M44: Given the Circumstances

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @imthygamer3566
    @imthygamer3566 5 годин тому +51

    America gets a howitzer. Every other tree gets americas howitzer

    • @petergray2712
      @petergray2712 4 години тому +2

      Until the 1970s, most prominent SPHs was of American origin. Italy and Argentina developed their own SPHs, the Palmaria (based on the OF-40), and the VCA 155 ( based on the TAM), but these still used the M109's turret and 155 mm gun. The only exceptions were Russia, France, and Sweden.

    • @SRDPS2
      @SRDPS2 2 години тому +2

      suffer from success (literally)

  • @Dawgslime
    @Dawgslime 6 годин тому +39

    Such a good vehicle, the loader gets a concussion every time you fire

  • @agniteyt
    @agniteyt 3 години тому +4

    "A fully rotating turret that offered all-round protection"
    *WITH THE 50s ABSOLUTELY SHREDDING THE M109 FROM THE SIDES AND REAR*

  • @bigmantings-uu4li
    @bigmantings-uu4li 6 годин тому +119

    cheeseburger

  • @krisi90
    @krisi90 5 годин тому +17

    M7 priest when

    • @johngreen4349
      @johngreen4349 7 хвилин тому

      Isn’t that thing just a worse m4a3 105?

  • @CrazyDave12
    @CrazyDave12 6 годин тому +28

    Bring back the old Shooting Range

  • @NMikael
    @NMikael Годину тому +2

    M44 single handedly killed the 4.0, which was a perfect ww2 ecosystem. Nice work gayjin

  • @chigii12
    @chigii12 5 годин тому +7

    Mongolian decal
    112th "Revolutionary Mongolia" Tank Brigade

  • @RealBaconBandit
    @RealBaconBandit 6 годин тому +20

    Feed the snail. Do it now.

  • @PexLis
    @PexLis 6 годин тому +6

    He slingers gotta be my favourite type of vehicles

  • @mik13ST
    @mik13ST 2 години тому +2

    Hurts immersion when both teams use it and most nations have it. This is really over the line. Might as well add a MiG-15 to the US tech tree because they likely have it somewhere in a museum.

  • @A10-thunderboltfreedommachine
    @A10-thunderboltfreedommachine 5 годин тому +5

    War thunder needs to do something about teamkillers.
    I got into a match and got shoot down in the first 10s

    • @cptmanticore7356
      @cptmanticore7356 5 годин тому

      Oh no...Anyway

    • @ryansu6746
      @ryansu6746 5 годин тому +1

      I unintentionally team kill as my artillery keeps killing my teammates while missing against enemies so I feel artillery is not bad but it can definitely be better

    • @NorbertNagy-r3t
      @NorbertNagy-r3t 4 години тому

      maybe casual play no more team kill no friendly fire this is simple

    • @revan22
      @revan22 21 хвилина тому +1

      honestly depends. They would need to have humans reviewing the kills. I never teamkill, but started playing jets not long ago (unlocked the F5eFCU from squadron vehicles). Killed a mate at spawn somehow while I wasn't even spawned in. And with another plane someone flew right into my rockets and then crashed because we hadn't seen each other and were targeting the same target. In that case I don't think it merits a ban, same with bombers like PE-8 wiping like 6 ennemies but catching an ally in the blast.

    • @A10-thunderboltfreedommachine
      @A10-thunderboltfreedommachine 3 хвилини тому

      @revan22 yeah, or AI but it makes mistakes. And i know that sometimes you TK by accident but like shooting someone thay just said "glhf" is ass move, maybe removing friendly fire would be good but that removes the realism of the game

  • @LSGaming-zk4od
    @LSGaming-zk4od 5 годин тому

    the reability of this vehicle is dying to the snail

  • @xavierkellner4791
    @xavierkellner4791 57 хвилин тому +1

    Can you buff bombers or make one big base please

  • @Emity_Incorporated
    @Emity_Incorporated 2 години тому +1

    Hear me out: B-2 Spirit next update.

  • @hoarsuh8173
    @hoarsuh8173 5 годин тому +1

    I really wanted the M7 Priest but oh well

  • @Armada-1935
    @Armada-1935 2 години тому

    I’m pretty sure it was used in Patton to represent the M7

  • @decustos4624
    @decustos4624 5 годин тому +6

    Do you intend to add the M55 artillery tank to the game?
    It could be added to USA, Germany, France (Belgium), China (Taiwan) and Italy

  • @elitebeaver4444
    @elitebeaver4444 4 години тому

    Cool. Now add the Bob Semple.

