Відео

A few people have already pointed this out. I am sorry for not spending more time researching how the pattern should work. I will do better next time.

Well now you know :) It also took me quite a lot of time to figure out how to use it.

I am glad to hear that.

Hi, yes the assemblies are converted to C++ and then to machine code. When building with IL2CPP, it is harder to extract the code since only the machine code is included in the build. Using assemblies should not introduce any security risks.

@@freedomcoding That's great. Thanks 👍

Enjoy!

Glad you think so! Thanks for watching.

Thank you very much! I will.

Thanks!

Glad to hear that.

I agree that event bus is hard to debug. Still in some cases it can be very useful. Thanks for sharing your experience!

This sounds like an event channel system. I made something similiar - ua-cam.com/video/nJkYCU8Qe8o/v-deo.html

Thanks, I will! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too.

Thank you very much!

You are welcome!

Enjoy!

Try to create the signing certificate once more and make sure it is of the correct type(Apple Development). I know that these certificates are pretty annoying to work with...

@@freedomcoding Well, I think I need a developer certificate too and for that I need to register my device. But is it safe to register a VM mac device?

@@m.harunakdas6970 Unfortunately, I don't remember whether you need to register your device. I don't recommend doing so, but it is up to your personal consideration. This video was mainly for learning purposes, as running MacOS on a device not made by Apple violates their terms and conditions.

Glad you think so!

Hi, you can right click in the project -> create -> rendering -> URP (or other) asset. I don't think it is necessary for Cinemachine to work, but surely you can create it.

@@freedomcoding Ok thanks! I

You're welcome!

Hi, I think it should be possible but you would need to handle the integration on your own. I don't think they are made to be used together.

I am glad the video was useful!

Hi, I suppose you are having problems with mining to the sides, as with my system, only mining down works. If you want to mine down, you need to modify the y position but when mining to the sides you need to modify the x or the z position. I think you could achieve this by getting the players' forward vector and adjusting the position by that amount. You may also have problems with insufficient vertex count. For instance, if you have a plane and you dig down and to the side, there would not be enough vertices to allow that (when digging cave-like structures). For that reason, you would also need to dynamically add vertices to the already existing mesh.

@@freedomcoding Hello, thank you so much for your response! I wanted to clarify that I am not using your script or system; I’ve been trying to build my own mechanics with guidance. My goal is to create a mining mechanic for GameObjects (like a wall of ore), where the object deforms to create actual holes (like digging a pit), not just distortions. Currently, my script modifies the mesh, but instead of forming holes, it just shifts the vertices around. I am not trying to mine down like your system but instead create a more versatile mechanic that allows mining in all directions. Could you suggest a method to implement this? Are there tools or concepts I should explore to achieve this kind of realistic resource extraction? Thank you again for your time and help!

@@sternsascha1993 You are welcome. I think that the only concept you need to know of is the transform.Forward. That should be enough to get you the correct direction in which the player is mining and shift the vertices in that direction.

I will be working on the tutorial about event bus soon!

Hi, I wouldnt say that the way you learn is the most important part of the process. Of course you have to experiment and find the way that suits you. It is mainly about working every day and working especially hard even when you dont feel like it. Just trust the process and continue what you are doing.

@freedomcoding got it thanks for replying

Good morning!

No problem!

Thank you! That is what I am focusing on the most right now. Is it expired? I just tried it and it works allright. I am not sure about the link in the video but in the description it works.

Thanks for watching!

Thank you! There is still a lot I can learn. Feel free to take a look at my website in case you want me to help you or do some freelance work - freedom-coding.com/

Nice! I am glad you liked it <3

Enjoy!

You are welcome!

Thank you. I know this version of event system is not the most performant but I think it could be more convenient to use for people who don't want to code everything. There are always pros and cons to different implementations of such systems.

If you don't mind, could you please share your solution of event system?? Thanks in advance.

@@nexgen.graphics Sure, here are the project files - github.com/Freedom-Coding/DesignPatterns_EventChannel

Hi, I am glad you liked the video. 1. There are not many limitations but as you create more events you may end up having many classes storing data specific to each event. As I mentioned in the video, decoupling is generally good but in this case, it can make debugging harder especially when you call the events in multiple places and have many functions or scripts that are dependent on the events being called. 2. Event channels should obviously not be used everywhere. If you did that, there could be performance issues since there would be many MonoBehaviours listening to the events. Using event channels too much could also slow down the development process as it involves a lot of dragging and dropping. 3. In that case, you could use the event bus. Because it is centralized you could create a queue and then invoke the events based on priority. You could also decide not to call certain events when it doesn't make sense. (Do not add health when the player is dead...) 4. The events are processed as they are called. If you call multiple events in the same frame, I am not sure if Unity can guarantee that they will be executed in the order they were added. Regarding sending information from the event to the listeners, that is random with the current implementation. Since all of the listeners are registered to their corresponding events OnEnable, we don't know which of the listeners will be called first. This could be handled by prioritizing or adding delays. 5. I think that the events should never be ignored but I didn't do any testing regarding that. 6. The current implementation doesn't allow that, but it could surely be added. It is only up to you how you want the events to execute and in which order. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! Have a nice day.

Thank you for your reply,​@@freedomcoding

Then I did my job well. Thank you for watching!

Hi, you are right. I created this inventory system a long time ago when I didn't know much about better coding practices.

Hi, these patterns are already on my list for some time. I will get to them soon hopefully. There are many other topics I would love to cover as well.

Yes, it probably could be used for a save system. I never thought about it this way. Thanks for sharing your ideas!

Love to hear that!

You are welcome <3

Nice! I will probably get back to multiplayer some time in the future.

I am glad you liked it! You could make a NetworkVariable storing the team of each player. Based on that you could spawn the players together, make sure they can't damage the players in their team etc. This is certainly possible even without Matchmaker.

Glad it was helpful!

Hi, I will put it on my list and definitely take a look at it sometime. Zenject is still being updated or not? I am glad you like my content this much <3. Unfortunately, I haven't had much time recently to make more videos for supporters...