Відео

It can be heard to pull away from, but once you do you realize how stupid it all is.

I kind of agree with what you're saying about pop culture always being crappy, but I do think there's some merit to the idea that it's even worse now. Well, at least I'd say it's reflective of a worse culture as a whole. Even if you account for survivorship bias, the movies and culture that have "survived" into the modern day (from previous decades) had more too them. At some level they rung more "true". I'm thinking movies like Wizard of Oz, Star Wars (the three original), old Disney movies (Bambi, Beauty and the Beast, etc.). Even the stuff that's considered "good" today really lacks any heart or semblance of heart. Music is a harder one for me to pinpoint or form any solid opinions on. I think because music is so much easier to create (especially nowadays) it's been way more effected by the bifurcation of media. The mainstream stuff is like it's always been because it's got all the money and industry behind it, but the alternative stuff has suffered. The "alternative musicians" aren't really trying as hard because they don't have to and because there's no point to trying. I don't really have the time to write out all my thoughts right now. Also, I didn't mean to disable the comments on my pop culture video. I was trying to disable "comment moderation" (because the auto moderation rules are ridiculous) and screwed up.

Yep.

Even if the fringe lost, the country, or most individuals, are still suffering from liberalism. The Overton window has just shifted so far that we think that most people's beliefs are "okay". In reality, you'd have to go back 100 years to find really good ideology among a large amount of Americans.

Ha! You think the Democrats went far left? You have no idea what far left is, their problem is the opposite. They're not going far left, they're not going anywhere they want to do this stupid "keep the status quo" crap and no matter what you are liberal or conservative both agree that the status quo needs to change.

The moment they actually start going more "left" is the moment they will start to gain way more support, nobody's going to taste something like universal healthcare then wanna go back the days of begging people not to call the ambulance while heavily bleeding. Or go back to the days of spending an arm and a leg for pharmaceutical drugs essential for life. Until then they're the ones being left behind.

Yeah that's why Bernie was so popular with the same demographic trump picked up this time around. That's why the Harris campaign running to the center made them lose their base.

​@@stupidduck3200The Democrats want universal healthcare, but they just haven't moved on it yet. The fact that it's a topic that's taken remotely seriously (especially on a federal level) is just a prime example of how far the Overton Window has shifted and our values have degenerated.

​@@bb-jy7iuYep, Trump got a lot of people on board by promising them stuff the same way the left does. A lot of Trump supporters are a sort of "welfare but only for us" crowd. They aren't Conservatives like the kind we had in the 1800s.

i haven't even watched the video yet, but if you're going to say this, you should be able to say exactly what and exactly why. This "you're wrong but I cant say how or why" reeks of collectivist leftists anti logic.

@@davidgreenwood6029 he called farther left like a guy "like Biden" there really isn't any much to say here. if you think Biden is farther left or Kamala for that matter then you will never believe that Trump is worse then Biden or Kamala. even if you hate the Left you have to recognize that the Left holds very little power int his country. Biden is more systemically a Liberal. same thing with Kamala. Most Leftists are anti-systematic. they don't like the system and probably many Leftists supported Trump to some degree of course Trump isn't the best case scenario for anyone even a Leftist. but a lot of leftists that don't follow Leftist circles tend to vote Trump since he's an authoritarian and many of these quote "Leftists" who aren't Libertarian Leftists but just Soviet tankies who defend Russia and oligarchs for that matter and even China to a definitive degree will usually support a guy like Trump. not all of them some of them don't support him for similar reasons the Libertarian Left-wing doesn't support Trump. but you have to admit this video is just poorly informed and misinformed at worse. since Biden and Kamala are not "Far Leftists"

I look at things in a way I don't think a lot of modern people do. For example, currently I'm getting most of my philosophy from James Burnham and John C. Calhoun. I've yet to really come up with solid terminology. What's something you think is misinformed?

​@@LuciferMorningStar-t8uDespite some policy wavering, Harris and Biden's ideology ultimately comes from the book of equality. Might be using the words left and liberal too interchangeably, but ultimately they (along with Sanders, Chomsky, etc.) represent something that is very adverse to the principles of true Conservativism (Burnham, Calhoun, etc.) Even Trump is liberal when push comes to shove. He's got a healthy right wing streak though.

@@ohlookanotherchris1751 Here I'm just recording with my phone. I do know about better techniques for more professional videos I do for other channels, but here I'm basically just doing journals.

