Why the KJV is Irreplaceable - Manny Rodriguez
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
- What is so special about the King James Bible? Can it be replaced? Should it? In this session Pastor Manny Rodriguez gives us reasons why the KJV is the most dependable translation in the english language.
Subscribe for more videos!
Visit kjbrc.org for more information
For the soul-winner there is clear power behind the KJV. I have led 100s to the Lord with it, and am still amazed at the power it has to change the hearts of men instantly.
It’s the Bible that touches and pierces their heart, indeed. But it doesn’t have to be the KJV for that to happen. God is not so limited that he cannot save otherwise.
@@CalebDaniel-wl9hv You can use silver and claim that it is as valuable as platinum all that you want, but I will stick to the platinum of Bibles.
@@John3.36 I’ll do you one better. The KJV omits “God” in Revelation 1:8, omits “his name” in Revelation 14:1, and mistranslates 2 Peter 1:1 and obscures the deity of Christ. If the KJV is platinum, then paper is plastic.
@@CalebDaniel-wl9hv "It is an honor for a man to cease from strife: but every fool will be meddling." -- Proverbs 20:3 KJV
@@CalebDaniel-wl9hv Rev 1:8 it is not needed and changes meaning in no way! "the Almighty" makes pretty clear which "Lord"!
Revelation 14:1 the other versions added it. they came later. (Sinaiticus & Vaticanus are not 1700 years old! See David Daniels "Who Faked The World's Oldest Bible" and David Sorenson's "Neither Oldest Nor Best")
2 Peter 1:1 The King James language of 1:1 is mirrored in verse 2, by the King James and every other version. The other versions read inconsistently between the two verses. If this phrasing "obscures Christ's deity", then the modern versions are also guilty in verse 2.
KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD, AND I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE NOW TO SPREAD HIS WORD TO OTHER COUNTRIES 🔥✝️
Matthew 4:4 "But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." KJV
also Luke 4:4, Deuteronomy 8:3 .. 4+4+8 = 16, 4+4+3 = 11... 1611
Which church are true according to the Bible in this world? Because many churches are not true according to this scriptures, Matthew 7:21-23,Roman's 10;1-3,2Corintians 11:12-15,2thimoty 4:3-4,2Peter 2:1-3,and what is Christmas, Goodfriday and Easter according to the Bible?
@@capnjsWhich church are true according to the Bible in this world? Because many churches are not true according to this scriptures, Matthew 7:21-23,Roman's 10;1-3,2Corintians 11:12-15,2thimoty 4:3-4,2Peter 2:1-3,and what is Christmas, Goodfriday and Easter according to the Bible?
Which does not match word for word to the OT verse in the KJV itself from Deut. 8:13 👌
Maybe the KJV itself gives us linguistic insight into what is meant by "every word" here.. huh.
Did you know A supernova happened in the same year as KJB was commissioned? Kepler's Supernova. The 1,604th New Testament verse: Mark 13:31 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
The 16,004th verse of the Bible:
Psalm 119:105 Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
What a great presentation! Praise God. Hallelujah!
Kjv is the pure word of God🔥✝️
Amen Amen and Amen Glory to GOD !
The Truth cannot be refuted.
God bless you Brothers .
Man's truth changes , but
God's Truth does not change.
Psalm 91 : 4
4 He shall cover thee with his feathers , and under his wings shalt thou trust :
HIS TRUTH shall be thy shield and buckler.
Psalm 138 : 2
2 I will worship toward thy holy temple , and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and THY TRUTH : for thou hast magnified THY WORD above all thy name .
Jer 2:5 Thus saith the LORD, What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain? 2:11 Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit. 2:13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. 2:18 And now what hast thou to do in the way of Egypt, to drink the waters of Sihor? or what hast thou to do in the way of Assyria, to drink the waters of the river?
Did not Thomas Nelson publish the New King james version?
Rupert Murdoch owns the publishing house now that produces most new bibles. Can we say money, money, money?
