Відео

Thanks, I will try to do that net time.

Thanks!

Thanks! I will try to make more example videos after Superbooth.

Yes, if you don't have anything connected to the D input. The circuit is very fast so I decided on 7kHz when it's running sort of in free mode. Otherwise it would let noise through, it is a way of suppressing noise in its function. BUT if you want the update frequency of detection to be higher you can do that by connecting an oscillator to the D input. That way the oscillator will determine the max switching frequency, it can be set to be way above 20kHz. You can in the same way connect an LFO or a gate signal to D and set the frequency to be as low as you want. The actual detection of a zero difference event is super fast, in the uS range and will be a very clean detection. The frequency we are talking about here is just the maximum amount of times per second it is allowed to do a new detection. I hope this makes sense :-)

@@danwahlbeck2621 Thanks for that long and precise answer.

Thanks! I try to make the patches in my videos as simple as possible to show the power of what you can do with a very simple system. In this example I only use one channel in the Switch. A way to expand the patch could be to switch in other signals with the remaining 3 switch channels, both LFOs or audiorate.

@@danwahlbeck2621 I have even much more complex patches in mind. But I am still lacking some modules to realize that.

I use my own DC1 filters that I recently released as a DIY product.

Yes, it is that simple.

Thanks Nik! I like doing little exercises like this. Practicing patching is so relaxing.

Thanks June. Feels good to know that it comes to some use.

Thanks Boele!

Ha ha! Thanks! I know what you mean. I got a second Rings yesterday and spent the whole evening wavesplicing combinations of Rings patches. I was supposed to do something else 🙂

@@danwahlbeck2621 that's the tagline for the Zero 2, "I was supposed to do something else"

The main reason is cost. I can get 100 pcs of these at 40€. Never had any problems with them. The ones I use are not shielded, they are twisted pair. No problems there either. Thin and flexible, easy to get out of the way. The only thing to keep in mind with TRS is if you go from one case to another and the module used has the plastic connectors like on Doepfer. Then you need just one mono cable to get the ground reference right, all the rest can be TRS.

@@danwahlbeck2621 That's kind of why I was asking. Going from case to case I've been noticing slight pitch changes as I plug more cables from, in this example, sequencer to oscillator. I did some research and connecting the case with a few more patch cables seems to fix the issue. I believe ground reference is the problem. So those are TRS cables but not wired like TRS cables?

@@Nick-kb6jd They are standard TRS cables. If they hadn't been standard they would have been more expensive. If you go between normal modules the ring cable is not used. If you go between Doepfer type modules the ring cable is used as ground reference, so this also work between cases too. The only time when a mono cable is needed is between cases when you go between a Doepfer to a normal module as you need the longer sleeve in the mono cable to connect between the ring and sleeve.

Oh, that can be a long discussion. It depends on the application and availability. For switches on my Switch module I use DG419 but on my Wavefolder for switching in the different types of distortion I did a discrete design with JFETs. It all comes down to what you want the function to be and what the surrounding circuits need. So I don't really have a good general answer.

If you would have a trigger that only switches when they are equal and have slopes in the same direction there would be cases when it never will trigger. Like if you like to switch between a clean signal and the same signal after a LP filter. Because of the phase delay through the filter. The slope detection would have to be disabled in that case.

You can sort of see it that way. But D-latch can only sampel and hold logical high or low signals.

@@danwahlbeck2621 I've been meaning to suggest that instead of a D latch, you could also have a newer version with a S&H input. Not sure if your time delay/inversion would also work with that, but it could be interesting if what is currently the D input would output not just a T or F but the actual voltage level of the incoming signal. A small addition that would make it applicable to even more patches.

@@konstantine8054 You can't have just an analog S&H for this function. The D latch is needed. It needs to be a logic level function for this to work. You can use the Zero2 to control a S&H module if you want that function. I am not sure it would add that much extra value to have that function built in to the module too. I can't of the top of my head see any really interesting use cases unfortunately.

Thanks! When I came up with this I couldn't understand why I couldn't find anyone else doing it. Using it for audiorate wave-splicing can be very interesting. I will post a few application specific videos soon.

Thanks! Glad you liked it. Switches are useful in so many ways.

@@danwahlbeck2621 i guess you just showed the 2 in 1 out functionality here, not the opposite direction, or did I miss that part?

@@NickHchaos Yes that's right. You can run signals the other way too with one in and 2 out.

Hej Andrew!

Thanks Robin. Here and in the workshop where I build my stuff is where I spend a lot of my time, for obvious reasons :-)

Thanks!

Ja det är samma Dan :-) Ett av många områden där jag ändrat mig. Tycker fortfarande det är korkat med alla kablar på framsidan men det råkar vara så att det konstigt nog är det system som passar mig bäst, i alla fall just nu ;-)

Thanks! Was looking at your channel. You have quite a few good ones.

@@danwahlbeck2621 Thanks for watching. How are you liking Angle Grinder? I'm curious about the Schlappi modules. Are you find it to be musical or mainly for noises?

@@precarious333music I really like the Angle Grinder. You can do a lot more than noises with it in filter mode and use the CV and Inject inputs to add color that doesn't have to go to the extreme if you don't want to. It is capable of lots of musical sounds. Eric Schlappi likes noise so that is what is in his demos :-) The Interstellar Radio on the other hand is much harder to control. I find it inspiring and have spent many hours with it. But it is more a noise module according to me. It still haven't made it's way in to any of my recordings.

@@danwahlbeck2621 Cool, that was the impression I was getting from what I've seen others do with it. Such an odd design I'd imagine it pushes you to think differently from when using a more standard filter. Thanks for the feedback.

Was about to just show adding color on the transients of an envelope. Like at 7.30 in the video. Was aiming for a 3 min video but got carried away a bit and it ended up being 7 times longer :-) Will at some point try to do a cut down version.

Thanks! Been spending some time looking through your insect pictures now. Impressive work!

Thanks Dan. I have a playlist of my modular videos I keep unlisted so not to confuse my subsrcibers. Really need to start a second channel just for music. ua-cam.com/play/PL0v3DQIDJrYH4fvQsoPYD9IJptfZoChpN.html I've been looking into wavefolders for a while now. I have Intelijell uFold II. I'm not a fan of heavily folded waves. I love the more subtle folding on my Buchla 261e. Your module is very musically pleasing even into audio modulation and the range of control is very impressive. Love that you can rhythmically automate it. I will definitely pick one up once I have money again.