  • @Estamir
    @Estamir Годину тому

    A fun tank and a nice lil' history lesson. Rad!

  • @KlaweKlapki
    @KlaweKlapki 4 години тому +2

    Add m7 priest

  • @cotabom
    @cotabom 3 години тому

    Maybe one day we'll get the Sherman Whizbang...

  • @HankHill1998
    @HankHill1998 4 години тому

    One of the boxes of all time

  • @Shinky101
    @Shinky101 5 годин тому

    At least the basement guy hasn’t taken over these videos yet🙏

  • @bren2385
    @bren2385 5 годин тому

    IN WAR THUNDER THERES JUST 5 DUDES RANDOMLY HAVING A PICNIC IN A MOVING BUSH
    🙃🙃🙃

  • @Flame10_falcon
    @Flame10_falcon 4 години тому +2

    day 401 of waiting for Polish-Czechoslovakian or Polish-Czechoslovakian-Yugoslavian tech tree

  • @benrboss
    @benrboss 2 години тому

    give us the kranvagn already its chassis is already partially modeled as a part of the BKAN

  • @SRDPS2
    @SRDPS2 2 години тому

    T99E1 huh!
    when (driver as the more exposed crew in casemate thing isn't ideal)

  • @petergray2712
    @petergray2712 3 години тому

    Sky Reapers
    Future prospective heavy bombers and strike aircraft by estimated rank and BR. Some USSR fighters are also included. All of these are suggested additions.
    France:
    French Bomber Line Additions (Line 5):
    Heinkel He-274¹ (6.3/Rank IV)
    Dassault Mirage IV (11.3/Rank VII)/Mirage IVP (12.7/Rank VIII/nuke only)
    French Strike Line Additions (Line 4):
    Loire-Nieuport LN.401 (1.3/Rank 1)
    Germany:
    New German Premiums:
    Heinkel He-70K² Blitz
    Junkers Ju-86K
    German Bomber Line Additions (Line 5):
    Junkers Ju-89 (1.7/Rank I)
    Junkers Ju-390 (7.0/Rank IV)
    Great Britain:
    New Great Britain Premiums:
    Armstrong Whitworth Whitley
    BAC TSR.2
    British Bomber Line Additions (Line 5):
    Handley Page Heyford (1.0/Rank I)
    Vickers Valiant (9.3/Rank VI)
    Handley Page Victor (10.0/Rank VII)
    Avro Vulcan (10.7/Rank VII)
    British Strike Line Additions:
    Vultee A-31 Vengeance (1.7/Rank I)
    Italy:
    Italian Bomber Line (Line 5) Additions:
    SM.82 Marsupiale⁶ (2.0/Rank II)/Fiat RS.14 (2.0/Rank II)
    Piaggio P.50-II⁴ (2.7/Rank II)
    Piaggio P.133⁵ (5.0/Rank IV)
    Japan:
    New Japanese Premiums:
    Mitsubishi G3M Rikko
    Japanese Bomber Line (Line 5) Additions:
    Nakajima G10N Fugaku⁷ (7.0/Rank IV)
    Russia/USSR:
    New Russian Fighter Aircraft Additions:
    Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-152A Flipper (Premium, 9.7/Rank VI)
    Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-8 (Premium, 10.0/Rank VI)
    Sukhoi Su-15 Flagon (11.0/Rank VII)
    Tupolev Tu-128 Fiddler (Premium, 9.3/Rank V)
    Yak-25 Flashlight (Premium, 6.7/Rank IV)
    Nee Russian Premiums:
    Myasishchev DBV-102
    Tupolev Tu-85 Barge
    Russian Bomber Line (Line 5) Additions:
    Tupolev Tu-91 Boot (7.3/Rank IV)
    Tu-16A Badger (9.0/Rank V)
    Tu-95M Bear (9.0/Rank V)
    Il-54 Blowlamp⁸ (10.0/Rank VI)
    Tu-22K Blinder (11.3/Rank VII)
    Tu-22M Backfire (13.3/Rank VIII)
    Tu-160 Blackjack (13.7/Rank VIII)
    Russian Strike Line (Line 4) Additions:
    Tupolev Tu-91 Boot⁹ (7.3/Rank IV)
    Ilyushin Il-40P Brawny¹⁰ (8.0/Rank V)
    USA:
    New USA Premiums:
    Boeing XB-15
    Boeing B-50 Superfortress
    North American A-5 Vigilante
    North American B-45 Tornado
    Northrop XB-35/YB-49
    USA Bomber Line (Line 5) Additions:
    Convair B-36D Peacemaker (7.7/Rank IV)/McDonnell XF-85 Goblin (7.7/Rank IV)
    Boeing B-47E Stratojet (8.3/Rank V)
    Convair B-58A Hustler (9.3/Rank VI. Nuke only)
    Douglad A-3B Skywarrior (10.0/Rank VI)
    Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (11.7/Rank VII)
    Boeing B-52H Stratofortress (12.3/Rank VIII)
    B-1B Lancer¹¹ (13.3/Rank VIII)
    ¹: How many people actually know that this is the official name of the B1 series?
    USA Strike Line (Line 4) Additions:
    North American AJ Savage (7.7/Rank IV)
    Douglas A-4E Skyhawk (8.7/Rank VI)
    Grumman A-6A Intruder (10.0/Rank VI)
    ¹: Four engine development of the Heinkel 177 Greif. Intended to fix major issues with the two engine Greif, notably its tendency towards self immolation, and other issues. Heinkel subcontracted development to the Farman company in Occupied France, owing to labor shortages and preoccupation with higher priority projects. Thus the aircraft fell into the hands of the Free French when Farman was liberated in September 1944, and the prototype first flew in December 1945 in French markings.
    ²: Rank I premium. The Heinkel 70 was developed from a single engined civil airliner in the mid 1930s, and became the Luftwaffe's first schnellbomber (fast bomber). Underpowered and limited in both range and payload, the He 70 was quickly phased out, though it saw service with other Axis air forces as a liasion and training aircraft.
    ³: Britain's main interwar bomber. It was a biplane aircraft of unusual design, as the fuselage was suspended from the upper wing rather than resting on the bottom wing, and the flight deck was flush with the top of the upper wing. It was fast and very long ranged when it was developed in the late 1920s, and remained the RAF's main heavy bomber until 1937, and some remained in training squadrons until the summer of 1939.
