Max Jet Review
Max Jet Review
  • 19
  • 195 250
My Favorite - Eclipse 500 Review | Avio v. 2.9.6
What sets the Eclipse 550 apart from the Eclipse 500? Let's explore the details. We will concentrate on the technical specifications of the Eclipse 500 personal jet with Avio 2.9.6 avionics, autothrottle, synthetic vision, and ABS.
This aircraft was purposefully designed with pilots in mind, and this attention to detail is evident in every aspect. Unlike many other aircraft, it avoids the use of numerous relays and mechanical fuses commonly found in aviation. Instead, all systems are fully automated, electronic, and under computer control, making them exceptionally reliable in practice.
And don't let the sizes fool you. The Eclipse 500 is a light jet that can fly at an altitude of 41,000 feet and has a maximum cruise speed of 370 knots true airspeed. At FL410, the Eclipse 500 uses 52 gallons of fuel per hour.
Eclipse is renowned for its fuel efficiency and low operating costs, comparable to piston-engine aircraft, making it a highly appealing choice for business and private aviation. Eclipse is a personal jet meticulously crafted with the pilot's needs at the forefront. The aircraft boasts modern avionics, a glass cockpit, and integrated navigation and control systems. Additionally, our aircraft includes throttle automation, simplifying the piloting experience.
Eclipse represents a fresh perspective on light aviation, focusing on cutting-edge technology and passenger comfort. This makes it a top pick for individuals in search of an innovative and dependable aircraft in this category.
E-mail - mg@dajets.com
Website - www.dajets.com
Facebook - max.golyi
Instagram - dajetpilot
#EclipseJet #review #businessaviation
00:00 - Intro
00:20 - History
00:41 - Exterior overview, pre-flight check
03:25 - Interior overview
04:19 - Cockpit overview
08:21 - Engines start
09:46 - Taxi
11:04 - Takeoff
12:48 - Eclipse Jet vs Cirrus Vision Jet
13:24 - Feelings Eclipse Jet gives
13:52 - Stall 1 - Autothrottle
14:36 - Stall 2 - Stick pusher
15:12 - Automatic approach
16:06 - My only complaint
18:21 - Landing
19:34 - Outro
Переглядів: 12 972

Відео

Review of the Hawker: Is That Plane Still Up to Date?
Переглядів 8 тис.7 місяців тому
First of all, I would like to note that this issue is relevant for the following models: Hawker 800 - Final variant of the BAe 125 800 series. Produced under the "Corporate Aircraft" moniker before being replaced by the Hawker 800XP. Hawker 800XP - variant with TFE731-5BR1H turbofan engines with 4,660 lbf (20.7 kN) of thrust each Hawker 800SP and 800XP2 - The designation for Hawker 800 and Hawk...
Citation Mustang CE-510 review | How to pass jet type rating check ride
Переглядів 15 тис.Рік тому
Citation Mustang CE-510 Jet review. How to pass jet type rating check ride Cessna Citation CE-510 Mustang is the first certified very light jet. Back in the 2000’s Diamond and Piper also had their own VLJ projects, which never materialized. You will see how jet pilots take their check rides for jet type ratings and for recurrent checks required by FAR 61.58. In this video you will see me workin...
Phenom 100 Jet Pilot Mentoring | Part 2 Upset recovery
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
Phenom 100 jet pilot Mentoring. Part 2. Upset recovery. It is a common perceptions that you need thousands of hours of flight experience to fly a jet. However, there are faster ways to become a better pilot. Learning is defined as change of behavior as as result of experience. Skill is a result of training, of being in different situations. If you accumulate hours by flying in familiar environm...
Phenom 100 jet pilot Mentoring | Part 1 Busy Airspace
Переглядів 19 тис.Рік тому
Phenom 100 jet pilot Mentoring. Part 1. Busy airspace. It is a common perceptions that you need thousands of hours of flight experience to fly a jet. However, there are faster ways to become a better pilot. Learning is defined as change of behavior as as result of experience. Skill is a result of training, of being in different situations. If you accumulate hours by flying in familiar environme...
Beechcraft Premier | The fastest business JET
Переглядів 79 тис.Рік тому
Beechcraft Premier | The fastest business JET
Cessna Citation C525 CJ Jet Review with Garmin Avionics
Переглядів 18 тис.Рік тому
Cessna Citation C525 CJ Jet Review with Garmin Avionics

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @georgewiel
    @georgewiel 8 годин тому

    Thanks for sharing this, Max. Very informative! Would love to see the whole oral portion of the type rating exam in preparation for mine.

