![ivan jackman](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 29
- 160 290
ivan jackman
Приєднався 29 вер 2014
Audient ASP 4816 Routing tips
Short video showing some examples of ways to route signal on an inline console.
Переглядів: 6 934
Відео
Audient ASP4816 Overview/Channel path
Переглядів 9 тис.3 роки тому
A brief overview of the features of the Audient ASP4016 mixing console.
How do SSL eq's sound? Waves, Solid State Logic and Plugin Alliance Compared!
Переглядів 2,1 тис.4 роки тому
In this Video I compare SSL EQ plugins to see the differences between the different versions of ssl eq and the diffent makes of plugin. Plugins reviewed are as follows: Solid State Logic E channel strip Plugin Alliance BX Console 4000 E Brown knob Plugin Alliance BX Console 4000 E Black knob Waves CLA Mixhub Waves E Channel Plugin Alliance BX Console 4000 G Orange knob Plugin Alliance BX Consol...
SPL PASSEQ Plugin Review
Переглядів 3 тис.4 роки тому
In this video I review the Passeq by Plugin Alliance. I briefly go through its features listen to it on audio and have a look at the EQ curves. Items missed in the video are the M/S button allowing the eq to be used in M/S mode and the 4 save buttons allowing you to deom different settings. www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanMixingandMastering/ hellfire-studio.ie/
AMEK EQ 200 Review
Переглядів 4,6 тис.4 роки тому
Review of the Plugin Alliance Amek 200 EQ plugin. In this review I go through the functions of the EQ, use it on source material, And compare it to the Sonnex Oxford EQ and the Weiss EQ1. New Secret Weapon - wild one & I draw fire watch ua-cam.com/video/3-Xok5GXjes/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/channels/QfApi0bIP3pbGnlP-P3WQQ.html www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanMixingandMastering/ hellfir...
How to get your stems out of Pro Tools
Переглядів 2434 роки тому
Quick video explaining how to export audio to send to a mix engineer www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Softube Weiss EQ1 review
Переглядів 7 тис.4 роки тому
Overview and review of the Weiss Digital Mastering EQ. Features of the EQ and its dynamics section explained and reviewed and the eq compared to FabFliter Pro-Q 2 Plugin can be found here www.softube.com/weiss-eq1 Thanks to Pretty Beast for the use of their track ua-cam.com/video/gLpTJFWmYxw/v-deo.html www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanMixingandMastering/ hellfire-studio.ie/
Adding Drum Samples to Live Drums
Переглядів 1,8 тис.4 роки тому
Quick Tips In this video I will show how you can add drum samples to a live drum performance recorded without a click track in Pro Tools. Using Beat Detective to lock your samples to the performance of the drummer. www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanMixingandMastering/ hellfire-studio.ie/ Thumbnail Photo by Matthijs Smit on Unsplash
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 9 Mix Buss and Automation
Переглядів 6704 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 8 Backing Vocals
Переглядів 4474 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 7 Reverb
Переглядів 6144 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 6 Basic mix buss processing
Переглядів 6424 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 5 Vocals
Переглядів 6424 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 4 Piano + Hammond
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 3 bass + Guitar
Переглядів 1 тис.4 роки тому
Educational video about mixing. Multitrack used in video can be found here www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ www.ivanjackman.com/ IvanJackmanM... hellfire-studio.ie/
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 2 Drums
Переглядів 2 тис.4 роки тому
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 2 Drums
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 1 routing prep
Переглядів 1,8 тис.4 роки тому
Mixing a track in Pro Tools series - Part 1 routing prep
Brian Charette on Hammond Organ in Hellfire Studios
Переглядів 3546 років тому
Brian Charette on Hammond Organ in Hellfire Studios
Pro Tools setup for recording a band part 1 - Tracking
Переглядів 18 тис.6 років тому
Pro Tools setup for recording a band part 1 - Tracking
Gear run down for analog mixing at Hellfire Studios
Переглядів 2,7 тис.6 років тому
Gear run down for analog mixing at Hellfire Studios
Pro Tools setup for recording a band part 2 - Overdubs
Переглядів 5 тис.6 років тому
Pro Tools setup for recording a band part 2 - Overdubs
Soundcraft Ghost (mix B) monitor section
Переглядів 3,2 тис.9 років тому
Soundcraft Ghost (mix B) monitor section
Great Video ! . . . I appreciate You reading the values, as they are hard to see . . . ! . . . And . . . I appreciate You Showing the Curves . . . ! . . . So, This Video is Exactly what I needed to See . . . ! . . . 🙂 (-;
Which two audio interface do you need to use it in the DAW?
This is such a specific question and I’m surprised that there’s a video on this haha thanks
Amazing. Thanks.
very helpful set of vids mate thanks
Thanks!
