King James Bible Research Council
King James Bible Research Council
  • 120
  • 593 226
What Is Wrong With The ESV?
We get this question frequently. People want to know from our perspective just what is wrong with the ESV? After all, isn't the English Standard Version just an update of the King James Bible? In this video, Dr. Dan Haifley answers both of hose questions.
Subscribe for more videos!
​⁠ @kjbrc
Follow us on Facebook
KJBRC
Visit our Website
kjbrc.org/
Listen on Spotify
open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C
Get a copy of Dr. Haifley's book here
www.amazon.com/Keys-Are-Gone-critique-Standard/dp/1518727433/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1S1HD285Q3MY0&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.cnBG5fYZWRbkij-1IDNlWm-o9BN9FuRlYWIQi4Usncc.it6NRXOECtDMsAS0xqBy2T1NLwmi8o5mQyVsGeEw5hM&dib_tag=se&keywords=the+keys+are+gone+esv&qid=1724943947&sprefix=the+keys+are+gone+esv%2Caps%2C140&sr=8-1
#kjv
#esv
#bible
Переглядів: 5 317

Відео

The Power of Chick Tracts
Переглядів 1,3 тис.21 день тому
It was our honor to host our friend David Daniels of Chick Publications at our 2024 National Conference. In this video he tells the story of Chick Tracts and why they are so effective For more information visit chick.com/ Subscribe for more videos! ​⁠@kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv #...
In Defense of 1 John 5:7 - Dr. Phil Stringer
Переглядів 2,9 тис.Місяць тому
Should 1 John 5:7 be included in our Bibles? We think so! In the final session of our 2024 National Conference, Dr. Phil Stringer gives a powerful defense for one of the most controversial Bible verses of all time. Subscribe for more videos! @kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv
The Preservation of Scripture - Dr. David Sorenson
Переглядів 1,7 тис.Місяць тому
What has God preserved? His thoughts, His message, or His Words? In this session, Dr. David Sorenson gives a defense of the preservation of the Scripture. Subscribe for more videos! @kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv
The Confusion of Balaam and Modern Versions - Dr. Steve Zeinner
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Місяць тому
In this session, Dr. Stephen Zeinner lays out why modern translations of the Bible ultimately cause confusion. Subscribe for more videos! @kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv
Why Apologetics Matters - Dr. Steve Damron
Переглядів 990Місяць тому
We were honored to welcome Dr. Steve Damron as our guest at this year’s National Conference. In this session he tells us why apologetics matter. Subscribe for more videos! @kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv
Bible Expert Reacts To Pawn Stars - The Gutenberg Bible
Переглядів 2 тис.Місяць тому
Here's something new! As many of you know, KJBRC President Dr. David Brown is also the curator of the Biblical Heritage Archive Museum. As such he is an expert on certain biblical antiques especially old bibles. In this video he watches a clip Pawn Stars featuring the Gutenberg Bible and tells us how accurate it is. To bring Dr. Brown and his museum to your event send an email to, drdavidbrown@...
The Masoretic Text Of The KJV - Dr. Doug Levesque
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Місяць тому
In this session, Dr. Levesque gives us a fascinating look at the Hebrew Masoretic Text that underlies the Old Testament of our King James Bible! Subscribe for more videos! @kjbrc Follow us on Facebook KJBRC Visit our Website kjbrc.org/ Listen on Spotify open.spotify.com/show/4rCajOWfdlvg69LquOrr5C #kjv #hebrew
What the ESV Generation Will Lose - Dr. Dan Haifley
Переглядів 5 тис.Місяць тому
In this session Dr. Dan Haifley examines what important aspects of God’s Word are left behind in the translation of the ESV Subscribe for more videos Follow us on Facebook Visit kjbrc.org for more information #kjv
KJV Questions & Comments
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Місяць тому
Do we believe in dual inspiration? Does the King James Bible replace the Greek? Are we Ruckmanites? In this video, Dr. Levesque and Pastor Georges answer your kind (and not so kind) questions and comments regarding the KJV and the KJBRC! Post any further questions in the comments below Subscribe for more videos! kjbrc.org Visit kjbrc.org for more information #kjv
In a Better Translation... - Jared Longsine
Переглядів 2,3 тис.Місяць тому
Have you ever heard someone say, "A better translation would be" when referencing the wording of the King James Bible? Is this actually true? Is the rendering of the Greek and Hebrew into English for our KJV really a poor translation? In this session, Pastor Jared Longsine answers this question head on. Subscribe for more videos Follow us on Facebook Visit kjbrc.org for more information #KJV
So, You Want to Update the King James Bible? - Mark Reno
Переглядів 4,6 тис.2 місяці тому
So, You Want to Update the King James Bible? - Mark Reno
Our Blood Bought English Bible - Dr. David Brown
Переглядів 2,3 тис.2 місяці тому
Our Blood Bought English Bible - Dr. David Brown
Vaticanus, Sinaiticus & The End Times Bible - David Daniels
Переглядів 7 тис.2 місяці тому
Vaticanus, Sinaiticus & The End Times Bible - David Daniels
Why the KJV is Irreplaceable - Manny Rodriguez
Переглядів 4,9 тис.2 місяці тому
Why the KJV is Irreplaceable - Manny Rodriguez
Examining the KJV Preface - Josh Levesque
Переглядів 2,4 тис.2 місяці тому
Examining the KJV Preface - Josh Levesque
Biblical Principles and Bible Versions - Dr. Steve Combs
Переглядів 2,8 тис.2 місяці тому
Biblical Principles and Bible Versions - Dr. Steve Combs
Will the King James Bible Prevail? Dr. Jason Georges
Переглядів 1,9 тис.2 місяці тому
Will the King James Bible Prevail? Dr. Jason Georges
What Will God Preserve? Psalm 12:6-7
Переглядів 7995 місяців тому
What Will God Preserve? Psalm 12:6-7
The KJBRC 2024 National Conference
Переглядів 7535 місяців тому
The KJBRC 2024 National Conference
Who Was Erasmus?
Переглядів 4,7 тис.6 місяців тому
Who Was Erasmus?
The History of the Textus Receptus
Переглядів 4,4 тис.7 місяців тому
The History of the Textus Receptus
The Christmas Story From Luke 2
Переглядів 4838 місяців тому
The Christmas Story From Luke 2
Archaic Words in the KJV
Переглядів 2,2 тис.9 місяців тому
Archaic Words in the KJV
Omnigender - The Sad Story Of The NIV
Переглядів 3,9 тис.9 місяців тому
Omnigender - The Sad Story Of The NIV
Bible Museum Walkthrough with Dr David Brown
Переглядів 1,2 тис.9 місяців тому
Bible Museum Walkthrough with Dr David Brown
Is The KJV Inspired?
Переглядів 1,8 тис.9 місяців тому
Is The KJV Inspired?
The Gunpowder Plot and the King James Bible
Переглядів 3,3 тис.10 місяців тому
The Gunpowder Plot and the King James Bible
Why does the KJV have the Apocrypha?
Переглядів 3,1 тис.11 місяців тому
Why does the KJV have the Apocrypha?
Is The Apocrypha Scripture?
Переглядів 2,2 тис.11 місяців тому
Is The Apocrypha Scripture?