  • @ZazaBoeing747
    @ZazaBoeing747 5 днів тому

    I’m glad to see Borat enjoying this plane so much!

  • @nonactive3654
    @nonactive3654 9 днів тому

    I bought 3 the other day.

  • @VitoV9600
    @VitoV9600 14 днів тому

    Awesome Bird ...no legs

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 11 днів тому

      Thanks. Do you fly?

  • @krdmnomer
    @krdmnomer 16 днів тому

    What is the top competitor of this model?

  • @Youngsheldon222
    @Youngsheldon222 17 днів тому

    Why do you look like a beggar 😂😂😂

  • @slantedperspective
    @slantedperspective 18 днів тому

    Full length ?

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 16 днів тому

      Yes. RW behind you is useless 😉

  • @joerajacic1608
    @joerajacic1608 25 днів тому

    Great video Max. I want to get a type in this airplane - do you do training? Also, where did you get your upset training to meet the requirement for the Eclipse rating?

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 22 дні тому

      I do training in the Eclipse. Please feel free to contact me +1-917-951-8504. I got mine done at X58 with the guy, who since retired. Do you already have an Eclipse?

  • @ronmiller171
    @ronmiller171 Місяць тому

    Chase Elliott owns ones of these jets

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 28 днів тому

      One of CJ's? Does he fly himself?

  • @gkpgeo
    @gkpgeo Місяць тому

    I saw a cesna flying at 42000 ft in flightradar24 .... is it possible

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 28 днів тому

      CJ2 and bigger are certified up to FL450. So possibly if they got a block they could be at 42000.

  • @okonannaji6806
    @okonannaji6806 Місяць тому

    Again you impress me. Great video. You make it seem all so simple and great. I would want your help with getting into flying.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 28 днів тому

      Thanks for your feedback. Let me know what I can help you with.

  • @saurabhtiwari2247
    @saurabhtiwari2247 Місяць тому

    I don't have parking for thisz otherwise I would have bought one of them

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      We can find you a parking spot 😉

  • @okonannaji6806
    @okonannaji6806 Місяць тому

    I love how you make it sound so easy and layman understandable. I love your content. Keep doing more of it. Ikem from Nigeria

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      Thank you! I appreciate your feedback. Do you fly?

    • @okonannaji6806
      @okonannaji6806 Місяць тому

      @@MaxJetRev Thank you. No I don't but I hope to someday.

  • @stresswes
    @stresswes Місяць тому

    Max, great video. Is there Premier still experiencing parts supply issues? Also, is the Collins avionics a significant disadvantage to Garmin or Eclipse panel?

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      I mostly find used (serviceable / as removed / overhauled) parts for Premier to keep the cost under control. I hadn't had any issues with parts supply used or new. Collins PL21 sucks! It's old school design, without the mid for user experience or user interface. If something brakes, replacements are 2X to 10X the price of comparable Garmin or IS&S (Eclipse) unit.

  • @evanrussell7806
    @evanrussell7806 Місяць тому

    Я бы хотел полететь с тобой, и попрактиковаться в русском языке.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      С удовольствием. На чём Вы летаете?

  • @obstinatejack
    @obstinatejack Місяць тому

    bro you really need to work on your english, you are just so hard to listen to

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      Everyone has their flaws 😂

  • @BirdDog.
    @BirdDog. 2 місяці тому

    Yikes, is he really flying that e100 single pilot? i would hate to see him handle single pilot IFR. This looks like a NTSB investigation waiting to happen. He needs 200 hours minimum with a copilot.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      Currently he's flying SP, including several transatlantic trips. In this video he was still learning. His strength is ability to admit that he needs training and ability to learn.

