Відео

@@lowa1436 Zum einen kann ich Englisch und zum anderen, wenn du meinst, dass ich allgemein kein Deutsch rede dann irrst du dich, ansonsten ja, du hast Recht, im Video rede ich nicht Deutsch. Nicht weil ich es nicht kann, sondern weil mein Kanal auf Englisch ist. Daumen nach unten werden auf UA-cam sowieso nicht mehr angezeigt, sie sind eher dazu da um deinen eigenen Algorithmus einzupendeln, aber wenn du dich dabei besser fühlst dann gerne, gebe mir einen Daumen nach unten :) Dir noch einen schönen Tag!

Uhhhhh he’s SPEAKING VERY CLEAN PROPER ENGLISH

Give it some time, if you do it a couple of hours each day you will become pretty good in around a year (as long as you actually understand what is being said at least a little bit; if you have no idea what people are saying you should go back to learning some vocabulary and grammar and then try again)

@@elias_ebner yo entiendo varias cosas pero por los acentos cambia mucho pero en cuanto a lo escrito mas el audio si entiendo que mas debo agregar a escuchar leer y ver

This is interesting. Your social anxiety aside, not being able to tell what others think of us and constantly thinking about it is a problem that a lot of people struggle with. Sometimes me included. Making a video about it could be a good idea, you did in fact give me a bit of an idea. I'll think about it and might expand on this in a future video. Thank you for sharing your story! I'm always interested in hearing what other people have been through and some glimpses of their life stories. Wish you all the best, if you want to talk some more you can totally message me on X, I always respond to DMs on there.

Thank you very much! I see this channel as a way of sharing my thoughts and my journey (in different areas of my life) and I am always pleased to see people actually interested in what I have to say.

Ay, my man, thank you. It's these kinds of comments that motivate me a lot. I can't lie, I have been procrastinating recording videos lately. I am not as motivated, but that's to be expected. I am trying to slowly incorporate positive habits into my life. I am currently working on waking up early. This principle of taking action has served me well lately and I thought I would share it. Thank you for the nice comment, wish you all the best.

What are seks?

@@elias_ebner Sorry I not understanding the question?

I don't understand the meaning of the word "seks"

@@elias_ebner Agh I understand

so what does it mean?

What do you do?

@@elias_ebner Brother! I am the owner of a digital marketing agency" I have audited your channel. Your channel is having some technical issues due to which your videos are not getting views and your channel subscribers are not increasing. I will basically fix your channel issues so that your videos will have view bars. And your The channel is growing fast

The thing is I never said anything that is right wing, I simply said that Kamala wasn't fact-checked and that Trump wasn't treated the same way, which is true if you objectively look at it, regardless if you are right wing or left wing.

@@elias_ebner no but your other comments about abortion are straight out of a Republican talking point guide

Your take is interesting, but I believe that when you are reporting (and this is an important rule of proper journaling) you shouldn't have ANY bias, because then you aren't "reporting" per definition, but more so you are "commenting" on the matter.

​@@elias_ebnerIf your idea of "reporting" is just Trump said A, Harris said B, without any analysis or basic fact checking then wtf would even be the point? It'd be like watching the weather channel. Reporters have a responsibility to get to the truth and present it to viewers while also imparting why that truth is important. That may lead to biased reporting but that's perfectly fine because here's a hint: Trump is an insane maniac and any "lies" she told are infinitesimal compared to the damage he would do if elected again.

@@elias_ebner Reporting "just the facts" is idiotic. Most viewers aren't well informed of facts OR of how to analyze them. Journalists have a duty to inform people of the events going on and why they're important and where they fit into the overall context. They additionally need to push for "biased" policies that creates outcomes that helps people and doesn't harm them.

Ayy, thanks, I really appreciate that. Hopefully just making videos will one day pay off, it's just that with this philosophy of "uncut and unedited" videos it's hard to grow on this platform...

That’s a good insight

You're right, it's very frustrating though, talking with someone who isn't willing to listen to what you have to say. In theory, that's the whole point of talking.

@@elias_ebner well you have to ask yourself if you yourself is even listening. Most times debates are to inflate one's ego, what we should be trying to be more involved in are conversations. Put the intention on trying to understand the other, rather than trying to be right.

It's a good way of looking at it. I always try to see debates as an "opportunity to seek truth", but to be honest, I sometimes catch myself "trying to be right"... That leads to very unhealthy conversations that lead nowhere.

What you always do in debate is not to change believe of your opponent, your job is to change opinion of crowd

To be frank, there are videos outlining and listing all the factually inaccurate things she said. I will tell you one example of something inaccurate that wasn't fact-checked to show you that what I said is true, but if you want more examples, you can find plenty online. She said that no late-stage abortions are happening, but 8 or 9 states allow abortion up to the 9th month and it's actually a very prevalent phenomenon in those states. She also said that in no state is it legal to abort after birth, but it actually happens in certain edge cases where the baby is born, and then later they decide what to do with it. Also, they came at him with the "bloodbath" hoax once again. These are all things that should've been clarified by a fact-check live. Also, some of the fact-checks against Trump were actually inaccurate, for example when they said that there is no reported case of immigrants eating pets (police files are proving that it did happen, even though it's rare, but saying that it never happened is simply false). I hope this paints a better picture of the situation.

@@elias_ebner you made a whole video about it and you don’t have one response? That’s weak AF bro

Did you read it? I gave like three examples lmao

@@elias_ebner read what bro?

my reply

I also learned a bit of French a couple months ago, but without bragging, it was a little bit too easy because I'm a native Italian speaker, and French shares like 90% of its vocabulary with Italian. I wanted a bit more of a challenge so I went back to Chinese.

Thank you very much man!