Excellent walk through! much appreciated!
Nice! Dumb question: where does the signal go to tape? Right after the preamp? And where does it go to outboard gear? I guess the patchbay gets connected at several points along the signal flow, right?
The short answer is "from wherever you want". Almost all of the sections can be engaged or disengaged and routed in various ways. For example, if you are recording a kick drum you could go pre-dynamics-eq-small fader-tape and use the large fader to monitor levels in the control room without affecting the level that's going into the tape/DAW. You could also disengage any of the sections Same thing with outboard gear, combining the routing matrix and the patchbay you can "interrupt" the signal at any point in the path and send it to and back from multiple points. Let's say you are recording a mono room mic and you want to use an outboard preamp like a 1073, then the SSL eq and then to an outboard compressor (think your typical room mic nuked with a Distressor or an 1176), you can do it all via the patchbay. This amount of flexibility is why the SSL became an industry standard for mixing.
So the audient cant go straight into the mac? Especially since the new ones have no space for cards. Would optical or usb-c work if mfg’s chose to go that route?
Thx man im gonna graduate thx to you 🙏
Did you used an avb switch to connect the 2 card? Also did you connected them trough a pci or stand alone? Thanks
This is great... how about doing it again and referencing it to the SSL UC1 plug-in controller. controls i.e. what = what on the UC1.
9-30-2023" I have finished this series > thank u verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry much and i hope u still give a series like this which has many information thanx alot Mr.
good video, thank you. We love our motu interfaces because of their flexibility. they are perfect for large setups!
HELLO
Hey Ivan, Idk if you know, but with your expertise you might. I want to connect a Motu 24Ao to QLab on osx, do you perhaps know if that would be possible at all? Thanks in advance.
I can’t say for sure as I’ve no experience using the two together. But it seems Qlab has support for AVB which the 24Ao uses, so it sounds most likely!
@@ivanjackman Hi, thanks for the reply. I will give it a go in the near future.
MC MAN
IVAN
excellent, thanks!
Hi, Ivan I'm not sure if you'll have an answer to this question. Where I work we have an Audient ASP 8024 and since I've started here it hasnt been used so I'm getting it all worked out and up and running again so we can get the recording studio reopened. But the only thing we're having trouble with on the desk is the comms mic. I have no trouble getting signal into the desk and routing wherever I need to, but the comms mic signal doesn't appear to go anywhere. I can't quite tell where its is supposed to be routed through, as the buttons don't send the comms mic through the hearback nor live room monitors when selected. I just wondered if you have any ideas to troubleshoot this issue?
Strange, when you hit the tb button it should route the signal to the foldback section, when you press Slate, it should route to the groups
Thank you for that video. That was very helpful. I have the same console and iam currently facing a problem i can't solve. Channel 13-16 don't seem to work as they should be. If I am sending a signal into those channels I see it gets recognised on the input meter. However the signal doesn't seem to get any further. It doesn't reach the busses or the mixbus. I don't have a clue what's wrong. On all other channels it works just fine. Only on channel 13-16 (with exactly the same settings like the other channels) it doesn't work. Do you have an idea what the problem could be?
You may need to contact Audient! Just recently channel 13 started making noise on our console, I sent a video of the problem to Audient and they diagnosed the problem as a faulty opamp, they are sending out replacement parts this week. They have been very helpful with any problems the desk has had over last few years.
@@ivanjackmanThank you. It's great that they are so supportive. I hope i can do a replacement myself. My biggest fear is to have it being send back to the uk
Thanks! I couldn't figure out what the small faders were for in other videos. This is super tempting.
This is great video! It's really nice to see what you can do with this kit.
I want to understand basic configuration of the two units with an analogue console, as a total newb. Assuming... mics/lines into the console, direct outs from console into 24AI; 24AI into 24AO; 24AO into power amp and into computer. That correct? Do I actually NEED the 24AO? Assuming I do if I want to monitor the signal via speakers or a headphone amp. Also, how do I run the 24AO to power amp, being that it doesn't have stereo master out? That's where it feels like my configuration is probably wrong. Please advise! 🤞🏼
Hi Nick, in this setup the direct outputs of the mic/line channels, go to the 24ai which has 24 analog inputs. the 24ao has 24 analog outputs which connect to the 24 tape return inputs on the desk (line inputs of the monitor section of the desk). to listen to audio you are recording eg from a mic, you would route the channnel in question to the mix (stereo master fader) and in the master section you would choose to monitor the mix and so the audio would go to the monitor outputs, which will be patched to your speakers ( these could be active or passive which would need a power amp). to listen to audio (in stereo) from the computer you would route the audio out to 2 of the 24 outputs on the soundcard, these will appear on the tape return channels (output 1= tape return channel 1) and you would press the mix button on this channel to get the signal to the master section and then on to the monitors. Soloing a channel would also route the signal to your speakers. the point being the speakers are connected to the monitor outputs of the desk. The 24ai has no outputs and the 24ao has no inputs, so without a mixing desk to connect to, these are probably not suitable soundcards.
