I believe the missing component to artificial intelligence where been looking for is the lack of a subconscious; data inaccessible to the conscious about itself and the processes on how it senses and interprets reality. And that the soul is not real or physical, it's a sense of individuality (self awareness) which requires a subconscious to accomplish as it(the entity) needs a singular focus to give value to the subconscious and vise versa as they push and influence one another to learn, adapt, evolve, and understand. I think Mr. Hideaki Anno realizes this too, with Shinji and Gendo. One of them works like a subconscious and reacts and calculates at lightning speeds with little emotion, understanding, or humanity behind it. The other focuses far too hard on particular topics and bogs himself down trying to understand everything around him and winds up getting nowhere in reality. But when they get together they accomplish things beyond what any one person could ever accomplish. Excellent video as usual Stef. Keep em coming!
I hate when media goes all "these robots are just like us!!!" but then never goes into detail on how they're made, developed, or programmed. I'm looking at you, Fallout 4.
Excellent video, I'd love to see you go ahead and make that video on quantum computing though as I believe it's a key reason as to why the singularity may actually be possible.
If i'm not mistaken quantum computing is simply a means in which information is transmitted and i'm not sure that a technological singularity would result just because of this, since, as stated in the video, the process of thought from a computer relies on inputs from a programmer. While the possibility for an incredibly "intelligent" artificial intelligence, it would not have the same sense of self identity that a human would. It could be programmed to "act" like a human, but it may never be able to "be" like a human. Now idk if this could be circumvented by transferring someone's mental processes into digital code, or having someone's thought processes synthesized into digital code, replicated and put into a computer (were it possible), but based on the current understanding of programable intelligence it would be impossible to have a computer possess anything more than a type of pseudo-intelligence.
Technological Singularity is not necessarily based on autonomous AI. It's based on the idea of minds upgrading themselves. It could be human minds, and most likely is a combination of AI and human mind. Ghost in the Shell is a good example, you can see Motoko is reborn as a Transhuman.
Non-deterministic beings like humans are something really weird once you think about it. It's much easier to imagine a universe with only deterministic elements on it. But then it seems impossible to me to have an observer inside this same universe, as consciousness feels intrinsically related to free will, and this one to non-deterministic behaviour
Humans are deterministic, in my view. They just have too much alternative programs in them. Imagine if AI acts more or less linear while a human has a few linear patterns, switching between each other.
How do you know humans aren't deterministic? Couldn't it be argued that they only appear in-deterministic to us because we have no way to process all of the variables that go into them?
Being a software engineer student myself, I've noticed that most of my classmates that do really well in programming and logic are really into anime and manga. Why the hell is that? Anyway, i appreciate this video, tough it seemed a little to rambly for me. Maybe it's because i've already heard many of the points you made here. Still, good job, you are very eloquent, a trait that's very rare in software developers and programmers. (Sorry for bad english)
***** I understand what you mean, but i don't think it's that. I've met a whole lot of "nerds" that no matter how much they try they can't figure out the basics. I believe there's something deeper, something about the way these guys are wired that allows them to see code and abstract language as something friendly and intuitive, and at the same time, makes them interested in anime. Anyway this wasn't the topic of this video, maybe ***** will tackle this particular topic in the future.
It seems to me that you have the perfect life. Your a software engineer who is good at art; that's basically my dream life. P.S. You also have a bunch of evangelion stuff.