@@rosemaryrojahn584 Yes! These new perversions are exactly a money thing, with another [fresh] one showing up all the time! But we’re on to them…. Acts 19:27, “…but this our CRAFT is in danger to be set at nought!” It’s their craft, that’s all. Btw, when are they ever going to get it right? Is it this one? Or do we look for another? And another…
Thank you for this edifying message about the infallible King James Bible. Many youngsters have not been taught to read proper English in context. Too many teachers in the public schools inflict juvenile students with their own militant Bibliophobia. I praise God for His great salvation by the precious blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. May the LORD richly bless you as you minister to His saints. God speed!
Chick publishing tells about Frank Logsdon regretting his work on NASB and said he was in trouble with God. It's a big deal folks.
A circumstantial case for the Comma of John: In 484 A.D. the bishop of Carthage with 400 bishops quoted the comma to an Arian Vandal king. Being the bishop of Carthage, he would have had access to the Scriptures of Cyprian, and he probably had a Vulgate, maybe a first edition. Also, Gregory Nazianzus wrote on the grammar, and he had a student named Jerome. Seems strong evidence to me. Blessings.
Also, the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7) is not in italics! Boom! Drop the mic! Amen!
I accept the Comma as pure Bible. But you need not have a KJV to have jt. The NKJV, MEV, YLT, NLV, LST, GNV, and AMP have it. Please leave the 17th century.
@@CalebDaniel-wl9hv Proverbs 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
@@jamessheffield4173 that just raises the question. In this case, who’re my fathers, and by what standard is that version the landmark? Much is here being assumed that ought rather be proved.
@@CalebDaniel-wl9hv All the Books of the New Testament, as they are commonly received, we do receive, and account them Canonical. 39 Articles of Religion All the AV scholars had to sign that they believed that. Blessings.
Amen
Amen! Great preaching and teaching brother. Aloha
They can call us fanatics if they want or ignorant. It doesn't matter. We all have to stand before God someday. May God open our eyes before that day comes.
You really think God will say "you read the wrong translation of the Bible" 😅
@@MrAndyhdz God says His Word is pure. Without error and He will preserve it forever. We are NOT to add or add take away. Do you not fear God? The experts now say we no longer have the pure inspired Word of God. Is God a liar?
@@rosemaryrojahn584 so for 1611 years Christians read the wrong Bible?
@MrAndyhdz yes and we'd be lucky if that's all he does.
@@JPH4886 poor Christians who read the wrong Bible for 1600 years and are burning in hell over it. It's a good thing You're special to be born after.
Nice work, Brother. It’s God the Holy Spirit-superintended King James Version ALONE that brings fallen, sinful men under conviction, because it is the very Word of God. All other “Bibles” are watered down, New Age Versions.
What does Superintended mean?
@@silversilk8438 It means that God the Holy Spirit providentially oversaw the work. That is why the King James Version may be considered to be the very Word of God -- perfect, pure, and inerrant.
@@chrismcmorrow9738 Oh! Thank you! I say it's true in that god made sure the translators translated it correctly, and that the text they were translating was perfectly preserved, and that what was perfectly preserved was the divinely inspired Word of God as conveyed and handed-down from centuries past. I was reading Dr. Phil Stringer's _The Unbroken Bible,_ and he was saying he doesn't believe the KJV has been re-inspired, and I also don't think it has... I think all the cool 7s and number stuff pointed out by channels like "Trust is Christ" is not because the text was re-inspired, but absolutely because God oversaw the translation just as He oversaw the preservation, just as He oversaw that what was written down was precisely the Words He wanted to be written. I really like this about God, because if God's Word hadn't been trustworthily conveyed to us in our time, we would have no assurance or knowledge of what God wanted us to know and believe and obey (love one another!).
Preach it brother, Preach it!
Amen and Amen! ❤
Does the Greek of ACTS 19:37 say Church's or TEMPLES ???
It says neither! Those are both English words! ἱεροσύλους only occurs once in the Bible, right there in Acts 19:37!
From Orthodox Christian Info Center: "The Greek word for Temple, "Naos," [ναός] actually means house. This reminds us that the early Christians, under persecution, worshipped in houses, when necessary."
