ssoreal
ssoreal
  • 1 325
  • 717 878

Відео

Response to Divine prospect: Gentiles and Eschatology 2
Переглядів 1056 місяців тому
I apologize just as in part one i was sick while making the vid which in my case is rare. In this video we examine the belief that gentiles must cling to israel in order to be saved and that their eschatological destiny is to serve israel. This position comes from a misinterpretation and at times an abuse and twisting of old testament prophecies and parts of the book of revelation. For the firs...
Response To Divine Prospect: Gentiles and Eschatology Pt. 1
Переглядів 3346 місяців тому
In this video we examine the belief that gentiles must cling to israel in order to be saved and that their eschatological destiny is to serve israel. This position comes from a misinterpretation and at times an abuse and twisting of old testament prophecies and parts of the book of revelation. For the first time i do a thorough and full walkthrough bible prophecies to demonstrate why this posit...
The Virgin Birth Proven and The Hebrew Dilemma
Переглядів 2257 місяців тому
This is a Not only a response, but a refutation of Divine Prospsect's position against the virgin birth. This was recorded on December 6th and part 1 of a 3 part series. Part 2 will be on The origin of the ebionites. Part 3 will be on THE SINAITIC PALIMPSEST OF THE SYRIAC GOSPELS Music Credit goes to Fantasy meditation youtube channel
AI is no Calvinist
Переглядів 669 місяців тому
Derek Murrell of the irresistible truth channel made a clip that concludes that AI is a calvinist... So in response I asked nearly all AI chatbots the same question, but with NO LIMITED SENTENCES. would AI likely be calvinist, or not? music is not mine. I'm using it for educational purposes ONLY
Matt Salih & Dave Louis dialogue: Does Calvinism lead to atheism? session one
Переглядів 107Рік тому
a year ago, or 2, lol it's 2023 now, I had a tag team debate with 2 calvinists on the topic of calvinism and atheism. this is a continuation of that debate in a slowed down and rich discussion format. I honestly enjoyed this talk very much because it is free from all of the baggage that often comes with some debates. be blessed!
ssoreal and Jermaine Howell Dialogue - Hebrews 7:12 The Law & The Priesthood
Переглядів 197Рік тому
Edited by YouCut:youcutapp.page.link/BestEditor
The Christian Origins of Halloween 2022 FULL EDITION
Переглядів 102Рік тому
The Christian Origins of Halloween are ancient and the pagan claims are both recent and modified.
An interesting discussion with a presbyterian on atonement and being saved
Переглядів 1693 роки тому
An interesting discussion with a presbyterian on atonement and being saved
Brief response to "Cage stage calvinist" and request for dialogue with both...
Переглядів 2173 роки тому
Brief response to "Cage stage calvinist" and request for dialogue with both...
Kdub vs. ssoreal dialogue one: Did God decree all things?
Переглядів 3573 роки тому
Kdub vs. ssoreal dialogue one: Did God decree all things?
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron Shields - CULTURE AND KINGDOM
Переглядів 1663 роки тому
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron Shields - CULTURE AND KINGDOM
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal proves to Pastor Johnson that Jesus REALLY DID rise on sunday #firstfruits
Переглядів 1763 роки тому
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal proves to Pastor Johnson that Jesus REALLY DID rise on sunday #firstfruits
ssoreal vs pastor johnson: 1 timothy 4 does not assume The Dietery Law
Переглядів 783 роки тому
ssoreal vs pastor johnson: 1 timothy 4 does not assume The Dietery Law
ssoreal vs Pastor Johnson: Acts 15 doesnt include dietery law
Переглядів 793 роки тому
ssoreal vs Pastor Johnson: Acts 15 doesnt include dietery law
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron shields: Identity and Textual Criticism
Переглядів 593 роки тому
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron shields: Identity and Textual Criticism
Ron Shields Helps ssoreal prove the name Christian came from The Church!!!
Переглядів 1683 роки тому
Ron Shields Helps ssoreal prove the name Christian came from The Church!!!
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron Shields: Lost Sheep and Identity pt 2
Переглядів 653 роки тому
HIGHLIGHTS: ssoreal vs Ron Shields: Lost Sheep and Identity pt 2
ssoreal vs. Ron Shields Faith & Eschatology: THE RECAP
Переглядів 1953 роки тому
ssoreal vs. Ron Shields Faith & Eschatology: THE RECAP
ssoreal vs. Ron Shields - Faith and Eschatology
Переглядів 4853 роки тому
ssoreal vs. Ron Shields - Faith and Eschatology
ssoreal vs Ron Shields Christian Hebrew Conversations FULL DISCUSSION
Переглядів 3813 роки тому
ssoreal vs Ron Shields Christian Hebrew Conversations FULL DISCUSSION
ssoreal n Pastor Johnson dialogue - Are The Dietery Laws Part Of The New Covenant?
Переглядів 2554 роки тому
ssoreal n Pastor Johnson dialogue - Are The Dietery Laws Part Of The New Covenant?
ssoreal vs Pasor Johnson - Must The Sabbath Be Kept Under The New Covenant?
Переглядів 3214 роки тому
ssoreal vs Pasor Johnson - Must The Sabbath Be Kept Under The New Covenant?
ssoreal vs. Don Byrd - Are The Israelites a Race? Full Discussion
Переглядів 3104 роки тому
ssoreal vs. Don Byrd - Are The Israelites a Race? Full Discussion
ssoreal vs. Don Byrd Preliminary - ARE THE ISRAELITES A RACE?
Переглядів 1464 роки тому
ssoreal vs. Don Byrd Preliminary - ARE THE ISRAELITES A RACE?
ssoreal(Christian) n Pastor Johnson(Hebrew) Dialogue - The Law of God
Переглядів 2044 роки тому
ssoreal(Christian) n Pastor Johnson(Hebrew) Dialogue - The Law of God
Christian Hebrew Dialogue with Pastor Johnson
Переглядів 2254 роки тому
Christian Hebrew Dialogue with Pastor Johnson
ssoreal vs. Lex Vortex Pantheism pt 2 refuted
Переглядів 1944 роки тому
ssoreal vs. Lex Vortex Pantheism pt 2 refuted
ssoreal vs the dark side(black conscious community) pt. 2 PANTHEISM
Переглядів 764 роки тому
ssoreal vs the dark side(black conscious community) pt. 2 PANTHEISM