    ⁴: The first Italian four engined bomber. Designed by an Italian engineer that had worked in the USA before the war, his experience didn't translate into a successful design. The first version was powered by tandem push-pull engines similar to some interwar French bombers, while the second version had a standard row of four engines. The airframe was excessively heavy compared to its contemporaries, and this combined with underpowered Italian engines made it an unacceptably sluggish aircraft, and it never passed the prototype phase.
    ⁵: Weight issues in both the Piaggio P.50 and P.108 aircraft made them unacceptable in speed and handling, and thus Piaggio went looking for an improved design. By late 1942, USAAF B-24 Liberator bombers were starting to attack Italian targets, and Piaggio engineers examined wreckage from shot down Liberators for insight on how to lighten their aircraft. This examination led to the P.133 aircraft, which used American design to reduce weight significantly, and to produce higher horsepower radial engines for its powerplants. The aircraft recycled many features from the P.108, but had a twin tail similar to the Liberator. Sadly it was destroyed while it was 90% complete, to prevent its capture by German forces after Italy signed an armistice with the Allies in September 1943.
    ⁶: Italy's first true long ranged Bomber was this trimotor design that was essentially an upscaled SM.79. It had sufficient range to attack British naval bases at Gibraltar and Alexandria, but ultimately was used as a transport and very rarely as a bomber. It saw heavy use as a resupply aircraft in North Africa, and when German forces occupied Italy in September 1943, they seized all surviving Marsupiales and reused them as Luftwaffe transport aircraft.
    ⁷: The Japanese Navy desperately sought a very long ranged bomber aircraft to counterattack, featuring sufficient range to attack the North American continent. The Fugaku was intended as a six engined bomber that could attack the continental USA from bases in the Home Islands. Despite their need for bombers, the Fugaku was delayed by material shortages and its unprecedented mechanical complexity, and these factors and Japan's worsening strategic situation led to its csncellation in 1944. The aircraft would have featured six massive 36-cylinder radial engines, each producing 5000 horsepower and driving contrarotating propellers. Range was to be 18,000 km (11,184 miles), with a maximum bomb load of 20,000 kg (44,000 lbs), and a top speed of 679 kmh (422 mph).
    ⁸: The IL-54 was another mid 1950s design that became a casualty of the Soviet fetish for nuclear weaponization. This was a transonic conventional bomber similar in design, appearance, and mission to the French Vautour and British Canberra bombers, with two engines mounted in nacelles, sleek fuselage, glass nose, and a tandem landing gear arrangement inspired by the USA B-47 Stratojet. It was powered by two afterburning Lyulka turbojets (same as on the Sukhoi Su-9 interceptor), was armed with three AM-23 23 mm cannon (two in a remote controlled rear barrette, and one in a fixed position in the front fuselage) and a bombload of 3000 to 5000 kg (6600 to 11,000 lbs).
    ⁹: The other contender for ugliest Russian aircraft of all time. In the late 1940s Joseph Stalin ordered that aircraft carriers were to be built, and the Tu-91 was the intended torpedo bombers for these ships. The Boot had an outlandish appearance: powered by a turboprop engine mounted mid-fuselage driving a six bladed contrarotating propeller by a shaft that ran through the cockpit, while air was drawn through two cheek mounted inlets behind the propellers. The cancellation of the Type 85 aircraft carriers following Stalin's death in 1953 led to a redesign as shore based strike aircraft, but ran afoul of Nikita Khruschev's sense of aesthetic indignation in 1955 (he was repelled by the Tu-91's appearance and also misunderstood its intended role, leading to the world's first cancellation of a weapon system based upon visual repugnance), and while the prototypes were seen in a Tushino flyby the following year, they never entered service. Despite their ugliness, they were capable strike aircraft, armed with four NR-23 cannon (two in the wing roots, and two in a remote operated, tail mounted barbette), and carrying a torpedo or combination of bombs up to 1500 kg (3300 lbs) in weight.
    ¹⁰: The second or third ugliest aircraft ever designed and built in the USSR (the ugliest being the unholy eldritch abortion that was the Mikoyan-Gurevich I-160 interceptor). Intended as a replacement for the Il-10 in the CAS role, the first IL-40 prototype was a conventional looking twin inlet jet aircraft armed with four forward mounted 23 mm cannon and featuring a rear gunner firing another 23 mm cannon in defense.
    Unfortunately the placement of the 23 mm guns in front of the engine inlets led to disastrous engines flameouts caused by the guns exhaust gases being sucked into the engines everytime they were fired (Ilyushin engineers learned nothing from the MiG-9 disaster). This led to drastic modifications in the second Il-40P prototype, with the inlets moved up to the nose in a shock ram arrangement, with the guns now mounted behind them. Aesthetically, the aircraft now looked like a giant flying hog nose, and Soviet leadership was more enamored with nuclear bombs than CAS, and it was canceled after the production of just five aircraft.
    ¹¹: How many people know that this is the official designation for the B-1 series?