From Orthodox outlet for Dogmatic Enquiries: "The words "church" and "temple", in this case are interchangeable; however, the term “church” (Greek: εκκλησία) is far more common in English. The term "temple" (Greek: ναός) is also commonly applied to larger churches."
The form ἱεροσύλους matches neither ναός nor εκκλησία ... a strange translation hill to die on to be sure!
Perhaps more interestingly, TRs (Beza 1598) say "your" (υμων) goddess, while CTs say "our" (ἡμῶν) goddess! Yikes!
HAPPY SABBATH DAY, SUNSET IN TEXAS 8:40 FRIDAY UNTIL SUNSET SATURDAY,
SHALOM
Amen!
Happy Sabbath
I prefer the first printing 1611 he bible over the 1769
But either way it's not going away
Even nasb translator Frank Logsdon regretted his work and repented and pleaded everyone before he died to stick with the king james Bible
Where can I read of this? I am working on a sermon about the superiority of the KJV and I would love to use that quote
@@ClayOfTheMasterRead “The Fourfold Superiority of the King James Version,” by D. A. Waite. (See ABE Books for used copy.)
@@robertscofield7845 Thank you very much.
This was great!!!
The codex Sinaiticus was not centuries old but was produced in 1838 by Constantine Simon Simoneedes and was not waiting to be burned since Monks kept manuscripts in baskets. Manny, do read the books you recommended as they will inform you about this and other important facts.
Id like to see evidence of that, chapter and verse. Manny isnt the only teacher that said that Sinaiaticus was waiting to be burned. Regardless any edition produced from it is a flawed and useless for profit translation.
@@fredost1504 Hi Fred, the critical text is corrupt and the Sinaiticus a fraud no doubt. The KJB is the the pure word of God The best which I use.
@@fredost1504 check out David W. Daniels/ Chick Tracts ... He has done the research and absolutely has a number of videos about the critical text and the received text.
@@fredost1504 Yes, you are correct. The issue at hand is the purity of the Holy Scriptures, and it has nothing to do with dynamic equivalence regardless of language. The inerrant King James Bible is the Old and New Testaments, preserved by the LORD in their entirety and therefor infallible in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. The credible forensic evidence documenting the death, burial and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ speaks for itself to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit on earth and in heaven also. QED.
The monks themselves called Tischendorf a liar and said his account never happened. Later Tischendorf conspired with some Russians to steal more of the pages. 🤷♂️ The real author came forward and he had witnesses that said he’d shown them the mss he’d written.
Amen 🙏 and Amen
The existence of the Sinaiticus proof of God's superior sense of humor. Tischendorf claims he saved it out of "a waste basket". God let us know from the very beginning that the Critical Text as a whole is nothing but garbage fit only for a trash can.
Praise the Lord for giving us His eternal word in the English language, the King James Bible. In Jesus's name, amen.
But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.
1 Peter 1 : 25
Yes, without question the KJV of Bible is not equal too but superior to the originals for one simple reason, nobody has an original today. To accept Originals argument only means you can not trust your KJV of Bible, and that is all they want too as it will shut you up!
The message I'm posting now will implicate many KJV-only ministries, but for the sake of professing Christians stuck in cults (such as SDA/JW/LDS), I will highlight the biggest problem with KJV: it is based on the hebrew Masoretic Text whose authors changed God's word.
2 Tim. 2:15 has been used to justify a *very dangerous* heresy, which is Dualism (god of OT/flesh=bad, god of NT/spirit=good). The verse actually refers to Gen. 4:7 of the Septuagint, and the english translation reads:
"Hast thou not sinned if thou hast brought it rightly, but not rightly divided it? be still, to thee shall be his submission, and thou shalt rule over him. (Gen. 4:7 LXX)"
The KJV is still good for the NT (which even the Greek Orthodox Church borrows heavily from), but when it comes to the OT, virtually _all_ english translations are based upon the corrupted Masoretic Text, so the Septuagint is the authoritative Scripture.
P.S. That also means Christians shouldn't get woozy over rabbinic esotericism about jumping letters, gematria, etc. Because the original Scripture had been tampered with, it may all be contrived.
P.P.S. The original Hebrew sources for the Septuagint are allegedly lost, funny how that works.