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @garyhargis4627
    @garyhargis4627 11 годин тому

    Oh how I miss you Mike and the passions you could cut loose.

  • @paulspodsandmarineornament7183

    Mike was really cryptic about his end time beliefs. It was always a mystery what his thoughts were on most things about prophecy, but he did hint a a few things.

  • @JamesDavis-dn3wo
    @JamesDavis-dn3wo 5 днів тому

    This is fascinating. I have learned some things that makes sense out of what made no sense.

  • @GODISTRUTH77
    @GODISTRUTH77 5 днів тому

    Melchizedek was God. Seems pretty clear to me. If the Dead Sea Scrolls says Melchizedek was the God of ruler of the divine council, then no beginning or end, no father or mother, gives Jesus the King of the Priesthood from the line, Melchizedek blesses Abraham, etc.

  • @floyd920
    @floyd920 6 днів тому

    Jesus Christ's Father in heaven or El-Elyon is over all the gods in the Divine Council, including Yahweh. God, El-Elyon is the one Standing in front of the divine council. Not Yahweh. Yahweh will fall like the other gods. This is for his crimes against humanity. We are not fighting against flesh and blood but against spirits in higher places.

  • @TommyStahr
    @TommyStahr 12 днів тому

    I wonder if Baron Trump is a Nephilim? I think Rev 9:11 is talking about his dad. Hmmm 🤔

  • @nealcorbett1149
    @nealcorbett1149 14 днів тому

    KJ Onlyism is just as bad as LXX Onlyism. Limiting yourself to only one textual tradition or translation is like a man who pokes out one of his eyes because he thinks he'll see better.

  • @ChildofGod-q7j
    @ChildofGod-q7j 22 дні тому

    This is happening now w/ all this Christ consciousness today. New Age in 2024 . Trans humanism et.al…. . Wow . Heiser really knew what was coming over at last 10 years ago? i pray God intervenes soon. So Concerned for future generations.

