- 18
- 3 432
Kildalton Biblical Theological Studies
United States
Приєднався 13 лют 2022
Kildalton Biblical Theological Studies (KBTS) was founded to provide Bible College/Seminary Level courses FREE to all Christians or those who want to know more about the Christian Faith & Worldview.
CONTRIBUTORS:
Erik F. Wait - A graduate of Westminster Seminary (CA) and Fuller Theological Seminary.
CONTRIBUTORS:
Erik F. Wait - A graduate of Westminster Seminary (CA) and Fuller Theological Seminary.
Flawed and Justifiable Hermeneutical Axioms - 3
In this lesson on Hermeneutics, Erik Wait discusses flawed and justifiable Hermeneutical Axioms.
Recommended video series on Bibliology by Erik Wait:
ua-cam.com/play/PLpNc_abRBwFV-GTvmy3weLq8Lbljq9RSf.html
Recommended video series on Bibliology by Erik Wait:
ua-cam.com/play/PLpNc_abRBwFV-GTvmy3weLq8Lbljq9RSf.html
Переглядів: 46
Відео
Hermeneutics of Good and Necessary Consequence - 2
Переглядів 6321 день тому
In this lesson on Hermeneutics, Erik Wait discusses interpreting the Bible through “Good and Necessary Consequence.” Recommended video series on Bibliology by Erik Wait: ua-cam.com/play/PLpNc_abRBwFV-GTvmy3weLq8Lbljq9RSf.html
Introduction to Hermeneutics - 1
Переглядів 17428 днів тому
In this lesson Erik Wait provides an Introduction to Hermeneutics Watch the series on Bibliology here: ua-cam.com/play/PLpNc_abRBwFV-GTvmy3weLq8Lbljq9RSf.html
English Bible Translations - 14
Переглядів 1563 місяці тому
In this lesson on Bibliology, Erik Wait provides an Introduction to English Bible Translations. Recommended video by Mark Ward: Are TR and Critical Text “Completely Different”?: ua-cam.com/video/GElM1uEk6D8/v-deo.html&t
Introduction to Modern Textual Criticism - 13
Переглядів 3944 місяці тому
In this lesson on Bibliology, Erik Wait provides an Introduction to Modern Textual Criticism. Recommended Reading Gary North, The Hoax of Higher Criticism, Christian Liberty Pr (January 1, 1990) www.garynorth.com/freebooks/docs/pdf/the_hoax_of_higher_criticism.pdf Mark Ward, What Does the Bible Say About The Bible, Independently published (November 9, 2020) Mark Ward’s UA-cam Channel: www.you...
Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible (Part 2) - 12
Переглядів 4394 місяці тому
In this lesson on Bibliology, Erik Wait continued to talks about alleged discrepancies of the Bible. Recommended books: Gleason Archer, “Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties”, Zondervan (January 1, 1982) John Haley, “Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible” Whitaker House; Updated edition (February 1, 2004) Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, “When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties”, B...
Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible (Part 1) - 11
Переглядів 3024 місяці тому
In this lesson on Bibliology, Erik Wait talks about alleged discrepancies of the Bible. Recommended books: Gleason Archer, “Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties”, Zondervan (January 1, 1982) John Haley, “Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible” Whitaker House; Updated edition (February 1, 2004) Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, “When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties”, Baker Books (S...