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @lavalleeverdun
    @lavalleeverdun 4 години тому

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, your honor and members of the court. The prosecution, a "Doctor" Stringer, has presented his case before the court. Such a case would have best been examined under a debate with an experienced scholar and gentleman like Dr White. However, Dr White is not available at this time. On trial here today is Dr Phil Stringer. Many of his followers are under the impression the Masoretic Text is superior to the Greek Old Testament as translated by the seventy-two Hebrew scholars of days gone by. So without further ado, we wish to represent our client, the Septuagint in defense of Doctor Stringer. *Exhibit 1 ― Matthew 13:14-15 // Isaiah 6:10* “And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, ‘By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: for this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.” -KJV New Testament “Ye shall hear indeed, but ye shall not understand; and ye shall see indeed, but ye shall not perceive. For the heart of this people has become gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.” -Isaiah 6:9-10 // *Brenton's Septuagint 1851* “And he said, ‘Go, and tell this people, “Hear ye indeed, but understand not; And see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, And make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; Lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, And understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.” -Isaiah 6:10 // *King James Masoretic text* Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: please consider respectfully. Some of you have never actually _seen_ text from the Septuagint. Do not be triggered. Compare the 70 to the New Testament. Rest assured both OT texts are copied exactly. (To be continued...)

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 4 години тому

      There was nothing to debate here, and you lost what remained of your so-called mind. QED.

  • @ChristopherAlsruhe-si9ff
    @ChristopherAlsruhe-si9ff 8 годин тому

    A lot. This not including the false and boastful advertising the publisher gives it.