  • @portlandpatriot7784
    @portlandpatriot7784 23 дні тому

    Well, we know the problem, what will we do?

  • @DonauweIIe
    @DonauweIIe 24 дні тому

    Revelation 1. 15 can not mean Jesus is darker than white, because Revelation 1. 14 says *Jesus is white* , else these two Verses would contradict each other. Revelation 1. 14 - 15 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. (KJV) . Strongs Dictionary of the Word "burned" in Revelation 1. 15 in the KJV: πυρόω puroō poo-ro'-o "to kindle, that is, (passively) to be ignited, glow (literally), be refined (by implication), or (figuratively) to be inflamed (with anger, grief, lust): - burn, fiery, be on fire, try." Strongs Concordance of the Word "burned" in Revelation 1. 15 in the KJV: πυρόω puroō Total KJV Occurrences: 6 burn, 2 1Co_7:9, 2Co_11:29 burned, 1 Rev_1:15 fiery, 1 Eph_6:15-16 (2) fire, 1 2Pe_3:12 tried, 1 Rev_3:18 according to the Strongs Dictionary and Strongs Concordance of the KJV, the word "burned" in Revelation1.15 means the present form of the word burn, same as used for example in 1.Cor.7.9 and 2.Cor.11.29. This Video illustrates nicely what Verse 15 means.

  • @ThomasCranmer1959
    @ThomasCranmer1959 28 днів тому

    How do you know that Erasmus was rushed?

  • @pjc7351
    @pjc7351 28 днів тому

    ARTWORK: By The Waters of Babylon by Gebhard Fugel (14 August 1863 - 26 February 1939) German painter specializing in Christian themes. Pslam 137 requires the context of Lamentations and Jeremiah. A blessed Psalm to read after studying those Scriptures.

  • @ProphetGaming77
    @ProphetGaming77 Місяць тому

    I thought Esau was the white man? So Esau was in the garden? Stupid

  • @conniebedard4522
    @conniebedard4522 Місяць тому

    I think the question is who is Israel?

  • @Cryosmind
    @Cryosmind Місяць тому

    And why wouldn't Christ be beautiful? I'm not even white, but I always wanted Christ to be White and Blued eyed. And why wouldn't he rival Lucifer, who was created in perfect beauty?

  • @cliveburrows6071
    @cliveburrows6071 Місяць тому

    Is this really 9hrs long. I have no picture

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal Місяць тому

      @@cliveburrows6071 lol and worth every minute

    • @TyFreeman-e5j
      @TyFreeman-e5j 26 днів тому

      Yup it’s great!

  • @donaldboomer6313
    @donaldboomer6313 Місяць тому

    Head coverings state the man's or father's authority over his wife or daughter putting them under his authority and protection which the angels have to obey which protects their wife or daughter from angels taking advantage of them.

  • @christopherlindsey5490
    @christopherlindsey5490 Місяць тому

    Brass burn bright orange when burned in furnace!!!

  • @fewandchosen-en8mv
    @fewandchosen-en8mv Місяць тому

    14 hour documentary proving that the Israelites were white ua-cam.com/video/f6jXYu_cDXo/v-deo.htmlsi=uPZKLW5u9XvXXeCA

  • @fewandchosen-en8mv
    @fewandchosen-en8mv Місяць тому

    Why would Jeremiah if he was black make a statement like this?🤔 Jeremiah 13:23 23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil. Revelation 1:14-15 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. This passage is talking about the strength of his heel, brass is strong so he had strong feet. The serpent was to bruise his heel. And brass turns white when burned in a furnace and brass is yellow Jesus is depicted as having hair (white like wool.) this isn't talking about the texture, once again this is referring to purity as white is symbolic of purity and a sheeps wool is WHITE, it also says his head was white as snow, it isn't was referring to texture wouldn't his head melt because it's like snow? No because it's symbolic for purity and not texture So he had a strong heel and he was pure.. also brass turns white and yellow in a furnace it doesn't mean he was black with wooly textured hair.