You are twisting up scripture to say whatever you want it to say. Two Timothy 2:15 in the King James Bible talks about studying to show yourself worthy, rightly dividing the word of God. This applies to students, to handle the word diligently. God has told us in the book of revelation, and throughout his great book, that those who add or take away from this book, they have their part taken away out of the book of life, and out of the new city, new Jerusalem. Jerome in letter 112 says, "]) was agreeable to the Hebrew, but so is not the Greek copy now extant, which is full of corruptions, and seemeth to be a mixed and confused translation of many."
"If the 70, as well as the Hebrew, had been authentical, the Lord would have been careful to have kept it pure and uncorrupt unto our days, as well as he hath done the Hebrew." There is indeed a Greek edition extant, which goeth under the name of the 70, but Whitaker sayeth that the true 70 is lost, and that this which we now have is mixed and miserably corrupted."
@@coltonmorrison4616 You should study Romans chapter 7 then.
References to the Septuagint were made throughout the NT, even by the Lord Jesus Christ. You will find the relevant resources on the internet by searching terms such as "Jesus quoting Septuagint". The Septuagint greek text has also been proven to be authentic after the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. ✌️
What about the KJVER? I have never heard of it...neither have I heard of the SKJV.
This is an ongoing argument among Christians. Many people who go to evangelical or even fundamental Christian churches use all these “modern” versions. But they have many problems like missing verses, changed doctrines, etc., but say it’s no big deal. As a reaction, we who stick with the Old Veteran, the King James Bible, are vilified with the label, KJV-er, or some other label. Hope that explains a little. We say we already had a good English Bible, these new ones are interlopers or unnecessary, but there is a sinister agenda behind it all. We resist therefore, and stay loyal to the old Standard! Amen!
I have seen the KJVER in a Christian book store, and I don't know mich about it. But I already know the KJB is perfect, so whatever the KJVER "updates" in the translation, I already know it will not be perfect. But perhaps someone should look into it and see exactly what has been changed.
THE KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE IS VERY ACTIVE,
REVELATION 2:17, I RECEIVED A WHITE STONE, IT JUST MYSTERIOUSLY APPEARED IN MY KJV BIBLE, SHALOM
JOHN 14:26, 14:6, 3:3-5, THEN REPENT OF YOUR SINS,
✝️🌹🕊GOD BLESS ALL SHALOM
Maybe you should consider some real scholars and remove the blinders.
Numbers 3:14-51. Were there 22,000 Levites as stated in v.39, or 22,300 according to v.v. 22, 28, and 34? If 22,300 then having the Israelites (numbered 22,273) pay 5 shekels at 273 more than 22,000, then seems unnecessary, yea incorrect. Please address this concern.
Please explain your confusion. The number 22, 300 contains 22, 000 by definition. Revelation is progressive in both the Old and New Testaments. No further explanation of Numbers 3 is required. QED.
@@jjpetkusiii ...thank you, that explanation was as clear as mud. So, what about the 22,273 Israelites? Why the payment of 5 shekels for the 273 since 22,300 contains 22,273?
No, "@@PTL4OSAS" your confusion arises from asking the wrong question to begin with. No further payment is necessary. The handwriting of the ordinances that were against was abolished at Calvary. The Lord Jesus Christ is the Prince of Peace, and the Saviour averred the Hebrew Tanakh as a documented matter of immutable fact. QED.
Good question. This isn’t incorrect, it is called rounding. When numbering the Levites, they rounded to the nearest hundred for each of the three family groups, and then when they added them together they rounded to the nearest thousand. All that to say that they followed rules of rounding to come to the number 22,000 Levites. Then when numbering the firstborns of the rest of the Israelites, they didn’t round. It sets a good example for us, when giving to the Lord based on a percentage (such as a tithe), it is good to round the numbers in a way that allow you to give more to God. It easier math if you round them, and if you are a cheerful giver, you have no problem giving the little bit more that rounding will produce.
So it is not incorrect, it was just the choice of what got rounded and what didn’t provided an example of how to give.