  • @joshuaa3075
    @joshuaa3075 12 годин тому

    People like Mondo Gonzales and Lee Branard don’t know about the incorrect base text. Mondo recently said in a prophecy watchers video on the pre-trib rapture with Lee Branard that he was educated by some jehovahs witnesses that 1st John 5:7 is changed because oldest and best manuscripts say it shouldn’t be there. Mondo and Lee just go along with whatever people say instead of educating themselves.

  • @jeffberkey4477
    @jeffberkey4477 День тому

    Thank you very much!!!!

  • @CalebRichardson
    @CalebRichardson День тому

    16:45 is this an official position of the KJBRC, that God did something supernatural in the KJV that he hasn’t done in any other language?

  • @jjpetkusiii
    @jjpetkusiii День тому

    There was nothing to debate here. λεγει αυτω ο ιησους εγω ειμι η οδος και η αληθεια και η ζωη ουδεις ερχεται προς τον πατερα ει μη δι εμου Dicit ei Iesus ego sum via et veritas et vita nemo venit ad Patrem nisi per me [Iohannes 14:6]. In perfect English, those ancient Greek and Latin texts read: “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me" (John 14: 6). Everlasting salvation from sin by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ because of His finished work on Calvary testifies of His eternal holiness. The only-begotten Son of God is the Prince of Peace, and the Saviour averred the Hebrew Tanakh consistently as a documented matter of immutable fact. The infallible King James Bible preserves the Old and New Testaments in the lingua franca of the world today. We know the Triune God is represented in the Hebrew Tanakh as well as the Received Text, and the fulfillment of prophecy confirms the veracity of the Gospel over the millennia. The matter at hand in Dr. Stringer's edifying message is the purity of the Holy Scriptures, and his presentation about the dubious historicity of the LXX is correct as to the pertinent facts. Too many Alexandrian cultists have ignored his wholesome exegesis. Their denial is palpable, and the so-called modern versions just rehash the corrupted parchments of the revisionist "Critical Text." The operation of the Holy Spirit is exposited conclusively in the Pauline epistles of the Authorised Version even during the present dispensation of grace. These are perilous times indeed, and our adversary seeking whom he may devour knows that his time is short. The rapture of the Bride of Christ precedes the time of Jacob’s trouble, and Francis Turretin documented that no authoritative Septuagint can be found centuries ago. Shalom aleichem!

  • @user-vq6gj6to1e
    @user-vq6gj6to1e День тому

    Mev psalm 50:1 1 The Mighty One, God, is the Lord; He has spoken and summoned the earth Psalm 50:1 KJV 50 The mighty God, even the Lord, hath spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof from the rising of the sun to its setting

  • @jeffberkey4477
    @jeffberkey4477 День тому

    Great summary of the many inaccuracies of a counterfeited document. And thanks for using several authoritative speakers to do so!!!!

  • @jjpetkusiii
    @jjpetkusiii 2 дні тому

    There was nothing to debate here. Calvin's philosophy has no bearing on the exegesis of the Holy Scriptures in any language. Of course, John Calvin connived at the murder of Michael Servetus, and obstinate Calvinist heretics approve of such homicidal behaviors. Dr. Stringer presented his research into the dubious historicity of the LXX, and his explanation aligns with reliable Biblical scholarship. His edifying presentation is factually correct although it constituted neither a formal argument nor a roundtable discussion to be hijacked by crackpot Alexandrian cultists on social media per se. Popular surveys prove nothing about the incarnation, ministry, death, burial and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ other than what the frequency of a respondent's assertion might be. The opinions of students have no bearing on proven facts or absolute objective truth in and of themselves. Moreover, no authoritative Septuagint can be found anywhere just as the brilliant Francis Turretin demonstrated centuries ago. For more details, please refer to James 2 : 1 and Luke 2 : 1- 33 along with Deuteronomy 32 : 4 and Ephesians 2 : 8-9 in the infallible King James Bible today. Shalom aleichem!

  • @FilibertoPetraglia-u3z
    @FilibertoPetraglia-u3z 2 дні тому

    Vito Ramp

  • @sandrahmiel7262
    @sandrahmiel7262 3 дні тому

    Wow Thank Lord God for preserving Hos Word and for being far ahead of the false so called experts bec they are being exposed with their false so called documents

  • @johnbryant1341
    @johnbryant1341 4 дні тому

    Does Dr Stringer realize that the King James Translators in the KJB literally state that yhe Apostles used the Septuagint? And also when the Septuagint was written? It says so in the King James Bible!

