Відео

UnderBVRunaway, I feel as though William is very weirdly characterized regardless of whether Midnight Motorist takes place before or after The Big Bite and if you believe WillPlush. In Midnight Motorist, Dave locking his door is enough to set William off so much that he was going to get violent with them (and probably still did). In FNAF 4, Crying Child is locked in his room (and in Parts and Service) by Michael yet William had very little to say about it. "What did he do this time? He locked you in your room again." is all he said which read that he was exasperated by Michael's antics despite *locking doors in his house* got him violently angry in MM. And these antics are a.....common thing with them. I hope this doesn't come off as rude or mean; however, his sensitive son locking his door (despite hating being in locked in rooms in FNAF 4) was enough to anger Will badly yet he had nothing to say.....nothing at all.....to his troublemaker son who was (or will be) the cause of a horrific event in his family due to his pranks? I.....really have to doubt that, I'm sorry. And then there's Michael's character if MM takes place before FNAF 4 which is......oof. They are already dealing with an abusive father (though seemingly only Crying Child from what is shown) yet Michael decided to make his life more of a living hell in FNAF 4 with everything he did? That's......honestly disgusting of Michael and makes it harder to root for him especially if he's supposed to be a penitent character. 3:42 Not only have I used the movie as evidence that Elizabeth is the youngest of the Aftons, a UA-cam comment a while back made me aware that The Mangle's FNAF AR takes place in a room with a crib (which is hidden in shadows and only illuminated by flashes of lightning implying it has sognficance) and Elizabeth had a Mangle toy in her room while the animatronic is known to be an attraction for toddlers in FNAF 2. Also, Elizabeth *NEVER BRINGS UP HER DEAD BROTHER* despite them looking roughly the same age when we get to see her. That will never not be weird to me.

No way! Our endings of our timelines for UCN are almost identical! Here’s what I believe After the Fnaf6 fire, Cassidy’s soul stays alive to make sure that Afton stays dead. She creates a torment of 50 characters for to attack William. Once he’s dead, he stays dead. But Andrew keeps William alive and Cassidy keeps her soul alive for to convince Andrew to rest his soul and let Afton die because he’s no longer a threat. Old Man Consequences tells Cassidy to leave the demon to his demons, implying William and Andrew, and to rest her own soul. Cassidy listens to Old Man Consequences and drowns herself in the lake. In the game files, drowning in the lake is called ‘Your own happiest day.’ So I think this implies that Cassidy drowning herself in the lake is her own personal happiest day. Everyone gets there happiest day except for Andrew and Afton because of Andrews vengeance and Aftons lust for blood. After Cassidy rests her soul, Fazbear Frights and the epilogues happen. And I also believe Michael didn’t die in the Fnaf6 fire and escaped for to make sure that the souls moved on and to make sure that Fazbear Entertainment didn’t revive itself You’re a really underrated channel and you have one of the best timelines that I have seen so far!

Could you do a video on the bite of 87?

Midnight motorist would help explain the order. If Mike is the couch person which is heavily implied by the books and visual similarities then the runaway is the crying child which would place Charlie’s death as the first. William was working on the funtimes at the time when bite victim was alive because we see his office monitoring the crying child in his bedroom. (yes, CC is who we play as in FNaF 4) I’m not however saying Elizabeth died before him but actually that the sister location bunker was being worked on. Charlie being first would tie to how William even discovered remnant (tear tracks on the puppet) and prove that Elizabeth died before the MCI. I believe Bite Victim died second because in FNaF 4 there is a girl who is visually similar to Elizabeth playing in the backyard which belongs to the Afton house, why would a random kid be playing there if it wasn’t his sister? On top of that she is among the few who doesn’t care about the party because she’ll be there anyways unlike the pigtail girl and she is playing with toys (the “empty” room isn’t really empty)

I got one the dirt pile is Dave's grave after the bite mike draws a gave in red pin with a flower vase and we see the same vase in fnaf 4 that is dave's grave. mike is the runaway or rory from dittophobia.