I second this. Combining two opposite gifts like art and math is awesome. It must be like an ability to view the world in two ways simultaneously! (well, I may be exaggerating the whole thing, but still)
I was under the assumption that the AI singularity referred to the moment when an AI not restricted by the power and speed limitations of a human brain surpasses humanity due to having the capability to learn and process information at an inconceivably fast rate but not autonomously, still following it's initial programming. Naturally this sort of AI wouldn't be human-like at all as it wouldn't have any emotions and would merely continue to do as it's initial programming indicated, however it would be capable of communication, reasoning and problem solving perhaps even being able to answer questions humanity would never have been capable of answering; the only concern with this type of AI is it's initial programming, if we are not meticulous during it's construction phase we may end up with an undesirable super computer that has no off button. I personally hold the belief that human emotions are fundamentally dangerous and humanity shouldn't seek to reproduce it within AI to begin with, if we created an AI that's hardware was identical to a human body and by extension capable of moving identically to humans, whilst being capable of asking and answering questions (holding a conversation/following orders) then that would be the ideal form of AI for humanity. I do wonder what people's fascination with free will in AI is to begin with, I personally find it incredibly undesirable for a multitude of reasons. As for how close we are until something like this becomes more then a concept I would argue that every person's estimations including this videos creator is pointless conjecture, we don't know where the boundaries of technology lay and although it's possible to have an educated guess we are still having technological breakthroughs constantly so there is simply not enough information, it could be incredibly soon or no where near. I may be mistaken but I believe somewhere in the video it was implied that there is something that makes up humanity that is impossible to understand (the soul) and I firmly believe that anything we don't understand about ourselves will be revealed in a matter of time thanks to the efforts of hardworking scientists and nothing about humanity is out of our reach or incomprehensible given enough time (just my 2c).
Sadly, I think humans are just as deterministic as robots. Comepletely. We just have more "alternative thinking patters" between which we are switching and which we compare. For some reason, we think robots must think and do everything linearly while they could think as broadly as we, humans. Happiness? Just a high tempo of thinking. Programming robots to use slow\entangled thinking and fast\enthusiastic thinking and you will get sadness and happiness. Add assosiations to that mode and make a robot's (just like man's) happiness personal. Randomness? Well, randomness is just explained by attachment to surroundings. We depend on weather, flavours, random sounds, other people and their moods thousands of unnecessary thing that can easily make our consciousness switch from one thinking pattern to another. If we program robots to depend on all these "unsignificant" criteria, they will be just as "genuinely random" as humans. So, there is just absolutely no difference.
Dude your videos are awesome, keep doing this please, your work is one of the best things i ever seen in this plataform, so please just keep going. PD : Your cat is the real star of your channel. :3
You don't need a census agreement or anything of the sort to establish an objective standard of good or bad. Moral good or bad with respect to the general well-being of human beings is in itself a provable and reliable moral objective standard. This includes historical contexts of actions or behavior that have had a negative or positive impact on the well-being and success of people. Example: taking or hindering someone's right to live has and always will have a provable negative impact on someone's or other's well-being, therefore it can be sad that murder and slavery are, objectively speaking, bad. This can be applied to not just actions but behaviors and characteristics.
So fucking true, holy shit I'm fucking done, check mate. Humans are dumb, now I know what you meant by census agreement not always being accurate or "good". Programming concepts will never work, especially if its varies from ethnicity, country and or religion.
What? The objective moral standard i discussed has nothing to do and is completely incompatible with religions that hold moral views that are dictated by their respective literature or deity. That's the very definition of the objective moral standard. It's unaffected or skewered by any predisposed views on morality.
Someone had to have created religion to begin with though, so someone had to have thought those allegedly false morals without the influence of religion (because it obviously didn't exist yet) which disproves your whole theory.
Yes, but whether or not those religious views can hold up to the moral objective standard of the general well-being of people is the question you should be asking. One could argue that historically Islam, or specific characteristics of it, has had a generally negative impact on the well-being of its followers (based purely on recent and historical events regarding the Middle East region).
If you really break it down, humans are a combination of DNA and environmental factors. A person with the exact same DNA and the exact same environmental factors would be just as deterministic as a robot. There is also a point to be made about quantum computing but I agree that it is a more complicated subject than can be addressed in a UA-cam comment. There are a few other points I don't quite agree on, but overall, great video!