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 4 дні тому

      No, he does not realize such a falsehood. There was nothing to debate here. ερευνατε τας γραφας οτι υμεις δοκειτε εν αυταις ζωην αιωνιον εχειν και εκειναι εισιν αι μαρτυρουσαι περι εμου. Translated into perfect English, those Koine Greek words of the Lord Jesus Christ read: “Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me” (John 5: 39). Everlasting salvation from sin by grace through faith in the only-begotten Son of God because of His finished work on Calvary alone testifies of His eternal holiness. The KING of KINGS and LORD of LORDS is the Prince of Peace, and the Saviour averred the Hebrew Tanakh consistently as a documented matter of immutable fact. The matter at hand in Dr. Stringer’s edifying message is the purity of the Holy Scriptures, and his presentation about the historiography of the LXX is factually correct. Moreover, no authoritative Septuagint can be found anywhere just as the brilliant Francis Turretin documented centuries ago. Too many Alexandrian cultists have ignored their wholesome exegeses. Their denial is palpable, and the so-called modern versions just rehash the corrupted parchments of the revisionist “Critical Text.” The operation of the Holy Spirit is exposited conclusively in the Pauline epistles during this present dispensation of grace. These are perilous times indeed, and our adversary seeking whom he may devour knows that his time is short. The rapture of the Bride of Christ precedes the time of Jacob’s trouble, and the fulfillment of prophecy confirms the veracity of the Gospel over the millennia. For more details, please refer to Hebrews 4 : 12 and Mark 13 : 31 along with 2 Timothy 3 : 16 and Psalms 12 : 6-7 in the infallible King James Bible today.

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 3 дні тому

      No, "OfMice AndMen" a. k. a. " @@lavalleeverdun " et alia. You are wrong again by your own MickeyMouse admission. QED.

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 3 дні тому

      There was nothing to debate here. No offense is intended but you , "OfMice AndMen" a. k. a. "@@lavalleeverdun" et alia failed to tell us what your native tongue is other than a sloppy mouthpiece for your father the devil whereas we already understand that you are totally illiterate in Koine Greek and Biblical Hebrew. I have all the incontrovertible proof of the birth, ministry, crucifixion, death, burial and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, my Saviour forever, that I need. "And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness, and he was called the Friend of God" (James 2 : 23). The entire Old Testament was complete with the last word of Malachi. Dr. Stringer presented his research into the historiography of the LXX, and his presentation is factually correct. Moreover, no authoritative Septuagint can be found anywhere as the brilliant Francis Turretin demonstrated centuries ago. For more details, please refer to Hebrews 4 : 12 and Mark 13 :31 along with 2 Timothy 3 : 16 and Psalms 12 : 6-7 in the infallible King James Bible today. No further evidence of your toxic narcissism and hackneyed libels in English is warranted. QED.

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 3 дні тому

      There was nothing to debate here. Dr. Stringer presented his research into the dubious historicity of the LXX, and his presentation is correct as to the pertinent facts. The entire Old Testament in Biblical Hebrew was complete with the last verse of Malachi. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God" (Matt. 5 : 8). Moreover, no authoritative Septuagint can be found anywhere. For more details, please refer to Titus 3 : 5 along with 2 Peter 3 : 9-10 and Luke 16 : 19-31 in the New Testament of the infallible King James Bible.

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 3 дні тому

      There was nothing to debate here. Learn to read, "OfMice AndMen" a.k.a "@@lavalleeverdun" You are wrong again by your own MickeyMouse (and MinnieMouse) admissions, but I was right in the first place. No further explanation of the evidence is warranted. QED.

  • @John-hp8sg
    @John-hp8sg 4 дні тому

    Brother, I admire your dedication to one translation of the Bible. If you have time, you should check out the book: The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations? By Dr. James White. It really opened my eyes to God’s Word and why the other translations are different. I really hope you would look at it. It really explains a lot of the differences.

  • @Anarul-f4j
    @Anarul-f4j 4 дні тому

    Miller Elizabeth Lopez Susan Thomas David

  • @jeffberkey4477
    @jeffberkey4477 5 днів тому

    Very good and to the point! Thank you!

    • @kjbrc
      @kjbrc 4 дні тому

      Thanks!

