Відео

Laughably bad video. You don't understand the concept at all.

Sources: www.researchgate.net/publication/374166592_Problematic_P~rnography_Use_Can_It_Be_Accurately_Measured_via_the_Problematic_P~rnography_Use_Scale www.researchgate.net/publication/348252394_Roles_of_Religiosity_Obsessive-Compulsive_Symptoms_Scrupulosity_and_Shame_in_Self-Perceived_P~rnography_Addiction_A_Preregistered_Study www.researchgate.net/publication/351846515_P~rnography_and_Romantic_Relationships_A_Qualitative_Examination_of_Individual_Experiences www.researchgate.net/publication/342961287_P~rnography_use_and_romantic_relationships_A_dyadic_daily_diary_study www.myjewishlearning.com/article/gambling/ www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.24b.6?lang=bi www.sefaria.org/Mishnah_Sanhedrin.3.3?lang=bi

I don't think that 'prom' in itself is a problem - it is like many things in life... mobile phones for example. They are great... except when people are exploited and forced into quasi-slavery to mine the minerals and rare metals needed for their construction. Or when people are addicted to their phones. 'Prom' is a problem because of the abuses in the industry, the racist stereotypes that are reinforced, and the way in which performers are looked down upon by the very hypocrites who consume the material. Unfortunately, like most topics nowadays, balanced arguments looking at the pros and cons are shouted down by the extremists on both sides.

Really great video! Seeing this one after the child gambling video almost felt like an M. Night Shyamalan level reveal.

Th feminist is so strong a man can harm the feminist by looking the wrong way. Stronger still, by looking at someone else the wrong way. Even stronger still, looking at an image the wrong way. And there is only one way for a male to look, of course.

Comment

when women accuse men of an instinct of subjugation, they only project. Popper was right about Freud, although the Austrian would have been shocked about how bad his ideas were later implemented.

Firstly, I enjoyed the video, the format of this video, and I greatly enjoyed all of the goat footage. However, there are two things that I think could be improved. this format of video greatly benefits from three-point lighting (or at least two-point lighting). In my amateur opinion, I think you only have a key light, leading to the overexposure/color balance issues in the video. Two, I'm a little out-of-the-loop regarding the impetus for this video. I did see a few videos on UA-cam a while back concerning gatcha games, maybe this is concerning the same thing? A little bit of background info about what led to the creation of this video would be great. Along those same lines, I wish you would include the sources for the facts you cite as part of the script. I did notice numbers in the right hand corner, so maybe you intended to include them. My apologies if this is in the pinned comment. I can't see it so I'm not sure what is there. Sorry for the book, but I figure engagement is never a bad thing. Again, really enjoying the channel and I look forward to your next video!

The resources - talking to people about gambling: www.gambleaware.nsw.gov.au/for-professionals/for-teachers-and-youth-workers/free-classroom-resources Sources: 1. www.mass.gov/info-details/teens-gambling-its-a-risk 2. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019046/ 3. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803266/#b1-sar-7-003 4. www.statista.com/outlook/amo/online-gambling/worldwide#revenue 5. www.researchgate.net/publication/362578950_Who_gambles_and_who_experiences_gambling_problems_in_Canada 6. www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeffrey-Derevensky/publication/244915585_Child_and_Adolescent_Gambling_Behavior_Current_Knowledge/links/5ea19b9592851c87d1ad7b8c/Child-and-Adolescent-Gambling-Behavior-Current-Knowledge.pdf 7. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2533814/ 8. responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/documents/16/gen-bet-has-gambling-gatecrashed-our-teens_SIPh7sd.pdf 9. www.researchgate.net/publication/275971279_Gambling 10. www.researchgate.net/publication/228352378_The_Social_and_Economic_Impacts_of_Gambling 11. www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(24)00126-9/fulltext 12. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893944/ 13. www.researchgate.net/profile/Viorel-Lupu/publication/221814962_Gambling_Prevention_Program_Among_Children/links/577b583f08ae213761c9cd19/Gambling-Prevention-Program-Among-Children.pdf 14. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10378744/ 15. www.researchgate.net/publication/380969812_Too_Young_to_Gamble_Long-term_Risks_from_Underage_Gambling 16. www.researchgate.net/publication/368565389_Recommendations_for_parents_and_caregivers_of_children_at_risk_of_gambling_in_light_of_systematic_review_of_literature 17. www.ygam.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Annual-Student-Gambling-Survey-2024.pdf 18. www.researchgate.net/publication/313828645_Factors_that_influence_children's_gambling_attitudes_and_consumption_intentions_Lessons_for_gambling_harm_prevention_research_policies_and_advocacy_strategies 19. www.researchgate.net/publication/350331760_The_gamblification_of_digital_games 20. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904496/ 21. www.researchgate.net/publication/26655538_Gambling_Gambling_Activities_and_Problem_Gambling 22. link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10899-021-10066-7.pdf

Another question: would it trouble you to see the streets of D.C running ankle deep in blood? Yes or No.