Wow. This is a more intellectual look into the concepts of AI. Personally, I agree with you in the sense that I doubt AI is anywhere near programable right now. The big hurdle as you mentioned is because of the paradoxical statement of programming an AI. I personally think there is no way of producing an analytical equation for an AI's function without the the appearance of truly random variables (which I think you were getting at). From what I seen, most people try to quantify "living" phenomena only using statistical approximations. For example, determining if fish are social creatures by measuring the local proximity of two fish in a tank. Then plotting the numerous experimental data and fitting them with statistical tools. I think the closest we can get to producing an AI right now is to measure human behavior (the general logic that people follow, however we can qualify that), fit this data using statistical algorithms, and use this as the basic function for the AI. Of course, this doesn't create a true AI. It can only create a machine that acts "human" based on the actions of countless other humans. Of course, it won't have "self awareness" or know why it would do its actions.
Believe it or not, 4 years ago I was searching for the music around 10:00 and I'm still looking for it x). So if you happen to know it, I am ready to pay u to know.
What you left out is a self learning programm. We develope those too, even right now as we speak. But as you said, first 2 steps are gonna start slow but once it knows how to programm itself or how to analyze stuff, it will leave us behind in a blink of an eye. But first, it has to develop human lvl, and something like willpower. Humans need freedom to get a strong willpower, and with willpower comes arrogance, a natural evolution.
Is there any way to find music you've used in older videos? I just went throught the almost 200 songs in your soundcloud with no luck. Specifically i'm trying to find the track that starts at 4:40 in "Evangelion Finale Explained: Why Choking?"
cool that you are also interested AI as well. I watched some videos about how that if we instill a efficiency system in an artificial intelligence it would seek to optimize that efficiency like you said, which could in turn lead to it creating progressively more advanced versions of itself (like you said). But I think that machines wouldn't have to be random in order for an artificial intelligence system to exist. While the intelligence may never have emotions or empathy or anything like that (like you said) it wouldn't need it as the AI would most likely have a driving purpose. Also many researchers are attempting to replicate a human brain by sort of mimicking the way neurons work (I forgot the name of the project but it's in Britain I think). Anyway i just think that an artifical intelligence could be created but it would likely not have free will in a sense and the worst thing it might do would be to carry out its efficiency program to insane (lol machines arent insane) measures. anyway cool vid, liked your arguments
/dev/random on linux (and probably other unix-like OSes) provides randomness seeded from device noise and stuff like that, and is supposedly indistinguishable from true randomness. on windows you HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\RNG\Seed which is similarly generated from device noise. both are regularly reseeded but I guess you could argue that even these aren't truly random although very close
When you say that humans have a quality of being truly random, could it be that we are simply following an algorithm based on environmental variables and genetic components that were formed through millions (or billions) of years of mutational processes? Could it be that nothing occurs truly at random and everything results from a coded cause and effect that has been set since the dawn of time and we simply don't have the ability to comprehend this process?
i was actually just thinking about AI and sentience earlier i think that actually a human brain is actually the same as a computer in the sense that it doesn't do random and everything a person does can be predicted, a human brain is just simply too complicated to predict or deconstruct realistically. the way i see it a computer is no different to a human brain, they both take in information, put it into calculations and then try to make use of it. as you said emotions are just chemical reactions, the chemicals change the way the brain thinks dynamically and the release of the chemicals is determined by past experiences. the pseudo random in a human brain comes from life experiences, every teeny weeny little experience can have a large effect on how the brain makes future decisions. emotions are predictable and so is everything else in a human brain. i think if a baby was born in a test tube and its eyes were permanently closed, it had no senses other than its brain being connected to a computer terminal allowing you to interact with it the same way you would a computer the person (or brain) would act just like a computer without any outside stimulation to give it dynamism. if you could make a computer that is able to change how it makes all future decisions based on the outcomes of every tiny little experience without its own awareness of the fact (a subconscious) it would be able to act just like a human. based on the outcomes of experiences it would grow likes and dislikes, feelings and opinions and its own human like quirks, and as it learns about its own life it would become an unpredictable individual just like a human.
