuned for VHF Hi 155mhz is good from 150-160 & a UHF antenna tuned for 465mhz is good from 460-470. They manufacture a wide variety of portable radio antennas and have interchangeable bases for just about any HT made... Motorola, Kenwood, Icom, SMA-F, SMA-M, BNC, TNC ... As I mentioned before, I don't know much about Motorolas. We had some in the 1990s Coast Guard, and they were boat anchors. We spent our own $ on VHF Marine Icoms. So I don't know if your Motorola antennas cover the entire frequency spectrum (136-174 & 400-480/520) or if they are "tuned" a bit more narrower... A little trivia... large, ocean freightliners often have UHF radios for comms within the vessel, shipboard firefighting, and for port ops in the 452/462mhz with repeater splits of 10.10, per the ITU. But a lot of them operate on GMRS without a license. It's cheaper. The FCC will send them a warning if they are caught. The UHF penetrates the bulkheads. VHF just bounces around inside the vessel. From your tests, it looks like P25 gives a clearer signal than analog in general.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies День тому

      @@baronedipiemonte3990 hey Baron, appreciate the comment! I have ZERO experience with smiley antennas but have seen a bunch of good reviews about them and would not mind comparing them to a moto antenna to see how they hold up (hello future video idea). You are also spot on about the UHF radios on ships for the crews….. I am intimately familiar with this form an enforcement perspective and everything you see are saying is accurate. I am very curious to see what happens once I push this out to the 2 mile mark. 🍻

    • @baronedipiemonte3990
      @baronedipiemonte3990 День тому

      @RANTStrategies Having seen this, and your previous tests, I'm thinking that UHF will edge out. "Theory" is fine. It's a foundation. But real world tests in a variety of environments show what works and what doesn't at the end of the day. It's good that you are testing under simplex because you aren't always going to have the convenience of repeaters - for a variety of reasons... And most of those are 10 watts or more, high gain antennas, 50 ft or higher. I saw first hand what happened to the "fancy" comms in the New Orleans areas after Hurricane Katrina. As well as areas much further north along Lakes Superior & Erie during some hard winter conditions. A lot of agencies get bit by the newest technology bugs, when often the simple solutions are the best.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 20 годин тому

      @@baronedipiemonte3990you are on the EXACT same wavelength with us for what we are going for here by doing these.

  • @jplacido9999
    @jplacido9999 2 дні тому

    In the water, CB would be the best for range , then VHF and last UHF

    • @baronedipiemonte3990
      @baronedipiemonte3990 День тому

      AM CB has characteristics just like HF and is unreliable. That's why the Coast Guard & FCC strongly discourages CB as a sole means of waterborne comms. Many of the wires you see on ocean going vessels are HF SSB dipole antennas and use "skip" to cover distance.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies День тому

      @@jplacido9999 hey j, Baron beat me to it,…… in theory you are correct, but in reality what baron is saying is accurate. This is why I’m a bit of a fanatic on gear testing, especially when it comes to comms

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 День тому

      @@RANTStrategies And you are absolutely right 👍👍👍🙏

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 День тому

      @@baronedipiemonte3990 Yes. Never as a sole radio. But even between 5W CB portables you can do 50 km over water. FM is nice to avoid QRN.

  • @Ressy66
    @Ressy66 5 днів тому

    Did a quick followup test this past day, around town handheld to handheld, as expected, UHF won out reaching about 4k's, vhf was only just breaking squelch, this was a dual test as was also recording on a mobile rig at home in dual channel scan, with mobile antenna on pole about 2 mtrs above ground, this is hilly and a lot of tree lined areas, although nothing like the density in your forest tests, at home similar results uhf was clear for about 8km's vhf disappeared around 5km's, and even close in around 2km's uhf clear vhf was noisy, so base camp in say an RV or similar height would get you good distance too on UHF, at least around here :) Then the next test, the waterfront is about 17km's from home and home is by no means on a high hill, the local car test portable was average sedan inside windscreen, vertical, facing waterfront - no obstacles, surprisingly, the VHF test from 1km was heard on the home radio albeit hissy, you could understand normal level voice, uhf nothing, car portable full quietening on both bands, headed off to a location on a local island, uhf was doa about 11ks from car, the vhf kept it all the way to the island, 19km's away on portable, home lost it between 13 and 14km's, I'm sure we could have got better distance on vhf, but there was 25 to 30 knots and it was a dark 9pm, didn't want to meet the local heli rescue guys outside the pub so stayed on the island :)