  • @fewandchosen-en8mv
    @fewandchosen-en8mv Місяць тому

    The Bible describes the nazarites was white and RUDDY Adam (אדם) literally means "red", in the Bible it is often translated to (Ruddy.) The name ‘Adam’ can also mean (man) The verses used to describe Easu Jacobs twin brother red is the translated from the Hebrew word ADAM and it's the same word used when translated to RUDDY used to describe King David It is used to describe the first man created in the image of God, the Nazarites, Christ and Easu Lamentations 4:7 Her Nazarites were purer then snow, they were WHITER THAN MILK, they were more (RUDDIE) in body then rubies, their polishing was of Saphir. Song of Solomon 5:10 My beloved is (WHITE AND RUDDY,) the chiefest among ten thousand. 1 Samuel 16:12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was (RUDDY) and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the Lord said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he Revelation 4:3 King James Version 3 And he that sat was to look upon like a ((jasper and a sardine stone:)) and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald. Sardine stone is Red or (RUDDY) and Jasper is commonly red also. We can clearly see by looking at the root Hebrew words used that the Israelites and Christ were described as being white and RUDDY

  • @nicholaskeathley5887
    @nicholaskeathley5887 Місяць тому

    Dr. Heiser is a legend

  • @michaelmagee4318
    @michaelmagee4318 Місяць тому

    I like my NIV and my NKJV Bibles a lot.

  • @freedomtruth3671
    @freedomtruth3671 Місяць тому

    I wonder, is there any messianic Jew out there, that does not support in Israel without a covenant. Do you like always people do.

  • @freedomtruth3671
    @freedomtruth3671 Місяць тому

    I have seen this Michael Brown before something seems off with him, and he is very rude. He seems like he thinks he knows it all, I don’t see any humility in that man. I Pray that he humbles himself

  • @whowillbesaved9580
    @whowillbesaved9580 Місяць тому

    The fake Israelite got his heart broken when he found out that he wouldn't be ruling over White people so he was all like " why would i want to follow a God like that?" 🤣😭

  • @rswilsonart
    @rswilsonart Місяць тому

    Yes, this is correct. Jesus in His transfigured, resurrected, glorified state was simply glowing brightly from head to toe. When brass is being refined in a furnace or in fire, it glows brightly. there is verb action there. brass is a yellowish brown, but the action is its glowing brightly in a furnace. That is all that should be taken from this in Revelation. It is how Jesus looked in his glorified state. Has nothing to do with mentioning wool to prove blackness from being nappy. So what if they tried to use wool to prove hair texture. The Apostle John was told to write what he saw in his vision. with hundreds of sheep worldwide, the only sheep John would have been familiar with, are the sheep native to the Middle east, namely Israel. That sheep is called an Awassi sheep. they have strait fiber hair called carpet wool. It is not (nappy or tightly curled). Google it for photos.

  • @IvelinMinkov-vx4rv
    @IvelinMinkov-vx4rv 2 місяці тому

    Very, very good!

  • @VGK4TRUTH
    @VGK4TRUTH 2 місяці тому

    IUIC is drunk with heresy.

  • @rocksofoffence.righteousam2422
    @rocksofoffence.righteousam2422 2 місяці тому

    It never did 😂😂

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      It did according to Hebrews 9.... and chapter 8

  • @yahuahyahusha364
    @yahuahyahusha364 2 місяці тому

    3:57 not true, that was an textual insertion. The dietary law is still to be kept today.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      It's not because we are under a new covenant.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      Also it was a real teaching because cyrian quoted it in the 200s.