I loved the video, but maybe you should have more calm scenes when you talk about some of the more complex ideas. I kinda got lost in what was going on on the screen and had to rewind to understand you. And in general the less things that are on screen to more focused i am on what you are saying. Anyway great video and keep up the good work.
what about advancements in machine learning? I'm curious if you've changed your mind since the upload. I disagree with many of your points but I'm bad at making arguments. As a side thought, -our brains work by the laws of physics, and computers work by the laws of logic. what if we can write logic that interacts with reality (like making a random number generator from nature and have a computer read that data) what if, like us, we can make a computer who's logic relies on exterior factors? It's just a thought I think it's dumb to assume programmers would do this 'just because' but it's fun to think about things.
I challenge you with this. Human are basically just big meat computers that run on highly complex algorithms that in reality aren't that complex at all. Quite simple actually. We just have built up this thing we call consciousness as a way of coping with the amount of the stimuli we take in. Trying to make a computer now with consciousness would be like trying to run "No Man's Sky" on an analog computer made of gears. To make a computer with consciousness you'd need to replicate all of a stimuli a human takes in and plug it into a computer until it works.
ever thought of making an angel's egg video? maybe explaining whats up with the fucking movie? or making something like the thing you did with eva. I just finished watching it and didnt understand shit i love you bye
Wouldn't you be able to replicate a brain if you could process one byte for every neuron in the brain REALLY fast? then study the neurons in a baby's brain to figure out how early development works in the brain and replicate those early Neurons with 1s and 0s?
Don't you think we are limited somehow by our DNA? I find it interesting to compare the DNA to an algorithm. In someway is how we are programmed, we are chemical reactions at the end. The way our noradrenaline, serotonin, dopamine work is how we see the world and I'm not only talking about mental illness, I'm actually questioning free will at some point.
I believe the missing component to artificial intelligence where been looking for is the lack of a subconscious; data inaccessible to the conscious about itself and the processes on how it senses and interprets reality. And that the soul is not real or physical, it's a sense of individuality (self awareness) which requires a subconscious to accomplish as it(the entity) needs a singular focus to give value to the subconscious and vise versa as they push and influence one another to learn, adapt, evolve, and understand.
I think Mr. Hideaki Anno realizes this too, with Shinji and Gendo. One of them works like a subconscious and reacts and calculates at lightning speeds with little emotion, understanding, or humanity behind it. The other focuses far too hard on particular topics and bogs himself down trying to understand everything around him and winds up getting nowhere in reality. But when they get together they accomplish things beyond what any one person could ever accomplish.
Excellent video as usual Stef. Keep em coming!
half an hour of Stef talking about science, bless
This is a lot more relevant now.
I hate when media goes all "these robots are just like us!!!" but then never goes into detail on how they're made, developed, or programmed. I'm looking at you, Fallout 4.
All this smart talk is too much. I just came here for your cat.
Excellent video, I'd love to see you go ahead and make that video on quantum computing though as I believe it's a key reason as to why the singularity may actually be possible.
If i'm not mistaken quantum computing is simply a means in which information is transmitted and i'm not sure that a technological singularity would result just because of this, since, as stated in the video, the process of thought from a computer relies on inputs from a programmer. While the possibility for an incredibly "intelligent" artificial intelligence, it would not have the same sense of self identity that a human would. It could be programmed to "act" like a human, but it may never be able to "be" like a human.
Now idk if this could be circumvented by transferring someone's mental processes into digital code, or having someone's thought processes synthesized into digital code, replicated and put into a computer (were it possible), but based on the current understanding of programable intelligence it would be impossible to have a computer possess anything more than a type of pseudo-intelligence.
I love this fucking channel.
Technological Singularity is not necessarily based on autonomous AI.
It's based on the idea of minds upgrading themselves. It could be human minds, and most likely is a combination of AI and human mind. Ghost in the Shell is a good example, you can see Motoko is reborn as a Transhuman.
