Відео

elaborate?

Thanks for approval! I will keep filming this type of video!

40 years?

675NK is not on sell at this time. I think NK will be better without the horrible riding position. Really hope CFMOTO tune the ECU again for smooth throttle control.

@@zc32q The CFMoto dealer told me that the 675NK will have a slightly smoother Throttle Response than the SR-R and 5 hp less. But the maximum torque is at a lower RPM than the SR-R. So it will probably be perfect for wheelies and tight mountain roads :)

@@zc32q The only way you can rely on the computer to open the throttle bodies smoothly and more progressive is with a throttle by wire setup. The 675 SR and NK have throttle cable control from the twist grip in your right hand directly connected to the throttle bodies. The ECU cannot intervene in how fast or slow or how far you open the throttle when you twist the grip. Your wrist is directly in control of how much air is let into the engine. The ECU responds to how much air you let into the engine. Until you understand the operating principals of the two different types of throttle bodies you are not going to understand what the ECU can and cannot be tuned to do.

porque claramente esta rompiendo la ley. exceso de velocidad... la verdad me parece una mala reseña con fines de solo conseguir vistas. es una excelente moto por el precio! y hasta el lo menciono. esta mas barata que una Ninja 500

Good point! But I personally ride a ducati scrambler 800 daily without the throttle problem in 675SR. The scrambler 800 is famous for aggressive power delivery. Actually, most other bikes with cable-controlled throttle is direct and linear. 675SR throttle is not like that, the initial reaction is not direct but kind of blur. CFMOTO has this problem in their bikes for long period as CLC450 shared the exact same problem as 675SR. You have to pay 120% attention carefully open the throttle to avoid unexpected dash.

@@zc32q If you would have raced in motocross back in the day when it was all cable controlled 2 strokes with carburetors the on off throttle issue was in your face. Watch old videos of races from back then and listen. When they go across the whoop-ds. The issue all people are having is the throttle cables have to be adjusted to remove the slack to the throttle. This should have been done during PDI before wheeling it out on the showroom floor.

​@@CharlesR.SteinruckIII The cable of the bike was correct set during PDI. Compare a modern 4 strokes road legal sport bike with 2 strokes dirt bike is not fare. The vague but not clear reaction in 675sr is no good for both sport and daily ride.

@@zc32q You can read and totally miss the point. Comparing a 2 strokes on-off throttle response is not fair. It is the point. They have the most extreme example of on-off throttle response in extreme condition. A driving surface with bumps, ruts, jumps and landing that make your wrist have to compensate for smoot operation. All the while constantly trying not to be disconnected from the bike compared to a smooth paved road or track surface. Now you're riding on the street and having a hard time modulating a throttle smoothly and it is an issue. What is throwing your game off. Hey, it was your video showing your issues. Cracking the throttle to rev match your down shifts. The ECU was not there for you. It could not compensate for how far open you opened the throttle and what MPH you were doing for a smooth and linear downshift sequence. It was jerky they all were. All the electronic aids that are on bikes now compensate for the driver's inability to master the analogy control of bikes from the past. You rely on ABS not to lockup. You rely on traction control in wet and dry conditions. Wheelie control not to flip over. IMU for yaw, pitch, acceleration, and deceleration. Two-way quick shifter for smooth upshifts and perfect rev matched downshifts. E-clutches for the person who never learned to drive a manual transmission car. If a person learns on a bike without any of this electronic compensation and is successful will make a better motorcyclist. You have a feeling for what you need to do. You become one with the bike. You learn each other's limits. People getting on the computer-controlled bike will never know their limits because the bike is in control. It saves the person the embarrassment of learning how to learn on their own. All the while that person is thinking they really know all the ins and outs of being a true master of the machine.

​@@CharlesR.SteinruckIII I read your review entirely before and thought you miss my point as well. I manual blipped the throttle through downshift to rev match the bike and complained nothing about it. The bike reaction is sharp and direct. I was not that kind of rider heavily rely on the computer. In fact, I ride the bike with ABS only. The problem with this bike is 0-10% throttle input, the bike just delay and react suddenly. Hope you get a change to try it, you will get my point. Maybe as you said , the pro rider can handle the fault easily. But I guarantee they prefer a smooth bike for daily. We should compare the bike in its class, not for something competition only.

In my test ride experience, I felt the bike was putted in the market for a rush. There are many details need more tunning. The current version is not that good.

Where’s the fun in that

it is already a big brand. It has won the motogp

@@watb8689 on a triumph engine and a kallex frame. That being said,cf moto was just a sponsor nothing more. They are doing a great job on consumer market as a rival on established brands none the less.

@@watb8689 xddd moto 3 xd ni siquiera estan en moto gp

@@rela4life168 they are in moto3 and moto 2 stpid . The cfmoto aspar team

more like a mt09

3 cylinder fr

More like the TRIUMPH Street Triple 675(Gen. 07-09)

I like the footpeg positions on the bobber better.

Stock exhaust for sure