  • @angelharara540
    @angelharara540 2 місяці тому

    Recorded on a brick

  • @DeltaRoots
    @DeltaRoots 2 місяці тому

    Been awhile, may the Most High have favor on you and your family

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      Thank you bro. God bless you and your family all the more

  • @DeltaRoots
    @DeltaRoots 2 місяці тому

    Will *David* be the future *_Governor/Prince_* of Yisrael or Yeshua HaMashiach? What does Scriptures say. Hosea 3:5 Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek YHWH, and *David* their king; and shall fear the Lord and his goodness in the *latter days.* Jeremiah 30:9 But they shall serve YHWH, and *David* their king, whom I will raise up unto them. _(Please read all of chapter 30 for better context)_ Ezekiel 34:23-24 And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, *even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd. 24. And I the Lord will be their God, and my servant David a prince among them; I YHWH have spoken it* .Ezekiel 37:24-25 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them. 25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant *David* shall be their *prince for ever.* Psalm 89:34-35 *My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips. 35 Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David"* Psalm 119:89 *For ever, YHWH, thy word is settled in heaven.* Numbers 23:19 *Elohim is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent:* _hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?_ Seed in Hebrew means *Zera-(Offspring, physical descendant)* Question How can Yeshua come from David Lineage when he never came from seed of a man? Is it logical?

  • @briandykeman4056
    @briandykeman4056 2 місяці тому

    I once cursed God and have lived with it for years . The pain the loneliness the feeling of total rejection has never left. Even though i could research many opinions trying to find a way out of my situation i cant find a way. People's opinions are just people's opinions. When someone says if you fear and live in agony and cant stop thinking of your moment of regret you havent committed it. Is neither biblical or confronting. Only a fearful expectation of judgement. This is a horrible never ending expectation full of dread. If i only could take back a moment of adolescent ignorant childish selfish me first feeling of not being cared about I warn you people this is not a road you want to go down it only goes one way

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      Oh my Lord bro! Listen, I know you can be forgiven because you regret what you have done man.. for real.... did you attribute the work of the Holy Spirit to the work of the devil??

    • @briandykeman4056
      @briandykeman4056 2 місяці тому

      @@ssoreal no I cursed God believing he didnt care about me. Told him to f off twice For me this is serious I only would say is where does the bible say you will not care about it ?