How have the right gone to far? Name one issue? I guess it depends on what you define as the right, but I just don't see it. I want a return to John C. Calhoun and we're not even close to that.

@@andrewtc95 you mean trying to kick out legal immigrants? Chanting lock her up to someone who wasn’t convicted. Letting a convicted felon be the head of there party. Letting a guy with multiple baby mothers and admitted to sexually assaulting women not far? Should I keep going? Isn’t it right wingers trying to assassinate their own candidate? Look don’t bother responding because I can go on for hours.

Supporting stealing an election, taking away abortion rights, attacking trans rights, trying to stop gay marriage again, peeling back child labour laws, refusing to support economic policies that benifit the middle class, supporting a politician who is again open about creating massive tax cuts to the wealthy, throwing vocal support behind Izrael during a Jenocide, supporting a candidate who wants to sue and imprison people over jokes, and some conservative states are trying to lower the age of marriage to the point children can get married. Let's hope yourube doesn't take this comment down, but that's high hopes

Supporting stealing an election, taking away abortion rights, attacking trans rights, trying to stop gay marriage again, peeling back child labour laws, refusing to support economic policies that benifit the middle class, supporting a politician who is again open about creating massive tax cuts to the wealthy, throwing vocal support behind Izrael during a Jenocide, supporting a candidate who wants to sue and imprison people over jokes, and some conservative states are trying to lower the age of marriage to the point children can get married. Let's hope yourube doesn't take this comment down, but that's high hopes

Supporting stealing an election, taking away abortion rights, attacking trans rights, trying to stop gay marriage again, peeling back child labour laws, refusing to support economic policies that benifit the middle class, supporting a politician who is again open about creating massive tax cuts to the wealthy, throwing vocal support behind Izrael during a Jenocide, supporting a candidate who wants to sue and imprison people over jokes, and some conservative states are trying to lower the age of marriage to the point children can get married. Let's hope yourube doesn't take this comment down, but that's high hopes

@@adrianonline69 So basically the point I made in the video was right.

@@dlkjr88 But many people will label her as right wing now. Sadly, the Overton Window has shifted so far that people like her comprise much of the "right".

@@andrewtc95 This is pretty much what I mean. It's akin to the way the US rates itself to have the lowest level of corruption. It's because you've drunk the Koolaid.

Indeed, the pendulum and the people are two seperate factors. Sure the pendulum swings based of of people's political beliefs, but their conviction don't just morph into something else. So if there are new values being added to one "side", it's not going to subtract from those who don't recognize those values and place them on the opposite side of everyone who chose to adapt these politics. However, it's often used by political commentators as an excuse to do just that, e.g., grifting. One example of such a person is Dave Rubin, who was part of the TYT network but "over time" shifted further and further away from his original stand points, and who's been made a laughing stock out of by content creators who've dug through the archives. When it comes to politicians, people often get miscontrued by their kabuki-theatre performances which are meant to polarize and distract the average voter from what really matters; what these politicians are actually voting for. And we fall for it, time and time again. It's all about prioritizing what's relevant to your life quality instead of allowing yourself to be caught up in something that affects a marginality of certain groups, none of which includes yourself or anyone you know. Should I give a f*** about it? Should they give a f*** about it? Are there other, more important things I should give a f*** about?

@@Koperviking The leaders aren't the problem. They are only as corrupt as we allow them to be. Most people today want corrupt leaders. The people are the problem.

@@andrewtc95 That's what my previous comment was meant to touch upon, «... instead of allowing yourself to be caught up in something...». So when you see people who are voting against their best interests, it indicates more than just one problem with the system. Unless it's to their benefit, the people do not wish to see their country fall into the hands of a corrupt politician. It's a quagmire, trying to figure this stuff out, but you could try to look at the flow of information and socio-economic diversity to try and dissect what negatively (or positively) affected the lives of the general population through the outcome of an election, as well as the events that led up to it. For me, the benefit of hailing from Norway enables me to identify these factors without much effort, but for you guys it's an uphill battle. In a corrupt political system, priority #1 is to make sure it stays that way no matter what. So, naturally, having the tools to uncover corruption goes against the interests of said corrupt system.

Does it though? Also, early Americans were very Conservative towards women. I think the Roman Republic was too. Seems to be a prerequisite for making a good civilization. Socrates certainly thought so.