  • @gowdsake7103
    @gowdsake7103 5 днів тому

    Bi sexual, unwashed and a mass murderer. You think that burning women alive is MORAL ! wow you are sick Summarising the views of more recent historians social historian Emma Dabiri stated in 2017 that now few historians and biographers doubt that James was "either gay or bisexua Keith Coleman's 2023 biography James VI and I: The King Who United Scotland and England see James's relationships with Somerset and Buckingham as sexual, adding that his relationship with Lennox probably also was Once more lies for jebus and iron age ignorance

  • @karstenbunde9465
    @karstenbunde9465 5 днів тому

    The biggest problem for the KJV is, that many manuscripts that were found in the last 4 centuries could not be considered by Erasmus. Many of the earliest texts concerning certain passages are among them. It has been found that certain verses could not be found in the earliest manuscripts (Matthew 17,21 is one of those, especially the phrase about fasting). If you find several manuscripts that are the earliest that do not contain certain verses, you have to consider what the original autographs were like. Examples for verses missing in the earliest known manuscripts for that passage include well known stories: The woman caught in adultery (John 8,1-11), the verse about an angel moving the water of the pool of Bethesda (John 5,4), the end of the gospel of Mark (Mark 16,9-20) and some more. All these are in the KJV, despite them not being present in the earliest manuscripts.

    • @sdlorah6450
      @sdlorah6450 5 днів тому

      Recommended: Neither Oldest nor Best: How the Foundational Manuscripts of Modern Bible Translations are Unreliable, by Dr. David A. Sorenson.

    • @Coal_Burner
      @Coal_Burner 3 дні тому

      @@sdlorah6450Recommeneded: How We Got The Bible by Timothy Paul Jones

  • @sprayarm
    @sprayarm 6 днів тому

    ESV is basically a New-New RSV. New RSV came out in 1989.

  • @repentbelieve1
    @repentbelieve1 6 днів тому

    The modern perVersions are a bridge to Babylon. The King James Bible is the only trustworthy English translation with the deity of Christ, the gospel of the kingdom, and doctrines unaltered by whims and biases of men. It is a word for word translation, and if any extra words were added by the translators, they are italicized. How do the modern perVersion translators compare to the beliefs & credentials of the 54 English translators working on the KJV over 7 years? Who were: Most learned men of their day - Masters of Greek, Latin & Hebrew - Classical education growing up - They reverenced the scriptures - 4 College Presidents - 6 Bishops - 5 Deans- 30 PHD's - 39 Master's Degrees - 41 University Professors - 12 Masters of Hebrew language - 10 Mastered Greek - Every one believed in the deity of Jesus Christ - Believed in the verbal inspiration of scriptures - Masters of linguistics - All men of prayer - Considered themselves "poor instruments to make God's holy truth to be yet more and more known onto the people."

  • @paulagonzalez1708
    @paulagonzalez1708 6 днів тому

    ESV should be inside a dumpster not talked about because there’s only one manuscript in this planet preserved by the Holy Ghost is the KJV 1611 nothing more nothing less on top of that the ESV is a Demonic Manuscript 🐍🥹🐍🐍🥹🐍🥹🐍🐍🥹🐍🐍

  • @richardkramer4474
    @richardkramer4474 6 днів тому

    ESV is corrupt!

  • @johnnyvans_77
    @johnnyvans_77 6 днів тому

    KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD IM A FILIPINO AND TAGALOG BIBLE IS CORRUPTED AND GOD LEAD ME TO READ KJV BIBLE I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO PRESERVE HIS WORD BECAUSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS THE MOST SPOKEN UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE OF THIS WORLD EVEN ANY NATIONALITY READ KJV BIBLE BACAUSE KJV BIBLE IS PURE WORD PRAISE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL TRUTH PRESERVE PURE WORD, KJV IS MATHEMATICAL PERFECTION AND WITHOUT ERROR, KJV AROUND THE WORLD 🌍🔥✝️🔥🙌🇮🇱🇺🇸🇵🇭🇹🇱🇿🇼🇹🇷🇹🇳🇾🇪🇹🇭🇻🇪🇾🇪🇺🇿🇬🇧🇹🇬🇸🇪❤

  • @supermarioglitchy10
    @supermarioglitchy10 6 днів тому

    ever tried to do the Sana'a manuscript method where you do a simple x-ray?

  • @karldegroot1800
    @karldegroot1800 6 днів тому

    esv is but the consequence of the corrupt KJV. Hence Christ removes the seals [=corruptions] from God's scroll : for in Rev.1 He dont hold '7 + stars' [thats Esau's nonsense] but 'the corrupt + scroll' - and He is fúrious ! He warns 'Pergamos' to NOT go compose the KJV but they do - it never said 'throne of + satan' there but 'word of + God' (satanas=thronos) .