You would love Sweden! But I agree that many of my opinions doesn’t add up. Why is no politician advocating common sense?

3rd wave feminism creates 4th rate women with a 5th grade mentality

I appreciate the transparency, however I have doubts that this won't become a political channel, only on the basis that seemingly most topics either by their nature, or just due to the hyper-politicization of current affairs, are/will become political. Not necessarily a bad thing, just that I think that statement might prove itself to be untrue.

In Film Theory, not psychology, the Male Gaze is not just camera angles. The camera angles, slowly panning up the woman's body and cutting away to closeups of her appealing feminine features, are the cinematography. The plot devices that use the female characters as objects to be acted upon rather than characters who take action can be seen in a lot of old films. However, the best old films did not have boring objects for female characters. Scarlet O'Hara took action, Dorthy set off down the yellow brick road. The Male Gaze was just poor, misogynistic, film making. Not unlike the poor, misandrist film making we have today. Setting aside a few exceptions, like King Kong, films with boring female leads are just not very good.

Can you post a link to the test you took?

So you can't trust corporations but don't trust Government with money? Doublethink much.

Pretty lady talks at camera about politics.

Heterosexual men aren't real people. They only exist to serve women. That's why men aren't supposed to have wants, preferences or expectations of their own. Likewise, a man should only feel desire when a woman feels it's appropriate, and then of course he should spring to attention immediately.

Is there also white gaze?

It's certainly up there - I keep picturing a pair of eyes with zappy Beams of Male shooting out, like Scott in X-Men. But "internalized misogyny" is the best pseudo-science psychobabble bullshit idea. I don''t have internalized misogyny. Because it's imaginary. What I do have is equal opportunity intolerance for stupidity.

First: "The male gaze" is just a term misandrists use to DEMONIZE the sexuality of heterosexual men. Second: You believe that feminism is "all people should have the same rights"? That is NOT what feminism is about. Feminism is not about equality - it's about women getting special privileges and favoritisms from the government, at the expense of men. The real philosophy that spouses that all human beings have the same rights to life, liberty and property, is called libertarianism.

They act like the "gaze" is one-sided too. Men get objected as well. I still remember an episode of The Fairly Odd Parents, where when the main character was turned into a girl and saw a comic book shop, and wondered if, now as a girl, she/he still liked comics, and thought "Hmm, muscular guys in spandex fighting crime. Oooh!" Is that not a prime example of female gaze objectifying men?

Looking for a husband?

I don't know why this video came up in my feed but I can say as someone who has hearing loss and tinnitus, the fact that you speak so clearly and enunciate your words so well, has made this a very easy video to enjoy. And it was an interesting video to boot. The list of sources was a nice touch. I like someone who does their research in order to help with the context of their subject.

Do mirrors have male gaze?

I'm pretty familiar with feminist theory and the idea that feminists take Sigmund Freud's work without a pinch of salt is frankly laughable. The "male gaze" is a structural element of cinematic language that's basically impossible to ignore, all you can do is attempt to rationalise it's presence and naturalise the conditions that lead to it's construction. That's not really particularly critical or scientifically rigorous, so it's no wonder that the wider point of operant conditioning under patriarchy is lost in this flawed analysis; dismissed as some neurotic figment of the collective feminist imagination. All that this video has established is that some women also participate in patriarchy and naturalise mysogynistic ideas. That's not exactly a big surprise considering this video itself is doing exactly that with these half-baked ideas that only appeal to insecure men desperate for validation after being called out on their unacceptable behaviour. Just look at the rest of the comment section here to all of the male chauvinists and pickmes trying desperately to get their approval, this is just a pseudo-intellectual version of the kind of lowest common denominator content you see all over YT and Tik Tok. Really not very impressive at all.

The entire idea of "male gaze" is a cover for feminist misandry.

Nice bit of intellectual nutrition

If you banned the male gaze, women would never get laid. It sure ain't their personality that's attractive.

I remember an interview from a few years ago where Camille Paglia said nice things about Mulvey, but also that "Gaze Theory" is stupid and that anyone who believes in it has no idea how art works. It might have been one where she was talking with Christina Hoff Sommers. I haven't got Camille's expertise, but I always thought the idea of the "camera" that feminists were complaining about was often showing the audience how something - man, woman, coffee cup...whatever - is meant to be viewed in the story. Good cinematography is like a language, it seems to me, so the irony is that a lot of those feminist complaints, if heeded, could lead to devaluing of female characters, because the camera wouldn't be allowed to tell us about them.

