Відео

The Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 and yeah, i used DEHANCER to colorgrade the footage.

Yes, because it's an EF lens. I use an RF to EF adapter from MEIKE.

Hi. Az R10 erősebb mindenben a 100-nál. Nem tudom magyar forintban mi különbség van köztük, de az R10 minden specifikációban "jobb", többet nyújt.A Attól is függ milyen szinten vagy. Ha életeben nem fényképeztél és tanulnod kell, bőven el lehet kezdeni R100-al. Viszont az R10-ben jobb szenzor, jobb autofókusz, forgatható érintőképernyő, míg az R100ban nem. Ha egyszer videózni szeretnél, simán tudsz 4k-ban stb. Ha ez a kettő van kinézve, átgondolnám inkább az R10-et, attól függ mennyi pénz szánható rá!

​@@reyesproductionDKRendben, köszönöm!

Sziaa. CANON EOS 2000D ezen is gondolkodtam. Ajánlod vagy mit ajánlasz? Csak canon legyen es ne olyan drága max 300k. Ez lesz az első fényképezőgépem de telefonnal űzőm hobbi szinten.

​@@attilaandrasik Ah, oké. Ha most kezded teljesen, igazából bármivel tanulhatsz! :D Ahogy néztem olya 40-50 ezer különbség van köztük. Egy 2000d és egy hozzá kit objektív bőven jó! Rengeteget lehet tanulni vele. Különbség, hogy az egyik tükörreflexes, másik tükör nélküli. (Újabb system) De mindkettőt használják mai napig.

​@@reyesproductionDKrendben, köszönöm! Legjobbakat kívánom neked!

Yeah thats Nice. Why not R7? Has IBIS, LOG, 10 bit, weather sealed, dual card slot. Yes it’s aps-c not full frame But you get tons of features. And 30+ MP sensor

@@reyesproductionDK The canon R6 Cost too much but the R8 only cost 1300 or 1400

@kellcoleStyleEnt yeah I know But I am talking about R7. It’s around 1400 too! And Maybe “better” than R8. Depends what you want to shoot.

@@reyesproductionDK right I ma look in to it now

Land it on +0. To use this technique usually you have to use log to shoot. But because i didn't shoot in log, you can easily see the exposure. Also using histogram

@@reyesproductionDK Thank you!

A 43mm filter!

The r10 is a pretty good choice!🔥🥳

@@reyesproductionDK definitely 🙏🇵🇬💯, greetings all the way from PNG

Oh.. Sorry if i clickbait you! :D The R10 is considered as a cheap, beginner level camera. I agree that it's more expensive than your phone or something! And as you can see i can't afford anything else also! :D So i understand you with the 1000Eur price. The lens is around 1100 also. That's why i said that :D

@@reyesproductionDK yeh the prices are insane. I just started photography too and bought the R10. So far it's a nice experience and totally worth it as an entry level camera, to get comfortable with photography. Will upgrade the lens soon - the kit lens does it's job so far 😅

@@isozarr Oh, cool! Have fun. I recommend to check out SIGMA new RF mount lenses! It's much cheaper. 600-700 eur the new 18-50mm f.28

@@reyesproductionDK ah, ty for the info! Will check it out! So third party lenses like sigma start to produce for the RF mounts ? Or do I have to get an adapter first ?

@@isozarr YES THEY DO! That's a huge news with Sigma. 6 new lenses for RF mount without adapters.: www.sigma-global.com/en/contents/sigma_rfmount_lenses/ And the price is pretty good for it. (Just the 18-50mm is out right now but they are coming this year)

I am Super Happy about that 🫡😁

If you mean your video called:"Skills i learned making videos" i just checked it. Really nice work! :)

@@reyesproductionDK Exactly dude, thanks so much for your subscription

Maaan! Thats Soo Good to know 🔥🫣

Thank you! Well it’s hard, my personal opinion I would go for the 35 instead of 50mm

Hi. It's not the correct question you should ask. There is no "better than the other" But i am gladly help and share my opinion! :) I can see the a6400 a bit cheaper than the R10 with the kitlens. I think the R10 is stronger in a lot of things. First, you can enable HDR PQ mode and it gives 10bit colors to edit. (It's good for colorgrading, cinematic video etc.) Has viewfinder and it's a good thing for photographers. I really want to switch to Sony after Canon but not because it's better than the other. IF YOU KNOW the next camera in the future and what do you want to shoot, i would get from that brand. For example if i knew that i want a sony camera, i would go for a Sony. (Because you doN't have to change lenses and all the other stuffs) If you know you want to be a canon shooter in the future, get canon, and canon compatible lenses.