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 5 днів тому

      @@Ressy66 wow!!!! Outstanding, thank you for the info! I just completed the water testing with the standard sized antennas today… video to come shortly! Thanks again for sharing all that

  • @crackerwood661
    @crackerwood661 6 днів тому

    Enjoyed the video

  • @rmetcalf89
    @rmetcalf89 7 днів тому

    Were you facing in the direction of the receivers during all transmissions? Believe it or not, your body/melon can block RF. I know it couldn't have been much at only 1 mile, but facing the radio in the direction of the intended target can really make the slightest difference. Very similar to how holding the radio upright to where the antenna is pointed straight up at the sky can make a difference which you did very well in this video. :)

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 7 днів тому

      @@rmetcalf89 hey! Yes absolutely your melon can affect it…. I was basically 90 degrees to the receiver so there was clear line of sight without my body in the way. I was turning though to watch for traffic and to add that to the testing just because, you cannot always face your receiver so I wanted to know what they would do. And hey I appreciate you keeping me in check when it comes to the antenna orientation, but that will also be addressed and challenged later on lol.

    • @rmetcalf89
      @rmetcalf89 7 днів тому

      @@RANTStrategies I look forward to the antenna orientation test. I have done it myself and I was shocked how moving my radio 2 inches made a difference in reception for the other radios.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 7 днів тому

      @@rmetcalf89 good to know I’ll make sure thats done! Lots more to come

  • @jplacido9999
    @jplacido9999 8 днів тому

    How did you make the receiving end ? With a base station you must be shure you don't get desensitized by nearby strong signals (especially in VHF). The antenna must not be a dual band and tou have to place it at the exact same spot or there will be diferences betwen bands. You seamed to have kind of intermitent front end blocking by strong signals. On a portable receiving setup: Radio must be on a clear point (with no obstacules) . When you finish VHF, you take the portable away, and quickly put the UHF portable at the exact same spot (someone helping will do this work). That's the only way to compare (doesn't matter where you are). Otherwise, you will sabotage the end results (55 + years tac comms guru HF/VHF low/VHF mid/VHF hi/UHF/SHF here...)

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 8 днів тому

      Hey j, I definitely appreciate the comment and with your experience I certainly appreciate any insight … So on the receiving end are separate HTs with an antenna height at approx 3-4feet high. For this test they are on a beach so there are zero obstructions….. all the obstruction stuff is well tested in the woodland videos lol. This is also almost purposely not meant to be purely scientific, like doing these tests in a vacuum is of no real benefit to me, I am just looking to get the results so I know what I can expect to achieve.

  • @AlanTuringWannabe
    @AlanTuringWannabe 10 днів тому

    What is he wearing on his wrist?

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 10 днів тому

      @@AlanTuringWannabe hey, it’s a garmin foretrex 601, you’ll see it in a lot of the videos.

  • @Ressy66
    @Ressy66 10 днів тому

    These tests dont make sense, compared to my testing in the past at least, you should test every radio for output wattage on a good meter, are those all std supplied stubbies or after market? Got a VNA? I'd check them for centre frequency and compare it to the freq your using, even radio should kill it over a mile over water - just like the Sabre did (awesome radios - can't break them) and over water (and outer suburbia, mostly flat lightly hilled in one direction) VHF kills it over UHF, my tests have been over 4 kilometres (about 2.5miles IIRC) with yaesu stock stubby antenna, have a baofeng, its pretty useless, about 1km, these radios are dual band, so wont be tuned to max performance for either band. (further note 25w mobile to mobile on a highway amongst moderate hills and UHF dies after 7km, but VHF survived out to 16km) I ran the test two weeks apart to make sure I wasn't experiencing any ducting assistance, so I'm at a loss why your tests show opposite, the fact the Sabre is known for high power, is what makes me think those others are not performing where they should be) thanks for the test, we have a new dual band HH now, maybe I should redo our tests with it too. cant wait for part 2 :)

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 10 днів тому

      @@Ressy66 hey Ressy… the radios have all been tuned and tested within the last year and are all putting out right around 5watts, minus the APX… I was just looking in the CPS and realized that was set to 1 watt on all bands 🤦‍♂️. Anyway, those are all Motorola stubby antennas, and I do not have an antenna analyzer, but that would be awesome to see so thanks to your comment, one has been ordered! I certainly don’t mind testing anything and everything to make them as efficient as possible so any suggestions you have, please, share away!