Getting the courts to award child support and not allowing the father to see his children is the worst one. Women do commit SA

back in the day,warlords etc had lots of wives. Genghis Khan is said to be a forebear of 1/4 (?) of today's Mongolians. and to this day, woman offer themselves to disgusting rich men (TRUMP). But i don't think it describes everyone. I have known married couples who are very egalitarian, and i tend to have friendships w women more than sexual.

I can't count how many times I've cringed and/or gritted my teeth whenever I've heard the words "male gaze". The idea is so profoundly idiotic, it makes my head hurt. 😖

You don't have to be feminist to believe in gender equality any more than you have to be a white supremecist to believe in racial equality.

I mean..it makes sense for the corn thing. Men watch it the woman and think - "I want to do this to her" , women watch the woman coz they imagine themselves to be her. Its not so different just reverse for superhero movies. Men watch it and think - I want to be him. Women watch it and think - I want to be with someone like him.

The whole male gaze thing is another proof that feminism is just a form of neuroses. And idea that objectification is degrading is a Puritan heritage that considers sex dirty, but like with everything feminism uses it and twists it in one specific angle that makes no sense; Find me a man who would mind being objectified by women, and if we should all be equal women shouldn't mind either, right? But we are not. That twisting of reality creates endless contradictions in feminism that could easily be explained if creators of it finished sixth grade biology. Men will always objectify women if they find them attractive, same as they would stare in those women if it was not socially awkward. Again, same biology for kids explains why. But normal men never act on their basic impulses towards unknown women where there is no consent, in same way they don't stare like freaks because its socially unacceptable. Feminism pushes basic instincts of humans as animals in social frame and then condemns it which is ludicrous.

LOL. Right, how many married couples have you known where the man is dominant? I know of none and I am 78, at least in America.

Theres an early feminist story called venus in furs. At the beginning the 2 are having a conversation and he says a mans role is desire and a womans role is to be desired. They test this philosophy and by then end conclude that they had a lot of foolish beliefs.

"I would like to be that person's friend" "help, police, im being oppressed"

If that theory was true then it should be the natural state of things. That means feminists are unnatural and should stop.

6:37 women who commit SA are responsible for SA they commited. With exceptions being forced under duress but that goes without saying. The English language is sometimes so vague huh. You weren't talking about those women to begin with.

You find it on any level from the small social group to nations intelligence and spying. Information is power and gossiping is trading of information. It is probably, but not certainly, more present in societies will high social control like religious ones. I see it as a kind of verbally fighting adversaries or a kind of verbal violence. It is also how mobbing is performed. The Swedish sociologist Af Klintberg that looked into ”travelling stories” that are retold but when you try to find the origin it often is circular. A famous one is ”the rat in the pizza”. It is about some people eating a pizza at an Italian restaurant and one find a bone in the pizza. When the bone is shown to a biologist he tells that it is from a rat. Noone can tell where this story originated but it is really well spread.

Very few brands of feminism suggest that men have an inherent need to subjugate women. A learnt one, via male socialisation, is more often. This is simply a strawman.

Good report.

That was fun and informative. Thank you.

Love the old footage from the Rear window. Grace Kelly was worthy of the male gaze....

I mean that it is about the reality of science. If we believe in science ECT works but we don’t know why. If we believe in evil spirits infesting people, ECT can be seen as chasing them out of a person. Olanzapin might be seen as a poison to evil spirits. It is all about the narrative of psychiatric diseases. We are secular so we try to explain things that way.

Sources: 1. ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2020.160103 2. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6610531 (6,7) 3. www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/fda-ect-supporting-vital-treatment 4. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181977 5. www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-preparing-correct-submission/premarket-approval-pma 6. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28799472/ 7. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638239917652?journalcode?ijmh20 8. www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/ect-dangerous-either-side-pond 9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18379329/ 10. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191622/ 11. www.researchgate.net/publication/340718982_cognitive_side-effects_of_electroconvulsive_therapy_what_are_they_how_to_monitor_them_and_what_to_tell_patients 12. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc344257/ 13. qz.com/523676/undercover-activists-show-what-happens-at-electroshock-gay-conversion-therapy-cliinics-in-china 14. annals-general-psychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12991-021-00333-7 15. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184591/ 16. www.researchgate.net/publication/5300298_the_misdiagnosis_of_bipolar_disorder_as_a_psychotic_disorder_some_of_its_causes_and_their_influence_on_therapy 17. www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-56428994 18. bpsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12335 19. www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-58800710 20. www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/ect 21. www.bbc.com/news/uk-52900074 22. repository.uel.ac.uk/download/6f15f49c4021ee397aef1abbb71a8fac6d4fac1347ae4eab733d3ccaedf9a30d/892186/ECT%20REVIEW%20RESUBMISSION.pdf 23. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967695/

Love how you ended the video. You're done. No bull. Bye!

Great video. It must have taken quite a bit of work. Some initiatives were actually kind of surprising to hear.