  • @preacherman9018
    @preacherman9018 7 днів тому

    Romans 1:16 ..."16For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth". Chick tracks proclaim a FALSE Gospel at the conclusion of them. How is a false response to what Christ did on our behalf "power?"

  • @rosslewchuk9286
    @rosslewchuk9286 7 днів тому

    The OT quotations found in the NT are worded by the Holy Spirit. Why go outside the TR for other sources? Also, Turretin forbids using the LXX to "correct" the Masoretic Text. The Holy Spirit used quotations from various works to make a point, but that does not mean He considers the whole of such works to be inspired: only those portions found in the TR.

    • @rosslewchuk9286
      @rosslewchuk9286 6 днів тому

      He sure is free to do so! We have what He chose in His New Testament! How is that sophistry? James 3:17-18 King James Version (KJV)But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace. May the Lord bless you!🙏📖

    • @rosslewchuk9286
      @rosslewchuk9286 6 днів тому

      I am a Byzantine prioritist not a KJVO. I prefer the KJV and NKJV. To observe other perspectives, I also consult Robinson-Pierpont, Pickering, Boyd, WEB, BSB, NET, LSB and the NET LXX, Lexham LXX and Swete's LXX Psalter, La Sainte Bible Louis Segond 1910 and 2021, snd Bib la an Kreyòl ayisyen. May God bless you!🙏

    • @rosslewchuk9286
      @rosslewchuk9286 6 днів тому

      You need to read more Bible and less other non-inspired writings. And Gipp & Riplinger are not even near my ballpark. May God bless you! 🙏📖

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 6 днів тому

      @@rosslewchuk9286 There was nothing to debate here. Dr. Stringer presented his research into the dubious historicity of the LXX, and his presentation is correct as to the pertinent facts. Moreover, no authoritative Septuagint can be found anywhere as the brilliant Francis Turretin documented centuries ago. All the Apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ understood Biblical Hebrew. They knew that the canon of the Old Testament was complete with the last word of Malachi, and none of them required any translation of it into Hellenistic Greek. The operation of the Holy Scriptures is exposited conclusively in the Pauline epistles. "And God said, Let there be light: and there was light" (Genesis 1 :3). There is no reason at all to doubt any verse that is preserved in the infallible King James Bible today. Shalom aleichem!

    • @jjpetkusiii
      @jjpetkusiii 6 днів тому

      @@lavalleeverdun No.

  • @DannoRomann
    @DannoRomann 7 днів тому

    The ESV is a good translation Believing that the KJV is the only Bible anyone can use is utterly ridiculous Preferring it is fine and not extreme but saying it's the only Bible that is acceptable is beyond silly

    • @jonathanclemens4660
      @jonathanclemens4660 7 днів тому

      Amen

    • @risermoreriser4237
      @risermoreriser4237 7 днів тому

      The ESV OT is very poor. In fact, the KJV is much better in the fact that the KJV includes LXX readings...........

  • @robertj5208
    @robertj5208 7 днів тому

    KJV is a decent translation. A few problems, but decent.

  • @arkansasrebel348
    @arkansasrebel348 8 днів тому

    Did the ESV remove verses or the KJV add verses. I believe that the KJV has added verses!!

    • @sprayarm
      @sprayarm 6 днів тому

      They are based on different manuscripts families.

    • @arkansasrebel348
      @arkansasrebel348 6 днів тому

      @@sprayarm I know that!! All modern translations use older manuscripts that were not available in the 16th and 17th centuries, except the NKJV and MEV. Edit: I am sick and tired of people are trying to demonize these translations!!

  • @brianhaley4471
    @brianhaley4471 8 днів тому

    The Church of England did not baptize infants until 1644.

  • @michael_deut6_4
    @michael_deut6_4 8 днів тому

    Here is a link to a great video that goes into the history of the Bible. It is part 1 of 3 from Adullam Films. Part 2 goes into WestCott and Hort and how the so-called "oldest" Greek manuscript was found. In case the link doesn't work the full title on UA-cam is "A Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible." ua-cam.com/video/RmXBj2N9fhY/v-deo.html