I still think Mrs. Afton is "in" FNAF4 --- If the cutscenes are Dave Afton looping in the memory of his last week of life and Mike Afton is experiencing the gameplay sections, then I think on both "sides" we are seeing the "unspoken" impact of Mrs. Afton. What I mean is that Mike, as a 12 or 13 year old boy is relentlessly taking it out on his little bother; bullying him constantly while their father is basically absent (at work) and is not stopping it. Dave is always crying, always aware that he is the target and unable to escape --- Because his mother is not there to mediate between the two children and is not there to comfort Dave; to take the constant stream of tears away. Meanwhile Mike remembers/dreams about strange nights of hiding from monsters. As he does, Mike sees a pill bottle, an IV stand and a vase of Tulips. Tulips are associated with Mothers, Motherhood (presented to mothers in the hospital), Spring, Mother's Day and the coming of Easter (Rebirth). Mike is remembering how his mother isn't here; his mother isn't here to stop the fear experiments. She isn't here because she got sick, it got progressively worse and then she was "gone". I think the key is not "why" Mrs. Afton isn't in the story, I think the point is her impact in being absence; her LACK of presents in the narrative. There is a hole in the story; there is a family with a bad father and no mother there to "save" the children. In Sister Location Mike watches a soap opera where the mother is "normal" and the father is a "monster". Clara is not literally Mrs. Afton, but she is a here to convey one thing; Mike states in the Logbook that he relates to her. Mike relates to how Clara perceives the situation, not how Vlad sees it. Mike always related to his mother, not his father. Mrs. Afton leaves the narrative, while Mike is still a child, and so he takes it out on his younger sibling with no one to step in and stop it. Mike bullies, and bullies until it goes too far; Mike is sorry, but half the reason he is sorry is that he realizes the irony; out of mis-directed anger and resentment, Mike has lost another family member. If we want to go even deeper, one could even say that the Vampire motif could add onto it; Vampires kill humans and Vlad is a vampire... The baby, the son, who looks just like him, is also a vampire. Perhaps Mike feels like he is a killer; he killed his little brother and so he's "no better" then his father. Perhaps the store of Mike's redemption is rooted in him snapping out of assuming he is a killer because his father is a killer; realizing at some point how it was an accident and Dave did not blame him; Mike blamed himself.

So in conclusion, maybe? I love the concert storyline for these games 😂

scott told us about the box

My Theory is It is "Something" that can touch the Flipside (death) and the real world. There are only a few people that can do that in this story. Golden Freddy,The Puppet, Michael, Afton and possibly Baby. Henry might have been able to find a way but we can only guess. Since we only hear from him once in the whole story. In New FNAF we assume GlitchTrap can contact anyone with the Vanny Mask Implant. (Cassie and Vanessa)

Fair enough interpretation, but for another possible clue as to what Midnight Motorist is, I'd recommend looking at the numbers on the dice in the Midnight Motor in FLAF

Maybe that's the one retcon Scott made, making William yellow instead of purple, lol

Actually, Coppelia is meant to go to school every day for 5 days in a row (one of which, she skips because Ralph said she could while half asleep). So 1993 still works, but they seem to be paying on Friday instead of Thursday (Saturday with overtime). So 1993 or 1999 fit with this alone. And due to Coppelia's age and the Disney trademark, I believe 1999 is the year that fits best.

I think this answers "Daves" remember what you saw.. He saw Yupple Guy kill that person and bury them. MOST LIKELY Dressed as SpringTrap. Thats why Dave never put 2+2 Together and he was scared of the Animatronics.. and NOT his father. It would also give a reason for William to Withdraw from being around his son, Dave. He felt guilty.

8:04 honestly, I really like the way you phrased this, it honestly makes me want to run through every existing fnaf theory, even ones i dont believe, and see if I can make a version of it that makes sense to me

if the mound is ms afton then maybe 'that place' that dave is running off to his her grave ?

my version of Midnight Motorist has William as the yellow guy, Michael to be the runaway, the mound to be Crying Child’s grave, and the couch person could be anyone (Mrs Afton, etc I don’t care) and it is after Charlie’s murder

What if Elizabeth was the runaway? I know that it says he has ran off to that place again but think about it from a narrative perspective. We know from her death that she is drawn to the animatronics, baby killing her in the games, and in the movie she's very attatched to freddy. If she see's animatronics outside her window what is she gonna do? Ever piece of info about her points to the idea that she'll follow them, she's drawn to them. Can't stay away which is how she died in the first place. The mound can still be Mrs Afton as she has no significance to any of the games currently, and Dave could have already been bit. Going off the information was have we know that Dave is scared of the animatronics going as far as to hid under the table at freddys to avoid them. If Dave is the runaway explain the footprints, cause Dave certainly wouldn't follow one Freddy/GB out of his window. Those are just my thoughts, if one letter was different it would make complete sense but what do you guys think?

