Відео

😂😂

Megalomaniac Alert

🔥🔥🔥

I hate it when the weeks turn to days..

😂😂😂

The work is figuring out if all of the stakeholders have the grit and determination to succeed. Most of the time, it's just one guy who does and a bunch of other clowns getting in his way.

It is crazy how many different words there are for a single thing in Construction

Liability is a myth. I hit rewind 5 times on that.

next time do the Q&A at the end . not cool in the middle jaja at all

He doesn't know history. Why did people have to leave the farms to work in factories. Why are so few employed in farming today. Advances do remove employment places.

I believe when it comes to reaching the "back of the house" in AEC firms data infrastructure and pipelines are the most important. As a practicing engineer I see a lot of chaos in data flows at the production level that if addressed could lead to significant use of AI and huge gains in productivity.

Spot on discussion - worth making the time to listen

Y ya 😅😅😅? 😅z gxgx5W16?z😅1♡?%1

In our conversation, Danielle Dy Buncio mentions VIATechnik's predictive insights tool, but we posted the wrong URL. The correct URL to get you to the Precogs page is: www.viatechnik.com/precogs

🤔 Promo_SM

jr83k

Developing a culture of innovation is difficult if the tools, processes, and methodologies don't change. While folks may be innovative individuals, they won't be able to bring cultural change about in their orgs, if their tools, processes, evaluation criteria, etc. and ways of working don't change as well. You end up getting sucked back into the old way of doing it because day to day you work in the framework your org has. The Built world is one of low-profit margins, the margins protected by doing things the same way. Not a formula for innovation and change. Leadership required comes from the top. There's a job open for a leader who wants to be the first to innovate - lots of candidates who want to be second.

Great presentation Maks! The technology you walked us through is amazing! I have a few questions to confirm my understanding, 1) Building concepts are generated based on the following inputs: Building requirements, contexts, and DNA, correct? 2) Each concept that is generated meets these criteria with varying degrees, correct? 3) What determines the selection of the final concept to be executed? How do you filter the top concepts? 4) How do you categorize and classify the requirements? Thank you,

Steve - nailed it. The numbers are tremendous, so is the opportunity. The Built industry is extremely slow to change, even with numbers like this. Seems none of the established players want to be first, everyone is ready to be second. The leadership position is open...

Very relatable discussion. A lot of tools all racing to solve the same simple non-problems and not so many tools focusing on wicked/real problems in my view. Another issue I see is the over-dependence on vendors relying on architects to promote their tools even when not suited to them. Take Autodesk Tandem and Forma as examples - they are still targeting architects despite the fact they are clearly tools for owners and developers. The hard angle is to build and market to the real users, the low effort angle is to try to get architects hyped to market to the real users for them.

Want to see my strat😊

"Promosm"

The essence of all beautiful art, all great art, is gratitude. -Friedrich Nietzsche

How can we use digital twin technology during construction, not after the construction?

What are your thoughts of having a background color? Or is it better to have true white space?

Thanks for posting

well explained. Be blessed

✨ p̳r̳o̳m̳o̳s̳m̳

this was amazing thank you

Thank you for sharing this!

