House of Lords passes bill to stop no-deal Brexit
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2019
- Lords debate the Bill aimed to stop a no-deal Brexit. (Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
#Brexit
-----------------------
Get more news at our site - www.channel4.com/news/
Follow us: Facebook - / channel4news
Twitter - / channel4news
That was actually very interesting to listen to in the background. Brexit Season 3, best drama show on TV right now.
very soon in Netflix
This is the best reality show going right now. LOVE IT KEEP GOING GUYS.
Gods waiting room,they all look alarmingly close to the grave
52% voted for brexit and article 50, 100% of lords voted to stop delay and potentially stop brexit all together. Thats not a very good representation of the people lol
You voted in a Mickey Mouse referendum that wasn’t worth the paper it was written on.
@@up4itgal and your a msm puppet we know what we voted we dont want traitors trying to tell us what we know
@@up4itgal
If anything is Mickey mouse it's staying in the crumbling EU. And giving them every reason under the sun. To hold us to ransom you plonker.
up4atgal so a 2nd referendum is worthless too.They are denying the voters an election to deny the voters of the referendum.
@@Jack-fs2im we wanted to leave with or without a deal, MP's voted for this when they triggered article 50 including most remainers. And now they refuse to give us an election because they know people will vote leave once again. fucking cowards
People will close house of lords they're not fit to pass water let alone laws
They are fit. We need checks and balances so the government is bought to account.
@@up4itgal they're like parliament totally biased to EU
***AMEN***. Gin & Tonic past era OAP club. Time to dissolve.
RE-thinking new strategy, Prime Minister, do not lose cool, ask for extension as traitors force you to do
stuff it down throats to remoaners,
make them happy.
Then every time EU wants to pass *ANYTHING* "we as unwilling member UK",
VOTE NO, no consent, and EU will be screwed up.
DO not give consent to anything gang of EU wants.
Remember it takes JUST ONE member ..of EU, .......UK.
NO CONSENT by one member, no passing anything in EU.
SWEET SOLUTION, so sweet.
P.S. SEE UK NATION, good people, how long EU gang will be willing to enslave SOVEREIGN Nation ~LOL!
Well done the Lords for stopping a no deal car crash
M Verlaine and preventing people voting in an election to prevent the people who voted in the referendum.Why not just abolish voting altogether.be very worried.you next
Wow , this season they fixed the maximum volume bug
This place needs to be turned into a public toilet
Not content
It already is.
@@Kimble221 well yeah
It's now parliment vs the people
Its deal v no deal.. remainers and leavers could end up on the same page mutually - who gives a fk about the back stop?
Fell asleep watching UA-cam and woke up to the Ministry of Silly Walks. Tell John Cleese I said hi.
As we're no longer a democracy, shouldn't the UK be expelled from the EU by default?
If undemocratic governments were to be thrown out of the EU Ireland would have been thrown out of the EU eight years ago. Our Irish government is as undemocratic as you get.
@@Steve30x The EU itself is undemocratic but there are a lot of hypocrites running the place.
@@MrRQBQ That is also very very true
That is an interesting question. The answer is easy: no. The EU are a collective of (supposedly) democratic states. The collective uphold a common view on the requirements for democracy. But every member state is sovereign. They make their own laws and policies. Even when a certain member state changes their laws or manner with regards to their democracy, in such a way that breaches democracy standards, the other EU states may disagree, but have hardly any ability to correct that state. For example: democracy in Hungary and now also Poland are not within Europe's standards. But more than reprimands have not been made. Nor have they been expelled. The question whether the UK could be expelled from the EU assumes an authority of the EU over member states that really does not exist (and has been the unjust case for Brexit as a necessity for the UK to be sovereign - it already is).
draaienmaar are you trying to pull the wool over everyones eyes with that longwinded rubbish
I taught this was a nursing home
james carroll Really? Are you still working there?
This is why the anachronism which is the House of Lords, should be abolished as soon as possible!
@Rajmund Csombordi it's funny because we weren't the biggest Shithole of Europe before joining.
@@josephs-d8731 we were not doing at all well. A war in Northern Ireland, bombings regularly going off, moving into the mainland. The formation of the EU in 1993 with Maastrict was the beginning of the end for the civil war. Economically, we were the "sick man of Europe, with 3-day working weeks, closure of the mines, no plan for how to move on to a post-heavy industry economy. Trying rapid financial de-regulation through the 1980s leading to cyclical boom and bust. The Euro had cooled that cyclicity across europe by taking away some individual governments playing the economies as re-election tools. Over-fishing the fishing grounds leading to shoal collapse and complete dead ecosystems, having to stretch further afield to find any catches, way out of our domestic waters, beyond Iceland, leading to the Cod wars there, stealing their fish. it is all a bit more complicated that we will ever know.
