Manual vs Etabs vs Prota Structure vs Staad Pro vs Autodesk Robot | Reaction Result Comparison

#Etabs #ProtaStructure #StaadPro
Watch Reaction Result Comparison in between these commonly used programs.
Try Prota Structure using this link- www.protasoftware.com/protast...
For Quotation- www.protasoftware.com/request...
Join as member to support the channel. To be member click the link given below- / @decodebd
You can visit our website for resources also- decode-bd.com/
--------------------------------------
Related Tags:
Etabs,Prota Structure,Staad Pro, Autodesk Robot, Result Comparison, Manual Load Calculation, Structural Design, Structural Design Programs, Structural Design Software
#Click Here To Subscribe the Channel: ua-cam.com/users/decodebd?su...
#Checkout all playlists:
ua-cam.com/users/view_all_play...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOVE YOU ALL MY VIEWERS & SUBSCRIBERS .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[@kimcyrusm8995]

What I love about Protastructure is its concrete designer

[@mdzahidhasankhan4647]

Thanks a lot.This is the information that I wanted to know❤️

[@gandhihammoud7252]

try to use grid 5.3x5.3 in prota structure and move the columns and beams to get outside distances 5.3x5.3 , in this case you will get a slab of 5.3x5.3 instead of 5x5

[@Engrwaleed555]

That exactly what i was thinking.

[@prasadankam]

Hello Sir,
Thanks for the Videos....... They are very informative. I have a few questions regarding the modelling in etabs and staad pro. When we have framing system where beams doesn't rest on columns, (which is very common in residential buildings) I have found different results after analysis in staad and etabs. I know etabs have effective factors for sway and non sway and in staad we only provide effective length factor as 0.85. Can we change the effective length factors in etabs and in what cases we can change those sway factors ??
I am asking this question because I am getting a lot of reinforcement even for a small building in etabs.
Thanks for your time.

[@engmahmoud8518]

I need to know how to modele eccentric footing with strap in protastructure thank you

[@hcStructuralDesigns]

Sir, you could considered cype cad also for comparison.

[@masmhmd2488]

Thanks Sir, that was nice explanation.
Could you please make a video on how to use yield line method in protastructure for solid slabs analysis? I've never found any video for this in youtube

[@gauravpatel1246]

Portra structure are available in Indian code?

[@mechanicosz9337]

Nice video, now do a modal analysis on the same structure to compare the mode shapes and frequencies.

[@azmat_waseem]

Very Informative... Shukran...

[@murtadhaabddulkareem7913]

Thanks,
Please more conceptual videos not only how to use software. Also please disable the click sound. :D I felt I am working in windows 98 environment.,

[@azmat_waseem]

One Humble request for PEB with DL+LL+WL+EL+Crane Load Modeling, analysis & Design with PHYSICAL MODELING in STAAD PRO CONNECT EDITION V22 UPDATE 9.... Because i heard, we can model as similar as in site, like with member offsets.... Thank you....

[@Decodebd]

Noted.

[@Hangool_Academy]

Which one is easier to use brother, I have robot

[@gandhihammoud7252]

Thank you for the explanation, but please be aware that the slab load should be distributed on 5.3x5.3 and not on 5x5 in your excel sheet (manual calculation), my best wishes

[@Decodebd]

That one I have explained in the later portion of the video. Please check the complete video.

[@SaifulIslam-db3vo]

আসসালামু আলাইকুম স্যার, অনলাইনে আপনাদের স্ট্রাকচারাল ডিজাইন এর কোনো কোর্স আছে কি?

[@ronnie9096]

I guess your manual calculation is not conforming with software calculation because all the structural members are connected through axial lines i.e analytically you have to consider 5 m x 5 m slab dimension and beam length as 5m then the self-weight will match cent percent. check all the analytical dimensions of the slab shown in your various software example. Besides, the unit weight of concrete as per the American code is 23.5631, 24, 23.6 & 23.5616 kN/m3 for Etabs, Prota. Robot and Staad pro respectively. Unit weight is slightly different for different countries' codes. For Manual checking and comparison, you have to conform to the analytical model, not the physical model. In your manual calculation, you are considering only 4.4m but all the 4 software is considering 5m as per your modeling. Therefore, the self-weight of your structure will be different from the manual calculation. And Differences/variations in software results are due to variations in unit weight considered by different software as mentioned above.

[@samseg7743]

I also noticed prota structure slab load is slightly higher when compared with manual calculation

[@user-es7td1jh1p]

What about etabs v20 brother?
Is it agood or not?
You must explain the program.

[@user-es7td1jh1p]

What is rhe different between Etabs v19 and v20?

[@hasibquazi7994]

Sir etabs takes death load by default no need to take separately.

[@Decodebd]

Etabs considers Self weight by default. I haven’t defined that separately. I have separated the Floor finish load as Superimposed Dead Load.

[@eng.abdulazizalhrby611]

Span is 4.7m not 5m

[@dinssefahasen6467]

Aselamaleykum werahmetullah weberekatihu dear bro please attach the file

[@gowthamiv4841]

Video is not clear

[@Decodebd]

Check internet speed. Sometimes video quality doesn’t come clear for slower internet speed.