  • @RA-II
    @RA-II 2 місяці тому

    Nice bird , but I like my GulfStream

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      That's like comparing apples and oranges 😂 What kind of G do you have?

    • @rdawgz866
      @rdawgz866 24 дні тому

      Beyond obnoxious to come make. Comparing a 3.5 million dollar plane to a 20 to 80 million dollar plane!

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 22 дні тому

      @@rdawgz866 it all depends on the mission. I'm sure the Gulfstream is not as good with short runways 😉 I've been to airports with runways under 3000 ft in the Eclipse.

  • @v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31
    @v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31 2 місяці тому

    The eclipse has fans,,, however would ultimately like the EA 700,, extended version of the 550..

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      Unfortunately I don't think it will ever come to life. It needs to much re-certification work (cost) and relatively small market.

  • @williamsimmons8028
    @williamsimmons8028 2 місяці тому

    Max, how many hours flight time to be type rated in Hawker jet for Pic?

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      There are no minimum hour requirements to be typed as a PIC. You may have a type rating as a private pilot. It all depends on the quality of your previous experience. What do you currently fly?

    • @williamsimmons8028
      @williamsimmons8028 Місяць тому

      @@MaxJetRev Max thanks for your reply and I currently fly 172 but, I'm looking to get into a Piaggio and Hawker 1000 for the business this year.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      @@williamsimmons8028 ouch. Both of those are maintenance nightmares 🙈

  • @phillipcraft-uf2ox
    @phillipcraft-uf2ox 2 місяці тому

    Love your video and all your replies How do you get certified for the eclipse after getting ppl in a single engine What would be next steps to get certified for eclipse as your private plane

  • @phillipcraft-uf2ox
    @phillipcraft-uf2ox 2 місяці тому

    Love your video and all your replies How do you get certified for the eclipse after getting ppl in a single engine What would be next steps to get certified for eclipse as your private plane

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      You need to get an Instrument Rating, then you may start working on your type rating. What do you currently fly?

  • @Glofilter
    @Glofilter 3 місяці тому

    Best eclipse jet video I've seen- even better than the ones made by folks trying to sell you one. I like that you pointed out the only advantage Cirrus has is their marketing team. Why anyone would want an underpowered single engine jet baffles me.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      Marketing works… People buy jets based on emotion vs common cense. Anyone familiar with jet basics would understand that jets reach efficiency at high 30’s and 40’s. SF-50 has turboprop performance.

    • @Glofilter
      @Glofilter 3 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev I would argue that SF-50 is lagging to turboprop performance. I'd rather have a TBM or Pilatus for 50 reasons than a Cirrus jet. I guess that is why there are so many Cirrus jets for sale....

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      @@Glofilter people buy Cirrus Jet as a toy, fly it and realize what it worth... Same with HJ. It's nice, but....

  • @iflyu2
    @iflyu2 3 місяці тому

    You don’t necessarily take off unpressurized. Only on the 800A and before are you required to shut off the apu before takeoff and start it after you land. On the 800XP and up, the Honeywell APU can be left running up to 30,000 feet and started below 20,000 providing bleed air to the pressurization system. The only limitation is the engine bleeds and the apu bleed air can’t be on together for more than a one minute.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      That’s a good remark. I meant you can’t use engines bleed for pressurization during take off, even if engine anti ice is off. Which to me seems strange.

  • @clifbradley
    @clifbradley 3 місяці тому

    Russian Archer missiles were copies of American first generation AiM-9 Sidewinders and lacked the liquid cooling of the thermal seeking head and Russia used a proximity fuse to explode by driving an explosive pin into a liquid that caused an explosion. Unfortunately, the missiles usually hit directly before exploding or exploding a second after a hit because the explosive compound had become hardened. Not saying the jet isn't tough, but the Russian missiles also sucked.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      Agreed. Russian military build and design quality has always been on a very low level.