The Transmission of the Bible - 10
Переглядів 1825 місяців тому
In this lesson on Bibliology Erik Wait teaches on the topic of the transmission of the Bible. Recommended Reading: F. F. Bruce, "The Canon of Scripture" IVP Academic (October 31, 1988) Norman Geisler & William Nix, "From God to Us" Moody Publishers (June 1, 1974) Norman Geisler & William Nix, "General Introduction To The Bible" Moody Publishers; New edition (August 8, 1986)
The Canonicity of the Bible - 09
Переглядів 2375 місяців тому
In this video Erik Wait discusses the doctrine of the Canonicity of the Bible. Recommended reading: F.F. Bruce, "The Canon of Scripture" IVP Academic (October 31, 1988)
The Composition of the Bible - 08
Переглядів 2386 місяців тому
In this video Erik Wait talks about The Composition of the Bible. Recommended Reading: William Shedd, "Dogmatic Theology" (P&R Publishing; 3rd ed. edition, October 20, 2003)
The Authority of the Bible (Part 2) - 07
Переглядів 1446 місяців тому
In this lesson on Bibliology Erik Wait continues teaching on The Authority of the Bible. For further reading: John Frame, The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (P&R Publishing; First Edition,, August 1, 1987)
The Authority of the Bible (Part 1) - 06
Переглядів 616 місяців тому
In this video Erik Wait discusses the supreme authority of Jesus Christ, as revealed in Scripture, in the Christian Worldview and over all authorities on earth. For further reading: John Frame, The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (P&R Publishing; First Edition,, August 1, 1987)
The Inerrancy of the Bible - 05
Переглядів 3276 місяців тому
In this lesson Erik Wait teaches on and defends the doctrine of the inerrancy of Scripture. For further reading: Robert Saucy, The Bible: The Breathed Word of God (Wheaton: Victor Books, 1960) James Boice, Foundations of the Christian Faith, (IVP Academic; Subsequent edition, June 19, 1986)
The Infallibility of the Bible - 04
Переглядів 887 місяців тому
In this lesson Erik Wait teaches on the doctrine of the infallibility of the Bible. Recommended further reading: Norman Geisler & Thomas Howe, When Critics Ask (Baker Books; September 1, 1992) Norman Geisler & Ron Brooks, When Skeptics Ask (Baker Books; April 19, 1990.) Norman L. Geisler, A General Introduction to the Bible (Moody Publishers; August 8, 1986.)
Introduction To Kildalton Biblical Theological Studies
Переглядів 1017 місяців тому
In this video Erik Wait introduces Kildalton Biblical Theological Studies.
Happy to join the new series
Thanks for watching! I am hoping to post a new lesson each week. Stay tuned!
Watch lesson 2 "Hermeneutics of Good and Necessary Consequence" here: ua-cam.com/video/di8ExA-QXBU/v-deo.html
Just wanted to say thanks for putting this channel together. I look forward to going back through with my notes and watching future lessons. Please keep them coming.
Thanks for the comments. I’ve been busy studying for exams in Scotland for the past few weeks but I’m working on notes for my next series on Hermeneutics.
IMHO, the downstream variations are bad. Starting heavy in Genesis but all throughout the Bible are repeats of numbers and names by fixed amounts as it creates analogs for downstream use. The religion becomes a carrier shell or "Ark" to carry by the masses. We know it rained for forty days and nights. Do we know Noah was said forty times too? That's just one of hundreds of these. Those masses who are unaware of the repeating code sequences drop them from the Bible and the hidden teaching is lost. Go upstream to the original source as much as possible. And read interpretations by scholars not theists. Scholars want the words to be accurate and theists want the teaching to be historical. Then interpret from there.
To begin with "the downstream versions are bad" without any indication as to what you consider to be "upstream" is a failure to be clear as to what you are referring to with this metaphor. The metaphor appears in no scholarly references that I know of in regards to textual criticism, Bibliology or translations. To search for "hidden meanings" in a texts via "secret codes" is the very essence of Gnosticism and anti-Christian spiritualism. Apparently you did not read or just ignored the pinned comment above regarding lengthy debates in this platform.
✝READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. If you have not watched the videos in this series, don’t bother asking questions. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
Too weak. You are simply saying things you believe in. Every cultist does the same.
But a cultist can't defend his worldview nor can an atheist. I operate not on fideism, but from a worldview which alone can provide a justifiable epistemology and the necessary preconditions for intelligibility. I will go more into this in a course on worldviews. For now, check out this debate between the late Greg Bahnsen and Gorden Stein: ua-cam.com/video/fegBF-jyrBY/v-deo.html
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
I have several questions for you. Did you read the pinned comment at the top? Have you read any of the resources I have recommended in this video? All of your questions are answered in those books. Do you have the ability to formulate complete sentences or are you just cutting and pasting from the Internet?
