Відео

Playing FC5 in 2025. Yessiirrrr

i give you reason beacause you need to see the landmarks to remember... gg man... outside of the box thinking

Can't relate. I play Palworld despiste lacking a minimap, not because it lacks a minimap.

*disable hud *disable minimap yep its gaming time

Was thinking about this while playing rdr2, great beautiful game, but i kept looking at the minimap more than at the actual world, i've even tried to switch from minimap to compass to reduce this.

Best one I've seen is Fire Watch. You can turn off mini map and points. You have an actual map and it's up to you to find out where you actually are. Just like in real life

I've been playing minecraft for as long as I can remember, I cant even remember not having it.

I like the approach they took in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle concerning the mini-map in regards of immersion. 1- The mini-map is off unless you open it. Meaning that if you want to you can simply never use the mini map in the first place. 2- The mini-map comes in the form of a map that your character has inserted within his journal. Meaning that there is an in-game explanation to why you are looking at a map; which is even more reinforced by the fact that every level you collect or are given by someone the map of the location.

doesn't look promising at all.

Not only no minimap, but also no HUD or as minimal HUD you can get away with. I don't know why devs insist on these really heavy thick framed HUD elements (like Skyrim and KC:D in your example) when the same information could be displayed in a much more subtle way. Good games let you customize the HUD, in great games they are designed in a way that you don't need one.

You are the first one who addressed the W3 endings problem.

Quick note for the witcher 3: I've found an excellent mod, that allows me to have the minimap off during gameplay, but automatically turn on for a few seconds when I press the Alt key.

While some of the criticism I've heard for Witcher 4 are valid or at least worthy of discussion (CDPR hiring practices, Witcher Ciri breaks lore, etc.) the criticisms I don't understand is Ciri being uglified. I didn't think Ciri looked ugly at all and I'm convinced some of these critics are either trolls or just want something to be angry about.

true bro

Everyone who knows the witcher and its story knew already what kind of direction the witcher 4 story will take. Braindead people want to be mad about ciri in there????

There is no "Ciri dies" ending, she just disappears. CDPR has also confirmed that she has completed the trial and is now a Witcher, so yes, something will happen to her powers.

Ciri become empress. That is the canon, that is what she choose herself. Of course we can make her father lost or not taken her to to him, only than she become a witcher, ehen the option for her to become empress is not there. But if she can, she would.

Slavic culture represented in the cinematic 🙏

Not really hyped, witcher 3 is very hard to beat! Don't know why it's maining ciri, she is the reason that everyone left the dumb woke tv series

А я больше волнуюсь, что новые свитки выйдут не очень

They obviously going to nerf her... Lol... And hopefully change the abilities

When it comes to ciri beying overpowered, the game is as easy as you want, its rpg after all, you can gear up or change difficulty, geralt in witcher 3 is overpowered compared to books, but noone cares bcs its fun, you can literally become a mage if u have a good build, and spam signs like a madman, what i see tho with ciri is a great option to fast travel from whereever you are, seems like a great quality of life feature

When it comes to witcher 3 endings, we dont see ciri or geralt dying, its just said, soo she can come back, just a bit later and then become a witcher, and if she becomes nilfgard queen, she can get bored of that, run away and also become a witcher, soo all 3 endings lead to that possibility, it just opens dialogue options depending on choices

nah far cry 5 is like 4th for me. game couldn't hook me at all with the story. The gameplay was fun but felt very disconnected at times. I beat the whole game 100% but only out of obligation. I had a good time but compared to the other games, it did not hook me

Never played the game, but Pagan sounds a bit like Dr. Doom, minus the ego.

Nice video. Couldn't ageee more with your points.

Dishonored games should be here.

Glad to see far cry 5 on the top spot! It deserves it 100%

What scares me is that actual talent behind Witcher and Cyberpunk are gone, joined other studios or started their own (Rebel Wolves). And seeing what kind of hiring practices they have now, I am really afraid of the future of Witcher franchise.

Pagan isn't exactly a nice guy, but Amita turning into a drug lord for the sake of the country is kinda bullsh!t, especially taking kids as soldiers, hahaha. Or Sabal forcing a child to accomplish old traditions by force. For me, Kyrat was brainwashed by these two

I decided to download the game today and this video was perfect to watch before i dive into the game! Crossing my fingers i find enjoyment and experience what everyone else before me discovered in the game.

What game were you playing at 3:45. I wanna try it

You've got my subscribe man,great video,will watch other.

lol I just bought this game and will be playing it for the first time today when it gets here. Not sure why I haven't bought it til now, but seems a lot of people love it so I bought the special edition to give it a shot. I got it new and sealed, only wondering if I should save it for later and buy a used one to actually play.

i had a similar view as you when it came to multiplayers games through league, csgo apex, rain bow six siege i thought through the total 10k hours ive spent between the 4 games i still suck at them and am silver-gold rating after all this time and whenever i played i was not enjoying a single second of it so i thought, why the fuck am i still playing these games? i am not improving my skill, i am getting angry and not enjoying the gameplay, the comunitys are toxic cest pools, quit multiplayer games in 2020 with covid for strictly single player games and i have no idea why i didnt sooner for each experience of a 20-40 hr single player game i enjoyed every hour of it, especially during covid i played all the final fantasy games 1-15 ( not 14 the mmo) and man single player games just make me happy and enjoy gaming again. i dont know why i didnt play strictly single player earlier

thanks for not including god of war....😂 overrated in my opinion .🥲

Yes - I will still play Skyrim in 2025 (of course!)