Non-deterministic beings like humans are something really weird once you think about it. It's much easier to imagine a universe with only deterministic elements on it. But then it seems impossible to me to have an observer inside this same universe, as consciousness feels intrinsically related to free will, and this one to non-deterministic behaviour
Humans are deterministic, in my view. They just have too much alternative programs in them. Imagine if AI acts more or less linear while a human has a few linear patterns, switching between each other.
How do you know humans aren't deterministic? Couldn't it be argued that they only appear in-deterministic to us because we have no way to process all of the variables that go into them?
I don't think that possibility is enough to sustain that claim though.
That Code:Geass blurb triggered the fuck out of me.
A Legend of the Galactic Heroes for the average Joe but, with such a solid base, no wonder it's decend
+sudoStef you're truly amazing
Being a software engineer student myself, I've noticed that most of my classmates that do really well in programming and logic are really into anime and manga. Why the hell is that?
Anyway, i appreciate this video, tough it seemed a little to rambly for me. Maybe it's because i've already heard many of the points you made here. Still, good job, you are very eloquent, a trait that's very rare in software developers and programmers.
(Sorry for bad english)
The short answer is probably because most of us are nerds who spend tons of time online.
Yeah... Probably just it really
inb4 "it's cuz it's smart"
It's a little something called the Autism Gene, lad.
***** I understand what you mean, but i don't think it's that. I've met a whole lot of "nerds" that no matter how much they try they can't figure out the basics.
I believe there's something deeper, something about the way these guys are wired that allows them to see code and abstract language as something friendly and intuitive, and at the same time, makes them interested in anime.
Anyway this wasn't the topic of this video, maybe ***** will tackle this particular topic in the future.
Fantastic and intresting as usual Stef! Keep up the good work!
Man, you need to make more videos like this one!
Thoroughly interesting. Looking forward to similar content.
interesting seeing you here lol thank you for teaching me sheik
Never stop man this channel is gold.
It seems to me that you have the perfect life. Your a software engineer who is good at art; that's basically my dream life.
P.S. You also have a bunch of evangelion stuff.
I second this. Combining two opposite gifts like art and math is awesome. It must be like an ability to view the world in two ways simultaneously! (well, I may be exaggerating the whole thing, but still)
No coffee but still props for the Evangelion clips and the bit at the end love your videos
fantastic and eclectic art style, coolio
this is one of the best youtube video i´ve ever seen and i think everybody who is interested in this topic should have seen it
I was under the assumption that the AI singularity referred to the moment when an AI not restricted by the power and speed limitations of a human brain surpasses humanity due to having the capability to learn and process information at an inconceivably fast rate but not autonomously, still following it's initial programming. Naturally this sort of AI wouldn't be human-like at all as it wouldn't have any emotions and would merely continue to do as it's initial programming indicated, however it would be capable of communication, reasoning and problem solving perhaps even being able to answer questions humanity would never have been capable of answering; the only concern with this type of AI is it's initial programming, if we are not meticulous during it's construction phase we may end up with an undesirable super computer that has no off button.
I personally hold the belief that human emotions are fundamentally dangerous and humanity shouldn't seek to reproduce it within AI to begin with, if we created an AI that's hardware was identical to a human body and by extension capable of moving identically to humans, whilst being capable of asking and answering questions (holding a conversation/following orders) then that would be the ideal form of AI for humanity. I do wonder what people's fascination with free will in AI is to begin with, I personally find it incredibly undesirable for a multitude of reasons. As for how close we are until something like this becomes more then a concept I would argue that every person's estimations including this videos creator is pointless conjecture, we don't know where the boundaries of technology lay and although it's possible to have an educated guess we are still having technological breakthroughs constantly so there is simply not enough information, it could be incredibly soon or no where near.
I may be mistaken but I believe somewhere in the video it was implied that there is something that makes up humanity that is impossible to understand (the soul) and I firmly believe that anything we don't understand about ourselves will be revealed in a matter of time thanks to the efforts of hardworking scientists and nothing about humanity is out of our reach or incomprehensible given enough time (just my 2c).
Just wanted to say that I really appreciate your videos. Keep up the good work!