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 8 днів тому

      ​@@RANTStrategies VNA won't do it, nor antenna resonance meters. Those are only to check if the antenna died or is completly out of band. Peformance will be on adapting the antenna for that radio on that frequency, and the solution for lack of counterpoise (especially in UHF), and also the quality of the antenna materials. Maxon and Motorola usally beat others makes by far....

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 8 днів тому

      @@jplacido9999 as a professional end user of many moto products, that is exactly why I have always just defaulted to using their product line. Thank you

  • @imtall31
    @imtall31 10 днів тому

    We call them "stripers" in NJ

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 10 днів тому

      @@imtall31 ha! My man (said in my best Denzel impression)

  • @423tech
    @423tech 10 днів тому

    Interesting test results. What height was the receiving radio antenna at? What frequencies did you test on? Was this on narrowband or wideband?

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 10 днів тому

      Receiving antenna height was 4 feet, freqs for VHF were 155mhz and UHF was 460mhz on narrowband

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 8 днів тому

      ​@@RANTStrategies Great unswer. Very transparent.

  • @pat9973
    @pat9973 11 днів тому

    saber 3 are you able to program? or are they astro saber?

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 11 днів тому

      Hey! I personally cannot program the sabers….. but radio tech friends of mine have the ability which is who did the ones I have

  • @Tommymad1
    @Tommymad1 11 днів тому

    Great video once again. I'm interested in how much p25 would affect audio quality and range compared to analog, especially when using OEM standard length antennas

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 11 днів тому

      @@Tommymad1 thank you! for sure, definitely going to get there….

  • @baronedipiemonte3990
    @baronedipiemonte3990 11 днів тому

    These are excellent "real world" tests. Just curious, have you bench tested the study HTs for the actual power output versus the specs ? I don’t know about the Motorolas, but I presume the VHF & UHF output wattage is the same for all ? Looking forward to your next.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 11 днів тому

      @@baronedipiemonte3990 hey! Yes I have…. The only one that was found to be different was the APX, I have to change that output, other than that all right around 5watts.

  • @ewokjerky4508
    @ewokjerky4508 11 днів тому

    Rock solid real world testing, that normal people want to see.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 11 днів тому

      @@ewokjerky4508 appreciate it! Thank you

  • @joek5352
    @joek5352 14 днів тому

    Super cool. Sell me a mounting plate and take my money.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 14 днів тому

      @@joek5352 right?!?! We thought it was an awesome idea and the owner seemed very willing to work with anyone on what they would want.

  • @offcamber782
    @offcamber782 14 днів тому

    Ok I feel like I have to chime in with this. I have been doing tests with vhf and uhf using a variety of antennas but with the same radio and at the same locations for the past few months. I have tested everything from roll up J pole antennas to an Arrow yagi antenna. My terrain is rolling east coast hills and in my case, vhf blows uhf out of the water consistently. Even comparing 2m verticals to a 7 element beam for 70cm, it’s not even close. It’s so wild to me how different everyone’s results are. I guess everyone should test to see what works for their area?

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 14 днів тому

      @@offcamber782 absolutely! If people who are into this stuff get nothing out of it except a desire to go and test their gear….. then our goal has been met!

  • @daienaa
    @daienaa 14 днів тому

    This was very good and interesting. I also have bad experience with vhf but I live in the city with a lot of buildings and obstacles so uhf have been surprisingly good here. When I did the test I took my vhf two blocks from my home (where the other radio was) and it did not work at all, I did get absolutely nothing on the recording. Uhf on the other hand did work more or less the whole city.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 14 днів тому

      @@daienaa I’m just glad you are out there putting your gear to test, strong work and thanks for sharing!

