Відео

I72!

round tails/thumb tails have a little more hold through turns. It could allow it to hold a little better in some bigger waves as well. It depends on preference. i personally got this is a square tail for some more slide/release riding it as a thruster.

Im looking to use it in slight oh waves cant wait thanks 😊🤙🏼

I72 with john john techflex larges

@@ginjaturtles id say the inferno 72 is the ultimate chest -head high weapon. its so fun and fast. Phantom is a good option too. Both boards can hold a little better in bigger waves with techflex fins. jjf large- I72 AM2 techflex large- phantom inferno 72 wide point center (back footed surfer) phantom wide point forward (front footed surfer) hope this helps. both super sick daily drivers

@@jakewetzel3186 hell yeah super helpful thank you!!!

@@Ronny439 for me it was a good option with waves with punch. its more of a shortboard with a wider tail. the phantom by pyzel or the inferno 72 had some good speed and liveliness for chest-head high waves.

@@Asator66 i am 190 , 6’1. that ghost i had in this video was 6’0 29.9 liters. it was a fun board for head high - DOH+ i now have a 6’2 x 19.63 x 2.69 32.7L i would say i prefer the bigger ghost because i like to ride it as a step up when the waves are hollow, big, and when there is a lot of current. the extra 2 liters honestly doesnt feel too different as the tail is very thin and responsive. it still turns like a smaller board but the extra foam gives me a little more confidence when its big. and has a longer rail line. you can literally push this board as hard as your legs can push. still love the ghost when its firing. paddles great into bigger waves. We just had a hurricane swell here in california, and i reached for the ghost and had a blast. no brainer for me when the waves are epic.

@jakewetzel3186 Appreciate the feedback bro! I'm 5'10 170lbs, from what you said it sounds like a 6'0 would be a good option for me for when the waves are good here in indo, or possibly the 5'11. I think the ocean is different here with not much current as in Hawaii and the waves are maybe not so open so the lesser volume option may be better suited. But I've spent so much time thinking about it I probably just need to stop overthinking it haha

Was wondering the same

i have reviews coming on the twin turbo, disco cheater, and cheat code

i think it really depends on your preference. I like the red tiger for its simple feel and predictability and it did seem to grovel a bit better. The inferno was extremly fast and loose and has more un-predictability which i prefer nowadays moreso begause it livens up california waves. If its any indicator when i just went to Tavarua, i brought my pyzel phantom and pyzel ghost. If I didn't have the phantom i would have brought the red tiger for its precision surfing and hold on better waves/reef breaks.

@@jakewetzel3186 such a complete answer! Thanks a lot!

ya i have been riding my inferno more and more as time has passed. the subdriver 2.0 was a great board and but honestly didn't really find a sure spot in my quiver. I liked the driver 2.0 in mediocre/good waves and when it was smaller i ride my grovellers. IMO i think there are more lively boards in that range that i have stuck to. The inferno 72 lights up with the right fins. (sharpeye fins or Futures F8) it was a night and day difference between raked fins for me (AM template) was a little drawn out for the board. Id like to try the john john fins in the inferno as well. But to answer your question my favorite daily drivers for socal have been the inferno 72 or pyzel phantom for 3'+ waves in socal.

@@jakewetzel3186 Thanks man! Just ordered one, gonna pick up and take it out this weekend. Fin recommendations really helpful, will prob just get the Sharpeye fins if I don't like the ones I have (Surf N Show Raked)

@@jakewetzel3186 Thanks man! Just picked up the inferno72 this weekend, pumped to try it out. I met Marcio incidentally at the Sharpeye store, very cool guy. He recommended always use large fins and could even use a medium fin as trailer

@@dr.spengler1863 ya! enjoy it and lmk what you think

i found that the sharpeye fins have a lot of drive and hold but have good release. They were a game changer in this board. It came off the bottom well and was snappy through turns. (best of both worlds). I have yet to try the f8 but they were recommended by sharpeye. So i could see how those went good.

Awesome reply, thanks

awesome reply, i couldn't have said it any better. After getting used to it. I also think this board is a dream!

the shadow i rode in hawaii definitely had hold in bigger waves head high+ although to me it felt a little dead if the waves were even the slightest bit mushy. The inferno feels more snappy and lively than the shadow, but when it becomes powerful, its hard to slow the inferno down for critical turns in barreling waves

@@jakewetzel3186 Hey Jake, sick surfing How would you compare it to the red tiger? You said a lot the inferno 72 needs a bowly wave whereas Ive heard the red tiger prefers less sloped waves. Would you agree and do you know any other differences between the two?

I just got a shadow and haven't tried it yet. I've ridden a lot of Pyzels and like their forward bias. You can draw off your front foot and forward weighting. I'm neutral to forward foot biased so the Inferno was a rude awakening. It made me use my back foot more and do better tight wraps with speed. I got better using it but it's very much a backfooted surfers dream. Like Jake said its snappy or really squirrely or lively. But also when waves get round or fast or you have to make sections it's kind of gets tricky to ride.

@@Nathan-fo4vq ya the inferno and red tiger are both great boards. Both wide point center and are snappy in the pocket. The inferno 72 and red tiger are pretty similar in a lot of ways just with a different feeling due to the rockers. The red tiger did carry speed through flat sections a little better and had a more predictable shortboard feeling. (like you were never going to catch rail or have the board do something weird). The inferno 72 is more lively and has a ton of speed when the wave offers it (more than the red tiger). It can do tighter arcs in my experience riding it, and with the right fins (sharpeye fins/futures f8/John Johns) it a dream board in the right conditions. chest high+ and lined up so you can get some speed. So really it comes down to your preference. Do you want a predictable board that surfs great in the pocket and can handle a little bigger waves overhead+ (red tiger)? Or Do you want a more responsive lively board with a ton of speed that is a little more unpredictable and tops out around the head high to slightly overhead mark?

@@jakewetzel3186 Sweet as, thanks for helping out and giving good insights into these boards

or white tiger