In what way are TYT not left? Last I checked they supported things like gender equality, white guilt, anti colonialism, government hand outs, etc. The fact that they can be considered right in any way shows how skewed we are.

@@andrewtc95 She says things like homeless people want to be homeless lol.

@@andrewtc95 'Murica is so politically skewed right you currently have the choice between; PNAC claiming to stand for progression and democracy (right), and a self-professed wannabe totalitarian fascist dictator (even further right) lol. That you think it's left is dumbfounding.

Few politicians want to do away with the majority of welfare programs and social security, or return power to the states, or put fathers back in charge of the household, etc. The general feeling you get from the American people is even worse. There's such a a sentiment towards equality and guilt on behalf of the successful. The relationship world is heavily slanted towards women and everyone is fine with it. Even Trump supporters are generally pro-welfare and labor laws b.s. - they just want it to favor them and not immigrants. They don't have the spirit of the Founders or great thinkers like Calhoun.

@@andrewtc95 Lmao you're such a hilarious incel it's so funny.

The morality of the old testament in many ways is FAR better than the mushy morals we have today which are abysmal based around equality and the rule of the weak. But that's beside the point. Even if your modern sensibilities were offered that alone wouldn't make the Bible any less true. This was the whole point of my video. Nature is offensive. The weak and the unfit die and the strong reproduce. Runts in a litter often die off because someone has to get the short end of the stick. Too much compassion is a weakness and will get you killed or hold you back. None of these are comfortable truths, but they are nonetheless true.

@@andrewtc95 The lack of morality in the old testament isn't proof of the lack of truth in the old testament, but it IS proof of the lack of morality in the abrahamic god, even if we were to concede the truth of the bible (which, as we both know, we have no reason to do). I don't see a need to respond further. Your love for hierarchy outweighs your lip-service to rationality. Social Darwinism was the means by which a racist population rationalized its knee-jerk reaction to the idea that humans from non-industrial civilizations aren't meaningfully different from anyone else. It's based on a rudimentary misunderstanding of evolution. Humans did not rise to the top of the evolutionary landscape through means of force, cruelty, and superiority, but through means of social cohesion and the sharing of strategies.

I'd say we evolved with a mix of co-operation and use of force. In more recent history, the 13 states co-operates with each other and subjugated the natives and Africans. Depends on who you're dealing with. Also, morality doesn't exist. Our modern sensibilities largely come from our abundance, ease of living and our ability to export the ugly parts of our reality so we don't have to deal with them. Most of us are no more moral than a kid who simply hasn't had to make any difficult decisions. Off course, it's easy for us to have some pretense of morality.

@@lionelhampton6260 dad's

@@andrewtc95 He's disappointed too.

In Reality, Nothing You said is Your View. Its just Rubbish You Copied from Other Atheists. Gen Gyicuide By Flood? Really that's Stew-Pede. By The Way, The Bible does Not "Endorse Slavery". It also does not Excuse Sexual Assault. None of that is Really in The Bible and I Already Know what verses You Talk of such as Deuteronomy 22. The One where Ithioth Aye Thee Yists say teaches a Woman is Forced to Marry Her Reepist. It doesn't Say That, but I am Really Tired of being Told I Have Cognitive Biases and Suffer Cognitive Dissonance and My Explanation is Mental Gymnastics. By the way Gpod is used as a Name. Telling Me god is not a Name but a Title is also Stew-Pede. It doesn;t matter that god is a TItle, We still Capitalise TItles when They are used in Place of a Name. Also, God is Not a Title. No Christian Beleives Peopel are sent to hell for an Etwernity of Tirture just for not Beleivign in God. And You Know that is Not Really what Christians Beleive. You are Not Truth Telling. None of the "Moral poroiblems" with The Bibel the Pastors of Your Aye Theee Yistic Rey Log In are Rational and You are not Rational. This is Not a Valid Objection to Chrystyanyty. its just Junk You WUoted from an Aye Thee Yist Site.

By the way Killing in War is not Murdsr. I Know The Dyvyne Proufit AranRa mMiost Holy says that but he is an Ithoith and So are Yew.

In Reality, Nothing You said is Your View. Its just Rubbish You Copied from Other Atheists. Gen Gyicuide By Flood? Really that's Stew-Pede. By The Way, The Bible does Not "Endorse Slavery". Cont Below.

