- 99
- 457 813
Holloway NDT & Engineering Inc.
Приєднався 9 кві 2015
Two and a Half Legs
Full disclosure, I'm not old enough to have grown up on analog UT sets. But my first exposure to UT was on an oscilloscope in university, so I have an appreciation for reading what the A-scan is doing without looking at the numbers. And yes, I do own that Sonatest/Balteau unit and there *is* a purely analog video in the pipeline. #laughatyourself
Thanks to Max Yates of Sonaspection for the kick a$$ tune!
Intro song: Kickin' My Heart Around
Takeaway Thieves: www.takeawaythieves.com/
Thanks to Max Yates of Sonaspection for the kick a$$ tune!
Intro song: Kickin' My Heart Around
Takeaway Thieves: www.takeawaythieves.com/
Переглядів: 1 099
Відео
Sensitivity & TCG Calibrations
Переглядів 2 тис.21 день тому
Not enough is discussed about exactly what each of these calibrations accomplishes, and why one is absolutely necessary and the other is usually superfluous. Just because there's a button there doesn't mean you have to touch it.
3D Print from HydroFORM Data
Переглядів 856Місяць тому
If you've got about 20 hours to spare, then another 20 to get it "just right", then check this out! Or go finish Tears of the Kindgdom, whatever.
AWS D1.1 Shear Wave Inspections
Переглядів 2,6 тис.2 місяці тому
You kids don't know how good you got it! When I was your age, we had to bring an abacus and mechanically calculate the attenuation factor on-site! None of this silly built-in software. Then we entered the data using punch cards into huge computers the size of a house! Now get off my lawn!
Corrosion Test Plate
Переглядів 1,9 тис.2 місяці тому
Proper specimens for training and qualification are important. So is using words good. To edit or not to edit, that is the question.
How to Set Up the HydroFORM2 on the Veo3
Переглядів 7102 місяці тому
Say you've got a yellow Lamborghini*, but you've also got a sweet, new model, midnight black HydroFORM2. Can they play nicely together? Of course they can! *okay, it's mostly black with a yellow accent, but still....
HydroFORM Setup on an X3 in 5 Minutes
Переглядів 2,6 тис.3 місяці тому
HydroFORM setup speedrun... and GO!! (Thanks to Ambient_Nature_Atmosphere for the squirrel)
Paint Marker Comparison
Переглядів 1,6 тис.3 місяці тому
I spent all of my UA-cam earnings (kinda not joking) on Amazon buying paint markers because this one time I got pissed off that my paint marker died and made a quick post on LinkedIn and lots of people made suggestions so I went way too far and tallied the recommendations and then spent lots of money and my wife was like "what?" and I was like "it's for science!" then she rolled her eyes like s...
What's That Weird Thing - Angled Ends on PAUT Cal Blocks
Переглядів 7625 місяців тому
Chop off what ya don't need.
What's That Weird Thing? Flawtech Flawbars with Ricky Morgan
Переглядів 8375 місяців тому
Ricky is one of my favourite people. And if you know him, he's probably one of your favourite people too!
Mode Conversion
Переглядів 3,4 тис.6 місяців тому
If you start in Eminor and then modulate to Gmajor, it's technically a mode conversion even though they both use the same notes. I guess it's about the tonal center? I dunno. On a related note (ba-dum), here's a video about sound you can't hear.
Quick Ones - Bolt Crack TFM
Переглядів 1,6 тис.6 місяців тому
Let's be honest, the cool thing is the thread reflections.
Shear Wave with Little Probes Equals Rayleigh Waves YUCK!
Переглядів 2,1 тис.6 місяців тому
This description is shorter than the title.
The Surface Finish of Your Cal Block is Important
Переглядів 1,8 тис.7 місяців тому
This is a video that I made all by myself. Look at me go!
Corrosion Inspection on Noisy Steel
Переглядів 3,1 тис.7 місяців тому
What started as a probability of detection video (POD) ended up as a video about a weird, noisy sample piece I got. But heck, noise still abounds and we gotta know how to do something with it.
PAUT Zero Degree Wedge Repeaters (+ Tape?)
Переглядів 3,1 тис.10 місяців тому
PAUT Zero Degree Wedge Repeaters ( Tape?)
Curved Holes in a UT Calibration Block?
Переглядів 2,2 тис.10 місяців тому
Curved Holes in a UT Calibration Block?