All that said, that is not a translation issue, which is what the video was about. Even the modern versions have the same numbers in all of those verses mentioned. Since God promised to preserve His Word, and all the versions I looked at have the same numbers, then if God is true, those must be the numbers that the originals had.
“Let God be true, but every man a liar.” - Rom. 3:4
@@jmcollison10 thank you for that insightful response. I can see now in Numbers chaps. 1, 2, and 4 it appears that rounding was surely used because there's little chance that every tribe, et. al. would be so evenly numbered. And yes, God does want us to be cheerful and faithful givers! Blessings to you my brother!
Which textus receptus? There's more than one. How many different words are you ok with? Are you ok with "God forbid" when neither God nor forbid are in the Greek text at all?
Not really. "God forbid" is and was idiomatic English. The infallible King James Bible preserves the New Testament in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. I hope that this helps you.
@@jjpetkusiii Corn!!!!
There is and was nothing to debate here. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away" (Mark 13 : 31). Everlasting salvation from sin by grace through faith in Him alone testifies of His eternal holiness. The only-begotten Son of God is the Prince of Peace, and the Saviour averred the Hebrew Tanakh consistently as a documented matter of immutable fact. Moreover, the Triune Godhead is represented in both the Old and New Testaments. The fulfillment of prophecy confirms the veracity of the Gospel that speaks for itself over the millennia, and revelation has always been progressive. The operation of the Holy Spirit is exposited conclusively in the Pauline epistles. Solid evidence based on more than 5,000 extant manuscripts established the integrity of the inerrant King James Bible that unfailingly records the infallible Holy Scriptures and has been attesting the death, burial and Resurrection of the Messiah in English long before C. R. Darwin succumbed to his various diseases in 1882.
We understand that you want us to call you "@@GradyRisley " on UA-cam videos that exposit the infallibility of the inerrant King James Bible in Modern English. No further explanation of cobs that you may or may not have eaten today is required. QED
@jjpetkusiii ? I don't care what ya call me as long as it's not " late for dinner".???
Corn! Corn! Is all I have to say. Corn!
The Word of God is/was Yeshua. Replace that with words on paper and you've made yourself an idol... I don't care the translation but it most definitely includes king Jimmy's.
Right. And I think they recognize that distinction, although they are not consistent with it, since they're elevating a translation to perfect status.
@@Bluevulcan1881 Good point. The Israelites made golden calf to represent YHWH. But it was still an Idol!
What external evidence is there that the KJV is an infallible translation? The argumentation here seems to be begging the question and circular reasoning.
are you qualified to translate a Greek or Hebrew text, into the English language? If not, you really are just navel gazing. More than 5,000 manuscripts seems pretty solid proof.
@@maryseaman312 Yes, you are correct. It is very sad that so many people have not learned to read proper English in context. No factual error in the infallible King James Bible has ever been proven.
Popular surveys prove nothing about the infallible texts of the Old and New Testaments that the inerrant King James Bible preserves in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. Polling the opinions of students is irrelevant to absolute objective truth and historical facts per se. No factual error in the Authorized Verson has ever been demonstrated. That is reason enough for anyone. QED.
To put it simply, militant Bibliophobia is neither more nor less than the pathological denial of the Lord God omnipotent. There is no reason at all to doubt the infallibility of the inerrant King James Bible in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. Popular surveys prove nothing about historical facts or absolute objective truth. QED.
One really good external evidence is shared in this video, which is the fruit of the translation. Before the deluge of modern translations, there was great fruit and revivals centered around the King James Bible throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. Now in the past century, thanks to these modern translations and textual criticism, there is nothing but doubt and disagreement and bad fruit. There has not been mass revival in the English-speaking world since all these competing versions came out, and it is because there is no blessing of God upon them.
If there is another real revival, not these fake ones that are organized on campuses like the Asbury Revival that fizzled out, then it will absolutely be centered on the King James Bible.
God bless, my friend.
Thy word is very pure: therefore thy servant loveth it.
Psalm 119 : 140
(Sorry for the VERY, VERY long "comment". But I believe it NEEDS to be espoused).