@@ivanjackman This is great, thanks so much. I have the units. My old analogue desk doesn't have 24 take return inputs. I was thinking about buying an Allen & Heath Zed 428. This has 24 channel "inserts" and a stereo "matrix out". Assuming that's essentially the same thing? It doesn't have monitor outs, though, just master outs.
@@ivanjackman Basically the Allen & Heath Zed 428 doesn't have monitor outs, just master outs and it doesn't have 24 channel send and returns, just channel outs, so could I use the "insert" inputs on the desk and run the master stereo outs to the speakers and rely on the usb to listen/mix in Protools? Sorry for singling you out as the font of all knowledge but there's scant information online.
@@nickmitchellmaiato6717 Hi Nick, if you haven’t already purchased the zed I would say don’t. It not having monitor outputs is a real negative, as it means the solos will only go to the headphones output and if your mixing on the desk not having the solo functionality seems like it would become an issue. Have you considered the SSL big six desk, it’s slightly more expensive but has a 16 channel soundcard built in. Much higher sound quality and easier to use over all. For same price as the zed plus the two Motu featured in my vid you could afford two of the ssl desks which can be setup to work as one desk, that would give you 32 in and out, eq compressors ssl mix buss etc.
@@ivanjackman I already have the MOTUs. Hmm. Will look at other desks, thanks.
This is video that the Pros don’t show you. They just waste your time talking about uses boring stories of what they did 40 years ago. This is the video I’ve been waiting on. A+++ 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thank you for the kind words!
Didn’t realize how plastic this is….how’s it holding up?
That’s why it’s 20 grand instead of 80, other than a faulty meter bridge that audient replaced under warranty with their own tech, it’s holding up great! These are used by a lot of colleges, and so they seem to stand up well to students learning on them!
Super clean eq , disliked it at first but it is dope once getting used to it, it will be a mainstay on masters, still love Q3 but Weiss is an another animal Massenberg UAD one comes close or equal to weiss as well! Goodstuff ✌🏼Cheers
This is gold
Thank you sir!
How do you find the stone walls for recording, i have a very similar space for my modest recording set up with my band. I find it terrible for a live room but good for recording with headphones on.
U r great sir but I cant see Mastering and final print tutorial
hi what is the p k light for the red light
It shows an overload, some consoles didn’t have the meter bridge so it’s an important warning feature
@@ivanjackman thank you
The camera work is awful ---- makes one dizzy. Learn how to do video.
substance is good but the camera work is not great
R u irish dude?
He's Ukrainian.
Ciao. Complimenti per il tutorial molto ben fatto. potresti darmi il titolo del multitrack per poterlo scaricare. Vorrei provare a mixarlo seguendo i consigli del tuo tutorial. Grazie
www.cambridge-mt.com/ms/mtk/ this is where I got the multitrack from, hopefully it hasn't been removed!
Hello thanks for the video, interesting. Can I ask a question, I currently have a youtuber telling Me that Reason DAWs mixer which is based off of a real SSL 4000 console is nothing more then a image. I'm telling him that they both have identical functions, identical controls but He is telling Me I'm wrong, I think He is being ignorant and arrogant. In your opinion does Reasons Mixer function the same as a real SSL mixer and have the same sound moulding capabilitie?
Hi Holla Sounds, I wasn't aware of reasons mixer, it has been a long time since I used it, early 2000's I would think. I looked it up, The aux sends, Eq and Comp/gate looked to have very similar functions and controls as you find on an SSL, I think it is modelling a 9000 series console. Will it sound like a real SSL, probably not, will it sound similar, probably. Digital Eq's and compressors these days sound very close to their analog originals. Even the old waves SSL channel sounded really close to a real SSL channel EQ. The sound of the console has a lot to do with the transformers the sound runs through, not only in the processing sections but in the line drivers, buss routing sections and the summing. SSL have youtube videos where you can compare the sound of a DAW summing audio compared to their summing boxes which will be even more transparent than a console. It all adds up to a big sound. I would think Reasons mixer is far more than an image, I'm sure they have modeled the different aspects of the console and the sound is close. In my experience of mixing using waves nls which models console summing with channel emulation plugins, directly compared to mixing on the real console, it's about 60% accurate. I do think that a good mix comes from the choices you make over the equipment you use, and so if you like the idea of having a similar layout and function as someone using an SSL console you will probably be lead to making similar decisions in your mix. Daws sound just as good as consoles, I do a lot of listening tests with my students, and regularly they prefer the sound of a DAW, Most people under 25 will think a daw mix sounds better when compared directly!