  • @karakurukedi
    @karakurukedi 3 місяці тому

    Thank you bro, very good explanation.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      Thank you. Do you fly?

  • @DonAv8s
    @DonAv8s 4 місяці тому

    Great job selling Eclipse Jet! Nice video.

  • @MrTp057
    @MrTp057 4 місяці тому

    Enjoyed this video a lot. But your headset microphone when transmitting sounded terrible! Thought it worth passing along.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      Thanks for your feedback. Do you fly?

    • @MrTp057
      @MrTp057 4 місяці тому

      I have my ppl but haven't flown in years. I worked at Eclipse for 10 years. I was lead designer on doors, windows, nose and cockpit among others.@@MaxJetRev

  • @audioenergy
    @audioenergy 4 місяці тому

    How much are the operating costs per hour, when i fly 100 h per year?

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      All inclusive (fixed & variable) is around $1100 / h. But as you probably know, it will depend heavily on where and how you do the maintenance. If you go to the big name shops they will bill the hell out of you without the added safety or quality benefit.

    • @audioenergy
      @audioenergy 4 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev thank you so much 😊👍

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      @@audioenergy you are welcome. What do you currently fly?

    • @audioenergy
      @audioenergy 4 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev I'm not flying at all at the moment. I will start the PPL training this year. But I need a small jet or a TBM/ Meridian for my business.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      @@audioenergy I would definitely go for a jet. Another level of comfort and safety at more or less the same operating expenses. Let me know if you need help finding the right plane, finding / training the right pilot and setting up our operations the way it doesn't break your bank +1(917)951-8504

  • @JimBronson
    @JimBronson 4 місяці тому

    "with max fuel useful load is 800 lbs, you can carry 4 people" Maybe 4 Europeans. Ain't no way you're carrying 4 American big bubbas with 800 lbs. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      It’s a little less than 800 lbs. Let’s say two have to be ladies 😉 What do you fly?

    • @JimBronson
      @JimBronson 4 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev Don't fly anything, looking to start learning, but when I start looking at the useful load of many GA airplanes along with turboprops and even light jets it's kind of a head scratcher for usefulness as to what I'd actually do with a PPL. I'd like to be able to fly cross country from Central Texas to the West coast with maximum one stop, with minimum 3 people and some baggage. But when I look at the payload range of many GA aircraft it's hard to make it make sense. It doesn't appear some of the lower end jets and turboprops are much better. I'm 6'7"/2m01 and I've never weighed under 230 in the last 20 years and I'm more than that now. Which is an additional segue in that I need something that my knees are not jammed against the dash, but that's another discussion. I really like the sidesticks like on the Eclipse but it is not common in GA aircraft except for Cirrus.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      @@JimBronson if you want to learn to fly yourself, Cirrus SR22 is the way to go. You will enjoy flying it to learn and 1 stop trips to West Coast with 2-3 people on board are doable. Eclipse can carry 4 people TX to West Coast no problem.

  • @notheworldisnotendin
    @notheworldisnotendin 4 місяці тому

    Hey Max! Just came across your channel and loved this video on the Eclipse. I have a friend/client who is wanting to move from a turbo commander to an Eclipse. Would love to have a conversation with you about any 550’s that you know are available, or will be coming available soon. We are based out of KLXT but can access KMKC very easily. Safe travels my friend!

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      550 is 500 made in 2013-2017. No other significant differences. You really need to understand Eclipse versions before buying it. I can help. Feel free to contact me +1(917)951-8504. iMessage or WhatsApp works best.

  • @kurakuson
    @kurakuson 4 місяці тому

    Not a lot of cockpit legroom/space for a 6'4" dude.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      Yes. The cockpit is really tight. Eclipse has more space.

  • @JimBronson
    @JimBronson 4 місяці тому

    What would be the seat pitch for a 6 seat configuraton? Still pretty comfortable? I suppose carrying 6 humans would cut into your range quite a bit one of these.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      It’s not. In my opinion is too crammed. You would have to crawl to every seat other than 2L. Five is doable.

