I took my GRE for the first time, after watching your quant videos. I scored a 326 and I think I owe you a big thanks. Your videos provided new insights. Being able to solve boss level questions helped build confidence. I did not get time to practice much, and only gave 2-3 mock tests, so I have been a bad student :P and score could have been better with your advice. But for me you have scored a 340/340 as a tutor too :). Thanks a ton, Philip. Please keep up the good work!
Powerful. Powerful insights. These will be a big help. I am taking my first GRE in 3 weeks and plan to take it a second time 3weeks after that. These videos and their tactical insights will be key. Thank you.
Thank you Philip, this has been immensely helpful. I am taking my GRE exam soon and I have been following your videos. so far I have seen a major improvement in my practice scores following your techniques.
Hi Philip, thank you for your videos. Just wanted to ask whether your Quant videos should suffice to get to 165+ in GRE? Any resources you recommend to practice GRE questions which are of similar format as current GRE?
First of all, thank you very much for your videos and the way you present the issues and tricks. They opened my eyes in some cases and I love your videos. Now, I want to ask you a question on the second issue, in where x > 1 and picking number 1 to yield surprising result: the GRE calculator does not support to do 2 to the power of 1.005 (for example), then how can we make sure it will have the same result as when x=1 ?
On the first question how can it say more than 2/3 and less than 3/4 yet the boundaries it gives you are the other way round? i.e. revenue must sit at more than 32,000 (implied by 3/4) and less than 36,000 *implied by 2/3 information?
Can you always pick the boundary in these types of questions? And if your boundary gives you a different answer than what you initially picked, is it safe to assume D always?
I think you should rewatch the video. Your complaint alludes to you not understanding the concept he was trying to teach the entire video. Yes, it says that the absolute value is lesser than 2 which means -1,0,1 like you correctly stated but you also need to account for values that are not integers including -1.99999. Using that value though would be extremely onerous and you could just use 2 instead. The only caveat is that you would have to remember when picking the final answer that the actual answer needs to be slightly higher or lower than your solution depending on your constraint
I took my GRE for the first time, after watching your quant videos. I scored a 326 and I think I owe you a big thanks.
Your videos provided new insights. Being able to solve boss level questions helped build confidence. I did not get time to practice much, and only gave 2-3 mock tests, so I have been a bad student :P and score could have been better with your advice. But for me you have scored a 340/340 as a tutor too :).
Thanks a ton, Philip. Please keep up the good work!
Well done Samir and thank you for the kind words! Glad you score me so highly!
Just came to like the video, still watched it while having coffee! Absolutely remarkable technique!
Hope it was nice coffee!
@@TheTestedTutor it definitely was! Would like to do this regularly
Thanks Philip, you are a last-minute confidence booster!!
Just binge watching your videos, thanks for the new upload! :3
Powerful. Powerful insights. These will be a big help. I am taking my first GRE in 3 weeks and plan to take it a second time 3weeks after that. These videos and their tactical insights will be key. Thank you.
Thank you Philip, you’re amazing tutor 😊thank you for your videos 👍🏻
Thank you Philip, this has been immensely helpful. I am taking my GRE exam soon and I have been following your videos. so far I have seen a major improvement in my practice scores following your techniques.
@The Lost Empire I am from Egypt, Took my test in November
@The Lost Empire I scored 323, 165 in Q and 158 in V.
Totally amazing work.With respect we want more amazing mathematical videos from you.❤️
Thank you G, with respect
Hi Philip, thank you for your videos. Just wanted to ask whether your Quant videos should suffice to get to 165+ in GRE? Any resources you recommend to practice GRE questions which are of similar format as current GRE?
Awesome video Philip !! Loving it..
First of all, thank you very much for your videos and the way you present the issues and tricks. They opened my eyes in some cases and I love your videos.
Now, I want to ask you a question on the second issue, in where x > 1 and picking number 1 to yield surprising result: the GRE calculator does not support to do 2 to the power of 1.005 (for example), then how can we make sure it will have the same result as when x=1 ?
Thanks man, that's really insightful.
Thank you so much sir 🙏for such valuable content, I have my GRE exam next week and your videos are helping me a lot in preparation.
Good luck Meenu!
@@TheTestedTutor Thank you 😊
Hi Philip, You are great at what you do , can you help me in my GRE prep as I'm not able to score above 283. Looking forward to your kind response.
Thank you for sharing!
Awesome. Thanks Tested Tutor
On the first question how can it say more than 2/3 and less than 3/4 yet the boundaries it gives you are the other way round? i.e. revenue must sit at more than 32,000 (implied by 3/4) and less than 36,000 *implied by 2/3 information?
Thanks
in the last question can we take x as 1/10000 , so that the value becomes zero ?
Can you always pick the boundary in these types of questions? And if your boundary gives you a different answer than what you initially picked, is it safe to assume D always?
Great
In last question., why did you take -2 , ideally the possible values are -1 0 1 , since -2
(4.9999999999999)^(-1.99999999999999)=0.0400000002
I think you should rewatch the video. Your complaint alludes to you not understanding the concept he was trying to teach the entire video. Yes, it says that the absolute value is lesser than 2 which means -1,0,1 like you correctly stated but you also need to account for values that are not integers including -1.99999. Using that value though would be extremely onerous and you could just use 2 instead.
The only caveat is that you would have to remember when picking the final answer that the actual answer needs to be slightly higher or lower than your solution depending on your constraint
For the last question, can't we just put X as 0 and 0 raised to anything would be 0 which is less than 0.05
5 to the power of 0 is 1 though
@@TheTestedTutor Ah yes my fault idk why I thought it was 0 raised to itself. Thanks for the correction
❤❤❤❤❤