I’ve really been getting into your content lately and there’s something about this video that really cemented you as a great creator You seem chill

Dude doesn’t even have a desk fan 🗿

she midnight on my motorist till our child escapes

My personal theory is that Elizabeth and Mrs. Afton are at the Party at Fredbears. If charlie was there/ or if it even was her Party, it would make sense that Elizabeth would be invited since William and Henry are friends so its possible Elizabeth and Charlie were friends aswell.

Absolutely have chills and fanboying out, didn't expect to appear a video haha This is what the community should be like, simple lighthearted discussion about a video game, hope to see more of these in the future!

New sub, loved your videos!

you know, something that just SNAPPED in my mind when i saw kawafernande's comment - is that not only Charlie's death would solve what Crying Child saw and why is he so afraid of animatronics specifically, but also solve WILLIAM'S MOTIVE behind Charlie's death. It was not out of jealosy for Henry or whatever unconfirmed bs. He did it to escalate his experiments. Just think about it - you are a psychopath who's experimenting on some fear bs in the dark while trying to keep your public image intact, and your experiments on your own son has not born any fruit yet. And the child is getting more out of control - running off to the pizzeria you and your friend are running more and more often("He ran off to that place AGAIN"). What can you do to tame him, make him more obidient, and possibly give him a new fear that you can manipulate for your experiments? Take away his friend. The kid would run to that place again, and right behind there would be a dead body of his best friend - conviniently, your business-partner's daughter, the partner that alwayss manages to be better than you. William kills two birds with one stone - gets out his anger on Henry, and causes Dave to fear the animatronics. A carefully calculated move. Except, he did not think of one thing. The death of Charlie caused so much agony, that it manifested something unseen before - a Shadow of Dave's favorite animatronic. This is how Shadow Freddy was born. This time Dave ran off not on his own, but he was lured into the back alley by the shadowy Fredbear figure. I can't really think of any ways how William could have found out about Shadow Freddy's existance, but it could have easily been also the catalyst for his remnant experimentation. Sherlock Holmes, out.

That's a great theory! I think it might be the best way to solve Sister location's timeline. The writing and editing of the video is also very well made, congratulations

I have a theory for the footprints and broken glass windows, golden freddy is a 3 toed character who in Fnaf 2 uses his head to jump scare you, what if golden Freddy’s head comes flying through the window which explains why there’s no broken window shards outside which helps whoever the runaway is escape

firstly just to tell you how to pronounce my name it's 'Lachlan mac-in-dough' don't worry about it a lot of people get it wrong the first time, secondly on the Elizebeth being born after the big bite that wasn't what I was proposing what I was proposing was that she was still young at the time around 2-4 years old at the time of the big bite and they were getting her into her own room being the reason why there would be a girls room in the crying child's/Daves home to me.

Crazy thought. What are the chances that mm takes place after the dci. In FLAF, the midnight motor car has a dice with the numbers being 87.

When I saw your pfp I thought it was some kinda of endo skeleton custom render….I now realize that I was very wrong

I might be the only one who’s still holding air for MikeRunaway, but I could see why people are all coming back to BVRunaway after Flaf: It’s that it was the first conclusion that people had in mind back when the minigame was introduced in FFPS in 2017. I feel like the interpretation of AftonMM is the real debate, and my opinion is that this is the new “MikeTrap vs. WillTrap” scenario where going into with Midnight Motorist; because it’s more about who’s the runaway and the effect of the overall story. I feel like when people say it’s BV who’s the runaway and Mike is the Couch potato, I feel like something more than a simple detail to top it off. Look, I’ve watched Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules a lot back then (Cuz it’s my favorite Wimpy Kid movie ever). And from the top of my head, it’s ignoring the prequel to it, meaning the first movie adds context to it. Now look at the Wimpy Kid movies from 1 to 2, Rodrick was a total jerk to Greg in the first movie, then the sequel switch’s that up to flesh out Rodrick as a real character to connect to. My argument is that Mike is a jerk from the start, but then get to the aftermath and we’re shown that he feels sorrow and starts redeeming himself in the end. My problem with “same color and same detail like watching TV” bothers me because there’s multiple characters who share the same characteristics like Couch Potato and it’s possible that it could anyone. And my issue with BVRunaway is that. . . The prologue and where the story goes when it’s in a game that’s supposed to “tie up loose ends.” It’s more of me questioning “Why the family is in a bad relationship?”, “Why is Mike defending his brother when William is capable of abusing him as well?”, “What’s the point of connecting the Puppet minigame to Midnight Motorist under this theory?”, And mostly “Why choose the Aftons to tie up loose ends?” It’s a bit problematic because I really don’t see a prologue of the Aftons under this interpretation, but the sequel tends to be FNAF and the creation of the Nightmare Chambers- I want to be brutally honest, I think the whole point of Midnight Motorist is to analyze how William got into the obsession with Agony, his reason for building the Nightmare Chambers, the point of why Michael is targeted as the FNAF 4 dreamer (and using the Logbook can solve other holes from previous things since it’s “building up a story”), and mainly what really happened to the Aftons after the Bite of 83. When it comes to a story, I feel like it needs a backstory to explain its importance and why it needs to happen, so that it can build up to the point where the story itself makes sense. And to me, I believe that Michael is the Runaway for this type of narrative. It’s like how George Lucas created the Prequel Trilogy to fit within the Original Trilogy. And with the whole “MikeTrap vs. WillTrap” thing, I was saying that the first conclusion sparked the popularity of the theory, but time flies by and that there’s a different conclusion where it makes sense even though you have to wait for literal confirmation to understand that we actually had the idea of what’s the story, but we were close to what it was because we had a conclusion that Scott didn’t plan in the first place- Or that I’m completely wrong and I was spitballing on why I struggle with Scott’s handling of the lore!!! I got a little excited to see if you’ll end up reading my comments in this video, but I really don’t care if it’s supposed to. I thought it’ll be nice to see people’s reactions. Although, it’s nice to know you a bit. I really don’t want to know much because I don’t like being a creep according to a random user. But for sure, I love this video and highly enjoyed it. Thanks for reading