@@jazzywolfpack9782 If the Bible's god was real than all of those things would be justified and moral. With atheism there is no morals. Just your feelings.

@@andrewtc95 So commanding people to kill is okay. Even though the Ten Commandments say Thou Shall not kill. Don’t you think it’s important for God to practice what he preaches. If he is all powerful and all knowing and can know the future he knew those people would turn evil and he still created them knowing that so he is responsible. If Gods responsible for everything then why can’t we hold him accountable for anything.

Doesn't matter if it goes down the tubes. The country will continue to go left even without one left wing news and commentary source.

Hasnt it already gone down? 20K views on 6M subs...that's sad.

Not in my experience. Most atheist will defend their position with decent evidence, but if you push them you'll find they only really abandoned religion for emotional reasons. They just think atheism better accommodates their liberal values. That isn't to say anything negative about all atheists. Like I said, if you dig deep enough you'll find some really original thinkers who are atheist. But the garden variety atheist isn't so different from the garden variety Christian. Both religion and atheism can be the opium of the weak/liberal masses.

@@andrewtc95 As there is no good evidence for any God or anything supernatural many people today stop believing in a God and become atheists. It really is that simple.

Many people but not most. I really don't think most people think about things rationally or look for truth. It might be hard to believe if you're someone who does, but talk to some random people at your job, the store or family members. People can't think rationally when it comes to something as simple as budgeting or saving for the future. If something good happens to them they say God must be watching over them. If something horrible happens they say no God could let this happen.

@@andrewtc95 I read your replies with interest my friend. If you a ask a dumb non believer that has never given the existance of a God a second thought they are still people that have found no convincing evidence for a God. [presumably if they had they would then become theists?] _'They just think atheism better accommodates their liberal values'_ You ether believe in a God or you don't. If a believer wants to be more liberal and claims he is now an atheist then obviously he is lying to himself [and maybe others] So I think my original point is still valid. Nice talking to you my friend, John.

@@johnhammond6423 - There is No Evydance that Aye The Yists are Aye Thee Yists dew Tew a lack of Evydance. And Plenty that They are Whiney Bullies. I am Sorry but, No, People lyke You are Not Aye Thee Yists Dew Tew Lack of Evydance.

Thousands of immigrants brought into a small town. The locals don't like the immigrants and don't feel represented, but the government is just ignoring them. There's a lot of problems they're causing. Most concerning is probably how they're purchasing a lot of firearms. Nick Johnson on UA-cam has some videos on it. I live 4hrs away, so it hasn't effected me yet, but I've been trying to stay in touch with some people in the area and help if I can. Like I was said awhile back, I think the economy is headed for a really bad turn, and I think this connected.

@@andrewtc95 I checked out that guy and I was immediately quite wary. I don't know how much I trust middle aged white dudes with big ass american flag banners. This could also be some "caravan full of rapists" bullshit... Dock workers strike, war we're probably gonna have, overpopulation due to all the christian nut jobs having 80 kids with their cousins and banning abortion...our time is coming up. How long did it take Rome, Egypt, and England to fall? I think we're gonna look more like the shittiest parts of the UK soon. My canadian friends all talk like it's a worse shithole than what we deal with. The world has been in a worse state and recovered before, but there's still that whole thing where the weather is out to get us. We changed much too rapidly the past 30+ years with the advent of the internet. IDK if the world has always been this crazy or if we're all just hyper aware because we're flooded with "information" constantly. This info is usually filtered through people picking a political party like it's a fucking football team as if divide and conquer wasn't a thing.

I'll do a video giving my response tomorrow. I've tried writing a comment response, but it keeps getting hidden. In fact, I wasn't even notified of your comment. I think it was hidden because you used "bad words".

I was just arguing with a leftist not too long ago about population control. Generally they seem to be worried about global warming, pollution and feeding everyone. Feel like there are some other issues, but I can't think of them right now. I'm pretty sure the streamer Destiny (a far leftist) has talked about population control, but that's only from here say as I don't listen to him. Co-operation and competition aren't mutually exclusive. If a farmer and blacksmith co-operate it's because there's mutual gain to be had. You could even say, in a way, the relationship becomes an abstraction of the tribe - therefore they are able to work together to compete for scarce resources better than some other groups. It's still ultimately competition.