Backing Bar Weld and Lack of Root Pen
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Рік тому
Backing Bar Weld and Lack of Root Pen
Photoelastic Imaging of Phased Array Focusing
Переглядів 2,9 тис.Рік тому
Photoelastic Imaging of Phased Array Focusing
<PH uses SWIPE attack> <dB DROP takes 50 damage> <CRITICAL HIT>
Thanks sir🙏
I started UT in the late 70's with a USM2 /USK 6 ,you soon pick up the trigonometry ratios to determine flaw location. What has changed is the lost art of echo dynamics. Which was much easier with an analogue set. Determining a root pattern from LORF or hydrogen flake from N.M.I.s in a heavy forging. Having been a PCN examiner it is possible to get a distinction whilst failing to recognise and correctly identify any of the flaws in the exam samples. Which should be a concern, similar to radiography without Rad interpretation. I obtained my PAUT /Tofd qualification 10 years ago (not recertified it) PAUT will definatley take over from manual UT as the price of it drops and it becomes standard on UT sets. I have to admit after years of manual UT I found PAUT / Tofd in practise very boring. Last week I took part in corrosion mapping an oil processing spooling an 8 hour shift felt like two weeks.
Love your videos mate! Just about to jump into PAUT, super excited! Would love a video on your preferences for encoders, wire vs wheel encoders etc, how to use different encoders, what’s most practical for real world non test plate jobs? You’re doing gods work mate, keep this gold mine of a channel going!
I'm not surprised your sizing was inaccurate. You should only use 6db drop method on reflectors larger than the beam (Inverse Laws). Using it on a through thickness reflector like this would over size by 2-3 times. Max amp would have been very accurate if applied correctly.
I agree with it being used only on flaws larger than the beam, but I would also extend that to only large, purely planar flaws, which essentially limits it only to laminations. Alas, there is a lot of misunderstanding around it, and it continues to be taught as some sort of viable tool when in most cases it's just misleadingly simple.
Thank you for the shout out x
I always teach my students the 10/8 V-path in my UT classes. Love the Carolinas connections in this video: Adam Daniels at Sonaspection, FlawTech, and Vermon NDT.
Absolutely excellent training. I’m not out in the field doing the UT two step anymore, but I really could have benefited from these videos back when I was out in the field, I would find SOMETHING and didn’t know how to interpret, and I would facetime a friend who is a jedi master of UT so he could watch my screen.
1st again!
thank you Paul for taking the time and effort to break things down...i appreciate your dedication.
Awesome videos man, I appreciate that you do these. It is good to have a practical refresher to look at if I need a reminder of how something works. Besides I see you write your reports in crayon like I do so we are on the same page 🤣
Would you be able to do a video on explaining Refracted L Waves using a DMA-DLA Probe for austenitic stainless steels? A quick concept on why they are needed and quick set ups with the angle sweeps.
I just gotta get me one of them fancy probes. Be right back (car noises, exhaust smell)
i cant believe i'm geeking out over how cool this drone is
thank u so much, i appreciate the explanation
Like to see more videos on MUT as well
"When in doubt blame it on wave mode conversion" - As I've always told the new guys The near side signal can be very large in amplitude and appear on the full weld in some piping I've work with. Visual, Manual UT, MT, RT, see nothing just a slighty concave at the edge of the root bead and I've no idea why it's so large.
Same video for velocity calibrations, not always a requirement if the +/- is within code allowance.
You should mention Praveen Pilgam here lol
RIP my boy Praveen. Probably got his certs from a cereal box.
Shouldn't have watched this half way through my course.... Thanks Paul!
Great video as always. Thanks. xox
Does this logic work the same if the sensitivity reflector is a different size than the TCG reflectors?
Sorta, yeah. It will just skew things but after the TCG you should be fine. Even if you ran the sensitivity calibration on a radius (as it was originally intended) and not a hole or a notch, the TCG will fix everything.
So just wedge delay then TCG?
Pretty much, yeah.
@@hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201 Hai could you provide a precal vedio for sectorial and linear using single index how to do the accurate precal please make a vedio..... Thank you
Thank you 🙏so difficult to make anderstand to customer or level 3 because of codes and normes mistake. Kévin Grivel, NDT specialist in France.
It was indeed a nice explanation. There are still many folks around word doesn't know the basics of different calibration. This will help them to understand better.
Thanks sr, very useful.
Thanks 🙏🏼
Thank you very much for your fantastic videos as always. Just wondering, do you have any plans to do anything about TOFD? , probably it's something missing on your channel. Peace, best of luck ;)
I just ran TOFD this week. But it was thin wall and a little underwhelming. Gotta get me some of them Limbo TOFD probes from GB and try again.
@hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201 good luck with that one, hopefully it goes better next time!
Ha! I’m 1st!
Please share about UT technique T joint welding with backing bar in AWS D1.1.