  • @baronedipiemonte3990
    @baronedipiemonte3990 18 днів тому

    I've had very good range in wooded areas with 1 watt 900 mhz simplex

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 18 днів тому

      We may actually get into that….. very cool!

  • @timbookedtwo2375
    @timbookedtwo2375 18 днів тому

    Any info on using the four or six meter amateur bands?

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 18 днів тому

      @@timbookedtwo2375 nothing on that, we may do some 10 or 20meter stuff at some point

  • @PowderMill
    @PowderMill 18 днів тому

    My Wife was deathly afraid of dogs when we were dating (early 90’s). She had been chased by dogs when she was a child. I slowly introduced her to the best animal in the world by having a friend bring over his K9, but It was still “no way, I’m too terrified”.. (then again, he shouldn’t have demonstrated “bite work” LOL After adopting an older child born with one arm, my Wife was so scared that any dog would be a threat to her remaining arm. I resigned myself we would never have a dog. Turns out my daughter ended up convincing her that all kids need a dog in order to learn love and responsibility. We ended up with a Maltee-Poo, kind of a sissy breed 😉but very smart, super sweet AND hypoallergenic. (required after I developed asthma after spending a lot of time at the WTC site - Thanks EPA director Christine Todd Witless for assuring us the air was safe to breathe). “Asbestos and mercury (liquid and vapor) are harmless, honest…. Just like GWOT was about “WMD” 🤨 Sorry.. lost my train of thought. Our tiny dog is completely attached to my Wife and she even insists it sleep in our bed. Why? “because the bed is soft and HER dog deserves to be comfortable “. 🤣 Thanks….

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 18 днів тому

      @@PowderMill that is quite the story but glad in the end a dog became part of your family. For the last 10 years I have been a professional handler and wouldn’t trade a second of it. What did you do down at WTC? When I was with the FDNY I was assigned to the 1st battalion so my house was very close to the site.

  • @PowderMill
    @PowderMill 18 днів тому

    No K-F’s ? The latest trend in 2024 Communist run USSA ? Get rid of smart, kind, obedient and cuddly dogs and go to nasty, cranky and disrespectful felines. The cat’s claws and “spray capabilities” terrify the perpetrators far more than doggies. 🤣

  • @PowderMill
    @PowderMill 18 днів тому

    Thank you for a great video and channel! I gave most of my Hytera gear away to a local volunteer fire department and really miss them for the “FPP” functionality. I still have a few XPR-7550e left to use for family emergency use. While Motorola is a beast of a radio (I still have Quantar UHF R2 repeaters up and running in a closed rack cabinet in a “not so clean environment” in a rooftop elevator mechanical room. I installed them as a favor as temp fire dept repeaters while they awaited their ordered hardware during the migration from VHF-Low Band 46.xx to UHF “T-Band”. They used 2 freq pairs licensed to their ambulance squad during the transition. They are STILL up and running perfectly (but w/my licensed IG/business band UHF freq pairs) and BpBr duplexers since 2001 ! No service (repairs) other than dusting out the cabinets every year. They made radios and repeaters that were built like tanks!

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 18 днів тому

      @@PowderMill wow way to help out the local squads! That is incredible! Glad you enjoy the content and welcome to the channel! I always say…. You can’t go wrong with a moto 😊

  • @joemarchinski914
    @joemarchinski914 19 днів тому

    I don't understand why people can't properly pronounce the name AILUNCE...(. A- LUNCE ). you and others keep pronouncing it ( A - LEE - ANCE... it's not spelled ALEEUNCE. IT IS SPELLED. AILUNCE...and when transmitting , if you put the radio mic right up to your lips it can cause mic clipping which can cause bad transmission... proper way is about 5 inches away at a slight angle, no need to over pressure the mic

  • @Austinsairplanes
    @Austinsairplanes 21 день тому

    Have you thought about testing Analogue vs digital(DMR)? I would like to see a test of range and practicality.

  • @Austinsairplanes
    @Austinsairplanes 21 день тому

    As a HAM radio operator, this is my experience. UHF is great for dense suburban areas. VHF is great for road trips in the country.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 20 днів тому

      @@Austinsairplanes yessir…. We are putting all of this to real world application and testing

  • @notthatguy4515
    @notthatguy4515 21 день тому

    Just found your channel. Great content. Have you tried this with a 1/4 wave jungle antenna at say 10’? Thank You for the content. Happy Independence Day!!