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      @briandykeman4056 The question of whether blasphemy against God constitutes an unforgivable sin has been a longstanding topic of discussion and debate within Christian theology and biblical studies. To approach this question, we must engage with primary sources from the relevant historical period, contextualize them within secondary scholarly literature, and consider the various interpretations and perspectives offered by academic experts. The concept of an unforgivable sin is primarily derived from the Gospel accounts in the New Testament, particularly Matthew 12:31-32 and Mark 3:28-29. In these passages, Jesus warns against blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, stating that it is the only sin that cannot be forgiven. Here is the relevant quote from the Gospel of Mark: "Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins and every slander they utter, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; they are guilty of an eternal sin." (Mark 3:28-29, New International Version) Biblical scholars have offered various interpretations of what constitutes blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Some, like D.A. Carson in his book "The Gospel According to John," argue that it refers to a specific act of rejecting the work of the Holy Spirit in revealing the truth about Jesus, despite being fully aware of the evidence (Carson, 1991, p. 265). Others, such as Craig Keener in his commentary on Matthew, suggest that it is a broader rejection of God's grace and forgiveness (Keener, 1999, p. 363). Regarding the specific act of cursing or insulting God, there is a range of perspectives within biblical scholarship. Some, like John Piper in his book "Desiring God," argue that such acts constitute a form of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and are therefore unforgivable (Piper, 1986, p. 142). However, others, such as N.T. Wright in his commentary on Mark, suggest that while such acts are undoubtedly sinful, they do not necessarily constitute the specific unforgivable sin described by Jesus (Wright, 2004, p. 65). It is important to note that the concept of an unforgivable sin has been a subject of extensive debate and interpretation within Christian theology and biblical studies. The Journal of Biblical Literature, for instance, has published several articles exploring the historical and cultural context of these passages, as well as the linguistic nuances of the Greek terms used. After considering the primary sources, scholarly perspectives, and academic literature, it seems that the most widely accepted interpretation among biblical scholars is that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit refers to an ongoing, conscious rejection of the work of the Holy Spirit in revealing the truth about Jesus, rather than a specific act of cursing or insulting God. While such acts are undoubtedly sinful, they may not necessarily constitute the specific unforgivable sin described in the Gospels. Ultimately, the question of whether a specific act constitutes an unforgivable sin is a complex one, and different Christian traditions and scholars may offer varying perspectives. However, the weight of biblical scholarship suggests that a single act of cursing or insulting God, while sinful, does not necessarily constitute the specific unforgivable sin described in the Gospels, provided that the individual does not persist in a conscious rejection of the work of the Holy Spirit. Bibliography: Carson, D.A. (1991). The Gospel According to John. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. Keener, C.S. (1999). A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. Piper, J. (1986). Desiring God. Multnomah Books. Wright, N.T. (2004). The Gospel According to Mark. In The New Interpreter's Bible Commentary, Vol. VIII. Abingdon Press.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      @briandykeman4056 From the Roman Catholic perspective, the question of whether cursing or insulting God constitutes the unforgivable sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is addressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church: "Therefore whatever is opposed to the spirit of truth and love is opposed to the Holy Spirit. Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, the Lord and giver of life, involves remaining stubbornly in unbelief and resisting the entry of divine truth and life into the soul." (CCC 1033) The Catechism suggests that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit refers to a willful and obstinate rejection of God's truth and mercy, rather than a specific act of insult or cursing. While such acts are gravely sinful, the Catholic Church does not equate them with the unforgivable sin described in the Gospels. From the Eastern Orthodox perspective, the concept of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is closely tied to the concept of despair or losing hope in God's mercy. The Orthodox Study Bible notes on Mark 3:29: "This means that those who have seen the power of God's grace in their lives but have willfully turned from it have severed themselves from God's grace and forgiveness." Orthodox theologians like Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos suggest that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit involves consciously rejecting God's grace and forgiveness, despite witnessing His power and mercy. A single act of cursing or insulting God, while sinful, may not necessarily constitute this unforgivable sin, provided the individual does not persist in a state of unrepentant rejection of God's grace. Both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions emphasize that the unforgivable sin involves a deliberate and ongoing rejection of God's truth, grace, and mercy, rather than a specific act of insult or cursing. While such acts are gravely sinful, they do not necessarily constitute the specific "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" described in the Gospels, according to the interpretations of these two major Christian traditions.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      @briandykeman4056 The relationship between scrupulosity and the fear of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit has been a subject of scholarly inquiry and discussion within the fields of theology, history, and psychology. To understand how scrupulosity can be mistaken for the fear of blasphemy, we must examine primary sources from the relevant historical periods, contextualize them within secondary academic literature, and consider the various perspectives offered by experts in these disciplines. One of the key primary sources on this topic is Martin Luther's writings, particularly his commentary on the book of Galatians, where he addresses the fear of having committed the unforgivable sin. In his commentary, Luther states: "Many people are discouraged because they have feared that they have blasphemed against the Holy Ghost. This sin is committed, not only through outright blasphemy against God's Word and through utter profanity, but also through the mistaken belief that one has committed the unpardonable sin when, in reality, one has not." (Luther's Works, Volume 26, p. 323) Luther's perspective highlights the distinction between the actual sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and the mistaken belief or fear of having committed it, which he saw as a form of unbelief and lack of trust in God's promises. In his book "Scrupulosity: Moral and Psychological Perspectives," the theologian and psychologist William Cencer provides a detailed analysis of the historical and cultural context surrounding scrupulosity. Cencer notes that the fear of blasphemy was particularly prevalent during the late medieval and early modern periods, when the concept of the unforgivable sin was a source of great anxiety for many Christians (Cencer, 2022, p. 37). Cencer argues that this fear was exacerbated by the cultural and religious climate of the time, which emphasized the importance of purity and the avoidance of sin. He cites primary sources such as the writings of St. Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis de Sales, who both addressed the issue of scrupulosity and the need for a balanced approach to sin and forgiveness (Cencer, 2022, pp. 45-48). The Journal of Psychology and Christianity has published several articles exploring the psychological and theological dimensions of scrupulosity, including an article by Thomas Bringle, who examines the relationship between scrupulosity and the fear of blasphemy. Bringle argues that scrupulosity often manifests as an obsessive fear of having committed the unforgivable sin, even in the absence of any actual blasphemous actions (Bringle, 2017, p. 183). In developing an interpretive argument grounded in close examination of evidence, it is important to consider the cultural frameworks, religious worldviews, and historical circumstances surrounding the texts and events discussed. The fear of blasphemy and the concept of the unforgivable sin were deeply rooted in the religious and cultural context of the late medieval and early modern periods, when the avoidance of sin and the pursuit of purity were paramount concerns. Moreover, the textual criticisms and interpretations of biblical passages related to blasphemy against the Holy Spirit played a significant role in shaping the understanding of this concept and its relationship to scrupulosity. As Luther and other theologians grappled with these passages, they sought to distinguish between the actual sin of blasphemy and the mistaken fear or obsession with having committed it. Based on the weight of evidence from primary sources, secondary academic literature, and scholarly perspectives, it appears that scrupulosity can indeed be mistaken for the fear of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. While the actual sin of blasphemy involves a willful and obstinate rejection of God's grace and truth, scrupulosity is characterized by an obsessive fear or belief that one has committed this sin, even in the absence of any actual blasphemous actions or intentions. Bibliography: Bringle, T. (2017). Scrupulosity: An overview and case study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 36(3), 180-189. Cencer, W. (2022). Scrupulosity: Moral and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press. Luther, M. (1963). Luther's Works, Volume 26: Lectures on Galatians, 1535, Chapters 1-4. Concordia Publishing House.