@@KildaltonBTS I have read both sides. My problem is that in the ancient world the only way to communicate between different areas was by letters like Paul's or synods and the first historical recension of the Greek church texts was done in 1904 A.D. The Patriarchal Text. I hope that helps. Answering my questions would be helpful. Blessings.
The Patriarchal Text (PT) of 1904 is a text created within Eastern Orthodoxy and has nothing to do with the history of the Bible that precedes it. The Latin texts are irrelevant as neither the OT Prophets or Apostles wrote in Latin. In fact, the errors in the Vulgate were the reason for the motto "ad fontes", which means "back to the source" of the Hebrew and Greek texts during the Reformation . Have you ever seen statues of Moses by Michael Angelo? The depiction of a Moses with horns comes from an error in the description of Moses' face as "cornuta" ("horned") in the Latin Vulgate translation of Exodus 34. If you asking about textual variants, while I did not mention every one of them I discussed this issue in my last 2 videos. Did you watch the videos? If you are asking about how, given the existence of textual variants, a Christian can have epistemological confidence regarding the trustworthiness of the Bible there are two positions on this: (1) Textual Absolutism (Held By KJV ONLy advocates) and (2) Textual Confidence (held by Historical Christianity). For more on this, check out these videos: ua-cam.com/video/mseAF_n40xk/v-deo.html
My thought on the Torah is that Genesis and early Exodus need not to have been given by Moses because the content was already known.I believe Moses did have contact with God on Sinai and likely took mid-Exodus through Numbers and then Joshua wrote Deuteronomy.I don't doubt that the Holy Spirit guided scribes also like what you sort of said.They kept the spirit of the proto scrolls written by the actual prophets!
I've mentioned several times throughout this series that some writers were moved by the Holy Spirit to do an investigation and " to write an orderly account" (Luke 1:3). Luke does not claim to be an eyewitness but rather he did an investigation for Theophilus. Likewise, throughout the 1&2 Kings there are references to other historical documents, "Now the rest of the acts of Jehu, and all that he did, and all his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? " (2 Kings 10: 34). Moses could have been moved by the Holy Spirit to write the historical parts of the Genesis in a similar fashion.
✝READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. If you have not watched the videos in this series, don’t bother asking questions. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
Why would an inerrant book from the very mind of God even have anything in it that could be considered a discrepancy? Wouldn’t God be perfect at communicating his will and desire? Certainly his will supersedes human minds and wills and could thus produce a truly perfect text despite it being written by people if he wanted to. So why didn’t he? Is he limited? Or did he just not want to and preferred the confusion and thousands of denominations and doctrines based on his supposed perfect word? None of that strikes you the least bit odd?
Did you watch the video? Have you watched the previous videos? As explained in previous lessons God has given us his inerrant word without discrepancies. The problem is with men not the Bible. Yet, as Peter states, the unlearned and unstable twist it to their own destruction (2 Peter 3:16-18). God was clear about what he said concerning eating the tree of the knowledge good and evil yet the serpent said they would not die. (Genesis 3:4). In a similar fashion, many in the history of the church have added Greek philosophy to the Bible, with which they then come up with unbiblical doctrines that distort the gospel and the sacraments. The church has always been plagued with heretics, false prophets, Gnostics, and false teachers. And today the seminaries are full of them.