Are you mad! This is what has kept Britain afloat
Im American. Is this the real power behind the scenes in Britian ?
This is NOT live, but a repeat of an earlier debate!
tom kent - It was broadcast live, then captured for replay. Most people who look at UA-cam videos understand this. Are you new here?
Yes, and current policy. We had to break the whole thing up, so we had to get inside. We tried to break it up from the outside, but that wouldn't work. Now that we're inside we can make a complete pig's breakfast of the whole thing: set the Germans against the French, the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch. The Foreign Office is terribly pleased, it's just like old times!
Given that the first quarter of the footage is that of a clock I think that would be obvious.
Man you must be dumb.
These rare noble farts are far more stuffier and difficult to bear than the more free-spirited flying flamingos of the House of Commons.
Wow, he even didn't know what the House was doing! Listen carefully from 1:31:52 for less than 30 seconds that is enough to show the competence level of the far-right Conservatives!
Gin & Tonic OAP club, relic from past era. Dissolve NOW!
lol "far right". Keep telling yourself you have anything close to resembling even center right in the UK.
Its the will of the people & Government v The undemocratic remoaner Parliament.
I know what side I am on 'THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE WHO WANT TO LEAVE THE EU organisation AS INSTRUCTED BY THE PEOPLE IN A REFERENDUM TO UPHOLD DEMOCRACY'.
Shame on Cathy Newman of C4 News for what she did on Jan 16, 2018
Is wearing one red, one blue sock a "noble lordey" thing? 1:22:41
Because their all clowns
The house of Lords is definitely as described, as is the House of Commons. 😂👍
We need to get rid of the Lord's, waste of money time and oxygen
And depends only to the childish HoC? 😂😂😂😂
In what way ?
Should it be illegal to lie to the population in order to send the nation in a nosedive towards rocky water.
what happens when Johnson refuse to follow the direction ordered
The problem here and across the world is that Politicians are not afraid of their electorate....they need to be...
American here: would all the House of Lords be descended from William the Conqueror?
Hi Sue, you might want to check out this ...
Video: EVERY baby is a ROYAL baby - Numberphile
ua-cam.com/video/Fm0hOex4psA/v-deo.html
And, know that for small recent populations (like America) any choke points such as the settlement of the new world will cause a very slightly faster local convergence. So, not only are all occupants of the House of Lords related to the same geneological line (and more recently than you might think) ... but so are you! : )
Since it is highly likely that there is considerable european blood in your family line, then you too can almost certainly claim to be of royal descent.
And with that, your majesty, I shall retire : )
Finally common sense...
Big deal
No deal
Deal v no deal, no deal is a bad option, the backstop is not a deal breaker, just an excuse.
House of Lords know that people were not cleaver enough to know what they were voting for when they decided to leave. I don't regret having a referendum but people voted the wrong way. We should now have another one or vote for jo Swinton at the next election.
The big story should be broadcast by the BBC is the will of the people is being ignored !
Ian Herries.
"My noble and learned friend...."....What a load of old nonsense,a total anachronism--Remainers one & all.....get rid asap.
is this like british senate. why is everyone so old?
Nah we didn't vote these idiots in.
zen ohm - these are the appointed fossils, aka lords, brought in by the government, funny enough this democracy is worse than the EU, but leavers think its sovereign, along with shutting parliament at one of the most crucial times.. just to get your own way.
They are the aristocrats
I think in UK they will need a 2nd, 3rd,....,.... 90th,.... 100th referendum, 'til everything will be OK.
And that fellow doing all the chatting , is a South African
Thats great but did they take into account that The EU might not negotiate a new deal? Did they take into if account that they might crash out without a deal? What if the EU refuse to give them an extension?.
If they simply crash out then they will be breaking the law that they just passed.
No they didn't take it into account due to already having arranged everything with the eu before passing the law!
@@sumorabbit2160 they also arranged to have a leprechaun party with real leprechauns in Brussels on October 31st.
Steve said : _"If they simply crash out then they will be breaking the law that they just passed."_
actually Steve, the law only prevents the UK from deliberately leaving (by action or by deliberate inaction) ... However, if the UK simply does nothing, it will automatically be ejected on the due date, without a deal. We can ask for an extension, but it is increasingly likely that this will be refused - as it only takes one country to veto.
So, no, a 'no-deal' brexit is only marginally less likely than it was before.
@@garychap8384 If they drag Boris to court there's a strong argument for the law of non-contradiction, which means one of the laws would need to be repealed/amended, which one do you think would get repealed/amended?