Kind Sirs...it's said, "KJV is Irreplaceable!". Well, what "Vision" are you talking about? Huh? IE: the First KJV was published in 1611 AD. And had 80 books. Oh indeed! And that lasted 274 yrs, until 1885 AD. When they kicked out; 14 Apocrypha books of the KJV books! And their Translator's; corrected untold errors; in the 1st KJV. From Gen to Rev!
And that lasted 97 yrs; until 1982 AD NKJV ("New King James version"); where they removed; over one million words. That should't have never been there, in the 1st place. IE: But, King James demanded to his Translators; to USE the words of a Queen 1. Like this: Ye vs You; and thy vs yours; Believeth vs Believe; and Amongst vs Among; and untold others, from Gen to Rev!
And get this Brethren...Jesus' name was NOT in the 1st KJV! Because there was NOT English words as yet. So it was name "Iesus"! And that did not happen until 1638 AD for "Jesus"! These changes are called "minor" changes.
And just the recent; the 1885 AD NKJV is already been changed again. It's called NKJV (1995 AD). And it's the BEST way to understand any Bible. Oh yes! Try it. It's Awesome! And I Praise Jesus' Holy Name!
Now if any one doubts the above....do the research! It took me 16 yrs. So,, my question is: WHICH KJV version is "Irreplaceable"? Thus,, I rest me case...
...In any case Kind Sir and Brethren, Please Pray OFTEN and Praise Jesus OFTEN; for He is the ONLY true "God Almighty"; there will ever have been. And may Jesus bless you and yours always. AMEN!
Popular surveys prove nothing about the infallible texts of the Old and New Testaments that the inerrant King James Bible preserves in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. Polling the opinions of students is irrelevant both to absolute truth and historical facts per se. No one has ever demonstrated a factual error in the Authorized Version. I hope that this helps.
@@jjpetkusiii Errors have been demonstrated countless times. When you don't "want" to see it; and are willing to go to any length to justify an error, it will not be seen.
I could take any book on earth and make it "infallible". It goes like this: no one can describe a cow well enough that someone can't come along and say it's a horse!
No, you came up short again. Your logical fallacies as to infallibility prove nothing. So now you want us to believe that "@@DixieDee " is your real name. We have all the credible forensic evidence about the Lord Jesus Christ and the historicity of the inerrant King James Bible that we need. QED.
Nobody is trying to replace the KJV, except certain scholars
But most of TR support is to help the reader without insulting the text
Many lost people viciously attack the infallible King James Bible because they hate God with all their desperately wicked hearts. The Vatican has always opposed it, and so would many disciples of the Darwinian heretics replace it with their corrupt mistranslations of the wrong texts. I hope that this helps you forever.
42:09 It’s not only modern version advocates who have trouble with archaic and obsolete words in the KJV. The King James Bible Study Project polled 100 KJV pastors on readability issues. The results were released last October.
Popular surveys prove nothing about the infallible texts of the Old and New Testaments that the inerrant King James Bible preserves in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. Polling the opinions of students is irrelevant both to absolute truth and historical facts per se. No one has ever demonstrated a factual error in the Authorized Version. I hope that this helps.
@@jjpetkusiii This wasn't an opinion poll. UA-cam doesn't allow comments with links, but if you Google "King James Bible Study Project", you should find it.
@@CalebRichardson I agree with you about UA-cam. Your response to my posted reply (may or) may not have been sent to me. Google is the parent company (i. e. owner of) UA-cam. No offense is intended, but there is no reason to trust either of them. No factual error in the Lord Jesus Christ or His word, the inerrant King James Bible, has ever been proven. I hope that this helps.
1 John 5:7
Comma Johannum (1John5:7) is not in italics. If the KJV Translators added, or doubted a word or phrase, they printed it in italics. That was their agreed upon convention. Very consistent throughout. So they had no reason to italicize 1John 5:7. Amen!
@@robertscofield7845 that’s because erasmus has given a false Greek manuscript and was under heavy scrutiny. And also never included it in his first 2 editions. So why wasn’t it in the first two?