Maybe the question we should be asking isn't whether or not code can replicate life, but if life itself is code?
you deserve more subscribers. your content is so amazing.
this is so beyond quality compared to every other video on youtube. please. continue.
Holy Shit !! Top notch !!!! Great Writing , Awsome edit, Well Structured!!!!
Sadly, I think humans are just as deterministic as robots. Comepletely. We just have more "alternative thinking patters" between which we are switching and which we compare. For some reason, we think robots must think and do everything linearly while they could think as broadly as we, humans.
Happiness? Just a high tempo of thinking. Programming robots to use slow\entangled thinking and fast\enthusiastic thinking and you will get sadness and happiness. Add assosiations to that mode and make a robot's (just like man's) happiness personal.
Randomness? Well, randomness is just explained by attachment to surroundings. We depend on weather, flavours, random sounds, other people and their moods thousands of unnecessary thing that can easily make our consciousness switch from one thinking pattern to another.
If we program robots to depend on all these "unsignificant" criteria, they will be just as "genuinely random" as humans.
So, there is just absolutely no difference.
Oh God the subtle Steins;Gate music 'Observer' inclusion through me through way too many emotions...
I love how your channel is a physics & philosophy channel disguised as an anime reviewing channel
hey whats the music at 3:15?
Dude your videos are awesome, keep doing this please, your work is one of the best things i ever seen in this plataform, so please just keep going.
PD : Your cat is the real star of your channel. :3
Im so glad that i subscribed you some time ago. Great video.
please make more videos
Where r u from dud?
dude i love your intros where you walk around with your camera, its hilarious keep up the videos hopefully you blow up in subscribers 👍
love your content man
that cat always looks so grumpy
Good timing, I just got around to watching Ghost in the Shell today. I like philosophical discussions of what makes me "me."
Such a great video !
Thank you.
Great video man, keep up the good work
Which song were you using at 3:15? It feels incredibly familiar.
Your finest work!
Great video. Keep up the good work.
You don't need a census agreement or anything of the sort to establish an objective standard of good or bad. Moral good or bad with respect to the general well-being of human beings is in itself a provable and reliable moral objective standard. This includes historical contexts of actions or behavior that have had a negative or positive impact on the well-being and success of people. Example: taking or hindering someone's right to live has and always will have a provable negative impact on someone's or other's well-being, therefore it can be sad that murder and slavery are, objectively speaking, bad. This can be applied to not just actions but behaviors and characteristics.
So fucking true, holy shit I'm fucking done, check mate. Humans are dumb, now I know what you meant by census agreement not always being accurate or "good". Programming concepts will never work, especially if its varies from ethnicity, country and or religion.
What? The objective moral standard i discussed has nothing to do and is completely incompatible with religions that hold moral views that are dictated by their respective literature or deity. That's the very definition of the objective moral standard. It's unaffected or skewered by any predisposed views on morality.
i'm muslim
Someone had to have created religion to begin with though, so someone had to have thought those allegedly false morals without the influence of religion (because it obviously didn't exist yet) which disproves your whole theory.
Yes, but whether or not those religious views can hold up to the moral objective standard of the general well-being of people is the question you should be asking. One could argue that historically Islam, or specific characteristics of it, has had a generally negative impact on the well-being of its followers (based purely on recent and historical events regarding the Middle East region).
If you really break it down, humans are a combination of DNA and environmental factors. A person with the exact same DNA and the exact same environmental factors would be just as deterministic as a robot. There is also a point to be made about quantum computing but I agree that it is a more complicated subject than can be addressed in a UA-cam comment. There are a few other points I don't quite agree on, but overall, great video!
Damn the CG in I, Robot is dated. Also this is one of the best channels on youtube.
I got fangasm when Texhnolyze's ost started playing and you talked about unhumanazing parts of technology. You should do video about this show.
Fantastic video, thank you!
Nice video, what is the music in the background at around 10:00 ?