  • @tanishajohnson1917
    @tanishajohnson1917 2 місяці тому

    So whoever posted this video ISN'T AWARE of the DIFFERENCE Between the Words BURNING And BURNT 👍🏾, 🤦🏾‍♀️

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      BINGO!!!! So, please explain to everyone!

    • @DonauweIIe
      @DonauweIIe 24 дні тому

      @@ssoreal see my comment.

  • @lawrencebrewer8769
    @lawrencebrewer8769 2 місяці тому

    Excellent!

  • @anthonya8478
    @anthonya8478 2 місяці тому

    Is there a link to the entire teaching?

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 2 місяці тому

      I forget what it was

    • @anthonya8478
      @anthonya8478 2 місяці тому

      ​@@ssorealI thank you anyway

  • @StarlynsAgency
    @StarlynsAgency 3 місяці тому

    How can you use other ppl content and not get flagged? I ask for myself if I can share this too

  • @SolomonIsrael-es8vy
    @SolomonIsrael-es8vy 3 місяці тому

    All these scriptures are taken out of context to prove your point and you know it. Shame on you…

  • @dariangregory6182
    @dariangregory6182 3 місяці тому

    Lol that's not burned that's burning. My God you people just don't stop with the bs. Yeshua was not white, he was born in Africa before the British renamed it the Middle East so don't even try to go there either. Give it a rest. If you keep denying Yeshua Ha Mashiach because you'd rather him be what you wish he was rather than who he actually was, he will deny you too.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 3 місяці тому

      Jesus was black. No one is denying that. The verse is not speaking about his race, but instead it's speaking about his heavenly form. Hence, the video. John is describing shining coming from Jesus, not his skin...

    • @dariangregory6182
      @dariangregory6182 3 місяці тому

      @@ssoreal stop, cut it out. Yes you are right about Yeshua having a heavenly form that might have shined brightly but don't mistake me for an idiot. That's not what this video is trying to convey.

    • @ssoreal
      @ssoreal 3 місяці тому

      @dariangregory6182 what is this video trying to convey?

    • @dariangregory6182
      @dariangregory6182 3 місяці тому

      ​​​@@ssorealYou know full well the obvious motive behind this video is to deny Yeshua was a Brown skinned Man and insinuate he was "white" The Biblical passage describing Yeshua's feet as brown or black, "as if burned in a furnace" is the reason for the Title of this video. It's about skin and whoever took time to create this did it with either a knowing or unknowing spirit of deception. Some in the comments even tried to help, tried to turn Burn into Burning because they know nothing that looks as if it's been burned in a furnace comes out looking pale.