did you ever consider Gibi’s theory that this mini game is just an mci runaway? At first i thought it was silly because of the purple car but i was convinced pretty fast. basically the other two mini games are explicitly about mci kids and clarifiying details of how they were killed, and this mini game being about another event entirely instead of answering questions only brings up more which would be counter intuitive of scott’s intention. In this the footprints is just william (which lines up with a ucn where one of the kills is indicated by william going to a kids house and breaking their window), and the dad lines up with a drunk father in one of the books whose kid runs away because of his abusiveness, and he gets blamed for williams crime (the purple car) Later that night is in reference to midnight motorist (after drunk driving at midnight for some time) and the mound is only to indicate when in the timeline it takes place by showing william breaking ground on what looks like the outline of a house

Hey!! I like your videos and theories, I follow you on Twitter! Can we be friends?

Hmm it kinda makes sence taht cisrcus baby was earlier in the beginig, probably the game was made to fill in the gap Scot didnt take in azount in the first games, but how, for some reason there is no grave for elisabeth.

I don't like the idea of Michael being the couch person and I don't like the idea of Dave being the Runaway because one the couch person is named a man sitting and watching TV in the game files. And not a teenager sitting watching TV and why would the crying one try to leave? he's a scaredy cat it doesn't fit his character why would a character that's is too scared to defend himself what tried to disobey his father?

I really do think the person in the chair is a babysitter, hence their generic appearance. While not one to one, the FNAF movie does bring to mind the possibility of a babysitter, considering max and the crappy aunt are both babysitting in that movie. Add onto that a child being lured away by an animatronic that seems to just randomly appear/disappear, and you have a pretty good idea of it being something like the movie, where Cassidy as golden freddy lures a child outside. That would, however, mean that Charlie dies after the mci, or at least after Cassidy. While i personally don't like that timeline for narrative reasons, I also think that it makes the most sense if we're trying to create a concrete timeline that isn't contradicted by anything to my knowledge besides Henry's "a wound first inflicted on me" line, which is problematic for a lot of timelines but could also refer to something other than Charlie's death. Here's my thoughts on a puppet-last timeline: The graves in HW2 show the order of deaths, with Dave not represented- when he dies is unimportant, since most serial killers don't need an 'inciting incident' to make them kill, but it could have been before the MCI. Afton's MO could be getting a whole lot of 'liquid courage' at jrs and then committing those heinous acts- either intentionally steeling his mind for what he's about to do (which some killers are known to do), or maybe he's a violent drunk (perhaps his violence got him kicked out of jrs?). After kids go missing, Henry builds the security puppet to keep an eye on customers' kids. With the security puppet active, William can't lure kids to the back room, so instead opportunistically kills Charlie. Then midnight motorist happens. Possible 'wound first inflicted on me' could be william abducting the games equivalent of Sam. Maybe he even raised him as his own as Dave.

Haha thanks for the shout-out man, I'm also happy i was able to convince you as well! God bless.