  • @realulli
    @realulli 4 місяці тому

    No checklist on the glass cockpit... surprising, considering the high level of integration.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      It has a check list on MFD. It’s not convenient though. Does not have a designated scroll wheel. What do you fly?

    • @realulli
      @realulli 4 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev My chair. I'm just an interested amateur, watching various aviation channels, dreaming of getting a license some time. Unfortunately, flying is *very* expensive here in Germany, as in, "with my disposable income I can afford 2 hours of flying per month". I've just been watching premier1driver a lot and I think his digital checklist is rather efficient, checking the items with a button on the yoke. I have to admit, I've been writing checklists for my work (in IT) and they're more convenient on paper. Most of them got automated away, though. If I can make a checklist, it can frequently be automated and the computer is even better at following checklists than a human... ;-)

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 4 місяці тому

    It's also my favorite because of the fuel economy, better than a Baron 58 but it could still be much better still. And Eclipse should make their own engines because greedy pratt and whitney charge a million for each engine which ruins their business. The engines are not that complicated. Eclipse was started before Cirrus made the SR planes but that's a minor point. On a side note, can you admit that israel is evil?

  • @yurimoros
    @yurimoros 4 місяці тому

    Do you teach to get rating in the eclipse ??? Woow I own one but I need to get my rating

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      I do. Please feel free to contact me +1(917)951-8504

  • @yurimoros
    @yurimoros 4 місяці тому

    Something amazing was missing… is in your approach electronic chart where you can see the plane flying profile in the chart pushing in the line select left keys number two … I don’t know why did not have you that option in fly … YOUR AMAZING VIDEO … you are sooo right Is the favorite one as a personal better easy that turbo pro propeller even little big jet get complicate because are not 150% real single pilot

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      Eclipse concept is very well thought out with modern user experience concepts. A lot other manufacturers forget that easy to fly planes are safe and instead use off the shelf solutions from older planes with 50’s tech. Hopefully the new Eclipse owners will be able to restart production and make some cool upgrades to the plane.

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 5 місяців тому

    Single pilot perspective jet that’s amazing and after watching this Max I love it

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      Thanks. What do you currently fly?

  • @unpilot1
    @unpilot1 5 місяців тому

    Very nice video and clear and concise information. I would love to have one of these. Maybe when the market improves a little.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      It’s a great plane. What do currently fly?

    • @unpilot1
      @unpilot1 5 місяців тому

      Nothing....retired from the airlines in 2020. Would love my own plane and the Eclipse is at the top of the list.@@MaxJetRev

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      @@unpilot1 if you are an experienced pilot version 1.9 is all you need. You can find one for well under $1m

    • @unpilot1
      @unpilot1 4 місяці тому

      I love having AT and Anti lock brakes!@@MaxJetRev

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 4 місяці тому

      @@unpilot1 anti throttles are cool. Antilock brakes are not that big of a deal in the Eclipse since it touches down at a speed of around 80 knots. Unless you go really crazy on the brakes it’s hard to skid.

  • @carlos23161
    @carlos23161 5 місяців тому

    Hello, Former Hawker captain here. About 3,000 hours in type. I’m flying 777’s now. All jets require maintenance. The Hawker is the most rugged, overbuilt aircraft I’ve flown. I does many things very well. Even it’s electrical system is superior to Bombardier products because, when you accidentally leave a hot item on, like a hell hole light, only one battery is drained, instead of two. This allows you to charge the dead battery with external power instead of having to pull out both batteries to recharge them. It’s mechanical nose gear down indication is wonderful to have too when your nose gear down light is inoperative when gear is selected down on the downwind. Too many other good things to list.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      It sure was good for its time, but I think by now it is a little outdated. I love the way it flys (very responsive), but operating it is the whole different story.

