Відео

bro thank uu !! also wondering whe you was talking bout nightclub photography what other lens would you reccomend for canon as I have recently just bought the Canon EOS 6D Mark II

The RF lenses are to me about as appealing as COVID-19.

"Does it have the same colors as the 5D Classic? Does it produce the same soft image as the 5D Classic? Is it better than the 5D Classic in terms of final image quality? I'm not interested in AF, video, ISO... just the image and colors. I have the 5D Classic and plan to buy the 5D Mark III. I also have a 6D, which I plan to sell because it doesn't come close to the 5D Classic. All the best! :)"

Would you choose this lens over the Sigma 28-105mm?

I hear you. I see so many people loving their Fuji cameras. I just expanded my Sony cameras APSC and full frame and am wondering why. The love isn’t there. 😢

Right on. I'm about to try out the voigtlander 18mm pancake for fuji. I have fujis 27mm pancake and while I find the inage quality ok enough, I go for a pancake I want low key, poasibly indoors and somewhere I am right in the middle of the action and don't want to impose. I'm thinking the much wider 18mm will be a better pairing for the small size of a pancake.

I have a copy of the lens sitting by me. It’s incredibly small for the speed and aperture.

I would rather have this over a GoPro. I mean, the GoPro is great and all, but it's ultra-small size means it's more susceptible to getting lost more easily, so I'm rolling back to compact cameras as an alternative for when I don't want to use a cheap, very low quality, action camera.

Saludos, tengo un problema, cuando uso flash no puedo visualizar la exposición en tiempo real, alguien sabe como puedo solucionarlo? Tengo la lumix s5II

It has a fatal flaw. The aperture is stepped. You CAN NOT get a smooth aperture transition while recording video. The "clickless" aperture ring may as well not even be a thing.

What do you think of the mk2 version?

F2 being soft is a huge plus. I've started to not like that all the Fuji lenses are so damn sharp. I got the Voigtlander 35 f1.2 and sold my XF35 f1.4. It's quite amusing that so many people stress out over perfect lense IQ and then put glimmerglass or blackmist filters on to make them more "film like" and softer. Only lenses I want tack sharp are my wildlife and super wide landscape lenses. Everything in between does not need to be razor sharp, in fact it's a minus

Have you recorded 4k60 on the V30 card? Does it stop recording or is the v30 enough? I ordered an s5iix for $2200, got the 20-60 and 50mm with it.

Great video, subscribed! I just got Godox Lux Junior and based on tests it's great but recycle very slowly at full power. Thank you 😊

BS pentax vintage or nothing1!

I think the stiff focus throw is beneficial for macro lenses as to not mess up your focusing in very closeup shots

All of Fujinon F/2.0 lenses are pretty good, as they also cover all the focal lengths for primes.

Wonderful images.

There is so much reason to pick the 5D III, It is one of the last Canon DSLRs that support Magic Lantern that is modern, I never picked it up when it was new as I was quite literally 5 years old but shot on two 5D III and image quality is still up there today, Autofocus on 5D III is fine, for 90% of work DSLR older AutoFocus does the trick, Honestly was an unexpected surprise how good they are coming from Sony Mirrorless, they don't make Cameras like they used to, the flippy and OLED Screens make them so much more delicate, I appreciated its Tank like body and by far has photo battery life better than a majority of Mirrorless Cameras, it has no Battery Anxiety and its something thats not really been matched, I think the DSLR platform is harder for beginners and the weight for alot of people who are less able bodied than me is definitely a point of contention, overall great video and a Camera that has come and go from my life when my Sony was just not having it!

That pop-out diffuser on the large speedlight at 4:52 is the wide angle diffuser that, when deployed, automatically sets your flash's zoom to 14mm (basically, an ultra wide spread of light); you can't change the zoom until you retract that diffuser. At least that's how it was on the original Canon 600 EX-RT. i had mine for 10 years and it only just gave up the ghost a few months ago. Loved that speedlight to death. It was a real workhorse. One of the best speedlights ever created.

Bought this for my Sony A7iii. It’s awesome.

I am currently on an aps-c but looking for an upgrade. Now that I found your video. Ngl some of the images you showcased are stunning quality. Now am actually confused about full frame vs crop haha. Because some of the pros you mentioned actually make sense.

Para mi, el que la cámara sean tan pesada es un punto a favor

Someone lied to you. It's got old, dried up grease, that's why it's stiff. It's not supposed to be. If you want a real micro lens, check out the Nikon 105 2.8 AF micro. They're about $100 USD used. A real 1:1 micro and it's fantastic.

What is considered a high shutter count on one of these?

17:25 I use Leica SFC1 & Canon 270EXII wich works on the Leica as well as other w/ standard hot shoe & or X utilize automatic thyristor as well. Or M I share Leica & Canon mini flash across Leica Nikon Canon in standard Center pin hot shoe or to radio trigger or lens sync Nikon & Metz work awesome but just not as compact

1:42 Except that that’s exactly what I wanted for. Otherwise, I have Metz Nikon Canon for full automatic thyristor & M & wireless radio

Great video! For the s5ii for wedding photography which flash and settings would you recommend for the reception? I won't be using burst too much. Thanks!