good basic info thanks

Yes

I'm ALL for ALL of this. I just had a question MAINLY about EV/Electronics vehicles. Do we have ENOUGH copper on earth, to pull this off? This is ANOTHER subject, that ties back into ALL of this, it MAY be a LITTLE more political, BUT what isnt, now days, EVERYONE seems to be making EVERYTHING political now days. The definition for infrastructure has never changed,JUST, because PART of the government/congress, doesn't understand what infrastructure is, doesn't mean the definition has changed, its just an issue with comprehension. This is the definition for infrastructure: The basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) needed for the operation of a society or enterprise. This could ALSO be considered infrastructure/charging stations, for EV/Electric Vehicles, are needed, solar/solar panels/wind turbines/water trurbines, are ALSO infrastructure/NEEDED, to power ALL of this/replace oil/gasoline/non-renewable energy, ALSO job positions, NEED to be filled, in these fields/areas too,analogy, if the city/county doesn't have the budget, for workers, to fix the roads/electric grid,thats a problem,same with ALL of the other stuff to come,MOST LIKELY censors on the road/solar to power ALL of this,for self driving vehicles/electric vehicles,battery back ups, for red lights/signs, for at night/when ever solars not available/ not good enough/if its to cloudy/dark, also.LESS lights,will have to be used as four way stops,because lights are out,from something that happened miles and miles away, as long as a sever,in the line/a local problem isn't detected, battery backups,can continue to be used and be charged by solar, honestly it made no sense back in the day,for lights to have to go out,it DEFINITELY makes no sense now. These things NEED to be done/budgeted in, we CAN'T make the same mistakes Trump made/cut off supplies from China/Japan/create tariffs and then not have a plan/ not have warehouses/manufacturing plants/distribution centers, open and established, in the US/not have an infrastructure in place/an alternative for supply. We NEED incentives/tax deductions,for owning an electric vehicle/having solar/sealing up you're house/blowing in insulation/spray foaming/insulating/replacing/getting energy efficient windows/ upgrading toilets, to use less water, really what we need, is Incandescent/halogens and CFLs, to be pulled off the shelfs/only offer LEDs,give companies HUGE incentives, to make their products energy efficient/Energy Star Rated, appliances like refrigerators,freezers,tvs,Washer machines,dryers,Mini Splits/HVAC,FANs, ALSO businesses should ALSO get these tax write offs, also A LOT of this should be written into building code,ALSO recycling shouldn't be a chore/have some type of sorting system/require trash companies to sort/recycle trash,with sorter machines/it should DEFINITELY be automated/efficient. SOME of this is already being done,BUT we NEED to keep things going in the right direction. The reason this matters, the obvious reason, we only have a certain amount of oil,BUT as long as were alive,the sun is here/can be utilized, along with wind and water turbines. ALSO less energy, would be being used/needed/it would DEFINITELY save people money,BUT ALSO the infrastructure, MAY not be the strongest, in the beginning, it will take time, for ALL of this to be built and get real efficient/the less power we have to produce, the better and MAYBE in the beginning, we can just off set, SOME of this/use less efficient methods/non-renewable methods,alongside the more efficient options,such as solar/wind turbines,battery back ups and so on, then work our way into, ONLY using the more practical options,once the infrastructure is built/established. Things are FINALLY changing, people don't realize how much though,not yet anyway,A LOT of jobs are going to be automated/not exist for humans, SOON/SOME of these positions/jobs, have ALREADY disappeared/no longer exist. The other things A LOT of people aren't realizing, is, we live in a digital world/convenience and low price, is key, when it comes to business/brick and mortar is dying/door dash/deliveries/UPS/USPS/Fedex/Amazon/Walmart/automated distribution centers are the future/self driving vehicles,electric and solar/renewable energy/we NEED to think about what we use,MEANING,IF we decide to use something that is not renewable, it NEEDS to have reusability/it needs to have a great/HUGE return,examples,Helium3,graphine/graphite,thorium/fusion,I'm not saying we SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T use these, I'm just saying they give a good return, for the amount used. We DEFINITELY NEED to be looking to the future/colonizing other planets,is ALSO SOMETHING we DEFINITELY NEED be thinking about ALSO. ALSO more space stations/MAYBE even manufacturing/assembling space ships/satellites, in space/it would save a ton of money/be A LOT more practical, to manufacture, in space vs sending fully manufactured items from earth, up to space stations. Anyway we need to be thinking long-term/we don't need to think like/become the dinosaurs. The issue is,even though the government wants to ignore it,its DEFINITELY going to effect,EVERYONE,these dinosaurs,MAY be dead,BUT,like I've said, we don't want to become the dinosaurs, meaning IF this happens, nothing we've ever done/accomplished, really matters/no one, will live on, in even history books/PDFs/no one will know who George Washington is,Albert Einstein,Tesla,Benjamin Franklin,Thomas Edison,Karl Benz/Henry Ford,Bill Gates,Charles Babbage,Federico Faggin,Ted Hoff,Percy Spencer/Robert Hall,Jacob Schaffer/James King/Alva Fisher,Henry Altorfer, Willis Carrier and so on/no one will live on/I guess John F Kennedy,said it best, " We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.". Technically in the future, space stations,will ALSO be infrastructure,because, we will NEED them,to get supplies to different planets/back to earth/build space ships in them/deploy satellites and so on,I hope we are just doing these things to colonize additional planets and we haven't used all of our resources/made to many more terrible decisions. Anyway I understand this DEFINITELY sounds crazy,BUT I guarantee,for the future of human survival, these are the next steps, we NEED to take. PLUS, by doing these revolutionary things,we learn a lot more/improve things/grow scientifically/get better technology/get better medicines/medical break throughs and so on,plus who knows,we MAY meet someone out there/thats a slippery slope,BUT it has to be done,meaning,HOPEFULLY they are friendly. Anyway point being is,we NEED to do these things,for the future of earth and humans.

By reflecting away 30% of the ISR the atmospheric albedo cools the earth much like that reflective panel behind a car's windshield. For the greenhouse effect to perform as advertised "extra" energy must radiate upwards from the surface. Because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules such ideal BB upwelling "extra" energy does not exist. Backed by an experimental demonstration, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K There is no "extra" energy for the GHGs to "trap" and "back" radiate and no greenhouse warming. With no greenhouse effect what CO2 does or does not do, where it comes from or where it goes and its climate sensitivity value becomes moot. Equally moot are temperatures, ice caps, glaciers, polar bears, sea levels, hurricanes, nuclear power, solar minimums, CH4, ….

Hi would love to talk Modular - I am from Canada and I am really not understanding your thoughts that Canada is "ahead" in the modular world. My email is steven@haylestrom.com

How can we contact you guys! Pramesh from Singapore

Informative presentation.