    • @carlos23161
      @carlos23161 3 місяці тому

      Yes, it is indeed outdated. There is a huge acquisition saving cost as a result. Speaking of outdated, bags still have to be carried up the stairs & loaded in the cabin unless an aftermarket baggage attachment is purchased.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      @@carlos23161 the point is they are cheap to buy, but expensive and cumbersome to maintain.

    • @Tomatnaufmaugn
      @Tomatnaufmaugn 2 місяці тому

      @@MaxJetRev And the reason they're expensive and cumbersome to maintain is parts availability for the most part. Cockpit windscreens for hawkers have tripled in price and lead time over the last few years for example and if you want to get anything for an 800xp with the old honeywell avionics... good luck.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev Місяць тому

      @@Tomatnaufmaugn my mechanics also complain about bad manuals etc.

  • @n1454aj
    @n1454aj 5 місяців тому

    Super review. I have flown a 550 for 6 years and 1,000 hours. It has been a tremendous personal aircraft. I have had 2 AOG episodes. The part situation has improved substantially. To upgrade in capabilities I would have to double my costs of both capitol and operating expenses.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      Thanks for sharing your experience! That's much better AOG statistics than in a lot of comparable airplanes. Out of my experience I get most of AOG's in Premiers.

    • @stresswes
      @stresswes 3 місяці тому

      Question, have you had any mechanical or parts supply issues with the Eclipse? I am in the market to purchase one in the near future.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      @@stresswes now there are no issues. In fact Eclipse has very good support. There were issues years ago, but you can always find parts if you look hard enough 😉

    • @joerajacic1608
      @joerajacic1608 12 днів тому

      @@stresswes Where are you located? Maybe we can look together for a plane. I am in Reno, NV

  • @gordonf8208
    @gordonf8208 5 місяців тому

    Nice video, Max! I have owned and flown an Eclipse jet for over 11 years. It's the same configuration as the one in your video. You absolutely nailed it when you stated that you have a grin on your face every time you fly it. I've been flying for 50 years and have flown many types, but, like you, this is my favorite. I pinch myself every time I fly it and never forget how fortunate I am to be able to do so. It's the perfect personal jet.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      It seems like every pilot who flew the Eclipse loves it! But there are a lot of people out there who only heard stories about Eclipse and spread a lot of negative myths about it.

    • @stresswes
      @stresswes 3 місяці тому

      Question, have you had any mechanical or parts supply issues with the Eclipse? I am in the market to purchase one in the near future.

    • @gordonf8208
      @gordonf8208 3 місяці тому

      No, @stresswes, I have never been AOG due to lack of parts in the 12 years I have had the airplane. The new owner has done a great job getting vendor relationships back on track.

    • @stresswes
      @stresswes 3 місяці тому

      ​@@gordonf8208thanks for the reply.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 3 місяці тому

      @@stresswes there are no issues with Eclipse parts.

  • @Mets747
    @Mets747 5 місяців тому

    Just came across your channel, been really enjoying the videos! Great info and great video production, looking forward to more!

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      Thanks for your feedback. What other planes would you like to see on our channel?

    • @Mets747
      @Mets747 5 місяців тому

      @@MaxJetRev whatever else you are typed in!

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@Mets747do you fly 747's?

    • @Mets747
      @Mets747 5 місяців тому

      @@MaxJetRev unfortunately no lol. PPL ASEL atm. Working on instrument

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@Mets747 that's a good start. Where do you fly out of?

  • @julianwelz4450
    @julianwelz4450 5 місяців тому

    Flying only as a Simpilot with X-plane 11.55 and the Aerobask Eclipse 550 NG. Great little jet and my favorite when I whant to fly little aircrafts.😊 Thanks for your video. Cause of depencies xplane and Garmin 1000 the Systems in the aerobask Eclipse are more Garmin-like as in the original Eclipse, but therefore not to far away.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      Original Eclipse had Avydine, then switched to IS&S. Versions 1.0-1.7 had GNS400 for navigation, but it was connected to Avydine or IS&S.