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 21 день тому

      @@notthatguy4515 hey, happy 4th!! Glad you did, welcome to the channel….. I have not, there’s going to be a gear an explanation video coming out which should clear some common questions up! Stay safe

  • @jr4062
    @jr4062 22 дні тому

    It sounded like the old saber sounded the best in uhf. It would have been nice if you did the tests with the old Motorola brick mx radios. Maybe the issues are where and what parts are used in the newer radios.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 21 день тому

      @@jr4062 I thought the same thing! Saber definitely sounded the best to me too!

  • @andrewchristiansen8311
    @andrewchristiansen8311 22 дні тому

    1000hz tone at the beginning scared my dog off.. She has bad hips. I cant stress enough how much I hate that noise. I like this topic and am shutting this off cause I dont understand why YTrs add beeps and cut tones. It's annoying to headphone users and dog owners will hate you.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 22 дні тому

      Sorry about that, watch at your own risk!

  • @SHTFchef
    @SHTFchef 22 дні тому

    You limit is the antenna. This is not a fair test. Get a 1/2 wave vhf antenna for apples to apples.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 22 дні тому

      I thought this is fair due to both antennas being 1/4 wavelength. Can you elaborate on why the VHF would have to go to 1/2 wavelength... wouldn't I then have to go to a 1/2 wavelength on the UHF side as well to make it fair?

    • @SHTFchef
      @SHTFchef 22 дні тому

      @@RANTStrategies There is a difference between the electrical length of wire in the antenna and the amount of exposed antenna. The more antenna in the air the better. A 1/2 wave 2 meter antenna would be a bit more than three feet long. For UHF a genuine half wave is only about 12 inches. In other words, in most cases, the 70cm portion of a dual band has a more "compromised" length relative to the UHF portion. This is because there is a coil being used to add electrical length but not physical length. Even with that however, my personal experience is that UHF is more dependent on pure line of sight and is more easily blocked by obstructions than VHF. Even with the same dual band antenna. Hope this helps.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 21 день тому

      @@SHTFchef I completely agree…. But being they both were utilizing a quarter wavelength antenna, shouldn’t the results have been similar or even VHF out perform UHF?

  • @justsayingforafriend7010
    @justsayingforafriend7010 22 дні тому

    VHF is great for long distance. UHF is great for in buildings in town. Because of the wavelength....

  • @la7dfa
    @la7dfa 22 дні тому

    I live on an relatively flat island with large commercial windmills in the middle. When I talk to my buddy on the other side of the island it is a significant difference between 2m and 70cm. I cant have 100% LOS to his antenna 10km awa,y since the strength is barely a few S-units. On 2m we both notice a little bit of fading due to reflections from the blades of the windmills. But on 70cm the signals via the blades are way stronger with deep nulls and high peaks of many S-units. I believe you might have the same effect in the forest, with stronger reflections from high up in the trees on 70cm. 73 de LA7DFA www.statkraft.no/globalassets/0/.com/1-about-statkraft/where-we-operate/norway/norway-smola-wind-farm_3_1500x1200.jpg

  • @revcom626
    @revcom626 23 дні тому

    Very interesting. Here in the U.K., the group I'm involved with have used VHF for years as we primarily operate in open country, albeit often with trees and uneven ground. We also have UHF handsets for closer work but don't usually try to run them over any distance. A while back, we had a slight mishap with our VHF antenna at event control part-way through and had to improvise. We stuck a UHF magnetic antenna on a steel frame camping chair and were surprised to find that on that day at least, communications showed a big improvement!

