Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400ST Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
  • Dylan of Bijou Diamond Jewellery reviews the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 41mm in steel (ref. 15400ST.OO.1220ST.03). He talks through the history of the Royal Oak and how it is so influential in the history of watchmaking. He also looks at the features of this specific model and how the Royal Oak has changed since it's release in 1972. Stay tuned for more watch reviews.
    If you are interested in this piece or any other pieces in the Audemars Piguet collection then don't hesitate to contact the Bijou team for more information.
    Discover our jewellery collections on our website: www.bijoudiamondjewellery.com
    Sign up to The Watch Room (www.bijoudiamondjewellery.com/...) to see what pieces we have available.
    E: info@bijoudiamondjewellery.com
    T: 02033195993
    Instagram: @bijoudiamonds & @dylan.bijou
    ( / bijoudiamonds )
    ( / dylan.bijou )
    Facebook:
    ( / bijoudiamonds )
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @ianmedium
    @ianmedium 5 років тому +13

    Just one suggestion. I love your videos but there is so much repetition when it comes to Royal Oak models, the clasp, the bracelet, the history. Perhaps you could make a shorter video for the individual models and just reference past reviews of the other models for the information on the bracelet and history. I must admit I skipped through nearly all of this which is a shame as I probably missed the pertinent parts pertaining to this model in its own right.

    • @tonyf3100
      @tonyf3100 5 років тому +6

      Agree. Video started at 5:00 minute mark for me. I think best alternative is to include a link to your old videos for viewers who are new to the channel and focus on the individual model.

    • @fickoffduck675
      @fickoffduck675 5 років тому +4

      Agree, we’ve all heard the history over and over about the sports watch crisis, just show the watch and give the review. Make separate history videos, and if you need the reviews to go over 10 mins for $ purposes then just show the watch more

    • @kazmanscoop
      @kazmanscoop 5 років тому +3

      100% agree. They're all running out of things to say (all the watch channels)

    • @BijouDiamondJewellery
      @BijouDiamondJewellery  5 років тому +5

      Hi Ianmedium, thank you for your comment. I'm sorry you feel this way about the history and structure of our videos. I like to keep them all the same style and structure as we have had a great response from doing that as people know what they're watching. I do reference the more in-depth history videos as you suggested, this video actually featured a more basic version of the Royal Oak's history with parts relating specifically to this model, a more in-depth version was linked. Our subscribers have a varying levels of knowledge so we like to ensure everyone can gain something from our videos. It appears that our channel may not be what you're looking for and we very sad to hear that, hopefully you can take something from some of our videos.
      Thanks
      Dylan
      Bijou Diamond Jewellery

  • @cringe9406
    @cringe9406 5 років тому +5

    Beautiful watch! I bought mine back in october 2018, wore it almost everyday since today, beautiful and tough watch, the only issue i have is a screw on the lock tabs falling off, so i ended up losing one of my lock tabs. I personally think this is unacceptable for a watch of this price range, but then i looked around the internet and noticed that it was a common issues with the 15400, AP got it covered under warranty so I'm still happy with it.

  • @chrisnguyen3647
    @chrisnguyen3647 5 років тому +1

    Really enjoyed the video and background history. Thank you. Definitely a future buy.

  • @darrelltuttle8298
    @darrelltuttle8298 5 років тому +2

    Yes, yes, yes, I'd buy that particular watch in the video. It's beautiful.

  • @lugscogs5976
    @lugscogs5976 5 років тому +3

    Definitely my dream watch

  • @robs4574
    @robs4574 5 років тому

    I adore this watch. This watch with the white dial is what I’m going to get next.

  • @TimG--
    @TimG-- 5 років тому +3

    Nice review mate

  • @geroldatlarge1841
    @geroldatlarge1841 5 років тому

    Yes. I’ll take two thank you .

  • @rujinabegum4764
    @rujinabegum4764 5 років тому +2

    15300 had the best case size.

  • @MattVLRocks
    @MattVLRocks 5 років тому

    Does anyone know the retail of this particular watch ( in AUD)? I see quite a few second hand for sale though I understand there is quite a premium in the second hand market. Any information would be greatly appreciated!