  • @michaelmcconnell3777
    @michaelmcconnell3777 5 місяців тому

    Vern NEVER owned a Cirrus. He owned a Constellation, a B-25 and a Beech Duke. He flew Paul Allen's Cessna CJ1 for Vulcan Investments which introduced him to the advantages and efficencies of light jet travel.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      That’s interesting. I have heard the Cirrus story many times.

    • @gordonf8208
      @gordonf8208 5 місяців тому

      During the Eclipse development years, he flew a Turbo Commander.

    • @michaelmcconnell3777
      @michaelmcconnell3777 5 місяців тому

      @@gordonf8208 i WAS IN IT MANY, MANY, MANY TIMES.

  • @jacobskelton6256
    @jacobskelton6256 5 місяців тому

    Yeah, I built this airplane...

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      In Wichita?

    • @jacobskelton6256
      @jacobskelton6256 5 місяців тому

      No, in Independence, KS. The Mustang and Mustang M2, were made at KIDP.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@jacobskelton6256that's where Cessna pistons are made if I'm correct?

    • @jacobskelton6256
      @jacobskelton6256 5 місяців тому

      @MaxJetRev you are correct. However, as I'm sure you are aware, Mustang production was stopped a several years ago.

  • @Helicopterpilot16
    @Helicopterpilot16 5 місяців тому

    Seems like you departed from KFXE. Worked at a really shotty FBO there back in 2015. We had an eclipse stop in and it was my first time seeing one up close. Really cool machine and the cockpit is perfection!

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      The North East coroner FBO? 😅

    • @Helicopterpilot16
      @Helicopterpilot16 5 місяців тому

      @@MaxJetRev Worse, South East. Back in 2015 it was known as Sano Jet Center (vomit). Tried getting a job at Banyan to no avail. Had interviews for Atlantic in both Boca and Palm that were no go's.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@Helicopterpilot16 I remember this one. Now it's Executive Jet. They are trying, doing little improvements here and there. In the past couple of years so much airport real estate was developed, that it seems like runways are at capacity. Two brand new FBO's in OPF and the olds once are building hangars.

  • @Kaipeternicolas
    @Kaipeternicolas 5 місяців тому

    I remember sitting in one of these in Oshkosh 2005 I believe. Great to see that there still is a more up to date version of it available. Great alternative to a C510 Mustang.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      I would pick Eclipse over Mustabg any day. By the way I do have a video about Mustabg on my Channel ua-cam.com/video/7nsApPUJBaE/v-deo.htmlsi=_-kJ_HXTPoFZ8g_E

  • @danarami6378
    @danarami6378 5 місяців тому

    Trust vectoring behind the engine, if I may? Thank you

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      That’s a wild guess. Unfortunately CJ is not a fighter. Although it does vector thrust out 😉 What do you think it is used for?

    • @danarami6378
      @danarami6378 5 місяців тому

      My bad, what I meant was to slow it down

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@danarami6378 that’s correct. Thrust attenuators block forward thrust which in turn helps the pane slow down, because early FJ44 engines had relatively high idle thrust.

    • @danarami6378
      @danarami6378 5 місяців тому

      another words, poor man's trust reversers on my next trip to NYC I'd contact you, perhaps for a short time if you're available and not flying? Thank you Max,

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@danarami6378 I’m not in NYC 😅

  • @danarami6378
    @danarami6378 5 місяців тому

    Hi Max, great what is the range of this eclipse if you don't mind? Thank you

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      It’s 1050 nm.

    • @aaronmuller5891
      @aaronmuller5891 5 місяців тому

      ​@@MaxJetRev range with 4 adults?

    • @aaronmuller5891
      @aaronmuller5891 5 місяців тому

      Getting private in a da-42 and would like to maybe move here next

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@aaronmuller5891 you can do four normal size adults and full tanks. Remember this airplane is approved with 6 total seats. In the video 2 middle raw seats are out.

    • @MaxJetRev
      @MaxJetRev 5 місяців тому

      @@aaronmuller5891nice basic training machine, but Cirrus is a bit better if you'd like to transition to Eclipse or such. Cirrus gets you use to higher speeds.