Відео

I've got a Renown wheel now, don't worry

Ethan Mohoney nicceee 👌

Sorry, the video was meant for Z32 owners. I'll make sure the next one has my cat in it, just for you.

You are so STUPID. On every Z32 page. Here, a gift: The 1994 - 1999 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 was always easily faster than the Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo (my 1992 Z Twin Turbo lost to more 1G VR4s than I won by FAR). In 94 Mitsubishi gave the next gen all that it needed to beat anything but a Supra Twin Turbo from a roll. In Japan the MR model debuted in 1994, weighing only *67* lbs lighter due to deletion of Tuneable Exhaust, Active Aero and suspension settings. Funny - the 2G Stealth Twin Turbo weighed a svelte 3600 LBS and the 2G VR-4 weighed 3680-3740 LBS. ua-cam.com/video/ukVsqR66ldE/v-deo.html - *GTO MR ran 12.888 to 400m, barely beating out the R33 Skyline GTR* *Oh and it's debut where it beats the R32 Skyline GTR and losing over a mile* - ua-cam.com/video/fwps3TVcJMM/v-deo.html - it went 13.3 to 400m. *The Z32, called the FAIRLADY Z there, went to 400m in 14.75 even with the same HP/TQ numbers listed here* - ua-cam.com/video/EWd70mdVfao/v-deo.html On the 276 rule - www.caranddriver.com/news/a15131963/japan-dumps-276-hp-pact-car-news/ ua-cam.com/video/kBTwc8h-cnI/v-deo.html - MotorWeek, 1994 *1994 3000GT VR4, 0 - 60 in 4.9 and the quarter mile in 13.5@103mph* *MW couldn't get the Z faster than 13.7@103, so 3-4 car lengths ahead at the same trap speed.* www.motortrend.com/news/virtual-velocity/ MotorTrend, 1995 *300ZX Twin Turbo: 13.9@102.0 mph* *3000GT VR4: 13.5@101.6 mph* The Z is 4-6 car lengths away and moving .4s faster isn't passing up that much ET difference. This is what usually happens stock to stock. ua-cam.com/video/vFEYkgOZdC4/v-deo.html - *Stock 1999 3000GT VR4, quarter mile of 13.2@102.7* This is a thoroughly stock car. It took him over a month to get the launch down. www.300zx.cl/ga/300zx/images/rtt10.jpg - Road and Track, 1994 *300ZX Twin Turbo, 14.4@99.7 mph* *3000GT VR4, 14.2@99.0 mph* Another instance of the VR4 being too far ahead for the Z to catch up to with under a single mph. It lost by 2 SECONDS around a track to the: VR4 www.300zx.cl/ga/300zx/images/rtt07.jpg Seems the Z32 isn't all it's shaped up to be, it lost to a 250HP Corvette by a SECOND around a track *When all was said and done, the Cor­vette turned laps in the one-minute 38-second range, at an average speed of 64 mph, while the Nissan was almost a second per lap slower. "No big deal," you're saying? On the contrary. It is a big deal in a two-hour race. Far more important, the Corvette-with its hip-hugging seats, smooth power delivery, and neutral handling-is far easier to drive for long peri­ods at those speeds. To put the Cor­vette's racetrack prowess into per­spective, remember that the big V-8 produces 50 fewer horsepower than the twin-turbo terror* (LMAO) www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a15112003/1991-chevrolet-corvette-z51-fx3-vs-nissan-300zx-archived-comparison-test/

@@v-dubsup9738 Its not about seconds mate. Its about havingvthe best mix of attributes and winning prestigious awards such as being on the Car and Drivers top 10 for 7 yrs straight among numerous other awards too long to mention.. Has your mitsu won any awards, even one ? Especially for its butt ugly interior! Also, a 1996 test by motorweek found the 300zx tt to be the quickest compared to supra , rx 7 and the all conquering 3000gt. ua-cam.com/video/9oJHwyFoenc/v-deo.html

@@v-dubsup9738 lol he knocked you on your ass

With this car it's just easy

Click "show more" above, those are the main upgrades right now.