Wow you're really good at drawing
Wow. This is a more intellectual look into the concepts of AI. Personally, I agree with you in the sense that I doubt AI is anywhere near programable right now. The big hurdle as you mentioned is because of the paradoxical statement of programming an AI. I personally think there is no way of producing an analytical equation for an AI's function without the the appearance of truly random variables (which I think you were getting at).
From what I seen, most people try to quantify "living" phenomena only using statistical approximations. For example, determining if fish are social creatures by measuring the local proximity of two fish in a tank. Then plotting the numerous experimental data and fitting them with statistical tools.
I think the closest we can get to producing an AI right now is to measure human behavior (the general logic that people follow, however we can qualify that), fit this data using statistical algorithms, and use this as the basic function for the AI. Of course, this doesn't create a true AI. It can only create a machine that acts "human" based on the actions of countless other humans. Of course, it won't have "self awareness" or know why it would do its actions.
Oh the eva music. Thank you KamiStefan
Believe it or not, 4 years ago I was searching for the music around 10:00 and I'm still looking for it x). So if you happen to know it, I am ready to pay u to know.
it's from serial experiments lain
ua-cam.com/video/sUiBjiC_A9U/v-deo.html
赤毛 woww thank you so much !!!! U R my savior.
What you left out is a self learning programm. We develope those too, even right now as we speak. But as you said, first 2 steps are gonna start slow but once it knows how to programm itself or how to analyze stuff, it will leave us behind in a blink of an eye. But first, it has to develop human lvl, and something like willpower. Humans need freedom to get a strong willpower, and with willpower comes arrogance, a natural evolution.
Wow. This must of taken so long to make.
Wow, I learned a lot from this. Interesting points :)
this is the same person who made evangelion boi goes fast as fuck
Love this kind of video.
Is there any way to find music you've used in older videos? I just went throught the almost 200 songs in your soundcloud with no luck. Specifically i'm trying to find the track that starts at 4:40 in "Evangelion Finale Explained: Why Choking?"
Thank you kindly
Jeez sudostef you have a lot of talent in multiple areas
cool that you are also interested AI as well. I watched some videos about how that if we instill a efficiency system in an artificial intelligence it would seek to optimize that efficiency like you said, which could in turn lead to it creating progressively more advanced versions of itself (like you said). But I think that machines wouldn't have to be random in order for an artificial intelligence system to exist. While the intelligence may never have emotions or empathy or anything like that (like you said) it wouldn't need it as the AI would most likely have a driving purpose. Also many researchers are attempting to replicate a human brain by sort of mimicking the way neurons work (I forgot the name of the project but it's in Britain I think). Anyway i just think that an artifical intelligence could be created but it would likely not have free will in a sense and the worst thing it might do would be to carry out its efficiency program to insane (lol machines arent insane) measures. anyway cool vid, liked your arguments
/dev/random on linux (and probably other unix-like OSes) provides randomness seeded from device noise and stuff like that, and is supposedly indistinguishable from true randomness. on windows you HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\RNG\Seed which is similarly generated from device noise. both are regularly reseeded but I guess you could argue that even these aren't truly random although very close
Love your cat, so fluffy and chubby, you should make a vlog of it
Another amazing video
Could you link or idea the ambient instrumental of My Heart Will Go On by Celine Dion used in this video pls?
So you are a sotfware engineer
is it possible to program a machine to understand things like the natural rights(jusnaturalism)?
0:16 poor cat, scaring it with papers!
Holy shit your good at drawling my dude
really loved this video
6:10 I'd like to point out that fuzzy logic is a thing
I'm been trying to explain this for years...
I was expecting my postcard in intro ;-;
could you scan that chicken and post it ? I'd like it for my wallpaper
at last of your video, your cat, so cute XD
which movies are shown in the background?
The scary part isnt making an AI with an IQ of 150, its making an AI with an IQ or 10 that has access to things it shouldnt.
When you say that humans have a quality of being truly random, could it be that we are simply following an algorithm based on environmental variables and genetic components that were formed through millions (or billions) of years of mutational processes?