  • @digginginwithtamara1414
    @digginginwithtamara1414 3 місяці тому

    It goes back to when Satan deceived Adam’s wife, Eve, in the garden because right after that, God made Adam ruler over her, he became her covering because of the fallen angel, Satan. Let me explain: 1 Corinthians 11 says a man (married) should not have his head covered, i.e. he should not allow his wife to take control of praying and prophesying when he is present because God is the head of the man, not the woman; and if he allow it, he dishonors his head, which is Christ. When a (married) woman prays and prophesies without her husband, she is considered uncovered, and dishonors her head, which is her husband, and she is behaving as if she were shaven (as an unmarried woman). But if a woman is unmarried (due to divorce or death of her spouse but yet called a woman because she is no longer a virgin) and she prophesies uncovered, then she must shave her head (to humble herself before God) or else let her be covered, i.e. let her marry. This is not about covering your head with a cloth. It’s about acknowledging the hierarchy God put in place when it comes to spiritual authority (the Word of Power) and protecting the woman (church, body of Christ).

    • @ordonez6248
      @ordonez6248 Місяць тому

      Nice, i like that. It seems really small for a peace of cloth to hold so much power inlight of all revelation of God. So thats why there is some other meaning behind pauls wording

  • @GreyGhost868
    @GreyGhost868 3 місяці тому

    Yeah, i love how they dropped words and added words in the newer addition of Bibles. Here's what the Geneva says. Revelation 1:15 1599 Geneva Bible 15 And his feet like unto fine brass burning as in a furnace: and his voice as the sound of many waters. Brass burning in a furnace is snow-white.

    • @fewandchosen-en8mv
      @fewandchosen-en8mv Місяць тому

      Lamentations 4:7 Her Nazarites were purer then snow, they were whiter then milke, they were more 👉ruddie in body then rubies, their polishing was of Saphir. Song of Solomon 5:10 My beloved is 👉white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand. 1 Samuel 16:12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was 👉ruddy,👈 and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the Lord said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he Why would Jeremiah if he was black make a statement like this?🤔 Jeremiah 13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil. Because Jeremiah was a white and RUDDY Isrealite What is the meaning of ruddy? Ruddy is used to describe something that is reddish - like the color of red hair, tomatoes, or a friend's cheeks on a cold winter's day. Ruddy is commonly used to describe someone's complexion. In this case, it describes a healthy, reddish glow on a Caucasian face

  • @jebatponderworthy
    @jebatponderworthy 3 місяці тому

    Michael, I'll suggest you look again at that word "genizah". A genizah is not simply a hiding place: it is a place where any writing with the Name of God outright, was to be buried, similar to a human grave, when the document was worn out. So we have a very mixed bag in any old genizah. We have practice work by scribe students. We have much deviant material, which even though it was considered deviant, still it had the Name of God full in writing, so it was not to be burned. Much modern scholarship seems to ignore this, but it is a very important part of the whole, because it means that regardless of age and preservation, there was a hierarchy of considered worth in any genizah, that hierarchy now being almost completely lost, because the administrators of the genizah not only left little besides it, but changed significantly over time.

    • @dhat1607
      @dhat1607 28 днів тому

      Michael Heiser passed away in 2023.

  • @drdannegoita
    @drdannegoita 3 місяці тому

    Great video!!!

  • @twongreen9968
    @twongreen9968 3 місяці тому

    They both false

  • @robowilly51
    @robowilly51 3 місяці тому

    Thanks so much for your hard work bringing this to light. It answers questions I've had for many years.

  • @swanbitcoin2355
    @swanbitcoin2355 3 місяці тому

    Judaiazer vs a person that understands the Bible

  • @theyrekrnations8990
    @theyrekrnations8990 3 місяці тому

    here's another .Lamentations 4:7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:

    • @idkiguess69
      @idkiguess69 Місяць тому

      There’s an entire 14 hour documentary on how the Israelites are really white people Very informative

    • @theyrekrnations8990
      @theyrekrnations8990 Місяць тому

      @@idkiguess69 Where is it That I can see it? U can also go to James wickstrom.

  • @spinetingler-007
    @spinetingler-007 3 місяці тому

    Jesus is, was, and will always be 100 percent white.

    • @DonauweIIe
      @DonauweIIe 24 дні тому

      yes, because Revelation 1. 14 says so: "His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;" (KJV)