  • @damachine3
    @damachine3 5 років тому +2

    First! Nice piece.

  • @nicholascarvajalhult7235
    @nicholascarvajalhult7235 5 років тому +1

    This or a Submariner for everyday wear?

  • @j.burgess4459
    @j.burgess4459 5 років тому

    Damn, those things are fine! Only an Aquanaut equals it. Only a Nautilus beats it.

  • @keitumetsemabuza9940
    @keitumetsemabuza9940 5 років тому +2

    Blue dial, all the way

  • @Goonerz88
    @Goonerz88 5 років тому +1

    I like this watch but it seems more like jewellery and I'd be worried about damaging it . I've always had Rolex sports watches . Could anyone tell me the difference between the two ? What an amazing looking watch though the AP is .

    • @jacknicholls9679
      @jacknicholls9679 5 років тому

      Arsenal FC Rolex is lake a Mercedes Benz and AP and PP are like rolls Royce

  • @robertschmidt9584
    @robertschmidt9584 4 роки тому

    Grey dial.

  • @FrankLee-qd3hy
    @FrankLee-qd3hy 5 років тому

    So the 2 AP Royal Oaks I saw for sale on offer up for $100 and the other for $200 were probably "replica" watches... Drat.

  • @SupremeNYC33
    @SupremeNYC33 5 років тому +4

    You should mention that this model will be replaced this year

    • @BijouDiamondJewellery
      @BijouDiamondJewellery  5 років тому +1

      Hi Ted, thank you for your comment. 15500 is a supplement model to the range and Audemars Piguet has yet to announce if and when the 15400 will be replaced.

    • @SupremeNYC33
      @SupremeNYC33 5 років тому +1

      I've read ref. 15500 is replacing the ref. 15400@@BijouDiamondJewellery

  • @Soorma1988
    @Soorma1988 5 років тому

    Jubilee and Presidential bracelet over this any day!

  • @kazmanscoop
    @kazmanscoop 5 років тому +3

    All the watch channels have run out of things to say and watches to review. They keep repeating reviews of the same watches, trying to come up with new topics like 'Rolex price bubble bursting'
    Bring on Basel World

    • @ianmedium
      @ianmedium 5 років тому +1

      Kazzamatazz exactly. I used to watch all the usual suspects and watch none of them now, “Quartz is rubbish, this sports watch is better than that sports watch, this unheard of micro brand that micro brand, is it worth it?” I could go on, they plow the same field over and over till all that’s left is dust and their pointless ill informed opinions. I tend to just watch the guys who repair vintage watches now. I liked this channel but am going off it as I can only take so much of how wonderful an AP,s clasp is! :)

    • @kazmanscoop
      @kazmanscoop 5 років тому

      @@ianmedium it's the best clasp in the industry don't you know? 😂 Hahaha
      My thoughts exactly. 👏
      I bet he does another Royal Oak 'review' video this year.
      I will say that I still find Watchfinders video still mildly informative, although how many more ultra-close-ups of a A. Lange & Sohne chronograph I can take I don't know!!

    • @BijouDiamondJewellery
      @BijouDiamondJewellery  5 років тому +3

      Hi, thank you for your comment. This watch was yet to be reviewed on our channel and we have had a lot of requests from subscribers to review it.

    • @BijouDiamondJewellery
      @BijouDiamondJewellery  5 років тому +4

      @@kazmanscoop We're sorry you feel this way, the Royal Oak is a very popular model for us so we will continue to give it coverage.

    • @kazmanscoop
      @kazmanscoop 5 років тому

      @@BijouDiamondJewellery Dylan ive praised your watch reviews in the past because I enjoy your content and your presentation style. But let's be honest, you and Federico and Theo and Harris and all the watch guys are running out of new things to talk about. And whilst you haven't reviewed this particular reference before, it's still a Royal Oak which is something you've talked about extensively. You mainly just review Rolexes and Royal Oak. If you haven't got anything new to add then just take a break for a few weeks.