"@@keithwilson9172 " You forgot to tell us what your native tongue is, but we already know that it was not Biblical Hebrew or Koine Greek. For more details, please refer to John 3: 16 along with 1 Corinthians 15: 1-4 and Hebrew 1: 1-3 in the New Testament of the infallible King James Bible. Then you can be properly scrutinized.
@@jjpetkusiii it appears that you are assuming I do not believe in the trinity? Is that your assumption?
In fact, "@@keithwilson9172 " that was just your assumption. You did not refer to John 3 : 16. You forgot to mention 1 Corinthians 15 and Hebrews 1 as they are attested in the infallible King James Bible. No further explanation of your criticisms is necessary. QED.
Please buy copy of Douay Rheims. English language Bible that predates King James and may be even better.
The issue at hand is the purity of the Holy Scriptures, and it has nothing to do with "fanaticism" regardless of language. The inerrant King James Bible is the Old and New Testaments, preserved by the LORD in their entirety and therefor infallible in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. The credible forensic evidence documenting the death, burial and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ speaks for itself to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit on earth and in heaven also. QED.
Wasn’t that the one only “produced” to counter-reformation the effects of the popularity (among Protestants…) of the then new Geneva (Calvin) version circulating in England and English speaking enclaves on the Continent?
@@robertscofield7845 Thank you for your insightful reply. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "I and my Father are one" (John 10 : 30). Everlasting salvation from sin by grace through faith in Him alone testifies of his eternal holiness. The only-begotten Son of God is the Prince of Peace, and the Saviour averred the Hebrew Tanakh consistently as a documented matter of immutable fact. There was and is nothing to debate here. Solid evidence based on more than 5, 000 extant manuscript established the integrity of the infallible King James Bible that unfailingly attested the death, burial and Resurrection of the Messiah long before C. R. Darwin succumbed to his various diseased in 1882. The historicity of Noah's Flood is well beyond legitimate dispute, and the fulfillment of prophecy confirms the veracity of the Gospel that continues to speak for itself over the millennia. We understand that the Triune Godhead is represented in both the Old and New Testaments, and revelation has always been progressive. The operation of the Holy Spirit is exposited conclusively in the Pauline epistles. That is the pertinent data that revisionist proponents of militant Bibliophobia hate to see. Their denial is palpable, and the "modern" versions just rehash the corrupted parchments of the so-called "Critical Text." God speed!
@@robertscofield7845 There was no doubt about that. You are correct, and I thank for your diligence. God speed!
@@robertscofield7845 No. There were many reasons to produce the Douay Rheims Bible. Remember, it predates the King James Bible. Both are extremely powerful.
Christ Jesus is the solution for your salvation and eternal life in paradise by and threw His finished works. The helper he sends us to deposit and seal us in Christ Jesus. The Truth, the Faith, Hope and Love unconditionally and the Grace he has shown that is sufficient for Salvation By Faith alone. The gospel of grace delivered by God for his purpose and glory to point to Christ Jesus our Savior. The King James version wonderful hanging in there. Greek versions Hebrew versions that the KJV Bible imitates as the version's after the KJV. Personally can't understand the English language From that period it's a barrier removed by the versions that this period and my location uses. Grateful for all versions that points to Christ Jesus and his finished works for Salvation in his finished works threw Faith by grace alone.. KJV Bible...Show no personal favoritism or devalue. God has shown no personal favoritism. Another topic for foolish quarrels division and personal perseption perspective view. That's it..Christ Jesus and his spirit of truth he sends us to guide,comfort, confirm the Truth. Eternal..King James version.. Not so much.. Be wise and invest in Jesus and his spirit of truth eternity..Not wise to Trust temporal material ❤
You forgot to tell us what your native tongue is, but we already know that is it is not Biblical Hebrew or Koine Greek. Salvation by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone testifies of His eternal holiness regardless of language. I hope that this helps you.
YA.Thxs..Much condensed version By you.❤
I appreciate your prompt reply "@@user-xg4ij5uk7u ," as well as your cordial emoji. The issue at hand is the purity of the infallible Holy Scriptures. I praise God for His great salvation in the precious blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. For more details, you may refer to John 3:16 along with 1 Corinthians 15 : 1-4 and Hebrews 1 : 1-3. as it is found in the New Testament of the inerrant King James Bible.