I used the SIGMA 24-70mm f2.8 (Fullframe lens)

Hi, Thank you so much! And since this video I am even better 😄 But it’s only because of practice! Feel free to contact me and We can check why is your videos looks like that 😂😄 I would gladly help If I can! Find me on insta: reyesproduktion (Production with letter “K”)

Sad to hear. :/ you mean 24-105? I only now that not 150. Btw If it’s RF mount, you can easily adapt on the r10. If it’s EF mount, you need an EF to RF adapter. If it’s 24-105 f4 then the Aperture is f4 all the way zoomed in and out. It’s a Nice lens But for me, for video the f4 wouldnt be enough. Rather get an f 2.8 (But this lens would be a Nice upgrade for you, from the kit lens!

@@reyesproductionDK do you think the new sigma 18-50 2.8 dcdn is good for videography. i don't have a gimbal , so for videography I can get the sigma and the gimbal and still save enough money. do you think its a better option compared to 24-105 f4?

Yeah it is a hard question! It depends on what do you want to do. The sigma + gimbal would be a nice combo. But if you pick the 24-105 f4, you have to learn to make really good handheld. (And if you do, you will be king ;) ) I have a gimbal but i don't use it so much. Unless you working with the camera everyday all day i would pick the 24-105 instead. You won't use the gimbal as much as you think. And do you want to limit yourself like everytime you want to shoot, you need the gimbal? Btw, if you learn, you will learn everything and you can make good videos with any gear! If you have the budget pick anything you want. The SIGMA is good because it's native RF lens, no adapter needed. Small, lightweight. The 24-105 is a bigger, heavier. And have better range. What do you want to shoot btw?

Thank youu! The 50mm 1.8 is also pretty good! You will be surprised, just wait! 😇 only the Zoom capability missing 😄

Yeah this lens is a beast But very expensive. Even for me 😂 But I was a little bit snob with this lens. If I could go back I would Still Pick 24-70 because it’s a very versatile lens for video also But Maybe a cheaper tamron or something!

I saw the new sigma 18-50 around 650usd.

@@reyesproductionDK Yeah I saw it around that price too! But it’s not available in Mexico at the time, so the price goes a little bit up, but I will get it as soon as as I can!

@INFChiquito ooh I see! We will see. I would love to try them out thats sure 😂

Hey Thank you so much! I hope you will achieve the same or more! 🥰 Btw thats a Nice setup already. Yep the sigma 24-70 was expensive. BUT! Did you check out the new sigma native RF 18-50mm 2.8 around 650$. I want to check that lens out too at some point. I will definitely come up more videos! 📽️

​@@reyesproductionDK Actually yes i did search for that lens quite a lot. Only downside is that lans has no "IS". Sure 10-18 has bad aperture but there is no other "kinda" budget lens with IS for wideangle except rfs 10-18. I need that lens first because I shoot a lot handheld videos. And that sigma 18-50 or a used 24-70 will probably be the third lens I buy. ☺

@mustafagurel1545 yeah I absolutely understand that! I have stabilizer in the lens But my setup is so heavy alone, I wouldnt need that stabilizer anyways. 😁 I recommend to rig It out a bit heavier so It will make really good handheld results. (I mean If you do videos) for photo i just use the lens and body alone.

@@reyesproductionDK Yes i saw your setup, it looks quite heavy 😅 Thank you, now i think maybe i can buy 18 50 with a smallrig first. kit lens already has IS maybe ı can get by with it a bit 😁

Hi, if i understand you correctly. Yes i shot this with HDR pq and in 4K

😂😂 I hear you! 😁 Thank you btw! I can make stable handheld shots with the R10 BUT it’s only because of the rigged out R10. The V mount battery is heavy, the lens is Super heavy. The whole setup between 3-4 KG, thats the secret of good handheld. (With no ibis body)

Thanks for noticing It! 🔥😁

Niice, I think K&F is the best right now. Have all kind of filters and affordable prices for Us!

Oh Thank you it means a lot!! 🫣😁 I will never stop 🔥🤝

Thank you brother!!🫡😁

Hi, it’s a hard thing. Yes the 1.8 is a good choice for low light. And of course better than 2.8 for example. But sadly the r10 not a lowlight beast. You could try out the 50mm 1.8 too. It is much cheaper I think.