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      Very interesting!!! We are finding they to be the base more often than not

  • @LordGryllwotth
    @LordGryllwotth 23 дні тому

    Thanks for showing us. On boats they use UHF and they reach about everywhere since the wavelength is small and will pass doors and openings! But VHF does not. What would be nice is to find some scientific paper on what frequency passes easiest in the dense forest! Might be some spesific bandwidth.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      That would actually be very cool

    • @blainehartley9157
      @blainehartley9157 19 днів тому

      Pretty sure the USMC comms training manual states lower frequencies travel the farthest in every environment outside of urban or densely populated (structurally) areas…..yes uhf is awesome in these congested areas because the shorter wavelength can penetrate objects better but that blessing is also its curse…..that “high energy” so to speak does not carry well over distance….much like a dragster with 3000hp that only goes 1/4 of a mile…..the uhf signal is great within a certain distance but beyond that it runs out of steam rather quickly…..this is why the majority of long range military comms are done on HF frequencies with directional beam and/or loop type antennas….no need for repeaters…..most military air comms are in the 220-240 MHz vhf band….you would think if uhf was superior it would be used in open airspace with no obstruction but the higher wavelength keeps it from performing as well as VHF or HF……someone said in another comment marine radios are uhf and this could be true in some port areas or countries outside the US but marine radios inside the US are VHF and don’t travel very far beyond line of sight…..there are HF marine frequencies and the navy often uses HF ssb for long distance comms…..of course some of this info is dated with the current use of satellite and digital equipment and the extensive data networks available….but in a serious shtf situation you can be certain the armed forces and government will occupy any and all available space in the HF/VHF spectrum and a good portion of UHF for ground based close range comms…..the higher the frequency the less range it can provide….the science is in band usage of critical operations comms…..there is a reason rural public safety and military doesn’t move critical comms above VHF and there are always backup VHF LO or HF frequencies in their band plans

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 18 днів тому

      @@blainehartley9157 preach on 🙏! Awesome info, thank you for sharing

  • @Q12_
    @Q12_ 23 дні тому

    1 Min in and i want to say thank you for the time and effort you put into your videos in regards to actually going out into the field and putting theories into the test.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      Hey Q12! Appreciate that!! Welcome to the channel, glad you are into it!

  • @user.A9
    @user.A9 23 дні тому

    I'd like to see a comparison of VHF vs UHF handhelds used car-to-car inside a vehicle with no antenna outside the vehicle.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@user.A9 it is on the list! Just had to find a fair location terrain wise to conduct the test, but it’s coming.

    • @user.A9
      @user.A9 23 дні тому

      @@RANTStrategies please do city and rural areas.

    • @dslayer1169
      @dslayer1169 21 день тому

      I did two Baofeng UV-5G’s in an Urban environment with my wife inside the apartment and myself in a cars we got about a mile before it started to become static.

    • @user.A9
      @user.A9 21 день тому

      @@dslayer1169 did you compare VHF vs UHF?

    • @dslayer1169
      @dslayer1169 21 день тому

      @@user.A9 I did not, so I’d like to see that comparison! I’m not a licensed HAM operator only GMRS so I’m not allowed to transmit on the VHF band yet unless I use MURS, but that wouldn’t be a fair comparison given it’s only 2 watts legal maximum 😂

  • @KA9DSL
    @KA9DSL 23 дні тому

    I could have told you that, that's why the US Forest Preserve uses VHF low band. Trees absorb UHF signals easily, internal moisture content.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@KA9DSL this is true, but I question how uhf would do compared to the vhf radios issued when I’m out with the forest service…. I have had some REALLY iffy comms in places. Sometimes and especially looking at these results, I feel like UHF could out perform VHF in the forests. Especially when out on fires as there is no moisture content present, that’s why we are there lol.

    • @KA9DSL
      @KA9DSL 23 дні тому

      @@RANTStrategies It's called the shrubury effect. And yes, no moisture, no attenuation.

  • @ericm0612
    @ericm0612 23 дні тому

    So much about this is just completely wrong.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      LOL, Go on……..

    • @neillewis181
      @neillewis181 22 дні тому

      I completely agree. I am a veteran ham radio operator, and I live out in the woods. Uhf waves are bent and refracted easier than vhf. I have always been able to get out on 2m to local repeaters. I cannot hit most of the 440 repeaters. This is basic radio knowledge.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 21 день тому

      @@neillewis181 then why didn’t it punch through when uhf did? Any thoughts?

    • @423tech
      @423tech 10 днів тому

      ​@RANTStrategies You won't get any response from the basement dwellers. They are so arrogant and live exclusively via pontificating and condescending comments. "I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist and can't happen!"