  • @johnnyvans_77
    @johnnyvans_77 8 днів тому

    KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD IM A FILIPINO AND TAGALOG BIBLE IS CORRUPTED AND GOD LEAD ME TO READ KJV BIBLE I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO PRESERVE HIS WORD BECAUSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS THE MOST SPOKEN UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE OF THIS WORLD EVEN ANY NATIONALITY READ KJV BIBLE BACAUSE KJV BIBLE IS PURE WORD PRAISE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL TRUTH PRESERVE PURE WORD, KJV IS MATHEMATICAL PERFECTION AND WITHOUT ERROR,KJV AROUND THE WORLD 🌍 🔥✝️🇮🇱🇺🇸🇦🇼🇼🇫🇻🇪🇵🇭🇪🇭🇾🇪🇹🇻🇹🇭🇹🇳🇾🇪🇪🇭🇹🇱🇹🇬🇻🇺🙌❤

  • @CarlosGilongos
    @CarlosGilongos 8 днів тому

    In the end when all believers goes to meet our Creator and our Lord and Savior, He will ask us which translation of the Bible we used? Is It really very highly most important than sharing the Gospel more? I use to read any translation even though English is not my primary native language. I even use KJV, ESV, NIV, NKJV, MKJV and my native language Filipino Tagalog. As long as I firmly believe God (Trinity) and sharing Gospel to those who does not know God and have Salvation as the Lord's last commandment "Matthew 28:19-20". This is the most problem with Christianity experts its like Calvinism vs Armenianism those will not save you or the God will ask us in the end of our lives in the last days. There are many things very important than what translation we better have to use.

  • @jonathanalfredwilson1177
    @jonathanalfredwilson1177 10 днів тому

    From time to time I find errors in the ESV. Here is an example. 1 Samuel 15:35 "And Samuel did not see Saul again until the day of his death," Just 4 chapters later there is this in 1 Samuel 19:24 "And he too stripped off his clothes, and he too prophesied before Samuel" Both statements cannot be true.

  • @johndisalvo6283
    @johndisalvo6283 10 днів тому

    ESV. Entirely Sproul Version

  • @markrenton1093
    @markrenton1093 10 днів тому

    The KJV argument is foolish because no one could read the original KJV , it had to continuously updated to suit the modern reader. If this is a matter of preference so be it but to say the KJV is superior is not true. I have often thought what person today speaks in a antiquated dialect in their daily conversations and yet at church it is the acceptable usage?

  • @classicchristianliterature
    @classicchristianliterature 10 днів тому

    ESV is good.

    • @johndisalvo6283
      @johndisalvo6283 10 днів тому

      …for toilet paper

    • @classicchristianliterature
      @classicchristianliterature 10 днів тому

      @@johndisalvo6283 you would use God’s word as toilet paper. Seems like that’s not a good thing to do for one who claims to be a Christian

  • @normmcinnis4102
    @normmcinnis4102 10 днів тому

    It's a modernized Westcott and Hort RSV. Why are "Christians" so reckless and undiscerning in today's world?

  • @Watchmanonthewall77
    @Watchmanonthewall77 10 днів тому

    I always felt like the esv was a Calvinists bible. I know many others ise it but almostall calvinist used it before the Lsb came along. KJV all the way!

    • @dannymcmullan9375
      @dannymcmullan9375 8 днів тому

      I'm Calvinist and use the KJV. The KJV translators were Calvinist.

    • @Watchmanonthewall77
      @Watchmanonthewall77 8 днів тому

      @@dannymcmullan9375 good for you! Read Gen. 18:20 and 21 and you won't be Calvinist anymore. If you can, you got some splaining to do.

  • @henrylaurel1188
    @henrylaurel1188 10 днів тому

    The irony is that the cults that deny the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit. Mormons, Christian Scientist, Jehovah Witnesses before they used their own version. All used the KJV to teach their deceptions. They could not use the more accurate modern translations. Because they are much stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. It is also the KJV only cult that attack the word of God. If the translation is not their precious KJV. Meanwhile God is using and blessing the more accurate modern translations to bring many to Christ.

  • @tedroybal5231
    @tedroybal5231 10 днів тому

    I think I remember that God was not happy with a people focused on one language. That did not turn out well.

  • @biblehistoryscience3530
    @biblehistoryscience3530 10 днів тому

    Roman Catholics used Hort to promote the Alexandrian text type family of documents to discredit Sola Scriptura because the freedom to follow God directly threatens their power to act as the middleman. It's all about power.