  • @koopagrinder
    @koopagrinder 5 годин тому +3

    BRING BACK THE OLD SHOOTIG RANGE

  • @nikimaiki92
    @nikimaiki92 4 години тому

    Eurofighter radar needs to be fixed

  • @alpratya3139
    @alpratya3139 2 години тому

    please if adding copy and paste tanks, at least change the costmetic which is different for each country. So it becomes more interesting to play the same tank in every tech tree.

  • @Vogxel
    @Vogxel 6 годин тому

    Bless me gaijin 🙏🙏 Let the snail reign forever

  • @Guy_GuyGuy
    @Guy_GuyGuy 3 години тому +1

    Mmm. Love the dozens of Cold War+ SPGs copy-pasted to every tech tree with paper armor that doesn't fuse APHE rolling around WWII battlefields one-shotting WWII tanks. Not lame at all. Hummel? Grille? M7 Priest? Shut up and consume the post-war slop.

  • @death_is_here
    @death_is_here Годину тому

    Make the sturmtiger available again(day four hundred forty five)

  • @Duratch
    @Duratch 6 годин тому +1

    Pizza is the best food

  • @AU55IE
    @AU55IE 5 годин тому

    Day 81 of asking gaijin for folding wings on carrier aircraft and v bombers in war thunder

  • @hoang2312
    @hoang2312 5 годин тому

    re-release the sturmtiger pls Snail

  • @SwtorSateleShanFan
    @SwtorSateleShanFan 5 годин тому

    Day 6 of asking when the Avro Vulcan will come to War Thunder

  • @Benay_For_YHWH
    @Benay_For_YHWH 5 годин тому

    When f18

  • @CPL_Prince
    @CPL_Prince 3 хвилини тому

    day 2 of asking gaijin to add the eland /aml 60 to warthunder

  • @Charlotte-g4v
    @Charlotte-g4v 3 години тому

    hello how are you doing?

  • @mustafaturabituran908
    @mustafaturabituran908 Годину тому

    Why is the video AI-voiced tho

  • @FOCHT_T
    @FOCHT_T 3 години тому

    Warthunder, can you add skull emoji to chat?