I'm so close to buying this camera but I can't believe it doesn't include a multiple exposure mode. The S5 did, but it was apparently dropped for this camera and the S5iiX. It's a major downer for me.

I recently switched from an X-H2 to the S5IIX and I have been shocked at the results. My whole time on UA-cam has been with a Fuji camera and I’ve struggled. I nailed the video nearly right out of the box with the Panasonic. And I’ve been so surprised by the photos that I sold my X-T5 to buy lenses for the S5IIX. It has been eye opening to say the least.

Imo not usable at f2, so why bother having an F2 lens???

Your perspective on the 28mm was pretty darn GREAT, sir. I am debating on whether my next prime is going to be a 28mm, 35mm, or 40mm. You have given me food for thought now AND most especially, because of your sample images. You are a very gifted photographer, my brother! 💯 📸 GREAT vid!! 😎💪🙏🏽

Years ago, I bought a nice used one, and it has always had "buttery smooth" focusing. Dunno how I got so lucky, but I'm happy. Oh, it seems to render colors better than my other lenses.

Good video. Having bought and sold this lens twice, I’d have to rather go for good condition second hand Fuji 23 f2 or 35 f2 for image quality. When I looked at the results from this lens, my first thoughts weren’t, ‘not bad for the price’, but ‘I wish I’d used a better quality lens’.

Actually, it's the price which so high that you have no choice but to treat the camera special to justify your purchase.

been shooting with the m8 since 2010. The m9 is great, but i ended up going with the m262. files still have that leica look but the extra iso for me was worth the extra cost.

before the m11 comes along, I do use my m9p quite a bit because of that clean look you get from the sensor when the lighting is good. But since I got my m11, the lighter weight and overall better sensor (just needs a bit more work in the post) made me not picking up my m9 for a whole year. That being said, I do think my m10p and md262 (essentially m240) did not manage to triumph the m9. Espeically the m10, even though the body is fantastic, the color simply isn't there.

It’s so special because the shutter sounds like it’s in pain, it’s heavy like a brick and very much outdated. IQ is still very good though.

The only thing holding me back from buying it right now are problems with shooting with strobes.

switched from 6D TO XH1

Bought the M9 in 2024, because I was bored by the perfection of my Sony A1. Shooting the M9 is definitely more fun and the colors right out of camera are lovely - much closer to the analog film experience. But to be honest, the results of the A1 are technically so much better and in dynamic sceneries or at really low light, where you get lost with the M9, nothing can currently beat the A1 (ok, may be the A1 Mk2). So I would recommend the M9 only for the joy of taking the photo, if you can afford it beside another, more up-to-date camera.

What makes it special? Corrosion?

How much did u pay the girl to be your girl for the day

Thanks for the comparison. I think in the future it would be better to be a bit more careful with comparing like for like, particularly stuff like checking the focus point with manual focusing and also comparing depth of field/bokeh at the same focal length, as that makes a massive difference. The image detail comparison wasn't very convincing tbh. In terms of bokeh: a full frame f/2 50mm lens would have a similar DoF as an f/1.4 33mm APS-C lens with the same framing/distance to subject. And the full frame cameras seem to have about 2 stops better ISO performance. So I guess you balance this out with the size of the cameras and lenses for equivalent DoF and the required shutter speed/ISO. If you could get a small FF body and an f/2 equivalent lens that is also small, it seems like it would beat APS-C by 1 stop (ignoring sensor resolution etc.) because of the ISO performance compensating. You also have stuff like zooms for wildlife photography being decent in good light when on cropped sensors (smaller cropped sensor, smaller lenses, etc).

Had both this and the Voigtlander 35mm f1.5. Kept the latter. The Zeiss sold.. bad construction quality for Zeiss, way too much focus shift, etc.

I have an M9 and several other Leica cameras. Whenever people look at my photos, they always seem to like, or notice the colours of the M9 more so than the other Digital Leicas I have.

Some nice photos. Re M9 these have retained as much value as they have not just because of having Leica on them but because if you can afford it these are very low risk. If it breaks Leica will sell you a new camera at a very, very significant discount. If you are buying this because it's "cheap" that's like buying an old BMW. Good luck to you. Re color it's just Kodak's interpretation, it's not hard to LUT into it if you like it with a more modern body but to each their own. IMO this camera is the body equivalent of the 35mm v4. Folks can take that statement however they like.

Do you find the 50f1 AF superior to even the mk2 56 1.2 ?

I’m a late comer to the whole Canon DSLR ecosystem. I love the output of the Canon 5D Classic paired with my Olympus OM Zuiko lenses and Super Takumar M42 lenses. Have had the Mark II off the back of the Classic, and while amazing, I just prefer the simplicity of the Classic more and result of the 12mp sensor is more that enough. Suits the older manual lenses more in my humble opinion. Just purchased the Nikon D700 to pair with the 5D, and that is an amazing camera. It’s beefier and chunkier than the 5D, and the low light performance is a bit better. The whole menu system on the 5D Classic is so nice and simple to use which I love. The Nikon D700 menu is too convoluted to me. I would urge anyone to consider the older DSLRs if starting out. You can pick them up cheap, and the things that made them great and flagship cameras all them years ago, still make them great today.