Відео

@@mastixmastix Thanks for the feedback.

@@Titannz213 Please email our support. You can find the email at fylm.ai/contact/

@@gnomistphoto The increased saturation is correct however the effect is enhanced by the fact that Adobe RGB input transform is for a scene referred image debayered into Adobe RGB such as developing a raw file in fylm.ai and selecting Adobe RGB target (we no longer offer that option and we debayer into ACES linear by default). As your PNG image is display referred Adobe RGB you see change in exposure and saturation. Long story short, for it to stay “unchanged” we need to add an input which is a reverse of Adobe RGB output. Can’t say when we implement this but it’s on our to-do list. In the meantime you can work with Adobe RGB images and manually adjust exposure or use sRGB. You can always make manual adjustments later in PS, or you can install OCIO plugin for PS and then use a LUT that doesn’t bake input and output so is ACEScct. If later is too confusing, just stick to the first part of our answer :-) Thanks for your kind words.

@@sleeping_ghxst Thanks for your support. We’ll be uploading such video soon. If you would want any sort of assistance feel free to reach out to our support.

fylm.ai is a color managed application. When you load an image in fylm.ai, the app needs to know what kind of color space does that image have and which sort of monitor you are using so that image can be displayed correctly and so that it can internally be transformed correctly into the color space fylm.ai uses internally. Let's assume you're a still photographer and you load a JPG image in fylm.ai. Most likely the correct input (aka the color space of the image) will be sRGB and the output space (your monitor) will be also most likely sRGB as that's the most common monitor out there. When you select these, you will not see any difference visually but internally the app makes all sorts of calculations so that everything works as expected for that specific image. If, on the other hand you shoot video, and for example you used a Sony camera and your image is S-Log3 then that's the input you should use. The output remains the same according to the monitor you have. Feel free to ask anything else.

@@fylmai can I have in-depth tutorial on how to use it

@@onuohapaschal4058 I suggest you start with this video ua-cam.com/video/pstW_Hisu64/v-deo.html and contact our support with any additional questions.

Please check this 10 minute tutorial which goes into more details and covers the basics.

Thank you for the suggestion. We're experimenting with monthly subscriptions.

@@sm-journey8281 Thanks for the feedback. You can totally use fylm.ai for stills. You can work with raw files and any grade you create can be applied in Photoshop, Lightroom, Capture One and more…

We would be happy if you gave it a try and told us what you think 🥰

@@fylmai Gave it a try, like the interface...very intuitive and nice workflow. UI-UX is really snappy and easy to read visually. However, FREE trial doesn't have what I would consider the most attractive Ai features...so I can't really tell. I would point that in my (20min) experience, a time trial of the PRO plans is a better way for users to really get a taste of the benefits of the software. Right now, I wouldn't choose the FREE version over using a quick Film Look Creator nod in Davinci. I do see the potential, hopefully I'll get to experience it someday if such trial is implemented. Thanks!

@@lfcruzsierra Thanks for the feedback! I assume you signed up for the free version of fylm.ai Lite? If you sign up for the free version of fylm.ai at app.fylm.ai (instead of lite.fylm.ai) you can try all of the AI tools, but you cannot export a LUT. But, you can always contact our support and ask them for a free LUT or two to try out after you create them in the app. Anyway, thanks for the feedback!

@@luvr Thanks for the feedback

@@JwfilmNmusicStudio Let us know how it goes

Creating a Resolve plugin with all the required functionality is not as straightforward as one would think since DaVinci's API/SDK can be quite limiting. We are working on a plugin though...

One-time payments killed a lot of small good apps through the years and allowed for horrible update cycles. Subscription allows the developer to know how much the users are interested and have a constant cash source to research, develop and update.

Thanks for the feedback!

i agree, the subscription model is annoying AF

I am DONE with buying subscription-based services! Too many of them. We all can't afford this annual crap! I'll either get free luts or buy them, but I'm NOT renting anything! Adobe costs enough already! Stop being so greedy.

Yes! I would buy it if it weren't for the subscription

Totally agreed

That is correct. You do not need to upload the full-res footage. You can simply import ungraded stills, create a LUT, and then export the LUT and use it anywhere.

Yes, you can do that. You need to save the reference as a Match and then you can use that Match in either the Technical Color Match tool or the AI Color Extract.

Thank you for the feedback. At this stage fylm.ai only supports videos in .mp4 format. Mostly, using videos in fylm.ai. is not necessary as fylm.ai is a look/LUT builder and you can easily do it on a still image. Then, you would export your LUT and use it elsewhere.

@@fylmai Ok thanks..I wil try that

The LUT that the tool creates is unaffected by the underlaying image quality. If it looks correct with an 8-bit image it will look even better with a 12 or 10 bit footage. You can use an EXR file in fylm.ai if you wish so (instead of an 8-bit format) for full 16 bit pipeline. As a matter of fact when using EXR files the pipeline in fylm.ai will be 32 bit. The idea of fylm.ai is that you do not need to use it to create a grade for every shot that you have, but rather, quickly and easily establish your show look/LUT or several show looks/LUTs for different parts of your video.

The LUT that you create with fylm.ai will work with any video or still format. You cannot directly load a RED raw file in fylm.ai but you don't need to. A simple screen grab is sufficient to create the look.

LUT always does the same thing. If your image is overexposed it will not be corrected by the LUT. If it has too much contrast and the LUT adds contrast it will become even more contrasty. These are just a few examples.

It doesn't export videos. For videos you export a LUT which you can then use in your NLE. For still images, you export the image.

Please write to our support stating your browser. It's possible that something is blocking the download in your browser. Are you by any chance using Edge?

@@fylmai no I am using chrome, firefox, opera, brave and have tried in all

Yes, you can export .cube LUTs for Premiere Pro. Plugin for Premiere should be coming later.