It's quite clear that bill 6 is designed as a power grab, they know they can't outright revoke Art 50 because of the backlash they would receive from the public and they can't amend it because it's an international treaty. Which means by logic they would have to repeal bill 6, as they can't amend it because the entire point of bill 6 is a law to make a law they made illegal even though the law they are making illegal is still the law....that they made!
@@sumorabbit2160 ummm… I didn't mention taking Boris to court. Perhaps you meant to reply to Steve.
Either way, you may not be aware of this... but many who supported the bill are also staunch brexiteers - they just reject a *no deal* Brexit … which is what Boris is actively seeking.
Obviously, the lib-dems are, indeed, hoping they can wangle a revocation of article 50... but you can't make such a broad generalisation against everyone that supported Bill 6... they're actually quite a mixed bunch.
Also, the hard brexiteers are spinning a bit of a lie... and it's quite an easy one to spot.
For example, Farage is currently giving talks to business leaders about how much money stands to be made post-Brexit, by opening the UK up to health insurance markets - of course, the NHS has to go, and he admits that. So much for British values.
Basically, Farage and the various hard brexiteers currently occupying the front bench are already in the queue for a big payout, but they need to slam the door on the EU to make it happen.
But, you're quite welcome to go on believing that Boris is all sweetness and light. I've been here long enough to know that it's futile to argue sense with either side of this debate. The trenches are dug and nobody is going to give an inch.
So, I'm already expecting you to argue. Just know that I really don't care … I don't even have a horse in this race as I'm a triple-national and I live on a yacht. I just find the whole sordid mess deeply manipulative (on both sides) and a thoroughly shameful display.
I am NEVER voting again.
Good! One less moron then.
@@barnabas5688 have you been snorting laxatives gaina, because some real foul smelling stuff came out of that face hole. "So voters are morons.. wow you are such an Intellect.. Oxford, Cambridge or was it the Kazi?
@@MalcolmPeters not all of them, just the ones who want to drive the UK off a cliff
Barnabas What about the ones who want to abolish voting
@@barnabas5688 Whats Cliff Richard has to do with it ????.
democracy in action, checks and balances , by a house that could afford to show complete indifference to the ordinary man and woman in the street ;they don't have to appease a fickle party, vested interest or a biased media or voters ,just whats best for the country !
Richard - There are almost no checks and balances in UK government. It is nothing like the US Congress. The Lords can delay bills for a shorttime, but cannot stop them. Here, they might have delayed it into the period of proroguation, but they greased it through.
Richard they are denying the voters an election in order to deny the voters of the referendum.Why no abolish voting altogether.Be very worried you next.
Really?More like making sure they get their EU pension money There should not be a financial motivation when it comes to these votes
Should we expect this principle of ignoring the public vote and MPs doing what they think is in "the national interest" when it comes to the General Election too? You know, "never mind that we're in a losing party, we're going to do what's in the 'national interest'". Obviously, you can't have these pesky members of the public poking their noses into our parliamentary democracy with their voting nonsense - who do they think they are??
Good.
Tik Tok March 29 2020 is coming... Brexit Day hueheh!!
Doesn't bother this Brit... I'm staying in, and there's not much anyone can do about it.
oh dear boris....what now?
where else can you see a bunch of blokes so desperately trying to refuse the fact that they are going bald?
What a charade.......disgraceful.
People are supposed to be wiser when there older. That rule does not apply in the case of these old farts.
House of lords essential balance the bipartisan debate in the house of commons.remember the house of Lords adds wisdom and parliamentary experience.Other than a limited delaying of bills from becoming acts it does not pass laws
the house of lords is not by the people so how can it be for the people another unelected body thinking that they know better.
My Name not well educated and ill informed voters know better for sure...
@@mavericktamu so I guess you're making the sweeping generalisation that people voted for brexit are somehow thick? the level of snobbery in you're post shows that you clearly don't understand their perspective or motivations.
My Name I did NOT call anyone thick. Chip on your shoulder, perhaps?
@@mavericktamu the implication was there, I voted remain but at least I'm able to accept the results of the referendum, and respect my fellow countrymen's decision.
Europa unida
I must say, u brits really have a nice looking clock there
Well done, good job
Finally the House of Lords is good for something!
who elected these old white guys
You wouldn`t say that if they weren`t white.
The FOR BRITAIN party would abolish the House of Lords.
Absolute buffoonery !!
Guess who profits from no deal? Borris Johnson, Reece-Mogg and Gove (among others) via hedge funds. His own brother says he isn't acting in the national interest. Needs to be stopped by whoever can.
His brother is a remainer. His brothers wife works at the guardian news paper which is far left extreemist.
Piers Corbyn? I accept the point that brothers disagree. But BoJo have worked together for years and all of a sudden when borris has all the power Jo says he can't be trusted ? That's his lifelong political ally saying that!!
Voted this video down 👍
gaylords.