@@KildaltonBTSI can point out to you dozens of flat out errors in the text. (So will a quick google search and a free easy to use Hebrew or Greek lexicon) And that’s not including errors in different translations. Let’s say though for the sake of another point it is inerrant and as you say men are interpreting it incorrectly. In what way can YOU have any confidence your interpretation is correct? Because as I’m sure you understand there are over 40k different denominations will wildly different interpretations of almost every verse in scripture. What makes your interpretation special? Why do you believe not just the book is inerrant but your specific interpretation is too? (Or at least why you think it is the superior interpretation and why)
@ButConsiderThis did you read the pinned comment at the top? Have you bothered to do the research to see if whatever discrepancy you think there is has resolved? If not, then you’re one of those I referred to at the beginning of this video. I agree there are less-than-perfect translations and I'll cover that in a future lesson. In regards to interpretation, I'll cover that in my next series on hermeneutics. But this applies not just to the Bible but to the U.S. Constitution. When you have a Supreme Court who has NO interest in the original intent and meaning of the authors but instead seek to twist it to further their political agenda it does not make the Constitution meaningless or indecipherable. The same goes for those in the early church who read the Bible through the lens neo-platonism or in the middle ages who read the Bible through the lens of Aristotle. We interpret ALL things (Including the content of these UA-cam comments) through the epistemological lens of our worldview. The question then is, "What worldview can provide a justifiable epistemology and account for the necessary preconditions of intelligibility?" I covered this in earlier lessons and will again in a future series on Worldview Apologetics.
Great video ,I have a great blog you may like on biblical history
✝READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory both now and forever. Amen.✝
Seminaries are the main cause of decline of trust in the Bible
Seminaries and the televangelists who are getting rich off of foolish people.
Would you say the esv, niv ect is infallible?
Have you watched the entire series from the beginning? I recommend doing so and watch it until the end. In context, when we talk about the inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture we are talking about the autographa (the original writing penned by the author) not a singular specific manuscript or specific translation. The New Testament quotes the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old Testament) and yet the Septuagint isn't a perfect translation of the Hebrew into the Greek. Yet writers of the gospels quote from it and the apostles quote from it in their epistles. What you should ask is, "Is the Septuagint, NIV, ESV, KJV...." a good representation of the of the autographa?" I would answer, "Yes, good enough that we can say it is the very word of God as far it is accurately translated." I will get more into this in a future lesson on Bible translations. In the mean time, I highly recommend checking out Mark Ward's channel as he spends much more time on this subject than I will in this series: www.youtube.com/@markwardonwords
Thank you sir. I've always wondered why modern Bible readers don't take what the Bible says as it says it. Science, theology, relationship, just commands and events as it is and believe God what he said rather the "new info". All sorts of false ideas of creation narrative, state of man in his sinfulness, God's plan of salvation, Christ's Lordship and much more has risen in the past 200 years. This is why there are so many interpretations. Can you talk about new modern translations and this issue of the 2 manuscripts that were used being supposedly older and better for these new bibles (critical text).... Did not many new teachings and debates arise after they were presented?
I have plans for a lesson on modern translations. Stay tuned! In the mean time I highly recommend checking out Mark Ward's channel as he spends more more time on this subject than I will in this series. Leave him a comment and let him know I sent you! His channel is here: www.youtube.com/@markwardonwords
✝ READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
All the Books of the New Testament, as they are commonly received, we do receive, and account them Canonical. 39 Articles of Religion
Perhaps you could have prefaced the comments on the book of Revelation as your personal opinion, since you are fully aware other Christians do not share the preterist view?
That would be stating the obvious. I grew up in Dispensationalism so I’m well aware of other perspectives. When I make the comment I provide a resource for viewers further study. It’s also a means of “advertising” a series I’ll do in the future. I don’t ever recall hearing a dispensationalist, a Baptist, a Lutheran or whatever follow every assertion with “that’s my personal opinion.” In fact, for over a century dispensationalism has dominated American evangelicalism and yet historically it’s a novelty. I’ve yet to hear John MacArthur or anyone else say in a sermon or message regarding their understanding of Matthew 24 or The Revelation… “and that’s my opinion.”
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING: The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. I WILL DO A LENGTHY SERIES ON ROMAN CATHOLICISM AND ANSWER ALL ROMAN CATHOLIC ARGUMENTS IN THAT SERIES. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
✝ The purpose of this UA-cam channel is to provide a theological education for those who want to learn. If you have a question, I will answer it. But the comment section of UA-cam is not conducive to long complicated debates nor is it the best use of our time. All trolls will be blocked. May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen. ✝
I READ ALL TBE BOOKS OF THE BIBLE BE THEY OF THE Canon or not. THE LIVING Holy.Spirit Comforter WILL rightly Divide all things, AND I fear not or have need the ideas of men which should or not be chosen to be placed in the Cannonized Bible!