​​@@andrewtc95 Alright. I don't listen to Destiny either but I wouldn't say the concerns about global warming, pollution and feeding everyone come from fears of overpopulation. I tend to see them attribute it to capitalism as a whole, corporations and systematic issues but if you've debated a leftist on it then I can't say much to that. I'm not saying co-operation or competition are mutually exclusive but social Darwinism, from my understanding, certainly doesn't account for it much. The implicit assumption here is that tribes are aware they're competing with other tribes which isn't always true (and it assumes resources are indeed scarce, which is its own discussio). It's mutual survival, not inherently competition

I did reply to your comment, but it got censored by UA-cam. Don't have time to rewrite a response right now, but wanted to let you know I did reply.

@@andrewtc95 And UA-cam didn't even notify me that you did reply :/. Anyway, I appreciate it either way

Kidding, please don't do that

Your correct, it is

Yes. Not as cute as it should be.

So much of modern society and morality is built on B.S. so it makes sense that people aren't taught to think critically. In my experience, you'll actually be shamed for thinking outside the box.

@@andrewtc95 as someone who has been shamed for thinking for myself I agree.

@@NoLiesJustFacts Yep. Shamed and called dangerous and crazy.

I hope it gets better as I think it would be a great tool, but right now I just don't see it. Sounds too good to be true.

Even if the specific language you learn becomes obsolete you'll have gained intellectual growth and experience in problem solving. That's the stuff that really matters.

I think of current AI as only one thing: A SUPER cool tool to create LSD acid art, because frankly, that's the ONLY thing that current AI is good at. It absolutely sucks at math, physics, science, logic or anything else which requires either coherency or consistency. It's absolutely great at hallucinating videos & images if you're on acid & you really don't care how things relate to each other.

It's kind of apples and oranges though. Whether or not it's used for mass surveillance is a problem with the federal government. Not with the technology.

100%. Even if the LLM generates ”worse” code, how will you compete with it being free? Who’s going to pay you $150k to build a web app like every one else, when the LLM can do it for free?

No matter what AI does there will still be jobs. They'll be different and people will have to adjust and change, but that's life. The economy is bad right now not because of AI but because of our stupid idealistic government (voted for by stupid people). Started in the 1930s with FDR and the welfare state.

@@andrewtc95 "voted for by stupid people" I'm not exactly blown away by your massive intellect.

@@archvaldor You don't need to have a massive intellect. You just need to not be stupid. Or just not an emotional voter.

You gay

@@nwic nah bro, just look up old Richard Stallman interview, he just looks like him

@@iusearchbtw69 which one is it now - old richard stallman or young richard stallman???

@@alexvitkov What i'm trying to say is an "old" videos of interview of young Richard Stallman

@@iusearchbtw69 weird how old richard stallman was younger. makes u think

Or the brain of the CEOs, artists specifically have it a bit rough rn cuz of those idiots.

Then i hope you already started pursuing something else!

To some extent I agree, but I also think there's just always going to be a sort of "lower class" in any given field - people who probably just need to keep a bigger rainy day fund because they're more disposable by nature. They just need to always be prepared to train for paradigm changes. The bigger problem that makes life unnecessarily hard for people like this is government inference which subsidize the parasite class at the true lower class's expense.

@@andrewtc95 We have that underbelly and always have...people who have been "mediocre" at their jobs will always be that "lower class" so to speak because they provide less value than the specialists or 10x dev. I think the political discussion of government warrants an entirely different discussion, because you're not wrong about that.

@@WiggleWizard The lower class are always going to have to go with the flow so to speak. If industries change, they have to retrain. If industries are taken out entirely, they have to find new ones. That's just the natural order. The problem comes in when people try to change things through politics, which is why voting needs to be restricted. Like I said, the lower class is being unnecessarily hurt right now but not by AI or greedy rich corporations. By the parasite class - a class that shouldn't even exist but does because of government subsidies. But unfortunately everyone blames the wrong factors.

Rich people can be dumb emotional thinkers. As long as they're allowed to fail and don't get a bail out the market can work like it's supposed to. For the people call for a ban on AI, they're just modern day luddites. The world has always been better for technological advances. AI is just another technological advance.

@@andrewtc95 you're still not getting it, it has nothing to do with being stuck in the past and everything to do with having a future. You still operate under this magical thinking that wealthy people, the people holding most of the power, also follow the same rules as you and I, if they fail, they WILL get bailed out because they understand full well that the individualistic, self made man is a fallacy that is only meant for the poors.