Thank you very much! It really depends on what type of content you watch. I started watching very smart people and university professors give speeches. If people get stuck at watching basic stuff they're never going to improve their vocabulary. Wish you the best, thanks for commenting!

what's up with that?

I'm really sorry to hear that. The more "repetitive" tasks (especially those highly related to pattern recognition) are more likely to be replaced. To be honest you're the first person that I've heard was replaced by AI. Do you feel like telling me more about it?

@@elias_ebner You pretty much nailed it. I would look through transactions for patterns. (Repetitive) I would review around 200 transactions a day, and catch a certain percentage of fraud. The machine can look at 10,000 or more an hour, and is more accurate at catching fraud. It's a good thing for society, just sucks for me right now. lol. Thieves have started using their own AI to counter preventitive AI, it's getting interesting. Leading up to it, you will hear a lot of the term, "repurposing employees." The company will say they will just move you to another business unit. But that's a small percent if at all.

@@elias_ebner Weird, I wrote a response, but it looks like it was deleted. Strange.

@@bochafish Oh that's strange, i remember reading your response where you said that I was right about the "repetitive" jobs. I even hearted the comment. Maybe there was some automatic filtering system that wrongly deleted your comment.

@@bochafish Oh this is strange, it shows your reply in UA-cam Studio but not under my video. Maybe it's buggy or something?

lol my barber charges me 22 Euros (Around $25) for a cut.

Insulin regulates your blood sugar level. When you it your food plays a minimal role. There is no such thing as a "fat storage mode". It literally is about how much energy you take in vs how much you consume, it's a basic law of thermodynamics. Calories in and out is the main thing here. If you eat a lot and don't exercise, you gain weight. If you eat very little and exercise a lot, you will lose weight (assuming your body functions normally). You're partially right, in that the video is superficial, but far from inaccurate (which I have already stated in the description). I don't know where you got your information from, it would intrigue me to be honest.

There are plenry of sources. Try "The Obesity Code" book of Dr. Jason Fung. Anyway, oir body is very complex. It's not working so simplisticly. First, the types of calories you're eating makes a lot of difference, because we eat food, not calories. And our body reacts differently. Just try doing a 1500 kcal/day diet eating 1500kcal of pure sugar, vs 1500kcal diet of pure meat, for example. The weight outcome will be hugely different even if your caloric intake is exactly the same, and that's because our metabolism reacts differently to different substances. With sugars (and carbohydrates) our insulin level rises and the body is highly prone to store a huge amount of that into fat. Plus, we you exercise more, your not burning fat right away. First, your body try to use mainly glucose, then try to access mainly glycogen reservoirs from the liver. That's because this is a quicker way to obtain energy. Burning fat is a "slow" process that needs to be triggeres by a complex hormonal response. We all burn a small amount of fat daily, sure, but if you're obese or overweight and you want to burn more fat, you have to give your body the right instructions. Just lowering calories (or doing more exercise) is not enough. Calories must be taken into account, but the overall mechanism is much more xomolex than "eat less, move more", and that's way for some people losing weight is soooo difficult. Your assumption may become more consistent for young healthy people, without metabolic imbalances, but becomes highly suoerficial if applied to overweight/obese people, for example

You're definitely right about the glucose and glycogen, I didn't mention that in the video (but as I said, I left out some nuances). When it comes to the meat vs sugar, on one hand, sugar are empty calories so yes, it definitely won't help, because the nutritional values for sugar are terrible, but on the other hand, everything eventually gets converted to Acetyl-CoA, so in the end, the actual energy you get it's... well... just energy. There are different "kinds" of energy, yes, (like kinetic, potential, chemical, electrical and whatever) but in the end, they're all different categories for the same exact thing. One could argue that high Temperature, which is still a very energetic state for molecule, is nothing more than kinetic energy, just the atoms moving rapidly, or that chemical energy is nothing more than potential energy, but that's besides the point. In the end, energy is just energy that is stored and used by our body in different ways, so while the nutritional values themselves may facilitate certain processes by giving us the substances to aid them, the most important point still remains the sheer quantity of calories ingested. I will also give you credit for saying that my assumption is more consistent for young and healthy people (which is why I also said a little disclaimer in the video which excludes people with certain medical conditions from my advice). What you also have to understand, is that I myself am a young and (personally I like to believe) healthy person, so my experience will of course be more biased in that regard, because as soon as I started to cut my calories I have always seen a reduction to my weight proportional to the calorie deficit in less than a week. So for sure, the "better" your body functions (where better basically means "more efficiently" or "exactly the way it was intended to function), of course the more directly you can apply my advice. On the other hand, I'm just a dude on the internet sharing my experience, so don't blindly believe everything I say, I like that you challenge what I say.

😂😂

I actually agree with this, there is a high chance that so-called "unskilled workers" (without wanting to offend anyone) are likely to be replaced soon. I'm also suspired that UA-cam is recommending this so much lol

I am sorry to tell you but you are terribly wrong. I'm assuming you don't have any background in any of those fields. The "art" generated by AI is not even comparable with human-made art. Let's not even talk about the music or the videos. But thank you, you gave me a great video idea where I could go more into depth regarding this topic. Have a great day!

Do you watch AI generated videos for your entertainment? Do you listen to AI generated music in your free time? Seriously.

That's true, but this video is all about the fact that there will come a moment when the two will meet. But yes, until you're alive, this is definitely correct.

That's true. Indie game developers need to be good at so many skills, it's actually insane. I tried once but got stuck when it came to making the art for the game, as I wasn't very practical with pixel art but insisted on trying that type of art style.

I was debating if it's useful or not. I'm still not sure if I should do it. I don't think it makes much of a difference anyway.