Older games were fun they did not have following bs 1) too much grinding to get skills,gear 2) repetitive quests 3) complex controls which requires you to learn the game to enjoy it anyone with a basic understanding of the games can enjoy it

Both Amita and Sabal were way worse than pagan. Amita was the better of the two because while she starts mandatory military inscriptions a thing to protect the drug fields that was not her goal her goal was to create a stable economy with thriving industries, however to do it she had to go by means that she didn’t want but viewed as necessary until other businesses took off. Whereas with what you said sabal wanted a terrorist state where you follow their gods, be imprisoned for non obedience or killed for offending their gods some amita is the best of the 2 but still a bad option. I was extremely disappointed that we didn’t get a pagan campaign like we did for Amita and sabal. The hole point is your choice and it didn’t let you see what choicing pagan from the start of the campaign would mean.

I concur, could have an alternate option to side with pagan min

This is the beauty of this game. There is no real good option. You came here, you see a brutal dictator and you are saved by the rebels, who glorify your father's name. Then you learn that the rebels are either religious fanatics or a wannabe drug cartel, that your father murdered your step-sister in cold blood, and that your mother was actually in love with the dictator, who is still brutal by the way. And the only way to fulfill your mother's wish is not to kill the villain, because if you do you'll never learn the truth and find your lost sister. And in the meantime, you became a soldier and a killer. There is no good guy, not even the protagonist.

Yes, he was a good guy to Ajay, he clearly cares about him, he tries to make up for the misunderstanding in the opening section, willingly steps down from power if you spare him thus letting you take over, and takes you right to Lahksmana in the secret ending, as well as the lesser of evils compared to the Golden Path leaders. If only the game let you side with him, Amita and Sabal's ending just feel wrong and the game knows it. Lore wise Pagan was a decent ruler in fact, all went to shit only when Mohan Gale, the Leader of the Golden path killed Pagan's daugter which was a toddler at the time.

I think games (late 2000's - early 2010's) look better, because in real life your eyes don't see everything in hyper detail unless you directly focus on it. The simpler graphics are more akin to how people see in real life rather than everything being so shiny, crisp, and 100% sharpness.

This game gives you a feeling of accomplishment, knowing that you figured out where to go and what to do, with no map markers and no hand holding. You actually had to pay attention and listen (or read) what the NPCs were saying. How games, and times, have changed since then.

Great Points. But I'd argue that Assassin's Creed isn't the greatest example just on the grounds that for their time they have always been really beautiful graphically. The Elder Scrolls have 1000% gone downhill from a story and gameplay perspective they have been basically stripped down. My issue with newer games is that they always have to interject some real world agenda into them that take me out of the world.

Pagan Min is basically any other real life modern dictator, like the Middle Eastern dictators: Saddam Hussein and Col. Muammar Gaddafi for example. Both were, by no means, bad people, but their dictatorial rule, no matter how brutal, brought stability to their respective nations and made them somewhat prosperous. Iraq became quite a powerful nation in the Middle East in terms of economy and military, and Libya was so successful under Gaddafi, that the nation at one point of time had a GDP per capita higher than the United States and the EU. Look what happened after they were toppled? Terrorism and conflict plagues Iraq and Libya and they are destabilized like hell. Like you said, Pagan is a necessary evil to prevent more chaos, and that's what a dictator truly is. And I like how much they humanized tha concept with Pagan and actually created a dilemma with the player by giving them a personal connection to Pagan. Far Cry games have some insane deep meanings behind them, and FC4 delivered well.

Literally me, the only difference is that I like to play multiplayer offline with my friends and brothers and also that I don't play modern single-player games. The last ones I purshased was Mario Party 9 on 2012 and Minecraft Legacy xbox 360 edition on the same year.

I take issue with graphical limitations being a factor here. When Morrowind and Oblivion came out, its graphics were HYPE. I remember drooling over Oblivion's screenshots before it came out thinking "There is no way this will ever run on my computer." Graphics have been a major selling point for decades, but the difference seems to be in the passion of games' creators. I also think that games used to be made to be fun, whereas now they're made to be addictive.

Just saw this video. No way the mess that is Far Cry 6 is better than Far Cry 2. The DLC is, sadly, the ONLY reason to play 6. I do agree with the rest of your list. Far Cry 5 is my number 1 as well. They knocked it out of the park with that one. Subscribed. 😁

The game did give you the option to be with Pagan. "Stay here. Enjoy the Crab Rangoon. Don't. Move. I'll be right back." He is very particular with his words.