The learning curve of BEAM TOOL is very steep
Good afternoon from Western Australia; I've been religiously watching Paul's videos for many, many moons and I always find something that I didn't know that I didn't know about UT, so thank you Paul for all your efforts. I am considering buying sonatest wave, and have been searching for a "6 months or 1 year" type of reviews to see how this instrument performs in real life situations. After all, UT testing is a messy business so I am wondering how this arrangement works where couplant is present and will inevitably transfer onto the screen, sometimes in quantities. Does this arrangement creates a limitation as far as controlling the instrument? I would appreciate any feedback from users, Thank you, Chris
The Wave has a pretty good resistance to couplant blobs. Physical buttons with a non-touch screen still have advantages, but in most cases the Wave layout (all screen, no buttons) wins out... unless you're in the messiest of situations and trying to press on the screen. You always need a clean fingertip or knuckle if you want to keep the screen blob free.
Which CAD program are you using to create your surface? I have Inventor and Fusion. I would like to try doing this if you have a link to a tutorial for creating a surface using UT data.
I use Alibre
@@hollowayndtengineeringinc.5201 Do you have a link to a good tutorial? I've not been successful in locating one for attempting this myself. Thanks!
Interesting concept, as additive manufacturing is now a thing, I wonder if you could record a profile, print out of a metallic material and start the chain again by scanning the same 'print' getting the same signal response - just wondering if a metallic printed material would lend itself to scanning with useable results?
Hrm... like dubbing a cassette back in the 80's!
It does not work well. I've tried a number of things to make this work, such as even going as far as extreme heat and low z offset to force the layer lines together. there is still too much molecular gap for sound to punch through nicely. My next attempt will be with an epoxy resin mold of a step wedge. if that works nicely then we can 3d print a mold of any object and proceed but the velocity will differ greatly obviously
Never considered using PAUT data like this. Ive sent mesh surfaces from Creaform scans to recreate dents and metal loss on scaled models piping, cool mementos if nothing else. Have you tried recreating weld defects using 100% infill? Think it would be a unique way to develop scan plans or teach newer techs. Essentially simulated flaw plates at a major fraction of cost. Only doubt is how well sound would travel, think the layering from printing would cause issue.
I thought about it, but sound won't go anywhere in an FDM print. Well I shouldn't say that... I did print 100% infill PETG sheet, about 2mm thick, with 0.05mm layer height and ironing after each pass. And I can get through it with my 10MHz pen probe... barely.
I was looking up what QUPA PAUT meant. But you basically summed it up for me. I Understand that it’s an instrument to inspect welds. Now, since I’m a helper in welding, do you think I could take an inspection class and move past the welding part? To be an inspector?
Yup. But there's no turning back... NDT is the most amazing thing ever!
Just got into structural steel and I am using a Sonotest d20+ your videos are so helpful
Please explain AWS CLASS X and CLASS R INDICATION level sizing
Some codes just seem to want to make your life hard on purpose :(
Hello, I think probe resolution verification is missed here.. .
For sure.. that's why it's a general overview. Can't teach all the nooks and crannys of AWS D1.1 in 5 minutes.
I think there is an error in the drawing shown in the AWS D1.1 standard (Figure 8.13-Typical IIW Type Block). The depth for a 50 mm diameter hole is shown as 23 mm. The sound speed equivalent of 23 mm Plexiglas is 50 mm for steel. AWS D1.1 block prices are high due to the error.😆😆
This is really helpful, don't do a lot of AWS specific inspection here in New Zealand so will remember this when it crops up again
Wonderful Paul I really enjoy all your videos, the way you explain is pretty clear and useful 😀 congratulations 🎊 and thank you so much for all this material!!! Go Canada 🇨🇦 jojo nice T-shirt 👌
Thanks Holloway, last Few week ago I have told my client about the AWS setting that there is no DAC, because AWS uses the Ref SDH 1.5 V1 block
Can you talk about W59 reporting and surface cracks in HAZ zones? I had difficulties with how close some cracks are to the toe of the weld. Thanks. (From W59 CGSB exam)
In fact I might!
This is very useful but i have a doubt How can you add scanning db ? Its"This column refers to sound path distance; NOT material thickness....
Yes, so just look at the range you are using for inspection
Thanks I found this video very useful. Please make a video about how to perform UT sensitivity calibration for root indication accordance to API RP 2X Level C acceptance criteria 😊🙏
Hi sr, great video, do you considere, a video about paut in api1104? . Thanks
+1
Thanks Santiago, I need to learn more about it myself
How do you determine the difference between a gap in between the bar and test plate and an indication?
You have to scan from both sides
good job keep it up
in 1:12, why the path of echo 2 doesn't or why isn't there an echo follows this way: initial pulse-> reflect from the bottom -> pass through the interface between coating& part -> reflect from the top surface of the coating -> back into the object, reflect from the bottom of the part, received by the transducer?
It does, it's just that it's so closely spaced because the coating thickness is thin, you can't resolve it. First one back wins, and that's the at the coating to part interface.
Is it the difference of acoustic impedance between the coating and the part that causes the first one to dominate?