Відео

Hey! I love your videos and these are a total gem! Could you make more classes on contract law pleaseee 😔😔😔

Is there any fraud class

Please make a essay suggestion video for 2024 may

Your lectures have really helped me a great . Much obliged.

hii, i was wanting to combine A levles law with psychology and business. is this a good combination?

Hello, is law politics and history a good combo? Thanks

A lot of learning from this lecture of your teaching methods

Hi these are really great lectures and are higly appreciated, I'm studying a level law in my late 40s and without people like you putting this stuff up my life would be much harder. So thanks.

😍😍

Hi I hope you respond. I'm a gap year student. On last years law paper for criminal paper 1, the topics of evaluation were only consent and self-defense. Are the topics of evaluation all of them for this year?? Please answer urgently.

pleaseee ms

part 2 nowww

where's part 2

Thank you very much hoping some videos will come out soon.They are very helpful . Good presentation

She’s back!!

Well presented.Thank you

Hi, is politics, law and psychology a strong combination. if no, can you suggest on a strong pick. Thanks

Thank you this is so helpful 😊

Hey I am thinking about taking history english combined and law for A levels . Is this strong overall and because it is three essay writing subjects would it be too much for me to do?

Is this Edexcel ?

for ur point: is our support for others indirectly helping our smaller circle's purpose? do you think it is good to bring in Nozick's argument against the redistribution of tax where he argued that taxing the rich to help the poor is a form of slavery and thus in this case, we should put more moral duties to our family and friends, instead of helping people that are not closely related to us

hello miss, at 40.10, can I argue that it's difficult to say whom we should place more moral duties/obligations on? according to modern liberals and critics of liberalism, there are 3 types of moral obligation. Firstly, the universal duties that we owe to every human being in order to prevent harming people; then voluntary obligation which is acquired by consent through agreements and promises; lastly, the obligation of membership and loyalty. Hence, in my opinion, family, friends, and people around the world shouldn’t be compared as the types of moral obligation that we have in each situation would differ.... is this a valid argument?

Thanks for the tutorials. Although Dave would have most likely died independent of the shooting, Reginald's actions did accelerate his death. In Dyson(1908) a father's beating of his son cause him to suffer severe injuries which ultimately lead to his death. It was established by way of medical evidence that the son would have died not long from meningitis. On upholding his conviction of manslaughter, the court held that it was enough that he accelerated his son's death. How do we reconcile this? Perhaps the time involved until Dave meets his impending impact death is so limited that the accelerated death wouldn't matter!

My boyfriend killed his friend's rapist,immediately after she told him about it.He took the shotgun and went to the rapist house. It was caused by the heat of passion. He was wrongfully convicted of murder during a robbery in the first degree(there is proof he didn't commit a robbery, and he didn't plan... it was something he did while he was mad). He is serving his 35th year of life without parole in prison. He was suppose to get between 10-20 years,here in Alabama,if the crime would have been labeled as voluntary manslaughter.

Australian law? Thank you!

appreciate this material alot ma'am u are also very a kind motherly voice, I've never had a good mum never had a stable figure it was quite violent towards me AND as well as insensitive and it made my art masterpiece as a child disappear i drew flowers

also 432hz only or 174hz is great awesome maam

ua-cam.com/users/CommonLawAssent

Are you gonna do vid for evaluation for ecthr

Thank you very much

Hello. I have an A level exam on the 20th 😬unit 4. Do you have videos on the evaluation of non fatal offences or fatal offences? Thank you. Your video was helpful for my exam tomorrow

This is an absolute lifesaver for my exam tomorrow. Thankyou :]

Does william go on the first one for self defence a01 - 53:55?

I'm doing ocr and found this incredibly helpful, thank you so much! Will you be doing a video on paper 2 OLA evaluation and perhaps paper 3 also?

can you share the self-defence answers for the fill in the blank questions. i'm not quite sure where some of the cases go?

Well presented thank you.This will go along way In helping me in my LLB exams

This was a good tutorial. However, the case references used in some defences I.e. self defence, all involved death of the victims and this technically excludes them as good case references for non-fatal offences.

Very much appreciated

Your subscription to my channel is important for me. ua-cam.com/users/HamzaArshad07

Great

Nice

Great analysis. Thank you so much.

Great video thank you. So in your opinion regarding the classic Empire State problem, would you say neither Louis or Reg would be liable as their acts both fail the legal causation but for test? Or, would you say Reg is more liable as his act was the real operative cause which broke Louis’ chain? Or, thirdly, would you suggest Reg was liable for manslaughter for recklessly firing a weapon on the basis of the operative cause test but without intent to kill (as he probably wouldn’t know that he would hit Dave’s falling body). To me it seems like a manslaughter charge for Reg seems plausible and Louis by a freak technical legal loophole relating to causation would be acquitted.

Thanks for the video! Very good teaching!

Useful presentation

hey, can you help me please in understanding differences between automatism & insanity is a more elaborated way, please.

Thank you so much for this. Very informative 👏 👌

thank you so much you were so helpful

your video is so helpful.why you dont upload more videos?

thank you