  • @billmcilwee566
    @billmcilwee566 23 дні тому

    Nice test and nice video. No surprise. 70cm has a better chance of finding a path in leaves and trees. Winter might have better QSO for VHF. In Missouri, we encourage folks to get the river edge for better chance for getting a signal through. 73, KF0NNQ WRVR260.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      That is excellent advice, makes perfect sense!

  • @raymondmartin6737
    @raymondmartin6737 23 дні тому

    I have had the Ailunce HD-1 twice, the first when it came out around 2017, and now again for a couple of years. It is pretty good, and for DMR, which I started with in 2016, with then very few other than UHF with a Commercial Hytera model for about $400.00 or more. I have other DMR capable radios now, with the Chinese being more recent as DMR was a European ETSI system I completed a correspondence course from Tait systems in 2018. This was a more commercially directed course as opposed to amateur radio. 73 de Ray W2CH New Hampshire. Licensed since 1962, and age 80 now. 😊

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@raymondmartin6737 wow! 80 years old and a ham since 1962! You have probably forgotten more about radio then I’ll ever know. Awesome to have you as part of the channel. So the HD1 that’s in the video is the original from 2017 but it is the gps version. Glad you are enjoying the content and please any insight you have, feel free to provide it, it’s welcomed here. 73!

    • @raymondmartin6737
      @raymondmartin6737 23 дні тому

      @RANTStrategies Thanks 😊 Very much. Yes both, the first one and my current HD-1 were and are the GPS version, which I do believe we're $10.00 more expensive than the non-GPS version. There is now an HD-2 version, but I saw it's not very different from the original HD-1. 73 de Ray W2CH, NH.

  • @jplacido9999
    @jplacido9999 24 дні тому

    In fact, VHF low band (30-50 MHz) will outperform all UHF radios. Of course you must use a good antenna with counterpoise. That is better for military and Red Cross style operations...(In the field)

    • @LukePRTR
      @LukePRTR 23 дні тому

      Using these freqs also for ECCM modes. No issues

    • @MrFreddarama
      @MrFreddarama 23 дні тому

      We have low band 25 mhz for all of our communication vans and they work the best for out in the deep forests and rural foothills. All vehicles have optimized and highly efficient 60 inch antennas with good ground planes. They definitely outperform our UHF radio but we love UHF for repeater service and out in the city.

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 23 дні тому

      @@MrFreddarama 25 MHz is HF (altough similar to VHF low band in propagation, but better) Are you shure it is 25 MHz ? It is great in the woods... With 50W version (you can up to 1500W SSB or 500W FM) you get a lot of km between mobile units with good, centered antennas (side mounted are a problem for 360º range). Can you give more details ? 25 MHz is great....👍 UHF is pratical for portables (you can link the UHF portable to the 25 MHz in the car, via simplex)

    • @timbookedtwo2375
      @timbookedtwo2375 18 днів тому

      @@jplacido9999 25MHz is not an amateur radio band. It is above the 12meter amateur band and below the 11 meter CB band and 10 meter amateur band. It is HF and not VHF. Would not a CB radio with appropriate antenna work as well?

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 18 днів тому

      @@timbookedtwo2375 Yes I know. I have near 60 years of radiocomms (SWL, CB, HAM, MIL, POL, Red Cross, Fireman, Civil Defense, etc.) I was comment on the guy refering his 25 MHz network, telling him that 25 MHz is HF (not VHF as he stated) and he can be right, because there is some 25 MHz simplex comms licences.... CB will have the same range but much more QRM....

  • @jeffkardosjr.3825
    @jeffkardosjr.3825 24 дні тому

    Nice thing about 70cm is a half wave antenna is quite portable.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@jeffkardosjr.3825 absolutely! It was just a little surprising to see that with both bands having 1/4 wavelength that 2meters couldn’t get out at all.