Could it be that nothing occurs truly at random and everything results from a coded cause and effect that has been set since the dawn of time and we simply don't have the ability to comprehend this process?
Please do a video on Ergo Proxy.
Did you remove your Shinji choking Asuka video?
i was actually just thinking about AI and sentience earlier
i think that actually a human brain is actually the same as a computer in the sense that it doesn't do random and everything a person does can be predicted, a human brain is just simply too complicated to predict or deconstruct realistically.
the way i see it a computer is no different to a human brain, they both take in information, put it into calculations and then try to make use of it.
as you said emotions are just chemical reactions, the chemicals change the way the brain thinks dynamically and the release of the chemicals is determined by past experiences.
the pseudo random in a human brain comes from life experiences, every teeny weeny little experience can have a large effect on how the brain makes future decisions.
emotions are predictable and so is everything else in a human brain.
i think if a baby was born in a test tube and its eyes were permanently closed, it had no senses other than its brain being connected to a computer terminal allowing you to interact with it the same way you would a computer the person (or brain) would act just like a computer without any outside stimulation to give it dynamism.
if you could make a computer that is able to change how it makes all future decisions based on the outcomes of every tiny little experience without its own awareness of the fact (a subconscious) it would be able to act just like a human.
based on the outcomes of experiences it would grow likes and dislikes, feelings and opinions and its own human like quirks, and as it learns about its own life it would become an unpredictable individual just like a human.
you sound gay, are you gay?
ples stop the bully
i wish i knew what everything in this video was, lotsa cool looking stuff
The turkey likes it.
Bloody good video
hey stef, is there anything about the EVA's that some people aren't aware of that you could talk about?
This reminded me of Rick and Morty if anything.
So whens that Berserk video?
I loved the video, but maybe you should have more calm scenes when you talk about some of the more complex ideas.
I kinda got lost in what was going on on the screen and had to rewind to understand you.
And in general the less things that are on screen to more focused i am on what you are saying.
Anyway great video and keep up the good work.
Yay AIs. Finally I can have a robot waifu.
Man you and your channel are like "Exurb1a"
Texhnolyze video when?
did i actually find someone smart on the internet?
'Scuuuuuse you, its a cloaca not an ass, thank you very much
lotta based movie taste in this vid
what about advancements in machine learning? I'm curious if you've changed your mind since the upload.
I disagree with many of your points but I'm bad at making arguments. As a side thought, -our brains work by the laws of physics, and computers work by the laws of logic. what if we can write logic that interacts with reality (like making a random number generator from nature and have a computer read that data) what if, like us, we can make a computer who's logic relies on exterior factors? It's just a thought I think it's dumb to assume programmers would do this 'just because' but it's fun to think about things.
I challenge you with this. Human are basically just big meat computers that run on highly complex algorithms that in reality aren't that complex at all. Quite simple actually. We just have built up this thing we call consciousness as a way of coping with the amount of the stimuli we take in. Trying to make a computer now with consciousness would be like trying to run "No Man's Sky" on an analog computer made of gears. To make a computer with consciousness you'd need to replicate all of a stimuli a human takes in and plug it into a computer until it works.
ever thought of making an angel's egg video? maybe explaining whats up with the fucking movie? or making something like the thing you did with eva. I just finished watching it and didnt understand shit
i love you bye
+sudoStef Great! Along with Jose, that would really clear some things up, though I'm pretty certain about most of it. Looking forward to it!
what if we arent random either?
I want more cat stuff
Wouldn't you be able to replicate a brain if you could process one byte for every neuron in the brain REALLY fast? then study the neurons in a baby's brain to figure out how early development works in the brain and replicate those early Neurons with 1s and 0s?
yo how much for that chicken picture
texhnolyze song usageeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Don't you think we are limited somehow by our DNA? I find it interesting to compare the DNA to an algorithm. In someway is how we are programmed, we are chemical reactions at the end. The way our noradrenaline, serotonin, dopamine work is how we see the world and I'm not only talking about mental illness, I'm actually questioning free will at some point.