  • @janosbocek3284
    @janosbocek3284 6 годин тому +1

    Hi

  • @minemaxblade
    @minemaxblade 5 годин тому

    M44 having too much potential, its almost impossible to fight against multiple targets at the same time. Still better to snipe from distances.

  • @HungarianFigther
    @HungarianFigther 5 годин тому

    sanil please M44 TAS heavy tank and M40 NIMRÓD AA for Hungary

  • @SelfSacrificer
    @SelfSacrificer 4 години тому

    Hotdog

  • @Johnnie_Dench18
    @Johnnie_Dench18 3 години тому

    Cockerel

  • @EverettoBurrito2740
    @EverettoBurrito2740 6 годин тому

    hello

  • @Jesse_de_jong
    @Jesse_de_jong Годину тому

    i love it

  • @Vincezathunderawarfafaf
    @Vincezathunderawarfafaf 6 годин тому +1

    Whopper

  • @fox0097-x3w
    @fox0097-x3w 5 годин тому

    What the heck's a kilometre 🦅🦅🦅

  • @Lackofresponsibility
    @Lackofresponsibility 6 годин тому

    Hamburger

  • @Bigjim-fx5gx
    @Bigjim-fx5gx 5 годин тому +2

    Hey gaijin can I get 10,000 GE for free

  • @General_kenobi12
    @General_kenobi12 6 годин тому

    Make new gamemodes

  • @ZeusJudien-ki6wt
    @ZeusJudien-ki6wt 6 годин тому +1

    Hi 👋

    • @ZeusJudien-ki6wt
      @ZeusJudien-ki6wt 6 годин тому

      How can I get golden eagles

    • @CrazyDave12
      @CrazyDave12 6 годин тому

      @@ZeusJudien-ki6wt credit card

    • @travo_alpha
      @travo_alpha 6 годин тому

      Paying with money, Thundershow, GE Wagers, Wiki editor, Partnership, Scummy apps, Buying a pack or Giveaway.

    • @ZeusJudien-ki6wt
      @ZeusJudien-ki6wt 5 годин тому

      @travo_alpha ok thanks 👍

  • @Norwegianboi
    @Norwegianboi 6 годин тому +1

    gaijin pls give me 1 golden egel

  • @FredtheCatSus
    @FredtheCatSus 6 годин тому +1

    Why is this game so hard?

    • @Japansmileguy
      @Japansmileguy 5 годин тому +2

      It's not?

    • @kyleschuetrum3661
      @kyleschuetrum3661 5 годин тому +1

      Skill Issue

    • @NorbertNagy-r3t
      @NorbertNagy-r3t 4 години тому

      yes but gaijin dont understand player base why not increase
      simple: need separate hardcore players they go play pvp ranked matches
      casual players need more kills/missions so PvPvE
      something like can find in air battles but not good not complete thats bots very dumbs and stupid missions ABC points what is this??? only this learn the school?

    • @NorbertNagy-r3t
      @NorbertNagy-r3t 4 години тому

      @@kyleschuetrum3661 sure everybody and than you will wonder no more players no more money no more game

  • @I.likejagdtiger
    @I.likejagdtiger 5 годин тому

    to the person reading this, why are you on yt go hop on war thunder

  • @mik13ST
    @mik13ST 2 години тому

    Stop diluting unique nations. Stop adding copy paste vehicles like this.

  • @adampoultney8737
    @adampoultney8737 4 години тому

    Stop adding these Cold War things to ww2 BRs it’s stupid

  • @NorbertNagy-r3t
    @NorbertNagy-r3t 4 години тому

    Gaijin NEVER learn not need new vehicle NEED more kill and casual play because half team always 0 kill with not enjoy this game would rather go.
    So no player base development rather a decrease. But this never learn just buy more premium why not buy a enjoy playable game?
    Ground battles NEED PvPvE And SEPARATE!!! Hardcore gamers so they all put into ranked matches.

  • @TheGijinSnail
    @TheGijinSnail 5 годин тому

    M44 is to op im getting clapped trying to play ussr

  • @chadlimestall9201
    @chadlimestall9201 4 години тому

    This history lesson does nothing for the low quality graphics that war thunder has to offer. How can you have realism without graphics from the 2020s?

    • @doomguy.23frommars60
      @doomguy.23frommars60 4 години тому +1

      Warthunder has good graphics what u talking about? They literally just upamdayed them again

  • @Iced78-su4zl
    @Iced78-su4zl 6 годин тому

    3rd

  • @KakelThunder
    @KakelThunder 6 годин тому

    first