  • @josephgualda6177
    @josephgualda6177 10 днів тому

    👉Versions can be polluted by the enemy...In GOD’s grace is still our salvation anchored and faith in the LORD Jesus Christ. 📖 “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of GOD: not of works, lest any man should boast.” ‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭2‬:‭8‬-‭9‬ ‭KJV‬‬ 📖 “And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, PREACHING OF THE LORD JESUS. AND THE HAND OF THE LORD WAS WITH THEM: and A MGREAT NUMBER BELIEVED, AND TURNED TO THE LORD. Then tidings of these things came unto the ears of the church which was in Jerusalem: and they sent forth Barnabas, that he should go as far as Antioch. Who, when he came, AND HAD SEEN THE GRACE OF GOD, was glad, and exhorted them all, that with purpose of heart they would cleave unto the LORD.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭11‬:‭20‬-‭23‬ ‭KJV‬‬ GOD bless you more! 🙏❤️📖💪

  • @JigsawPuzzleConnection
    @JigsawPuzzleConnection 11 днів тому

    Let me phrase this another way. What is good about it? Nothing when you compare the two. Thank you for this video. More people need to hear this. We are studying this in my bible study at church. God bless. Please make videos withoug distracting music.

  • @kevinjodrey7664
    @kevinjodrey7664 11 днів тому

    ​@Beleeuer Yes. It is other late manuscripts. The original KJV had it in the margin.

  • @eclipsesonic
    @eclipsesonic 11 днів тому

    6:13 - If you're going to accuse the ESV of using "only Son" instead of "only begotten Son", then to be consistent, you're going to have to go after Tyndale's New Testament, the Coverdale Bible 1535 and the Matthew's Bible 1537 as well, since they all say "only Son" in John 3:16 too. He's God's only Son, in the sense that He has no other Son like Jesus, who has His very same nature and essence, like how a human son has the exact same nature as his human father, namely humanity; likewise, Jesus has the same nature as His Father, namely divinity, whereas we don't. Regarding the Greek word "Monogenes" in John 3:16, here's some info about it. According to the Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (BDAG, 3rd Edition), monogenes has two primary definitions. The first definition is "pertaining to being the only one of its kind within a specific relationship." This is its meaning in Hebrews 11:17 when the writer refers to Isaac as Abraham’s "only begotten son" (KJV). Abraham had more than one son, but Isaac was the only son he had by Sarah and the only son of the covenant. Therefore, it is the uniqueness of Isaac among the other sons that allows for the use of monogenes in that context. The second definition is "pertaining to being the only one of its kind or class, unique in kind." This is the meaning that is implied in John 3:16 (see also John 1:14, 18; 3:18; 1 John 4:9). John was primarily concerned with demonstrating that Jesus is the Son of God (John 20:31), and he uses monogenes to highlight Jesus as uniquely God’s Son-sharing the same divine nature as God-as opposed to believers who are God’s sons and daughters by adoption (Ephesians 1:5). Jesus is God’s “one and only” Son.

    • @alex-qe8qn
      @alex-qe8qn 10 днів тому

      You’re demanding too much logic and scholarship for this lot!

    • @eclipsesonic
      @eclipsesonic 10 днів тому

      @@johnrfrost He is, in the sense that no other son of God as His exact nature like Jesus does.

    • @alex-qe8qn
      @alex-qe8qn 9 днів тому

      @@johnrfrost “Only” here means “only one of its kind / unique” [the earliest Latin translation is “unicus”].

    • @alex-qe8qn
      @alex-qe8qn 9 днів тому

      @@johnrfrost I’m not sure that the same criticism couldn’t be made of “only-begotten”, as all the saved are sons and daughters begotten of God. The problem is, rather, modern ignorance of Biblical vocabulary. Additionally, the Bible is for believers - not that unbelievers shouldn’t read it, but study is necessary for understanding.

    • @eclipsesonic
      @eclipsesonic 9 днів тому

      @@johnrfrost Just because people can misinterpret a passage doesn't make it a wrong translation. JW's misinterpret various passages to suggest that Jesus is a created being, like in Revelation 3:14: "And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God." - KJV They interpret that to mean that Jesus was the beginning or first thing that Jehovah God created. Now, obviously they're wrong, but that doesn't make the translation wrong, it's the interpretation that's wrong.

  • @guymontag349
    @guymontag349 11 днів тому

    If the folks at Chick Tracts really want to use the original words of the Bible, then they should be printing their tracts in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek.

  • @Terrylb285
    @Terrylb285 11 днів тому

    John 3:16 God so loved the world that in 1611 he gave us the KJV that those who read it will be saved .

  • @BenjaminBreedlove
    @BenjaminBreedlove 11 днів тому

    The serpent is behind this. He attacked Eve the same way. He made Eve question what God said.

  • @ManuelPinner
    @ManuelPinner 11 днів тому

    like I said again all other Bibles that is not the authorized King James is useless trash!