No Condemnation for Us on the in Christ Jesus and all things are permissible for me.. Certain things are beneficial and profitable. You are putting together a strong case to justify your opinions and validate your account on the subject of the values of the KJV. Based on a great many thing's that convict or you experienced in life. Influence of others and the childhood, adolescent years that formed much of the values priorities vision investment and priority for Your position and the efforts of establishing and maintaining these convictions. Glad you have the Truth about Christ Jesus and our depraved condition as a reason for a Savior and his grace For Salvation. Doesn't get any purer than a Holy Rightous Almighty God Namely Christ Jesus. Found in All Scripture from the get go. Ask for help and surrender to the calling and gift's invitation from God for Salvation by grace threw Faith. Intellectual Human perspective on anything..Subject to cross examination and disection a fresh perspective.. Your evaluation of and the evidence presented respect.. Definitely not the final authority you have presented to be. These 3 things remain Faith Hope and Love.. Love the greatest compliment of the New testament gifted me as a elementary school student. Praise Jesus..Need a translator 😂❤
Not exactly as you described it. The issue at hand is the purity of the infallible Holy Scriptures. I praise God for His great salvation in the precious blood of the Lord Jesus Christ alone. For more details, please refer to John 3: 16 along with 1 Corinthians 15 : 1-4 and Hebrews 1 : 1-3 in the New Testament of the inerrant King James Bible. I hope that this helps you.
@@jjpetkusiii No worries.. Christ Jesus Crucified Christ Jesus risen.. That's the foundation we are building on... I Hope you enjoy your weekend and The gospel of grace. God bless Brother ✌️
Not all things are permissible so don’t twist scripture to condone lawlessness. Dan 7:25 only the AntiChrist does this
@@philmiska7295 1 Cor.7:12..Pray that you grow up more and more in the Knowledge of God's grace in Christ Jesus..His grace fuels the power to make the most of the freedom of being mastered by The Sinfull Nature and the curse of the Law's and commands under the Old covenant. Anyways Christ Jesus Crucified Christ Jesus risen.. We can agree on this.. Everything else becomes utterly meaningless apart from that ❤️
@@philmiska7295 oops sorry 1 Cor 6:12..Getto phone no Spell check ✌️🤓
King James **VERSION** is what they call the Scriptures. That’s all you need to know.
The issue at hand is the purity of the Holy Scriptures, and that has nothing to do with dynamic equivalence regardless of language. The inerrant King James Bible is the Old and New Testament, preserved by the LORD in their entirety and therefor infallible in the lingua franca of our contemporary world. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Heaven and earth shall pass way: but my words shall not pass away" (Mark 13 :31). The credible forensic evidence documenting His death, burial and Resurrection speaks for itself to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit on earth and in heaven also.
Kjv is just a translation in English. There are many in other languages that are better and more closer to the original texts.
Better & closer ?
Which translation do you suggest ?
Please list where we can read the ORIGINAL texts so we can compare
KJV is not JUST a translation in English. It is the most doctrinal sound translation.
Is it not interesting to you that Christians spend 100 times more energy attacking the KJV as opposed the NWT???? Why is that? Because most of the modern translations almost perfectly align with the NWT.
Every single verse or word that people say was inaccurately translated in the KJV, those same verses are amazingly found to be "accurately" rendered in the NWT, as well. And those several MISSING verses of modern translations are also missing in the NWT.
@@ClayOfTheMaster I'm a KJV fan.
Gal 2:7 is a great example why.
Most 'new' Bible write Gospel TO.
KJV and other olds write Gospel OF.
BIG significant difference !!!
Amen, brother.
In your KJV, please look up: Acts 16:7, 2 Peter 1:1, Revelation 1:8; 14:1; 15:3; 16:5. The KJV OMITS “of Jesus”, mistranslates a key verse on Christ’s deity, OMITS “God”, OMITS “his name”, CHANGES “nations” to “saints”, and CHANGES “Holy One” to “shalt be”. The KJV IS NOT PERFECT. Bury it, get back in your Time Machine, and return to the 21st century already. Thanks.