  • @hardwired3640
    @hardwired3640 24 дні тому

    1/4 wavelength is half of the antenna. You actually need a 1/2 wavelength antenna to have a true dipole. In practicality you have 1/4 wavelength antenna whip and the metal inside the radio + capacitive coupling between your hand and the radio are acting like the other half of the antenna. To state it a different way that might help some people… half of your antenna is the antenna whip and your skin and the body of the radio are the other half. Human skin isn’t very conductive obviously. On uhf it’s manageable to get a 1/2 wavelength antenna whip, but on vhf it’s just too large to be very practical. Better to keep uhf on your person and vhf for longer distance vehicle mounted communication. You can also do something cool like crossband repeat through an IC-2730a on your vehicle. This radio will pass p25 and fusion c4fm in the crossband repeat mode even though the radio is only an analog radio. It’s an undocumented feature.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@hardwired3640 💯 % we are actually going to get into this a little on an antenna test video we are going to put out, great info! Also, love the trick with that radio! We all run xts5550s in our trucks.

  • @xitec75
    @xitec75 24 дні тому

    As lower the frequency as better is the range. On the 70cm/2m band (only one I can use) I prefer 100+cm foldable tactical ABBREE antennas. If someone wants maximum range I recommend CB radios if you have no HAM license. Another thing to know: If your partner does not hear you, that does not mean that a receiving tower does not hear you. They are so powerful that they get signals more than 100km away even if your partner is less than 2km distance and cannot hear you. Another interesting thing: Some frequencies are being reflected by the enviroment similar to a flashlight against a mirror, others can go throught an obstacle and some frequencies cannot. It's a miracle if you test it in the real world.

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 23 дні тому

      @@xitec75 while there is usually some truth to this, the focus here is on no infrastructure and short range “squad style” needs for communication.

  • @tangle70
    @tangle70 24 дні тому

    Love real world tests. Looking forward to the water test.

  • @johnpush4585
    @johnpush4585 24 дні тому

    As an actual Comms Guru for a major PD, I agree with UHF being a better band period! I've talked clear across down town Boston on simplex with portable radios. Mobile radios don't even need a repeater if everyone is in the city. I've also found that UHF is almost always better in the woods. Never walked out of range of UHF. I have with VHF. Excellent channel!!

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 24 дні тому

      Hey John, definitely appreciate the channel and your feedback. It's always interesting to us to put these things to the test and see where the results wind up. Glad you enjoy and appreciate it like we do!

    • @jeffkardosjr.3825
      @jeffkardosjr.3825 24 дні тому

      I wonder if 6 meters is better than 2 meters for the woods.

    • @jplacido9999
      @jplacido9999 24 дні тому

      ​@@jeffkardosjr.3825 Yes it is, but be carefull with the antenna...

    • @LordGryllwotth
      @LordGryllwotth 23 дні тому

      ​@@jeffkardosjr.3825I am thinking the wavelength needs to be smaller than what the forest is dense. But it might be like UHF goes nice and low VHF goes nice. But not in the between. I want to search for a paper about it

  • @gdavis316
    @gdavis316 25 днів тому

    Oh, I forgot the syntor X9000 low band.......and, and. I freaking need 1:21 moto intervention😮

  • @gdavis316
    @gdavis316 25 днів тому

    Hey, Like your radio videos. Tell me, why do you like radio equipment? And do you like patches. L E retired/XTS300-5000, astro saber, saber, ht1000, astro spectra, mocom70, XPR all series, 2 repeaters......(whew, don't tell the wife)owner

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 25 днів тому

      Good afternoon! Welcome to the channel, every member of RANT is a LEO/paramedic/ with at least one additional professional specialty. I feel and we have witnessed that in current times we are so reliant on cell phones and the internet, that are built on such frail infrastructures. Having a reliable alternative is necessary. Once the decision is made to have an alternative (radio being the case here) it’s not enough to just have it. Understanding it, practicing with it and knowing its capabilities is a necessity. In addition to that, it’s just awesome what radios can do once you start exploring, I was instantly hooked and have more then I would ever admit to my wife as well… it’s an addiction lol. Stay safe!

    • @gdavis316
      @gdavis316 25 днів тому

      I thought that was why. You have changed some of my thinking with your test. Thanks, keep them coming! Stay safe, and everyone else.....you better get you comms up and running!

    • @RANTStrategies
      @RANTStrategies 25 днів тому

      @@gdavis316 we have another one that’s going to be released next week and then a bunch more on the schedule! Glad you are enjoying! I definitely like making them

  • @billmcilwee566
    @billmcilwee566 28 днів тому

    Detailed. Thanks for your video. 73, KF0NNQ and WRVR260.