If a book is in the Bible.... it is by definition "canon." What books are you reading that are NOT canon?
The bible is the last piece of literature that teaches the "truth". If anything it is a composition of fables, gossip, lies and embellishments. It was written by uneducated and superstitious men which is why most of the scripture makes no sense and sounds absurd and ridiculous (can you say "Immaculate Conception"?)
Yes, I can say "Immaculate Conception". But can you tell me where THAT is in the Bible? No, you can't because it isn't in the Bible. So, who is the uneducated person? The Immaculate Conception is the belief that the Virgin Mary was free of original sin from the moment of her conception. It is one of the four Marian dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church and cannot be found in Scripture.
@@KildaltonBTS I see. So the idea that God never penetrated the virgin Mary and deposited His sperm into her womb is not true? Why would you disagree with the bible. You are a Christian, correct.
Yes, I am a Christian with three undergraduate degrees and two seminary degrees. Due to a lack of education you are confusing the biblical doctrine of the Virgin Birth of Jesus Christ with the Roman Catholic doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of Mary. The Bible never says that "sperm" was deposited into Mary. Again, this is due to your lack of education. I highly recommend studying opposing worldviews as to what they actually teach rather than making uneducated assertions in a public forum. I've read the works of Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris (and their predecessors) and have watched a multitude of their debates and found them lacking cogency or displaying any ability to provide a justifiable epistemology for their worldview.
@@KildaltonBTS LOL. So than please explain with all your degrees from seminary school how can life form in the womb unless sperm is deposited there? Is it some sort of magic? How does a woman become pregnant with out sperm? (I bet you're going to say something about magic, correct?)
You say the writers of the Bible were uneducated yet ironically your every comment displays your lack of education. Even within the natural order life can form without external germination (sperm) in both plants (such as vitis vinifera) and animals (reptiles, amphibians insects). It is called Parthenogenesis. If the natural order can reproduce asexually then it is certainly no problem for One who created the universe from nothing to likewise be born of a virgin woman by the Holy Spirit. Yes, it is supernatural - a miracle not magic. So, let me ask you a question. What is your basis for making ANY epistemological assertions? For making any claims to knowledge?
Jesus Christ name Amen
I have benefited a lot. Keep it going. Thanks
May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.
Amen. AmenIndeed.. ~HalleluYAH~ Ty4 Urservice...
Thank you for watching, May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.
@@KildaltonBTS Amen. Ty4 theword ofencouragement..
Amazing- Howin abrief 5minutes youcan touchupon manytruths. Spoton asfar asthe "established& accredited" institutionswhich werelong ago- ifnot founded bycorrupt- vulgar- Anti-Mashiach <Christ> servants- Aka -Jesuits- Itwould appearfrom listening2 thisintroduction, that ~THE~MASTER~ hasapplied the eyesalve untoyour eyes-& Thehealing hasbegun. HalleluYAH Glorybe Unto2 ~THE~KING~. Ty4 Sharingthe giftsgiven 2u &offeringur service2 thebody. Imnot anintelligent- Ilistened 2the teacingof inerrency- Solid& makessense. May Yahweh Bless& strengthenyou asyou seekto hold TheLightTruth upin thesedarkening dayswhich areupon us.
May you grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.
I have suggestion for you . How about you add all of the sources in the description below the video ? I agree that the quality of the video is more important than uploading 10 videos a week .
Thanks for the suggestion. I just put a recommended reading list in the description. I hope to eventually have a web site and make the notes available.
Good job in explaining revelation.
I appreciate your comment. Currently, it is my goal to post at least 1 lesson per week.
Hi I am from Saudi Arabia and I find your video very helpful. I have converted to Christianity and hopefully after you finish your series I will understand more about the holy book . Excuse my poor language . There were many terms that need more explanation and examples so we can understand what exactly you mean. God bless your hard work 🙏.
Thank you for watching. May the Lord bless you!