Introduction to Modern Textual Criticism - 13
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 бер 2024
- In this lesson on Bibliology, Erik Wait provides an Introduction to Modern Textual Criticism.
Recommended Reading
Gary North, The Hoax of Higher Criticism, Christian Liberty Pr (January 1, 1990)
www.garynorth.com/freebooks/d...
Mark Ward, What Does the Bible Say About The Bible, Independently published (November 9, 2020)
Mark Ward’s UA-cam Channel: / @markwardonwords
David Alan Black & David S. Dockery, New Testament Criticism & Interpretation, Zondervan (January 1, 1991)
Craig Blomberg, The Historical Reliability Of The Gospels, IVP Academic; Second Edition, Revised, Second (October 18, 2007)
Philip Wesley Comfort, The Quest For The Original Text Of The New Testament, Wipf & Stock Pub (September 2, 2003)
Bruce M. Metzger, The Test Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, Oxford University Press; 4th edition (April 28, 2005)
✝READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. If you have not watched the videos in this series, don’t bother asking questions. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
My thought on the Torah is that Genesis and early Exodus need not to have been given by Moses because the content was already known.I believe Moses did have contact with God on Sinai and likely took mid-Exodus through Numbers and then Joshua wrote Deuteronomy.I don't doubt that the Holy Spirit guided scribes also like what you sort of said.They kept the spirit of the proto scrolls written by the actual prophets!
I've mentioned several times throughout this series that some writers were moved by the Holy Spirit to do an investigation and " to write an orderly account" (Luke 1:3). Luke does not claim to be an eyewitness but rather he did an investigation for Theophilus. Likewise, throughout the 1&2 Kings there are references to other historical documents, "Now the rest of the acts of Jehu, and all that he did, and all his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? " (2 Kings 10: 34). Moses could have been moved by the Holy Spirit to write the historical parts of the Genesis in a similar fashion.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism.
I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin,
but not the Greek so out it goes.
Good will towards men
Doxology in Matthew
Without cause
God manifest in the flesh
Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin,
so out they go
The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek
and Latin so out they go.
Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8
some throw out.
If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem,
what would you see as a problem?
I have several questions for you. Did you read the pinned comment at the top? Have you read any of the resources I have recommended in this video? All of your questions are answered in those books. Do you have the ability to formulate complete sentences or are you just cutting and pasting from the Internet?
@@KildaltonBTS I have read both sides. My problem is that in the ancient world the only way to communicate between different areas was by letters like Paul's or synods and the first historical recension of the Greek church texts was done in 1904 A.D. The Patriarchal Text. I hope that helps. Answering my questions would be helpful. Blessings.
The Patriarchal Text (PT) of 1904 is a text created within Eastern Orthodoxy and has nothing to do with the history of the Bible that precedes it. The Latin texts are irrelevant as neither the OT Prophets or Apostles wrote in Latin. In fact, the errors in the Vulgate were the reason for the motto "ad fontes", which means "back to the source" of the Hebrew and Greek texts during the Reformation . Have you ever seen statues of Moses by Michael Angelo? The depiction of a Moses with horns comes from an error in the description of Moses' face as "cornuta" ("horned") in the Latin Vulgate translation of Exodus 34. If you asking about textual variants, while I did not mention every one of them I discussed this issue in my last 2 videos. Did you watch the videos? If you are asking about how, given the existence of textual variants, a Christian can have epistemological confidence regarding the trustworthiness of the Bible there are two positions on this: (1) Textual Absolutism (Held By KJV ONLy advocates) and (2) Textual Confidence (held by Historical Christianity). For more on this, check out these videos: ua-cam.com/video/mseAF_n40xk/v-deo.html