Woow Nice! Have fun with that! 🤞🔥

Yes! I understand you! I can only help in Davinci Resolve. And just explain It so Simply now. Use 4 noded. 1-2-3-4. The First and last is ColorSpaceTransfor. The first node will be:input gamma: Rec2100>St8400 Output: DavinciWideGamut>DavinciIntermediet The last node (nr 4.) Input: DavinciWideGamut>DavinciIntermediet Output gamma: Rec.709>Gamma2.4 AND! All the Edit, tweek, colorgrade, exposure has to be done BETWEEN These 2 nodes. Because at the beginning you set your color space to DavinciWideGamut, you allow to your footage to be stretched out without falling apart. If you understand me. But I have a video about “HDR pq” and I just said some things there. Check it out maybe it will also help. And if you have more question feel free to ask 🎉

@@reyesproductionDK I’ll check out your video, I use FCPx so I’m unsure how much of this can translate to FCP. I do shoot primarily in Sony slog 3 and Canon Clog3. So far my canon converts from hdr PQ has left blotchy skin and 8bit look. The Sony HLG 3 registers 17 stops of dynamic range but looses approx 4 stops of DR when converting to rec709

@greenlightstudios3469 Oh yeah I get It.. I will look into It in finalcut just for fun 😁 I just checked your Channel. You had some cool projects🤝

The SIGMA 24-70mm f/2.8 🔥

Hahh, Thank you 😇😁 Well it’s always room to be better 🤷🏽 Especially when you film alone.. yourself 😂

Thank you for sharing!! 😄 I agree. But! I messed up because I zoomed in too much. Because If you see the source of the light Maybe it’s not that fake. And also I didnt Edit the flate there. Actually I used a flare filter on the lens. But yeah. It would be better If the audience could see the Sun for example.

Yes sir! I will 🤝 what editing software do you use btw?

Davinci but the free version, am i cooked?

Really good choice! I will come up with colorgrading in Davinci then! 😇 my favorite software 🔥

No, it was just the normal, H.264 8 bit footage.

Davinci is the best!! 🔥🤘

Thank you to be here! 😇 I will continue this series and maybe I can help beginners 🤝

Hi. Ai am glad! 😁 Yes We Will have editing, Music, colorgrade in this series! 🔥

@@reyesproductionDK Thats awsm!!

The sigma 24-70mm and on about 35mm

Hey!! Thank you so much! 😇 I made this and the whole series for really beginners. Maybe I can help them a bit 👌

@@reyesproductionDK thanks, i would love to join you!

Well, when i bought i had really small budget to upgrade my Nikon D3500. I wanted to go into videography and for the price this Canon R10 was a pretty good deal. 4K video. And if you learn to use the camera and all the settings you can get really good result with it! For shorts and photos it is a good camera. 24mp sensor for photos at my level is more than enough. But if it's still expensive you can check out the Canon EOS R50 too. A bit cheaper.

I use DavinciResolve now, but when i used PremierePro i just searched video here on UA-cam. Try out:"PremierePro best export settings" And you can basically copy what they do and you'll get the same result! 😉

Hii. Thank you! :) Well. I'm afraid that a 20w would be weak for it. I'm starting to feel that even my 60w is not enough for me anymore. I just checked that MC20C 20w light. It's about the same price as a 60w light from COLBOR or even Godox. Why don't just want to get a 60w instead of a 20?

@@reyesproductionDK because id love to use it like filming outside, or i dont know, ive been thinking about the colbor cl60r but i dont know, there’s so many options to choose from ive been thinking about the zhyiun b100 too but its way out of my budget. Ahh these lights are my worst nightmare like ever

​@@atis_films Ah, okay i understand you.. Yes it is hard.. And i don't have any experience light up a scene outside yet. But i recommend to check out as many videos as you can about the topic. What others use etc. Because it has to be able to run from an external battery for example.

@@reyesproductionDK thanks cuz like im in that situation that im a beginner that knows something but not thst much

@@reyesproductionDK sorry to annoy you but i have a last question, how do you remove the fishing line in your commercials using davinci resolve?

You see right. But It could be even R7 😉 R10 btw!

❌ R10 ✅🤫

For this video i used DEHANCER. It is a film emulator plugin! But you can achieve this look with the built-in tools in DavinciResolve. So yeah, i use DavinciResolve to edit/colorgrade my videos. What do you use?

I shoot in HDR PQ and correct in Final Cut Pro

Ahh okay! I dont know anything about finalcut 😏

Love the R10 content though! For entry level you can get some pretty clean footage!

@MrMatthew3369 Yess! I just took a Music video. I will share that soon 🤘

Noooo. It’s a Canon 🤫

Yesss. The cheaper one! 🤔😁

R10 btw!