@@ivanjackman Excellent responce very interesting, Yes there are all sorts of variables in Analog gear aven two identical units will not sound the same. ReasonStudios makes some of the best sounding software sythersizors and effects I have heard and I highly doubt they would say they modelled there mixer off of the SSL 9000 but actually didn't. I suspect ReasonStudios had access to a real SSL 9000 to study it and emulate its sound to the best of there ability. I think the UA-camr is automatically defensive on the suggestion that a software mixer in a £500 DAW is just as capable as his £50.000 mixer he bought or the £150.000 SSL 900. He says He has actually compared the two side by side however I think He would have a invested interest to downplay the capabilities of Reasons mixer.
@@HOLLASOUNDS Well your £500 DAW is just as capable as the real SSL console. The youtuber in question ( I don't know which it is) could easily have tested them side by side, they won't sound the same. And the benefits the real desk gives to the sound in their mind is well worth the cost, so I would think the comments they are making are probably totally true in their point of view. Like I said, some people will prefer the sound of a standard DAW (not even a console modelling one) to a real desk. I mostly mix in pro tools, I think it sounds good and I get good results, the recall is the biggest benefit, but I am in the lucky position of having a Neve console in the studio I work in, and some bands request I mix on it, and when I do, there is something different about it to a DAW, it's quicker, it sounds like a record much faster, and even when you do things that in a DAW would sound terrible, it still sounds like a record, like for example, when mixing in a daw, if your balance is off it sounds like a demo, on a console it still sounds professional. The DAW takes longer to get the mix to the finish point, but it's a lot cheaper to use and you have recall. The console is faster and generally sounds more finished, but the band have to be ok with signing off on decisions as you go, because recall is a nightmare. They are different, both are valid. If you can, book some time on an SSL console and make your mind up after that, you may fall in love with the console, or walk away happy to use Reason, it's defo a personal taste more than a fact that one is better than the other, or even just as good!
so useful thank u
how do you do the channel routing? does it have digital assign or do you have it normalled on the patchbay? looks great
almost half the video was reading the freqs off. not terribly helpful at all. and the q, to my perception, was not changing. the range that Q-clone plugin was covering was changing. from 1k to 2k is a 1000Hz range. from 2k to 4k is a 2000Hz range. the Q will look narrower in this range while it's covering the same amount of frequencies.
Hi Nick, Thanks for the feedback. I think it's more like a third of the video is listing freqs off, the reason for this is that they are not readable on the plugin, knowing the eq points available on an eq is important to some and so i felt it deserved to be mentioned, but point taken. Regarding the Q, I understand your logic, but this is not what happens normally with digital plugin eq's run through Q clone. The q width stays the same on the majority that I have tested. So it is a point worth mentioning. Also you can see that the Q gets narrower moving from 720hz down to 460hz which is the complete opposite to the point you made.
@@ivanjackman . . . Thanks for reading them off . . . ! . . . My Magnifying Glass gets me in the Ballpark . . . ! . . . Mais But . . . I still find myself Guessing . . . ! . . . !?@y@?! . . . ! . . . 🙂 (-;
Great series, thanks so much.
I'm sorry I for got , is the extra sends that you have in this mix is sends of reverb ,plate, shimmer, and compression that isn't being used in the track which is a little confusing to me. Can you help me with that ? sorry about the second comment .
What's confusing is the second room on this track, can you help me with that , Where did it come from. ? Other than that this is great mix to learn from .
Very useful content could you(if time allows) make a video showing how you wired all the gear?
Great video!! Why didn't they just add an insert button for the groups?? Ugh.
Memory location for Hide/Show Tracks !! Thanks a lot
I just bought 4816 yesterday. Did you do the tt patch bays yourself? 'Praps a company can do them up and sell ready to go.
Hi, congrats on the new desk! having a company wire up your patchbays can be very expensive! the TT patchbay I'm using in this desk has Dsub outputs meaning no wiring at all, just purchase Dsub to xlr looms and plug them in.
@@ivanjackman yes. I like those. I don’t have them yet. But it could happen. 😀.
How do you connect the speakers?
Hi, it's best to think of the 24Ai and 24Ao as convertors not soundcards, they just have outputs and inputs, where as a soundcard will have speaker outputs. Basically you need a mixing desk or monitor controller inbetween the MOTU and your speakers.
Is there an analogue console with midi functionalities (analogue/digital) that has the capability to offer analogue signal and midi controller capabilities at once? It probably exists, I'm just starting to look into this. Analogue is cool, but makes recalling sessions much harder, so a hybrid console would be perfect to move cubase/protools faders from the analogue faders. ANyone can suggest console names?
ivan you're a hero thanks so much